Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

POSSUM, p-POSSUM, and Cr-POSSUM: Implementation Issues in a United States Health Care System for Prediction of Outcome for Colon Cancer Resection

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

PURPOSE:

The Physiologic and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (POSSUM), Portsmouth revision (p)-POSSUM, and colorectal (Cr)-POSSUM scoring systems were developed as audit tools for comparing outcomes in surgical and colorectal patients on the basis of operative risk assessment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the applicability of these systems to a cohort of colon cancer patients undergoing surgery in the United States.

METHODS:

POSSUM factors from 890 consecutive patients undergoing major surgical procedures for colon cancer in nine United States hospitals over a two-year period from January 2000 through December 2001 were prospectively collected. The observed over the expected hospital mortality was compared by means of the POSSUM, p-POSSUM, and Cr-POSSUM scoring systems. The effect of missing data on the utility of this process for outcome assessment was assessed with three methods for data imputation.

RESULTS:

The number of resections per institution ranged from 13 to 437. The observed mortality rate ranged from 0.8 percent to 15.4 percent among the institutions, with an overall operative mortality of 2.3 percent. The POSSUM, p-POSSUM, and Cr-POSSUM predicted mortality was 10.7 percent, 11.2 percent, and 4.9 percent, respectively. The POSSUM and p-POSSUM models overpredicted mortality in all institutions (P < 0.01), whereas the Cr-POSSUM demonstrated an observed over expected hospital mortality ratio of >1 in three institutions. The calculations were unaffected by the various methods of inserting missing data.

CONCLUSION:

An apparent overprediction of mortality for colon cancer resection was evident with all three POSSUM variants. This implies that a calibration process is required for use of these variants in the United States health care system. Missing data may be treated as normal values without influencing outcome. The Cr-POSSUM appeared to be the most promising audit tool for colorectal cancer surgery; however, it will require further refinement to provide process control graphs for identification of potential outliers and improvement in the quality of care in the United States.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

REFERENCES

  1. PM Sagar MN Hartley B Mancey-Jones PC Sedman J May J MacFie (1994) ArticleTitleComparative audit of colorectal resection with POSSUM scoring system Br J Surg 81 1492–4 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqC38%2FjvFM%3D Occurrence Handle7820482

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. PM Sagar MN Hartley J MacFie BA Taylor GP Copeland (1996) ArticleTitleComparison of individual surgeon’s performance: risk-adjusted analysis with POSSUM scoring system Dis Colon Rectum 39 654–8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymB2cbgslw%3D Occurrence Handle8646952

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. L Rosen J Stasik SuffixJr J Reed SuffixIII JA Olenwine JS Aronoff D Sherman (1996) ArticleTitleVariations in colon and rectal surgical mortality: comparison of specialties with a state-legislated database Dis Colon Rectum 39 129–35 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymB38znt1c%3D Occurrence Handle8620777

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. DR Jones GP Copeland L Cossart Particlede (1992) ArticleTitleComparison of POSSUM with APACHE II for prediction of outcome from a surgical high-dependency unit Br J Surg 79 1293–6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyC3snptlI%3D Occurrence Handle1486421

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. MS Whiteley DR Prytherch B Higgins PC Weaver WG Prout (1996) ArticleTitleAn evaluation of the POSSUM surgical scoring system Br J Surg 83 812–5 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymA3svosVY%3D Occurrence Handle8696749

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. DR Prytherch MS Whiteley B Higgins PC Weaver WG Prout SJ Powell (1998) ArticleTitlePOSSUM and Portsmouth POSSUM for predicting mortality. Physiological and operative severity score for the enumeration of mortality and morbidity Br J Surg 85 1217–20 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1cvitlOrtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9752863

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. PP Tekkis HM Kocher AE Bentley et al. (2000) ArticleTitleOperative mortality rates among surgeons: comparison of POSSUM and p-POSSUM scoring systems in gastrointestinal surgery Dis Colon Rectum 43 1528–34 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2Fkt1Gjuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11089587

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. GP Copeland D Jones M Walters (1991) ArticleTitlePOSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit Br J Surg 78 355–60 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By6B3MrksV0%3D Occurrence Handle2021856

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tekkis PP, Prytherch DR, Kocher HM, et al. Risk-adjustment in colorectal surgery: colorectal-POSSUM scoring system. Br J Surg (in press).

  10. SD Bann S Sarin (2001) ArticleTitleComparative audit: the trouble with POSSUM J R Soc Med 94 632–4 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mnoslaqsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11733590

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. DW Hosmer S Lemeshow (2000) Applied logistic regression EditionNumber2nd ed John Wiley & Sons New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. WE Longo KS Virgo FE Johnson et al. (2000) ArticleTitleRisk factors for morbidity and mortality after colectomy for colon cancer Dis Colon Rectum 43 83–91 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3ntFagtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10813129

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. HJ Jones L Cossart Particlede (1999) ArticleTitleRisk scoring in surgical patients Br J Surg 86 149–57 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M7pvVykuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10100780

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. CJ Vacanti RJ VanHouton RC Hill (1970) ArticleTitleA statistical analysis of the relationship of physical status to postoperative mortality in 6388 cases Anesth Analg 49 564–6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:CS6B3cvotVM%3D Occurrence Handle5534668

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. L Goldman DL Caldera SR Nussbaum et al. (1977) ArticleTitleMultifactorial index of cardiac risk in non cardiac surgical procedures N Engl J Med 297 845–50 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:CSeD3M%2FisFQ%3D Occurrence Handle904659

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. G Prause B Ratzenhofer-Comenda G Pierer F Smolle-Juttner H Glanzer J Smolle (1997) ArticleTitleCan ASA grade or Goldman’s cardiac risk index predict per-operative mortality? A study of 16,227 patients Anaesthesia 52 203–6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiB2cnot1A%3D Occurrence Handle9124658

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. JL Mullen MH Gertner GP Buzby GL Goodhart EF Rosato (1979) ArticleTitleImplications of malnutrition in the surgical patient Arch Surg 114 121–5 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:CSaC2cvhtlY%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. GP Buzby JL Mullen DC Matthews CL Hobbs EF Rosato (1980) ArticleTitlePrognostic nutritional index in gastrointestinal surgery Am J Surg 139 160–7 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:Bi%2BD1crntlU%3D Occurrence Handle7350839

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. PP Tekkis HM Kocher N Kessaris et al. (2001) ArticleTitleHow accurate is POSSUM and p-POSSUM in predicting mortality in emergency surgery and in old age [abstract]? Br J Surg 88(Suppl 1) 42–3

    Google Scholar 

  20. PP Tekkis N Kessaris HM Kocher JD Poloniecki J Lyttle AC Windsor (2003) ArticleTitleEvaluation of POSSUM and p-POSSUM scoring systems in patients undergoing colorectal surgery Br J Surg 90 340–5 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s%2Fot1Oitw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12594670

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank The Cleveland Clinic Health system Colorectal Cancer Quality Team for their support and assistance: Dan Borison, M.D., Hillcrest Hospital; Raphael Chung, M.D., Huron; Hospital; Roger Classen, D.O., South Pointe Hospital; Peter Cohn, M.D., South Pointe Hospital; Deborah Nadzam, Ph.D., FAAN Quality Institute of the CCHS; Rich Niemczura, M.D., Euclid Hospital; William O’Brien, M.D., Marymount Hospital; David Perse, M.D., Lutheran Hospital; Marvin Shie, M.D., Lakewood Hospital; Russ Zachem, D.O., South Pointe Hospital.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio

    Anthony J. Senagore M.D., M.S., M.B.A., Conor P. Delaney M.Ch., Ph.D, F.R.C.S.I., Gen., Paris P. Tekkis M.D., F.R.C.S. & Victor W. Fazio M.B., M.S.

  2. The Quality Institute, Cleveland Clinic Health System, Cleveland, Ohio

    Anthony J. Warmuth C.P.H.Q.

Authors
  1. Anthony J. Senagore M.D., M.S., M.B.A.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anthony J. Warmuth C.P.H.Q.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Conor P. Delaney M.Ch., Ph.D, F.R.C.S.I., Gen.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Paris P. Tekkis M.D., F.R.C.S.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Victor W. Fazio M.B., M.S.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony J. Senagore M.D., M.S., M.B.A..

About this article

Cite this article

Senagore, A., Warmuth, A., Delaney, C. et al. POSSUM, p-POSSUM, and Cr-POSSUM: Implementation Issues in a United States Health Care System for Prediction of Outcome for Colon Cancer Resection. Dis Colon Rectum 47, 1435–1441 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0604-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0604-1

Key words

Search

Navigation