Abstract
In this study, it was aimed to perform an energy analysis of organic grape production in Besni district of Adıyaman province of Turkey. In order to determine the energy input-output of organic grape production, the observations and surveys were performed in the 82 organic grape growers in Adıyaman province. 82 farms were selected on full count method. The data obtained from study were collected from 82 different farms (398.32 hectares) by face to face questionnaires and observations. In organic grape farms, energy input-output analysis was also determinated by observation and survey methods in production season in 2015. In organic grape production, energy input was calculated as 24,875.06 MJ ha−1 and energy output was calculated as 163,430 MJ ha−1. Energy use efficiency, energy productivity, specific energy and net energy in organic grape production were calculated as 6.57; 0.56 kg MJ−1, 1.79 MJ kg−1 and 138,554.94 MJ ha−1, respectively.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Organic farming is a type of farming that is practised only through cultural measures, biologic control and organic based inputs, by selecting appropriate ecologies and without using artificial chemical inputs, with the purpose of conducting herbal or animal production without harming the balance of nature. The purpose of organic farming is to protect environment, plants, human and animal health, without polluting soil, air and water resources (Kızılaslan and Olgun 2012). In the world, 37.2 million ha area is being used for organic farming. When we consider the gathering areas in nature (41.9 million ha), this figure becomes 79.1 million ha. According to 2009 data, 0.9% of the World’s agricultural lands are under organic production (Anonym 2016a). According to TÜİK (Turkish Statistical Institute) data, in 2011 our total product number was 225, total number of farmers 42,460, total area of organic farming was 614,618 ha and our total production was 1,659,543 tons, including organic farming transition period. The number of farmers practising organic farming is constantly increasing in Turkey (Anonym 2016b). Many farmers and agriculturists are using organic fertilizer such as vermicompost and manure for organic farming in Turkey nowadays (Belliturk et al. 2015a).
Agriculture is a one of the main areas of development in developing countries like Turkey (Belliturk et al. 2015b). Located on the most suitable climate zone in the world for viniculture, Turkey is not only the gene centre of grapevine, but it has also a very old and deep rooted grapey culture. South-eastern Anatolian Region, is one of the most grape producing regions of Turkey, preceded by Aegean and Mediterranean regions, and it has a share of approximately 10% of the national production. Grape is one of the products that are being exported by our country, and it has a high nutritional value. According to the results of various researches, it contains A, B, B2 and C vitamins. Grape is not only for table consumption, but it is also used for drying, winemaking, fermentation and tinned food, therefore it can be used as a source of nutrition throughout the year (Anonym 2016c). Organic viniculture aims to re-establish the ecologic balance which has been harmed due to malpractices, by using conscious agricultural techniques and natural inputs and also to create a vivid and sustainable agro-ecosystem. Organic viniculture is not a costly luxury. In contrast to what many people think, it is not an impracticable farming type, but rather something that requires knowledge and analysis. Organic viniculture is not an alternative of conventional production, but it is an opportunity given to us by the low contamination levels and climate conditions of our geography (Ateş 2012).
Comparing the total energy value of the inputs used in agricultural production by the energy value of the achieved product is a more realistic approach for evaluating production efficiency. Energy consumption through the use of tractors and agricultural tools/machines is being taken into account when defining the mechanization level, depending on the production systems and regional conditions (Erdoğan 2009). In this study was conducted in other researches. Researches were done on energy input-output analysis in agricultural products. For example, researches were made on energy usage activities of wheat (Çiçek et al. 2011), grape (Koçtürk and Engindeniz 2009), grape (Özkan et al. 2007), wheat (Marakoğlu and Çarman 2010), sunflower (Semerci 2013), black carrot (Çelik et al. 2010), barley (Baran and Gökdoğan 2014), maize (Konak et al. 2004) and sugar beet (Hacıseferoğulları et al. 2003), walnut (Banaeian and Zangeneh 2011) etc. In this study, the purpose was to determine the energy of efficiency of production, by revealing the energy inputs and outputs of organic grape production in Besni district of Adıyaman province.
Materials and Methods
The study was performed in Besni district of Adıyaman province of Turkey. Besni is located at the western end of the Southeastern Anatolia as geographical location is located in the western part of the province (Anonym 2016d). Surveys and observations were performed face to face with 82 organic grape farms, in production season during in 2015. Main material of study was composed of data accumaleted by face to face surveys made with 82 organic grape farms (3983.257 decares) in Adıyaman province. Surveys were made in totally 82 farms were determined by using full count method (Karagölge and Peker 2002). Total energy input in unit area (ha) constitutes of each total of input’s energy. Diesel fuel energy, machinery energy, organic chemicals energy, farmyard manure energy, lime energy, sulphur energy, water of irrigation energy and human labour energy were the inputs calculated. Organic grape were as output calculated.
Energy output/input ratio of the organic farms involved in organic farms agriculture in Adıyaman province was found. Energy balance calculations were made to determine the organic grape production productivity. The units shown in Table 1 was used to calculate the values of the inputs in organic grape production. Input amounts were calculated and then these inputs data were multiplied by the energy equivalent coefficient. By adding energy equivalents of all inputs in MJ unit, the total energy equivalent was found. Mohammadi et al. (2010) reported that, “The energy ratio (energy use efficiency), energy productivity, specific energy and net energy were calculated using the following formulates (Mandal et al. 2002; Mohammadi et al. 2008)”.
The results were tabulated after the analysis of data was done using Microsoft Excel program considering the inputs. Examining the values of organic grape input-output and calculations were given in Table 2. Koçtürk and Engindeniz (2009) reported that, “The input energy is also classified into direct and indirect and renewable and non-renewable forms. The indirect energy consists of pesticide and fertilizer while the direct energy includes human and animal power, diesel and electricity energy used in the production process. On the other hand, non-renewable energy includes petrol, diesel, electricity, chemicals, fertilizers, machinery and renewable energy consists of human and animal (Mandal et al. 2002; Singh et al. 2003)”. Energy input-output and efficiency calculations in organic grape production was given in Table 3.
Results and Discussion
In the farms, the amount of organic grape growed per hectare during the 2015 production season was calculated as an average of 13,850 kg. In organic grape production, it is noteworthy that human water of irrigation energy, machinery energy and diesel fuel energy were used as the highest input. Regarding this study, practics for organic grape production and the energy input-output analysis of organic grape production in 2015 were given in Table 2. It can be seen that the first, second and third of the highest energy of inputs in organic grape production are 61.46% water of irrigation energy, 13.29% machinery energy and 12.51% diesel fuel energy were the inputs calculated.
It can be seen that the highest energy inputs in organic grape production are 15,288 MJ ha−1 (61.46%) water of irrigation energy, 3304.80 MJ ha−1 (13.29%) machinery energy, 3113.94 MJ ha−1 (12.51%) diesel fuel energy, 1374.16 (5.53%) organic chemicals energy, 1080 MJ ha−1 (4.34%) farmyard manure energy, 691.21 MJ ha−1 (2.78%) human labour energy, 11.75 MJ ha−1 (0.05%) lime energy and 11.20 MJ ha−1 (0.04%) sulphur energy as were the inputs calculated. The results indicated that human labour energy input was calculated 691.21 MJ ha−1 in organic grape production. Human labour energy was used for tractor and farm operations such as tillage, pruning-collecting, digging of roots, arm connecting, green pruning, fertilizer application, spraying- spraying of hand, water of irrigation, harvesting and transporting. Diesel energy input was calculated 3113.94 MJ ha−1. The diesel energy was used for operating tractor to perform the farm operations such as tillage, spraying and transportation. Machinery energy input was calculated 3304.80 MJ ha−1. Machinery energy was used for tractor and farm operations such as tillage, spraying and transporting.
Energy input, energy output, energy use efficiency, energy productivity, specific energy and net energy in organic grape production were calculated as 24,875.06 MJ ha−1, 163,430 MJ ha−1, 6.57; 0.56 kg MJ−1; 1.79 MJ kg−1 and 138,554.94 MJ ha−1, respectively. In previous studies, Özkan et al. (2007) calculated energy use efficiency in grape study as 2.99, 5.10, Koçtürk and Engindeniz (2009) calculated energy use efficiency in grape study as 8.64 and Hamedani et al. (2011) calculated energy use efficiency in grape study as 4.95. Other studies, Erdal et al. (2007) calculated energy use efficiency in sugar beet study as 25.75, Mohammadi et al. (2010) calculated energy use efficiency in kiwifruit study as 1.54 and Demircan et al. (2006) calculated energy use efficiency in apple study as 1.23. The total energy input consumed could be classified as renewable 74.20% and non-renewable 25.80% in organic grape production. Renewable energy is higher than ratio of non-renewable energy.
Conclusions
Efficient use of energy is one of the principal requirements of sustainable agriculture. Energy use in agriculture has been increasing in response to increasing population, limited supply of arable land, and a desire for higher standards of living. Continuous demand in increasing food production resulted in intensive use of chemical fertilizers, pesticides, agricultural machinery, and other natural resources (Erdal et al. 2007). In this study, the energy balance of organic grape production in the region was defined. According to the evaluated results, organic grape production is a economic production in terms of energy usage.
References
Anonym (2016a) Türkiye’de organik tarım stratejik plan (2012–2016). http://www.corlutb.tobb.org.tr/uploads/docs/18072012A1LK_y.pdf
Anonym (2016b) Türkiye’de organik tarım. http://www.ecas.com.tr/turkiyede-organik-tarim
Anonym (2016c) Asma yetiştiriciliği. http://www.organiktarimantalya.com/yetistiricilik/uzumyetistir.htm
Anonym (2016d) In Turkish. http://besni.meb.gov.tr/www/cografi-yapi/icerik/22
Ateş F (2012) Organik üzüm yetiştiriciliği, Manisa Bağcılık Araştırma Enstitüsü Müdürlüğü, Organik sofralık Üzüm Yetiştiriciliği projesi, TAGEM. http://arastirma.tarim.gov.tr/manisabagcilik/Belgeler/genelbagcilik/ORGANIK%20UZUM%20YETISTIRICILIGI%20FADIME%20ATES.pdf
Banaeian N, Zangeneh M (2011) Modeling energy flow and economic analysis for walnut production in Iran. Res J Appl Sci Eng Technol 3(3):194–201
Baran MF, Gökdoğan O (2014) Energy input-output analysis of barley production in Thrace region of Turkey. Am Eurasian J Agric Environ Sci 14(11):1255–1261
Belliturk K, Görres JH, Bağdatlı MC, Göçmez S, Turan HS, Eker M, Aslan S (2015a) The evaluation of olive pruning waste as a vermicompost: micro elements. Tarım Vizyon J 1(1):7–12
Belliturk K, Shrestha P, Görres JH (2015b) The importance of phytoremediation of heavy metal contaminated soil using vermicompost for sustainable agriculture. Rice J 3(2):6–e114
Bilalis D, Kamariari P‑E, Karkanis A, Efthimiadou A, Zorpas A, Kakabouki I (2013) Energy inputs, output and productivity in organic and conventional maize and tomato production, under mediterranean conditions. Not Bot Horti Agrobot 41(1):190–194
Demircan V, Ekinci K, Keener HM, Akbolat D, Ekinci Ç (2006) Energy and economic analysis of sweet cherry production in Turkey: a case study from Isparta province. Energy Convers Manag 47:1761–1769
Ekinci K, Akbolat D, Demircan V, Ekinci Ç (2005) Isparta ili elma üretiminde enerji kullanım etkinliğinin belirlenmesi. 3. Yenilenebilir Enerji Kaynakları Sempozyumu ve Sergisi, Mersin, pp 43–47
Erdal G, Esengün K, Erdal H, Gündüz O (2007) Energy use and economical analysis of sugar beet production in Tokat province of Turkey. Energy 32:35–41
Erdoğan Y (2009) Tarımsal üretimde enerji girdi çıktı analizlerinde kullanılacak internet tabanlı bir yazılımın geliştirilmesi. Ç.Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi Tarım Makinaları Anabilim Dalı Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Adana
Guzmán GI, Alonso AM (2008) A comparison of energy use in conventional and organic olive oil production in Spain. Agric Syst 98:167–176
Hacıseferoğulları H, Acaroglu M, Gezer I (2003) Determination of the energy balance of the sugar beet plant. Energy Sources 25:15–22
Hamedani SR, Keyhani A, Alimardani R (2011) Energy use patterns and econometric models of grape production in Hamadan province of Iran. Energy 1–7. DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2011.09.041
Karaağaç MA, Aykanat S, Cakır B, Eren O, Turgut MM, Barut ZB, Öztürk HH (2011) Energy balance of wheat and maize crops production in Haciali undertaking. Proceedings 11th International Congress on Mechanization and Energy in Agriculture Congress, 21.–23. Sep., Istanbul, pp 388–391
Karagölge C, Peker K (2002) Tarım ekonomisi araştırmalarında tabakalı örnekleme yönteminin kullanılması. Atatürk Ünivers Ziraat Fak Derg 33(3):313–316 ((In Turkish))
Konak M, Marakoğlu T, Özbek O (2004) Energy balance at corn production. Selçuk Univers Agric Fac J 18(34):28–30 ((In Turkish))
Koçtürk OM, Engindeniz S (2009) Energy and cost analysis of sultana grape growing: a case study of Manisa, west Turkey. Afr J Agric Res 4(10):938–943
Kızılaslan H (2009) Input-output energy analysis of cherries production in Tokat province of Turkey. Appl Energy 86:1354–1358
Kızılaslan H, Olgun A (2012) Türkiye’de organik tarım ve organik tarıma verilen desteklemeler. Gaziosmanpaşa Ünivers Ziraat Fak Derg 29(1):1–12
Mandal KG, Saha KP, Ghosh PK, Hati KM, Bandyopadhyay KK (2002) Bioenergy and economic analysis of soybean based crop production systems in central India. Biomass Bioenergy 23:337–345
Mani I, Kumar P, Panwar JS, Kant K (2007) Variation in energy consumption in production of wheat-maize with varying altitudes in hill regions of Himachal Prades, India. Energy 32:2336–2339
Marakoğlu T, Çarman K (2010) Energy balance of direct seeding applications used in wheat production in middle Anatolia. Afr J Agric Res 5(10):988–992
Mohammadi A, Tabatabaeefar A, Shahin S, Rafiee S, Keyhani A (2008) Energy use and economical analysis of potato production in Iran a case study: ardabil province. Energy Convers Manag 49:3566–3570
Mohammadi A, Rafiee S, Mohtasebi SS, Rafiee H (2010) Energy inputs-yield relationship and cost analysis of kiwifruit production in Iran. Renew Energy 35:1071–1075
Mrini, M. (1999). Le cout energetique de l’irrigation des cultures sucrieres au Gharb, 2eme rapport d’atat d’avancement, Ecole Doctorale. Institut Agronomique et Veterinaire Hassan II. BP 6202, Rabat, Morocco
Mrini M, Senhaji F, Pimentel D (2002) Energy analysis of sugar beet production under traditional and intensive farming systems and impacts on sustainable agriculture in Morocco. Res Rev Pract Policy Technol 20(4):5–28
Nagy CN (1999) Energy Coefficients for Agricultural Inputs in Western Canada. Centre for Studies in Agriculture, Law and the EnvironmentUniversity of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK
Özkan B, Fert C, Karadeniz CF (2007) Energy and cost analysis for greenhouse and open-field grape production. Energy 32(2007):1500–1504
Pimentel D (1980) Handbook of energy utilization in agriculture. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Semerci A (2013) Economic analysis of sunflower production in the view of orobanche resistance conditions. Pak J Agri Sci 50(3):409–504
Singh H, Mishra D, Nahar NM, Ranjan M (2003) Energy use pattern in production agriculture of a typical village in Arid Zone India (Part II). Energy Convers Manag 44:1053–1067
Singh, J. M. 2002. On farm energy use pattern in different cropping systems in Haryana, India. International Institute of Management University of Flensburg, Sustainable Energy Systems and Management. Master of Science, Germany
Çelik Y, Peker K, Oğuz C (2010) Comparative analysis of energy efficiency in organic and conventional farming systems: a case study of black carrot (Daucus carota L.) production in Turkey. Philipp Agric Sci 93(2):224–231
Çiçek A, Altıntaş G, Erdal G (2011) Energy consumption patterns and economic analysis of irrigated wheat and rainfed wheat production: case study for Tokat region, Turkey. Bulg J Agric Sci 17(3):378–388
Acknowledgements
This research was supported with (Project number: TFMAP/2015-0001) by the Scientific Projects Administration Unit of Adıyaman University, Adıyaman, Turkey.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baran, M.F., Lüle, F. & Gökdoğan, O. Energy Input-Output Analysis of Organic Grape Production: A Case Study from Adiyaman Province. Erwerbs-Obstbau 59, 275–279 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-017-0322-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-017-0322-1