Abstract
The Columbia root-knot nematode (CRKN), Meloidogyne chitwoodi, is an EPPO A2 type quarantine pest since 1998. This nematode causes severe damage in economically important crops such as potato and tomato, making agricultural products unacceptable for the fresh market and food processing. Commonly used nematicidal synthetic chemicals are often environmentally unsafe. Essential oils (EOs) may constitute safer alternatives against RKN. EOs, isolated from 56 plant samples, were tested against CRKN hatching, in direct contact bioassays. Some of the most successful EOs were fractionated and the hydrocarbon molecules (HM) and oxygen-containing molecules (OCM) fractions tested separately. 24 EOs displayed very strong hatching inhibitions (≥90 %) at 2 µL mL−1 and were further tested at lower concentrations. Dysphania ambrosioides, Filipendula ulmaria, Ruta graveolens, Satureja montana and Thymbra capitata EOs revealed the lowest EC50 values (<0.15 µL mL−1). The main compounds of these EOs, namely 2-undecanone, ascaridol, carvacrol, isoascaridol, methyl salicylate, p-cymene and/or γ-terpinene, were putatively considered responsible for CRKN hatching inhibition. S. montana and T. capitata OCM fractions showed hatching inhibitions higher than HM fractions. The comparison of EO and corresponding fractions EC50 values suggests interactions between OCM and HM fractions against CRKN hatching. These species EOs showed to be potential environmentally friendly CRKN hatching inhibitors; nonetheless, bioactivity should be considered globally, since its HM and OCM fractions may contribute, diversely, to the full anti-hatching activity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Key message
-
This study identified five very strong hatching inhibitor EOs isolated from Dysphania ambrosioides, Filipendula ulmaria, Ruta graveolens, Satureja montana and Thymbra capitata.
-
Fractionation and testing suggested that fractions containing hydrocarbon compounds (HM) and oxygenated compounds (OCM) may each contribute to the full anti-hatching activity.
Introduction
Root-knot disease is caused by plant parasitic nematodes of the genus Meloidogyne and is characterized by the presence of galls or knots in the roots below ground and stunted growth, yellowing of the leaves, lack of vigour, a tendency to wilt under moisture stress and collapse of individual plants above ground that are similar to other root diseases. These symptoms are due to infection which mobilizes the plant’s photosynthates from shoots to roots and affects water and nutrient absorption and translocation in the root system to support nematode development and reproduction (EPPO 2012). The Columbia root-knot nematode (CRKN), Meloidogyne chitwoodi Golden et al. (1980), a sedentary and obligate plant endoparasite, is responsible for large economic losses in several horticultural and field crops and has been classified, in 1998, as an A2 type quarantine pest by the European Plant Protection Organization (EPPO 2012). Since its first description in the Pacific Northwest, USA, several reports have been made in South Africa, Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands, Portugal, Mexico and Argentina (Golden et al. 1980; Conceição et al. 2009; OEPP, EPPO 2009; Wesemael et al. 2011). In potato, tuber infection is characterized by the presence of galls, small raised swellings on the surface above the developing nematodes, and necrosis and browning of the internal tissue below the gall. When 5 % or more of the tubers are tarnished, the crop is usually unmarketable (EPPO 2012). Being the world’s fourth-largest food crop (FAO 2009), potato production employs large quantities of pesticides, mainly synthetic chemicals applied by soil fumigation (e.g. 1,3-dichloropropene, methyl bromide, dazomet or nervous system toxins such as oxamyl and fenamiphos) (Mitkowski and Abawi 2003). Although highly efficient in controlling this soil pest (Pinkerton et al. 1986), fumigation has a negative environmental impact, making the continued availability and use of soil fumigants uncertain. In face of the recent EU environmental restrictions, it is necessary to develop environmentally safer control techniques based upon natural products. Essential oils (EOs) may prove to be sound alternatives to synthetic nematicides. They are complex mixtures of volatiles, mainly products from the plant secondary metabolism, comprised terpenes, mostly mono-, sesqui- and diterpenes, and phenolic compounds, such as phenylpropanoids, although other groups of compounds can also occur in relevant amounts. Generally biodegradable, EOs have low toxicity to mammals and do not accumulate in the environment (Figueiredo et al. 2008). Moreover, the biological activities of EOs can often exceed the sum of their single constituent’s activities, due to synergy (Ntalli et al. 2011a; Kumrungsee et al. 2014). As complex mixtures, EOs may display several biological activities which make them desirable biopesticides (Batish et al. 2008) able of controlling not only the targeted pest but also opportunistic species and resistant strains.
No studies on the effect of EOs against M. chitwoodi have been conducted, but a strong anti-nematode activity, against other Meloidogyne species, was found in several EOs, such as those of Allium sativum, Carum capticum, C. carvi, Chrysanthemum coronarium, Eucalyptus globulus, Foeniculum vulgare, Mentha rotundifolia, M. spicata, Origanum majorana, Pimpinella anisum and Syzygium aromaticum, and among others (Oka et al. 2000; Pérez et al. 2003; Ibrahim et al. 2006; Meyer et al. 2008; Douda et al. 2010; Gupta et al. 2011; Ntalli et al. 2011a; Andrés et al. 2012).
In an attempt to clarify the nematotoxic potential of EOs against different types of nematodes and their value to sustainable pest control, a previous study addressed the nematotoxicity of several EOs against a different nematode type, the pinewood nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Faria et al. 2013). To our best knowledge, no previous study has addressed the activity of EOs against CRKN hatching. In view of the increasing potato demand and the need for environmentally safer anti-nematode compounds, the present study aimed at performing a comparative screening of EOs to (a) determine, through direct contact bioassays, those that show high hatching inhibition and (b) assess the relative importance of EOs hydrocarbon- and oxygen-containing molecules (OCM) fractions in M. chitwoodi hatching inhibition.
Materials and methods
Nematodes
The CRKN eggs, used in the bioassays, were obtained from previously established Solanum tuberosum hairy roots with M. chitwoodi co-cultures (Faria et al. 2014). Subculture was performed monthly by refreshment of the culture medium. Approximately 5 g (fresh weight) of co-culture was transferred to 200 mL SH liquid medium (Schenk and Hildebrandt 1972), supplemented with 30 g L−1 sucrose, pH 5.6, maintained in darkness at 24 ± 1 °C on orbital shakers (80 rpm). After 3 months of subculture, galled hairy roots were excised and the CRKN eggs extracted by a 5-min immersion in a 0.52 % (v/v) sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) solution, with vigorous agitation (Hussey and Barker 1973). Eggs were collected in a 20-µm mesh sieve, rinsed thoroughly with ultrapure water, to remove NaOCl traces, quantified and used directly in the bioassays. Nematode and egg counting were performed using an inverted microscope [Diaphot, Nikon, Japan (×40)].
Plant material, essential oils and essential oil fractions
Collective and/or individual samples, from cultivated and wild-growing medicinal and aromatic plants, were collected from mainland Portugal and at the Azores archipelago (Portugal) (Table 1). Dried aerial parts from commercially available products sold in local herbal shops were also analysed. A total of 56 samples from sixteen families were tested. A voucher specimen of each plant species, collected from wild state condition, was deposited in the Herbarium of the Botanical Garden of Lisbon University, Lisbon, Portugal. For commercial plant material, a reference sample from each plant is retained at the CBV laboratory and is available upon request.
Essential oils were isolated by hydrodistillation for 3 h using a Clevenger type apparatus according to the European Pharmacopoeia (Council of Europe 2010). Hydrodistillation was run at a distillation rate of 3 mL min−1 and EOs stored in the dark at −20 °C, until analysis. Fractions containing hydrocarbons molecules (HM) or OCM were separated from each EO sample on a silica gel column by elution with distilled n-pentane and diethyl ether, respectively, as previously detailed (Faria et al. 2013).
Analysis of volatiles
Volatiles were analysed by gas chromatography (GC), for component quantification, and GC coupled to mass spectrometry (GC–MS) for component identification. Gas chromatographic analyses were performed using a Perkin Elmer Autosystem XL gas chromatograph (Perkin Elmer, Shelton, CT, USA) equipped with two flame ionization detectors, a data handling system and a vaporising injector port into which two columns of different polarities were installed: a DB-1 fused-silica column (30 m × 0.25 mm i.d., film thickness 0.25 μm; J & W Scientific Inc., Rancho Cordova, CA, USA) and a DB-17HT fused-silica column (30 m × 0.25 mm i.d., film thickness 0.15 μm; J & W Scientific Inc., Rancho Cordova, CA, USA). Oven temperature was programmed to increase from 45 to 175 °C, at 3 °C min−1 increments, then up to 300 °C at 15 °C min−1 increments, and finally held isothermal for 10 min. Gas chromatographic settings were as follows: injector and detectors temperatures, 280 and 300 °C, respectively; carrier gas, hydrogen, adjusted to a linear velocity of 30 cm s−1. The samples were injected using a split sampling technique, ratio 1:50. The volume of injection was 0.1 μL of a pentane-oil solution (1:1). The percentage composition of the oils was computed by the normalization method from the GC peak areas, calculated as a mean value of two injections from each volatile oil, without response factors.
The GC–MS unit consisted of a Perkin Elmer Autosystem XL gas chromatograph, equipped with DB–1 fused-silica column (30 m ×0.25 mm i.d., film thickness 0.25 μm; J & W Scientific, Inc., Rancho Cordova, CA, USA) interfaced with Perkin-Elmer Turbomass mass spectrometer (software version 4.1, Perkin Elmer). GC–MS settings were as follows: injector and oven temperatures were as above; transfer line temperature, 280 °C; ion source temperature, 220 °C; carrier gas, helium, adjusted to a linear velocity of 30 cm s−1; split ratio, 1:40; ionization energy, 70 eV; scan range, 40–300 u; scan time, 1 s. The identity of the components was assigned by comparison of their retention indices relative to C8–C25 n-alkane indices, and GC–MS spectra from a laboratory made library based upon the analyses of reference oils, laboratory-synthesized components and commercial available standards.
The percentage composition of the isolated EOs was used to determine the relationship among the samples by cluster analysis using Numerical taxonomy multivariate analysis system (NTSYS-pc software, version 2.2, Exeter Software, Setauket, New York) (Rohlf 2000). For cluster analysis, correlation coefficient was selected as a measure of similarity among all accessions and the unweighted pair group method with arithmetical averages (UPGMA) was used for cluster definition. The degree of correlation was evaluated, according to Pestana and Gageiro (2000), as very high (0.9–1), high (0.7–0.89), moderate (0.4–0.69), low (0.2–0.39) and very low (<0.2).
Bioassays
All bioassays were performed in flat bottom 96-well microtiter plates (Carl Roth GmbH + Co. KG, Karlsruhe, Germany). EOs, hydrocarbon molecules (HM) and OCM fractions were assayed in suspensions of newly extracted mixed-developmental stage M. chitwoodi eggs, using a methodology adapted from Faria et al. (2013). Egg suspensions were chosen for experimentation, instead of egg masses, to ensure that EO concentration was homogenous for all eggs. Aliquots with 99 µL of a suspension of eggs (80–100) were introduced to each well, and 1 µL of EOs or fractions stock solutions prepared in methanol (Panreac Química S.A.U., Barcelona, Spain), at 200 µL mL−1, was added, being the highest concentration tested 2 µL mL−1. Stock solutions for 1, 0.5, 0.25 and 0.125 µL mL−1 were obtained by serial dilutions with a dilution factor of two. The EOs and fractions which showed hatching inhibitions <90 % were not further assayed at lower concentrations. Controls were performed with methanol, 1 % (v/v, methanol/egg suspension) and ultrapure water was used to check the hatching inhibition induced by methanol. The plates were covered to diminish EO volatilization, wrapped with aluminium foil to establish total darkness and maintained at 27 ± 1 °C. Hatched second-stage juvenile nematodes (J2) were counted every 24 h during three days (72 h). A minimum of 10 replicates was performed for each sample, in, at least, two separate assays.
Determination of hatching inhibition percentages and EC50 values
Hatching rates (J2 day−1) were obtained by fitting a linear regression to the cumulative time-course hatching data. Slope (m) values, corresponding to hatching rates, were used to determine the corrected hatching inhibition (CHI) through an adaptation of the Abbott formula (Abbott 1925), corrected hatching inhibition (CHI) % = [1–(mtreatment/mcontrol)] × 100.
Classification of the EOs and fractions hatching inhibition activity was adapted from Dias et al. (2012) in very strong (≥90 %) strong (60–89 %), moderate (37–59 %), weak (11–36 %) and low or inactive (<10 %).
Effective doses which resulted in 50 % hatching inhibition (EC50) were determined using the mean corrected hatching inhibition percentage values. These data were subjected to non-linear regression analysis using a dose–response log-logistic equation (Seefeldt et al. 1995):
which relates the average response y to dose x, and where C and D are, respectively, the lower- and the upper limit of the sigmoidal dose–response curve and b is the slope. This analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism® version 5.00 for Windows, San Diego California USA (www.graphpad.com), setting C to 0 % and D to 100 % with variable slope (b).
Results
Essential oils CRKN hatching inhibition
CRKN hatching inhibition percentages were evaluated through direct contact bioassays. Control assays were performed with ultrapure water and pure methanol, used as EO solvent. The average hatching rate of the controls ultrapure water and methanol was 5.0 ± 0.4 J2 day−1 and a 4.5 ± 0.3 J2 day−1, respectively. Hatching inhibition due to methanol, in the concentration 1 % (v/v), was considered negligible.
Herewith, 42 of the EOs previously tested against B. xylophilus motility (Faria et al. 2013) plus 14 new EOs were comparatively assessed against M. chitwoodi hatching. All 56 EOs were fully chemically characterized, although Table 1 reports only their main components (≥10 %). The full chemical composition of 42 samples was previously reported in Faria et al. (2013) supplementary Table, and the 14 new EOs full compositions are detailed in the current Supplementary Table, ST. Cluster analysis was performed on the EOs and EOs fractions full composition to identify groups of similar EO volatile patterns with very strong anti-hatching activities (Fig. 1). Samples were grouped into two main unrelated clusters (S corr < 0.2) (Fig. 1). Cluster I included EOs with specific volatile composition, namely those of Filipendula ulmaria, Nepeta cataria, Ruta graveolens and Syzygium aromaticum (Table 1). Cluster II grouped the remaining EOs and related HM and OCM fractions. This cluster grouped terpene-rich EOs and was sub-divided in several sub-clusters (Fig. 1).
Ineffective EOs, showing ≤10 % activity at the highest concentration (2 µL mL−1), were dominated by e.g. the monoterpenes, α-pinene, sabinene, camphor and/or terpinen-4-ol (Table 1; Fig. 1). A total of 24 EOs were the most successful with a CHI ≥ 90 % at 2 µL mL−1. Those isolated from Dysphania ambrosioides (isoascaridol 51 %, ascaridol 16 %), Filipendula ulmaria (methyl salicylate 85 %), Foeniculum vulgare 1 (trans-anethole 73 %) and 2 (methyl chavicol 79 %, limonene 12 %), Genista tridentata (cis-theaspirane 27 % and trans-theaspirane 22 %), Mentha arvensis (piperitenone oxide 56 %), N. cataria (4aα, 7α, 7aα-nepetalactone 89 %), R. graveolens (2-undecanone 91 %) and S. aromaticum (eugenol 92 %) had a low correlation with other EOs (S corr < 0.4) (Fig. 1). Very strong inhibition percentages (≥90 %) at 2 µL mL−1 were also obtained for EOs showing highly correlated compositions (S corr > 0.7). These were gathered in sub-clusters IIa (S corr > 0.7), IIb (S corr > 0.9), IId (S corr > 0.9) and IIj (S corr > 0.8) (Fig. 1). α-Terpineol (16–62 %), thymol (traces-23 %), linalool (traces-16 %)], terpinen-4-ol (1–16 %), γ-terpinene (traces-15 %), carvacrol (traces-15 %) and p-cymene (traces-13 %) dominated the EO composition of the samples grouped in the first cluster. Corrected hatching inhibitions ≥94 %, at 2 µL mL−1, were obtained in sub-cluster IIb whose EOs showed thymol (32–45 %), p-cymene (14–22 %), γ-terpinene (6–16 %) and thymol acetate (0–15 %) as major components. Sub-cluster IId grouped samples with CHI ≥ 92 %, at 2 µL mL−1, which revealed to be rich in carvacrol (45–96 %), p-cymene [not detected (nd)-22 %], γ-terpinene (nd-18 %) and carvacrol acetate (nd-14 %).
The highly hatching inhibitor Cymbopogon citratus EO grouped in sub-cluster IIj, with the corresponding OCM fraction, due to their richness in geranial (34–45 %), neral (22–36 %), β-myrcene (traces-20 %) and geraniol (5–18 %).
Very strong EOs that caused CHI ≥ 90 %, at 2 µL mL−1, namely those of D. ambrosioides, C. citratus, F. ulmaria, F. vulgare 1, 2, G. tridentata, M. arvensis, N. cataria, Origanum majorana, O. vulgare subsp. virens, O. vulgare, R. graveolens, Satureja montana 1, 2, S. aromaticum, Thymbra capitata, Th. caespititius 2, 3, 4, 5, Th. pulegioides, Th. vulgaris, Th. zygis subsp. silvestris and Th. zygis subsp. zygis (Table 1; Fig. 1) were tested at lower concentrations. At the lowest concentration, 0.125 µL mL−1, only the EOs extracted from D. ambrosioides, F. ulmaria, R. graveolens, S. montana 1, 2 and T. capitata exhibited a moderate to strong inhibitory activity. Half maximal effective concentrations (EC50) for these EOs were calculated by fitting a dose–response log-logistic curve to the percentage CHI data. EC50 values obtained were 0.041 µL mL−1 for D. ambrosioides, 0.032 µL mL−1 for Fi. ulmaria, 0.061 and 0.033 µL mL−1 for S. montana 1 and 2, respectively, 0.121 µL mL−1 for R. graveolens and 0.140 µL mL−1 for T. capitata EOs (Table 2).
Hydrocarbons or oxygen-containing molecules fractions CRKN hatching inhibition
Due to their specific EO composition, a balanced percentage of hydrocarbons and OCM, and to CHI ≥ 90 %, the EOs of C. citratus, O. vulgare, S. montana, T. capitata and Th. caespititius 4 (Table 3) were chosen for fractionation, to evaluate the separate contribution of the HM and OCM fractions against hatching.
Oxygen-containing molecules fractions of these EOs revealed hatching inhibitions ≥92 % at 2 µL mL−1 (Fig. 1; Table 3). At the same concentration, the corresponding HM fractions showed activities ≤62 % (Fig. 1; Table 3).
The richness in oxygen compounds is reflected in cluster analysis (Fig. 1), as all OCM fractions grouped closely to their corresponding EOs (S corr ≥ 0.8). This was not observed for the HM fractions that grouped together (S corr ≥ 0.7), with the exception of C. citratus, showing similar chemical compositions (Fig. 1).
Given the results above, EC50 values were determined only for the most successful OCM fractions (Table 2), revealing additive/synergic interactions among the fractions. S. montana OCM fraction showed a higher EC50 value than that of the related EO, although the oxygen-containing compounds were present in higher proportions in the fraction. This suggests that in addition to the oxygen-containing compounds, the HM fraction also plays an important role in hatching toxicity of this EO. On the other hand, Thymbra capitata OCM fraction revealed a lower EC50 value than that of the related EO, suggesting that M. chitwoodi hatching toxicity may be EO specific.
Discussion
The present work is the first screening of EOs and EO fractions with hatching inhibition activity on the CRKN. D. ambrosioides, F. ulmaria, R. graveolens, S. montana and T. capitata EOs were herewith shown to have the lowest EC50 values against CRKN hatching. The main compounds of these EOs, namely 2-undecanone, ascaridol, carvacrol, isoascaridol, methyl salicylate, p-cymene and/or γ-terpinene, were putatively considered responsible for CRKN hatching inhibition.
Ruta genus EOs nematotoxic activities have been previously described for other Meloidogyne species. Ruta chalepensis EO, also 2-undecanone-rich, displayed a high activity against M. incognita and M. javanica J2 motility (Ntalli et al. 2011b). Its mode of action is still unknown but aliphatic compounds are known to have high inhibition activities against acetylcholinesterase and glutathione S-transferase in the pinewood nematode (B. xylophilus) (Kang et al. 2013).
Thymus caespititius chemotypes, rich in carvacrol, thymol and α-terpineol, showed strong to very strong hatching inhibition, displaying CHI ≥ 78 %, at 2 µL mL−1. Nevertheless, as described by Faria et al. (2013) studying nematotoxic EOs against pinewood nematode B. xylophilus motility, the occurrence of chemotypes must be taken into account when choosing a nematotoxic EO bearing-species, since EO particular chemotype may be determinant in this activity.
Methyl salicylate has shown strong nematicidal properties against B. xylophilus, both as a synthetic chemical (at 2 mg mL−1) and as a major Gaultheria fragrantissima EO component (95 %) (at 5 mg mL−1) (Kim et al. 2011). This compound is known to be emitted by stressed plants as a signal involved in eliciting plant resistance (Loake and Grant 2007). Pest management using this EO may take advantage of these characteristics by inhibiting hatching and also stimulating the plant immune response.
D. ambrosioides EO and its components were assessed against M. incognita revealing low LC50 values (Bai et al. 2011). The EO showed LC50 values ×20 lower than some of its main components, which indicates heavy additive or synergic compound relations.
Satureja montana 1, 2 and T. capitata EOs had similar volatile compositions, being carvacrol- (64, 77 and 68 %, respectively) and γ-terpinene-rich (18, 5 and 11 %, respectively). EOs rich in the oxygen-containing monoterpenoids carvacrol and thymol are known to have nematotoxic activity against plant parasitic nematodes (Oka et al. 2000; Kong et al. 2007; Barbosa et al. 2010, 2012; Faria et al. 2013). Anti-nematode activities of S. montana EOs have been demonstrated against hatching and J2 motility of M. javanica (Andrés et al. 2012), yielding similar results to the obtained in the present work.
Monoterpenoid activity against M. incognita hatching and J2 juvenile motility was tested, in vitro, by Echeverrigaray et al. (2010). Of the compounds tested, high nematotoxic activities were obtained for the oxygen-containing monoterpenes borneol, carveol, citral (mixture of geranial and neral), geraniol and α-terpineol. Oka et al. (2000) showed that the monoterpenes carvacrol, thymol and trans-anethole also revealed high activities against M. javanica hatching and J2 juvenile motility. In the present study, high M. chitwoodi hatching inhibitions (≥90 %), at 2 µL mL−1, were observed not only for the monoterpene-rich EOs of Thymus caespititius 2 and T. zygis subsp. silvestris (α-terpineol, 62 and 60 %, respectively), and C. citratus (geranial−34 %, neral−22 % and geraniol−18 %) but also for the trans-anethole-rich Foeniculum vulgare 1 (73 %). The activity of geraniol-, citronellol- and linalool-rich Pelargonium graveolens EO was also tested against M. incognita J2 motility in direct contact assays, being highly nematotoxic. Commercial EO compounds were evaluated individually, in the concentrations found in the EO, suggesting that the combined effect of the constituents also play a role in the EO nematicidal activity (Leela et al. 1992).
Synergistic action of basil (Ocimum spp.) EO components, methyl chavicol and linalool, was found against Meloidogyne incognita, Heterodera avenae, H. cajani and H. zeae (Gokte et al. 1991), while individually each compound showed no appreciable nematicidal activity.
Oxygen-containing molecules fractions appear to contribute deeply to the EO hatching inhibition. The same has been suggested by Abd-Elgawad and Omer (1995), analysing EO effects on phytoparasitic nematodes hatching (Meloidogyne incognita) and juvenile motility (Rotylenchulus reniformis, Criconemella spp., Hoplolaimus spp.). In the present study, the activity of separate components was not assessed; nevertheless, evaluation of the isolated HM and OCM fractions against M. chitwoodi hatching showed that, for the activity of an EO, all its components play a distinct role, contributing in more than one way, either synergistically or antagonistically. Ntalli et al. (2011a) analysed these types of interactions among the terpene components of EOs active against M. incognita showing that combinations of nematotoxic terpenes, such as carvacrol/thymol or carvacrol/geraniol, and/or phenylpropanoids, methyl chavicol/geraniol or trans-anethole, had a synergistic activity against J2 motility. This study did not include interactions among non-nematotoxic and nematotoxic EO components.
According to the present results, both the highly active oxygen-containing terpenes and the low hatching inhibition hydrocarbon terpenes cooperate against CRKN hatching. The higher activities of oxygen-containing monoterpenes against phytoparasitic nematodes has been described in several previous studies, but, to our knowledge, this is the first report on the hatching inhibition activity of EOs and their fractions against M. chitwoodi. Fractionation and evaluation of the fractions activities containing HM or OCM revealed that this approach, for some EOs, may improve hatching inhibition.
The high nematotoxic properties of some EOs encourage their use as environmentally safer nematicides for the management of the CRKN taken into account that the use of EOs is a highly complex method. Their use as pesticides must first be analysed in a host/parasite environment, since allelopathic effects can be evident when applying EOs to plant tissues. Direct in vitro assays must be complemented by in vivo, soil-based experiments, in order to examine phytotoxicity or plant biotransformation.
With a few exceptions, natural nematicides, like the 5 nematotoxic EOs presented herewith, are considered less hazardous than chemical synthetic nematicides (Figueiredo et al. 2008; Moharramipour and Negahban 2014). However, when considering environmentally friendly pest management tools for root-knot nematodes, management of high volatility of EOs through formulation, potential processing costs for large scale production, and the availability of plant biomass on a sustainable basis to meet agricultural needs should all be taken into consideration if commercialization is to be realized.
To better assess the infection mechanism and the plant response to nematotoxics, laboratory assays using host/parasite in vitro cultures that mimic as closely as possible the field environment are being conducted.
Author contribution statement
JMSF conceived, designed research, conducted the experiment and wrote the manuscript. IS, BR and AMR conducted the experiment. CMNM and IA supplied M. chitwoodi initial inoculum and reviewed the manuscript. RB, MM and ACF supervised the work and reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.
References
Abbott WS (1925) A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J Econ Entomol 18:265–267
Abd-Elgawad M, Omer EA (1995) Effect of essential oils of some medicinal plants on phytonematodes. Anz. Schadlingsk. Pfl. 68:82–84
Andrés MF, Gonzáles-Coloma A, Sanz J, Burillo J, Sainz P (2012) Nematicidal activity of essential oils: a review. Phytochem Rev 11:371–390
Bai CQ, Liu ZL, Liu QZ (2011) Nematicidal constituents from the essential oil of Chenopodium ambrosioides aerial parts. E-J Chem 8:S143–S148
Barbosa P, Lima AS, Vieira P, Dias LS, Tinoco MT, Barroso JG, Pedro LG, Figueiredo AC, Mota M (2010) Nematicidal activity of essential oils and volatiles derived from Portuguese aromatic flora against the pinewood nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. J Nematol 42:8–16
Barbosa P, Faria JMS, Mendes MD, Dias LS, Tinoco MT, Barroso JG, Pedro LG, Figueiredo AC, Mota M (2012) Bioassays against pinewood nematode: assessment of a suitable dilution agent and screening for bioactive essential oils. Molecules 17:12312–12329
Batish DR, Singh HP, Kohli RK, Kaur S (2008) Eucalyptus essential oil as a natural pesticide. For Ecol Manag 256:2166–2174
Conceição IL, Cunha MJM, Feio G, Correia M, Santos MCV, de Abrantes IMO, Santos MSNA (2009) Root-knot nematodes, Meloidogyne spp., on potato in Portugal. Nematology 11:311–313
Council of Europe (2010) European pharmacopoeia. European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines, Strasbourg, p 241
Dias MC, Conceição IL, de Abrantes IMO, Cunha MJ (2012) Solanum sisymbriifolium - a new approach for the management of plant-parasitic nematodes. Eur J Plant Pathol 133:171–179
Douda O, Zouhar M, Mazáková J, Nováková E, Pavela R (2010) Using plant essences as alternative mean for northern root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne hapla) management. J Pest Sci 83:217–221
Echeverrigaray S, Zacaria J, Beltrão R (2010) Nematicidal activity of monoterpenoids against the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita. Phytopathology 100:199–203
EPPO (2012) Data sheets on quarantine pests: Meloidogyne chitwoodi. http://www.eppo.int/QUARANTINE/nematodes/Meloidogyne_chitwoodi/MELGCH_ds.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2014
FAO (2009) International year of the potato 2008, New light on a hidden treasure. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome
Faria JMS, Barbosa P, Bennett RN, Mota M, Figueiredo AC (2013) Bioactivity against Bursaphelenchus xylophilus: nematotoxics from essential oils, essential oils fractions and decoction waters. Phytochemistry 94:220–228
Faria JMS, Sena I, Maleita CM, Vieira da Silva I, Ascensão L, Abrantes I, Bennett RN, Mota M, Figueiredo AC (2014) In vitro co-culture of Solanum tuberosum hairy roots with Meloidogyne chitwoodi: structure, growth and production of volatiles. Plant Cell Tissue Organ cult 118:519–530
Figueiredo AC, Barroso JG, Pedro LG, Scheffer JJC (2008) Factors affecting secondary metabolite production in plants: volatile components and essential oils. Flavour Frag. J. 23:213–226
Gokte N, Maheshwari ML, Mathur VK (1991) Nematicidal activity of few essential oils against root-knot and cyst nematode species. Indian J Nematol 21:123–127
Golden AM, O’Bannon JH, Santo GS, Finley AM (1980) Description and SEM observations of Meloidogyne chitwoodi n. sp. (Meloidogynidae), a root-knot nematode on potato in the Pacific Northwest. J Nematol 12:319–327
GraphPad Prism® version 5.00 for windows, graphpad software, San Diego California USA. www.graphpad.com. Accessed 18 Jan 2014
Gupta A, Sharma S, Naik SN (2011) Biopesticidal value of selected essential oils against pathogenic fungus, termites, and nematodes. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 65:703–707
Hussey RS, Barker KR (1973) A comparison of methods of collection inocula of Meloidogyne spp., including a new technique. Plant Dis Rep 57:1025–1028
Ibrahim SK, Traboulsi AF, El-Haj S (2006) Effect of essential oils and plant extracts on hatching, migration and mortality of Meloidogyne incognita. Phytopatholog Mediterr 45:238–246
Kang JS, Moon YS, Lee SH, Park IK (2013) Inhibition of acetylcholinesterase and glutathione S-transferase of the pinewood nematode (Bursaphelenchus xylophilus) by aliphatic compounds. Pestic Biochem Phys 105:184–188
Kim J, Seo SM, Park IK (2011) Nematicidal activity of plant essential oils and components from Gaultheria fragrantissima and Zanthoxylum alatum against the pine wood nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. Nematology 13:87–93
Kong JO, Park IK, Choi KS, Shin SC, Ahn YJ (2007) Nematicidal and propagation activities of thyme red and white oil compounds toward Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Nematoda: parasitaphelenchidae). J Nematol 39:237–242
Kumrungsee N, Pluempanupat W, Koul O, Bullangpoti V (2014) Toxicity of essential oil compounds against diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella, and their impact on detoxification enzyme activities. J Pest Sci 87:721–729
Leela NK, Khan RM, Reddy PP, Nidiry ESJ (1992) Nematicidal activity of essential oil of Pelargonium graveolens against the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita. Nematol Mediterr 20:57–58
Loake G, Grant M (2007) Salicylic acid in plant defence—the players and protagonists. Curr Opin Plant Biol 10:466–472
Meyer SLF, Lakshman DK, Zasada IA, Vinyard BT, Chitwood DJ (2008) Dose-response effects of clove oil from Syzygium aromaticum on the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita. Pest Manag Sci 64:223–229
Mitkowski NA, Abawi GS (2003) Root-knot nematodes. The Plant Health Instructor. doi:10.1094/PHI-I-2003-0917-01
Moharramipour S, Negahban M (2014) Plant essential oils and pest management. In: Sahayaraj K (ed) Basic and applied aspects of biopesticides. Springer, India, pp 129–153
Ntalli NG, Ferrari F, Giannakou I, Menkissoglu-Spiroudi U (2011a) Synergistic and antagonistic interactions of terpenes against Meloidogyne incognita and the nematicidal activity of essential oils from seven plants indigenous to Greece. Pest Manag Sci 67:341–351
Ntalli NG, Manconi F, Leonti M, Maxia A, Caboni P (2011b) Aliphatic ketones from Ruta chalepensis (Rutaceae) induce paralysis on root-knot nematodes. J Agr Food Chem 59:7098–7103
OEPP, EPPO (2009) Meloidogyne chitwoodi and Meloidogyne fallax. EPPO Bulletin 39:5–17
Oka Y, Nacar S, Putievsky E, Ravid U, Yaniv Z, Spiegel Y (2000) Nematicidal activity of essential oils and their components against the root-knot nematode. Phytopathology 90:710–715
Pérez MP, Navas-Cortés JA, Pascual-Villalobos MJ, Castillo P (2003) Nematicidal activity of essential oils and organic amendments from Asteraceae against root-knot nematodes. Plant Pathol 52:395–401
Pestana MH, Gageiro JN (2000) Análise de dados para ciências sociais. A complementaridade do SPSS. Edições Sílabo, Lisboa
Pinkerton JN, Santo GS, Ponti RP, Wilson JH (1986) Control of Meloidogyne chitwoodi in commercially grown Russet Burbank potatoes. Plant Dis 70:860–863
Rohlf JF (2000) NTSYS-pc, Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system, version 2.1, user guide. Applied biostatistics, New York
Schenk UR, Hildebrandt AC (1972) Medium and techniques for induction and growth of monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plant cell cultures. Can J Bot 50:199–204
Seefeldt SS, Jensen JE, Fuerst EP (1995) Log-logistic analysis of herbicide dose response relationships. Weed Technol 9:218–227
Wesemael WML, Viaene N, Moens M (2011) Root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) in Europe. Nematology 13:3–16
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Prof. Dr José Barroso, Prof. Dr Luis Pedro, Prof. Dr Graça Miguel, Prof. Dr Helena Trindade, Dr Diara Kady, M.Sc.’s Sofia Lima, Natacha Moura and Marta Taveira (Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, CBV), Lic. Pedro Barbosa (Universidade de Évora), Dr Leandra Rodrigues (Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa), Dr Marta Mendes (Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa), Prof. Dr Kiril Bahcevandziev (Escola Superior Agrária de Coimbra), Cacial – Cooperativa Agrícola de Citricultores do Algarve, C.R.L., and Eng. João Sanches (Mata Experimental do Escaroupim, Instituto da Conservação da Natureza e das Florestas), for providing some of the plant material and/or for the technical support. Jorge Faria is grateful to the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) for the Ph.D. grant SFRH/BD/43 738/2008. This study was partially funded by FCT, under Pest–OE/EQB/LA0023/2011 and research contract PTDC/AGR-CFL/117026/2010.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by M.B. Isman
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Faria, J.M.S., Sena, I., Ribeiro, B. et al. First report on Meloidogyne chitwoodi hatching inhibition activity of essential oils and essential oils fractions. J Pest Sci 89, 207–217 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-015-0664-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-015-0664-0