Introduction

The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in more than 545 million confirmed cases around the globe, including over six million deaths (WHO 2022a). With the recent emergence of variants and re-emergent outbreaks, large numbers of new infections are set to continue in most countries and regions (Wang and Han 2022; WHO 2022b). Recent surveys showed that both the quantities and compositions of municipal solid wastes have been impacted by the current pandemic (Cai et al. 2021; Dutta et al. 2021; Fan et al. 2021; Ouigmane et al. 2021; Zambrano-Monserrate et al. 2020). In particular, the amounts of solid wastes generated from domestic sources have increased significantly (Nanda and Berruti 2021). In the USA, the volume of domestic wastes increased by about 30 percent through the first quarter of 2020, compared with those reported in the previous year (Helmer 2020). Main factors contributing to these changes include extended lockdowns, prevalent work-from-home regimes, reduced trips with most people spending more time at home, and an enormous amount of personal protective equipment, e.g., face masks and single-use products, being routinely used and disposed of in households (Tanakasempipat 2020).

Municipal solid wastes constitute a ubiquitous class of carriers for infectious agents and human pathogens, posing known risks of disease transmission during epidemics or pandemics, along with other types of carriers, such as sanitary wastes (Han and He 2021; Peccia et al. 2020; Sun and Han 2021a; 2021b), human biological matter (He and Han 2021a), personal use products (Han and Zhang 2020), food items and packages (Han et al. 2021; Valsamatzi-Panagiotou and Penchovsky 2022), high-touch surfaces (Chen et al. 2021a, b; Han and Zhang 2020; Wang et al. 2021), and virus-laden aerosols (He and Han 2021b; Sun et al. 2021). Many human pathogens, including fecal coliform bacteria, salmonellae, enteroviruses, protozoan parasites, noroviruses, hepatitis B virus, and antibiotic-resistant bacteria, are commonly found in municipal solid wastes and can spread to different hosts (Vaverková et al. 2020). The likelihood of contacting domestic wastes contaminated by human biological matter and inhaling aerosols during the collection and handling of municipal solid wastes make workers particularly susceptible to infectious agents, of which domestic workers, custodians, waste pickers, and waste bin handlers are at heightened risk. An earlier survey revealed that municipal solid waste workers in Denmark were six times more likely to contract infectious diseases than the average workforce in the country due to their exposure to higher levels of airborne pathogens (Poulsen et al. 1995; WHO 2004). Similar results were reported in Genoa, Italy, where the city's municipal solid waste workers showed a higher seroprevalence of hepatitis than found in the general population (WHO 2004). In a cross-sectional study (n = 545) at the University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, one of the largest hospital trusts in the UK, Shields et al. (2020) found that the housekeeping staff had higher seroprevalence rates of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibodies (34.5%) than healthcare workers at this facility (14.8–33.3%).

The earliest suspected case of municipal solid waste-mediated SARS-CoV-2 infection was reported in Sichuan, China, as early as December 2020 (Sichuan Daily 2020). Although there is no scientific study published to date on the municipal solid waste-mediated transmission of SARS-CoV-2, a report revealed that on September 1, 2021, a custodial worker was infected with the B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant of the novel coronavirus when collecting garbage from hotel rooms at a quarantined hotel in Guangzhou, China, which became the first known case of SARS-CoV-2 infection via contact with household wastes (CCTV 2021) (Fig. 1). In fact, only several weeks ago, a group of custodian staff at an international airport in Nanjing was infected by the Delta variant after cleaning the interiors of an international flight that arrived from Moscow and was inadequately disinfected prior to cleaning. Later investigations found that infections were caused by inappropriate undressing of protective clothing, improper wearing of rubber gloves and touching face and skin with rubber gloves at work (People's Daily 2022a). Since February 2022, one confirmed case of SARS-CoV-2 infection has been reported on a roadside waste picker with another suspected case on three municipal solid waste workers, raising further alarms on the municipal solid waste-mediated transmission of COVID-19 in the country (Hebei News 2022; People's Daily 2022b).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Two confirmed cases of domestic infections of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have been recently reported in mainland China. Government investigations found that both incidents were caused by exposure to municipal solid wastes. Details of the incidents are available in various news reports (CCTV 2021; Hebei News 2022). The Suzhou municipality recently issued a warning that some roadside garbage samples collected along highways showed positive results in nucleic acid testing for the novel coronavirus, the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2, Suzhou 2022)

Full size image

During the COVID-19 pandemic, household wastes contaminated with human biological matter may carry viable SARS-CoV-2 and other infectious agents and transmit these to workers or others in the vicinity during their collection, transport, bulk handling, and disposal. Previous studies showed that viable SARS-CoV-2 was found in a variety of human biological matter including respiratory tract secretions, saliva, other body fluids, and feces from symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals (He and Han 2021a). Under room temperatures, SARS-CoV-2 could survive for several hours or even a few days on the surface of plastics, metals, paper, and cloth, all of which are commonly found in municipal solid wastes (Aboubakr et al., 2021; Chin et al. 2020; EPA 2020). A recent government report found SARS-CoV-2 on roadside wastes discarded by drivers and passengers along highways in Suzhou, China (Suzhou 2022). Recent discussions revolving around this issue focused on reducing workers’ contact with virus-laden wastes (Ragazzi et al. 2020; Vaverková et al. 2020; Yousefi et al. 2021) or techniques for analyzing SARS-CoV-2 in soil runoff and leachates (Conde-Cid et al. 2021).

To date, however, there have been no studies on the persistence or infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 in simulated or real municipal solid waste-related environments such as household trash, waste bins, landfills, or open waste dumps. Meanwhile, there are no specific regulations to ensure the safe handling and disposal of municipal solid wastes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Major knowledge gaps exist in the current literature concerning the risk factors and unsafe practices in managing municipal solid wastes in an epidemic or pandemic scenario, which may present an under-investigated route of transmission for SARS-CoV-2 and other infectious agents in. In this article, we address these gaps by articulating the main risk factors in the municipal solid waste-mediated transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and other pathogens, practices on waste recycling, policies, and voluntary actions on risk mitigation in municipal solid waste management during COVID-19, by reviewing current practices of municipal solid waste management and the specific challenges confronted in the COVID-19 pandemic. We highlight the need for emergency protocols and risk mitigation strategies for the safe handling and disposal of municipal solid wastes in a public health crisis scenario.

Risk factors in municipal solid waste management during the COVID-19 pandemic

Human respiratory droplets, aerosols, mucus, and fecal matter residues carrying viable SARS-CoV-2 may contaminate personal items routinely being disposed of in municipal solid wastes (Fig. 2). One of the three principal ways of spreading SARS-CoV-2 is by touching the eyes, nose, or mouth with hands after contacting virus-contaminated surfaces, or 'fomites' (CDC 2021). Studies showed that SARS-CoV-2 survived for 2–7 days on the surface of wood, glass, stainless steel, and plastic under room temperatures (21–23 °C) (Aboubakr et al., 2021). These varieties constitute nearly one-third of the solid wastes (31.3%) found in municipal solid wastes (EPA 2020). During the COVID-19 pandemic, the prevalent use of personal protective equipment, e.g., face masks and disposable products, has resulted in significant increases in plastic waste in municipal solid wastes. In Italy, face masks and other SARS-CoV-2 personal protection equipment accounted for up to 1.4% of the total weight of municipal solid wastes due to their extensive use and disposal by the general public throughout the current pandemic (Ragazzi et al. 2020). A recent study showed that infectious SARS-CoV-2 virus could still be detected on the outer layer of a surgical mask on day 7 at room temperature (22 °C) (Chin et al. 2020).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Human biological matter carrying the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and common household items that are likely to be contaminated by virus-laden human biological matter after use by infected persons. The majority of these end up in household trash and are disposed of as municipal solid wastes

Full size image

In some communities, shortages of tissues and wipes were intermittently reported due to their persistently high demand by stay-at-home patients (Islam et al. 2021; Penteado and de Castro 2020; Tyko 2022), which are mostly disposed of in household trash. Meanwhile, the increased use of online purchases and food delivery services during COVID-19 lockdowns resulted in mounting wastes of packaging materials, food containers, and plastic utensils (Vaverková et al. 2020; Zambrano-Monserrate et al. 2020), creating enormous amounts of additional domestic wastes that are destined to municipal solid waste collection and handling facilities. Since many of these products are designed for personal use, they are easily contaminated by human biological matter, e.g., respiratory droplets, mucus, or saliva after use. During the bulk collection and handling of municipal solid wastes, contamination and cross-contamination are likely to occur in facilities and equipment storing and handling municipal solid wastes, posing direct risks to workers who may come into contact with contaminated objects and surfaces and others exposed to the immediate surrounding environment (Vaverková et al. 2020).

There are several unique risk factors for pathogenic transmissions in municipal solid waste-related environments (Fig. 3). During the bulk transport and disposal of municipal solid wastes, large quantities of dust and aerosols are generated (Anand et al. 2021a, b), which may carry viable SARS-CoV-2 and effectuate the transmission of COVID-19. In addition, short- and long-term exposure to elevated levels of airborne particulate matter and other air pollutants can exacerbate the risk of respiratory infections by SARS-CoV-2 and other pathogens by inducing specific vulnerabilities in the human respiratory tract. For instance, the overexpression of alveolar angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE-2) receptors on the surface of epithelial cells, i.e., the major cell entry receptor for SARS-CoV-2, and the exhaustion of Th2 immune responses facilitate viral penetration and increase host susceptibility to infections (Chen et al. 2021a, b; He and Han 2021b). Municipal solid waste transfer stations, waste dumps, and landfill sites are significant sources of atmospheric fine particulate matter, e.g., particles with an aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 μm or less (PM2.5) and particles with an aerodynamic diameter of 10 μm or less (PM10), bioaerosols, pathogenic bacteria, and antibiotic resistance genes (Anand et al. 2021a, b; Li et al. 2020). For instance, the movements of heavy dustcarts and site vehicles, the action of tipping garbage, waste compaction by bulldozers and crushers, and stockpiling of soil and rubble all generate large amounts of dust and aerosols at municipal solid waste landfill sites (Chalvatzaki et al. 2010).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Risks of exposure by workers, machinery operators, and animal and insect vectors to pathogens, including the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and other human or zoonotic pathogens, carried in solid wastes routinely collected from infected communities and households in the current pandemic

Full size image

Indeed, high levels of atmospheric particulate matter are often detected at municipal solid waste transfer stations and landfill sites, as well as downwind locations. Godri et al. (2010) reported that in London, the highest particulate matter concentrations were found in proximity to waste transfer stations experiencing large numbers of vehicles transporting industrial and household wastes. Measurements in solid waste disposal sites and transfer stations in Lahore, Pakistan, also showed high PM2.5 levels (127.1–403.8 µg∙m−3) at both sources and downwind (50 m) locations, with the latter consistently showing higher PM2.5 levels (Raza et al. 2021). The re-suspension of wastes from truck unloading, waste sorting, and mechanical equipment operating during landfill operations resulted in elevated levels of particulate matter emissions at landfill sites and downwind school and residential areas (Chalvatzaki et al. 2010; Ezeke et al., 2016). It is noteworthy that inhalable fine particulate matter can act as airborne carriers spreading SARS-CoV-2 to long distances far exceeding the social distances advised by public health authorities (ARC 2020; CDC 2022; Morawska and Milton 2020; WHO 2021).

Aerosol-mediated long-distance transmission of infectious agents has been well documented even before the COVID-19 pandemic. Zhao et al. (2019) reported that through airborne transmission, highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses from poultry farms could spread across states in the USA. In an earlier study, Alonso et al. (2014) found that the porcine epidemic diarrhea virus, a member of the Coronaviridae family, remained infectious after being harbored by airborne particles and transported over long distances. The genetic materials of the virus were detected at downwind locations of three swine farms at distances of 3–10 miles from the source. Recent studies confirmed the persistence of SARS-CoV-2 on aerosol particles, which maintained infectivity after 3–16 h under room temperatures (van Doremalen et al. 2020; Fears et al. 2020). SARS-CoV-2 RNAs have also been detected on indoor dust and outdoor atmospheric particulate matter (Renninger et al. 2021; Setti et al. 2020). It is, however, currently unknown whether dust and aerosols generated from municipal solid waste handling and disposal sites could carry infectious doses of SARS-CoV-2 and pose the risk of airborne transmission to workers and others in the vicinity or at downwind locations (Liu and Schauer 2021). To summarize, pathogen-laden airborne matter is routinely released from sites and activities handling or disposing of municipal solid wastes, which can contaminate the surrounding environments and travel to downwind locations, exposing workers and others in these environments.

Since most municipal solid waste collection and disposal sites remain open, animals and insects can be easily exposed to infectious agents carried by those wastes and become mechanical vectors (Fig. 3). In a recent discussion, Kumar et al. (2020) speculated that insects such as houseflies and cockroaches could be potential vectors of SARS-CoV-2. A more recent laboratory study showed that, after being exposed to SARS-CoV-2-spiked medium or milk, houseflies were able to acquire live SARS-CoV-2 mechanically and transmit genomic RNAs to the surrounding environment up to 24 h after exposure (Balaraman et al. 2021). This was confirmed in another study where researchers collected 156 houseflies from two hospitals and found that 75% of the body washout samples and 37% of the homogenized specimens were tested positive for SARS‑CoV‑2, suggesting that houseflies indeed acted as mechanical vectors for SARS-CoV-2 (Soltani et al. 2021). In addition to household insects, wild animals such as storks, gulls, bears, and baboons are often sighted near waste dumps and open landfill sites searching for human scraps (Bittel 2016). Since COVID-19 infection is effectuated by SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain and angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE-2) receptor, a diverse range of vertebrates can be infected by SARS-CoV-2 (He et al. 2021). Among the species frequently sighted near waste bins, feral cats and dogs have been tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, whereas a number of other wild animals are susceptible (van Aart et al. 2021; Bosco-Lauth et al. 2021).

Like municipal solid waste-dwelling insects, animals can act as mechanical vectors for spreading human and zoonotic pathogens. In fact, reports on animal vectors of municipal solid waste-borne infectious diseases were common before the current pandemic. Gulls, for instance, are known as common vectors of fecal pathogens in human excreta (Alm et al. 2018). Adding to the risks, studies showed that the feces of infected persons contained high viral loads of SARS-CoV-2, from symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals as well as recovered patients several weeks after their symptoms cleared (Cevik et al. 2021; Foladori et al. 2020; Jones et al. 2020). The foraging activities of these animals near human scraps and open municipal solid waste facilities make them particularly susceptible to infection or contamination by SARS-CoV-2 and other pathogens carried in municipal solid wastes, which may become hosts and/or vectors spreading infectious agents to long distances and other species through predation or mating. Without human intervention, which is often the case for pathogenic transmission in wild animals, the reverse zoonosis of SARS-CoV-2 may lead to rapid transmission in animals and, since SARS-CoV-2 is a recombinant virus, the cross-species transmission may facilitate its mutation and the emergence of novel strains (He et al. 2021).

During the COVID-19 pandemic, these risks may have been exacerbated by the enormous quantities of municipal solid wastes and the inefficient—often inappropriate—handling and disposal of municipal solid wastes (Aqil 2020; Brock 2020; CDT 2020; Semuels 2021; SHLW 2020; Tanakasempipat 2020). The massive numbers of stay-at-home patients, extended lockdowns, work-from-home regimes, reduced trips and outdoor activities, and stalled waste recycling programs have all contributed to mounting domestic waste generated in communities in the COVID-19 pandemic. Meanwhile, there is a dearth of sanitary service workers under the impact of the pandemic (Collectors 2020). Many municipal solid waste facilities are operating on reduced services due to a persisting shortage of staff, resulting in service disruptions, long turnover times, and overwhelmed facilities in residential communities (Fig. 4). In the UK, disrupted services of waste management led to a 300% increase in fly-tipping in some rural communities (Roberts et al. 2020). A widely overlooked risk factor from overwhelmed waste collection facilities, however, is that the large amounts of domestic waste exposed openly in community environments can facilitate the spread of COVID-19 and other infectious diseases. While this issue received little attention from public health authorities and research communities, the municipal solid waste-mediated transmission of human infectious diseases has been well documented prior to the COVID-19 pandemic (Table 1). Surface runoff, leachates, dust, bioaerosols, and animal and insect vectors near exposed domestic wastes could all exacerbate such risks in community environments. Overall, the increased amount of household wastes and challenges in the timely handling and disposal of municipal solid wastes during COVID-19 could exacerbate the risk of pathogenic transmission by insect and animal vectors.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Mounting domestic wastes overwhelming household waste bins and collection facilities during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. As more people stay and work from home and more single-use products were used during COVID-19, volumes of domestic waste increased substantially in residential communities. Stalled waste recycling programs and a shortage of staff in the waste sector also contributed to the situation. Inappropriate disposal of household wastes, e.g., fly-tipping, was sighted in communities all around the world, exacerbating the risks of municipal solid waste-mediated transmission of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and other pathogens to workers and others in the vicinity, including animals and insects. Workers under informal employment and with inadequate personal protection, which are common in developing communities, are at heightened risks of contracting infectious diseases, such as COVID-19, from household wastes collected from infected communities. Pictures are adapted from various sources on the Internet

Full size image
Table 1 Evidence and risk assessments on municipal solid waste-mediated pathogenic transmission to humans and animals
Full size table

Waste recycling during the COVID-19 pandemic

Waste recycling constitutes an essential part of the sustainable management of municipal solid wastes. The sorting and handling process, however, often requires laborious manual work with workers easily exposed to virus-contaminated wastes or aerosols, especially for unprotected workers under informal employment (Fig. 4). In some countries, informal waste reclaimers represent a substantial portion of the workforce in municipal solid waste handling and recycling (Nithya et al. 2021; Reuters 2021; Samson 2020). However, they lack both personal protection and training on the safe handling of municipal solid wastes in the current pandemic. Thus, they are at high risk of contracting pathogens, including SARS-CoV-2, via municipal solid wastes collected from infected communities (Aqil 2020; Reuters 2021).

Recognizing these risks, some municipalities suspended their recycling programs during the COVID-19 pandemic (Fan et al. 2021; Urban and Nakada 2021; WEIGO 2020; Zand and Heir 2021). These emergency responses, however, created new challenges by adding significant quantities of recyclable wastes for disposal, with the unintended consequence of putting numerous waste reclaimers out of work and income. In Isfahan, the third largest city in Iran where composting was used as the main disposal method accounting for 60–70% of municipal solid wastes, all collected municipal solid wastes were disposed of in landfills as recycling and composting were banned during COVID-19, which caused a drastic escalation in municipal solid waste landfilling volumes by 360% (Zand and Heir 2021). Some municipalities in India, Mexico, Colombia, and the USA deliberately chose not to completely ban recycling programs to relieve the escalating pressure on municipal solid waste landfills and incineration facilities while at the same time, ensuring the income of poverty-stricken population who rely on waste picking and sorting to make their living (WEIGO 2020). There exists a large population of waste pickers and informal municipal solid waste workers in developing countries. In Brazil, there are about 3000 unregistered dumps and landfills, which impact the quality of life of 77 million people (Cruvinel et al. 2019). The majority of waste recycling centers in Brazil rely on manual sorting (Fidelis et al. 2020). Waste pickers, mobile vendors, middlemen, and other informal workers constitute a major part of the municipal solid waste management system (Urban and Nakada 2021). In Bangladesh, approximately 40,000 informal waste pickers did much of the manual work required for waste sorting before recycling and further processing (Rahman et al. 2020). To conclude, some regulators are facing the dilemma of COVID-19 transmission in workers sorting and handling of municipal solid wastes for recycling, especially in unprotected workers and those under informal employment, and the ongoing need for waste sorting and recycling. In some countries, there exists a significant workforce who informally handles such work to make their living and income.

Policies and voluntary actions for municipal solid waste management during the COVID-19 pandemic

Public health authorities such as the World Health Organization, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in the USA, and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) in the USA have so far not issued specific regulations for the safe handling and disposal of municipal solid wastes during the COVID-19 pandemic (NWRA 2022; WM 2022). In the interim guidance for water and sanitation practitioners and providers, the World Health Organization and the United Nations Children's Fund issued a joint statement that there was no evidence showing that direct, unprotected human contact during the handling of healthcare waste had resulted in the transmission of COVID-19 (WHO & UNICEF 2020). However, the interim guidance advised on careful packaging of waste generated at home while caring for a sick family member by putting these wastes into strong bags and completely closing the bags before their disposal and collection by municipal waste services. Government organizations recommended general precautions to be taken for municipal waste operations during COVID-19 (CDC 2020; Das et al. 2021; EC 2020; OSHA 2021). In earlier guidance issued by the OSHA, the work safety agency advised that management of wastes suspected or known to contain or be contaminated with SARS-CoV-2 does not require special precautions beyond those already in place for solid waste and wastewater management, and that workers and employers should manage municipal, e.g., household or business solid waste with potential or known SARS-CoV-2 contamination like other non-contaminated municipal waste (OSHA 2021). No specific recommendations or updates are given for municipal solid waste workers in its current set of guidance (OSHA 2022a, b).

The National Waste & Recycling Association, a coalition of private-sector waste recycling companies in the USA, also stated that household wastes should not be considered regulated medical wastes, even if the person in the home has an infectious disease, such as COVID-19 (NWRA 2022). Waste Management, a major waste management service provider operating in North America, stated on its support page that management of waste suspected or known to contain or be contaminated with COVID-19 does not require special precautions beyond those already used to protect workers from wastes they encounter during routine job tasks (WM 2022). The service provider cited guidelines issued by the OSHA, the CDC, and the Public Health Agency of Canada in making such recommendations. Except for the adoption of personal protective equipment and precautions already being imposed prior to the current pandemic, no additional safety regulation was introduced for workers handling domestic wastes suspected to be contaminated by SARS-CoV-2 (Di Maria et al. 2020). The lax regulations created gaps in infection prevention and control of municipal solid waste-mediated transmission of COVID-19 and other infectious diseases, especially for those living in the vicinity of municipal solid waste handling or disposal sites or having regular exposure to municipal solid wastes, e.g., waste pickers, domestic workers, custodians, truck loaders, and machinery operators with inadequate personal protection and safety training.

The European Agency for Safety and Health at Work provided a brief list of good practices communicated by stakeholders in the waste management sector, which included social distancing, the use of personal protective equipment, including masks, and disinfectant products, and following protocols when put on and take off PPE to avoid incidental contact and contamination—a real risk factor as demonstrated in the Nanjing COVID-19 outbreak in China in July 2021 (EC 2020). It is currently unknown whether other public or occupational health authorities will issue guidance or mandates to mitigate risks associated with municipal solid wastes during COVID-19. Meanwhile, some nongovernment organizations have made efforts in raising awareness among workers in the municipal solid waste sector to mitigate their risks of exposure to SARS-CoV-2. In its current guide, the National Waste & Recycling Association offered role-specific guidance for drivers, helpers, sorters, and post-collection operators in the USA during COVID-19 (NWRA 2022). Women in Informal Employment Globalizing and Organizing, a humanitarian organization focusing on improving the livelihood of women in informal employment, provided guidelines on personal protective equipment that workers or trained volunteers involved in waste picking and handling have to wear in the current pandemic (WIEGO 2022). The Global Alliance of Waste Pickers advocated for safer working conditions and provided recommendations for waste pickers to protect themselves from COVID-19 (GAWP 2021). In general, wearing personal protective equipment in workplaces and following the protocols of ensuring good personal hygiene are advocated as the most effective approach for preventing viruses from spreading to and among workers in the municipal solid waste sector. To summarize, although there is a lack of mandatory requirements from public health authorities on preventing municipal solid waste-mediated transmission of SARS-CoV-2 for workers, some industrial associations and humanitarian organizations have issued specific guidance that could be adopted to mitigate such risks during COVID-19.

Conclusion

Municipal solid wastes contain large varieties of domestic wastes including personal products that are contaminated with human biological matter. Services and management of municipal solid wastes have been widely impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Surging volumes of domestic wastes, long collection intervals, disrupted services and suspended operations of waste recycling programs have overwhelmed municipal solid waste facilities during COVID-19, with inappropriate disposal, e.g., fly-tipping being frequently sighted in communities. The inevitable manual work and complex procedures required for municipal solid waste handling and disposal may expose workers and others in the vicinity to virus-contaminated wastes or aerosols. Moreover, cross-contamination is likely in facilities and equipment handling the collection, bulk transport, and disposal of municipal solid wastes, where workers may contact surfaces or objects contaminated with viable SARS-CoV-2 or other pathogens. Specifically, dust, aerosols, and airborne particulates generated by machinery operations may carry infectious agents, which can travel long distances to surrounding environments and downwind locations. Cases of COVID-19 infections have been recently reported in domestic and custodial workers, although they have not attracted widespread attention or regulatory concerns from public health authorities.

Although there has been no study to date on the persistence of SARS-CoV-2 in municipal solid waste-related environments, numerous types of infectious agents have been found in municipal solid wastes and there is ample evidence of municipal solid waste-mediated transmission of human infectious diseases by insects or animal vectors even before the current pandemic. Further, the widespread human infections of SARS-CoV-2 and the open, unrestricted nature of many municipal solid waste collection and disposal sites may exacerbate the risk of reverse zoonosis, i.e., spillover of human pathogens to animals. Advisories on the safety of waste pickers and other informal workers in the municipal solid waste sector have been made by coalitions and humanitarian organizations, although no mandate or public notice has been issued to date. Under the current practices, municipal solid wastes represent an under-investigated route of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and other infectious agents in the current pandemic. In light of these risks, we propose the following actions to be considered by workers, public health authorities, and the general public to mitigate the source-specific risks and ensure the safe handling of municipal solid wastes in an epidemic or pandemic scenario.

  1. 1.

    Line household trash bins with bags. Tie the bags before placing them into waste bins.

  2. 2.

    Use lidded waste bins and keep bins closed after throwing trash in them. Do not overload waste bins.

  3. 3.

    Provide additional waste bins in communities experiencing long service intervals or service disruptions.

  4. 4.

    Prohibit illegal dumping, e.g., fly-tipping of domestic wastes by erecting warning signs near waste bins and landfill sites. Install electrical fences around open landfill sites to reduce animal break-ins.

  5. 5.

    Suspend waste recycling programs in areas reporting active community transmission of COVID-19 or other infectious diseases. Control pests and insects in these areas.

  6. 6.

    Set up safety perimeters or working zones with restricted access to minimize exposure to leachates, dust, and aerosols from municipal solid waste handling and disposal sites by pedestrians or residents in the vicinity.

  7. 7.

    Require mandatory personal protective equipment for domestic workers, custodians, and other workers in the municipal solid waste sector who may have direct contact with domestic wastes. As a minimum, face masks, face shields, and rubber gloves must be worn at work. Coveralls are recommended for workers exposed to municipal solid wastes from infected households and those exposed to municipal solid waste-contaminated environments, such as truck loaders, drivers, and machinery operators at transfer or disposal sites. All workers must maintain good hygiene after work.

  8. 8.

    Where practical, issue temporary bans on waste picking, sorting, and other manual work on municipal solid wastes. Provide living subsidies for individuals whose incomes are severely affected by these restrictions.

Since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, the waste management sector has been tackling challenges while trying to mitigate the risks for its workers and facilities. The Solid Waste Association of North America recently called for the inclusion of the waste industry in coronavirus emergency response by government authorities (SWANA 2020). They stressed that solid waste management is an essential part of public services which itself needs to respond to the unprecedented situation and significant changes in volumes and sources of solid waste generated in the current pandemic. There is an essential role that citizens need to take to help public service providers overcome these challenges in this difficult time, that is, by minimizing the use of disposable products in households, recycling and reusing where possible, minimizing food wastes, putting needles and sharps in safe containers before disposal, and adopting good practices by properly bagging and disposing of household wastes into collection bins.