Introduction

In recent years, research on highly efficient photocatalysts with multi-pronged approach has been rapidly expanding. The increasing level of human activities has led to search for alternative technologies for environmental detoxification and energy production. Especially in the field of water treatment and purification, the organic, inorganic and microbial contaminants are increasing in terms of quantity, variability and risk factors (Kumar et al. 2018a). A new range of persistent and emerging pollutants have been evolved including polycyclic hydrocarbons, endocrine disruptors and surfactants. These are primarily found in aquatic environments and contaminated water or marine sediments (Sanz et al. 2003). Considering emerging and recalcitrant pollutants as serious issue for environment and human health, many mitigation techniques are investigated. Advanced oxidation processes, especially semiconductor photocatalysis, have been utilized to a great extent. This process provides an excellent and greener path for solving the energy and pollution issues (Fujishima and Honda 1972; Serpone and Khairutdinov 1997). Till date, semiconductor materials involved for photocatalytic applications include metal oxide- and carbon-based materials (Kandavelu et al. 2004; Weng et al. 2014). In previous times, the TiO2 photocatalysts or metal oxide photocatalysts were essentially used for the pollutant removal, hydrogen production, water splitting, inorganic synthesis and many more (Carp et al. 2004; Fujishima et al. 2000).

Although heterogeneous photocatalysis using metal oxides has been proved to be highly efficient in environmental detoxification and clean energy production, still many limitations are there. And as a result, this technology was not applicable to some processes like decontamination of highly polluted industrial liquid waste. TiO2 has been a revolutionary photocatalyst so far, but the main disadvantage is the limited use of solar spectrum and a high recombination of charge carriers. It is due to a narrower band gap as compared to ZnO (Carp et al. 2004; Fujishima and Honda 1972; Romero et al. 1999). Due to these limitations, there is still need for the modification of metal oxide-based photocatalysts. Hence, effective photoactive results can be achieved in the visible spectrum (Carp et al. 2004; Kitano et al. 2007). From the last few years, novel photocatalysts have been synthesized and tested which are possible alternative for metal oxides. These alternative photocatalysts do not originate from the modification of metal oxides like coupling, doping or other changes, but these are totally different compounds having different structures and compositions. Novel photoactive semiconductor mixed oxides of transition metals such as V, Ta or Nb and elements like Ga, Bi or In have been investigated as alternative photocatalysts (Kudo and Miseki 2009; Maeda and Domen 2007; Osterloh 2007). Some cation interchanged zeolites with large surface area solids have also been founded, even though these do not have semiconductor properties (Anpo et al. 2009). Bimetallic and trimetallic nanoparticles, ion exchangers, doped metal oxides, zero-valent metals and hydrogel-based photocatalysts, aerogels, metal oxide- and carbon-based composites have been explored (Kant et al. 2014; Naushad et al. 2018; Sharma et al. 2016a; Singh et al. 2014).

Metal oxides have proved to be of considerable technological and environmental importance as they find role in electronics, spintronic, energy production, energy storage, biological applications and environmental detoxification (Kumar et al. 2018b, c). Figure 1 shows graphically the strategic importance of the metal oxides. Metal oxides behave as excellent photocatalysts because of their electronic structure, light absorption properties and charge transport. Here we discuss metal oxide as a photocatalyst. The higher surface area, suitable morphology, band gap stability and reusability are the features of a good photocatalytic system. However, most metal oxides as titanium oxide are active in UV region only (Wang et al. 2016). Zinc oxide (ZnO) has been used as an alternative photocatalyst to TiO2. It has a comparable band gap, but it has a higher absorption efficiency, capturing a larger solar spectrum (Kumar et al. 2014). ZnO has been utilized in number of applications, as electronic, solar and photocatalytic processes due to its high stability, non-toxicity and electron mobility. Ong et al. reported that metal doping of ZnO improves its photocatalytic activity by reducing recombination by increasing trapping sites for electron–hole pairs (Ong et al. 2018). Many researchers have tried to improve the efficiency of these metal dioxides via doping (Dhiman et al. 2013, 2017) and forming composites with other metal oxides, etc. In addition to ZnO and TiO2, various other metal oxides as WO3, Al2O3, CwO2, SnO2, Co3O4, Bi2O3, etc. have been used successfully as photocatalysts. However, using these has certain disadvantages such as high cost and low quantum efficiency. The metal oxide photocatalyst not only responds to UV light but defected metal oxides also respond to visible light, and this process is widely used for environmental remediation (Ansari et al. 2013; Khan et al. 2014). This is also great milestone in the area of photocatalysis. Metal oxides are the most important class as it covers number of processes and of catalyst families which are used in industries. They are also involved in many reactions like petrochemicals, fine and pharmaceutical chemicals and biomass transformation reactions.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Applications of metal oxides in various fields

Limitations of metal oxides as photocatalysts

Metal oxide-based photocatalyst plays a great role in the removal of organic pollutants, saving environment, water disinfection, etc. because of its sustainable treatment technology, low cost and environmental friendly. Although advanced oxidation processes using semiconductor metal oxides have been found effective in degradation of persistent and some emerging pollutants, there is still room for further improvement and novelty. Figure 2 shows the shortcomings of a photocatalyst, which limits their use for practical and niche applications. Metal oxides possess many of these limitations. In addition, because of the valence band positions the photocatalysts suffer from the following:

  • Photocorrosion and self-oxidation.

  • These photocatalysts are costly, expensive and difficult to recover.

  • The photocatalytic region (λ < 400 nm) of some photocatalysts is narrow such as for ZnO and TiO2 (Kumar et al. 2014).

  • There is thermal instability in the visible photocatalytic activity of particles of some photocatalysts.

  • As compared to unrestricted catalysts, the photocatalytic activity of few catalysts is lower.

  • Not effective on diverse kinds of pollutants.

Thus, a need of various novel photocatalysts alternative to metal oxides was felt and new photocatalysts were explored. This review focuses on different classes of photocatalysts which have been used as alternative to metal oxides or have been used for improvement of metal oxides. This is so because the use of photocatalytic technology is now just not limited to degradation of organic pollutants but is used for removal of inorganic pollutants, metal reduction, photocatalytic sensors, clean energy production, removal of NOx, photoreduction of CO2, photofixation of nitrates, etc. Thus, new catalysts with multi-pronged capabilities have been explored.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Limitations of conventional photocatalysts, especially metal oxides. Each limitation has a pronounced effect on quantum efficiency and thus on the degradation rate

Alternative photocatalysts

Metal sulphides as photocatalysts

Metal sulphides being an important semiconductor class have been used in many new areas such as laser communication, light evacuated diodes and nonlinear optical devices (Yang et al. 2011). Different semiconducting metal sulphide nanomaterials have been reported to be useful for various optoelectronic devices because of their promising optical and electric properties. The metal sulphides have an empty valence band and have a quantum size effect due to their small effective mass. The above properties have a great contribution to the high charge mobility and visible light harvesting potential of metal sulphides. Many surveys have been done on the study of photoenergy conversion of metal sulphide quantum dots (QDs) including CdS, CuInS2 and PbS QDs (Shen et al. 2004; Vogel et al. 1994). Depending on their particle size, the valence band and conduction band potentials of the materials are tuneable (Kondo et al. 2015; Srinivasan et al. 2015). Metal sulphides are soothed of toxic elements. Therefore, the use of metal sulphides in practical application needs the designing of metal sulphides semiconductors using safe and abundant elements. This approach is done in the way as the ‘ubiquitous element strategy’. This strategy is used for the materials, used in industrial areas and bearable society (Takahashi et al. 2008). From all the elements in periodic table, we mainly focus on group IV-VI chalcogenides because they have good optoelectronic properties and high charge mobility (Ogo et al. 2008). Among these, the tin sulphides have unique characteristics, different valence numbers and sensitivity to visible light. These are used in electronic semiconductor devices and in small film solar cells (Burton et al. 2013). There are two chemical compositions of tin sulphide: (1) tin monosulphides and (2) tin disulphide.

SnS has narrow band gap than SnS2. The electron affinity and ionization potential of SnS2 are higher. The hydrogen production potential is smaller than the potential of SnS conduction band. The band dispersion and density of state of SnS and SnS2 showed that these both materials are implied transition semiconductors (Zainal et al. 1996). Metal sulphide semiconductors are used for the photocatalytic hydrogen production, because these sulphides has great solar spectrum response and higher photocatalytic potential (Zhang and Guo 2013).

Cadmium sulphide nanoparticles show strong absorption in visible spectrum because of ideal band gap of 2.4 eV (Shamraiz et al. 2016). However, its low separation efficiency of charge carriers limits its use as a photocatalyst. Various attempts were made by surface modifications as formation of nanowires, nanorods, etc. but only hollow spheres performed well in photocatalytic reactions. Fang and co-workers synthesized CdS nanoparticles with different morphologies as flowers, multi-pods, spheres and dendrites by a hydrothermal route. The photodegradation of rhodamine B was studied, and it was observed that dendrite morphology CdS exhibits highest activity. This was attributed to branched structure, small size and high surface area (Fang et al. 2017).

One of the important metal sulphides is monoclinic silver sulphide (α-Ag2S) with a band gap of ~ 1.0 eV, which has been recently employed as photocatalysts. Silver sulphide nanoparticles are usually unstable as because of decrease in size the surface energy decreases leading to cluster formation. So it is always advisable to control the size of these nanomaterials. This has been generally used for photokilling of microbes. Recently, Ag2S/Bi2S3 nanocomposites were used for photocatalytic inactivation of E. coli under solar light. It was found that hydroxyl radials were responsible for bacterial inactivation (Sun et al. 2013). Hu and co-workers in 2013 used solution proton alloying process for preparing mixed sulphide NaInS2 with tuneable band gap and utilized for hydrogen production (Hu et al. 2016). Zinc sulphide has a wider band gap of 3.6 eV and has a lower reduction potential of about − 1.8 to − 2.0 eV (Baran et al. 2015). Many methods have been used for synthesis of ZnS as solvothermal route, reduction, thermal evaporation, hydrothermal technique, ultrasonic and microwave method (Goharshadi et al. 2013). ZnS has been used for water splitting, CO2 reduction and organic catalytic reactions. Because of its reducing properties, it has been found suitable for photocatalytic CO2 reduction. However, hydrogen production efficiency hinders the use of ZnS in CO2 reduction. As a substitute to noble metals which are highly expensive, cobalt sulphide (CoxSy) has been used as a photocatalyst. It was reported that cobalt sulphide quantum dots enhance the electron–hole pair separation and provide active sites for hydrogen generation of 41.9 μmol h−1 (Yu et al. 2014). In a similar work, CdS-/Co3S4-coupled photocatalyst was prepared and a high H2 production rate of 1083.9 μmol h−1 was achieved which was higher than noble metal-based catalyst (Zhang et al. 2018a). Copper sulphide is a well-known p-type semiconductor (band gap of 1.2 eV) having applications in photodegradation of pollutants, sensing, medicine and solar cells. MoS2/Cu2S nanomaterials were synthesized in a controlled manner with a high specific area 60.512 m2 g−1. The composite catalysts showed high activity and reusability for photodegradation of pollutants and hydrogen production (Zhang et al. 2018d).

CoS is generally not stable because of aggregation. So many reports are there where hybrid materials are used for their use as photocatalysts. Copper sulphide has a strong visible absorption and has been used for photodegradation of coloured stuff as dyes. Many metal sulphides have been successfully synthesized and utilized for various photocatalytic applications for environmental detoxification. However, the sulphides do suffer from various drawbacks such as recombination, toxicity, low photoresponse. To overcome these drawbacks, many attempts have been made to modify the properties of metal sulphides. These include doping, coupling with highly effective and low toxic metal sulphides, loading of noble metals, shape control, crystal defect engineering, sensitization, doping and formation of heterojunctions or composite catalysts. Table 1 shows some photocatalysts based on metal sulphide materials with their photocatalytic applications.

Table 1 Metal sulphide-based photocatalysts with their photocatalytic performances

Metal nitrides, oxynitrides, non-metal-nitrides

Metal nitrides and oxynitrides have found their role mainly in photocatalytic and photoelectrocatalytic hydrogen production via water splitting and other ways. For the conversion of light energy into sufficient chemical energy, the photocatalytic water splitting into hydrogen and oxygen has been explored in recent years. It is one of the greener approaches and has attained attention for potential large-scale use of solar energy. Keeping band gap, band positions and photocarrier mobility properties in mind, the designing of novel or effective photocatalysts like metal nitrides/oxynitrides has been done (Takata et al. 2015). N-doping path has been used for many semiconductor oxides so as to capture visible active. Different groups worked for the preparation of zinc oxynitrides powder or thin films (Li and Haneda 2003). In the photodecomposition of acetaldehyde in the visible region, the photocatalytic activity of N-doped ZnO increased dramatically. But no such improvement was observed while using UV light. The hydrolysis of ZnO can be done by raising the nitrogen concentration without lowering the stability of the material. Many other approaches also combine the N-doped ZnO properties with other semiconductor metal oxides. Therefore, for the study of photocatalytic deterioration of acetaldehyde, MOX (M = Fe, W, V, Ce) have been studied. By adding V2O5 and WO3, the photocatalytic activity in the visible light of N-containing ZnO samples was enhanced (Li et al. 2004, 2005a). There are some nitride/oxynitrides photocatalysts used for water splitting through visible light. This is done because these oxynitrides avoid photodissociation which is not possible in metal oxides and had a good band gap. It is a fact that the 2p orbital of N possess a higher potential energy than 2p orbital of oxygen, which indicates that metal nitrides and oxynitrides may be promising photocatalysts. If the cationic components are not changed, then conduction band levels will not significantly be affected (Fang et al. 2001). As N3− and O2− have similar ionic radius, the half or full substitution of N3− for full or part of O2− in the oxide is possible in some cases.

Among nitrides and oxynitrides, boron nitride (BN) (Liu et al. 2017b), Si3N4 (Yang et al. 2018), GaON (Cheng et al. 2017), AlON (Du et al. 2015), Ga–Zn oxynitride (Adeli and Taghipour 2016), Ga–In–Zn oxynitride (Kamata et al. 2009) and LaTiO2N (Kasahara et al. 2003) have been found to be good photocatalysts. For synthesis of metal oxynitrides, nitridation of metal oxides in a NH3 flow is the most common methodology adopted. Ammonia decomposes on heating and formation of NH and NH2 radicals which abstract O from oxide and N is introduced. It was shown that when the nitridation occurs at mild conditions (ammonia flow rate—20 mL min−1, T—1123 K, duration—15 h). TaON is formed. But if NH3 flow is raised to 500 mL min−1, Ta3N5 is formed (Stampfl and Freeman 2005). In the nitridation process, the homogeneity is a major issue to be addressed. So for nitridation of oxide as homogeneously as possible, nitridation should be repeated with grinding and mixing halfway. In addition, uniform NH3 flow should be ensured by reducing a single nitride metal oxide and swathing it in fibrous materials as silica wool (Logvinovich et al. 2010). Most of the transition metal oxynitrides are thermally less stable (even at 100 K), so the decomposition temperature can be increased by high-pressure environment of N2 or NH3. In addition for producing high-quality nitrides, flux method is used which is a single-crystal growth method. In this method, inorganic materials or metals with a high melting point (called flux) are used as solvents. The precursor is used as solute and then crystals are grown from solution which is oversaturated by either decrease in temperature or lowering the solubility.

There is only limited choice of photocatalysis such as Ta3N5, TaON or many other material of oxynitrides family which are used for overall water splitting. Ta3N5 is a captivating photocatalyst with extended visible absorption (600 nm) and good ability for redox reaction which theoretically achieve the solar energy to hydrogen conversion efficiency of ~ 17%. It has good stability under illumination and under photocatalytic reaction condition (Nurlaela et al. 2016). For the overall water splitting, the first metal nitride photocatalysts which has been found is Ge3N4. Ge3N4 is also known to be polymorphic, having α, β, Ƴ and d phases, and these phases have different structures. The β phase is better when combined with a suitable co-catalyst and is used for overall water splitting purpose (Takata et al. 2015).

Tantalum nitride (Ta3N5) has an orthorhombic structure and is one of the most common photocatalyst employed for water splitting. It generates hydrogen from water by absorbing light up to 600 nm. Watanabe and co-workers showed that thermal treatment under high NH3 pressure can enhance the H2 production from methanol using Ta3N5. The treatment temperature was set at 823 K, and duration was 24 h with pressure variation from 10 to 100 MPa. When such treatment was done, the absorption was increased over 600 nm. The hydrogen production activity was enhanced (Yungi et al. 2006). Du et al. synthesized aluminium oxynitride (AlON) by a carbothermal reduction and nitridation method. AlON catalyst possessed a band gap of 5.2 eV with more of UV absorption. The catalyst was used for photodegradation of methyl orange dye under UV light irradiation (Du et al. 2015).

In another work, zinc-doped gallium oxynitride nanowires enriched with surface defects are fabricated via simple electrospinning and controlled calcination process under ammonia atmosphere. The catalysts were used for degradation of rhodamine B dye under visible light. The structure analysis of zinc-doped GaON showed that the surface oxygen vacancies were responsible for the high quantum efficiency (Cheng et al. 2017). Next photocatalyst of interest is lanthanum titanium oxynitride (LaTiO2N). This is abundant, non-toxic and inexpensive as compared to tantalum compounds. This also has hydrogen-producing capacity from water under visible exposure. LaTiO2N is generally synthesized by nitridation of either La2Ti2O7 or LaTiO3.5 which is a ferroelectric material. The precursor La2Ti2O7 is synthesized by a solid-state reaction between La2O3 and TiO2. Perovskites oxynitrides are another category of photocatalysts. LaMO2N (M = Ti, Zr), LaMON2 (M = Nb, Ta) are well-known oxynitrides which absorb near 600 nm (Ebbinghaus et al. 2009).

Perovskite oxynitrides can be synthesized by conventional nitridation technique where precursor is a metal oxide or mixture of metal, or where an oxide precursor and carbonate is thermally treated under NH3 flow. Zhang et al. prepared lanthanum tantalum oxynitride (LaTaON2) powders by one-step flux method and utilized for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Under visible light, hydrogen was produced on the surface of Pt-LaTaON2 which shows the catalytic activity for H2 evolution (Zhang et al. 2014b). Among non-metal nitrides, silicon nitride (Si3N4) has attracted attention with a wide band gap of ~ 5 eV. It has high stability, strength and low density. However, poor visible response limits its use which is generally overcome by doping and formation of composite catalysts or heterojunctions with low band gap semiconductors. Hexagonal boron nitride (BN) is a two-dimensional crystalline material which has similar structure to graphene (so-called white graphene). It possesses a wide band gap, high chemical and thermal stability, conductivity and large surface area (Lei et al. 2013). BN is not generally considered as a catalyst, but it is mostly used as a semiconductor in coupled form or used as a catalytic support because of its intrinsic properties. However, boron nitride-based materials have been used as catalysts in removal of organic pollutants (Wang et al. 2011), metal reduction (Xu et al. 2017) and hydrogen production (Huang et al. 2015). Table 2 shows various metal nitrides and oxynitrides for photocatalytic applications.

Table 2 Utilization of metal nitrides and oxynitrides and non-metal nitrides as photocatalysts for various environmental applications

Metal phosphides and black phosphorous

Phosphorus (P) is one of the most abundant elements on earth (Zhu et al. 2018) with several allotropes as red, black and white. Black phosphorous has gained interest since it was first used in field-effect transistors. It has a tuneable band gap of (~ 0.3 eV to ~ 2.1 eV) and is functional in near-infrared region (Buscema et al. 2014). But because of low band gap, black phosphorous suffers from the drawback of high recombination of electron–hole pairs. So in general, it is utilized as a co-catalyst or a part of composite catalyst or heterostructures. Zhu and co-workers synthesized 2-D hybrids of black phosphorous/WS2 for NIR hydrogen production. They observed that the rate was 21- and 50-fold higher than pure phosphorous and WS2 (Zhu et al. 2018). In another work, metal-free photocatalyst–black phosphorous decorated with g-C3N4 nanosheets was prepared for Cr(VI) photoreduction and nitrogen photofixation under visible irradiation. A nitrogen conversion of 347.5 μmol L−1 h−1 was obtained. The increased high charge carrier separation was due to the formation of C–P covalent bonds (Qiu et al. 2018).

Among phosphides, transition metal phosphides possess high stability and activity in addition to the abundance. In comparison with nitrides and sulphides, metal phosphides have been found to perform well for catalytic applications such as oxidation–reduction, aromatization, hydrogenolysis. Many routes have been involved for the preparation of transition metal phosphides. There include reduction of metal phosphines or phosphates by temperature-programmed reduction method (Lee and Oyama 2006). By conducting a reaction of amorphous Ni–B alloy with PH3, the Ni2P catalyst has been prepared. This catalyst has good catalytic activity in hydrodisulfurization of dibenzothiophene and is used for the synthesis of other metal phosphides like CoP, Cu3P, FeP and so on. Hydrodisulfurization of crude oil fractions is done by many phosphides, but Ni2P has good photocatalytic activity (Clark and Oyama 2003). Figure 3 shows the various phosphides used for photocatalytic applications in environmental treatment. These include phosphides of representative, transition metal, rare earth elements and the combinations.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Various metal phosphides as candidates for photocatalytic applications in environmental treatment. These include phosphides of representative elements, transition metals and rare earth metals

For the integration of extent and supported CoP, Ni2P, FeP, Cu3P catalysts, the following method is used. Firstly metal pyrophosphates precursors (Ni2P2O7, Fe2P2O7) were prepared under intense stirring by mixing the stochiometric amounts of potassium pyrophosphates (K4P2O7·3H2O) and metal chlorides (NiCl2·6H2O, CuCl·2H2O. Metal pyrophosphate was placed in tubular reactor and heated at 700 °C in flowing H2. The reaction proceeds for 7 h. Finally, the silicon dioxide supported Ni2P were introduced in SiO2 impregnation. The precursors were preserved at 80 °C for 3 h in vacuum oven (Zhang et al. 2014c).

Metal phosphides like MoP, WP and Fe2P were used for the study of hydro-treatment reactions. Due to high reactivity, the metal phosphides like MoP, Ni2P and WP catalysts are greatly used. But not much attention is given to Fe2P because of its poor activity in hydro-treatment reactions. The preparation of metal phosphides includes two steps: in the first step by combining stoichiometric quantities of metal salt phosphate precursors are prepared. In the next step, the phosphate precursors are transformed into phosphides according to temperature-programmed reduction procedure as described by Prins and co-workers (Yao et al. 2016). Solvothermal method is used for synthesizing metal sulphides using organic solvents as reaction medium. The morphology and shape can be controlled by solvothermal process. In a work by Callejas et al., iron phosphide was synthesized successfully by this method (Callejas et al. 2014). Fe(CO)5 was heated with oleylamine and 1-octadecene at 190 °C to form Fe nanoparticles. The Fe nanoparticles were than treated with trioctylphosphine at 340 °C for 1 h to form FeP. The synthesis can also be performed by solid-state phase reaction. Li and co-workers synthesized a series of NixPy catalysts by solid-state reaction of Ni(OH)2 and NaH2PO2 with a molar ratio of 1:5 in an argon atmosphere (Li et al. 2016a). O’brien group synthesized single-crystalline CoP nanowires with one-pot metal–organic method (Li et al. 2005b), while polycrystalline form was synthesized by solvothermal route (Hou et al. 2005). In a work by Mi and group, nickel phosphide was synthesized by solvothermal method at 180 °C. Nickel chloride and white phosphorous and sodium dodecylbenzene sulphonate were used as precursors. Ni12P5 was obtained in ethanol solution, while pure Ni2P was formed in mixed solvent water/ethanol (10:10) (Mi et al. 2011).

In a similar fashion, Co2P was synthesized using cobalt dichloride and white phosphorous as reactants and ethanol/water mixture as solvent. Urchin-like Co2P structures were formed and were used for the degradation of dyes (Ni et al. 2009). Boron nitride-decorated zinc phosphide nanowires were prepared successfully. The Zn3P2 nanowires were synthesized by chemical vapour deposition method. Photocatalytic potential was tested by studying the visible-assisted water disinfection by inactivation of E. coli (Vance et al. 2018). Among phosphides of rare earth metals, indium phosphide has been explored the most and used in electronics and high-speed communications. This is because of its good conductivity and metalloid nature (Yin et al. 2004). However, the photocatalytic activity has been studied by very few groups. There are several methods reported for synthesis of InP nanoparticles as laser, solution phase and chemical vapour deposition. In general, the indium and phosphide precursors (metal organic materials) were used for growth of InP. But these materials are quite toxic. So the solution phase methodology is the preferred one as it is facile route and also parameters can be easily controlled. Yu and group synthesized InP nanoneedles and nanotubes by solvothermal route. They reported that there was blueshift in nanoform as compared to the bulk form. The photocatalytic efficiency was tested for degradation of rhodamine B dye (Yu et al. 2017a). Cost-effective and less toxic metal-free photocatalysts have been explored but not fully exploited. Photocatalysts based on graphene, carbon nitride, boron phosphide, boron nitride, C3N3S3, boron carbon oxy nitride, etc., containing elements C, N, B, S, have demonstrated to perform in photocatalytic applications. So considering such phosphide-based metal-free catalysts, Boron phosphide is an interesting candidate. Boron phosphide (BP) is an important photocatalyst as it is composed of boron and phosphorous which are lightweight and abundant elements. In addition, it is a transition metal-free catalyst. BP is thermally stable and resistant to chemical attack. BP is a semiconductor with a band gap of ~ 2.0 eV. BP can be doped to form both n-type (excess P doping) and p-type semiconductors (excess B doping). However, n-type has higher conductivity. n-type BP was synthesized by a solid-state route and was found to be extremely stable under acid or alkali attack. It was reported that BP performed excellent for visible light-powered H2 production even without noble metals as co-catalyst (Shi et al. 2016). Table 3 shows various phosphides employed as photocatalysts.

Table 3 Phosphorous- and phosphide-based photocatalysts for environmental applications

Metal oxyhalides and halides

For the energy harvesting and environment remediation, many photocatalysts depending on nanomaterials have been investigated. Oxyhalide-based photocatalysts mainly include bismuth oxy halides such as BiOBr, BiOCl, BiOF and BiOI. The halides as catalysts include mainly silver based, i.e. AgCl, AgBr and AgI. Bismuth oxyhalides (BiOX) present a new interesting class of materials with a layered structure for energy conversion and environment remediation. They belong to family of main group of multi-component metal halides. As Cl, Br and I belong to same group so BiOCl, BiOBr and BiOI possess the similar properties. Unlike metal oxides TiO2 and ZnO, BiOX possesses variable band gap as 1.8 eV for BiOI, 2.8 eV for BiOBr and nearly 3.5 eV for BiOCl. In addition, various synthetic strategies lead to formation of BiOX in the form of nanorods, nanoflowers, nanobelts, nanosheets, nanoplates, thin films, etc., with different surface morphology, specific surface area and optical band gaps. For utilization of BiOX in industrial and environmental applications, various attempts have been made by various research groups for increasing the spectrum capture, decreasing the recombination and boosting the charge transfer.

The main approaches or synthetic routes for BiOX include hydrothermal, solvothermal, sonochemical, microwave, precipitation, emulsion and template method. However, for preparation of hybrid catalysts based on oxyhalides combination of these with other techniques as chemical vapour deposition can also be involved. Usually, bismuth oxyhalides tend to form a 2-dimensional layered crystalline structure, and for formation of 3-dimensional material, assembling of 2-dimensional nanosheets forming a hollow structure is required.

BIOBr nanosheets were prepared with (001) facet domination. These were utilized for photocatalytic reduction of CO2 under simulated sunlight. A CO production of 4.45 µmol h−1 g−1 was achieved because of high surface area, lower recombination and high reduction ability (Wu et al. 2017). With the help of these properties, they have photocatalytic applications for energy harvesting and environment remediation (Li et al. 2014). The layered BiOX semiconductor materials have a tetragonal PbFCl-breed arrangement. This structure consists of [X–Bi–O–Bi–X] slices deformed together by non-bonding interactions through halogen atoms. The halogen layers are stacked by non-bonding forces and interactions within [Bi2O2] emerge from covalent bonds. The bismuth oxyhalides have suitable band structure which helps in absorbing sunlight so that photocatalytic action reaction can be initiated. But due to the mismatch between the light harvesting and band gap, poor selectivity and less activity sites their applications are limited (Zhang et al. 2006). The strong interlayer covalent bonding and weak interlayer van der Waals interaction in BiOX structure give rise to highly anisotropic, electrical, optical and mechanical properties which makes BiOX suitable for photocatalytic waste water and particular oxidation of alcohol (Guan et al. 2013; Xu et al. 2011).

For the elimination of aqueous dyes under UV irradiation, good results have been obtained with bismuth oxyhalides. BiOCl has a layered tetragonal structure and has wide band gap which is higher than that of TiO2. Zhang et al. synthesized BiOCl powders by the help of acid hydrolysis of Bi2O3 in excess of HCl. MO degradation under UV light having photocatalytic activity was compared with TiO2-P25 (Zhang et al. 2006). Because of BiOCl presence, the MO disappears fast and this activity was done in two successive runs. The photocatalytic removal of RhB was performed over Bi2O3 and BiOCl nanofibres obtained by electrospinning. The obtained BiOCl has band gap energy of about 3.2 eV. The immense photocatalytic activity of BiOCl comes from delocalization of minimum conduction band, and high mobility to the photogenerated charges is granted by Bi 6p orbitals (Wang et al. 2008). Other than degradation of dyes, the BiOCl had also shown photocatalytic activity towards degradation of isopropanol.

Yb3+-doped BiOI photocatalyst was prepared by a facile hydrothermal method. 2% Yb3+-doped BiOI showed highest degradation of rhodamine B dye, which was 2 times the bare BiOI. In addition, the catalyst exhibited high photodegradation of herbicide isoproturon (Zhang et al. 2018b). In order to improve the photocatalytic activity of halides and oxyhalides, heterojunctions or composite catalysts are formed. Formation of heterojunctions is the most common methodology for improving the catalytic efficiency of a semiconductor and separation of photo-induced charge carriers. Recently, g-C3N4/BiOCl heterojunction was synthesized where nano-g-C3N4 was loaded in exposed facets (001) and (010) of BiOCl. The electrons transferring from carbon nitride to BiOCl have a longer time for exposed face (001) than for (010) (Li et al. 2015a). The two samples displayed different activity for degradation of methyl orange and phenol. This infers that exposing of facets in semiconductors can be an effective strategy for higher photoactivity.

A visible active photocatalyst AgI/g-C3N4 was synthesized by deposition–precipitation method. The composite catalyst was utilized for degradation of antibiotic diclofenac under visible light. The rate constant reached 0.561 min−1 when the molar mass ratio of AgI was 45% which 12.5 and 43.2 times higher than AgI and gC3N4, respectively (Zhang et al. 2017b). Similar other junctions were formed utilizing halides and oxyhalides for a better performance. Table 4 shows some of halides and heterojunctions for environmental applications.

Table 4 Halides, oxyhalide-based photocatalysts for environmental photocatalytic applications

Ferrites as Magnetically Recoverable Photocatalysts

In recent years, recovery and reusability of photocatalysts have been a major issue. In this regard, various suitable modifications of photocatalysts have been performed. One of them is introduction of magnetic photocatalysts. Magnetic nanoparticles have grabbed considerable interest due to their super-paramagnetic and ferromagnetic properties, high adsorption capacity and bio-compatibility. Particularly transition metal ferrites are the most important candidates. They are classified as spinel (MFe2O4), garnet (M3Fe5O12), orthoferrite (MFeO3) and hexaferrite (SrFe12O19 and BaFe12O19) (Kefeni et al. 2017). Among all these, spinel ferrites have been studied extensively for adsorptional and photocatalytic applications, especially in wastewater treatment.

For synthesis of spinel ferrites, two broad approaches are involved—bottom-up and top-down. The bottom-up options include hydrothermal, solvothermal, co-precipitation, microwave, gel-combustion and sonochemical. In hydrothermal method, generally FeCl3·6H2O or Fe(NO3)3·9H2O and a salt of metal are dissolved in water with neutral to alkaline pH. The mixture is then thermally treated at high temperature and cooled at room temperature. The material is collected by filtration or centrifugation. In the sol–gel process and gel-combustion method, solution of metal salt and citric acid is mixed to form a gel in water or ethanol. The homogenized gel is dried and sintered at varying temperatures (specific to each ferrite) for different times. In the co-precipitation technique, the metal salt and Fe(III) salt are dissolved in water and surfactant is added. In a neutral-to-alkaline pH solution, gentle heating is provided to precipitate the ferrite. A lot of structural changes can be observed with doping concentrations and dopants in ferrites which make them ideal for tuning (Kane et al. 2018; Raghuvanshi et al. 2018; Satalkar et al. 2018; Tatarchuk et al. 2017).

There are various applications of photocatalysis in various fields, like purification of contaminants from water (Kumar et al. 2014). Calcium ferrite (CaFe2O4) has been used for effective reduction of CO2 into methanol and other products. Ferrites possess high adsorbing power which makes them ideal candidates in photocatalytic applications used for environment decontamination. The semiconductor properties of photocatalyst make it very useful for the deterioration of organic contaminants which is helpful for the remediation of hazardous waste and polluted ground water and also has control on toxic air pollutants (Sharma et al. 2017b). The use of spinel ZnFe2O4 in photocatalysis has great advantage as it has covetable optical absorption with precise band gap of ~ 1.9 eV and low-cost excellent photochemical stability (Sun et al. 2012). This photocatalyst was used for the debasement of many dyes like methyl orange under UV radiation, methylene blue under real sunlight irradiation or visible light irradiation (Xie et al. 2013), Procion Red dye in the existence of H2O2/visible radiation (Anchieta et al. 2014). Magnetically recoverable zinc ferrite (ZnFe2O4) was synthesized by molten salt method and utilized for degradation of rhodamine B dye under UV irradiation (98% degradation) (Preethi et al. 2017).

Many nanostructured zinc ferrite-type essentials ZnXFe3−xO4 (X = 0.25, 1, 0.5) having average crystallite size were prepared by mechanic-chemical treatment co-precipitation. These zinc ferrite-type materials are used for the photocatalytic removal of malachite green dye in UV light. Optical absorption for the narrow band gap, excellent photochemical stability, electronic structure, low cost and strong magnetism are some advantages of using spinel ZnFe2O4 in photocatalysis (Sun et al. 2012).

Cobalt ferrite (CoFe2O4) as an excellent magnetic photocatalyst is used in biomedical, recording technology and electronics. The arrangement of spinel ferrite is in two different sites and depends on distribution of divalent ions (Co2+) and trivalent ions (Fe3+). When cobalt ion is replaced to cobalt ferrite having different divalent ions, it leads to different properties and useful applications. The physiochemical properties are enhanced by substituting various cations in cobalt ferrite (Mane et al. 2011). Copper-substituted cobalt ferrite having photocatalytic activity has the applications in degradation of dyes and antibacterial action (Mishra et al. 2012).

There is another ferrite photocatalysts, i.e. magnesium ferrite photocatalysts, which is used for the photoanalysis of methylene blue, and is an industrial level dye. This photocatalysis is synthesized with the help of solid–solid method in Mg:Fe ratio 1:2 by mol. Magnesium ferrite (MgFe2O4) is ferrite-based photocatalysts which has its support in both acidic basic medium and resistant and towards photocorrosion. It is non-poisonous and having good photochemical as well as chemical stability. It has less sensitivity towards photoanodic corrosion and has small band gap (Batista et al. 2010). Because of small band gap and less sensitivity towards photoanodic corrosion, the magnesium ferrite in its spinel structure can absorb visible light at about 2.0 eV (Kim et al. 2009). This material has number of applications like magnetic heterogeneous catalysis, sensors and also in magnetic technologies (Maensiri et al. 2009). Table 5 shows various ferrites and combinations as magnetically recoverable photocatalysts for various environmental applications.

Table 5 Utilization of ferrites as magnetically recoverable photocatalysts under visible and solar light

Carbon-based photocatalysts

The heart of the advanced oxidation processes via semiconductor photocatalysis is the energy conversion by the photocatalyst. Thus, tremendous effort is laid down on the designing and production of highly efficient photocatalysts. In recent years, carbon-based metal-free photocatalysts have emerged as alternative class because of their attractive properties as tuneable band gap, high surface area, abundance and low toxicity. These include photocatalysts based on B, C, N, S, Se, P and carbon-based materials as graphene oxide, reduced graphene oxide, carbon quantum dots, organic conducting polymers and graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4). Conducting polymers as polyaniline have been utilized for water purification by incorporating into hydrogels (Sharma et al. 2015) and combining with metal oxides (Kant et al. 2013). These polymers possess high conductivity, stability and facilitate separation and generation of charge carriers like semiconductors. Graphene oxide (GO) has been used as a promoter in the photocatalytic reactions. It has received attention because of its structural similarity to graphene and is open to modification as introduction of hydroxyl and carboxyl groups in various nanocomposites. The major structural difference is that the surface of GO has a lot of oxygen-containing groups, such as COOH, OH, C=O, etc. which increases its adsorption or loading potential (Dong et al. 2017a). However, GO is generally converted into reduced graphene oxide (RGO) during the synthesis process. Most of the nanocomposite catalysts include RGO only. The introduction of GO/RGO into the catalyst reduces the electron–hole recombination and increases in reactive sites and high absorption. It is widely used in different interactions as hydrogen bonding and electrostatic interactions in hydrogels.

Graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) has emerged out to be fascinating alternative to conventional photocatalysts. However, the discovery of polymeric carbon nitride goes long back in 1834 by Berzelius. It is a visible light photocatalyst, having two-dimensional structure, good chemical stability and tuneable electronic structure (Zhao et al. 2015). Graphitic carbon nitride is the most stable allotrope of polymeric carbon nitride. It consists of s-triazine units. As the s-triazine ring (C3N3) has aromatic character, these units tend to form a 2-dimensional polymer like graphite. The thermal studies of g-C3N4 reveal that is stable even at 600 °C. The conventional g-C3N4 shows absorption at ~ 420 nm; however, this shifts according to precursor and the methodology adopted to prepare.

The g-C3N4 is present in abundance and easily synthesized via one-step polymerization of cheap feedstock such as cyanamide (Wang et al. 2009), melamine (Yan et al. 2010), urea (Liu et al. 2012) and dicyandiamide (Zhang et al. 2012). Porous oxygen-doped graphitic carbon nitride nanosheets were synthesized by thermal polymerization of using urea and sodium oleate. The surface are of various compositions varied from 57.3 to 111.9 m2 g−1. According to the dopant percentage, the band gaps varied from 2.63 to 2.82 eV, thus facilitating the visible absorption (Chen et al. 2017). The sodium nitrate treatment has been done to alter the surface morphology. All the modified g-C3N4 samples had a visible absorption to different extents. The high viable absorption intensity of modified g-C3N4 was attributed to modification by sodium nitrate. The samples were used for photocatalytic degradation for tylosin. Table 6 shows the various carbon-based photocatalysts, their precursors and the photocatalytic application for which they are employed. Polydopamine/graphitic carbon nitride (PDA/g-C3N4) was synthesized by polymerization of dopamine onto surface of g-C3N4. 10%PDA/g-C3N4 was found to degrade 98% of methylene blue in 3 h. It was reported that PDA accepts electrons from semiconductor g-C3N4 and thus reduces recombination (Yu et al. 2017b). Lu et al. synthesized carbon and graphitic carbon nitride composites (C/CN) by a one-pot method using hydroxyl methylated melamine as template. The composite was used for visible powered degradation of methylene blue dye, and rate constant was 1.9 times for that of pure CN (Lu et al. 2018b). As an innovation, a novel graphitic carbon nitride photocatalyst was prepared by a facile one-pot thermo-induced copolymerization method using urea and tetracyanoethylene as precursors (Wang et al. 2018d). The catalysts were used for degradation of Orange II dye under visible irradiation with a 91% removal in 60 min. Ding and group designed a photocatalytic system based on g-C3N4 and mesoporous carbon for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution and photodegradation of methylene blue dye (Ding et al. 2018). A hydrogen evolution of 102 µmol h−1 was achieved, and the high charge separation efficiency was attributed to the presence of mesoporous carbon in the photocatalyst.

Table 6 Carbon-based photocatalysts, their precursors and photocatalytic applications

Xie et al. synthesized a surface charge modified g-C3N4 by protonation using nitric acid. Thus, they synthesized a 2D-2D type assembly of protonated carbon nitride (PCN) and graphene oxide, i.e. (PCN/RGO). Rhodamine B (RhB) and ciprofloxacin (CIP) were degraded under visible light with the highest efficiency for pCN/GO-5% (Xie et al. 2018). They assumed that the synergism of GO and PCN not only increased the interface area but also led to increased separation of the photogenerated charge carriers. Graphitic carbon nitride and graphene are used for hydrogels which are strong, stretchable and conducting. The photoactive hydrogels are a current area of interest (Sharma et al. 2018c). The hydrogel structure of a photocatalyst is beneficial as one gets the opportunity for improved loading, controllable reaction sites, increased strength, high surface area and high recyclability (Sharma et al. 2018a). In addition during in situ synthesis of photoactive hydrogel, the photoactive material can act as initiator for the polymerization reaction. Carbon nitride-based hydrogels were prepared by a facile route. The hydrogels possessed different shapes as cylindrical, sheet and tubular. The hydrogels were used for adsorptive removal of toxic dyes and photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. The H2 production is less as compared to the powder form, but it could be improved by adjusting the configuration (i.e. thickness and structure). In addition to hydrogels, aerogels have also gained importance in recent years for environmental applications. Three-dimensional graphene-based aerogels have been utilized as photocatalysts with high solar spectrum capture because of their unique structure and properties. For synthesis of grapheme-based aerogels, graphene oxide (GO) is usually used as a precursor which can be hydrothermally converted into graphene and assembled into three-dimensional network with hydrogen bonding and ππ stacking. However, the electrical conductivity of GO is decreased considerably in an aerogel network. In a related work, commercial Elicarb graphene (EGR) was hybridized with GO to form a three-dimensional aerogel—Reduced graphene oxide@Elicarb Graphene-Eosin Y (RGO@EGR-EY). The aerogel with high electrical conductivity was utilized for visible-assisted photoreduction of Cr(VI). RGO@15%EGR-2EY aerogel reduced 98% of Cr(VI) in 20 min of visible exposure (Lu et al. 2018a). Similarly, many other carbon-based metal-free photocatalysts have been designed and synthesized. Some individual catalysts have limitations like low conductivity, which is generally overcome by hybridizing with other catalysts for a better performance. However, it may be the fact they have lower activity than metal-free catalysts, but their cost-effectiveness, abundance, high surface area, non-toxicity and bio-compatibility make them ideal.

Perovskite-based photocatalysts

Perovskite-based photocatalyst has a great interest in the area of photocatalysis. Perovskites are the class of compounds having general formula ABO3 in which A site is engaged by larger cation and B site is engaged by smaller cation. Perovskites have many crystal structures varying from cubic (high symmetry) to triclinic (very low symmetry). Various solid-state reaction routes from oxides, hydrothermal, sol–gel, high-pressure techniques, vapour deposition methods have been utilized for the synthesis of perovskites. Different procedures can lead to formation of same perovskite but with different symmetries and even a different structure too. Ceramic route was the first technique used for the synthesis in which mixture of oxides was treated at high temperatures and processed later by ceramic powder methods.

Perovskite-based photocatalysts are PbZrO3, BaTiO3, PbTiO3 and these are normally used piezoelectric compounds (Kanhere and Chen 2014). Multi-ferric behaviours is shown by BiFeO3 thin films (Nuraje and Su 2013), whereas SrTiO3 has excellent photocatalytic properties. Ag-modified lanthanum cobaltite (LaCoO3) perovskite was prepared by hydrothermal route. The morphology analysis shows that the tetragonal shape of bare LaCoO3 changes into square with incorporation of Ag. Ag–LaCoO3 shows a good photocatalytic activity by degrading 99% of methylene blue dye (MB) in 10 min (Jayapandi et al. 2018). In a work by Dükkanc, LaFeO3 perovskite was synthesized by sol–gel method by calcination at 500 °C. The catalyst was utilized for degradation of endocrine disruptor (BPA). The degradation was studied by using sonochemical, photocatalytic, Fenton techniques and combination of these for getting insight into the effect of each onto degradation of BPA. Though LaFeO3 shows a good photocatalytic activity, in this work it was found that it shows better results under sonochemical route (Dükkancı 2018).

Core–shell SrTiO3/graphene materials were prepared by chemical vapour deposition method (He et al. 2018). The photocatalytic activity was tested by degradation of rhodamine B (RhB) under UV irradiation. Sm-doped BiFEO3 catalyst was formed by sol–gel method (Hu et al. 2017). The effect of dopant amount (1, 3, 5, 7 and 10%) on photodegradation of methyl orange (MO) under visible light was studied. The band gaps were found to be 0.17, 2.15, 2.14, 2.13, 2.12 and 2.06 eV for 0, 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10% doping, respectively. The degradation was highest (86%) when doing was 3% which was 1.5 times than bare BiFeO3. Due to the large recyclability and near-zero carbon emission of hydrogen, it is the biggest potential alternative to carbon-based fossil fuels. Fossil fuels are not sufficient for the demand of energy in future. By volume, hydrogen has low energy content but is high energy content among the common. Many attempts have been made for the generation of hydrogen by using photocatalytic water splitting approach and it is the best ways among renewable sources (Chen et al. 2010). Perovskites are very stable crystalline compounds having highly flexible compositions and used for photocatalytic water splitting (Weidenkaff 2004). Because of redox properties of perovskites, they are used for photocatalytic hydrogen generation. Many photocatalysts such as oxides, mixed oxides, nitrides, sulphides, phosphides have been employed so far for photocatalytic water splitting or H2 generation from other precursors. However, it is still a challenge to find a material with exceptional activity and can be used without precious metals as co-catalysts. Among various catalysts other than metal oxides, perovskites have been widely utilized and explored for generation (Moniruddin et al. 2018). Perovskites have some advantages over the other catalysts as:

  • Suitable band edge potential—for H2 evolution on cathode and O2 on anode.

  • Flexibility of structure—A or B site for doping.

  • Ferroelectric and piezoelectric properties.

Potassium niobate (KNbO3) exhibits unique properties in optic, acoustic, electronic and piezoelectric applications. Carbon-doped KNBO3 photocatalyst was prepared by combination of hydrothermal route and post-calcination. The catalyst possessed excellent photocatalytic activity with high H2 production under simulated solar light. C-KNbO3 calcined at 350 °C showed highest photocatalytic hydrogen generation (211 µmol g−1 h−1) which is 42 times that of bare KNbO3. The catalyst also performs well under visible light illumination (Yu et al. 2018).

LaTi2O7 is formed by slabs with perovskites like array and separated by La3+ layers, and this shows a photonic efficiency of 12% which is used for water dissociation in H2 and O2 (Kim et al. 2005). For increasing the photoactivity of this semiconductor, it was doped with BaO so that its efficiency reached up to 50% with the help of a NaOH solution. Table 7 lists some of perovskite-based photocatalysts for various environmental catalysis applications. Oxides with perovskites structure are promising in various applications. Due to their crystalline flexible symmetry, incorporation of different cations leads to formation of materials with different properties. It is thus possible to tune their properties as structure, shape and band gap, which promises a splendid future in photocatalytic applications. Figure 4 represents the different types of alternative photocatalytic other than metal oxides.

Table 7 Some perovskite-based photocatalysts with their band gap and applications
Fig. 4
figure 4

Various photocatalysts that are used as alternative to metal oxide photocatalysts. CNT: carbon nanotubes

Advantages over metal oxides

Metal oxide-based photocatalysts have a great technological importance in electronics and in environmental remediation. In fact, firstly these oxides were mainly used for each environmental remediation, and among these TiO2 and ZnO, WO3 was mainly used. But the upcoming needs and demands of earlier technology and environment pollution and other organic pollutants affecting aquatic lives and human lives lead to search for some other photocatalysts based on metal sulphides, nitrides, ferrites, chalcogenides, oxyhalides and so on as they have good novel photocatalytic activities as compared to metal oxide-based photocatalysts (Kumar et al. 2017b). The good features of photocatalytic system are desirable band gap, high surface area, suitable morphology, stability and reusability (Kumar et al. 2017a; Sharma et al. 2018b). And these above-mentioned photocatalysts have been synthesized and used as alternative to metal oxide-based photocatalysts.

These materials are not particularly derived from metal oxides; they are completely different compounds with different structures and compositions. Mixed oxides of metal like Nb, V or Ta are investigated as alternative photocatalysts. Sulphide- and nitride-based photocatalysts are used for photoactivity in visible range (Kudo and Miseki 2009). Other alternative photocatalysts are:

  • Nitride-based photocatalyst, i.e. tantalum nitride having optical properties, fundamental parameters, electronic properties and band gap position, is used for the photocatalytic water redox reaction.

  • Perovskite-based photocatalyst is used for the conversion of glucose to H2 and in visible light photocatalysis.

  • Nowadays for the degradation of synthetic dyes, the ferrite-based photocatalyst such as cobalt ferrite, magnesium ferrite, zinc ferrite is used, because these photocatalysts have high photocatalytic activity under visible light.

  • Metal sulphide-based photocatalysts such as ZnS, SnS are used for photocatalytic hydrogen production because these sulphides have good solar spectrum response.

New, cheap and hybrid photocatalysts have been achieved, which can be used for contaminate removal, microbial disinfection and energy production. They have proven to be more effective in visible and natural sunlight and have reduced toxicity too. Thus, a shift has been made from conventional photocatalysts to tuneable smart hybrid systems which offer more.

Environmental applications

The major works reported in the field of metal oxide free photocatalysts for environmental detoxification have been studied in the previous sections. This section presents an overview of the type of environmental applications for which these catalysts are being used for a better insight. These include organic and inorganic contaminant removal from water, CO2 photoreduction, NOx removal, heavy metal reduction, photokilling of microbes and H2 production. Figure 5 graphically shows the applications of these alternative photocatalysts in environmental detoxification and clean energy production.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Environmental applications of alternative photocatalysts. Noteworthy, each class cannot be applied in all these applications with excellent results. Hence, combinations are generally made by researchers for better results or multi-field applications

Aqueous pollutants remediation

Increasing exploitation of resources and rising pollution has decreased the water and air quality. Clean water which is a vital prerequisite of life has been polluted with big challenges in developing economies. Various contaminants such as organic, inorganic and microbial have risen to alarming levels posing threat to aquatic and human life. The major toxic effluents in water bodies include dyes, phenols, cosmetics, personal care products, paints, hospital discharges, pharmaceutical wastes, heavy metals and pesticides, which are generally carcinogenic and endocrine disrupting (Kahlon et al. 2018; Sharma et al. 2017e). In addition to dyes and phenols, antibiotics and other drugs have led to high contamination and increase in drug-resistant bacteria which is dangerous for animal and human life. Heterogeneous photocatalysis using semiconductors have been most promising technology for water treatment because it ensures complete mineralization of the contaminants.

Physical approaches like adsorption, flocculation, reverse osmosis are non-destructive, transfer the pollutants to different media and give rise to secondary pollution (Belver et al. 2006). The advanced oxidation process has a potential for pollutant degradation and wastewater treatment (Bouzaida et al. 2004). The organic pollutants act as substrate for bacterial growth in natural water mingled with heavy metals such as Fe, Pb, Mn making it harder to remove. Advanced oxidation process has also many applications in this purpose. This process decreases the organic content in water and has advantage that it does not leave any toxic by-products or waste (Kumar et al. 2015; Sharma et al. 2017a). Photocatalysis is a very effective tool to treat organic pollutants in air. This process of photocatalysis may be employed for less humidified indoor environments (Jo and Kim 2009). Many indoor air pollutants such as radiations, formaldehyde and VOC cause various serious health problems. For the removal of air pollution through traffic, the photocatalytically active materials can be added to surface of pavement and building materials (Chen and Poon 2009).

Nowadays researchers are investigating photocatalytic materials other than from metal oxides for water disinfection. There are many organic pollutants such as organic dyes which contaminating the water (Sharma et al. 2017d; Surendhiran et al. 2017). The thermodynamic requirements of the photocatalyst for pollutant degradation are differ from those used in water splitting. For the mineralization of water, the reduction potential of electron in conduction band must be negative, so that it reduces adsorbed molecular oxygen to superoxide. And in valence band their reduction potential must be positive to react with organic matter (Sharma et al. 2017c). Work on water detoxification is mainly focused on other oxide compounds. New research other than TiO2-based photocatalyst is being done for the water disinfection (Miyauchi et al. 2002). Photocatalysts based on metallate are also used for this purpose under visible light illumination. BiVO4 is the first metallate used for the disinfection of water (Ammar et al. 2006). Tungstate-based photocatalysts are also used for the degradation of aqueous pollutants. The other photocatalysts are ZnWO4, PbWO4, and Bi2WO6. But ZnWO4 and PbWO4 have lower activity than Bi2WO6 (Ye et al. 2008).

Bi2WO6 nanocrystals have various morphologies as nanoflower, nanoplates, knot shape, rod like and were synthesized by hydrothermal method by varying pH, solvents and temperatures. Photocatalytic activity of the photocatalysts was evaluated by degradation of ceftriaxone sodium under visible light irradiation (Zhao et al. 2018b). In another work, silver/silver chloride/exfoliated graphite (Ag/AgCl/EG) photocatalyst was prepared by precipitation and photoreduction route. The catalyst exhibited efficient visible light photocatalytic activity with 99.5% rhodamine B and 89.1% phenol removal (Gou et al. 2018). In a modification of g-C3N4, a pn-type Bi5O7I/g-C3N4 nanoheterojunction was prepared by template and annealing-hydrothermal co-deposition method (Dong et al. 2018). The photocatalytic activity of Bi5O7I/g-C3N4 is about 30 times that of the unmodified sample.

CO2 reduction, NOx removal and heavy metal reduction

The increasing levels of CO2 in atmosphere due to industrial pollution and extensive use of fuels have aroused a great concern because of global warming. The exhaustive exploitation of fuels has led to energy crisis and demand for novel ideas for clean energy production. The photocatalytic reduction of CO2 into CO, CH4, CH3OH, etc. has been the most effective and inexpensive route. In a typical reaction, the holes from valence band generate protons (E° = 0.82 eV vs. NHE). Secondly, CO2 is reduced by electrons from conduction band (E° = −0.24 eV).

Photocatalysts with zeolites and mesoporous material are also used for treating gaseous contamination. As the properties of zeolites are not good for photocatalytic activity, some remarkable results are obtained in gas phase treatment. Artificial photosynthesis of hydrocarbons from CO2 and water is also a good matter of research. There are many problems rising because of the increase in concentration of CO2 in atmosphere. Many references tell that the CO2 photoreduction is only possible with TiO2-based photocatalysts, but it is not only the material for this purpose. From the carbon dioxide reduction process, methanol is the valuable product because it is directly used an alternative fuel by chemical industry. Higher yield is required over NiO and ZnO then over to TiO2 for the photoalteration of carbon dioxide into methanol in aqueous phase (Yahaya et al. 2004). In the photoreduction of carbon dioxide, the Ti-incorporated mesoporous silica has more activity than bulk TiO2 and generated methanol and methane under UV irradiation (Hwang et al. 2005; Su et al. 2016). However, it cannot be considered as a pure photocatalytic process. For the CO2 photoreduction process, methanol is the most valuable product because it can be used as an alternative fuel or building block by the industry. Higher yields were obtained over NiO and ZnO than over TiO2 for the photoconversion of CO2 into methanol in aqueous phase (Yahaya et al. 2004). Highly photoactive and stable photocatalysts 2D/2D zinc vanadium oxide-reduced Graphene Oxide ZnV2O6/RGO were synthesized by hydrothermal method (Bafaqeer et al. 2018).

The catalysts were used for photoreduction of CO2 into CH3OH, CH3COOH and HCOOH under visible light. The yield of CH3OH is 3254 µmol g−1, which was 5.5 times than that of ZnO/V2O5. The selectivity of catalyst for CH3OH is 68.89%, which is quite high as compared to popular metal oxides. Metal-based semiconductors have been used extensively for CO2 reduction. Non-metal-based and metal-free semiconductors have activity comparable to metal-based photocatalysts. Among all metal-free semiconductors, g-C3N4 is the most promising one. In a related work, Cu-modified g-C3N4 (Cu/g-C3N4) as photocatalysts was synthesized for simulated solar energy powered conversion of CO2 into CH4 and CH3OH. The yield of CH4 by 3% Cu/g-C3N4 was 109 mol g−1 h−1, which was significantly higher than pure g-C3N4 (Tahir et al. 2017). In another modification to g-C3N4, LaPO4/g-C3N4 core–shell nanowires via hydrothermal technique and used for photocatalytic CO2 reduction. The coating leads to high absorption and higher charge transfer. A maximum CO amount of 0.433 mol was produced in 1 h using 30 mg photocatalyst (Li et al. 2017a). Metal nitrides are also promising catalysts for CO2 conversion into fuels without any noble metal as co-catalyst. In bismuth-modified Ta3N5 (Ta3N5/Bi), the doping leads to higher CH4 production which is 5 times more than bare Ta3N5 (Wang et al. 2018a). Pollutants such as NOX are apparently removed from environment as they are causing harm to living things in the world. These inorganic compounds like (NOx, NO, etc.) present at ppm concentration in air. The photocatalytic treatment of air centres on the mineralization of organic compounds (Demeestere et al. 2007) receives less attention as compared to other applications of alternative photocatalyst. Mixed oxynitrides, oxyhalides and carbide-based photocatalysts are used for the removal of gaseous contaminants. SrTiO3 is an interesting photocatalysts, but it is only activated in UV region because it has high band gap (Chen et al. 2009). For the destruction of NO, the SrTiO3 has been doped with N, F or La. As compared to TiO2, the photocatalytic performance of this material was 1.4 times greater.

The semiconductor photocatalysis is also used for abatement of other toxic gases as nitrogen oxides (NOx). The air pollution due to NOx, i.e. NO and NO2 has increased alarmingly due to extensive combustion of fuels and industrial pollution. The minimum levels of NOx as set by national and international regulating agencies have surpassed in major cities of the world. NOx is the major cause of acid rains and photochemical smog, which are an environmental and human health concern. Removal of NO is necessary as it is major source for other NOx gases. Conventional methods to remove NO include catalytic decomposition, reduction and wet scrubbing. However, these methods are applicable where the concentration of NO is high. But for lower levels as parts per billion (ppb), these techniques become less effective and costly too. Photocatalytic decomposition of NO is an emerging and promising field. During a semiconductor photocatalytic reaction, the hydroxyl and superoxide radicals produce NO2 and NO3 which may also be toxic. Thus, the presence of hydrogen in reaction mixture leads to the formation of N2 and NH3. This solves the problem of release of highly toxic gases and synthesis of NH3 by photocatalytic process. The two-dimensional BiOCl/Bi12O17Cl2 nanojunction was fabricated by in situ method and was used for removal of NO at ppb level (Zhang et al. 2018c). The optical band gaps of BiOCl, Bi1O17Cl2 and BiOCl/Bi12O17Cl2 were found to be 3.20, 2.43 and 2.77 eV, respectively. 37.2% of NO was removed in the presence of the nanojunction.

SrTiO3 catalyst decorated with SrCO3 was prepared by one-step in situ pyrolysis and was used for the photocatalytic removal of NO. SrCO3 not only increased the NO removal but also helped in keeping SrTIO3 activated during the process. Forty-seven percentage removal efficiency in 12 min was achieved (Jin et al. 2018). This enhanced activity due to the formation of a junction is similar to the surface-deposited noble metals. N-doped Bi2O2CO3/graphene oxide composite was synthesized by one-pot hydrothermal route. The catalysts were used to degrade NOx in visible light with the sample containing 1% GO showing the highest activity. As compared to pure GO, the N-doping improves the photocatalytic degradation of NO. This leads to 74.6% NO removal and complete inhibition of NO2 generation. The high activity is ascribed to extended absorption and high separation of charge carriers (Chen et al. 2018).

Among other contaminants, heavy metal ions which are generally present in waste water and air have acute toxicity and dangerous for ecosystem (Sharma et al. 2016b). Cr(VI) is a major contaminant these days because of its carcinogenic and teratogenic nature (Kumar et al. 2016). It has been regarded as one of the priority pollutants. On the other hand, Cr(III) is an essential trace element. One of the strategies for removal of Cr(VI) is adsorption; however, it just transfers the medium and potential danger still remains in the system. Other methods include chemical reduction and electrodeposition, but these are complex and expensive. Photocatalytic reduction of Cr(VI) into Cr(III) is an preferred method because it is fast, effective and cheap. In particular, reduction in the presence of natural sunlight is an attractive technology. The electrons generated on photoexposure lead to the formation of Cr(III) and are effective in acidic medium.

Among metal-free semiconductors, g-C3N4 is an promising candidate for the Cr(VI) reduction. The conduction band of g-C3N4 is usually more negative than that required for Cr(VI)/Cr(III), i.e. − 1.3 eV (vs. NHE). Hence, thermodynamically it can easily reduce. However, the band edge can be shifted to more negative by suitable structural modification or by doping.

Sulphur-doped g-C3N4 microspheres were prepared from condensation of trithiocyanuric acid. The photocatalytic activity was tested for reduction of Cr(VI) in visible light in neutral aqueous solution. 90% Cr(VI) was reduced in 3 h using sample with 1% sulphur doping (Cui et al. 2018b). Ren et al. (2017) prepared carbon quantum dots (CQDs) decorated with MoSe2 photocatalysts for photocatalytic reduction of Cr(VI). 99% reduction was reported when the amount of CQDs was 1%. The increase in the activity was attributed to enhanced optical absorption, high charge transfer and light down-converting effect from CQDs. For increasing the efficiency and the reaction time, heterostructures or composite catalysts are involved. In a related work, ZnFe2O4/CdS composites were prepared by a facile route (Fang et al. 2018). 7% ZnFe2O4/CdS can effectively reduce more than 90% Cr(VI) in 120 min, which is faster than the single catalysts. In another work, metal-free catalyst boron nitride (BN) was coupled with BiOCl flower-shaped microspheres (Xu et al. 2017). 1% BN/BiOCl exhibited highest activity which is about 2.39 times than that of pure BiOCl. However, for 2% BN/BiOCl the activity decreased because of BN occupying some of active sites of BiOCl. Many other heterojunctions and composite materials have been reported in the literature for photoreduction of Cr(VI) for better performance, and research is still going for achieving the best.

Water splitting and clean energy production

The clean energy production is essential because of the increasing depletion of fossil fuels. In this regard, hydrogen is one of the most prospective energy sources. The hydrogen is generally produced by electrocatalytic and photocatalytic water splitting as well as from other sources too. In general, precious metals such as Pt, Ir and Pd are used as co-catalysts in hydrogen production and have excellent performance. But they are scarce and expensive. Therefore, new catalysts which can either be used in combination with these precious metals or which can directly be used without co-catalyst are required. Many reported works have utilized metal oxides and mixed metal oxides for the purpose of the same but with poor efficiency. Photocatalytic generation of H2 via water splitting is the most efficient and cost-effective methodology.

For applying this process to energy storage, the temperature of 2500 K is required. To degenerate the water molecule, photochemical decomposition of water is a good alternative because photon has a shorter wavelength than 1100 nm. The photocatalytic splitting of pure water is done under visible light and ultraviolet light. Various techniques are used for the conversion of solar energy into electricity or chemical energy but photovoltaic being the most direct. For this, photoelectrochemical process is mostly used (Sfaelou and Lianos 2016). Photoactivated fuel cells also named as photocatalytic fuel cell or photofuel cells are used to oxidize a fuel which produces electricity or storable chemical energy mainly by hydrogen. Photoelectrochemical cell has a photoanode electrode which carries photocatalyst. For the water splitting purposes, perovskite-based photocatalysts are also used. In water splitting reaction, the photon of suitable wavelength, electrons and holes is produced within photocatalyst. Water molecules are absorbed on the surface of photocatalyst because of interaction of water molecule and hole in the valence band.

As the most promising way to generate hydrogen as a clean and renewable fuel, the evolution of hydrogen and oxygen using sunlight is considered (Tang et al. 2008). For the water treatment technology, heterogeneous photocatalysis is the most effective technique. It has high efficiency in the degradation of organic contaminants and disinfection of pathogenic microorganism (Chong et al. 2010). The photocatalytic water splitting of pure water under UV light is also done with the help of perovskites titanates such as SrTiO3. This shows reduced activity for the cleavage of water molecule (Domen et al. 1980). Among perovskites, lanthanum titanate La2Ti2O7 shows a photonic efficiency of 120% for water dissociation in O2 and H2 (Kim et al. 2005). Many nitrides, mixed chalcogenides and perovskites have been successfully used with and without co-catalysts for H2 production.

Hybrid photocatalysts

However, many new photocatalysts have been employed as alternative to metal oxides with better properties. But combination of various catalysts is required for faster and better results. These hybrid materials which involve combination of semiconductors with other catalysts, polymers, bio-molecules, sensitizers, organic frameworks, supports, have high photoactivity, adsorption potential and highly reduced recombination of charge carriers. These hybrid materials may contain photoactive metal oxides (Colmenares and Xu 2016; Zhao et al. 2016b), quantum dots or perovskites (Wang et al. 2015b) enhancing the photocatalytic efficiency. For the photocatalytic supports, there are various types of synthetic polymer like polythene, polypropylene, polystyrene, poly vinyl chloride and so on (Colmenares and Kuna 2017). In order to know the restrictions of photocatalytic achievements, the main photochemical and photophysical mechanism leading to that process must be known. In this regard, semiconductor heterojunction or assemblies which involve two or more semiconductors combined at nanoscale with a high interfacial contact have proved to be an effective strategy. The coupling of semiconductors is done after considering the band gaps, position of conduction band and valence band edges. This can be done to promote effective movement and separation of photogenerated electrons and holes. The p-type (like BiOCl, Cu2O, etc.) and n-type semiconductors are combined to form heterojunctions. And there is a diffusion of electrons and holes even in the absence of the light, which generated an intrinsic electric field. This field facilitates the movement of electrons among conduction bands and that of holes between the valence bands. In addition, many researchers utilize electron sinks as polymers, carbon, biochar, graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide into the catalyst for eating up unused electrons which decreases recombination.

Table 8 lists some of the hybrid photocatalysts which are not based on metal oxides and employ sulphides, nitrides, oxyhalides, halides, graphitic materials and perovskites as the candidates. It is certain that they perform better in all photocatalytic applications as compared to the single catalysts.

Table 8 Some hybrid photocatalysts for environmental applications

Conclusion

Metal oxides have ruled the advanced oxidation processes for environmental detoxification and have been star photocatalysts so far. But with changing scenario, the energy demands for increasing and more emerging pollutants of concern are increasing. In addition, the efficiency, quantum yield, reusability, toxicity and cost-effectiveness of the photocatalyst decide its role in real conditions, outside the laboratory. There have been innovations reported for improvement of activity of metal oxides. However, as discussed they also possess many limitations. As it has been stated in this review, a number of alternative photocatalysts have surpassed the performance of metal oxides for various environmental applications under different experimental constrains. These photocatalysts mainly include mainly sulphides, nitrides, halides, oxyhalides, perovskites, metal-free materials and hybrid catalysts which posses better photocatalytic activity along with the better use of the solar spectrum.

Many photocatalysts such as some nitrides and perovskites have been used for photocatalytic water splitting and CO2 conversion without the help of any precious metals as co-catalysts or support. However, this was not achieved earlier with popular metal oxides. Involving representative elements and non-metals into photocatalysis has remained a challenge; however, nitrides, phosphides, carbides, sulphides, BN, g-C3N4, etc. have scaled down the cost of photocatalysis as well as increased the bio-quotient of the catalyst because of low toxicity. The designing of an optimum photocatalyst with a simple approach for solar utilization, high quantum efficiency, reusability, separation and low toxicity has been a synthetic challenge. In addition to increasing environmental pollution and exploitation of non-renewable energy sources, the next challenge is to develop novel materials and novel green technologies with a multi-pronged approach. It has been observed that many of photocatalytic experiments performed in the laboratories for detoxification and energy production have not been able to materialize in the real world. Thus, it is necessary to develop sustainable systems which utilize the advanced oxidation processes to detoxify environment and produce clean energy in the real and practical situations.