Abstract
Heavy metal pollution is a global issue due to health risks associated with metal contamination. Although many metals are essential for life, they can be harmful to man, animal, plant and microorganisms at toxic levels. Occurrence of heavy metals in soil is mainly attributed to natural weathering of metal-rich parent material and anthropogenic activities such as industrial, mining, agricultural activities. Here we review the effect of soil microbes on the biosorption and bioavailability of heavy metals; the mechanisms of heavy metals sequestration by plant and microbes; and the effects of pollution on soil microbial diversity and activities. The major points are: anthropogenic activities constitute the major source of heavy metals in the environment. Soil chemistry is the major determinant of metal solubility, movement and availability in the soil. High levels of heavy metals in living tissues cause severe organ impairment, neurological disorders and eventual death. Elevated levels of heavy metals in soils decrease microbial population, diversity and activities. Nonetheless, certain soil microbes tolerate and use heavy metals in their systems; as such they are used for bioremediation of polluted soils. Soil microbes can be used for remediation of contaminated soils either directly or by making heavy metals bioavailable in the rhizosphere of plants. Such plants can accumulate 100 mg g−1 Cd and As; 1000 mg g−1 Co, Cu, Cr, Ni and 10,000 mg g−1 Pb, Mn and Ni; and translocate metals to harvestable parts. Microbial activity changes soil physical properties such as soil structure and biochemical properties such as pH, soil redox state, soil enzymes that influence the solubility and bioavailability of heavy metals. The concept of ecological dose (ED50) and lethal concentration (LC50) was developed in response to the need to easily quantify the influence of pollutants on microbial-mediated ecological processes in various ecosystems.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Heavy metal pollution is widespread in the environment. Heavy metals are those elements with density greater than five and constitute more than 35 % of the elements in the periodic table. Some of them like zinc (Zn), iron (Fe), copper (Cu), molybdenum (Mo), manganese (Mn) are important in plant and animal nutrition in a very low concentration. They participate in redox processes and osmoregulation and act as cofactors of enzymes (Silver and Phung 2005). The use of metals by both prokaryotic and eukaryotic microbes for structural and/or catalytic functions is a well-known phenomenon (Gadd and Griffiths 1978; Gadd 1990; Rosen 2002; Khan et al. 2009; Novarro-Noya et al. 2010; Gounou et al. 2010). A typical example of microbial utilization of heavy metals is depicted in Figs. 1 and 2. In Fig. 2, the organisms use the metals to enhance their growth and metabolism. However, beyond a certain threshold level, they are all regarded as poisonous and deleterious to plant and animal health. Some heavy metals have no essential function in the life cycle of living organisms (e.g., mercury (Hg), cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb)). They can damage cell membranes; disrupt enzymatic and cellular functions; damage the structure of DNA; modification of protein structure and replacement of essential elements (Bruins et al. 2000; Göhre and Paszkowski 2006). Heavy metals may therefore impair the life cycle of living organisms. This is attributed to their long biological half life, toxicity and non-biodegradability (Alloway 1995; Adriano 2001).
Soil microbes are integral and essential components of the ecosystem (Harris 2009). There is complex interaction between various components of the soil ecosystem including microbial biomass and soil chemical contaminants such as heavy metals and radionuclides (Kabata-Pendias 2001). Besides soil properties like pH (Fierer and Jackson 2006), soil type (Wu et al. 2008; Bach et al. 2010), salinity (Rajaniemi and Allison 2009) that significantly influence the soil microbial biomass, their activities and dynamic behaviour may be governed by the level and type of chemical contaminants such as heavy metals. However, some microorganisms like bacteria, protista and fungi can degrade heavy metal compounds and transform the end product into part of their metabolism with the aid of specialized enzymes. During the process, the heavy metal is either removed or transformed into nontoxic compound. Metal mobility and bioavailability have been shown to be reduced by soil microbes through biosorption and bioprecipitation (Zhuang et al. 2007; Pajuelo et al. 2011). These mechanisms also help in immobilization of heavy metals in the soil (Méndez and Maier 2008). Figure 3 shows a microbial transformation of Fe(III) to Fe(II) and immobilization of heavy metals. These and other mechanisms of heavy metal immobilization and sequestration by soil microbes shall be discussed in details. Human activities constitute the major source of heavy metals pollution while their solubility, movement, retention and availability are mainly controlled by the soil chemical matrices. High metal concentrations in living tissues of organisms have resulted to severe organ impairment, neurological disorders and eventual death.
Heavy metals in the environment
Sources of heavy metals pollution
Heavy metals are derived from two major sources: natural and anthropogenic. Anthropogenic contamination of the environment with heavy metals is the most widely distributed and most deleterious. This is probably as a result of their instability and solubility and hence bioavailability (Abdu et al. 2011a). Human activities such as smelting, mining, agricultural activities such as mineral fertilizer and sewage sludge application and pesticide use, industrialization, metal-containing waste disposal and military activities such as weapon testing are varieties of anthropogenic heavy metal contamination sources. Building materials like paints, cigarette smokes, metallurgy or smelting, aerosol cans and sewage discharge are all anthropogenic sources of heavy metals (Abdu 2010). Colouring of plastics during manufacturing is achieved through addition of pigments containing heavy metals. Coating of cutleries, industrial and hand tools, aeroplane parts, automobile and truck parts with heavy metals such as Cd are common anthropogenic sources of pollution (Kirkham 2006). The use of Cd as luminescent dials and rubber curing also contribute to heavy metal pollution (Adriano 2001). Wearing and tearing of automobile parts is a major exposure route of heavy metals to the environment. Cadmium can be released from automobile tires as it wears which can be transported into the sewage system through run-off (Kirkham 2006) or as particulate matter into the atmosphere.
Weathering and pedogenesis are the major natural sources of heavy metals. Mineral ores like galena, cerussite, cassiterite and arsenopyrite can undergo dissolution through chemical weathering thereby releasing heavy metals contained in their structure (Abdu 2010; Abdu et al. 2011b). Heavy metals are constituents of primary and secondary minerals through the process of inclusion, adsorption and solid solution formation termed as coprecipitation (Sposito 2008). Acid rain and dew are also natural sources of heavy metal pollution (Nriagu 1990). Atmospheric dust storms, wild forest fires and volcanic eruptions are input routes for natural heavy metal pollution (Naidu et al. 1997). The effect of pedogenic heavy metal pollution may override that of anthropogenic sources especially when the parent material contains high level of heavy metal (Brown et al. 1999).
Availability and movement of heavy metals in soil
Soil chemical component is the major determinant of heavy metal movement and availability in the soil. Hydrous oxides and hydroxides of iron, aluminium and manganese are major soil chemical components contributing to heavy metal mobility in the soil (Tack et al. 2006). The large affinity of the crystalline and amorphous form of these metal oxides and hydroxides for heavy metals influences the movement and sorption of metals in soil (Abdu 2010). The binding effect of organic matter on soil components also influences the availability of heavy metals (Naidu et al. 2003). The diverse functional groups in organic substances which often dissociate easily under alkaline condition also affect the availability of toxic heavy metals in the soil. Formation of metal–organic compounds in the soil is achieved through the interaction of humic substances with sesquioxides such as oxides of Fe, Al and Mn. Heavy metals occluded in the oxides of these metals are often referred to as relatively active fractions (Shuman 1985). Agbenin (2002), however, observed inhibitory effect of soil organic matter on crystallization of heavy metal occluded in Mn and Fe oxides in soils of the Nigerian savanna.
The chemistry of the aqueous soil phase exerts a profound influence on metal mobility. Acidic conditions tend to increase the mobility of heavy metals as a result of proton competition and decreased negative binding sites (Horckmans et al. 2007). Conversely, at elevated soil pH heavy metals such as Pb may be precipitated as insoluble hydroxides. However, the functional groups present in organic matter may dissociate under alkaline conditions thereby increasing bioavailability of organic matter-bound heavy metals (Fine et al. 2005). Competition for metal cations by organic complexing ligands and soil colloidal surface especially at elevated pH also increases heavy metal mobility and bioavailability in soil (Abdu 2010). This might be attributed to the pH-dependent dissolution/precipitation and redox reactions of the hydrated metal oxides in the soil (Tack et al. 2006). Soil pH is often the most important soil chemical properties influencing heavy metal mobility in the soil. It exerts a strong influence on metal solubility, adsorption and desorption processes and on metal speciation in the soil–solution interface. Christensen (1984) observed a twofold increase in heavy metal concentrations in soil solution due to a unit increase in soil solution pH. Bioavailability is a term used to describe the release of a chemical from a medium of concern to living receptors such as plant roots (Adriano 2001) and microbes. In relation to heavy metals, it is defined as the fraction of a metal in the soil that is accessible to the food chain, plants (Misra et al. 2009) and other components of the soil microbial biomass. Mycorrhizal fungi under symbiosis can increase the adsorptive surface area of plant roots thereby influencing heavy metal uptake (Alloway 1995). Wang et al. (2009) reported modification of heavy metal movement and fixation as a result of root excretion of organic acids that form complexes and chelates with metal ions. The effects of root exudate on soil microbial population and diversity and on the chemistry of the rhizosphere may also alter the mobility and retention of heavy metals (Giller et al.1998).
Dehydration and re-crystallization of precipitates of hydrous metal oxides with time known as metal ageing often reduce the mobility of the metal associated with these oxides. The same process was observed by Lock and Janssen (2003) to reduce heavy metal bioavailability in soil with time.
Effect of heavy metals on the ecosystem
The persistence and long biological half life of heavy metals coupled with their ubiquitous nature in the environment make them a nuisance to the ecosystem. The fate of metal contaminant in an ecosystem depends on chemical properties of the metal, abiotic factors within the ecosystem and interaction with the biotic environment. These can result into either degradation, transformation into another phase or bioaccumulation (Timothy et al. 1999), which will then be hazardous. The major effect of heavy metal on the ecosystem is biomagnifications in the tissue of living organisms. The effect of heavy metal pollution on an ecosystem starts with active or passive uptake of heavy metals by primary producers (phytoplankton). Primary consumers feed directly on the phytoplankton while secondary consumers feed on either or both the primary producers and primary consumers. As we advance up the trophic level, higher consumers and top predators will eventually be affected. Different toxic effects of heavy metals to different components of the ecosystem have been reported. Toxic effects of lead on organisms include reduced growth and reproduction, impairment of blood chemistry by inhibiting heme formation (Eisler 1988), lesions and behavioural changes (Timothy et al. 1999). Reduction in muscle condition with eventual alteration in feeding activities was observed in hawks under elevated lead exposure (Osborn et al. 1983). The most severe effect of lead poisoning is death. Recently, in northern Nigeria a case of over 800 deaths of people mostly children has been reported as a result of lead poisoning through mining activities. Heavy metals accumulate in mammals, especially in the kidney, liver and reproductive organs. Effect of cadmium in humans includes renal dysfunction (Kirkham 2006), pulmonary emphysema and the notorious Itai–Itai (‘ouch–ouch’) disease (Yeung and Hsu 2005) which results in painful bone demineralization (osteoporosis) (Kirkham 2006) and resulted to the death of hundreds of people in Japan. Heavy metal pollution has been reported to significantly reduce human life expectancy in Romania (Lăcătuşu et al. 1996). In Turkey, high occurrence of upper gastrointestinal cancer has been correlated with heavy metal pollution (Türkdoğan et al. 2003). Jarup (2003) reported Cd and Pb to be associated with the aetiology of a number of cardiovascular, kidney, blood, nervous system and bone diseases in man.
Elevated concentrations of heavy metals in soils have been shown to decrease soil microbial biomass, diversity and activities. However, certain soil microorganisms are used for remediation of heavy metal-polluted environments. This is as a result of certain physiological mechanisms they exhibit which enable them to tolerate and utilize heavy metals in their systems. They also aid in making heavy metals bioavailable in the rhizosphere of plants that are used in phytoremediation.
Heavy metals and soil microbial biomass
Toxicity of heavy metals to soil microbes
The soil microbial biomass population is under tremendous pressure due to contamination by a variety of toxic substances such as pesticides, heavy metals and organic pollutants such as sewage sludge and waste water of environmental origin (McGrath et al. 1988; Chaudhary and McGrath 1996). A review about toxicity of heavy metals to microorganisms and microbial processes in agricultural soils has been given by Giller et al. (1998).
Soil microbes utilize some heavy metals as electron donors or acceptors during the process of metabolism. In such case, high amount of the metal is employed by the microbes without manifestation of toxicity. Such metals are usually those with variable oxidation states like chromium, vanadium, arsenic, selenium, copper, iron and manganese. Despite the utilization of heavy metals by soil microbes, microorganisms have been the most sensitive of all living soil organisms to heavy metal stress (Giller et al. 1998). High level of metal pollution has been reported to inhibit the activity of soil microorganisms through accumulation of organic matter at the surface soil layer (Strojan 1978; Freedman and Hutchinson 1980). Adverse effects of heavy metals on soil microbial activities have been reported as early as the 1910s, but severe consequence of metal pollution on microbial diversity, processes and the ecosystem became more glaring in the 1960s–1970s (Giller et al. 1998). The first documented report of heavy metal toxicity on soil microbial activities was the work of Lipman and Burgess (1914).
Mechanism of the toxicity of heavy metals to soil microbes
Microorganisms in less heavy metal-polluted soils were found to utilize higher amount of carbon for assimilation with smaller amount released as CO2 in the dissimilation process, than in polluted soils. The synthesis of microbial biomass in heavy metal-polluted soils was found to be less effective than in non-polluted soils due to the stress caused by heavy metals (Smejkalova et al. 2003). In polluted environments, microorganisms require more energy to survive due to unfavourable conditions. Therefore, a higher portion of consumed carbon by the microorganisms is released as CO2 and a smaller part built into organic components (Smejkalova et al. 2003). The pollution causes more pressure on sensitive microbes and thus changes the diversity of soil microflora representative groups of microorganisms (Zaguralskaya 1997).
There have been reviews on the effect of heavy metals on microorganisms such as that of Trevors et al. (1986) that have dealt with mainly in vitro studies of biochemical and physiological mechanisms. Some others studied the effects of metals on microorganisms (Giller et al. 1998, 2009; Abdousalam 2010). Heavy metals influence the microbial population by adversely affecting their growth, morphology, biochemical activities and ultimately resulting in decreased biomass and diversity (Roane and Pepper 1989). They can damage the cell membrane, alter enzymes specificity, disrupt cellular functions and damage the structure of the DNA (Rathnayake et al. 2010). Toxicity of heavy metals could occur through the displacement of essential metals from their native binding sites or through ligand interactions (Bruins et al. 2000). It could also occur as a result of alterations in the conformational structure with oxidative phosphorylation and osmotic balance (Bruins et al. 2000). A summary of heavy metals toxicity to plants and soil microorganisms is represented in Figs. 4 and 5.
Effects of heavy metals on microbial diversity
Ecotoxicological studies have shown a decreased microbial population and alteration of the microbial diversity and structure as a result of heavy metal toxicity (Brookes and McGrath 1984; Frostegard et al. 1993; Leita et al. 1995; Witter and Dahlin 1995; Kandeler et al. 1996; Knight et al. 1997; Chaudri et al. 1993, 2000; Megharaj et al. 2003; Barajas-Aceves 2005; Linton et al. 2007; Giller et al. 2009).
Significant inhibition of carbon (C)–biomass occurred in soils highly contaminated by heavy metals (Smejkalova et al. 2003) which corroborated data obtained by Brookes and McGrath (1984) who observed only half content of biomass in soil-contaminated heavy metals compared to uncontaminated soils. Dias et al. (1998) even observed higher than 80 % inhibition of C–biomass by heavy metals, just as Abdousalam (2010) observed microbial biomass C to sharply decrease with Cd and Ti, whereas the addition of Pb did not have any significant inhibitory effect on the level of microbial biomass C. Similar significant negative effects on microbial biomass and its metabolic activities have been described in many other studies such as that of Brookes (1995). Thus, it has become clear and obvious that metal-contaminated soil can have its microbial diversity and population adversely affected.
The observed effects of heavy metals on microbial biomass were related to the total concentration of heavy metals or to the water-soluble concentration (Hund-Rinke and Kordel 2003). However, because bacteria are present within colonies in the soil (Harris 1994), they often may not be exposed to the equilibrium solution, activity of heavy metals (Hund-Rinke and Kordel 2003). Water-soluble heavy metals are thought to be more available to organisms and thus may be considered to be better indicator for microbial biomass dynamics (Anand et al. 2003).
Contamination of soil with high rates of Cd was observed to cause a significant decrease in the number of oligotrophic bacteria, oligotrophic sporulating bacteria and copiotrophic and copiotrophic sporulating bacteria in the soil (Wyszkowska and Wyszkowski 2002). In a study by Ahmad et al. (2005) pollution of the soil with salts of Cu, Cd, Cr, Hg, Mn, Ni, Pb and Zn under laboratory conditions showed sensitivity of aerobic heterotrophic bacteria to metal groups like Ni and Cd, followed by Cu, Cd, Hg, Mn, Cr and Zn. These authors also reported symbiotic nitrogen fixers showing higher sensitivity to metal groups like Cd, Pb, Hg followed by Cu, Cr, Mn and Zn. Actinomycetes were found to be most sensitive. They observed that metal toxicity to be concentration and time dependent (Ahmad et al. 2005).
Copper toxicity was observed to decrease the number and diversity of Collembola (Filser et al. 1995), it was also reported to decrease microbial biomass (Baath 1989), and it inhibits the activities of cyanobacteria (Pipe 1992). It was also reported by Fritze et al. (1996) to have decreased soil respiration activity. Arsenic was observed to decrease plant root activity while lead decreased microbial activity (Turpeinen 2002). Similarly, Rasmussen and Sorensen (2001) reported a decreased microbial diversity as a result of mercury toxicity. Cadmium, Zn, Cu, Pb, Cr and Ni were all reported to decrease bacteria population, inhibited phosphatase, urease and dehydrogenase activities in a metal-polluted soil (Gao et al. 2010).
Adaptation to and utilization of heavy metals by microbes
Microbes utilize heavy metals and exhibit different tolerance in their utilization in the soil. Soil microbial biomass plays indirect roles in phytoremediation of heavy metals by indirectly acting in the plants rhizosphere and influence chelated or complexed metals into soluble forms that are readily available for plant uptake. Naees et al. (2011) found a certain bacteria (Burkholderia spp.) to increase the bioavailability of Pb and Cd and increase their uptake by maize and tomato plants.
Soil microbes have devised several mechanisms to combat and mitigate the effect of heavy metal toxicity on their survival. Microbes are equipped with genes that enable them accumulate heavy metals beyond a certain limit and also possess the ability to modify or transform heavy metals into less toxic forms. Such microbes can survive and reproduce in a heavy metal-contaminated environment. Scientists have taken advantages of these specialized genes in organism in the field of bioremediation. Soil fauna and flora have used the following strategies or mechanisms to adapt and survive heavy metal-polluted environments:
Tolerance
This refers to the ability of microorganisms to survive and thrive under conditions of heavy metal stress while still maintaining normal physiological, reproductive and biochemical functions. Tolerance of soil biota towards heavy metals involves different mechanisms and involves binding of the metal by the cell wall or proteins; formation of insoluble metal complexes, volatilization and removal from the soil. This tolerance depends on the sensitivity of microorganisms to certain heavy metals in the soil. It also depends on the level of organization of the soil biota and goes by the order of soil macrofauna being more sensitive than microfauna which are in turn more sensitive to the microflora (Fig. 6). Kandeler et al. (2000) found a sensitivity of microbial enzyme functions and increasing metal levels. While several studies show the negative effects of heavy metals on soil microbial biomass and enzyme activities, elevated levels of Pb in monocultures had no effect on biomass C, urease and acid phosphatase activities (Yang et al. 2007). The same study suggests that the coexistence of plant species under elevated levels of Pb increases the functional diversity of soil microbes and increases urease activity and hence decreases the negative effect of Pb to soil biota (Yang et al. 2007). Vig et al. (2003) emphasized that the effect of Cd bioavailability and toxicity on biota varies with time, soil type, speciation, ageing, Cd source, organisms and the environmental factors.
Tolerance and uptake capacities have been identified as essential characteristics of organisms that enable their use in bioremediation (Macaskie and Dean 1989). Several studies have reported tolerance of micro- and macroorganisms to heavy metal toxicity (see, for example, Gadd and Griffiths 1978; Rehman and Anjum 2010). Tolerance of organisms especially plants to excessive concentration of heavy metals may be through the prevention of uptake into the root (by complexation with root exudates) or limited translocation from the root to the shoot, an adaptive mechanism referred to as exclusion, and it may be through the process of detoxification which is an internal tolerance mechanism and occurs either by vacuolar compartmentation of the metal or binding (Tarradelas et al. 2005; Rama Rao et al. 1997). This mechanism prevents internal cellular injury and is mainly through the production of varieties of metal chelating organic compounds (Tarradelas et al. 2005) and binding of heavy metals to rhizodermal cell walls, thus avoiding heavy metal uptake (Göhre and Paszkowski 2006). It could also be by biochemical tolerance like enzymatic adaptations (Baker and Walker 1990). A typical heavy metal sequestration mechanism in the rhizosphere is shown in Fig. 7. Other mechanisms are regulation of metal uptake and transformation into less toxic forms (Rama Rao et al. 1997; Gharieb and Gadd 1998).
The relationship of microorganisms to heavy metal pollution is complex and contradictory in case of sewages sludge application to the land (Smith 1991), some positive and negative interactions between metals upon their toxic effects on microorganisms have been reported by Abdousalam (2010), and there is enormous disparity as to which heavy metal concentrations are toxic (Baath 1989). Microorganisms interact with metals in many ways, and several metals are essential to microorganisms because they are electron acceptors or cofactors in enzymes, whereas other metals are toxic (Collins and Stotzky 1992). Muhlbachova and Simon (2003) showed the activity of the microbial pool to differ among contaminated soils and that in long-term contaminated soils it may not be necessarily lower even in the presence of toxic elements (Muhulbachova and Tlustos 2006). Artificial contamination of soils of known physicochemical characteristics with metal salts and enumeration of the surviving indigenous populations, in a short-term study, revealed the occurrence of microbes in a particular soil sample with intrinsic ability to tolerate metals (Ahmad et al. 2005). An earlier observation also revealed that heavy metal tolerance by a particular group of bacteria or an individual isolated in artificial media supplemented with heavy metals was high (Ahmad et al. 2001; Hayat et al. 2002).
The tolerance of certain soil bacteria to heavy metals has been proposed as an indicator of the potential toxicity of heavy metals to other forms of biota in soils (Olsen and Thornton 1982; Hassen et al. 1998). The bacteria E. coli is known to bind heavy metals like Cd and Cu through metal-binding peptides and membrane-associated proteins like LamB (Gadd 2000). Two gram-positive isolates of bacteria; Paenibacillus sp. and Bacillus thuringiensis were identified as tolerant (Rathnayake et al. 2010). When the metal tolerance of both was compared,Paenibacillus sp. showed the highest sensitivity to Cu, whereas Bacillus thuringiensis showed the highest sensitivity to Cd and Zn. These findings reveal the potential of Paenibacillus sp. in developing biosensor to detect Cu in environmental samples (Rathnayake et al. 2010). This also involves several genes encoding metal uptake transporter and trafficking proteins like Nramp3, RAN1 and AtHMA3 (Thomine et al. 2000; Hirayama et al. 1999; Gravot et al. 2004). Bioavailability of Cd, Pb and associated toxicity to soil biota, however, varied with time, soil type, speciation, ageing, Cd and Pb sources, organisms and environmental factors (Abdousalam 2010).
Redox transformations of heavy metals in the soil environment have been shown to aid microbial mobilization of toxic metals (Oremland et al. 1991; Gadd 1993; Phillips et al. 1995; Chang et al. 1999; Gharieb et al. 1999; Smith and Gadd 2000; Hobman et al. 2000; Lovley 2000; Gadd 2004). This is very clear as most redox reactions occurring in the soil environment require anaerobic bacteria as source of electron. This can, however, cause high metal availability through soil acidification especially when iron-oxidizing bacteria reduce iron pyrites to ferrous sulphate (FeSO4) and sulphuric acid (H2SO4) (Giller et al. 1998). Moreover, some microbes use heavy metals through redox reaction as source of energy and growth and play a vital role in biogeochemical cycling of the metal ions (Spain and Alm 2003), for example, biomethylation of mercury (Hg(II)) to very toxic gaseous methyl mercury, and of lead to dimethyl lead by some certain bacteria species (Pongratz and Heumann 1999). It is still not very clear as whether microbial transformation of heavy metals through redox reaction is mainly for detoxification or for the benefit of the microbes during growth (Spain and Alm 2003). The possibility of a symbiotic relationship between soil microbes and polluted environments has been clearly demonstrated. Anaerobic sediments were found to accumulate arsenite in a microbe-mediated arsenic reduction by Brannon and Patrick (1987). Similar observation was made by Harrington et al. (1998) who reported microbial reduction of arsenate to arsenite. Certain sulphate-reducing bacteria have been demonstrated to contribute in the oxidation and reduction of certain toxic heavy metals and thus play a vital role in the cycling of such metals (Harrington et al. 1998). In general, microbial activities can either increase metal bioavailability and potential toxicity by solubilizing them, or reduce their bioavailability by immobilize them (Spain and Alm 2003).
Bioremediation
Bioremediation involves the use of microorganisms, green plants and vegetations in ameliorating or detoxifying the pollution that results from heavy metals. Microorganisms that have the capability of growing in heavy metal-polluted environment and also have a significant metal uptake are used in bioremediation (Shakoori et al. 2004). Microbial biomass of bacteria, fungi and yeast has been used severally in bioremediation (Shakoori and Qureshi 2000; Feng and Aldrich 2004; Rehman et al. 2007; Morales-Barrera and Cristiani-Urbina 2008). The use of microbes in remediation is through the process of reducing and immobilizing toxic metals (Francis and Dodge 1998). It has been shown that microbes in the family Geobacteraceae have been used in remediation of contaminated aquifer sediments with uranium through reduction (Holmes et al. 2002) and also in technetium reduction (Lloyd et al. 2000).
Hyperaccumulator plants that accumulate heavy metal beyond recommended level into their tissue without showing physiological symptoms (Baker and Brooks 1989; Baker et al. 1991; Entry et al. 1999) are also used in phytoremediation. For a plant to qualify as a hyperaccumulator, it must be able to accumulate more than 2 % of heavy metals (100 mg g−1 Cd and As; 0.01 % dry wt.), (1000 mg g−1 Co, Cu, Cr, Ni; 0.1 % dry wt.) and (10,000 mg g−1 Pb, Mn and Ni; 1 % dry wt.) and translocate them to the harvestable part (Reeves and Baker 2000; Watanabe 1997). In addition to these, the plant must have significant amount of root surface area (Prasad and Freitas 2003) and shoot biomass. It must be easy to handle with low maintenance cost (Prasad and Freitas 2003) and easily disposable without further contamination of the environment. Besides hyperaccumulating heavy metals in their tissues, they also survive the toxicity by total avoidance of the metal (Khan et al. 2009).
Salt et al. (1998) described six phytoremediation processes, viz. asses of phytoremediation, viz. phytostabilization, phytoextraction, rhizofiltration, phytovolatilization, phytodegradation and plant removal of pollutants from the air. Several plant species that accumulate and tolerate heavy metals otherwise known as hyperaccumulators have been used in the detoxification of metal-polluted soils. About 400 species of plants including fungi, weeds, and food crops to ornamentals have been identified to hyperaccumulate heavy metals (Prasad and Freitas 2003). Such plants may be native of metalliferous soils or not. Table 1 lists the common hyperaccumulator plants with the potential heavy metal tolerance as reported in the literature. Heavy metal hyperaccumulator plants are dominated by Asteraceae, Brassicaceae, Caryophyllaceae, Cyperaceae, Cunoniaceae, Fabaceae, Flacourtiaceae, Lamiaceae, Poaceae, Violaceae, and Euphorbiaceae families (Prasad and Freitas 2003). Though most of them are specific to contaminants, some still have the capability to hyperaccumulate more than one heavy metal (Table 1).
Water hyacinth grown in wastewater and soil of landfills may contain some microbes which may play some roles in phytoremediation of metals and nitrogen (Mehmood et al. 2009). Aspergillus niger, Azotobacter, Thiobacillus thiooxidans (A. ferrooxidans) play a vital role in bioremediation of metals and nitrogen compounds (Simmonds 1979; Pelczar Jr. et al. 1986; Frattini et al. 2000; Allegretti et al. 2006 and Pathak et al. 2009). The technique of phytoremediation is cheap and environmentally friendly; however, the problem still lies on how to dispose the plants after harvesting without further contamination of another environmental component. Incinerating the harvested biomass will definitely release the metal content into the atmosphere similar to incorporating them deep into the soil through leaching and eventual contamination of groundwater. The proposed disposal options of Salt et al. (1995) which include composting, air drying, ashing and compressing in a landfill could still be a source of contaminating the ecosystem.
Another major drawback of phytoremediation is low heavy metal removal rate by plants (McGrath et al. 2002; Rattan et al. 2002). Most hyperaccumulator plants are shallow rooted (Khan et al. 2009) and can therefore extract metal to a certain shallow soil depth.
Soil microbial population exists in different hierarchical order and performs different biochemical roles according to their organizational level and structure. Soil microbes used for bioremediation of heavy metal-polluted soils are mainly in the micro and mesolevels.
Components of microbial population
Components of soil microbial biomass
Soil biota makes up the biotic component of the soil systems and exists as living organisms that are either visible or so tiny to the human vision. They are made up from different levels of organization from cellular, tissue and systematic levels. Soil organisms play diverse roles in soil physical and biochemical processes. The activities of each group of organism depend on their sizes as well as their functional diversity within the soil habitat which led to their classification into functional groups. They are classified into functional group that includes ecosystem engineers, litter transformers, predators, decomposers, microregulators, soil borne pest and diseases and prokaryotic transformers (Swift et al. 2008). Soil organisms in these functional groups fall under major target groups of macrofauna, mesofauna and soil microbial biomass (microflora and microfauna). Characterization of the soil biota into target groups allows further discussion on the diversity and roles they play in the soil system.
Macrofauna
Macrofauna comprises mainly of soil animals that are 1 cm long and have a diameter greater than 2 mm. Macrofauna are the most conspicuous of the three target groups and are soil animals often referred to as the ‘soil ecosystem engineers’ (Lavelle et al. 1999) and play a significant role in soil structural formation. Their tunnelling and burrowing activities in mechanical mixing and bioturbation stabilize soil aggregates which in turn influences air and water movement (Swift et al. 2008; Ayuke 2010), and in the transformation and distribution of organic materials. Many macrofauna acts as litter decomposers and soil predators in their functional diversity. Examples of soil macrofauna are earthworm, termites, ants, beetles, millipedes, centipedes and large arachnids.
Mesofauna
Soil mesofauna are composed of animals whose sizes range 0.2–2 mm who function as predators and litter decomposers. They ingest organic matter and other soil microbes such as bacteria and fungi. This in turn influences the overall soil ecosystem performance by altering the population of microbes who mediate in the decomposition of organic matter (Emmerling et al. 2002). Examples of soil mesofauna include collembolan, enchytraeidae, acari (mites), protura, pauropoda, some nematodes and larval forms of macrofauna. There are evidences that suggest the significant role of mesofauna such as Collembola and enchytraeids in soil aggregate stability, water and air movements in compacted soils, and in the development of finely structured soils (Emmerling et al. 2002).
Microorganisms
Soil organisms can be grouped as microfauna and microflora whose sizes are less than 0.2 mm and are actively involved in different microbial processes in the soil. Soil fertility in natural agroecosystem depends on the microbial processes such as mineralization of organic nitrogen (N), carbon (C), sulphur (S) and phosphorus (P), transformation of soil organic matter and N2 fixation, all of which are executed by soil microbial biomass (Brookes 1995). In decomposition of organic soil materials, alternate assimilation and release of N and C by soil microbes are involved (Mary et al. 1996), and the rate is often driven by the nature of the plant material and their corresponding C:N ratios. Cyanobacteria or blue-green algae resemble higher plants in their intracellular structure and have a significant importance to agricultural soils due to their ability to fix N. In recent years, the use of algae in bioremediation of wastewater in eutrophication studies is rapidly gaining grounds (Vig et al. 2003). Certain bacteria and fungi, pseudomonas, achromobacter, flavobacterium, streptomyces, aspergillus and arthrobacter form the free living organisms that thrive in the rhizosphere. They are known to solubilize phosphate and heavy metals and make it bioavailable (Dommergues et al. 1980; Naees et al. 2011). Metal detoxification mechanism by soil macro- and microorganism is represented in Fig. 8.
Microbial activities affect the soil’s physicochemical and biological properties such as soil structure, pH, soil redox state, soil enzymes that influence the solubility and bioavailability of heavy metals in the soil.
Soil microbial parameters
Microbial parameters have been used as useful indicators to heavy metal contamination in soils (Kizilkaya et al. 2004). These parameters can be either microbial activities such as carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) mineralization, respiration, biological N fixation, measurable soil enzymes or the measure of the size of soil microbes at different functional levels or the total population as a whole (Brookes 1995). Different contamination studies make use of various combinations of microbial parameters as indicators of heavy metal pollution (Table 2). Giller et al. (1989) observed a decrease in effective symbiotic N fixation in clover plants in heavy metal-contaminated soils while Brookes et al. (1986) observed a decrease in N fixation and growth of blue-green algae in the presence of heavy metals. Several studies indicate a decrease in microbial population in heavy metal-polluted soils (Brookes and McGrath 1984; Giller et al. 1989; Chander and Brookes 1991) while others focus on the decrease in the activities of soil enzymes due to the presence of heavy metals in excess of a critical EU level (CEC: Commission of European communities 1986). According to Brookes (1995), combining microbial activities and measurements of microbial population rather than a single parameter provides a more useful indication of heavy metal presence in soil pollution studies. From their study, Kandeler et al. (1996) observed a decrease in microbial biomass and enzyme activities with increasing concentrations of heavy metals. The authors also discovered that enzymes associated with N, P and S cycling are more sensitive and having decreased activities in the presence of heavy metals. Decreased microbial biomass and activities were observed with increasing metal stress in the studies of Kuperman and Carreiro (1997), Yao et al. (2003) and Wang et al. (2007). Castaldi et al. (2004) and Kizilkaya et al. (2004) also observed a decrease in microbial population, respiration, reduced enzyme activities in soils polluted with heavy metals. All these studies show that soil microbial parameters can be useful bioindicators of heavy metal pollution in the soil although the mechanisms of how microbial response to heavy metals still remains an area of major challenge (Giller et al. 2009), in addition to the dynamics in microbial population, diversity of species and criteria used for toxicity assay (Vig et al. 2003). Soil microbial biomass that influences microbial processes in the soil includes and is not limited to respiration, C and N mineralization, soil enzymes, and microbial diversity/soil microbial biomass.
Microbial indices and soil physical and biochemical properties
Soil microbial biomass has been identified as a major soil component regulating nutrient transformation and storage (Fritze et al. 1996). Different microbial parameters were found to be good indicators of soil contamination by heavy metals (Smejkalova et al. 2003). Specific groups (spore forming, oligotrophic) microorganisms are better used as indicators of heavy metals contamination instead of total counts of bacteria, and other characteristics react to increasing concentrations of heavy metals are C-biomass and Cbiomass : Cox (Smejkalova et al. 2003). Colony-forming units (CFU) of total bacteria and micromycetes decreased with increasing heavy metals concentrations, but the decrease in CFU was most significant in the case of oligotrophic and spore forming bacteria (Smejkalova et al. 2003). Two of the most common categories of bioindicators are microbial biomass and microbial activity (Cameron et al. 1998). Microbial biomass can be a sensitive indicator of longer-term declines in total soil organic matter that results from agricultural intensification and land disturbance (Sparling 1992; Weigand et al. 1995). Heavy metal contamination of soils can have marked and persistent effects on microbial biomass (Brookes and McGrath 1984). Measures of biological activity rely on quantifying substrate use (Bardgett et al. 1994) or mineralization (Groot and Houba 1995). The biological activity in soils is usually evaluated by measuring CO2 evolution, and results obtained from different studies on the influences of heavy metals on CO2 evolution in contaminated soils by addition of sewage sludge have been at variance (Abdousalam 2010). Soil respiration and microbial biomass can be useful indicators of soil contamination, combining the two measurements to give amounts of CO2 evaluated per unit of biomass (µg CO2–C/g soil) (Abdousalam 2010).
Enzymatic activities can sensitively reflect the biological situation in the soil, and several reasons establishing enzymatic analyses to be good indicators of soil quality have been enumerated by Dick et al. (1996) and Smejkalova et al. (2003); (i) they are strongly connected with important soil characteristics such as organic matter, physical properties, microbial activity or biomass; (ii) they occur earlier than other characteristics; (iii) they involve relatively simple methods compared to other important parameters of soil quality. There have been considerable interests in studying enzyme activity in soils (Burns 1978) because such activities may reflect the potential capacity of a soil to perform certain biological transformations of importance to soil fertility (Subhani et al. 2001). A number of studies have measured the activities of enzymes in relation to heavy metals in soils such as Baath (1989), Schuller (1989), Bardgett et al. (1994) and Gao et al. (2010). Generally, enzyme activities in soils have been shown to decrease drastically in response to increasing heavy metal pollution (Subhani et al. 2001; Gao et al. 2010). Heavy metals inhibit enzymatic activities in 3 ways: (1) through complexation of the substrate, (2) by combining with the protein-active groups of the enzymes or (3) by reacting with the enzyme–substrate complex (Dick 1997; Moreno et al. 2003). However, the addition of low metal sludge increased the activities of dehydrogenase, phosphatase and beta-Glucosidase (Chander and Brookes 1991). This was attributed to an enhanced microbial activity in the soils, stimulated by the addition of nutrients in the sludge with the heavy metals below toxic level. Significant inhibition of enzymatic activities by a high level of soil contamination has been observed; heavy metals mainly inhibit enzymatic reactions through either complexing with substrate or blocking the fundamental groups of enzymes or reacting with complex enzyme–substrate (Smejkalova et al. 2003).
One general criterion used to determine microbial activity and biomass in soil is dehydrogenase activity, an indicator potential non-specific intracellular enzyme activity of the total microbial biomass (Subhani et al. 2001). It serves as an indicator of the microbiological redox systems and may be considered as a good measure of microbial oxidative activities in soils. It has been used as an indicator for active microbial biomass and is adversely affected by the presence of heavy metals (Subhani et al. 2001).
Microbial activities affect the soil’s physical properties such as soil structure and biochemical properties such as pH, soil redox state, soil enzymes that influence the solubility and bioavailability of heavy metals (Dommergues et al. 1980; Kara et al. 2008).
Toxic limits of heavy metal to soil microorganisms
Soil quality upper control limits for heavy metals need to be based on their effects on soil microorganisms or important soil microbial processes (Abdousalam 2010). The importance of this is supported by observation by Brookes (1995) that significant effects of heavy metals on both microbial biomass and activity occur at concentrations around or below current soil metal limits based on their effects on plants and animals. Unfortunately, results from research into the effects of metals soil microorganisms tend to be contradictory and there are yet no general agreement and scientifically defensible critical limits to soil metal-based microbial effects (Abdousalam 2010), and are unlikely to be for some time. One of the problems to be encountered in defining metal limits is the need to assess soil metal bioavailability rather than total soil metal concentrations (Naidu et al. 2006). It has been suggested that determination of free metal ions in soil solution may put many presently contradictory studies on the effect of metals on soil microbial activity into a unified framework for interpretation, and the issue clearly needs resolving if we are to develop a reliable, meaningful measurement of soil metal contamination for use in a dynamic assessment scheme (Cameron et al. 1998). The concept of ecological dose (ED50) and/or lethal concentration (LC50) was developed in response to the apparent need to easily quantify the influence of pollutants on microbial-mediated ecological processes in various ecosystems. It has been used by several authors to quantify the effect of heavy metals on enzymatic activities in the soil (Moreno et al. 1999, 2001; Renella et al. 2003; Yang et al. 2006; Ribeiro and Umbuzeiro 2014; Hoppe et al. 2015). ED50 and LC50 have been defined as the concentration that inhibits a microbe-mediated ecological process by 50 % (Babich et al. 1983; Gao et al. 2010).
Conclusion
Microbial activities play a vital role in soil productivity and sustainability as it underpins a number of fundamental soil properties (Subhani et al. 2001). The turnover and mineralization of organic substances, nutrient transformations and cycling of organic wastes in soils are all dependent on the metabolic functions of soil microorganisms. Therefore, the role of microbial activity in the development and functioning of soil ecosystem is inevitable and changes in soil microbial activity may be an indicator of extremely sensitive changes in the soil health (Pankhurst et al. 1995). Contamination of soils with heavy metals can adversely affect the size of the soil microbial biomass and various measures of soil microbial activity such as nitrogen mineralization and nitrogen fixation (Brookes and McGrath 1984), thus adversely affecting the ecosystem.
There is yet to be a general agreement and scientifically defensible critical limits to soil metal-based microbial effects. The concept of ecological dose (ED50) was developed into overcome the apparent need to easily quantify the influence of organic and inorganic pollutants on microbial-mediated ecological processes in various ecosystems. Data presented in this review provide a foundation for future studies on the exploitation of soil microbes in the bioremediation of contaminated environments.
References
Abdousalam A (2010) Effect of heavy metals on soil microbial processes and population. Egypt Acad J Biol Sci 2:9–14
Abdu N (2010) Availability, transfer and balances of heavy metals in urban agriculture of West Africa. Kassel University Press GmbH, Kassel, Germany. 140pp. ISBN 978-3-89958-957-3
Abdu N, Abdulkadir A, Agbenin JO, Buerkert A (2011a) Vertical distribution of heavy metals in wastewater-irrigated vegetable garden soils of three West African cities. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 89:387–397. doi:10.1007/s10705-10-9403-3
Abdu N, Agbenin JO, Buerkert A (2011b) Geochemical assessment, distribution and dynamics of trace metals in urban agricultural soils under long-term wastewater irrigation in Kano, northern Nigeria. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 173(3):447–458. doi:10.1002/jpln.201000333
Adriano DC (2001) Trace elements in terrestrial environments. Biogeochemistry, bioavailability, and risks of metals. Springer, New York
Agbenin JO (2002) Lead in a Nigerian savanna soil under long-term cultivation. Sci Total Environ 286:1–14. doi:10.1016/S0048-9697(01)00917-2
Ahmad I, Ahmad S, Inam A, Samullah A (2001) Metal and antibiotic resistance traits in Bradyrhizobium sp. (cajanus) isolated from soils receiving oil refinery waste water. World J Micro Biol Biotechnol 17:379–384. doi:10.1023/A:1016762613272
Ahmad I, Hayatu S, Ahmad S, Inam A, Samullah A (2005) Effect of heavy metals on survival of certain groups of indigenous soil microbial population. J Appl Sci Environ Manag 9:115–121
Ahmad E, Zaidi A, Khan MS, Oves M (2012) Heavy metal toxicity to symbiotic nitrogen-fixing microorganism and host legumes. In: Zaidi A et al (eds) Toxicity of heavy metals to legumes and bioremediation. Springer, Wien. doi:10.1007/978-3-7091-0730-0_2
Allegretti P, Furlong J, Donati E (2006) The role of higher polythionates in the reduction of chromium (VI) by Acidithiobacillus and Thiobacillus cultures. J Biotechnol 122:55–61. doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2005.08.031
Alloway BJ (1995) Heavy metals in soils. Wiley, New York
Anand M, Ma K, Okonski A, Lenin S, McGrath SP (2003) Characterizing biocomplexity and soil microbial dynamics along a smelter-damage landscape gradient. Sci Total Environ 311:247–259. doi:10.1016/S0048-9697(03)00058-5
Ayuke FO (2010) Soil macrofauna functional groups and their effects on soil structure, as related to agricultural management practices across agroecological zones of sub-Saharan Africa. PhD thesis, Wageningen University, The Netherlands, pp 41–64
Baath E (1989) Effect of heavy metals in soil on microbial processes and populations: a review. Water Air Soil Pollut 47:335–379. doi:10.1007/BF00279331
Babich H, Bewley RJF, Stotzky G (1983) Application of the ecological dose concept to the impact of heavy metals on some microbe-mediated ecological processes. Arch Environ Toxicol 12:421–426. doi:10.1007/BF01057585
Bach EM, Baer SG, Meyer CK, Six J (2010) Soil texture affects soil microbial and structural recovery during grassland restoration. Soil Biol Biochem 42:2182–2191. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.08.014
Baker AJM, Brooks RR (1989) Terrestrial higher plants which hyperaccumulate metallic elements—a review of their distribution, ecology and phytochemistry. Biorecovery 1:81–126
Baker AJM, Walker PL (1990) Ecophysiology of metal uptake by tolerant plants. In: Shaw AJ (ed) Heavy metal tolerance in plants: evolutionary aspects. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 155–177
Baker AJM, Reeves RD, McGrath SP (1991) In situ decontamination of heavy metal polluted soils using crops of metal-accumulating plants—a feasibility study. In: Hinchee RE, Olfenbuttel RF (eds) In situ bioreclamation. Butterworth-Heinemann, Stoneham, pp 539–544
Barajas-Aceves M (2005) Comparison of different microbial biomass and activity measurement methods in metal-contaminated soils. Bioresour Technol 96:1405–1414. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2004.09.013
Bardgett RD, Speir TW, Ross DJ, Yeates GW, Kettles HA (1994) Impact of pasture contamination by copper chromium and arsenic timber preservatives on soil microbial properties and nematodes. Biol Fertil Soils 18:71–79. doi:10.1007/BF00336448
Boonyapookana B, Parkplan P, Techapinyawat S, DeLaune RD, Jugsujinda A (2005) Phytoaccumulation of lead by sunflower (Helianthus annuus), tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum), and vetiver (Vetiveria zizanioides). J Environ Sci Heal 40:117–137. doi:10.1081/ESE-200033621
Brannon JM, Patrick WH (1987) Fixation, transformation, and mobilization of arsenic in sediments. Environ Sci Technol 21:450–459. doi:10.1021/es00159a005
Brookes PC (1995) The use of microbial parameters in monitoring soil pollution by heavy metals. Biol Fertil Soils 19:269–279. doi:10.1007/BF00336094
Brookes PC, McGrath SP (1984) Effect of metal toxicity and the size of the soil microbial biomass. Eur J Soil Sci 35:341–346. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.1984.tb00288.x
Brookes PC, McGrath SP, Heijnen C (1986) Metal residues in soils previously treated with sewage-sludge and their effects on growth and nitrogen fixation by blue-green algae. Soil Biol Biochem 18:345–353. doi:10.1016/0038-0717(86)90037-4
Brown GK, McCarthy P, Leenheer JA (1999) Simultaneous determination of Ca, Cu, Ni, Zn and Cd binding strength with fulvic acid fractions. Anal Chim Acta 402:169–181
Bruins S, Kapil S, Oehme FW (2000) Microbial resistance to metals in the environment. Ecotoxicol Environ Safe 45:198–207. doi:10.1006/eesa.1999.1860
Burkhardt EM, Bischoff S, Akob DM, Büchel G, Küsel K (2010) Heavy metal tolerance of Fe(III)-reducing microbial communities in a contaminated creek bank soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 77(9):3132–3136. doi:10.1128/AEM.02085-10
Burns RG (1978) Soil enzymes. Academic Press, London
Caille N, Swanwick S, Zhao FJ, McGrath SP (2004) Arsenic hyperaccumulation by Pteris vittata from arsenic contaminated soils and the effect of liming and phosphate fertilization. Environ Pollut 132:113–120. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2004.03.018
Cameron K, Beare M, Mclaren R, Hong D (1998) Selecting physical, chemical and biological indicators of soil quality for degraded or polluted soils. In: Symposium at the 16th world congress of soil science, Montpellier, France, paper no. 2516
Castaldi S, Rutigliano FA, Virzo De Santo A (2004) Suitability of soil microbial parameters as indicators of heavy metal pollution. Water Air Soil Pollut 158:21–35. doi:10.1023/B:WATE.0000044824.88079.d9
CEC: Commission of the European Communities (1986) Council Directives of 12 June 1986 on the protection of the environment, and in particular of the soils, when sewage sludge is used in agriculture. Off J Eur Commun L181(86/278/EEC):6–12
Chander K, Brookes PC (1991) Effects of heavy metals from past applications of sewage sludge on microbial biomass and organic matter accumulation in a sandy loam and a silty loam UK soil. Soil Biol Biochem 23:927–932. doi:10.1016/0038-0717(91)90172-G
Chandra SK, Kamala CT, Chary NS, Balaram V, Garcia G (2005) Potential of Hemidesmus indicus for phytoextraction of lead from industrially contaminated soils. Chemosphere 58:507–514. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.09.022
Chang JS, Hwang YP, Fong YM, Lin PJ (1999) Detoxification of mercury by immobilized mercuric reductase. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 74:965–973. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4660(199910)74:10<965:AID-JCTB135>3.0.CO;2-R
Chaudhary AM, McGrath SP (1996) Toxicity of organic compounds to the indigenous population of Rhizobium Leguminosarum biovar trifolii in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 28:1483–1487. doi:10.1016/S0038-0717(96)00156-3
Chaudri AM, McGrath SP, Giller KE, Angle JS, Chaney RL (1993) Screening of isolates and strains of Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar trifolii for heavy metal resistance using buffered media. Environ Toxicol Chem 12:1643–1651. doi:10.1002/etc.5620120913
Chen HM, Zheng CR, Tu C, Shen ZG (2000) Chemical methods and phytoremediation of soil contaminated with heavy metals. Chemosphere 41:229–234. doi:10.1016/S0045-6535(99)00415-4
Christensen TH (1984) Cadmium soil sorption at low concentration. I. Effect of time, cadmium load, pH and calcium. Water Air Soil Pollut 21:105–114. doi:10.1007/BF00163616
Collins YE, Stotzky G (1992) Heavy metals alter the electro-kinetic properties of bacteria, yeast and clay minerals. Appl Environ Microbiol 58:1592–1600
Dahmani-Muller H, van Oort F, Gelie B, Balabane M (2000) Strategies of heavy metal uptake by three plant species growing near a metal smelter. Environ Pollut 109:231–238
de Souza MP, Chu D, Zhao M, Zayed AM, Ruzin SE, Schichnes D, Terry N (1999) Rhizosphere bacteria enhance selenium accumulation and volatilization by Indian mustard. Plant Physiol 119:565–574
Dias HE Jr, Moreira FMS, Siquera JO, Silva R (1998) Heavy metals, microbial density and activity in a soil contaminated with wastes from the zinc industry. Rev Bras Cienc Solo 22:631–640
Dick RP (1997) Soil enzyme activities as integrative indicators of soil health. In: Pankhurst CE, Doube BM, Gupta VVSR (eds) Biological indicators of soil health. CAB, Wallingford, pp 121–156
Dick RP, Breakwell DP, Turco RF (1996) Soil enzyme activities and biodiversity measurements as integrative microbiological indicators. In: Dick RP, Lal R, Lowery B, Rice CW, Stott DE (eds) Methods of assessing soil quality. SSSA Spec Publ No. 49, Madison, pp 247–271
Dommergues YR, Diem HD, Ganry F (1980) The effect of soil microorganisms on plant productivity. Microbiologist. OSTROM/CNRS, Dakar, Senegal and CNRA/ISRA, Bambey, Senegal
Ebbs SD, Kochian LV (1998) Phytoextraction of zinc by oat (Avena sativa), barley (Hordeum vulgare), and Indian mustard (Brassica juncea). Environ Sci Technol 32:802–806
Ebbs SD, Lasat MM, Brandy DJ, Cornish J, Gordon R, Kochian LV (1997) Phytoextraction of cadmium and zinc from a contaminated soil. J Environ Qual 26:1424–1430. doi:10.2134/jeq1997.00472425002600050032x
Eisler R (1988) Lead hazards to fish, wildlife and invertebrates: a synoptic review. Biological report 85 (1.14). United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Emmerling C, Schloter M, Hartmann A, Kandeler E (2002) Functional diversity of soil organisms, a review of recent research activities in Germany. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 165:408–420. doi:10.1002/1522-2624(200208)165:4<408:AID-JPLN408>3.0.CO;2-3
Entry JA, Watrud LS, Reeves M (1999) Accumulation of 137Cs and 90Sr from contaminated soil by three grass species inoculated with mycorrhizal fungi. Environ Pollut 104:449–457. doi:10.1016/S0269-7491(98)00163-8
Feng D, Aldrich C (2004) Adsorption of heavy metals by biomaterials derived from the marine alga Ecklonia maxima. Hydrometallurgy 73:1–10. doi:10.1016/S0304-386X(03)00138-5
Fierer N, Jackson RB (2006) The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:626–631
Filser J, Fromm H, Nagel RF, Winter K (1995) Effects of previously intensive agricultural management on microorganisms and biodiversity of soil fauna. Plant Soil 170:123–129. doi:10.1007/BF02183060
Fine P, Scagnossi A, Chen Y, Milgelgrin U (2005) Practical and mechanistic aspects of the removal of cadmium from aqueous systems using peat. Environ Pollut 138:358–367. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2005.03.003
Francis AJ, Dodge CJ (1998) Remediation of soils and wastes contaminated with uranium and toxic metals. Environ Sci Technol 32:3933–3998
Frattini CJ, Ledue LG, Ferroni GD (2000) Strain variability and effect of organic compounds on the growth of the chemolithotrophic bacteriumThiobacillus ferrooxidans. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 77:57–64
Freedman B, Hutchinson TC (1980) Effects of smelter pollutants on forest leaf litter decomposition near a nickel copper smelter at Sudbury, Ontario. Can J Bot Q8:1722–1736. doi:10.1139/b80-200
Fritze H, Vanhala P, Pietikäinen J, Mälkönen E (1996) Vitality fertilization of Scots pine stands growing along a gradient of heavy metal pollution: short-term effects on microbial biomass and respiration rate of the humus layer. Fresenius J Anal Chem 354:750–755. doi:10.1007/s0021663540750
Frostegard A, Tunlid A, Baath E (1993) Phospholipid fatty acid composition, biomass, and activity of microbial communities from 2 soil types experimentally exposed to different heavy-metals. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:3605–3617
Gadd GM (1990) Heavy metal accumulation by bacteria and other microorganisms. Experientia 46:835–840. doi:10.1007/BF01935534
Gadd GM (1993) Microbial formation and transformation of organometallic and organometalloid compounds. FEMS Microbiol Rev 11:297–316. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.1993.tb00003.x
Gadd GM (2000) Bioremedial potential of microbial mechanisms of metal mobilization and immobilization. Environ Biotechnol 11:271–279. doi:10.1016/S0958-1669(00)00095-1
Gadd GM (2004) Microbial influence on metal mobility and application for bioremediation. Geoderma 122:109–119. doi:10.1016/jgeoderma.2004.01.002
Gadd GM, Griffiths AJ (1978) Microorganisms and heavy metal toxicity. Microb Ecol 4:303–317. doi:10.1007/BF02013274
Gao Y, Zhou P, Mao L, Zhi Y, Shi W-J (2010) Assessment of effects of heavy metals combined pollution on soil enzyme activities and microbial community structure: modified ecological dose–response model and PCR-RAPD. Environ Earth Sci 60:603–612. doi:10.1007/s12665-009-0200-8
Gardea-Torresdey JL, Gonzalez JH, Tiemann KJ, Rodriguez O, Gamez G (1998) Phytofiltration of hazardous cadmium, chromium, lead and zinc ions by biomass of Medicago sativa (alfalfa). J Hazard Mater 57:29–39. doi:10.1016/S0304-3894(97)00072-1
Gharieb MM, Gadd GM (1998) Evidence for the involvement of vacuolar activity in metal(loid)s tolerance: vacuola-lacking and defective mutants ofSaccharomyces cerevisiae display higher sensitivity to chromate, telurite and selenite. Biometals 11:101–106. doi:10.1023/A:1009221810760
Gharieb MM, Kierans M, Gadd GM (1999) Transformation and tolerance of tellurite by filamentous fungi: accumulation, reduction and volatilization. Mycol Res 103:299–305. doi:10.1017/S0953756298007102
Giller KE, McGrath SP, Hirsch PR (1989) Absence of nitrogen fixation in clover grown in soil subject to long-term contamination with heavy metals is due to ineffective Rhizobium. Soil Biol Biochem 21:841–848. doi:10.1016/0038-0717(89)90179-X
Giller KE, Nitter E, McGrath SP (1998) Toxicity of heavy metals to microorganisms and microbial processes in agricultural soils: a review. Soil Biol Biochem 30:1389–1414. doi:10.1016/S0038-0717(97)00270-8
Giller KE, Witter E, McGrath SP (2009) Heavy metals and soil microbes. Soil Biol Biochem 41:2031–2037. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.04.026
Goel S, Malik JA, Nayyar H (2009) Molecular approach for phytoremediation of metal contaminated sites. Arch Agron Soil Sci 55:451–475. doi:10.1080/03650340902832861
Göhre V, Paszkowski U (2006) Contribution of the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis to heavy metal phytoremediation. Planta 223:1115–1122. doi:10.1007/s00425-006-0225-0
Gounou C, Bousserrhine N, Varrault G, Mouchel J-M (2010) Influence of the Iron-reducing bacteria on the release of heavy metals in anaerobic river sediment. Water Air Soil Pollut. doi:10.1007/s11270-010-0327-y
Gravot A, Lieutaud A, Verret F, Auroy P, Vavasseur A, Richaud P (2004) AtHMA3, a plant P1B-ATPase, functions as a Cd/Pb transporter in yeast. FEBS Lett 561:22–28. doi:10.1016/S0014-5793(04)00072-9
Groot JR, Houba VG (1995) A comparison of different indices of nitrogen mineralization. Biol Fertil Soils 19:1–9. doi:10.1007/BF00336338
Harrington JM, Fendorf SE, Rosenzweig RF (1998) Biotic generation of arsenic (III) in metal(loid)-contaminated freshwater lake sediments. Environ Sci Technol 32:2425–2430
Harris PG (1994) Consequences of the spatial distribution of microbial communities in soil. In: Ritz K, Dighton J, Giller KE (eds) Beyond the biomass. Compositional and functional analysis of soil microbial communities. Wiley, Chichester, pp 239–246
Harris J (2009) Soil Microbial communities and restoration ecology: facilitators or followers? Science 325:573–574. doi:10.1126/science.1172975
Hassen A, Saidi N, Cherif M, Bondabous A (1998) Resistance of environmental bacteria in heavy metals. Bioresour Technol 64:7–15. doi:10.1016/S0960-8524(97)00161-2
Hayat S, Ahmad I, Azam ZM, Ahmad A, Inam A, Samullah A (2002) Effect of long-term application of oil refinery waste water on soil health. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 17:379–384. doi:10.1016/S0960-8524(02)00027-5
Hirayama T, Kieber JJ, Hirayama N, Kogan M, Guzman P, Nourizadeh S, Alonso JM, Dailey WP, Dancis A, Ecker JR (1999) Responsive-to-antagonist1, a Menkes/Wilson disease related copper transporter, is required for ethylene signaling in Arabidopsis. Cell 97:383–393. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80747-3
Hobman JL, Wilson JR, Brown NL (2000) Microbial mercury reduction. In: Lovley DR (ed) Environmental microbe–metal interactions. Am Soc Microbiol, Washington, pp 177–197
Holmes D, Finneran K, O’Neil R, Lovley D (2002) Enrichment of members of the family Geobacteraceae associated with stimulation of dissimilatory metal reduction in uranium-contaminated aquifer and sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 68(5):2300–2306
Hoppe S, Sundbum M, Borg H, Breitholtz M (2015) Prediction of Cu toxicity in three aquatic species using bioavailability tools in four Swedish soft freshwaters. Environ Sci Eur 27:25. doi:10.1186/s12302-015-0058-1
Horckmans L, Swennen R, Deckers J (2007) Retention and release of Zn and Cd in spodic horizons as determined by pHstat analysis and single extractions. Sci Total Environ 376:86–89. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.01.077
Hund-Rinke K, Kordel W (2003) Underlying issues on bioassessibility and bioavailability: experimental methods. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 56:52–62. doi:10.1016/S0147-6513(03)00050-2
Jarup L (2003) Hazards of heavy metal contamination. Br Med Bullet 68:167–182. doi:10.1093/bmb/ldg032
Kabata-Pendias A (2001) Trace elements in soils and plants, 3rd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Kamaludeen SPB, Ramasamy K (2008) Rhizoremediation of metals: harnessing microbial communities. Indian J Microbiol 48:80–88. doi:10.1007/s12088-008-0008-3
Kandeler E, Kampichler C, Horak O (1996) Influence of heavy metals on functional diversity of soil microbial communities. Biol Fertil Soils 23:299–306. doi:10.1007/BF00335958
Kandeler E, Tscherko D, Bruce KD, Stemmer M, Hobbs PJ, Bardgett RD, Amelung W (2000) Structure and function of the soil microbial community in microhabitats of a heavy metal polluted soil. Biol Fertil Soils 32:390–400. doi:10.1007/s003740000268
Kara Ö, Bolat I, Çakıroğlu K, Öztürk M (2008) Plant canopy effects on litter accumulation and soil microbial biomass in two temperate forests. Biol Fertil Soils 45:193–198. doi:10.1007/s00374-008-0327-x
Kemner KM, Kelly SD, Lai B, Maser J, O’Loughlin EJ, Sholto-Douglas D, Cai Z, Schneegurt MA, Kulpa-Jr CF, Nealson KH (2004) Elemental and redox analysis of single bacterial cells by X-ray microbeam analysis. Sci Mag 306(5696):686–687. doi:10.1126/science.1103524
Khan MS, Zaidi A, Wani PA, Oves M (2009) Role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in the remediation of metal contaminated soils. Environ Chem Lett 7:1–19. doi:10.1007/s10311-008-0155-0
Kirkham MB (2006) Cadmium in plants and polluted soils: effects of soil factors, hyperaccumulation and amendments. Geoderma 137:19–32. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2006.08.024
Kizilkaya R, Aşkin T, Bayrakli B, Sağlam M (2004) Microbiological characteristics of soils contaminated with heavy metals. Eur J Soil Biol 40:95–102. doi:10.1016/j.ejsobi.2004.10.002
Knight BP, McGrath SP, Chaudri AM (1997) Biomass carbon measurements and substrate utilization patterns of microbial populations from soils amended with cadmium, copper, or zinc. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:39–43
Kumar PBAN, Dushenkov V, Motto H, Raskin I (1995) Phytoextraction: the use of plants to remove heavy metals from soils. Environ Sci Technol 29:1232–1238. doi:10.1021/es00005a014
Kuperman RG, Carreiro MM (1997) Soils heavy metal concentration, microbial biomass and enzyme activities in a contaminated grassland ecosystem. Soil Biol Biochem 29:179–190. doi:10.1016/S0038-0717(96)00297-0
Lăcătuşu R, Rauta C, Carstea S, Ghelase I (1996) Soil–plant–man relationships in heavy metal polluted area in Romania. Appl Geochem 11:105–107. doi:10.1016/0883-2927(95)00101-8
Lavelle P, Brussards L, Hendrix P (1999) Earthworm management in tropical agroecosystems. CABI, Wallingford
Leita L, De Nobili M, Muhlbachova G, Mondini C, Marchiol L, Zerbi G (1995) Bioavailability and effects of heavy metals on soil microbial biomass survival during laboratory incubation. Biol Fertil Soils 19:103–108. doi:10.1007/BF00336144
Linton PE, Shotbolt L, Thomas AD (2007) Microbial communities in long-term heavy metal contaminated ombrotrophic peats. Water Air Soil Pollut 186:97–113. doi:10.1007/s11270-007-9468-z
Lipman CB, Burgess PS (1914) The effects of copper, zinc, iron and lead salts on ammonification and nitrification in soils. Univ Calif Publ Agric Sci 1:127–139
Lloyd JR, Sole VA, Van Praagh CVG, Lovley DR (2000) Direct and Fe(II)-mediated reduction of technetium by Fe(III)-reducing bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 66(9):3743–3749. doi:10.1128/AEM.66.9.3743-3749.2000
Lock K, Janssen CR (2003) Influence of aging on metal availability in soils. Rev Environ Contamin Toxicol 178:1–21. doi:10.1007/0-387-21728-2_1
Lombi E, Zhao FJ, Dunham SJ, McGrath SP (2001) Phytoremediation of heavy metal-contaminated soils. J Environ Qual 30:1919–1926. doi:10.2134/jeq2001.1919
Lovley DR, (2000) Fe(III) and Mn(IV) reduction. In: Lovley DR (ed) Environmental microbe–metal interactions. Am Soc Microbiol, Washington, pp 3–30
Ma LQ, Komar KM, Tu C, Zhang W, Cai Y, Kennelley ED (2001) A fern that hyperaccumulates arsenic. Nature 409:579. doi:10.1038/35054664
Macaskie LE, Dean ACR (1989) Microbial metabolism, desolubilization and deposition of heavy metals: uptake by immobilized cells and application to the treatment of liquid wastes. In: Mizrahi A (ed) Biological waste treatment. Alan R. Liss, New York, pp 150–201
Madejon P, Murillo JM, Maranon T, Cabrera F, Lopez R (2002) Bioaccumulation of As, Cd, Cu, Fe and Lead in wild grasses affected by the Aznalcollar mine spill (SW Spain). Sci Total Environ 290:105–120
Madhaiyan M, Poonguzhali S, Sa T (2007) Metal tolerating methylotrophic bacteria reduces nickel and cadmium toxicity and promotes plant growth of tomato (lycopersicon esculentum L.). Chemosphere 69:220–228. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.04.017
Mary B, Recous S, Darwis D, Robins D (1996) Interactions between decomposition of plant residues and nitrogen cycling in soil. Plant Soil 181:71–82. doi:10.1007/BF00011294
McGrath SP, Brookes PC, Giller KE (1988) Effects of potentially toxic metals in soil derived from past applications of sewage sludge on nitrogen fixation by Trifolium repens L. Soil Biol Biochem 20:415–424. doi:10.1016/0038-0717(88)90052-1
McGrath SP, Zhao FJ, Lombi E (2002) Phytoremediation of metals, metalloids, and radionuclides. Adv Agron 75:1–56. doi:10.1016/S0065-2113(02)75002-5
Megharaj KVM, Sethunathan N, Naidu R (2003) Bioavailability and toxicity of cadmium to microorganisms and their activities in soil: a review. Adv Environ Res 8:121–135. doi:10.1016/S1093-0191(02)00135-1
Mehmood T, Akbar Malik S, Hussain ST (2009) Roles of microbes in nitrogen and metal hyperaccumulation by toxilaion Eichhornia crassipes. Afr J Microbiol Res 3(12):914–924
Méndez MO, Maier RM (2008) Phytostabilization of mine tailings in arid and semiarid environments—an emerging remediation technology. Environ Health Perspect 116(3):278–283. doi:10.1289/ehp.10608
Misra V, Tiwari A, Shukla B, Seth CS (2009) Effects of soil amendments on the bioavailability of heavy metals from zinc mine tailings. Environ Monitor Assess 155:467–475. doi:10.1007/s10661-008-0449-5
Morales-Barrera L, Cristiani-Urbina E (2008) Hexavalent chromium removal by a Trichoderma inhamatum fungal strain isolated from tannery effluent. Water Air Soil Pollut 187:327–336. doi:10.1007/s11270-007-9520-z
Moreno JL, Hernàndez T, García C (1999) Effects of a cadmium contaminated sewage sludge compost on dynamics of organic matter and microbial activity in an arid soil. Biol Fertil Soils 28:230–237. doi:10.1007/s003740050487
Moreno JL, Landi C, García L, Falchini L, Pietramellara G, Nannipieri P (2001) The ecological dose value (ED50) for assessing Cd toxicity on ATP content and dehydrogenase and urease activities of soil. Soil Biol Biochem 33:483–489. doi:10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00189-9
Moreno JL, García C, Hernàndez T (2003) Toxic effect of cadmium and nickel on soil enzymes and the influence of adding sewage sludge. Eur J Soil Sci 54:377–386. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2389.2003.00533.x
Mudgal V, Madaan N, Mudgal A (2010) Heavy metals in plants: phytoremediation: plants used to remediate heavy metal pollution. Agric Biol J North Am 1:40–46.
Muhlbachova G, Simon T (2003) Effects of zeolite amendment on microbial biomass and respiratory activity in heavy metals contaminated soil. Plant Soil Environ 49:536–541
Muhulbachova G, Tlustos P (2006) Effects of liming on the microbial biomass and its activities in soil long-term contaminated by toxic metals. Plant Soil Environ Manag 9:115–121
Naees M, Ali Q, Shahbaz M, Ali F (2011) Roles of rhizobacteria in phytoremediation of heavy metals: an overview. Int Res J Plant Sci 2(8):220–232
Naidu R, Kookana RS, Sumner ME, Harter RD, Tiller KG (1997) Cadmium sorption and transport in variable charged soils: a review. J Environ Qual 26:602–617. doi:10.2134/jeq1997.00472425002600030004x
Naidu R, Oliver D, McConnell S (2003) Heavy metal phytotoxicity in soils. In: Proceedings of the fifth national workshop on the assessment of site contamination. National Environmental Protection Council, Australia, pp 235–241
Naidu R, Rogers S, Gupta VVSR, Kookana RS, Bolan NS, Andriano D (2006) Bioavailability of heavy metals in the soil-plant environment and its potential role in risk assessment an over view. In: 4th International conference on the biogeochemistry of trace elements, pp 757–758
Novarro-Noya YE, Jan-Roblero J, Gonzàlez-Chàvez MDC, Hernàndez-Gama R, Hernàndez-Rodríguez C (2010) Bacterial communities associated with the rhizosphere of pioneer plants (Bahia xylopoda and Viguiera linearis). Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 97:335–349. doi:10.1007/s10482-010-9413-9
Nriagu JO (1990) The rise and fall of leaded gasoline. Sci Total Environ 92:13–28. doi:10.1016/0048-9697(90)90318-O
Olsen BH, Thornton I (1982) The resistance pattern to metals of bacterial population in contaminated land. Eur J Soil Sci 33:271–277. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.1982.tb01765.x
Oremland RS, Steinberg NA, Presser TS, Miller LG (1991) In situ bacterial selenate reduction in the agricultural drainage systems of Western Nevada. Appl Environ Microbiol 57:615–617
Osborn D, Eney WJ, Bull KR (1983) The toxicity of trialkyl lead compounds to lead. Environ Pollut 31:261–275. doi:10.1016/0143-1471(83)90063-6
Pajuelo E, Rodríguez-Llorente ID, Lafuente A, Caviedes MA (2011) Legume-Rhizobium symbioses as a tool for bioremediation of heavy metal polluted soils. In: Khan MS, Zaidi A, Goel R, Musarrat J (eds) Biomanagement of metal-contaminated soils. Environmental pollution, vol 20. Springer, New York, pp 95–124. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1914-9_4
Pankhurst CE, Hawke BG, McDonald HJ, Kirkby CA, Buckerfield JC, Michelsen P, O’Brien KA, Gupta VVSR, Doube BM (1995) Evaluation of soil biological properties as potential bioindicators of soil health. Anim Prod Sci 35:1015–1028. doi:10.1071/EA9951015
Pathak A, Dastidar MG, Sreskrishan TR (2009) Review bioleaching of heavy metals from sewage sludge: a review. J Environ Manag 90:2343–2353. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.11.005
Pelczar MJ Jr, Chen ECS, Krleg NR (1986) Microbiology, 5th edn. McGraw Hill, New York
Phillips EJP, Landa ER, Lovley DR (1995) Remediation of uranium contaminated soils with bicarbonate extraction and microbial U(VI) reduction. J Ind Microbiol 14:203–207. doi:10.1007/BF01569928
Pipe AE (1992) Pesticide effect on soil algae and cynobacteria. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 127:95–170. doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-9751-9_4
Pishchik VN, Provorov NA, Vorobyov NI, Chizevskaya EP, Safronova VI, Tuev AN, Kozhemyakov AP (2009) Interactions between plants and associated bacteria in soils contaminated with heavy metals. Microbiology 78:785–793. doi:10.1134/S0026261709060162
Pongratz R, Heumann KG (1999) Production of methylated mercury, lead and cadmium by marine bacteria as a significant natural source for atmospheric heavy metals in Polar Regions. Chemosphere 39:89–102. doi:10.1016/S0045-6535(98)00591-8
Prasad NMV, Freitas HMD (2003) Metal hyperaccumulation in plants—biodiversity prospecting for phytoremediation technology. Electr J Biotechnol 6:286–321. http://www.ejbiotechnology.info/content/vol6/issue3/full/6
Rajaniemi TK, Allison VJ (2009) Abiotic conditions and plant cover differentially affect microbial biomass and community composition on dune gradients. Soil Biol Biochem 41:102–109. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.10.001
Rama Rao VS, Wilson CH, Maruthi Mohan P (1997) Zinc resistance inNeurospora crassa. Biometals 10:147–156. doi:10.1023/A:1018339425355
Rasmussen LD, Sorensen SJ (2001) Effects of mercury contamination on the culturable heterotrophic, functional and genetic diversity of the bacterial community in soil. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 36:1–9
Rathnayake VN, Megharaj M, Bolan N, Naidu R (2010) Tolerance of heavy metals to gram positive soil bacteria. Int J Civ Environ Eng 2(4):191–195
Rattan RK, Datta SP, Chandra S, Saharan N (2002) Heavy metals and environmental quality: Indian scenario. Fertil News 47(11):21–40
Reeves RD, Baker AJM (2000) Metal-accumulating plants. In: Raskin I, Ensley BD (eds) Phytoremediation of toxic metals: using plants to clean-up the environment. Wiley, New York, pp 193–230
Rehman A, Anjum MS (2010) Cadmium Uptake by Yeast, Candida tropicalis, isolated from industrial effluents and its potential use in wastewater clean-up operations. Water Air Soil Pollut 205:149–159. doi:10.1007/s11270-009-0062-4
Rehman A, Farooq H, Shakoori AR (2007) Copper tolerant yeast, Candida tropicalis, isolated from industrial effluents: its potential use in wastewater treatment. Pak J Zool 39:405–412
Renella G, Ortigoza ALR, Landi L, Nannipieri P (2003) Additive effects of copper and zinc on cadmium toxicity on phosphatase activities and ATP content of soil as estimated by the ecological dose (ED50). Soil Biol Biochem 35:1203–1210. doi:10.1016/S0038-0717(03)00181-0
Ribeiro AR, Umbuzeiro GD (2014) Effects of a textile azo dye on mortality, regeneration, and productive performance of the planarian, Girardia tigrina. Environ Sci Eur 26:22. http://www.enveurope.com/content/26/1/22
Roane TM, Pepper IL (1989) Microbial responses to environmentally toxic cadmium. Microbial Ecol 38:358–364. doi:10.1007/s002489901001
Rosen BP (2002) Transport and detoxification systems for transition metals, heavy metals and metalloids in eukaryotic and prokaryotic microbes. Comp Biochem Physiol Part A Mol Integr Physiol 133:689–693. doi:10.1016/S1095-6433(02)00201-5
Salazar MJ, Rodriguez JH, Cid CV, Bernardelli CE, Donati ER, Pignata ML (2016) Soil variables that determines lead accumulation in Bidens pilosa L. and Tagetes minuta L. growing on polluted soils. Geoderma 279:97–108. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.06.011
Salt DE, Blaylock M, Kumar NPBA, Dushenkov V, Ensley D, Chet I, Raskin I (1995) Phytoremediation: a novel strategy for the removal of toxic metals from the environment using plants. Nat Biotechnol 13:468–474. doi:10.1038/nbt0595-468
Salt DE, Smith RD, Raskin I (1998) Phytoremediation. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 49:643–668. doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.49.1.643
Schuller E (1989) Enzyme activities and microbial biomass in old landfill soils with long-term metal pollution. Verh Ges Okol 18:339–348
Sekhar KC, Kamala CT, Chary NS, Sastry ARK, Rao TN, Vairamani M (2004) Removal of lead from aqueous solutions using an immobilized biomaterial derived from a plant biomass. J Hazard Mater 108:111–117. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.01.013
Shakoori AR, Qureshi F (2000) Cadmium resistant bacteria from industrial effluents and their role in environmental clean-up. Pak J Zool 32:165–178
Shakoori AR, Rehman A, Haq RU (2004) Multiple metal resistance in the ciliate protozoan, Vorticella microstoma, isolated from industrial effluents and its potential in bioremediation of toxic wastes. Bull Environ Contamin Toxicol 72:1046–1051. doi:10.1007/s00128-004-0349-5
Sheng PX, Ting Y-P, Chen JP, Hong L (2004) Sorption of lead, copper, cadmium, zinc, and nickel by marine algal biomass: characterization of biosorptive capacity and investigation of mechanisms. J Coll Interf Sci 275:131–141. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2004.01.036
Shuman LM (1985) Fractionation method for soil microelements. Soil Sci 140:11–22. OSTI ID: 6337444
Silver S, Phung LT (2005) A bacterial view of the periodic table: genes and proteins for toxic inorganic ions. J Ind Microbiol Biotech 32:587–605. doi:10.1007/s10295-005-0019-6
Simmonds MA (1979) Tertiary treatment with aquatic macrophytes. Prog Water Technol 11:507–518
Simona C, Angela RF, Santo Amalia VD (2004) Suitability of soil microbial parameters as indicators of heavy metal pollution. Water Air Soil Pollut 158(1):21–35. doi:10.1023/B:WATE.0000044824.88079.d9
Smejkalova M, Mikanova O, Boruvka L (2003) Effects of heavy metals concentrations on biological activity of soil micro-organisms. Plant Soil Environ 49:321–326
Smith SR (1991) Effects of sewage sludge application on soil microbial processes and soil fertility. Adv Soil Sci 16:191–212. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-3144-8_4
Smith WL, Gadd GM (2000) Reduction and precipitation of chromate by mixed culture sulphate-reducing bacterial biofilms. J Appl Microbiol 88:983–991. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.01066.x
Spain A, Alm D (2003) Implications of microbial heavy metal tolerance in the environment. Rev Undergrad Res 2:1–6
Sparling GP (1992) Ratio of microbial biomass carbon as a scientific indicator of changes in soil organic matter. Aust J Soil Res 30:195–207. doi:10.1071/SR9920195
Sposito G (2008) The chemistry of soils, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York
Strojan CL (1978) Forest leaf litter decomposition in the vicinity of a zinc smelter. Oecologia 32:203–212. doi:10.1007/BF00366072
Subhani A, Changyong H, Zhengmiao X, Min L, Elghawry AM (2001) Impact of soil environment and agricultural practices on microbial/dehydrogenase enzyme activity in soil: a review. Pak J Biol Sci 4:333–338
Swift MJ, Bignell DE, Moreira FMS, Huising EJ (2008) The inventory of soil biological diversity: concepts and General guidelines. In: Fatima MS, Moreira E, Jeroen H, David EB (eds) A handbook of tropical soil biology: sampling and characterization of below-ground biodiversity. Earthscan Publishers, New York
Tack FMG, Van Ranst E, Lievens C, Vandenberghe RE (2006) Soil solution Cd, Cu and Zn concentrations as affected by short-time drying or wetting: the role of hydrous oxides of Fe and Mn. Geoderma 137:83–87. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2006.07.003
Tarradelas J, Bitton G, Rossel D (2005) Soil ecotoxicology. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Thomine S, Wang R, Ward JM, Crawford NM, Schroeder JI (2000) Cadmium and iron transport by members of a plant metal transporter family inArabidopsis with homology to Nramp genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:4991–4996
Timothy AA, David M, Linda M, Annette P, Eric D, Chris T, Kristin C (1999) Baseline human and ecological risk assessment. Lower Fox River Wisconsin. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison
Trevors JT, Stratton GW, Gadd GM (1986) Cadmium transport, resistance, and toxicity in bacteria, algae, and fungi. Can J Microbiol 32:447–464. doi:10.1139/m86-085
Türkdoğan MK, Kilicel F, Kara K, Tuncer I, Uygan I (2003) Heavy metals in soil, vegetables and fruits in the endemic upper gastrointestinal cancer region of Turkey. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 13:175–179. doi:10.1016/S1382-6689(02)00156-4
Turpeinen R (2002) Interactions between metals, microbes and plants—bioremediation of arsenic and lead contaminated soils. PhD dissertation, Department of Ecological and Environmental Science, University of Helsinki
Vig K, Megharaj M, Sethunathan N, Naidu R (2003) Bioavailability and toxicity of cadmium to microorganisms and their activities in soil: a review. Adv Environ Res 8:121–135. doi:10.1016/S1093-0191(02)00135-1
Wang Y, Shi J, Wang H, Lin Q, Chen X (2007) The influence of soil heavy metals pollution on soil microbial biomass, enzyme activity, and community composition near a copper smelter. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 67:75–81. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2006.03.007
Wang J, Zhang CB, Jin ZX (2009) The distribution and phytoavailability of heavy metal fractions in rhizosphere soils of Paulowniu fortunei (seem) Hems near a Pb/Zn smelter in Guangdong, PR China. Geoderma 148:299–306. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.10.015
Wang Y, Zhan M, Zhu H, Guo S, Wang W, Xue B (2011) Distribution and accumulation of metals in soils and plant from a lead–zinc mineland in Guangxi, South China. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. doi:10.1007/s00128-011-0473-y
Watanabe ME (1997) Phytoremediation on the brink of commercialization. Environ Sci Technol 31:182–186
Weigand S, Anerwld K, Beck T (1995) Microbial biomass in agricultural top soils after 6 years bare fallow. Biol Fertil Soils 19:129–134. doi:10.1007/BF00336148
Windham L, Weis JS, Weis P (2001) Lead uptake, distribution, and effects in two dominant salt marsh macrophytes, Spartina alterniflora (Cordgrass) and Phragmites australis (Common Reed). Mar Pollut Bull 42(10):811–816. doi:10.1016/S0025-326X(00)00224-1
Witter E, Dahlin S (1995) Microbial utilization of [U-14C]-labeled straw and [U-13C]-labeled glucose in soils of contrasting pH and metal status. Soil Biol Biochem 27:1507–1516. doi:10.1016/0038-0717(95)00107-P
Wu T, Chellemi DO, Graham JH, Martin KJ, Rosskopf EN (2008) Comparison of soil bacterial communities under diverse agricultural land management and crop production practices. Microb Ecol 55:293–310. doi:10.1007/s00248-007-9276-4
Wyszkowska M, Wyszkowski M (2002) Effect of cadmium and magnesium on microbiological activity in soil. Pol J Environ Stud 11:585–591
Xue SG, Chen YX, Reeves RD, Baker AJ, Lin Q, Fernando DR (2004) Manganese uptake and accumulation by the hyperaccumulator plant Phytolacca acinosa Roxb. (Phytolaccaceae). Environ Pollut 131:393–399. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2004.03.011
Yang Z, Liu S, Zheng D, Feng S (2006) Effects of cadmium, zinc and lead on soil enzyme activities. J Environ Sci 18:1135–1141. doi:10.1016/S1001-0742(06)60051-X
Yang R, Tang J, Chen X, Hu S (2007) Effects of coexisting plant species on soil microbes and soil enzymes in metal lead contaminated soils. Appl Soil Ecol 37:240–246. doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2007.07.004
Yao H, Xu J, Huang C (2003) Substrate utilization pattern, biomass and activity of microbial communities in a sequence of heavy metal-polluted paddy soils. Geoderma 115:139–148. doi:10.1016/S0016-7061(03)00083-1
Yeung AT, Hsu C-N (2005) Electrokinetic remediation of cadmium contaminated clay. J Environ Eng 131:298–304. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2005)131:2(298)
Zaguralskaya LM (1997) Microbiological monitoring of forest ecosystems in the northern taiga subzone in conditions of anthropogenic impact. Lesovedenie 5:3–12
Zaidi S, Usmani S, Singh BR, Musarrat J (2006) Significance of Bacillus subtilis strain SJ-101 as a bioinoculant for concurrent plant growth promotion and nickel accumulation in Brassica juncea. Chemosphere 64:991–997. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.12.057
Zhao FJ, Dunham SJ, McGrath SP (2002) Arsenic hyperaccumulation by different fern species. New Phytol 15:27–31. doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00493.x
Zhou JM, Dang Z, Cai M, Liu CQ (2007) Soil heavy metal pollution around the Dabaoshan Mine, Guangdong Province, China. Pedosphere 17:588–594. doi:10.1016/S1002-0160(07)60069-1
Zhuang X, Chen J, Shim H, Bai Z (2007) New advances in plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria for bioremediation. Environ Int 33:406–413. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2006.12.005
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abdu, N., Abdullahi, A.A. & Abdulkadir, A. Heavy metals and soil microbes. Environ Chem Lett 15, 65–84 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-016-0587-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-016-0587-x