Abstract
Vascular development is a central theme in plant science. However, little is known about the mechanism of vascular development in monocotyledons (compared with dicotyledons). Therefore, we investigated sequential processes of differentiation into various different vascular cells by carrying out detailed observations using serial sections of the bases of developing leaves of rice and maize. The developmental process of the longitudinal vascular bundles was divided into six stages in rice and five stages in maize. The initiation of differentiation into procambial progenitor cells forming the commissural vein arose in a circular layer cell that was adjacent to both a metaxylem vessel and one or a few phloem cells in stage V longitudinal vascular bundles. In most cases the differentiation of ground meristem cells into procambial progenitor cells extended in one direction, toward the next longitudinal vascular bundle, and subsequent periclinal divisions and further differentiation produced a vessel element, two companion cells and a sieve element to form a commissural vein. These results suggest the presence of an intercellular signal(s) that induces differentiation of the circular layer cell and the ground meristem cells into procambial progenitor cells, forming a commissural vein sequentially.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The vascular system in higher plants, which consists of the xylem and the phloem, is distributed throughout the entire body of the plant. The xylem is responsible for the long-distance transport of water and dissolved mineral nutrients, while the phloem is responsible for the transport of the photoassimilates from the leaf to the rest of the plant. The vascular system is also important because it provides the internal skeletal structure to reinforce the mechanical strength of the plant. The study of vascular pattern formation is, therefore, an attractive theme in plant science. Genetic and molecular biological analyses with a model plant, Arabidopsis, have revealed various factors that are involved in vascular pattern formation in leaves. Detailed analysis of mutants defective in vein continuity, such as van3/scr (Koizumi et al. 2005; Sieburth et al. 2006), cvp1 (Carland et al. 2002), and cvp2 (Carland and Nelson 2004), revealed the involvement of ARF-GAP-mediated vesicle transport, sterols and inositol triphosphate signaling pathways. Furthermore, localization of PIN proteins as auxin efflux carriers determines the route of auxin flow, which, in turn, results in the vascular pattern along the route (Nelson and Dengler 1997; Berleth et al. 2000; Sachs 2000; Aloni 2001; Dengler 2001; Turner and Sieburth 2002; Mattsson et al. 2003; Scarpella et al. 2006).
Not much is known about the molecular mechanism of vein pattern formation in monocotyledons, although detailed observations of leaf development in many monocotyledon species have been recorded for maize (Sharman 1942; Esau 1943; Kumazawa 1961; Russell and Evert 1985; Langdale et al. 1989; Bosabalidis et al. 1994), wheat (Sharman and Hitch 1967; Blackman 1971; Patrick 1972), barley (Klaus 1966; Dannenhoffer et al. 1990; Dannenhoffer and Evert 1994), rice (Kaufman 1959; Inosaka 1962; Chonan et al. 1974, 1984), sugarcane (Colbert and Evert 1982), Arundinella hirta (Dengler et al. 1996, 1997), and several species including C3 and C4 grass (Crookston and Moss 1974; Brown 1975; Dengler et al. 1985, 1986; Ueno et al. 2006). Monocotyledons generally have narrow, long, blade-shaped leaves. The cell division in the basal zone of the leaf contributes to the one-directional elongation of the leaf. Depending on the leaf structure, the venation pattern in monocotyledonous plants is simple: longitudinal veins lie along the proximodistal axis, and transverse commissural veins connect adjacent longitudinal veins along the mediolateral axis. This simple vascular pattern enables us to investigate the temporal and spatial regulation of the differentiation processes of distinctive vascular cells during vein formation.
Oriza sativa (rice) is an excellent model plant of monocotyledons. Previous anatomical studies have revealed various aspects of vascular system formation such as venation patterns, including the continuation of the vasculature between leaves and stems, and organized patterns of specific cells in the vascular system in rice plants (Yamazaki 1961; Inosaka 1962; Chonan et al. 1974). Although rice is a very useful material for genetic studies, only a few rice mutants have been examined for their venation patterns (Scarpella et al. 2003). Consequently, research carried out to date on vascular tissue in rice has not revealed how specific vascular cells interact with each other and differentiate to form an organized vascular system.
The objective of this study was, therefore, to determine sequential programs of differentiation into various different vascular cells by detailed observations of the process of vascular development, using serial sections of the base of developing rice leaves where vascular tissue was just beginning to differentiate.
Materials and methods
Plants and growth conditions
Oryza sativa L. Japonica cultivar ‘Taichung 65’ and Zea mays L. cultivar ‘Honey bantam’ were used. The rice seeds were surface sterilized (Rueb et al. 1994) and germinated in the dark at 30°C for 2 days on half-strength Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium in which MS vitamins had been replaced with B5 vitamins and supplemented with 60 g/l sucrose, 0.5 g/l 2-morpholinoethanesulfonic acid (MES) monohydrate, and 8.0 g/l agarose. The germinated seeds were grown in a 14-h light:10-h dark cycle at 30°C. The maize seeds were germinated in soil and grown in a 14-h light:10-h dark cycle at 30°C.
Histology
For serial section analysis of the developmental process of the vascular bundle, a 12 mm-long basal part, including the shoot meristem, was collected from 12 rice seedlings 12 days after germination, and a 15 mm-long basal part, including the shoot meristem, was corrected from 12 maize seedlings 14 days after germination. For observation of mature vascular bundles in leaf blades, 8-mm-long tenth leaf blades and seventh leaf blades were prepared from 20 rice plants and 20 maize plants, respectively. These fresh plant tissues were fixed with FAA solution (5% formaldehyde, 5% acetic acid, 90% ethanol; volume ratios) for 2 days at 4°C. The fixed samples were rinsed twice with phosphate buffer (pH 7.2), dehydrated in a graded ethanol series (50%, 70%, 90%, 99.5% and 100%) for 12 h at each ethanol concentration and then in 100% ethanol for 24 h. The samples were then embedded in Technovit 7100 resin (Kulzer and Co., Wehrheim, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Sections (2 μm thick) were cut with an ultramicrotome (Leica Microsystems RM2165, Wetzlar, Germany), dried at 45°C, and stained with 0.01% o-toluidine blue for 2 min in 50 mM citrate buffer (pH 4.4) at 60°C. After being washed with distilled water three times, the samples were mounted in epoxy resin. The mounted samples were observed under an epifluorescence microscope (Olympus BX51, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a 3 charge-coupled device (CCD) digital photographic camera (Hamamatsu Photonics C7780, Hamamatsu, Japan). The images were processed with Adobe Photoshop CS3. Fixed leaf tissues were also directly observed without sectioning, in accordance with the method of Scarpella et al. (2003) for rice and Kuwabara and Nagata (2006) for maize.
Results and discussion
Developmental processes of large vascular bundles in rice and maize
The basic venation pattern in the monocotyledon is generally very simple: it is composed of longitudinal veins (the parallel veins) running parallel along the proximodistal axis in the leaf, and commissural veins (the transverse veins) arranged at almost the same intervals, like ladders, between longitudinal veins (Figs. 1a, 2a). This pattern, which is widely observed in monocotyledons, is generally referred to as ‘striated’. There are three kinds of longitudinal veins in rice leaves: the midvein, the large vascular bundle (Fig. 1b), and the small vascular bundle (Fig. 1c). On the other hand, there are four kinds of longitudinal veins in maize: the midvein, the large vascular bundle (Fig. 2b), the intermediate vascular bundle, and the small vascular bundle (Fig. 2c). The intermediate vascular bundles extend throughout, from the leaf blade to the leaf sheath, while the small vascular bundles stop at the end of the leaf blade. Because, except for this extension, the developmental processes of the intermediate and small vascular bundles are quite similar, and because it is difficult to distinguish between the intermediate and the small vascular bundles from cross-sections, we generally used the small vascular bundles as the term showing veins formed between the large vascular bundles in maize. The midvein, the largest vascular bundle, is positioned in the middle of the leaf, and several large vascular bundles are positioned in a row, from the central zone toward both sides. In the leaf sheath, each small vascular bundle is arranged between two large vascular bundles (Fig. 1d). In the leaf blade, the number of small vascular bundles between the two large vascular bundles changes in proportion to the width of the leaf (Fig. 1e).
In the vascular bundle of rice plants, the xylem vessels and phloem tissue are arranged in the adaxial and abaxial sides, respectively (Fig. 1b, c). The large vascular bundles in the leaf blade have three xylem vessels: a protoxylem vessel and two large metaxylem vessels (Fig. 1b). The small vascular bundles in the leaf blade have some small xylem vessels (Fig. 1c). These vascular tissues are surrounded by two layers of the mestome sheath and the vascular bundle sheath.
In order to elucidate developmental process of the vascular bundle, we observed serial sections of the basal part of 12-day-old rice seedlings (Fig. 3) and 14-day-old maize seedlings (Fig. 4). To ensure the reproducibility, we examined samples from 12 different seedlings. Observations were carried out from the tip to the base of developing leaves so that we could trace back the cell lineage of the veins. The serial sections were sliced (2 μm thick) from the shoot apical meristem (SAM) up to 5 mm (rice plant) and 8 mm (maize). Developing large vascular bundles in the fourth and fifth leaves were clearly observed. This was because their structures were large enough for us to observe the differentiation of each vascular cell morphologically.
Repeated observations revealed a conserved developmental process of the vascular bundle in rice plants (Fig. 3). The leaf primordium consists of a layer of epidermal cells and three layers of ground meristem cells. The procambium of the midvein, the first large vascular bundle, was initiated at the center of the leaf primordium at the collar stage, and subsequent procambium of the large vascular bundles was formed along the mediolateral axis (Fig. 3a). The differentiation process of the vascular cells could be divided into six stages. In the earliest leaf stage, the procambial cells started to differentiate in the middle layer of the three ground meristem cell layers. The outermost cells of the procambium formed the circular layer (stage I, Fig. 3b), and cell division in this layer occurred along the radial axis to keep a single cell layer. The circular layer finally differentiated into the mestome sheath but not a vascular bundle sheath. Subsequently, a primary protoxylem vessel and phloem cells differentiated at the adaxial and abaxial sides, respectively, in contact with the circular layer (stage II, Fig. 3c). Phloem development continued even in later stages. After the primary protoxylem vessel had differentiated, one cell adjacent to the protoxylem vessel started to expand, and it differentiated into a secondary protoxylem vessel (stage III, Fig. 3d), and then two metaxylem vessels, which adjoined the circular layer, started to differentiate (stage IV, Fig. 3e). After the metaxylem development was almost completed, the ground meristem cells immediately surrounding the circular layer started expanding remarkably and differentiating into the vascular bundle sheath (Stage V, Fig. 3f). Finally, the protoxylem vessels collapsed, the position was occupied by the protoxylem lacuna, and differentiation of the large vascular bundle was completed (stage VI, Fig. 3g). Usually, between stages II and IV, procambial cells proliferated in the middle cell layer, resulting in an increase in the size of the large vascular bundles (Fig. 3c–e). A model of the differentiation process in the large vascular bundle in rice is shown in Fig. 3h.
The developmental process of the large vascular bundle in maize was almost the same as that of rice until stage IV (Fig. 4a–d), as illustrated in a model shown in Fig. 4f. In stage V, however, the circular layer in maize started to expand, and it differentiated into the vascular bundle sheath without forming any other sheath structure (Fig. 4e), whereas, in rice, the vascular bundle sheath was differentiated from the ground meristem cells and enclosed the circular layer (Fig. 3f, g). These observations suggest that the vascular bundle sheaths in rice and maize are derived from different cell lineages. Langdale et al. (1989) observed the cell lineage of the vascular bundle sheath in maize and proposed two possibilities, namely that vascular bundle sheath cells arose from procambial cells or from surrounding ground meristem cells. The results that we obtained from our observations of the developmental process of maize vascular bundles, and upon comparing them with our observations made for rice, strongly suggest that the vascular bundle sheath cells in maize arise from the procambium.
Developmental processes of small vascular bundles in rice plants
Observations of serial sections in the fourth and fifth leaf blades revealed that the developmental process of small and large vascular bundles is fundamentally the same, except for the remarkable expansion of metaxylem vessels that was observed in the large vascular bundle (Fig. 5a–f). In small vascular bundles of rice leaves, at first, the outermost cells of the procambium formed the circular layer, which eventually differentiated into the mestome sheath in a later stage (Fig. 5a). Then, the procambial cells proliferated to enlarge the size of the procambium, and simultaneously some of ground meristem cells surrounding the circular layer divided radially (Fig. 5b). The number of procambium cells continued to increase but without a significant increase in the procambium size (Fig. 5c), and then some of their descendants differentiated into a xylem vessel and phloem cells (Fig. 5d). Ground meristem cells surrounding the procambium turned into vascular bundle sheath cells (Fig. 5e). In the later stages, the small xylem vessels differentiated, instead of the two large metaxylem vessels observed in the large vascular bundle (Fig. 5e, f). There was no significant difference in structure of the small vascular bundle between rice and maize except for the presence of a mestome sheath layer in rice, which was similar to the case in the large vascular bundle (data not shown).
Development of commissural veins in rice and maize
Among the most characteristic tissues in the vascular system in monocotyledons are the commissural veins. Commissural veins are arranged at ordered intervals between two longitudinal veins that run abreast, connecting them. The transverse sectioning of the commisural vein revealed that a commissural vein in the leaf blade of rice contains a xylem cell, a phloem cell and two companion cells (Fig. 6a), which is consistent with the result obtained from the observation of longitudinal sections by Chonan et al. (1974). In order to elucidate when and where the commissural vein starts to differentiate and how it develops, we observed serial sections of vascular tissues in the base of the leaf where the commissural veins were in the process of differentiating. We mainly used rice plants because the intervals between commissural veins in rice are much narrower than those in maize, which allowed us to observe all the stages of vein cell development with serial sections.
Differentiating commissural veins were detected only in stage V (Fig. 6b, c). In this stage, as mentioned above, metaxylem vessels in large vascular bundles or xylem vessels in small vascular bundles have completed differentiation. The initiation of the commissural vein arose in a circular layer cell that was in contact with both a metaxylem vessel and one or a few phloem cells, in both large and small vascular bundles. In accordance with a previous report (Kaneko et al. 1980), small vascular bundles in fourth and fifth leaf blades of rice seedlings lacked a mestome sheath layer but instead contained larger thick-walled parenchyma cells, which had the same cell lineage as the mestome sheath cells had. The visible sign of differentiation into commissural veins was the periclinal division of the cells (Fig. 6b), which was observed only in the middle layer of the ground meristem. Judging from the observation of synchronous periclinal division, we found that, in most cases, a commissural vein was formed by continuous differentiation of ground meristem cells into procambial progenitor cells, which started from a circular layer cell in a vascular bundle and progressed toward another vascular bundle in one direction (Fig. 6b). However, in rare cases, we observed a developing commissural vein that lacked periclinal cell division in its center. (Fig. 6c). This suggests that two commissural veins might have emerged from two neighboring longitudinal veins and been connected at the center.
In maize, although it was difficult to follow the entire process of commissural vein development, the initiation of the commissural vein occurred in one of the circular cell layer, just like in rice(Fig. 6d).
On the basis of these results, we propose a model of the differentiating process of the commissural vein in rice (Fig. 7). The initiation of the commissural vein occurred at a circular layer cell that was adjacent to both the metaxylem and phloem cells, and the initiation was observed in both the large vascular bundle (Fig. 6b) and the small vascular bundle (Fig. 6c). This initiation was associated with the development of the longitudinal vascular bundle, because it occurred only at stage V, in which metaxylem cells were formed. Therefore, developing metaxylem cells, and probably phloem tissue, might produce an intercellular signal(s) that leads the circular layer cell to differentiate into a procambial progenitor cell. Starting from the newly produced progenitor cell, a commissural vein is formed by continuous differentiation of the middle layer of the ground meristem cells into progenitor cells. This differentiation occurs mostly in one direction. In rare cases, however, two newly formed lines of procambial progenitor cells meet at the center. After carrying out studies with fluorescent markers, Scarpella and colleagues suggest that auxin transport restricted by AtPIN family proteins regulates procambium formation in Arabidopsis leaves (Scarpella et al. 2006; Sawchuk et al. 2007). One-directional and bi-directional procambium formation in commissural veins of rice leaves is similar to that in loop veins or higher order veins in Arabidopsis. It is, therefore, likely that directed auxin that is derived from developing metaxylem might be the signal for the differentiation of the procambium producing the commissural vein.
In conclusion, the results of our studies showed that we could divide the developmental process of the large vascular bundles into six stages in rice and five stages in maize. We also found that the initiation of the commissural vein in rice arose in a circular layer cell that was in contact with both a metaxylem vessel and one or a few phloem cells in stage V longitudinal vascular bundles, including the large and small vascular bundles. In addition, directional differentiation of ground meristem cells into procambial progenitor cells was induced from the circular layer cell. These results suggested that cell–cell interaction was involved in differentiation into procambial progenitor cells. We also compared these results with those from maize plants and found that these differentiation processes are common in both monocotyledonous plants.
References
Aloni R (2001) Foliar and axial aspects of vascular differentiation: hypotheses and evidence. J Plant Growth Regul 20:22–34
Berleth T, Mattsson J, Hardtke CS (2000) Vascular continuity and auxin signals. Trends Plant Sci 5:387–393
Blackman E (1971) The morphology and development of cross veins in the leaves of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Ann Bot 35:653–665
Bosabalidis AM, Evert EF, Russin WA (1994) Ontogeny of the vascular bundles and contiguous tissues in the maize leaf blade. Am J Bot 81:745–752
Brown WV (1975) Variations in anatomy, associations, and origins of Kranz tissue. Am J Bot 62:395–402
Carland FM, Fujioka S, Takatsuto S, Yoshida S, Nelson T (2002) The identification of CVP1 reveals a role for sterols in vascular patterning. Plant Cell 14:2045–2058
Carland FM, Nelson T (2004) Cotyledon vascular pattern 2-mediated inositol (1, 4, 5) triphosphate signal transduction is essential for closed venation patterns of Arabidopsis foliar organs. Plant Cell 16:1263–1275
Chonan N, Kawahara H, Matsuda T (1974) Morphology of vascular bundles of leaves in gramineous crops. Jpn J Crop Sci 43:425–432
Chonan N, Kawahara H, Matsuda T (1984) Ultrastructure of vascular bundles and fundamental parenchyma in relation to movement of photosynthate in leaf sheath of rice. Jpn J Crop Sci 53:435–444
Colbert JT, Evert RF (1982) Leaf vasculature in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.). Planta 156:136–151
Crookston RK, Moss DN (1974) Interval distance for carbohydrate transport in leaves of C3 and C4 grasses. Crop Sci 14:123–125
Dannenhoffer JM, Evert RF (1994) Development of the vascular system in the leaf of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Int J Plant Sci 155:143–157
Dannenhoffer JM, Ebert W Jr, Evert RF (1990) Leaf vasculature in barley, Hordeum vulgare (Poaceae). Am J Bot 77:636–652
Dengler NG (2001) Regulation of vascular development. J Plant Growth Regul 20:1–13
Dengler NG, Dengler RE, Hattersley PW (1985) Differing ontogenetic origins of PCR (“Kranz”) sheaths in leaf blades of C4 grasses (Poaceae). Am J Bot 72:284–302
Dengler NG, Dengler RE, Hattersley PW (1986) Comparative bundle sheath and mesophyll differentiation in the leaves of the C4 grasses Panicum effusum and P . bulbosum. Am J Bot 73:1431–1442
Dengler NG, Donnelly PM, Dengler RE (1996) Differentiation of bundle sheath, mesophyll, and distinctive cells in the C4 grass Arundinella hirta. (Poaceae). Am J Bot 83:1391–1405
Dengler NG, Woodvine MA, Donnelly PM, Dengler RE (1997) Formation of vascular pattern in developing leaves of the C4 grass Arundinella hirta. Int J Plant Sci 158:1–12
Esau K (1943) Ontogeny of vascular bundle in Zea mays. Hilgardia 15:327–368
Inosaka M (1962) Studies on the development of the vascular system in the rice plant and the growth of each organ viewed from the vascular connection between them. Miyazaki Daigaku Nogakubu Kenkyu Hokoku 7:15–116
Kaneko M, Chonan N, Matsuda T (1980) Ultrastructure of the small vascular bundles and transfer pathways for photosynthate in the leaves of rice plant. Jpn J Crop Sci 49:42–50
Kaufman PB (1959) Development of the shoot of Oryza sativa L. II Leaf histogenesis. Phytomorphology 9:277–311
Klaus H (1966) Ontogenetische und histogenetische Untersuchungen an der Gerste (Hordeum Distichon L.). Bot Jahrb Syst 85:45–79
Koizumi K, Naramoto S, Sawa S, Yahara N, Ueda T, Nakano A, Sugiyama M, Fukuda H (2005) VAN3 ARF-GAP-mediated vesicle transport is involved in leaf vascular network formation. Development 132:1699–1711
Kumazawa M (1961) Studies on the vascular course in maize plant. Phytomorphology 11:128–139
Kuwabara A, Nagata T (2006) Cellular basis of developmental plasticity observed in heterophyllous leaf formation of Ludwigia arcuata (Onagraceae). Planta 224:761–770
Langdale JA, Lane B, Freeling M, Nelson T (1989) Cell lineage analysis of maize bundle sheath and mesophyll cells. Dev Biol 133:128–139
Mattsson J, Ckurshumova W, Berleth T (2003) Auxin signaling in Arabidopsis leaf vascular development. Plant Physiol 131:1327–1339
Nelson T, Dengler N (1997) Leaf vascular pattern formation. Plant Cell 9:1121–1135
Patrick JW (1972) Vascular system of the stem of the wheat plant. II. Development. Aust J Bot 20:65–78
Rueb S, Leneman M, Schilperoort RA, Hensgens LAM (1994) Efficient plant regeneration through somatic embryogenesis from callus induced on mature rice embryos (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 36:259–264
Russell SH, Evert RF (1985) Leaf vasculature in Zea mays. Planta 164:448–458
Sachs T (2000) Integrating cellular and organismic aspects of vascular differentiation. Plant Cell Physiol 41:649–656
Sawchuk MG, Head P, Donner TJ, Scarpella E (2007) Time-lapse imaging of Arabidopsis leaf development shows dynamic patterns of procambium formation. New Phytol 176:560–571
Scarpella E, Marcos D, Friml J, Berleth T (2006) Control of leaf vascular patterning by polar auxin transport. Genes Dev 20:1015–1027
Scarpella E, Rueb S, Meijer AH (2003) The RADICLELESS1 gene is required for vascular pattern formation in rice. Development 130:645–658
Sharman BC (1942) Developmental anatomy of the shoot of Zea mays L. Ann Bot 6:245–284
Sharman BC, Hitch PA (1967) Initiation of procambial strands in leaf primordial of bread wheat, Triticum aestivum L. Ann Bot 31:229–243
Sieburth LE, Muday GK, King EJ, Benton G, Kim S, Metcalf KE, Meyers L, Seamen E, Van Norman JM (2006) SCARFACE encodes an ARF-GAP that is required for normal auxin efflux and vein patterning in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 18:1396–1411
Turner S, Sieburth LE (2002) Vascular patterning. In: Somerville CR, Meyerowitz EM (eds) The Arabidopsis book. American Society of Plant Biologists, Rockville
Ueno O, Kawano Y, Wakayama M, Takeda T (2006) Leaf vascular systems in C3 and C4 grasses: a two-dimensional analysis. Ann Bot 97:611–621
Yamazaki K (1961) Studies on the connecting strand of the vascular system in rice leaves. Jpn J Crop Sci 29:400–403
Acknowledgments
This study was supported, in part, by Grants-in-Aid from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (to J.S. and H.F.), from The Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan, (to H.F.), from the Program of Basic Research Activities for Innovative Biosciences from the Bio-oriented Technology Research Advancement Institution (BRAIN) (to H.F.), and from the Twenty-first Century COE Program of the University of Tokyo (to J.S.). The authors thank Dr. Jun-ichi Itoh, Mari Obara, Dr. Yasuo Nagato and Dr. Shin-ichiro Sawa for their fruitful discussion.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sakaguchi, J., Fukuda, H. Cell differentiation in the longitudinal veins and formation of commissural veins in rice (Oryza sativa) and maize (Zea mays). J Plant Res 121, 593–602 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-008-0189-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-008-0189-1