Abstract.
Four alternative but related approaches to empirical evaluation of policy interventions are studied: social experiments, natural experiments, matching methods, and instrumental variables. In each case the necessary assumptions and the data requirements are considered for estimation of a number of key parameters of interest. These key parameters include the average treatment effect, the treatment on the treated and the local average treatment effect. Some issues of implementation and interpretation are discussed drawing on the labour market programme evaluation literature.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
JEL Classification:
J21, J64, C33
Correspondence to: Richard Blundell
This review was prepared for the special ‘microeconometrics’ PEJ. Comments from the editors, the referee and participants at the CeMMAP conference at which the papers for this volume were presented are gratefully acknowledged. The research is part of the program of the ESRC Centre for the Microeconomic Analysis of Fiscal Policy at IFS. Financial support from the ESRC is gratefully acknowledged. The second author also acknowledges the financial support from Sub-Programa Ciência e Tecnologia do Segundo Quadro Comunitário de Apoio, grant number PRAXIS XXI/BD/11413/97. The usual disclaimer applies.
About this article
Cite this article
Blundell, R., Dias, M.C. Alternative approaches to evaluation in empirical microeconomics. Portuguese Economic Journal 1, 91–115 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10258-002-0010-3
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10258-002-0010-3