Abstract
This paper outlines some of the new epistemological and ontological assumptions of contemporary technoscience thereby reframing the question of an epochal break. Important aspects are the question of a new techno-rationality, but also the constitution of a ‘New World Order Inc.’, with its new ‘politics of life itself’, the reconfiguration of categories such as race, class and gender in technoscience, as well as the amalgamation of everyday life, technoscience and culture. Given the difficulties of ‘proving’ a new episteme (or even epoch), I change perspective by reflecting on the epistemological vantage point from which the interpretation of technoscience as a new episteme or epoch becomes (im)plausible—confronting traditional approaches of philosophy and history of science and technology assessment (TA) with interventional approaches, such as postcolonial and feminist cultural studies of technoscience.
Zusammenfassung
Mein Beitrag diskutiert die Frage nach einem epochalen Bruch zwischen der wissenschaftlich-technischen Kultur der Moderne und der Technoscience bzw. einer neuen Technowissenschaftskultur. Um klassische Probleme der Epochendiskussion zu vermeiden, wird die Frage nach der Technoscience mit Hilfe des Foucaultschen Episteme- und Dispositiv-Begriffs neu gerahmt. Wichtige Aspekte der Episteme bzw. des Dispositivs Technoscience werden vorgestellt—wie die Ausbildung einer neuen Techno-Rationalität, die Konstitution einer‚New World Order Inc.’ (Haraway in Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium. FemaleManc_Meets_OncoMouse™. Feminism and technoscience. Routledge, New York, 1997: 2) und einer ‚politics of life itself’ (Franklin in Encyclopedia of bioethics, vol 3. Macmillan, New York, 1995), die Neukonfiguration zentraler Kategorien wie Geschlecht, Ethnizität oder Klasse sowie die Amalgamisierung von Alltagsleben, Technoscience und Kultur. Abschließend werden die Unterschiede der Rezeption des Technoscience-Begriffs in eher traditionellen Ansätzen der Wissenschafts- und Technikphilosophie, -soziologie und -geschichte und der Technikfolgenabschätzung mit der in eher interventionistischen Ansätzen wie postkoloniale und feministische Cultural Studies of Technoscience herausgearbeitet, um epistemologische, ontologische und politische Differenzen der Ansätze deutlich zu machen.
Résumé
En reformulant la question d’une rupture d’époque en terme d’épistémè et d’appareil, je vais souligner certaines des hypothèses épistémologiques et ontologiques de la technoscience contemporaine. Les aspects importants sont la techno-rationalité mais aussi la constitution d’une culture entrepreneuriale internationale («New World Order Inc.», Haraway in Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium. FemaleManc_Meets_OncoMouse™. Feminism and technoscience. Routledge, New York, 1997: 2), avec sa nouvelle «politique de vie elle-même» (Franklin in Encyclopedia of bioethics, vol 3. Macmillan, New York, 1995), la reconfiguration dans la technoscience de catégories telles que la race, la classe et le genre ainsi que la combinaison de la vie de tous les jours, la technoscience et la culture. Etant donné les difficultés de «prouver» une nouvelle épistémè (ou même une époque), je change de perspective en réfléchissant au point de vue épistémologique à partir duquel l’interprétation des technosciences en tant que nouvel épistémè ou époque devient plausible ou non—en confrontant les approches traditionnelles de la philosophie, de l’histoire des sciences et de l’évaluation technologique avec des approches d’intervention telles que les études culturelles postcoloniales et féministes de la technoscience.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Notes
The subtitle of Latour (1987).
I am thinking of new technologies of the self, e.g. for optimizing one’s life, such as neuro-linguistic programming or yoga, as well as genetic counselling or sex change; see also Haraway’s concept of ‘technobiopower’, Rabinow’s ‘concept of biosociality or Rose’s concept of ‘somatic individuality’.
They bring together experts from mathematics, physics, as well as biology, cognitive science, engineering, computer science, psychology, philosophy, pedagogy and other fields.
Becker and Weber (2005).
One could also talk of an ‘ethnography’ of machines.
Weber (2010).
Naturally, there are always exceptions, as found in the work of Don Ihde and Alfred Nordmann.
With the exception of some scholars working in actor-network theory and other post-constructionist approaches in STS, such as John Law or John Urry.
For example, the roboticist Thomas Christaller states that it is not possible and productive to model “the world in an objective, complete and non-contradictory way” (Christaller et al. 2001: 72).
With regard to its practices—not to its rhetorics; see above.
References
Andersen W (2002) Postcolonial technoscience. Soc Stud Sci 32:643–658
Balsamo A (1998) An Introduction, Cultural Studies, Special Issue: Cultural Studies of Science and Technology 12(3):285–299
Barnes B (1974) Scientific knowledge and sociological theory. Routledge, London
Becker B, Weber J (2005) Verkörperte Kognition und die Unbestimmtheit der Welt. Mensch-Maschine-Beziehungen in der Neueren KI. In: Gamm G, Hetzel A (eds) Unbestimmtheitssignaturen der Technik. Eine neue Deutung der technisierten Welt. Transcript 2005, Bielefeld, pp 219–232
Bloor D (1976) Knowledge and social imagery. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London
Braidotti R (2002) Metamorphoses. Towards a materialist theory of becoming. Polity Press, Cambridge
Brooks R (1986) Achieving intelligence through building robots. A.I. Memo 899, http://www.ai.mit.edu/people/brooks/papers/AIM-899.pdf, Feb 2003
Bryld M, Lykke N (2000) Cosmodolphins: feminist cultural studies of technology, animals and the sacred. Zed Books, London
Carrier M (2010) ‘Knowledge is power’, or how to capture the relations between science and technoscience. In: Nordmann A, Radder H, Schiemann G (eds) Science and its recent history: epochal break or business as usual? University Press of Chicago, Chicago (forthcoming)
Christaller T, Decker M, Gilsbach J-M, Hirzinger G, Schweighofer E, Schweitzer G, Sturma D, Lauterbach K (2001) Robotik. Perspektiven für menschliches Handeln in der zukünftigen Gesellschaft. Springer, Berlin
Collingridge D (1981) The social control of technology. The Open University Press, Milton Keynes
Deleuze G (1992/1990) Postscript on the societies of control, _OCTOBER_ 59, Winter 1992. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 3–7. ftp://www.etext.archive.umich.edu/pub/Politics/Spunk/anarchy_texts/misc/Spunk962.txt (first published in L’Autre Journal 1, May 1990)
Etzkowitz H, Leydesdorff L (eds) (1997) Universities in the global knowledge economy: a co-evolution of university–industry–government relations. Cassell Academic, London
Feeley M, Simon J (1992) The new penology: notes on the emerging strategy of corrections and its implications. Criminology 30:449–474
Forman P (2007) The primacy of science in modernity, of technology in postmodernity, and of ideology in the history of technology. Hist Technol 23(1):1–152
Foucault M (1972) The archeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. Harper Row, New York
Foucault M (1980) Power/knowledge. Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977. In: Gordon C. (ed). Harvester, London
Franklin S (1995) Life. In: Reich WT (ed) Encyclopedia of bioethics, vol 3. Macmillan, New York
Funtowiecz S, Ravetz J (1993) The emergence of post-normal science. In: von Schomberg R (ed) Science, politics, morality. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P, Trow M (1994) The new production of knowledge. The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage, London
Goven J (2002) Citizens and deficits: problematic paths toward participatory technology assessment. In: Karner S, Wieser B (eds) Conference proceedings of the international summer academy on technology studies: technology and the public, pp 75–84. Graz, Austria at IFF/IFZ, http://www.ifz.tugraz.at/index_en.php/filemanager/download/125/goven.pdf, 26 Dec 2009
Hacking I (1983) Representing and intervening. Introductory topics in the philosophy of natural science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Haraway D (1985/1991) A cyborg manifesto: science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. In: Haraway D (ed) Simians, cyborgs and women: the reinvention of nature. Routledge, New York, pp 149–181 (first published in: Socialist Review 80, 1985, 65–108
Haraway D (1994) A game of cat’s cradle: science studies, feminist theory, cultural studies. Configurations 2.1:59–71
Haraway D (1997) Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium. FemaleManc_Meets_OncoMouse™. Feminism and technoscience. Routledge, New York
Haraway D (2004/1992) Otherworldly conversations; terran topics; local terms. In: Haraway D (ed) The Haraway reader. Routledge, London, pp 125–150
Hayles NK (2003) Computing the human. In: Weber J, Bath C (eds) Turbulente Körper, soziale Maschinen, Feministische Studien zur Wissenschaftskultur. Leske & Budrich, Opladen
Heylighen F, Joslyn C (2001). Cybernetics and second-order cybernetics. http://www.lampsacus.com/documents/CyberneticsSecondOrder.pdf. Last accessed 6 Jan 2010 (first published in: Meyers RA (ed) Encyclopedia of physical science & technology, 3rd edn. Academic Press, New York)
Husbands P, Meyer J-A (eds) (1998) Evolutionary robotics. First European workshop, EvoRobot98, Paris, France, 16–17 April 1998, Proceedings. Springer, Berlin pp 1–21
Kogge W (2008) Technologie des 21. Jahrhunderts. Perspektiven der Technikphilosophie. DZPh Berlin 56(6):935–956
Kuhn T (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Latour B (1987) Science in action. Open University Press, Milton Keynes
Latour B (1993) We have never been modern (tr. by Catherine Porter). Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Lykke N (2008) Feminist cultural studies of technoscience: portrait of an implosion. In: Smelik A, Lykke N (eds) Bits of life. Feminism at the intersections of media, bioscience, and technology. University of Washington Press, Washington, DC, pp 3–15
MacKenzie D (1981) Statistics in Britain. 1865–1930. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh
McNeil M, Franklin S (1991) Science and technology: questions for cultural studies and feminism. In: Franklin S, Lury C, Stacey J (eds) Off-centre. Feminism and cultural studies. HarperCollins, London, pp 129–146
Newell A, Simon H (1976) Computer science as empirical inquiry: symbols and search. Commun ACM 19:113–126
Nolfi S, Floreano D (2000) Evolutionary robotics. The biology, intelligence, and technology of self-organizing machines. Intelligent robots and autonomous agents. MIT Press, Cambridge
Nordmann A (2004) Was ist TechnoWissenschaft?—Zum Wandel der Wissenschaftskultur am Beispiel von Nanoforschung u. Bionik. In: Rossmann T, Tropea C (eds) Bionik–Neue Forschungsergebnisse aus Natur-, Ingenieur-u. Geisteswissenschaften. Springer, Berlin
Nordmann A (2009) Technikfolgenabschätzung als Technowissenschaft an der Schnittstelle von Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft. Vortrag auf der 9. Österr. TA-Konferenz “Wann TA? Technikfolgenabschätzung im Zeitalter der Technowissenschaften”. Österreichisches Institut für Technikfolgenabschätzung, Wien, 8. Juni 2009
Nordmann A (2010) The age of technoscience. In: Nordmann A, Radder H, Schiemann G (eds) Science and its recent history: epochal break or business as usual? University Press of Chicago, Chicago (forthcoming)
Pfeifer R, Ch Scheier (1999) Understanding intelligence. MIT Press, Cambridge
Pickering A (2002) Cybernetics and the mangle: Ashby, Beer and Pask. Soc Stud Sci 32(3):413–437
Popper K (1934/1959) The logic of scientific discovery. Hutchinson, London (in German: Julius Springer, Vienna 1934)
Reinel B (1999) Reflections on cultural studies of technoscience. Eur J Cult Stud 2(2):163–189
Rheinberger H-J (2007) Historische Epistemologie. Junius, Hamburg
Rose N (2001) The politics of life itself. Theory Cult Soc 18(6):1–30
Rose N (2007) The politics of life itself. Biomedicine, power and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton University Press, New Jersey
Schaper-Rinkel P (2010) Trans-Disziplinierung? Kritische Anmerkungen zu Transdisziplinarität am Beispiel von Nanotechnologie und Neuroforschung. In: Weber J (ed) Interdiziplinierung? Über den Wissenstransfer zwischen den Geistes-, Sozial- und Technowissenschaften. Transcript, Bielefeld (forthcoming)
Schiemann G (2010) We are not witnessing a new scientific revolution. In: Nordmann A, Radder H, Schiemann G (eds) Science and its recent history: epochal break or business as usual? University Press of Chicago, Chicago (forthcoming)
Shapin S (1982) History of science and its sociological reconstructions. Hist Sci 20:157–211
Star SL (1991) Power, technology and the phenomenology of conventions on being allergic to onions. In: Law J (ed) A sociology of monsters. Essays on power, technology and domination. Routledge, London, pp 26–56
Suchman L (2003) Agencies in technology design: feminist reconfigurations. Centre of Science Studies, Lancaster University, Lancaster, http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/papers/agenciestechnodesign.pdf, Oct 2005
Verran H (2002) A postcolonial moment in science studies: alternative firing regimes of environmental scientists and aboriginal landowners. Soc Stud Sci 32:729–762
Weber J (2003) Umkämpfte Bedeutungen: Naturkonzepte im Zeitalter der Technoscience. Campus, Frankfurt
Weber J (2005) Helpless machines and true loving caregivers. A feminist critique of recent trends in human–robot interaction. J Inf Commun Ethics Soc 3(4/6):209–218
Weber J (2006) From science and technology to feminist technoscience. In: Davis K, Evans E, Lorber J (eds) Handbook of gender and women’s studies. Sage, London, pp 397–414
Weber J (2010) Blackboxing organisms, exploiting the unpredictable. On the (re-)configuration of technoscientific rationality in human–machine communication. In: Carrier M, Nordmann A (eds) Science in the context of application. Springer, Berlin (forthcoming)
Winner L (1989/1986) The whale and the reactor. A search for limits in an age of high technology, 1st edn. Chicago University Press, Chicago
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weber, J. Making worlds: epistemological, ontological and political dimensions of technoscience. Poiesis Prax 7, 17–36 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10202-010-0076-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10202-010-0076-4