Abstract
Background
Several techniques are available for the surgical treatment of rectovaginal fistulas, however often the results are rather disappointing. Interposition of healthy, well vascularized tissue may be the key to rectovaginal fistula healing. The present study was aimed at evaluating the outcome of puborectal sling interposition in the treatment of rectovaginal fistulas.
Methods
Between 2001 and 2004, 26 consecutive patients (median age, 40.5 years; range, 15–69 years) with a rectovaginal fistula underwent a puborectal sling interposition. The etiology of the fistulas was: obstetric injury (n=11), complications after prior surgery (n=2), bartholinitis (n=4), cryptoglandular perineal abscess (n=2), inflammatory bowel disease (n=2) and idiopathic causes (n=5). The patients received a questionnaire about fecal continence (before and after surgery) and dyspareunia (after surgery).
Results
The median follow-up was 14 months. The recto-vaginal fistula healed in 16 (62%) of 26 patients. In patients who had undergone one or more previous repairs, the healing rate was only 31% versus 92% in patients without previous repairs (p<0.01). The median Rockwood fecal incontinence severity index score did not change as a result of the surgery. Seventeen percent of patients experienced painful intercourse before the operation; after the procedure this problem was encountered by 57% of the patients.
Conclusions
The puborectal sling interposition is only successful in patients without previous repairs and in those with an uneventful postoperative course, however dyspareunia is a major drawback of this procedure.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oom, D.M.J., Gosselink, M.P., Van Dijl, V.R.M. et al. Puborectal sling interposition for the treatment of rectovaginal fistulas. Tech Coloproctol 10, 125–130 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-006-0265-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-006-0265-2