Abstract
Salinity severely affects plant growth and development. Plants evolved various mechanisms to cope up stress both at molecular and cellular levels. Halophytes have developed better mechanism to alleviate the salt stress than glycophytes, and therefore, it is advantageous to study the role of different genes from halophytes. Salicornia brachiata is an extreme halophyte, which grows luxuriantly in the salty marshes in the coastal areas. Earlier, we have isolated SbASR-1 (abscisic acid stress ripening-1) gene from S. brachiata using cDNA subtractive hybridisation library. ASR-1 genes are abscisic acid (ABA) responsive, whose expression level increases under abiotic stresses, injury, during fruit ripening and in pollen grains. The SbASR-1 transcript showed up-regulation under salt stress conditions. The SbASR-1 protein contains 202 amino acids of 21.01-kDa molecular mass and has 79 amino acid long signatures of ABA/WDS gene family. It has a maximum identity (73 %) with Solanum chilense ASR-1 protein. The SbASR-1 has a large number of disorder-promoting amino acids, which make it an intrinsically disordered protein. The SbASR-1 gene was over-expressed under CaMV 35S promoter in tobacco plant to study its physiological functions under salt stress. T0 transgenic tobacco seeds showed better germination and seedling growth as compared to wild type (Wt) in a salt stress condition. In the leaf tissues of transgenic lines, Na+ and proline contents were significantly lower, as compared to Wt plant, under salt treatment, suggesting that transgenic plants are better adapted to salt stress.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Among the different abiotic stresses, salinity is the major cause, reducing agricultural yield in salt-affected areas. Salinity is defined as the presence of a high concentration of dissolved salts in soil. NaCl constitutes a major portion of these salts and is highly toxic to plants. Soil salinity is caused by various factors like amount of evaporation, precipitation, weathering of rocks and uneven irrigation (Mahajan and Tuteja 2005). It leads to ionic (Na+, Cl− and SO 2−4 ), osmotic and oxidative stress conditions in glycophytes (Zhu 2002), whereas halophytes grow naturally in salt-affected areas and have developed efficient protective mechanism against salinity.
Salicornia brachiata Roxb (Amaranthaceae) is a leafless succulent annual halophyte and commonly grows in coastal marshes in India. Salicornia can grow in a wide range of salt concentrations (0.1–2.0 M) and can accumulate quantities of salt as high as 40 % of its dry weight. This unique characteristic provides an advantage to study the salt tolerance mechanisms. We have earlier developed an expressed sequence tag (EST) database of S. brachiata using cDNA subtractive hybridisation (Jha et al. 2009). The detailed functional analysis is being carried out for some important stress-related genes from EST database and others like MAPK (Agarwal et al. 2010a), NHX-1 (Jha et al. 2011a), GSTU (Jha et al. 2011b), SOS-1, pAPX and transcription factors like DREB (Gupta et al. 2010).
Abscisic acid stress ripening-1 (ASR-1) is a stress- and developmentally regulated gene found only in plant genome. This gene was first reported from tomato (Iusem et al. 1993). Since then, multiple homologues of ASR-1 gene from many plant species (Carrari et al. 2004) except Arabidopsis (Yang et al. 2005) were reported. The ASR gene expression was reported to be induced by abscisic acid (ABA), salt, drought, cold and injury, during fruit ripening and also by biotic factors (Amitai-Zeigerson et al. 1995; Liu et al. 2010). The ASR proteins are hydrophilic in nature possessing a high content of charged residue such as His, Lys and Glu (Iusem et al. 1993; Amitai-Zeigerson et al. 1995) and do not have any N-terminal hydrophilic repeat sequence as specific in late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins (Maskin et al. 2001). Maskin et al. (2007) showed that tomato ASR-1 accumulates as LEA proteins at late stage of seed development. C-terminal end of LLA23 (a lily ASR protein) contains Lys (K)-rich motifs, characteristic of nuclear localising signal (NLS) and is conserved in other plant ASR proteins (Wang et al. 2005). ASR family protein works as a transcription factor and regulates hexose transporters and ABA-responsive genes (Frankel et al. 2007). Konrad and Bar-Zvi (2008) have shown that tomato ASR-1 is found in unstructured form in the cytosol and protects cytosolic proteins under abiotic stress conditions. Tomato ASR-1 protein gets dimerised to structured form in the presence of Zn, and this form is abundant in the nucleus (Goldgur et al. 2007). Several transgenic plants over-expressing ASR genes have been developed. Over-expression of lily ASR (LLA23) in Arabidopsis (Yang et al. 2005) and tomato ASR-1 in tobacco (Kalifa et al. 2004) conferred enhanced salt and drought tolerance in transgenic lines. The over-expression of MpASR gene in Arabidopsis exhibited enhanced osmotic tolerance (Dai et al. 2011).
There are several reports on isolation and characterisation of ASR-1 gene from different glycophytes; however, this gene has not been characterized from any halophytes so far. Halophytes have a unique genetic make-up with well-developed adaptation mechanism to survive in a saline condition. With this aim, we have isolated and characterised the SbASR-1 gene from an extreme halophyte S. brachiata. T1 transgenic tobacco lines were screened for functional validation of this gene under salt stress condition.
Material and Methods
In Silico Analysis
The ASR-1 gene and protein sequences of different plants were obtained from National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). The phylogenetic tree of the amino acid sequences was constructed using MEGA5 software (Tamura et al. 2011) with the maximum likelihood method and 1,000 replicates. Indication of conserved domains of SbASR-1 was carried out by query against InterPro (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/pfa/iprscan/). Secondary structure prediction was carried out by ExPASy tools (http://www.expasy.ch/tools/). Folding characteristic of SbASR-1 protein was predicted by FoldIndex program (Prilusky et al. 2005, http://bioportal.weizmann.ac.il/fldbin/findex). Primary SbASR-1 protein sequence and other glycophtic ASR-1 sequences were analysed for N-glycosylation sites, protein kinase sites and myristoylation sites by PROSCAN.BASE (http://npsa-pbil.ibcp.fr), whereas total phosphorylation site search was performed by Net Phos2.0 server (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetPhos/). Physicochemical parameters of SbASR-1 protein were studied by ProtParam (ExPASy tools).
Construction of Plant Transformation Vector and Tobacco Transformation
The SbASR-1 cDNA was PCR amplified using forward (ASR1F: 5′-GGCTCGAGATGGAAACAGGAGGCTATGGTTCAACCG-3′) and reverse (ASR1R: 5′- GGGAATTCTTAGAAGAAATGGTGCTTCTTTTCC-3′) primers containing XhoI and EcoRI sites, respectively. The amplicon was digested with XhoI/EcoRI and cloned into pRT 101 vector (Töpfer et al. 1987). Thereafter, the entire cassette containing CaMV 35S-SbASR-1 gene and terminator was digested with PstI and cloned into the pCAMBIA 1301 vector at the PstI site. The resulting vector was mobilised into Agrobacterium tumefaciens (LBA 4404) and further transformed to tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum cv. xanthii) plants according to the standard protocol (Horsch et al. 1985).
Confirmation of Transgene in Tobacco Plants
Genomic DNA of tobacco transgenic lines was extracted from leaf tissues using modified cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method as described by Bubner et al. (2004). Leaf tissues (2 g) were powdered with mortar and pestle in liquid nitrogen and homogenised in 4 ml hot (65 °C) extraction buffer (2 % CTAB w/v, 100 mM Tris pH 8.0, 20 mM EDTA pH 8.0, 1.4 M NaCl, 1 % PVP M r 40,000, 1 % β-mercaptoethanol). Further, 5 ml of chloroform/isoamyl alcohol (CI 24:1) was added, mixed and centrifuged; the supernatant was again mixed with 1 ml of 5 % CTAB (w/v in 0.35 M NaCl) buffer and extracted with 5 ml CI and centrifuged. The nucleic acid was precipitated from the supernatant by 2/3 volume of ice-cold isopropanol. RNA was removed by rehydrating pellets in 500 μl high salt TE buffer including RNAse (10 mM Tris pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA pH 8.0, 1 M NaCl, 100 ng/μl RNAse) at 37 °C for 15 min. Further, the DNA was purified by CI extraction and precipitated by using 2× ice-cold absolute ethanol. The DNA pellet was washed with 80 % ethanol, dissolved in sterile double-distilled water and stored at −20 °C. Genomic DNA concentration was determined by NanoDrop Spectrophotometer (ND1000, Wilmington, USA) and diluted to 1, 10 and 100 ng/μl concentration. Real-time quantitative (RTQ) PCR condition was optimised for GUS gene primers (GQF: 5′-GTGAAGGGCCAACAGTTCC-3′, GQR: 5′-GGTAATGCGAGGTACGGTA-3′) and NRA gene (NCBI accession no. X06134) primers (NRAF: 5′-AATGCTGGCACTGATTGCAC-3′, NRAR: 5′-TCCTCTGCGCTGGAACAAG-3′) (NRA as an internal control, Guo et al. 2010). The PCR reactions were carried out using 3.75 ng GUS primer or 7.5 ng NRA primers in 20-μl reaction using QuantiFast SYBR Green PCR reaction kit (Qiagen, USA). The following PCR conditions were maintained for RTQ: 95 °C for 5 min, 1 cycle and 95 °C for 1 min, 55 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s, 45 cycles. At the end of the PCR cycles, the products were put through a melt curve analysis. The amplified product was run on a 1.5 % agarose gel to confirm expected size. The experiments were repeated twice independently. Reactions were run in Real-Time iQ5 Cycler (Bio-Rad, USA), and standard curves were plotted using threshold cycle (Ct) value to determine reaction efficiencies. The efficiency values were put in the following formula given by Shepherd et al. (2009) to determine the copy number ratio of GUS to NRA:
Transcript Expression of SbASR-1 Gene in Transgenic Lines
Total RNA was isolated from leaf tissues using the GITC method (Chomczynski and Sacchi 1987). The cDNA from both wild-type (Wt) and transgenic plants was prepared according to manufacturer's protocol (Promega, USA). The reverse transcriptase PCR was carried out using 500 ng cDNA, 150 ng ASR-1 primers (ASRQF3 5′-CCGAGACCAAGAGGTATGG-3′, ASRQR3 5′-GAGGCAACAGCACCAAGA-3′) or 150 ng actin primers (QACTF 5′- CGTTTGGATCTTGCTGGTCGT-3′, QACTR 5′-CAGCAATGCCAGGGAACATAG-3′), 200 μM dNTPs and 2.5 U Taq DNA polymerase in a 50-μl reaction with the following conditions: 95 °C for 5 min, 1 cycle; 95 °C for 1 min, 60 °C for 1 min, 72 °C for 1 min, 35 cycles; 72 °C for 7 min, 1 cycle. The PCR products were analysed via agarose gel electrophoresis.
Germination Assay and Growth Parameter Analysis
To test the stability of the transgene, the seeds from T0 transgenic plants were germinated on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with hygromycin (20 mg/l). For analysis of salt stress tolerance of SbASR-1 over-expressing tobacco plants, seeds of two transgenic lines and Wt were germinated on MS medium (Murashige and Skoog 1962) supplemented with 0, 100, 150, 200 and 300 mM NaCl. Percent seed germination, root length, fresh seedlings' weight and leaf areas were scored after 30 days of growth. To study the growth for longer duration, the seeds were first germinated on the MS basal medium, and after 1 week of germination, the T1 seedlings were transferred in jars on the MS basal medium or supplemented with 200 mM NaCl. In parallel, 6-week-old plants after germination were transferred to sterile soil in small plastic cups. After 2 weeks of acclimatisation, plants were treated with 10 ml of 400 mM NaCl every alternate day for 2 weeks.
Ion Contents
For analysis of ion content, 0.2 g of tissues from second leaf from the top of a 4-week-old plant grown in hydroponic medium (1/2 MS with or without 100 mM NaCl) was digested with 4 ml perchloric acid and nitric acid solution (3:1). The solution was dried on the hot plate and further diluted to 25 ml with deionised water and filtered through 0.2-μm filter. Ion content was measured by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer (Optima 2000DV, PerkinElmer, Germany).
Electrolyte Leakage and Membrane Stability Index
Electrolyte leakage was measured according to Lutts et al. (1996). Leaf discs of same size were collected from three plants for each treatment and washed thoroughly with deionised water to remove surface-adhered electrolytes. The samples were placed in closed vials containing 10 ml of deionised water and were then incubated at 25 °C on a rotary shaker for 24 h. Subsequently, the electrical conductivity (EC) of the solution (L t) was determined using Seven Easy conductivity meter (Mettler Toledo AG 8603, Switzerland). The samples were then autoclaved at 120 °C for 20 min and cooled at 25 °C before determining the final electrical conductivity (L 0). The electrolyte leakage was defined as follows:
Membrane stability index (MSI) of Wt and transgenic lines was determined as described by Sairam (1994); 200 mg young leaves of stress-treated plants was taken in 10 ml double-distilled water in duplicate. One set was incubated in a water bath at 40 °C for 30 min, and EC (L 1) was recorded by a conductivity meter. The second set was boiled on the water bath for 10 min at 100 °C, and again, EC (L 2) was recorded after cooling. Finally, the MSI was calculated using the formula below:
Water Content
Total percent water content (PWC) in the leaves of stress-treated and untreated plants was estimated as described by Zhang and Blumwald (2001). Fresh weight (FW) of leaf discs of 6 cm2 was recorded, wrapped in aluminium foil and dried at 70 °C for 48 h. The dry weight (DW) of discs was recorded, and PWC was calculated according to the following formula:
Chlorophyll Content
Leaf chlorophyll content of the 4-week-old transgenic and Wt plants, grown under different salt concentration, was estimated according to Arnon (1949). Leaf tissues were homogenised in 80 % acetone and were then incubated in the dark for 6 h, and absorbance of the supernatant was recorded at 645 and 663 nm in T80+ UV-Vis Spectrophotometer (PG Instrument Ltd., UK) to calculate total chlorophyll amount.
Proline Content
Free proline content in the leaves was determined using ninhydrin (Bates et al. 1973) with minor modifications. Leaf tissues (100 mg) were homogenised in 1.2 ml of 3 % aqueous sulphosalicylic acid and centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 10 min. After centrifugation, 500 μl of supernatant was diluted to 1 ml with distilled water, reacted with 1 ml of 2 % ninhydrin and incubated at 90 °C for 1 h. The samples were cooled on ice, and 2 ml of toluene was added, vortexed and allowed to settle for 2 min. Upper phase was aliquoted to read the absorbance at 520 nm in T80+ UV-Vis Spectrophotometer (PG Instrument Ltd., UK). The proline content was calculated against a standard curve drawn from known concentration of l-proline (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and expressed as microgrammmes per gram of fresh weight.
Statistical Analysis
Each experiment was carried out in three replicates. The two-factor ANOVA with replication on Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA) was carried out. The critical difference values (C.D.) were calculated at the p = 0.05 level to find out the significant differences between the means of Wt and transgenic lines with or without salt treatment by the following formula:
Significantly different mean values are indicated by different letters on the graphs.
Result and Discussion
In Silico Analysis
The SbASR-1 (accession number EU746399) was 938 bp long-containing 106 bp 5′ UTR, 609 bp open reading frame and 223 bp 3′ UTR regions. The SbASR-1 gene encoded a polypeptide of 202 amino acid residues (Fig. 1a) with an estimated molecular mass of 21.01 kDa having an isoelectric point of 5.30. Analysis of SbASR-1 protein sequence by query against InterPro revealed the presence of a characteristic ABA/WDS signature sequence of 79 amino acid residues (Fig. 1a). The SbASR-1 amino acid sequence showed maximum identity (73 %) with Solanum chilense ASR-1. To study the evolutionary relationship, phylogenetic tree of amino acid sequences of SbASR-1 and other plant ASR-1 proteins was constructed by the maximum likelihood method (Supplementary Fig. 1). The phylogenetic tree revealed that SbASR-1 is closer to other Solanaceae members. Total amino acids' alignment of SbASR-1 with other 22 ASR-1 proteins from glycophytic plants was carried out by ClustalW program. Comparative analysis of different motifs (Virlouvet et al. 2011) and sites of SbASR-1 and other glycophytic ASR-1 was carried out using an online server (Supplementary Table 1). The N-terminal His-rich region (motif A) was found in all glycophytic ASR-1, whereas in SbASR-1, it is dominated by glycine residues (Supplementary Fig. 2). The C-terminal region revealed three conserved domains, viz. Zn2+-dependent DNA-binding domain (motif B), hydrophobic residue-rich DNA-binding hindering domain (motif C) and NLS (motifs D and E, Supplementary Fig. 2). Most of the ASR proteins have K- or R-rich bipartite NLS on the C-terminal end (Wang et al. 2005). Similarly, C-terminal end of the SbASR-1 protein also contains conserved bipartite K-rich NLS (Supplementary Fig. 2).The LLA23 protein has K-rich NLS, and it was found to be distributed in the nucleus and cytosol of the vegetative cells of mature pollen grain (Wang et al. 2005). VvMSA (Grape ASR protein) was localised in the nucleus and interacted with the VvHT1 promoter (Cakir et al. 2003). However, it was observed that ASR-1 proteins from Solanaceae family have monopartite NLS (Supplementary Fig. 2). The secondary structure of SbASR-1 was predicted using the PSIPRED protein structure prediction server (ExPASy tools) and revealed the presence of five coils and four alpha-helices (Supplementary Fig. 3). Approximately, 30 % of all eukaryotic proteins are either completely or partially disordered (Fink 2005). The intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) protect other cellular proteins under stress conditions and help in transcriptional regulation of other genes. It can undergo extensive post-translational modifications, such as phosphorylation, acetylation, ubiquitination, sumoylation, etc., allowing easier protein–protein interaction for modulation of biological functions because of their structural flexibility (Uversky and Dunker 2010). Folding prediction of SbASR-1 protein using FoldIndex program revealed 66.3 % disorder-promoting amino acid residues (Fig. 1b, c). Similarly, in tomato, the ASR-1 protein contained higher percentage of disorder-promoting amino acid residues (Goldgur et al. 2007). Uversky et al. (2000) reported that the natively unfolded protein or IDPs had generally low M rs with less than 150 amino acid residues and showed either acidic or basic isoelectric pH. The SbASR-1 protein exhibited an acidic isoelectric pH (5.3) compared to almost neutral isoelectric pH of tomato ASR protein confirming that SbASR-1 is also an IDP.
The PROSCAN.BASE search revealed 29 N-myristoylation sites, 3 tyrosine kinase phosphorylation sites, 2 protein kinase C phosphorylation sites and 1 N-glycosylation site in SbASR-1 protein (Supplementary Tables 1 and 2), whereas in other glycophytic plant ASR-1 proteins, few N-myristoylation sites were found. The myristoylation occurs by covalent attachment of myristate group at the N-terminal glycine residue of eukaryotes and viruses (Farazi et al. 2001). Myristoylation of protein helps in protein–protein interaction and in regulating signalling pathways during apoptosis and salt stress adaptation (de Jonge et al. 2000). Ishitani et al. (2000) reported that mutation in myristoylation sites makes plants hypersensitive to salt stress. Therefore, it is possible that the presence of glycine-rich region in the SbASR-1 may help in salt adaptation. The overall phosphorylation site search analysis by NetPhos 2.0 server exhibited seven, two and five serine, threonine and tyrosine phosphorylation sites, respectively. It has one N-glycosylation site, which is found only in few glycophytic species. In Arabidopsis, it was reported that one isoform of glycosylating enzyme STT3A is involved in salt/osmotic stress-adapted mechanism (Koiwa et al. 2003)
Analysis of Transgenic Lines
ASR protein developmentally regulates fruit ripening and is also expressed in salt and drought conditions. Earlier, we have reported that SbASR-1 was consitutively expressed and reached to a maximum level at 250 mM NaCl. Time course analysis with 250 mM NaCl revealed that SbASR-1 transcript peaks at 12 h (Jha et al. 2009). In the present study, SbASR-1 gene was cloned into plant expression vector pCAMBIA 1301 (Fig. 2a), and transgenic tobacco was developed for functional validation. Transgenic plants were confirmed by PCR (Fig. 2b) and GUS staining (Fig. 2c). RTQ-PCR was done to determine the transgene integration and the copy number using NRA gene as the internal control (Guo et al. 2010). RTQ analysis revealed that L3 and L13 have GUS to NRA ratios close to 1, and therefore, it is highly likely that these lines have double insertion. The transgenic line, L15 with a ratio close to 0.5 probably showed a single-copy insertion (Fig. 2d). Transgenic lines showed high expression of the SbASR-1 gene by RT-PCR, whereas it was absent in the Wt plant (Fig. 2e)
The seeds from T0 transgenic lines L3 and L15 were germinated on the MS basal medium supplemented with 0, 100, 150, 200 and 300 mM NaCl. The percentage of seed germination decreased with increasing NaCl concentration in both Wt and transgenic lines; however, the germination was affected severely in Wt plants (Fig. 3a). Over-expression of peroxidase TPX2 in tobacco increased the germination rate of transgenic lines suffering from osmotic stress (Amaya et al. 1999). The peroxidase gene is reported from cDNA library prepared through suppressive subtractive hybridisation experiment of Wt and transgenic tobacco line over-expressing tomato ASR-1. It was also observed that expression of seed imbibition protein homologue is higher in tobacco transgenic line compared to Wt (Kalifa et al. 2004). Therefore, it is expected that the relative increase in germination rate of the transgenic lines under salt stress in our experiments may be due to increased expression of these proteins. At 0 mM NaCl, the Wt and transgenic lines showed similar morphological features (Figs. 3a–d and 4a); however, at 100 mM and higher concentration of NaCl, the seedling growth was better in transgenic lines. The root length was significantly reduced at 100 to 200 mM NaCl (Figs. 3b and 4b–d). The seeds were germinated on the MS basal medium, and the seedlings were transferred on the MS basal medium with or without 200 mM NaCl. The transgenic lines showed better shoot and root growth after 4 weeks in the presence of salt (Fig. 4e–g). Wt plants showed very poor root growth in 200 mM NaCl, whereas transgenic lines exhibited denser and healthier roots (Fig. 4h–j). The transgenic plants, grown in small plastic pots, treated with 400 mM NaCl every alternate day for 2 weeks showed less wilting compared to Wt plants (Fig. 4k, l). Similarly, the leaf area and seedling weight were found significantly higher in transgenic lines at higher NaCl concentration compared to Wt plants (Fig. 3c, d). The increase in root length of the transgenic lines compared to Wt may be due to increased water uptake to overcome the secondary osmotic stress condition induced by salt (Agarwal et al. 2010b). Chlorophyll is considered as one of the markers of cellular stress, and the decrease in chlorophyll is considered as a common symptom under salt stress. Chlorophyll content was significantly reduced in Wt as compared to transgenic plants at different NaCl concentrations (Fig. 3e). The reduced chlorophyll accumulation during salt treatment may be due to the interference of different chlorophyll biosynthesis stages in Wt plants.
Cell membrane stability is affected in response to abiotic stress in sensitive plants leading to increased electrolyte leakage. Electrolyte leakage is used to measure the membrane permeability of the cell. Salt stress causes damage to plant cell membrane, thereby increasing the electrolyte permeability (Shukla et al. 2011). Therefore, maintenance of membrane stability and integrity is quite important in preventing the harsh effect of stress (Levitt 1980). In the present study, the MSI was significantly higher in the transgenic lines as compared to Wt plants (Fig. 3f). The L15 line showed better membrane stability compared to L3. The electrolyte leakage was approximately 40 % in Wt and transgenic lines at 0 mM NaCl and significantly increased by increasing NaCl concentration (Fig. 3g). However, the electrolyte leakage was higher in Wt plants. Transgenic Arabidopsis over-expressing MpAsr showed less leakage and peroxidation under salt and osmotic stress conditions (Dai et al. 2011). MSI of 35 S-TaABC1 transgenic plants under osmotic stress was found to be higher than that of Wt and vector control plants (Wang et al. 2011). The MSI was found higher when transgenic 35 S::NtOsmotin was compared with non-transgenic, whereas electrolyte leakage assay showed a reverse result (Das et al. 2011). Better membrane stability was also observed in cotton and strawberry plants transformed with Osmotin gene (Husaini and Abdin 2008; Parkhi et al. 2009). Higher membrane stability and lower electrolyte leakage had been reported in transgenic plants in mulberry using the HVA1 gene (Lal et al. 2008) under simulated drought and salt conditions. In SbASR-1 transgenic lines, PWC was higher in the L15 line compared to Wt and L3 at different NaCl concentrations. The L15 line also showed higher MSI, which is well correlated with its high PWC (Fig. 3f, h).
Proline and total soluble sugars are very important biochemical indicators of salinity tolerance in plants (Ashraf and Harris 2004). When plants face salt stress, proline accumulates in the cytosol and helps substantially in cytoplasmic osmotic adjustment (Leigh et al. 1981). It helps the plant cell by stabilising sub-cellular structures such as membranes and proteins, scavenging free radicals and buffering cellular redox potential under salt stress (Ashraf and Foolad 2007). In the present study, transgenic lines showed lower proline content up to 200 mM NaCl (Fig. 3i).This suggests that transgenic plants do not face much salt stress; therefore, the proline remains low in these plants as compared to Wt. Similarly, the tomato ASR-1 gene in transgenic tobacco showed less proline accumulation as compared to Wt (Kalifa et al. 2004).
The regulation of ions is an indispensable component of growth and adaptation. In plants, the balance of Na+ and K+ is important for salt tolerance. Since the leaves serve as a sink for the toxic ions under salt stress, ion (Na+ and K+) content analysis was carried out in the leaves of Wt and transgenic plants. The SbASR-1 transgenic lines showed significantly less Na+ accumulation in L3 and L15 lines than Wt plants (Fig. 5a). Salinity also impedes the ratio of K+ and Na+ in the cell. However, an increase in K+ concentration can alleviate the deleterious effect of salinity on growth and yield (Giri et al. 2007). In the present study, we observed that K+ accumulation was decreased in L3 and L15 lines, compared to Wt plants (Fig. 5b). However, the ratio of K+/Na+ was higher in the transgenic lines under salt stress (Fig. 5c). Similarly, Kalifa et al. (2004) reported less accumulation of Na+ and K+ in the SlASR-1 over-expressed tobacco transgenic line.
In conclusion, it can be explained that halophytes have efficient mechanisms to cope with high salt stress by regulating different transcription factor and salt-tolerant genes. The SbASR-1 amino acid showed N-terminal glycine-rich region, maximum number of myristoylation sites and higher ratio of disorder promoting amino acids as compared to glycophytic ASR-1 proteins. The SbASR-1 gene showed significant salt tolerance in transgenic tobacco. The transgenic plants exhibited better growth, low proline content and lower amount of Na+ and K+ content under salt stress. This study reveals that SbASR-1 gene is a potential candidate for imparting abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants.
References
Agarwal PK, Gupta K, Jha B (2010a) Molecular characterization of the Salicornia brachiata SbMAPKK gene and its expression by abiotic stress. Mol Biol Rep 37:981–986
Agarwal P, Agarwal PK, Joshi AJ, Sopory SK, Reddy MK (2010b) Overexpression of PgDREB2A transcription factor enhances abiotic stress tolerance and activates downstream stress-responsive genes. Mol Biol Rep 37:1125–1135
Amaya I, Botella MA, de la Calle M, Medina MI, Heredia A, Bressan RA, Hasegawa PM, Quesada MA, Valpuesta V (1999) Improved germination under osmotic stress of tobacco plants overexpressing a cell wall peroxidase. FEBS Lett 457:80–84
Amitai-Zeigerson H, Scolnik PA, Bar-Zvi D (1995) Tomato Asr1 mRNA and protein are transiently expressed following salt stress, osmotic stress and treatment with abscisic acid. Plant Sci 110:205–213
Arnon DI (1949) Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts polyphenol oxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol 24:1–15
Ashraf M, Foolad MR (2007) Roles of glycine betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance. Environ Exp Bot 59:206–216
Ashraf M, Harris PJ (2004) Potential biochemical indicators of salinity tolerance in plants. Plant Sci 166:3–16
Bates LS, Waldern R, Teare ID (1973) Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies. Plant Soil 39:205–207
Bubner B, Gase K, Baldwin IT (2004) Two-fold differences are the detection limit for determining transgene copy numbers in plants by real-time PCR. BMC Biotechnol 4:14–24
Cakir B, Agasse A, Gaillard C, Saumonneau A, Delrot S, Atanassova R (2003) A grape ASR protein involved in sugar and abscisic acid signaling. Plant Cell 15:2165–2180
Carrari F, Fernie AR, Iusem ND (2004) Heard it through the grapevine? ABA and sugar cross-talk: the ASR story. Trends Plant Sci 9:57–59
Chomczynski P, Sacchi N (1987) Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem 162:156–159
Dai J-R, Liu B, Feng D-R, H-y L, Y-m H, K-b Q, Wang H-B, Wang J-F (2011) MpAsr encodes an intrinsically unstructured protein and enhances osmotic tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Rep 30:1219–1230
Das M, Chauhan H, Chhibbar A, Mohd Q, Haq R, Khurana P (2011) High-efficiency transformation and selective tolerance against biotic and abiotic stress in mulberry, Morus indica cv. K2, by constitutive and inducible expression of tobacco osmotin. Transgenic Res 20:231–246
de Jonge HR, Hogema B, Tilly BC (2000) Protein N-myristoylation: critical role in apoptosis and salt tolerance. Sci. STKE 2000:pe1-4
Farazi TA, Waksman G, Gordon JI (2001) The biology and enzymology of protein N-myristoylation. J Biol Chem 276:39501–39504
Fink AL (2005) Natively unfolded proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 15:35–41
Frankel N, Nunes-Nesi A, Balbo I, Mazuch J, Centeno D, Iusem ND, Fernie AR, Carrari F (2007) ci21A/Asr1 expression influences glucose accumulation in potato tubers. Plant Mol Biol 63:719–730
Giri B, Kapoor R, Mukherji KG (2007) Improved tolerance of Acacia nilotica to salt stress by arbuscular mycorrhiza, Glomus fasciculatum, may be partly related to elevated K+/Na+ ratios in root and shoot tissues. Microb Ecol 54:753–760
Goldgur Y, Rom S, Ghirlando R, Shkolnik D, Shadrin N, Konrad Z, Bar-Zvi D (2007) Desiccation and zinc binding induce transition of tomato abscisic acid stress ripening 1, a water stress- and salt stress-regulated plant-specific protein, from unfolded to folded state. Plant Physiol 143:617–628
Guo L, Yu Y, Xia X, Yin W (2010) Identification and functional characterisation of the promoter of the calcium sensor gene CBL1 from the xerophyte Ammopiptanthus mongolicus. BMC Plant Biol 10:18–33
Gupta K, Agarwal PK, Reddy MK, Jha B (2010) SbDREB2A, an A-2 type DREB transcription factor from extreme halophyte Salicornia brachiata confers abiotic stress tolerance in Escherichia coli. Plant Cell Rep 29:1131–1137
Horsch RB, Fry JE, Hoffmann NL, Eichholtz D, Rogers SG, Farley RT (1985) A simple and general method for transferring genes into plants. Science 227:1229–1231
Husaini AM, Abdin MZ (2008) Development of transgenic strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) plants tolerant to salt stress. Plant Sci 174:446–455
Ishitani M, Liu J, Halfter U, Kim C-S, Shi W, Zhu J-K (2000) SOS3 function in plant salt tolerance requires N-myristoylation and calcium binding. Plant Cell 12:1667–1677
Iusem ND, Bartholomew DM, Hitz WD, Scolnik PA (1993) Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) transcript induced by water deficit and ripening. Plant Physiol 102:1353–1354
Jha A, Joshi M, Yadav NS, Agarwal PK, Jha B (2011a) Cloning and characterization of the Salicornia brachiata Na+/H+ antiporter gene SbNHX1 and its expression by abiotic stress. Mol Biol Rep 38:1965–1973
Jha B, Agarwal PK, Reddy PS, Lal S, Sopory SK, Reddy MK (2009) Identification of salt-induced genes from Salicornia brachiata, an extreme halophyte through expressed sequence tags analysis. Genes Genet Syst 84:111–120
Jha B, Sharma A, Mishra A (2011b) Expression of SbGSTU (tau class glutathione S-transferase) gene isolated from Salicornia brachiata in tobacco for salt tolerance. Mol Biol Rep 38:4823–4832
Kalifa Y, Perlson E, Gilad A, Konrad Z, Scolnik PA, Bar-Zvi D (2004) Over-expression of the water and salt stress-regulated Asr1 gene confers an increased salt tolerance. Plant Cell Environ 27:1459–1468
Konrad Z, Bar-Zvi D (2008) Synergism between the chaperone-like activity of the stress regulated ASR1 protein and the osmolyte glycine-betaine. Planta 227:1213–1219
Koiwa H, Li F, McCully MG, Mendoza I, Koizumi N, Manabe Y, Nakagawa Y, Zhu J, Rus A, Pardo JM, Bressan RA, Hasegawa PM (2003) The STT3a subunit isoform of the Arabidopsis oligosaccharyltransferase controls adaptive responses to salt/osmotic stress. Plant Cell 15:2273–2284
Lal S, Gulyani V, Khurana P (2008) Overexpression of HVA1 gene from barley generates tolerance to salinity and water stress in transgenic mulberry (Morus indica). Transgenic Res 17:651–663
Leigh RA, Ahmad N, Wyn Jones RG (1981) Assessment of glycine betaine and proline compartmentation by analysis isolated beet vacuoles. Planta 153:34–41
Levitt J (1980) Responses of plants to environmental stress: water, radiation, salt and other stresses. Academic Press, New York
Liu H-Y, Dai J-R, Feng D-R, Liu B, Wang H-B, Wang J-F (2010) Characterization of a novel plantain Asr gene, MpAsr, that is regulated in response to infection of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense and abiotic stresses. J Integr Plant Biol 52:315–323
Lutts S, Kinet JM, Bouharmont J (1996) NaCl-induced senescence in leaves of rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars differing in salinity resistance. Ann Bot 78:389–398
Mahajan S, Tuteja N (2005) Cold, salinity and drought stresses: an overview. Arch Biochem Biophys 444:139–158
Maskin L, Frankel N, Gudesblat G, Demergasso MJ, Pietrasanta LI, Iusem ND (2007) Dimerization and DNA-binding of ASR1, a small hydrophilic protein abundant in plant tissues suffering from water loss. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 352:831–835
Maskin L, Gudesblat GE, Moreno JE, Carrari FO, Frankel N, Sambade A, Rossi MM, Iusem ND (2001) Differential expression of the members of Asr gene family in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Plant Sci 161:739–746
Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497
Parkhi V, Kumar V, Sunilkumar G, Campbell LM, Singh NK, Rathore KS (2009) Expression of apoplastically secreted tobacco osmotin in cotton confers drought tolerance. Mol Breed 23:625–639
Prilusky J, Feder CE, Zeev-Ben-Mordehai T, Rydberg E, Man O, Beckman JS, Silman I, Sussman JL (2005) FoldIndex: a simple tool to predict whether a given protein sequence is intrinsically unfolded. Bioinformatics 21:3435–3438
Rom S, Gilad A, Kalifa Y, Konrad Z, Karpasas MM, Goldgur Y, Bar-Zvi D (2006) Mapping the DNA- and zinc-binding domains of ASR1 (abscisic acid stress ripening), an abiotic-stress regulated plant specific protein. Biochimie 88:621–628
Sairam RK (1994) Effects of homobrassinolide application on plant metabolism and grain yield under irrigated and moisture-stress conditions of two wheat varieties. Plant Growth Regul 14:173–181
Shepherd CT, Lauter ANM, Scott MP (2009) Determination of transgene copy number by real-time quantitative PCR. In: Scott MP (ed) Methods in molecular biology: transgenic maize. Humana, New York
Shukla PS, Agarwal PK, Jha B (2011) Improved salinity tolerance of Arachis hypogaea (L.) by the interaction of halotolerant plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria. J Plant Growth Regul. doi:10.1007/s00344-011-9231-y
Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28:2731–2739
Töpfer R, Matzeit V, Gronenborn B, Schell J, Steinbiss HH (1987) A set of plant expression vectors for transcriptional and translational fusions. Nucleic Acids Res 15:5890
Uversky VN, Dunker AK (2010) Understanding protein non-folding. Biochim Biophys Acta 1804:1231–1264
Uversky VN, Gillespie JR, Fink AL (2000) Why are “natively unfolded” proteins unstructured under physiologic conditions? Proteins Struct Funct Genet 41:415–427
Virlouvet L, Jacquemot M-P, Gerentes D, Corti H, Bouton S, Gilard F, Valot B, Trouverie J, Tcherkez G, Falque M, Damerval C, Rogowsky P, Perez P, Noctor G, Zivy M, Coursol S (2011) The ZmASR1 protein influences branched-chain amino acid biosynthesis and maintains kernel yield in maize under water-limited conditions. Plant Physiol 157:917–936
Wang HJ, Hsu CM, Jauh GY, Wang CS (2005) A lily pollen ASR protein localizes to both cytoplasm and nuclei requiring a nuclear localization signal. Physiol Plant 23:314–320
Wang C, Jing C, Mao X, Chang X, Li A (2011) TaABC1, a member of the activity of bc1 complex protein kinase family from common wheat, confers enhanced tolerance to abiotic stresses in Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot 62:1299–1311
Yang CY, Chen YC, Jauh GY, Wang CS (2005) A lily ASR protein involves abscisic acid signaling and confers drought and salt resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 139:836–846
Zhang HX, Blumwald E (2001) Transgenic salt-tolerant tomato plants accumulate salt in foliage but not in fruit. Nat Biotechnol 19:765–768
Zhu JK (2002) Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 53:247–273
Acknowledgments
The authors are thankful to the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi (NWP-020), for the financial assistance. VT is thankful to CSIR for the Junior Research Fellowship.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Electronic Supplementary Materials
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary Fig. 1
The phylogenetic tress was prepared using protein accession number, viz. AAB96681 (Oryza sativa), ACI15208 (Salicornia brachiata), ACZ60128 (Musa acuminate), AAA82741 (Citrus maxima), BAI94530 (Prunus mume), AAL26889 (Prunus persica), AAB97140 (Prunus armeniaca), AAP46155 (Hevea brasiliensis), AAA34137 (Solanum lycopersicum), AAY97998 (Solanum lycopersicum), AAZ93634 (Vitis vinifera), AAA21866 (Zea mays), AAB64185 (Solanum lycopersicum), AAM51877 (Lilium longiflorum), AAD00254 (Solanum tuberosum), AAL27560 (Cucumis melo), XP_002524296 (Ricinus communis), AAY97997 (Solanum cheesmaniae), AAY98001 (S. chilense), AAY98002 (Solanum corneliomuelleri), AAY98000 (Lycopersicon peruvianum), AAY97999 (Solanum habrochaites), AAR23420 (Ginkgo biloba), ABC86744 (Vitis pseudoreticulata), ACL68147 (Musa acuminata), AAB02692 (Pinus taeda) and BT114797 (Picea glauca). AAB96796 (Solanum lycopersicum ER5) was used as an out-group to make the root of the tree. The evolutionary history of ASR-1 amino acid sequences was inferred by using the maximum likelihood method based on the JTT matrix-based model using MEGA version 5 software. The bootstrap consensus tree inferred from 1,000 replicates is taken to represent the evolutionary history of the taxa analysed. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1,000 replicates) is shown next to the branches. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site. The analysis involved 28 amino acid sequences. All ambiguous positions were removed for each sequence pair. There were a total of 222 positions in the final data set (JPEG 70 kb)
Supplementary Fig. 2
Multiple alignment of ASR-1 amino acid sequences was carried out using the sequences as in Supplementary Fig. 1 by online ClustalW program. Conserved WDS/ABA domain annotated by query against InterPro is underlined. Other conserved domains are shaded in different colours and shown by double-sided solid arrows. A N-terminal His-rich domain is highlighted with yellow colour but absent in SbASR-1 and underlined. B Zn2+-dependent DNA-binding domain of tomato ASR-1 (Rom et al. 2006). C Hydrophobic tomato ASR-1 sequence hindering DNA binding (Rom et al. 2006). D and E C-terminal-conserved NLS sequence found in two K-rich amino acid clusters separated by non-conserved 11 amino acid residues in lily LLA23 (Wang et al. 2005) while by 16 amino acid residues in SbASR-1 (DOC 43 kb)
Supplementary Fig. 3
Secondary structure of SbASR-1 predicted by ExPasy tools shows five coils and four helix loops (JPEG 111 kb)
Supplementary Table 1
Comparative analysis of SbASR-1 and other glycophytic ASR-1 proteins showed higher percentage of disorder-promoting amino acid residues and N-myristoylation site (DOC 44.0 kb)
Supplementary Table 2
Prediction of N-glycosylation sites, protein kinase C phosphorylation sites, tyrosine kinase phosphorylation sites and N-myristoylation sites by PROSCAN.BASE server (JPEG 67 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jha, B., Lal, S., Tiwari, V. et al. The SbASR-1 Gene Cloned from an Extreme Halophyte Salicornia brachiata Enhances Salt Tolerance in Transgenic Tobacco. Mar Biotechnol 14, 782–792 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10126-012-9442-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10126-012-9442-7