Abstract
Background
Caspase-8 (CASP8) and caspase-9 (CASP9) play crucial roles in regulating apoptosis, and their functional polymorphisms may alter cancer risk. Our aim was to investigate the association of CASP8 and CASP9 gene polymorphisms with gastric cancer (GC) susceptibility.
Methods
We undertook a case–control study of 88 GC cases and 480 controls to investigate the association between CASP8 −652 6N ins/del and CASP9 −1263 A>G polymorphisms and GC susceptibility by a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-restriction fragment length polymorphism method.
Results
CASP8 −652 6N ins/del polymorphism and CASP9 −1263 GG genotype were observed to be significantly associated with a reduced risk of GC. No significant association was observed between CASP8 −652 6N ins/del and CASP9 −1263 A>G polymorphisms and tumor characteristics. However, both CASP8 del/del and CASP9 −1263 GG genotypes were associated with increased overall survival in GC patients.
Conclusions
The CASP8 −652 6N ins/del and the CASP9 −1263 A>G polymorphisms were observed to play a protective role in GC predisposition.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Gastric cancer (GC) is still a major health problem worldwide due to its frequency, poor prognosis, and limited treatment options [1]. Currently available therapeutic approaches for GC are not highly effective, and thus the prognosis is poor. The selective targeting of cancer cells by the induction of apoptosis is a major goal of current cancer research. Genetic polymorphisms for genes controlling the cell cycle or apoptosis have been found to increase the risk of a number of human malignancies [2, 3]. However, such studies on GC risk are limited.
Apoptosis, is a highly organized cell programmed death process. It is an evolutionarily conserved process and is essential for organ development, tissue remodeling, immune response, and tumor suppression. Aberrant apoptosis is believed to contribute to cancer initiation and progression, and treatment failure. In addition, as apoptosis usually does not elicit the host inflammatory or immune response, this type of cell death is the preferred way of cancer cell killing by various treatments. Accordingly, selectively inducing apoptosis in cancer cells has been increasingly recognized as a promising therapeutic approach for many cancers. The broad apoptotic pathways that occur in humans–the extrinsic or receptor-mediated pathway and the intrinsic or mitochondrial pathway– both utilize the caspase enzyme cascade. The extrinsic pathway utilizes caspase-8 (CASP8) and caspase-10 (CASP10) as initiator caspases, while the intrinsic pathway employs caspase-9 (CASP9). Both pathways converge to use caspase-3 (CASP3), caspase-6 (CASP6), and caspase-7 (CASP7) as the effector caspases, which leads to typical apoptotic features such as DNA fragmentation, chromatin condensation, cell shrinkage, and membrane blebbing [4, 5].
CASP8 is a key regulator of apoptosis, an essential defense mechanism against hyperproliferation and tumorigenesis. Polymorphisms in the CASP8 gene have been reported to influence cancer risk. The variant D302H (rs1045485) has been associated with the risk of breast cancer in the European population [6]. Additionally, the −652 6N ins/del promoter variant (rs3834129) has been associated with the risk of developing multiple cancer types [7]. It has been postulated that this deletion polymorphism has direct functional effects on cancer risk, on the basis that the deletion destroys a stimulatory protein 1 binding site and decreases CASP8 transcription [7]. In contrast, Haiman et al. [8] reported that the −652 6 N ins/del promoter polymorphism in the CASP8 gene was not associated with cancer risk, and more recently Gangwar et al. [9] confirmed this finding in bladder cancer. According to our knowledge, limited data exist in the literature with regard to CASP8 polymorphisms and GC. Soung et al. [10] reported the occurrence of CASP8 mutations mainly in advanced GC. These authors also reported that CASP8 mutations decreased the cell death activity of CASP8 [10].
CASP9 is a member of the intrinsic pathway, which is activated as a result of mitochondrial damage and cytochrome c release. After cytochrome c is released into the cytoplasm, it complexes with apoptosis protease activating factor-1 (APAF-1) and forms an apoptosome with procaspase-9 and activates the CASP9 cascade. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms are the most common human genetic variation and may contribute to an individual’s susceptibility to cancer. Many studies have demonstrated that some variants affect either the expression or the activities of various enzymes and are therefore associated with cancer risk. Several candidate polymorphisms in the CASP9 gene have been reported recently in public databases (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/SNP) [11]. Although the functional effects of these polymorphisms have not been elucidated, it has been hypothesized that some of these variants, particularly their haplotypes, can influence CASP9 expression or activity, thereby modulating susceptibility to cancer. Limited data exist on the specific association between CASP9 polymorphisms and GC pathogenesis. Soung et al. [12] have suggested that the caspase-9 gene is rarely mutated in GC patients.
In the present study, in order to examine the possible association between CASP8 −652 6N ins/del and CASP9 −1263 A>G polymorphisms and GC risk we performed a hospital-based case–control study in a Greek population.
Patients, materials, and methods
Patient information
The subjects in this hospital-based case–control were 88 unrelated GC patients together with 480 ethnically and sex- and age-matched healthy individuals (controls). All patients and controls were born and have been living in Greece. All patients gave their informed consent and the hospital review board approved the study. The patients were followed up until August 2010 or death. The median time (±SD) of follow-up was 36.27 (±19.5) months. Seventeen patients were lost to follow-up. The characteristics of the GC patients at diagnosis are presented in Table 1.
Genotyping
DNA was isolated from peripheral blood using the Nucleospin blood kit (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany). To confirm the integrity of DNAs, initially a 430 bp sequence of the human glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene (GAPDH) was amplified. Polymorphisms in CASP8 (−652 6N ins/del) and CASP9 (−1263 A>G) were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP). Details of primers and PCR conditions were described earlier [7, 11]. The mutations were confirmed by sequencing analysis using a Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and an ABI 377 automated sequencer. As a negative control of the PCR amplifications, we used distilled water instead of genomic DNA and confirmed the fidelity of the reactions.
Statistical analysis
Genotype and allele frequencies were compared with the χ2 test with Yates’ correction using S-Plus (v. 6.2; Insightful, Seattle, WA, USA). Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained with GraphPad (v. 3.00; GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). The P values are all two-sided. Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium was verified by calculation of the expected frequencies and numbers, and significance testing was based on the 1 df χ2. Strong association (significance) was assumed at P < 0.001. A weak but still significant association, meriting attention, was considered for values ranging between 0.01 and 0.05.
Results
A total of 480 controls and 88 GC cases were recruited for this study. The histological characteristics of the patients are presented in Table 1. The genotypic distributions of the two gene polymorphisms were in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. The genotype and allele frequencies of the CASP8 and CASP9 gene polymorphisms in healthy controls and GC patients are shown in Table 2. The variant −652 6N del/del genotype was 22.08% prevalent in the controls compared with 12.5% in the cases (P = 0.005). The del −652 6N allele was significantly higher in controls as compared with cases (48.54 vs. 36.36%, P = 0.004). Carriers of the −652 6N del/ins or del/del genotypes were at lower risk for GC than carriers of other genotypes. Concerning the CASP9 −1263 A>G polymorphism, the G allele was overrepresented in controls as compared with cases (50.94 vs. 30.68%, P < 0.0001). Individuals with the CASP9 −1263 AG or GG genotype were at lower risk for GC than those with other genotypes.
Concerning the tumor characteristics, overall no statistically significant association was observed for CASP8 and CASP9 and any parameter investigated (e.g. stage, differentiation status). To analyze the combined effect of these polymorphisms we conducted gene–gene interaction analysis; however, we did not observe any statistically significant result.
Follow-up information regarding survival was available for all the patients (Table 3). The median duration of the follow up was 36.27 months (range 1–60 months). A total of 17 patients suffered cancer-related death during the follow-up period. The hazard ratios of the CASP8 and CASP9 genotypes of the patients for overall specific survival are presented in Table 3. The −652 ins/ins and the −1263 AA genotypes were associated with poor survival (Fig. 1).
Discussion
Defects in apoptosis signaling play an important role in the pathogenesis of cancers. Cancer cell survival can be induced by the inactivation of pro-apoptotic signaling or the activation of anti-apoptotic pathways. There are two main ways that can down-regulate cancer cell apoptosis: (a) somatic and non-somatic mutation and loss of expression of pro-apoptotic molecules; and (b) overexpression of apoptosis inhibitory molecules [10, 13]. Mutations within caspase family proteases are not uncommon in cancers [14]. The present study investigated the potential association between CASP8 (−652 6N ins/del) and CASP9 (−1263 A>G) polymorphisms and the risk of GC.
Several reports show that CASP8 is mutated in different types of cancers. Soung et al. [10] examined gastric, breast, non-small cell lung cancers, and acute leukemia for mutations within the CASP8 gene using single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) methodology. Interestingly, the CASP8 mutations were mostly detected in GC cases but not in other cancers.
The CASP8 −652 6N del allele has been found to destroy a binding element for stimulatory protein 1 and to reduce the expression of CASP8, thus resulting in a reduction in the apoptosis reactivity of T lymphocytes upon stimulation by cancer cells or phytohemagglutinin in an ex vivo model [7]. This deletion variant was found to be associated with a reduced risk of lung, esophageal, stomach, breast, and cervical cancers in a Chinese population [7]. However, these findings failed to be replicated in subsequent larger studies [8, 9, 15]. In agreement with Sun et al. [7], we observed that the CASP8 −652 6N del allele was associated with a significantly decreased risk of GC. Additionally, the data of our study provided evidence for the association of the CASP8 −652 6N ins/del polymorphism and overall survival. The Kaplan–Meier curve showed a potential association of the presence of the del allele with increased survival.
CASP9 is involved in activation through the apoptosome-driven intrinsic pathway [16]. The release of apoptogenic proteins, caused by perturbation of the mitochondria, results in the activation of caspases which are responsible for most of the biochemical and morphological changes observed during apoptosis. APAF-1 in the presence of cytochrome c and dATP oligomerizes to form a very large apoptosome complex. The apoptosome recruits and processes caspase-9 to form a holoenzyme complex, which, in turn, recruits and activates the effector caspases. The influence of the CASP9 −1263 A>G polymorphism on the development and progression of gastric, colorectal, or other cancers remains to be determined, as its functional importance in the activation of CASP9 by the apoptosome complex and in the efficiency of effector caspase activation by CASP9 is largely obscure for both these actions. One can only speculate that the CASP9 −1263 A>G polymorphism may affect either the binding affinity and stability of the apoptosome or the CASP9-induced activation of other caspases, in order to influence positively or adversely the intrinsic apoptotic pathway. Taking into consideration the biological role of CASP9, such functional alterations, either towards the activating or the repressing side, may also be expressed in an inherently variable, promoting or prohibitive, tumor microenvironment.
No data exist regarding CASP9 gene polymorphisms and the risk of GC. However, studies of different cancer types have shown that the CASP9 −1263 A>G polymorphism was associated with a significantly decreased risk of lung and bladder cancer [9, 17]. In the present study we found that the carriers of the −1263 G allele had a reduced risk of GC. Furthermore, the data of our study provided evidence for the association of the CASP9 −1263 A>G polymorphism and overall survival. The Kaplan–Meier curve showed a potential association of the presence of the G allele with increased survival.
In conclusion, CASP8 −652 6N ins/del and CASP9 −1263 A>G promoter polymorphisms are significantly associated with the risk of GC. Because genetic polymorphisms often show ethnic differences, further studies are needed in diverse ethnic populations to clarify the association between caspase gene polymorphisms and GC.
References
Compare D, Rocco A, Nardone G. Risk factors in gastric cancer. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2010;14:302–8.
Wang W, Spitz MR, Yang H, Lu C, Stewart DJ, Wu X. Genetic variants in cell cycle control pathway confer susceptibility to lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:5974–81.
Ye Y, Yang H, Grossman HB, Dinney C, Wu X, Gu J. Genetic variants in cell cycle control pathway confer susceptibility to bladder cancer. Cancer. 2008;112:2467–74.
Hajra KM, Liu JR. Apoptosome dysfunction in human cancer. Apoptosis. 2004;9:691–704.
Nicholson DW, Thornberry NA. Caspases: killer proteases. Trends Biochem Sci. 1997;22:299–306.
Cox A, Dunning AM, Garcia-Closas M, Balasubramanian S, Reed MW, Pooley KA, et al. A common coding variant in CASP8 is associated with breast cancer risk. Nat Genet. 2007;39:352–8.
Sun T, Gao Y, Tan W, Ma S, Shi Y, Yao J, et al. A six-nucleotide insertion-deletion polymorphism in the CASP8 promoter is associated with susceptibility to multiple cancers. Nat Genet. 2007;39:605–13.
Haiman CA, Garcia RR, Kolonel LN, Henderson BE, Wu AH, Le Marchand L. A promoter polymorphism in the CASP8 gene is not associated with cancer risk. Nat Genet. 2008;40:259–60.
Gangwar R, Mandhani A, Mittal RD. Caspase 9 and caspase 8 gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to bladder cancer in north Indian population. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:2028–34.
Soung YH, Lee JW, Kim SY, Jang J, Park YG, Park WS, et al. CASPASE-8 gene is inactivated by somatic mutations in gastric carcinomas. Cancer Res. 2005;65:815–21.
Theodoropoulos GE, Michalopoulos NV, Panoussopoulos SG, Taka S, Gazouli M. Effects of caspase-9 and survivin gene polymorphisms in pancreatic cancer risk and tumor characteristics. Pancreas. 2010;39:976–80.
Soung YH, Lee JW, Kim SY, Park WS, Nam SW, Lee JY, et al. Mutational analysis of proapoptotic caspase-9 gene in common human carcinomas. APMIS. 2006;114:292–7.
Freedman ML, Penney KL, Stram DO, Le Marchand L, Hirschhorn JN, Kolonel LN, et al. Common variation in BRCA2 and breast cancer risk: a haplotype-based analysis in the Multiethnic Cohort. Hum Mol Genet. 2004;13:2431–41.
Devarajan E, Sahin AA, Chen JS, Krishnamurthy RR, Aggarwal N, Brun AM, et al. Down-regulation of caspase 3 in breast cancer: a possible mechanism for chemoresistance. Oncogene. 2002;21:8843–51.
Pittman AH, Broderick P, Sullivan K, Fielding S, Webb E, Penegar S, et al. CASP8 variants D302H and −652 6N ins/del do not influence the risk of colorectal cancer in the United Kingdom population. Br J Cancer. 2008;98:1434–6.
Twiddy D, Cain K. Caspase-9 cleavage, do you need it? J Biochem. 2007;405:e1–2.
Park JY, Park JM, Jang JS, Choi JE, Kim KM, Cha SI, et al. Caspase 9 promoter polymorphisms and risk of primary lung cancer. Hum Mol Genet. 2006;1:1963–71.
Acknowledgments
The study was supported by the Hellenic Society for Medical Oncology (HESMO).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liamarkopoulos, E., Gazouli, M., Aravantinos, G. et al. Caspase 8 and caspase 9 gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 14, 317–321 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-011-0045-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-011-0045-1