Introduction

Surgery is the treatment of choice in symptomatic chiari malformation (CM) patients. Once hydrocephalus is ruled out, the degree of tonsillar ectopia and the presence of hydromyelia are evaluated, than the treatment may be performed, based on the indication of clinical symptoms.

Well-timed intervention is the most important factor for a favourable result, notably in patients with a proved medullary compromise.

Despite being a relatively safe procedure, craniovertebral decompression (CVD) is not completely devoid of risks of complications, such as bleedings, damage to neural structures, CSF fistulas, meningitis, pseudomeningocele and occipito-cervical instability. Acute post-operative hydrocephalus and anterior compression of the brain stem by retroflexion of odontoid have been seldom described [4]. Moreover, the cerebellar “slump” due to a highly extended CVD, especially by an occipital bone lateral or superior opening and a big duroplasty, is a complication that needs a complex correction by cranioplasty.

Patients and methods

Between January 1999 and June 2007, in the Clinic of Neurosurgery of the University Federico II in Naples, 36 patients with CMI have been treated (17 males; 19 females, average age 36 years). Twenty-five had also an associated syringomyelia (70%).

At admission, the whole group reported a suboccipital headache worsened by Valsalva manoeuvres, while neurological examination was altered in 30 patients (83%).

On 22 patients, a pure bone decompression (osseous CVD) was performed by a suboccipital craniectomy and a C1 laminectomy. On the remaining 14 patients, a duraplasty was associated, using a synthetic dural substitute or a pericranial graft.

In the same period, eight CMII patients were treated in our clinic (3 males; 5 females, average age 10 years). A ventriculo-peritoneal shunt was implanted on each CMII patient at birth, when their spinal cleft had been closed. All the patients presented a spinal syrinx of protean length and diameter. Clinical examination at admission showed occipito-cervical headache, variable degree of scoliosis, cerebellar signs and lower cervical nerves injuries. Therefore, duraplasty after bone decompression was considered to be appropriate.

The follow up was between 2 and 8 years (average 5 years), evaluating the clinical history, pre- and postoperative neurological examination, radiological imaging and the type of surgical procedure.

Neuroradiological assessment

Magnetic resonance (MR) in CM patients should be extended on the whole brain and spinal cord, to allow the evaluation of tonsillar ectopia degree, size of the ventricular cavities, presence and length of syrinx and craniovertebral junction and spinal associated dysmorphysms. Post-operative MRI of brain and spinal cord were performed at least 1 year after surgery.

Surgical technique

The patients were prone positioned, with head flexed and fixed by Mayfield head frame with no rotation. A middle linear skin incision was carried out from inion to spinous process of C2 and the muscolo-fascial plane was opened. The occipital squama and the posterior arch of atlas were exposed; after a musculoskeletal dissection, a middle suboccipital craniectomy was performed and the posterior arch of atlas was removed. Then dural layer was removed at the level of atlo-occipital junction, or, if necessary, the dura mater was opened and grafted (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Intraoperative images of posterior cranial fossa decompression: a skin incision and musculoskeletal dissection; b suboccipital craniectomy; c dura mater opening; d, e intradural exploration of cisterna magna; f apposition of synthetic dural patch

Results

75% of CMI patients and 60% of CMII showed clinical improvement at post-operative examination, with reversal of headache in 100% and disappearance of neurological deficits in 40% of the whole series of CMI and 25% of CMII. Clinical stability was observed in the 60% of CMI and in the 75% of CMII (Table 1).

Table 1 Summary of clinical outcomes

Clinical examination was carried out 6 and 18 months after surgery, showing a further clinical improvement in 5% of CMI and only in 2% of CMII patients. No change was observed at further controls.

Neuroradiological examination 1 year after surgery revealed a decreasing diameter of syrinx in 20% and no change in the remaining cases. The whole group showed restoration of CSF dynamic in subarachnoidal spaces of PCF. No change in following examinations. About post-operative complications, three cases had a pseudomeningocele and two had an aseptic meningitis out of the 36 CMI cases; one aseptic meningitis occurred in the CMII series.

Discussion

Chiari malformation has been historically considered a rare disease, however, wide application of MRI examination on the population showed an unexpectedly higher prevalence. Clinical presentation may happen between 6 and 60 years (average age at diagnosis, 40 years) and may be earlier in patients with syrinx [7]. Surgical treatment of CM patients presents three main questions.

  1. 1.

    Which patients to treat? There is consensus that indication to surgery should be based on occurrence of clinical symptoms rather than on radiological findings. But the clinic may vary from a complete absence of symptoms to headache, episodes of pseudotumor cerebri, Meniér-like syndrome and spinal cord disturbances [3, 5, 6, 8]. The presence of a syrinx is responsible for a cohort of specific signs and symptoms that range from dysesthetic sensations with classical algothermal dissociation to spasticity and paresis.

The contemporary presence of CM and a syrinx is considered as an absolute indication to decompressive surgery, even if recently some authors reported some cases of asymptomatic patients with syrinx with its spontaneous disappearance [1].

Clinical findings of CMII patients are often due to lower cranial nerve deficits and to brainstem dysfunction, but caused by an associated hydrocephalus and syringomyelia [9, 10]. The clinical onset CMII in neonates frequently presents as a surgical emergency: a severe damage of brain stem can appear with rapid neurological worsening. No doubts about indication to surgery in the symptomatic infants, while it remains controversial in asymptomatic patients with a syrinx larger than 50% of transverse spinal diameter [10].

  1. 2.

    What is the best way of treating? The treatment of choice is CVD, alone or with duraplasty. In CMI patients, limited bone decompression and outer dural layer removal is usually enough. A meta-analysis of Durham et al. has reported an improvement of syrinx size in 50% with simple suboccipital cranietcomy and in 80–100% if associated with duraplasty [2]. So the “mini-invasive” approach reduces time of hospitalization, at the price of a lower chance to solve the problem.

There is no consensus about best treatment of CMII. In our experience, CMI patients with no or small syrinx, were submitted to simple bone decompression with atlo-occipital ligament removal, while patients with a symptomatic medullary cavity underwent duraplasty as well. Clinical improvement was obtained in 75% of CMI patients, with remission of pre-operative neurological signs in 40% of them. The rate of post-operative complications in our series was 14%: we had three cases of occipital meningocele and two patients with aseptic meningitis.

CMII patients were subjected to suboccipital craniectomy, C1 laminectomy, dura mater opening, cisterna magna exploration, sub-arachnoidal adherences lysis and duraplasty. We obtained a lasting clinical improvement in 62% and a remission of neurological deficits in 20% of the cases. The only complication was an aseptical meningitis (rate of complication, 12%).

The size of syrinx was stable in 80% and decreased in 20% of the whole series, despite a valid liquoral flow through the sub-arachnoidal spaces of PCF was documented in all the cases.

  1. 3.

    When? There is no literature data about surgical timing, even if it is clear that early treatment prevents neurological impairment [912]. CMII patients need surgery as soon as signs or symptoms are detected. Thus, surgery plays a preventive role on the occurring symptoms.

Conclusions

Surgical treatment of Chiari malformation is effective and technically safe, with clinical and neurological improvement and, in severe cases, long-term stabilization. In our experience symptomatic CM patients need decompressive surgery as soon as possible in order to avoid further neurological impairment.

For what concerns the so-called “mini-invasive” technique, it is indicated in patients who have no or a small syrynx, because it has a low rate of post-operative complications, but also a less chance of obtaining syrynx shrinkage.