Abstract
A wide array of options are now available for migraine prophylaxis. Conventional treatments include beta-blockers, anticonvulsants, antidepressants, calcium antagonists and antiserotoninergic drugs. Emerging medications such as ACE inhibitors, sartans and nutritional supplements are gaining favour for migraine prophylaxis. Botulinum toxin type A is a promising therapeutic tool for chronic migraine. Tonabersat is likely to be a step forward for the treatment of migraine with aura. However, much work is needed to identify predictive clinical features of successful responsiveness and to better define the duration of prophylaxis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Migraine is a chronic, disabling neurological condition characterized by recurrent episodes of headache associated with sensory and autonomic symptoms which affects up to 15% of adult population [1]. CNS dysfunction plays a pivotal role in migraine pathophysiology, with various parts of the trigeminal system necessary for expression of peripheral symptoms [2, 3]. Approximately 90% of migraineurs experience moderate or severe pain, 75% is highly disabled and 35% is bedridden during the attacks [4, 5].
A preventive treatment should be considered for all migraineurs whose attacks have a critical impact on working productivity, social, familial and recreational activities despite appropriate use of acute medications. The primary goal of prophylaxis is to reduce the attack frequency of ≥50%. It may also reduce headache intensity, duration and disability and improve response to acute medications. Prophylaxis reduces the risk of medication overuse, migraine progression and, hypothetically, brain damage [6]. Patients with ≥3 disabling attacks per month who fail to adequately respond to acute medication should start a prophylactic treatment, possibly as a monotherapy, starting at low doses. Although epidemiological studies indicate that approximately 25% of migraine patients should require migraine prevention, preventive drug treatments are used by a small percentage of patients [5].
The present study will review conventional and emerging treatments and discuss the unmet needs in migraine prevention.
Conventional prophylactic drugs
Antiepileptics
Antiepileptics are very effective in migraine prophylaxis and reduce migraine frequency by 1.4 attacks/month [7].
Sodium valproate (800–1,500 mg/day) is among first-line treatments in prevention of episodic, chronic and refractory migraine. Its mode of action encompasses enhancement of GABA-mediated neurotransmission, attenuation of low threshold T-type Ca2+ channels, blocking of voltage-dependent Na+ channels and attenuation of plasma extravasation [7]. Valproate reduces migraine frequency by ≥50% in significantly more patients than placebo (OR: 2.74, 95% CI 1.48–5.08; p = 0.001; NNT = 3.1) [8, 9]. Side effects include nausea (NNH = 7), fatigue (NNH = 15), tremor (NNH = 12.5), weight gain (NNH = 18.8) and dizziness (NNH = 16.3) [8]. Birth defects occur in 10.7% of infant exposed in the first trimester as compared to 1.6% in controls (RR: 7.3, 95% CI 4.4–12.2) [10].
Topiramate is a Ca2+ and Na+ channel blocker which blocks glutamate, inhibits carbonic anhydrase and stimulates GABA production. It modulates cortical hyperexcitability, inhibits glutamate signaling in trigeminal afferents and modulates nociceptive transmission through GABA-A receptors in the trigeminal nucleus caudalis and descending brainstem pathways [7]. A number of studies explored the efficacy of topiramate (50–200 mg/day) in the prevention of episodic, chronic, refractory and pediatric migraine. Topiramate is superior to placebo in reducing monthly migraine frequency by ≥50% (OR: 2.44, 95% CI 1.81–3.28, p = 0.0001; NNT = 3.9) [8, 9]. At the dose of 100 mg, the most frequent adverse events are parestesias (NNH = 2.4), weight loss (NNH = 11.1), anorexia (NNH = 11.7), taste disturbances (NNH = 15.3), memory problems (NNH = 16.6), nausea (NNH = 23.1) and fatigue (NNH = 31.2) [8].
Gabapentin enhances GABA turnover and release, and decreases the release of noradrenaline, dopamine and serotonin by binding to a subunit of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels. [7]. Gabapentin (1,200–2,400 mg/day) is superior to placebo in reducing migraine frequency by ≥50% (OR: 4.51; 95% CI 1.51–13.43, p = 0.007; NNT = 3.3) [11]. It is considered a third-line treatment for migraine prevention [8].
Beta-blockers
Beta-blockers are first-line drugs in migraine prophylaxis. Blockade of β1-mediated effects and consequent inhibition of Na+ release and tyrosine hydroxylase activity are considered the main mechanisms of action. Beta-blockers reduce the neuronal firing rate of noradrenergic neurons of the locus coeruleus, regulate the firing rate of PAG neurons and probably interact with the serotonergic system by blocking 5-HT2C and 5-HT2B receptors. It has been hypothesized that beta-blockers exert some of their prophylactic effects in migraine through an action at the ventroposteromedial thalamic nucleus and inhibition of cortical spreading depression (CSD) [12]. Clinical findings support the efficacy of propranolol (80–240 mg/day), timolol (10–20 mg/day), metoprolol (50–200 mg/day), atenolol (50–100 mg/day), nadolol (80–120 mg/day) and nebivolol (5 mg/day). Propranolol is superior to placebo in reducing migraine frequency by ≥50% (OR: 1.94, 95% CI 1.61–2.35, p < 0.00001). Responders rate with propranolol is similar to metopropol but lower than nadolol (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.37–0.97, p = 0.04) [13].
Antidepressants
Tricyclics potentiates 5-HTergic transmission and block activation of trigeminovascular system [12]. A metanalysis of 37 RCTs indicates that tricyclics (amitriptyline 25–150 mg/day, desipramine 150 mg/day, chlorimipramine 30–150 mg/day, nortriptyline 100 mg/day) are more effective than placebo in reducing the frequency of migraine attacks (average standardized mean difference −0.70, 95% CI −0.93 to −0.48) but not superior to SSRI (−0.22, 95% CI −0.75 to 0.31). Tricyclics increases their effect with longer duration of treatment (β = −0.11, 95% CI −0.63 to −0.15) and are more likely to reduce the intensity of migraine by ≥50% than either placebo (1.80, 95% CI 1.24–2.62) or SSRI (1.72, 95% CI 1.15–2.55). In addition, tricyclics cause more adverse effects than placebo (1.53, 95% CI 1.11–2.12) and SSRI (2.22, 95% CI 1.52–3.32) but do not increase dropout rates [14].
Venlafaxine 150 mg is superior to placebo for migraine prevention, with a median reduction of 4 days with migraine in the last 2 weeks of therapy as compared to the first 2 weeks [15].
Antiserotoninergic agents
Pizotifen blocks 5-HT2 and 5-HT1C receptors and weakly inhibits H1 histamine and muscarinic receptors. Five studies reported a beneficial effect of pizotifen (1.5–3 mg/day) over placebo for migraine prophylaxis. Osterman reported a 50% responder rate in 43% of patients with pizotifen, compared with 4% during placebo treatment in a crossover study. The main adverse effects are weight gain and sedation [16].
Methysergide, the first effective prophylactic migraine drug, is a semi-synthetic ergot alkaloid structurally related to methylergonovine which blocks 5-HT1 and 5-HT2 receptors and inhibits the release of histamine from mast cells. 11 RCTs compared methysergide (3–6 mg/day) to placebo or to active drug. In four trials, methysergide was superior to placebo for either severe headaches or attack frequency and in four trials was found to be comparable to pizotifen. Methysergide was also found to be comparable to lisuride, propranolol and flunarizine. Because of its side effects (fibrotic changes in the retroperitoneal, pleuropulmonary, cardiac, and other tissues), it should be reserved for severe cases in which other migraine preventive drugs are not effective. It should not be used continuously, but with a treatment-free interval of 1 or 2 months every 6 month in order to minimize the chronic side-effects of fibrosis [17].
Calcium antagonists
Flunarizine regulates neuronal excitability and attenuates dural vasodilatation probably by blocking L-type Ca2+ and Na+ channels and reducing NO synthesis [12]. A meta-analysis on four RCTs showed a significant reduction in the frequency of attacks using flunarizine 10 mg versus placebo with a monthly difference of 0.55 attacks (95% CI 0.215–0.895; p = 0.002). Somnolence and weight gain are the most frequent adverse effect. Flunarizine should be avoided in the elderly because of the risk of parkinsonism [18].
Emerging prophylactic drugs
ACE inhibitors and sartans
Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers modulate vasoreactivity, alter sympathetic tone, inhibit oxidative stress, promote degradation of proinflammatory factors such as substance P, enkephalin and bradykinin and probably modulate the endogenous opioid system [12].
Telmisartan (80 mg mg/day) induces a 38% reduction in migraine days versus 15% with placebo (p = 0.03) but a only bordeline difference in responders (p = 0.07) [19]. Candesartan (16 mg/day) provides effective migraine prophylaxis showing a significant reduction in days with headache as compared to placebo (p > 0.001) with a good tolerability profile [20]. Lisinopril (20 mg/day) reduces hours with headache, days with headache and days with migraine by 20, 17, 21, respectively, compared with placebo [21].
Vitamins, minerals and herbal agents
Nutritional supplements acting on mitochondrial metabolism may antagonize energetic dysfunction in migraine by stabilizing neuronal function, restoring high-energy phosphate homeostasis and reducing brain oxidative stress.
Riboflavin (400 mg/day) and Coenzyme Q10 (300 mg/day) are more effective than placebo for a ≥50% reduction in migraine frequency (Riboflavin OR: 5.6, 95% CI 1.64–19.5, p = 0.006; Coenzyme Q10 OR: 5.45, 95% CI 1.23–24.26, p = 0.03) [22, 23]. Magnesium is the only preventive agent with a category-A pregnancy rating and is an appropriate choice for prophylaxis in women who are pregnant or trying to conceive. Magnesium citrate 600 mg/day showed a significantly higher reduction in migraine frequency in the final month of treatment as compared to baseline (−1.51) as compared to placebo (−0.58, p = 0.03) [24]. Petasites Hybridus, a herbaceous perennial plant in the family Asteraceae, showed an OR of 2.16 for a 50% reduction in migraine frequency when compared with placebo at the dose of 150 mg/day (95% CI 1.06–4.38, p = 0.03) [25]. A systematic review of 5 trials on Tenacetum Partenium concluded that there is insufficient evidence to suggest an effect over and above placebo for preventing migraine [26].
Botulinum toxin type A
In experimental models, Botulinum toxin type A (BTA) inhibits substance P release in the dorsal root ganglion and CGRP release from the trigeminal ganglion, showing also suppressive effects on the trigeminal/cervical nociceptive system. The rationale of its use in migraine is the inhibition of peripheral sensitization which would lead to an indirect reduction in central sensitization. Evidence from 8 RCTs does not support the efficacy of BTA for the prophylaxis of episodic migraine [27]. Two phase III studies of BTA in chronic migraine have been completed. In PREEMPT1 study, BTA was not different from placebo with regard to change in number of headache episodes from baseline [28]. In PREEMT2, BTA was reported to induce a significant reduction of headache days as compared to placebo (9.0 vs. 6.7 days, p < 0.001) [29]. A pooled analysis of data from PREEMPT1 and PREEMPT2 also showed a significant benefit of BTA over placebo with regard to headache days and headache episodes and BTA was also reported to be effective in a subgroup of patients with medication overuse. BTA was safe and well tolerated, with few treatment-related adverse events [30].
Tonabersat
Tonabersat (a novel benzopyran derivative) blocks CSD, associated nitric oxide synthase activation and cyclic GMP increase in the brain, possibly by binding to a connexin and modulating gap-junction function. Tonabersat (40 mg/day) showed a preventive effect on migraine with aura reducing median attacks of aura from 3.2 (1.0–5.0) per 12 weeks on placebo to 1.0 (0–3.0) on tonabersat (p = 0.01), but has no efficacy on non-aura attacks, challenging the view that silent CSD triggers migraine attacks without aura. Tonabersat is likely to be a useful option for the management of patients with aura [31].
Short-term prophylactic treatment
A short-term prevention may be indicated for women with menstrual-related migraine, whose attacks occur on day 2–3 of menstruation in at least two of three menstrual cycles. Drugs used in this way have included oestrogens, NSAIDs, ergots, magnesium and triptans. A systematic review of ten RCTs on short-term prevention (7 days) in perimenstrual migraine suggests the use of transcutaneous estrogen 1.5 mg, frovatriptan 2.5 mg twice daily, and naratriptan 1 mg twice daily [32].
What we still need?
In spite of a bewildering array of options for migraine prophylaxis at least two crucial issues remain unresolved:
How to choose the preventive drug?
Current pharmacological prophylaxis is tailored on the disease, not on patient’s phenotype. There is no characterization of specific subsets of migraineurs nor predictive clinical features to guide the choice among preventative agents. As a consequence, the therapeutic strategy is still based on non-specific criteria such as comorbidities and, above all, side effects of the drug.
How long should successful prophylaxis be continued?
In most cases, efficacy begins to wane after discontinuation on the drug. No scientific evidence exists as yet to suggest how long successful migraine prophylaxis should be prolonged. In clinical practice, preventive medication is usually stopped after 4–6 months of treatment to verify is still needed. However, a long-term treatment should be encouraged in those patients at risk for migraine chronification, with medication overuse or contraindication to acute therapies.
References
Rasmussen BK (1995) Epidemiology of headache. Cephalalgia 15:45–68
Schoenen J (2006) Neurophysiological features of the migrainous brain. Neurol Sci 27(2):77–81
Olesen J, Burstein R, Ashina M, Tfelt-Hansen P (2009) Origin of pain in migraine: evidence for peripheral sensitisation. Lancet Neurol 8:679–690
Lipton RB, Stewart WF, Diamond S et al (2001) Prevalence and burden of migraine in the United States: data from the American Migraine Study II. Headache 41:646–657
Lipton RB, Bigal ME, Diamond M et al (2007) Migraine prevalence, disease burden, and the need for preventive therapy. Neurology 68:343–349
Schmitz N, Admiraal-Behloul F, Arkink EB et al (2008) Attack frequency and disease duration as indicators for brain damage in migraine. Headache 48(7):1044–1055
Vikelis M, Rapoport AM (2010) Role of antiepileptic drugs as preventive agents for migraine. CNS Drugs 24(1):21–33
Chronicle E, Mulleners W (2004) Anticonvulsant drugs for migraine prophylaxis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3: CD003226
Pringsheim T, Davenport WJ, Becker WJ (2010) Prophylaxis of migraine headache. CMAJ 182(7):E269–E276
Wyszynski DF, Nambisan M, Surve T et al (2005) Increased rate of major malformations in offspring exposed to valproate during pregnancy. Neurology 64(6):961–965
Mathew NT, Rapoport A, Saper J et al (2001) Efficacy of gabapentin in migraine prophylaxis. Headache 41:119–128
Galletti F, Cupini LM, Corbelli I et al (2009) Pathophysiological basis of migraine prophylaxis. Prog Neurobiol 89(2):176–192
Linde K, Rossnagel K (2004) Propranolol for migraine prophylaxis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2: CD003225
Jackson JL, Shimeall W, Sessums L et al (2010) Tricyclic antidepressants and headaches: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 341: c5222. doi:10.1136/bmj.c5222
Ozyalcin SN, Talu GK, Kiziltan E et al (2005) The efficacy and safety of venlafaxine in the prophylaxis of migraine. Headache 45(2):144–152
Osterman PO (1977) A comparison between placebo, pizotifen and 1-isopropyl-3-hydroxy-5-semicarbazono-6-oxo-2.3.5.6-tetrahydroindol (Divascan) in migraine prophylaxis. Acta Neurol Scand 56(1):17–28
Silberstein SD (1998) Methysergide. Cephalalgia 18(7):421–435
Reveiz-Herault L, Cardona AF, Ospina EG, Carrillo P (2003) Effectiveness of flunarizine in the prophylaxis of migraine: a meta-analytical review of the literature. Rev Neurol 36(10):907–912
Diener HC, Gendolla A, Feuersenger A et al (2009) Telmisartan in migraine prophylaxis: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Cephalalgia 29(9):921–927
Tronvik E, Stovner LJ, Bovim G et al (2008) Angiotensin-converting enzyme gene insertion/deletion polymorphism in migraine patients. BMC Neurol 8: 4
Schuh-hofer S, Flach U, Meisel A et al (2007) Efficacy of lisinopril in migraine prophylaxis–an open label study. Eur J Neurol 14(6):701–703
Schoenen J, Jacquy J, Lenaerts M (1998) Effectiveness of high-dose riboflavin in migraine prophylaxis: a randomized controlled trial. Neurology 50:466–470
Sándor P, Di Clemente L, Coppola G et al (2005) Efficacy of coenzyme Q10 in migraine prophylaxis: a randomized, controlled trial. Neurology 64:713–715
Peikert A, Wilimzig C, Kohne-Volland R (1996) Prophylaxis of migraine with oral magnesium: results from a prospective, multicentre, placebo-controlled and double blind randomized study. Cephalalgia 16:257–263
Diener HC, Rahlfs VW, Danesch U (2004) The first placebo-controlled trial of a special butterbur root extract for the prevention of migraine: reanalysis of efficacy criteria. Eur Neurol 51:89–97
Pittler MH, Ernst E (2004) Feverfew for preventing migraine. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):CD002286
Shuhendler AJ, Lee S, Siu M et al (2009) Efficacy of botulinum toxin type A for the prophylaxis of episodic migraine headaches: a meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. Pharmacotherapy 29(7):784–789
Aurora SK, Dodick DW, Turkel CC et al (2010) OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: results from the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase of the PREEMPT 1 trial. Cephalalgia 30(7):793–803
Diener HC, Dodick DW, Aurora SK et al (2010) OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: results from the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase of the PREEMPT 2 trial. Cephalalgia 30(7):804–814
Dodick DW, Turkel CC, DeGryse RE et al (2010) OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: pooled results from the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phases of the PREEMPT clinical program. Headache 50(6):921–936
Hauge AW, Asghar MS, Schytz HW et al (2009) Effects of tonabersat on migraine with aura: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study. Lancet Neurol 8(8):718–723
Pringsheim T, Davenport WJ, Dodick D (2008) Acute treatment and prevention of menstrually related migraine headache: evidence-based review. Neurology 70(17):1555–1563
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barbanti, P., Aurilia, C., Egeo, G. et al. Migraine prophylaxis: what is new and what we need?. Neurol Sci 32 (Suppl 1), 111–115 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-011-0526-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-011-0526-3