Abstract
This essay introduces a collection of articles that explore the future of groundwater-based agriculture in the Mediterranean from an interdisciplinary perspective, in a context of declining water tables due to intensive groundwater use. The imminent crisis that many groundwater economies face due to very rapid and intense global change may have severe irreversible social, economic and environmental consequences, but could also be the opportunity to make a clear break with current agricultural development models and move towards more sustainable agricultural practices. The Mediterranean region is, therefore, an interesting case for the future of intensive groundwater use, as innovative ideas and practices may emerge and inspire similar groundwater-based agricultural systems around the world.
Résumé
Cet essai présente une collection d’articles qui explorent l’avenir de l’agriculture basée sur les eaux souterraines en Méditerranée à partir d’une perspective interdisciplinaire, dans un contexte de déclin des nappes en raison d’une utilisation intensive des eaux souterraines. La crise imminente à laquelle de nombreuses économies basées sur les eaux souterraines sont confrontées à cause d’un changement global rapide et intense peut avoir des conséquences sociales, économiques et environnementales graves et irréversibles, mais pourrait aussi être l’occasion de rompre avec les modèles actuels de développement agricole et d'aller vers des pratiques agricoles plus durables. La région méditerranéenne est donc un cas intéressant pour l’avenir de l’utilisation intensive des eaux souterraines, car des idées et des pratiques novatrices peuvent émerger et inspirer des systèmes agricoles similaires dans le monde.
Resumen
Este ensayo presenta una colección de artículos que exploran el futuro de la agricultura basada en agua subterránea en el Mediterráneo desde una perspectiva interdisciplinaria, en un contexto de profundización de la capa freática debido al uso intensivo de agua subterránea. La inminente crisis que enfrentan muchas economías del agua subterránea debido a un muy rápido e intenso cambio global puede tener graves e irreversibles consecuencias sociales, económicas y ambientales, pero también podría ser la oportunidad de romper con los actuales modelos de desarrollo agrícola y avanzar hacia prácticas agrícolas más sostenibles. La región mediterránea es, por lo tanto, un caso interesante para un futuro del uso intensivo del agua subterránea, ya que ideas y prácticas innovadoras pueden surgir e inspirar similares sistemas agrícolas basados en agua subterránea en todo el mundo.
摘要
本文介绍了一系列专题论文,这些论文从跨学科角度探讨了地中海地区在大量利用地下水导致水位下降的背景下基于地下水的农业的未来状况。由于快速的、全球剧烈变化,许多地下水经济面临的迫在眉睫的危机可能造成严重的、不可挽回的社会、经济和环境后果,但是同时也为摆脱目前农业发展模式及实施更加可持续的农业生产提供了机会。因此,地中海地区是广泛利用地下水的一个很有趣的案例,因为创新理念及实践可能会出现,并对世界其它地方的类似基于地下水的农业系统带来启发。
Resumo
Este ensaio apresenta uma coleção de artigos que exploram o futuro da agricultura baseada em águas subterrâneas no Mediterrâneo sob uma perspectiva interdisciplinar, em um contexto de declínio de níveis freáticos devido ao uso intensivo das águas subterrâneas. A iminente crise que muitas economias de águas subterrâneas enfrentam devido a uma mudança global muito rápida e intensa pode ter consequências sociais, econômicas e ambientais graves e irreversíveis, mas também pode ser a oportunidade de fazer uma clara ruptura com os atuais modelos de desenvolvimento agrícola e avançar para práticas agrícolas mais sustentáveis. A região do Mediterrâneo é, portanto, um caso interessante para o futuro do uso intensivo de águas subterrâneas à medida que ideias e práticas inovadoras possam surgir e inspirar sistemas agrícolas semelhantes, baseados em águas subterrâneas, em todo o mundo.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction: revealing the fragility of groundwater-based agriculture
Groundwater is a major component of human development, especially in areas where the marked seasonality and the inter-annual variability of rain distribution are a severe constraint on agriculture. Despite being exploited for millennia, groundwater is still often a hidden resource. It took decades for hydrogeologists to make it more visible and to pinpoint the vulnerability of groundwater systems to global change (Gleeson et al. 2012). Climate variability affects groundwater dynamics, but the various forms of anthropization are more important drivers of immediate hydrological changes, including changes in land use and vegetation or agricultural practices (e.g. increased use of fertilizers and pesticides), the construction of dams, and intensive pumping (Leduc et al. 2017, this issue). The apparent abundance of groundwater and its relative ease of access have led to numerous cases of critical water table decline and groundwater shortage, particularly in semi-arid regions (Wada et al. 2010). Such crises have called public attention to the fragility of groundwater resources and to the need for more sustainable management.
In parallel, the political, social and economic importance of groundwater-based agriculture worldwide has become visible over the past decades. More than a third of the world’s irrigated area (113 out of 300 million ha) is fed with groundwater thanks to millions of wells and tube-wells (Siebert et al. 2010). Flexible use of groundwater allows the intensification and diversification of cropping systems, strengthens farmers’ economic conditions, and is usually available at relatively low cost (Bouarfa and Kuper 2012). Intensive groundwater use thus led to the development of a ‘vibrant wealth-creating agriculture’, referred to as the groundwater economy (Shah 2009). Interestingly, within this strand of literature, the signs of a coming crisis due to groundwater overdraft have also been pinpointed. Likewise, most groundwater users are well aware of this and some even anticipate their exit from groundwater-based agriculture (Bekkar et al. 2009). Groundwater overexploitation is therefore no longer an issue only recognized by specialists, but has become common discourse among users, government agencies and international donors. It has become so common that confusion persists as to what overexploitation really is (Custodio 2002), how it began, who is affected by it, and what the implications of groundwater overexploitation represent for the resource and for the users who depend on it.
Hence, the objective of this topical collection is to explore the future of groundwater-based agriculture in a general context of concern about declining water tables. This collection of interdisciplinary articles concerns the Mediterranean region, with a particular focus on North Africa, due to the intensive development of groundwater use and the very rapid and intense environmental, political, social and economic changes that have already taken place and are still underway. Groundwater-based agriculture in North Africa, like elsewhere in the Mediterranean region, has expanded at a remarkable pace—for example in Algeria, irrigated land increased from 228,000 ha in 1985 to slightly over a million ha in 2011 thanks to groundwater (Kuper et al. 2016). The general expansion of groundwater-based agriculture affects the whole range of Mediterranean aquifers, whatever their size, renewal rate and intensity of exploitation. This is true for the large Saharan sedimentary basins, which are among the biggest aquifers in the world (MacDonald et al. 2012), but whose recharge rate is much lower than current pumping rates. This is also true for other regional aquifers located closer to the Mediterranean Sea that are smaller in size but whose recharge is higher. Among them, coastal aquifers are particularly threatened by the seawater intrusion that is caused by intensified pumping.
Groundwater overexploitation: beyond the groundwater budget
The term ‘groundwater overexploitation’ is widely used to qualify any water table decline or deterioration of groundwater quality. It is frequently assumed that groundwater overexploitation has a consensual definition in the community of hydrogeologists, which is actually not the case. Groundwater overexploitation is not only related to the imbalance of the water budget (see for instance the discussion on the so-called water budget myth in Bredehoeft 2002). The concept extends well beyond hydrogeological considerations because it is related to all prejudicial effects of groundwater exploitation. Resource specialists, institutions and users perceive these effects differently and their perceptions change over time. Some scholars therefore suggested that an “aquifer is overexploited when the balance between the benefits and costs of a certain level of groundwater abstraction is negative considering long-term values” (Hernandez-Mora et al. 2001). Groundwater overexploitation often embodies complex situations, in which the decline in the water table is interlinked with a decline in water quality and unequal access to groundwater or where the state juggles with conflicting objectives, for instance, agricultural development versus environmental protection (Massuel and Riaux 2017, this issue). Conflicting objectives may lead to declaring an aquifer overexploited for environmental reasons in one place, based, for example, on the observation that rivers or springs are drying up, whereas in another context with similar signs, groundwater development will continue to favor agricultural dynamics. There is therefore a need to look at groundwater overexploitation from a wider interdisciplinary viewpoint by taking into account how groundwater is used and by whom.
Several difficulties await the scientist interested in exploring the future of groundwater-based agriculture in a context of declining water tables. The conceptual contribution of Mukherji and Shah (2005) advocating the use of three complementary perspectives (resource, institutional and user perspectives) to understand the challenge of sustainable groundwater management may be useful here. First, knowledge of the dynamics of aquifers in the Mediterranean region under various forms of anthropization, “whose impacts occur at multiple scales of time and space”, is heterogeneous and incomplete (Leduc et al. 2017, this issue). Developing a thorough resource perspective is even more challenging due to the “complete upheaval of groundwater exploitation in the 20th century” with the very rapid development of scattered agricultural pumping (Leduc et al. 2017). Making sure the knowledge base keeps up with the rapid pace of global change is, therefore, a major challenge.
Second, the increase in groundwater use for irrigation over the last few decades has mainly been taking place below the radar of managers and researchers (El-Agha et al. 2017, this issue). The problem is not only that tube-wells are generally neither registered nor monitored by state services, but also that groundwater use is largely driven by informal arrangements with little direct state involvement. This does not mean that the role of the state in current groundwater use dynamics is not important. Quite the contrary, in the Mediterranean region, the state often actively encourages groundwater-based agriculture (Kuper et al. 2016). However, the influence and role of the state cannot be determined solely on the basis of formal state-sanctioned rules, but rather by analyzing the interface of formal regulations and informal practices of groundwater use. An institutional perspective on groundwater use will, therefore, have to focus on field-based evidence of the (in)formal institutional arrangements under which the resource is appropriated and used.
Third, individual groundwater withdrawals, the main groundwater outputs, are closely linked to irrigation practices, which are themselves driven by countless factors, including land use, the farmers’ underlying logic, access to natural resources, public policies and markets (Massuel et al. 2017, this issue). It was shown, for example, in a case study in North Africa, that the irrigation volumes applied by two farmers growing the same crop can vary in the ratio of one to four (Benouniche et al. 2014). Simply counting the number of tube-wells or determining the land use to estimate groundwater use is therefore insufficient. Adopting a user perspective makes it possible to investigate the behavior of groundwater users. This is obviously time consuming, but appears to be the only way to understand current and future trends of groundwater use in relation to complex aquifer dynamics. A user perspective also allows pinpointing some of the larger issues of social justice and rural development (Hoogesteger and Wester 2015).
On the difficulty of preparing for a decline in groundwater-based agricultural systems
The contributions of this topical collection provide insights into the current dilemma facing the different actors of the groundwater economy in the Mediterranean region. As the title of their paper somewhat provocatively suggests, Petit et al. (2017, this issue) raise the specter of the possible ‘collapse’ of groundwater economies with severe and irreversible social, economic and environmental consequences. However, collapse can also pave the way for new opportunities and changes, for example downscaling farming systems with a particularly large water footprint, which is why it is important to prepare for collapse. This result is of interest beyond the Mediterranean, as an increasing number of semi-arid regions in the world are confronted with the decline and possible collapse of existing groundwater economies (see for instance Leblanc et al. (2012) on the Murray-Darling basin in Australia or Massuel et al. (2013) on the Krishna basin in India).
Yet, there are several difficulties involved in preparing for the decline of groundwater-based agriculture. The first is that informal groundwater economies are often invisible to policy makers. Revealing how a groundwater economy is working, and for whom, is certainly one important contribution of this collection of articles. For instance, Lejars et al. (2017, this issue) underline from an institutional perspective the important role of supply chain actors in the development of groundwater irrigation; they advocate involving these actors in groundwater governance as “vectors of innovations leading to more sustainable agricultural practices”. Ameur et al. (2017, this issue) show that groundwater use is generally lumped in a single figure, groundwater abstraction, whereas a decline in water tables always has social consequences—in this case, the progressive exclusion of smallholders from groundwater use, which, in turn, favors groundwater overexploitation. Ameur et al. (2017, this issue) plead for a user perspective to groundwater use by identifying the relative contributions of different social categories of farmers to groundwater overexploitation. Thus, the rampant inequalities associated with groundwater use can be revealed, possibly also enabling those in charge of regulating groundwater use to better deal with the problem.
The second difficulty is the widespread view of researchers and policy makers on resource overexploitation as only a matter of (hydrological) inputs/outputs. The different contributions in this topical collection show that a change in perspective when analyzing resource overexploitation is helpful, as the classical view of overexploitation masks the different problems faced by the different stakeholders. This includes difficulties in accessing water, problems the authorities face in controlling a territory and individual abstraction practices, and complications for scientists qualifying hydrological situations (Massuel and Riaux 2017, this issue). Although the decline of groundwater-based agriculture may be linked to degradation in the quantity or quality of the resource, it may also be linked to socio-economic factors, in particular risky and volatile agricultural markets (Lejars et al. 2017, this issue), or to political intervention and heavy-handed regulation (Petit et al. 2017, this issue). An aquifer can therefore be considered as overexploited because of many prejudicial aspects, but in the absence of an immediate threat to the resource (Massuel and Riaux 2017, this issue).
The third difficulty is related to the scant knowledge of aquifer dynamics, linked to the socio-economic and political pathways of groundwater-based agricultural systems in the Mediterranean region. Monitoring these very diverse systems is a tough task given the pace and the complexity of the physical heterogeneity of basic processes and fluxes, the multiple interactions between natural and anthropogenic processes (Leduc et al. 2017, this issue), the limited knowledge on groundwater uses (El-Agha et al. 2017, this issue) and the difficulty of assessing individual groundwater withdrawals at regional scale (Massuel et al. 2017, this issue). The hidden nature of the underground resource, its frequent inertia to short-term shocks and the progressive deterioration of groundwater may lead to crises that extend over a longer period and attract less attention from the authorities. More skeptically, some political scientists question whether stakeholders are even interested in a knowledge-based groundwater policy in a context where users “pump water at rates that contradict the advice of groundwater scientists until the resource is exhausted. These practices reflect the assumptions of the region’s water users and governments” (Allan 2007). Informing different stakeholders on the pathways of groundwater economies and on the dynamics of aquifers on which these economies are based is, therefore, an unceasing chore that should concern both the natural and the social sciences.
Conclusion: decline as an interesting prospect for change?
There is certainly no easy way to promote alternative pathways to more sustainable groundwater-based agricultural systems in the Mediterranean region, but it is clear that such a redirection will require extending the debate far beyond the resource perspective and involving all actors, including not only direct users and managers, but also environmental lobbies and the civil society. The imminent crisis that many groundwater economies face due to global change may be an opportunity to make a clear break with current agricultural development models and move towards more sustainable agricultural practices. The Mediterranean region is, therefore, a very interesting case in point for the future of intensive groundwater use. Current dynamics should be closely monitored in the coming years, as innovative ideas and practices may emerge and inspire groundwater-based agricultural systems around the world.
References
Allan JT (2007) Rural economic transitions: groundwater uses in the Middle East and its environmental consequences. In: Giordano M, Villholth KG (eds) The agricultural groundwater revolution: opportunities and threats to development. CAB International, Cambridge, MA. USA.http://www.cabi.org/cabebooks/ebook/20073043531. Accessed April 2017, pp 63–78
Ameur F, Amichi H, Kuper M, Hammani A (2017) Specifying the differentiated contribution of farmers to groundwater depletion in two irrigated areas in North Africa. Hydrogeol J. doi:10.1007/s10040-017-1569-1
Bekkar Y, Kuper M, Errahj M, Faysse N, Gafsi M (2009) On the difficulty of managing an invisible resource: farmers’ strategies and perceptions of groundwater use, field evidence from Morocco. Irrig Drain 58(S3):252–263
Benouniche M, Kuper M, Hammani A, Boesveld H (2014) Making the user visible: analysing irrigation practices and farmers’ logic to explain actual drip irrigation performance. Irrig Sci 32(6):405–420
Bouarfa S, Kuper M (2012) Groundwater in irrigation systems: from menace to mainstay. Irrig Drain 61(S1):1–13
Bredehoeft JD (2002) The water budget myth revisited: why hydrogeologists model. Ground Water 40(4):340–345
Custodio E (2002) Aquifer overexploitation: what does it mean? Hydrogeol J 10(2):254–277
El-Agha DE, Closas A, Molle F (2017) Below the radar: the boom of groundwater use in the central part of the Nile Delta in Egypt. Hydrogeol J. doi:10.1007/s10040-017-1570-8
Gleeson T, Wada Y, Bierkens MF, van Beek LP (2012) Water balance of global aquifers revealed by groundwater footprint. Nature 488(7410):197–200
Hernandez-Mora N, Llamas R, Cortina LM (2001) Misconceptions in aquifer over-exploitation: implications for water policy in Southern Europe. In: Dosi C (ed) Agricultural use of groundwater. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 107–126
Hoogesteger J, Wester P (2015) Intensive groundwater use and (in) equity: processes and governance challenges. Environ Sci Pol 51:117–124
Kuper M, Faysse N, Hammani A, Hartani T, Marlet S, Hamamouche MF, Ameur F (2016) Liberation or anarchy? The Janus nature of groundwater use on North Africa’s new irrigation frontiers. In: Jakeman AJ, Barreteau O, Hunt RJ, Rinaudo JD, Ross A (eds) Integrated groundwater management. Springer International Publishing AG, Cham, pp 583–615
Leblanc M, Tweed S, Van Dijk A, Timbal B (2012) A review of historic and future hydrological changes in the Murray-Darling Basin. Glob Planet Chang 80:226–246
Leduc C, Pulido-Bosch A, Remini B (2017) Anthropization of groundwater resources in the Mediterranean region: processes and challenges. Hydrogeol J. doi:10.1007/s10040-017-1572-6
Lejars C, Daoudi A, Amichi H (2017) The key role of supply chain actors in groundwater irrigation development in North Africa. Hydrogeol J. doi:10.1007/s10040-017-1571-7
MacDonald AM, Bonsor HC, Dochartaigh BÉÓ, Taylor RG (2012) Quantitative maps of groundwater resources in Africa. Environ Res Lett 7(2), 024009
Massuel S, George BA, Venot JP, Bharati L, Acharya S (2013) Improving assessment of groundwater-resource sustainability with deterministic modelling: a case study of the semi-arid Musi sub-basin, South India. Hydrogeol J 21(7):1567–1580
Massuel S, Amichi F, Ameur F, Calvez R, Jenhaoui Z, Bouarfa S, Kuper M, Habaieb H, Hartani T, Hammani A (2017) Considering groundwater use to improve the assessment of groundwater pumping for irrigation in North Africa. Hydrogeol J. doi:10.1007/s10040-017-1573-5
Massuel S, Riaux J (2017) Groundwater overexploitation: why is the red flag waved? Case study on the Kairouan plain aquifer. Hydrogeol J. doi:10.1007/s10040-017-1568-2
Mukherji A, Shah T (2005) Groundwater socio-ecology and governance: a review of institutions and policies in selected countries. Hydrogeol J 13(1):328–345
Petit O, Kuper M, López-Gunn E, Rinaudo J-D, Daoudi A, Lejars C (2017) Can agricultural groundwater economies collapse? An inquiry into the pathways of four groundwater economies under threat. Hydrogeol J. doi:10.1007/s10040-017-1567-3
Shah T (2009) Taming the anarchy: groundwater governance in South Asia. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC
Siebert S, Burke J, Faures JM, Frenken K, Hoogeveen J, Doll P, Portmann FT (2010) Groundwater use for irrigation: a global inventory. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 14:1863–1880
Wada Y, van Beek LP, van Kempen CM, Reckman JW, Vasak S, Bierkens MF (2010) Global depletion of groundwater resources. Geophys Res Lett 37(20), L20402
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is part of the topical collection “Groundwater-based agriculture in the Mediterranean”
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kuper, M., Leduc, C., Massuel, S. et al. Topical Collection: Groundwater-based agriculture in the Mediterranean. Hydrogeol J 25, 1525–1528 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-017-1598-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-017-1598-9