Abstract
Streambed vertical hydraulic conductivity (K v) is a key parameter in the analysis of interactions between streams and aquifers, and of stream ecosystems. However, knowledge of the streambed hydraulic conductivity associated with different stream morphologies is relatively scarce. An in-situ standpipe permeameter test method was used to determine the spatial variability in streambed K v measured along 18.5 km of stream reach in the Beiluo River, Shaanxi Province, China. The 59 total measurements were conducted at four test sites in three different stream morphologies: straight channel, anabranching channels and a nearby meander bend. There was great spatial variability in K v among the four test sites and three K v distribution patterns can be determined: (1) higher K v values appear on the erosional bank in contrast to lower K v values on the depositional bank at the two sites near meander bends; (2) the K v distribution in straight channels shows that the higher K v values occur in the center of the channel; (3) the K v values are generally highest on the branch with more alluvial forms in the anabranching channels. Moreover, grain-size analysis results illustrate that the average grain-size distributions of streambed sediments are significantly different on each side of the channel. The erosional and depositional forms are one of the driving dynamics for the distribution of streambed grain size that trigger the differences in the distribution of the K v.
Résumé
La conductivité hydraulique verticale du lit d’un cours d’eau (K v) est un paramètre clé dans l’analyse des interactions entre cours d’eau et aquifères, et des écosystèmes fluviaux associés. Cependant, la connaissance de la conductivité hydraulique du lit d’un cours d’eau, associée à différentes morphologies d’écoulements, est assez rare. Une méthode d’essai in-situ au perméamètre a été utilisée pour déterminer la variabilité spatiale de K v dans le lit d’un cours d’eau, mesurée sur un tronçon d’une longueur de 18.5 km de la rivière Beiluo, dans la province de Shaanxi, en Chine. Les 59 mesures au total ont été réalisées sur quatre sites tests situés au niveau de trois morphologies d’écoulement différentes: une zone d’écoulement rectiligne, un réseau anastomosé et une zone de méandre à proximité d’un coude. Il y a eu une grande variabilité spatiale de la valeur K v au droit des quatre sites tests et trois modèles de distribution de K v peuvent être déterminés: (1) les valeurs les plus élevées de K v apparaissent sur la rive soumise à l’érosion, à l’opposé des valeurs de K v plus faibles qui sont rencontrées sur la rive soumise aux dépôts (pour les deux sites proches des méandres); (2) la distribution du paramètre K v au droit des zones d’écoulement rectiligne montre que les valeurs de K v les plus élevées sont constatées au centre du cours d’eau; (3) les valeurs de K v sont généralement les plus élevées sur la partie avec le plus de formes alluviales du réseau anastomosé. De plus, les résultats de l’analyse granulométrique indiquent que les distributions moyennes de la taille des grains des sédiments du lit du cours d’eau sont significativement différentes de part et d’autre du cours d’eau. Les formes d’érosion et de dépôt sont l’une des dynamiques qui déterminent la distribution de la taille des grains du lit du cours d’eau et qui sont à l’origine des différences dans la distribution de K v.
Resumen
La conductividad hidráulica vertical de un cauce (K v) es un parámetro clave en el análisis de las interacciones entre los ríos y acuíferos, y de los ecosistemas fluviales. Sin embargo, el conocimiento de la conductividad hidráulica del cauce asociado con diferentes morfologías de la corriente es relativamente escaso. Se utilizó como método de ensayo el permeámetro del tubo vertical para determinar la variabilidad espacial en el cauce K v medida a lo largo de un tramo de 18.5 kilometros de río en el río Beiluo, provincia de Shaanxi, China. Se llevaron a cabo un total de 59 mediciones en cuatro sitios de prueba en tres morfologías diferentes: en el canal recto, en canales ramificados y en la curva de un meandro cercano. Se reconoció una gran variabilidad espacial en K v entre los cuatro sitios de prueba y tres patrones de distribución de K v se pueden determinar: (1) Los valores de K v más altos aparecen en la orilla de erosión en contraste con valores más bajos K v en la orilla de sedimentación en los dos sitios cercanos de las curvas meandro; (2) la distribución K v en canales rectos muestra que los valores de K v más altos se producen en el centro de la canal; (3) los valores K v son generalmente más altos en la ramificación con más formas aluviales en los canales ramificados. Por otra parte, los resultados del análisis de tamaño de grano ilustran que las distribuciones de tamaño promedio de grano de los sedimentos de los cauces son significativamente diferentes en cada lado del canal. Las formas de erosión y de sedimentación constituyen los comportamientos dinámicos para la distribución de tamaño de grano en el cauce, los cuales desencadenan las diferencias en la distribución de la K v.
摘要
河床垂向渗透系数是分析河流-含水层相互作用及其河流生态系统的重要参数之一。目前对河床渗透系数与河貌类型的影响效应研究相对较少。本文采用水头下降竖管渗透试验法在北洛河4个研究点、3种不同河貌类型(弯曲河道、直河道、分叉型河道)的共59个试验点位做了垂向渗透系数测试与分析研究。结果表明:在弯曲河道,垂向渗透系数在侵蚀岸值较大,而沉积岸的值较小;在直河道,河道中间比两岸的垂向渗透系数值都大;在分叉型河道,冲蚀能力较大,垂向渗透系数较大。同时,河床平均粒径的大小在河道两岸及中间都有明显差异,河流侵蚀与沉积的过程是引起河床沉积物粒径大小分异的重要因素,从而对垂向渗透系数大小的差异起到了显著的影响作用。
Resumo
A condutividade hidráulica vertical de leito de rio (K v) é um parâmetro chave na análise de interações entre cursos d’água, aquíferos e ecossistemas de fluxo. Entretanto, a compreensão da condutividade hidráulica de leitos de rios associada à distintas morfologias de fluxo é relativamente escarça. O método de teste através de um permeâmetro vertical in-situ foi usado para determinar a variabilidade espacial de K v de leito de rio, medido ao longo de 18.5 km do fluxo no Rio Beiluo, Província de Shaanxi, China. Um total de 59 medidas foram conduzidas em quatro locais de teste em três morfologias de fluxo diferentes: canal linear, canais com ramificações e uma abertura em meandro. Houve uma grande variabilidade espacial na K v entre os quatro locais de teste e três padrões de distribuição de K v puderam ser determinados: (1) valores maiores de K v aparecem no banco erosional, em contraste com valores menores de K v nos bancos deposicionais nos dois locais próximos às aberturas em meandros; (2) a distribuição de K v em canais lineares mostra que valores de K v mais altos ocorrem no centro do canal; (3) os valores de K v são geralmente os mais altos no ramo com mais formações aluviais, nos canais com ramificação. Além disso, a análise de tamanho de grãos ilustra que as distribuições de tamanho médio de tamanho de grãos dos sedimentos do rio são significativamente diferentes em cada lado do canal. As formações erosionais e deposicionais são uma das dinâmicas forçantes para a distribuição de tamanho de grãos do leito do rio, que ocasiona as diferenças na distribuição de K v.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Accurate estimation of streambed hydraulic conductivity (K) is of significance in the analysis of the magnitude and extent of water exchange and contaminant transfer between groundwater and surface water, and is even important in dealing with a number of geotechnical problems involving the management of groundwater and surface water (Cardenas et al. 2004; Chen et al. 2008; Song et al. 2009; Sebok et al. 2014). Streambed K can be measured through a variety of approaches and techniques which have been discussed by Landon et al. (2001) and Kalbus et al. (2006). It should be taken into account, however, that each method has its own limitation because of measurement scale and field conditions (Kalbus et al. 2006; Min et al. 2013). It is known that the streambed vertical hydraulic conductivity (K v) always varies spatially; some studies have revealed that the K v has large variations along a river transect (perpendicular to the river flow direction; Chen 2005; Min et al. 2013). Streambed K v is spatially variable in a river and the occurrence of the largest K v is in the center of the stream channel (Genereux et al. 2008). Landon et al. (2001) and Chen (2005) reported that K v variation could occur on a scale as small as 3 m. In addition, even over a short distance (less than hundreds of meters), the K v can change appreciably (Chen 2004; Genereux et al. 2008). Moreover, hydraulic conductivity decreases with increasing depth according to the study results of Song et al. (2010) and Min et al. (2013).
The channel morphologic features are important factors in the analysis of the hydraulic relationship between streams and aquifers (Cardenas et al. 2004; Käser et al. 2009; Sebok et al. 2014). Hyporheic interaction is controlled by variable pressure heads in the streambed sediments and its environmental conditions (Koch et al. 2011). Stream morphologies create the pressure variations, including meanders (Nowinski et al. 2011), cobbles (Edwardson et al. 2003), bedforms (Bardini et al. 2013), riffles and pools (Käser et al. 2009), and beaver dams (Genereux et al. 2008). The across-stream gradient can be induced by flow along meander bends, which is enhanced by the natural alignment of large stream K along the direction of maximum gradient (Cardenas et al. 2004). Compared to homogeneous bedform, small-scale permeability heterogeneity produces more irregular flow patterns (Bardini et al. 2013). Downwelling and upwelling flow paths can be caused by bedform and sinuosity at small scale (1–100 m), and width and depth of bedrock at large scale (km; Malard et al. 2002). For a pool–riffle sequence, exchange between channel and hyporheic water can induce rapid downwelling at the head of riffles and varies upwelling in riffle tails (Edwardson et al. 2003). Furthermore, regional groundwater-flow attributes are predominately controlled by stream geomorphology such as channel gradient, sinuosity, width/depth ratio, streambed hydraulic conductivity and so on (Larkin and Sharp 1992). It has been reported that either bankfull cross-sectional area or bankfull width are significant for all peak discharges (Lawlor 2004). High hydraulic conductivity produces saturated subsurface flow (Irvine et al. 2012). The interaction of streams and aquifers can be enhanced by growth of meander length and reduced by decrease in river sinuosity (Boano et al. 2006). Due to the transport of fine materials, the hydraulic conductivity of shallow alluvial aquifers under condition of sinuosity-driven hyporheic flow is dynamic (Nowinski et al. 2011).
A meandering stream is one of the important sedimentological forms that connects regional aquifers and streams (Dong et al. 2012). Sebok et al. (2014) demonstrated that there are more variable streambed features in the meander bend than in the straight section. The existence of several orders of magnitude in range of streambed anisotropy values has been observed close to stream banks (Sebok et al. 2013). The water exchange in the main channel can move into slower pools by anabranch diversions, and promotes the exchange process into the subsurface (Koch et al. 2011). A combined study of the K v and erosion and deposition processes of streambed sediments has been conducted by Genereux et al. (2008) and Levy et al. (2011). Bardini et al. (2013) showed that the bedform is an important hydrologic factor impacting hyporheic water exchange. The streambed and point bars influence the process of water exchange and solute transport between streams and surrounding groundwater systems (Dong et al. 2012). Those previous studies suggested that there are many influences on hydraulic conductivity including stream morphology and geomorphology attributes, riverbed forms, erosion and deposition process, and the riverbed sediments. However, knowledge of the streambed hydraulic conductivity for different stream morphologies is relatively scarce. In the present study, the study focuses on an investigation of spatial variability in streambed K v spanning 18.5 km of stream reach in the Beiluo River, Shaanxi Province, China. An in-situ field standpipe permeameter was utilized to collect 59 total measurements using 4 test sites in 3 stream morphologies (one in the straight stream channel, one in anabranching channels and two near distinctive meander bends). All sediment samples were collected after the K v tests and they were used for grain-size analysis.
The objectives of this study were to (1) investigate spatial variability in streambed hydraulic conductivity (2) determine the links between this variability and stream morphologies, bedforms and water depth, and (3) analyze the relationship between the distribution of vertical hydraulic conductivity and the sediment grain size.
Study area
The field study was conducted in the Beiluo River, which is one of the tributaries of the Weihe River, and is a meandering stream located in Shaanxi Province, China. The river system has a feather-like distribution with a total length of 680.3 km, and the total area of the Beiluo River Basin is approximately 26.9 km2. It covers two Chinese topographic regions, the Loess Plateau and the Guanzhong Basin. Its flow is from northwest to southeast and empties into the Weihe River. The study area is located in a continental monsoon climate area and has a mean annual precipitation of 541.7 mm and a mean temperature of 13.2 °C. Seasonal variations in precipitation are distinctive and non-uniform. The majority of floods occur from July to October. The river system has a stream gradient of 1.98 ‰ and the average stream flow is 14.99 m3/s. This area is in the transition region between the Loess Plateau and the Guanzhong Basin. The streambed sediment is alluvial loess sandy clay and sand-gravel stratum of Pliocene and Holocene Epoch. Meandering channel morphologies occur because of the change from an erosional regime to a depositional regime.
The Beiluo River is an important local river that provides water supplies for agricultural activities and human consumption (Zhang et al. 2007). However, because of a long history of wastewater drainage and platform runoff from nearby rapidly developed petroleum industries, the natural environmental systems have been affected. In this process, the Beiluo River has received contaminants and has been influenced by the input of a large amount of organic matter and heavy metals (Shi et al. 2008). Furthermore, the annual average amount of runoff for the Beiluo River has markedly decreased, especially from spring to autumn, during the period from 1964 to 2008 (Dong et al. 2014). Therefore, determination of the hydraulic conductivity of the Beiluo River’s riverbed is essential for estimating the water discharge from groundwater into rivers and the management of water resources.
Field measurements were conducted in an 18.5 km section of the Beiluo River at the meander bend 1 (MB1) site, anabranching channel (AC) site, straight channel (SC) site, meander bend 2 (MB2) site. The stream flows from north to south with many sharp bends in the channel. Because of those bends, one stream bank is being eroded, while depositional processes occur at the other bank and those processes have resulted in steep banks that project 0.5–4 m above the stream. Both stream banks are covered with trees and shrubs and the surrounding environment is covered with cultivated fields. It can be hypothesized that the composition of sediment particles may have significant difference among test sites, which can induce considerable distinctive spatial variability of K v.
All sites were suitable for conducting the field experiments to establish the relationship between spatial variability of streambed hydraulic conductivity and differences in stream morphologies. All in all, the distribution of 60 measurements at 4 test sites in different stream morphologies (Fig. 1) was determined. In the field study, the testing points were determined by the submerged streambed width and river-water depth (Fig. 2). The distribution of test sites in MB1 is different from other sites because the stream velocity was relatively high and the water is deeper on the left bank (Table 1). Measured points were labeled by a letter (L, C, R, R1 or R2) to indicate left side, center, or right side of the channel (Fig. 2). Because the first test location along the stream flow for left side of MB1 site was inundated by stream water in the afternoon (Fig. 2a), the value for this point was discarded in this study.
Methods
Vertical hydraulic conductivity
A field permeameter method for measuring vertical hydraulic conductivity has been applied and discussed in previous studies (Chen 2005; Genereux et al. 2008; Song et al. 2010; Dong et al. 2012). This method is used to determine the streambed hydraulic conductivity (K v) by inserting a pipe vertically into the streambed (Fig. 3), filling the pipe with water, and measuring the rate of decline of the water level inside the pipe. After doing this several times the K v can be calculated from this rate. In this study, polyvinyl chloride pipe with an inner diameter of 5.4 cm and length 160 cm was used. The pipe was inserted into the streambed sediments, ensuring that the length of the sediment column was approximately 40 cm. A measuring tape was used to measure water levels, with accuracy of 1 mm. A track level bar was used to ensure that the pipe is vertical. During the test, water was added at the top open end of the pipe to form a hydraulic head. The head was then allowed to fall in the pipe. During the water-level falling process (inside the pipe) for each permeameter test, hydraulic head measurements were collected at regular intervals. In this study, hydraulic head and time were recorded at a water-level declining interval of 1 cm, and hydraulic head measurements were collected more than 5 times. Any pairs of measured data of hydraulic head and time were used to calculate the K v value using the equation of Hvorslev (1951).
where D is the inner diameter of the pipe, m is the square root of the ratio of the horizontal conductivity K h to the vertical conductivity K v (i.e., \( m=\sqrt{K_{\mathrm{h}}/{K}_{\mathrm{v}}} \)), L v is the length of the sediment column, h 1 and h 2 are hydraulic head inside the pipe measured at times t 1 and t 2, respectively. Generally, K h is larger than K v. A modified Hvorslev solution has been developed by Chen (2004) and Song et al.(2009) to determine the K v when L v is much larger than D:
However, the error in K v from the formula provided by the modified Hvorslev equation (Eq. 2) is linked to the ratio (L v /D) of the measured sediment length (L v) to the inner diameter (D) of the polyvinyl chloride pipe. When 1 < m < 5, if the ratio (L v /D) is larger than 5, the error of the modified calculation will be less than 5 % (Chen 2004). For this reason, the appropriate inner diameter and measured sediment column length should be selected carefully. In this study, the length of the measurements of sediment column in the in-situ permeameter tests ranged from 37.5 to 48.1 cm and the inner diameter of the sediment column was 5.4 cm, so the ratio L v /D was greater than 5, ensuring a relatively small error using these measurements.
Bedform
Bedforms reflect not only the influence of the different stream morphologies on the riverbank and the degree of erosion and deposition, but also correspond well with the water depth. Chen (2005) and Min et al. (2013) explained that the K v has a positive correlation with the water depth. The Topcon GTS-102 N Construction Total Station was used to collect the data to detect the bedform. The detection of angle is by 2 horizontal and 1 vertical, and the prism mode-of-measurement accuracy is ±(2 mm + 2 ppm × D) mean squared error (MSE). The maximum range is 2,000 m. The data processing for spatial analysis was performed using ArcGIS 10.0 (Genereux et al. 2008).
Sediment sampling and grain-size analysis
The sediment samples were collected after the completion of the K v test. The top opening of the pipe was sealed using a rubber cap to disconnect the pipe from the atmosphere, and then the pipe with the sediment column inside was pulled out. This procedure prevented sediments from exiting at the bottom end of the pipe (Song et al. 2009). The sediments were placed into labeled sampling bags after the water was poured out. Ultimately, the sediment samples were used for grain-size analyses in a laboratory at Northwest University, China. The sieving method was used. After the samples were dry, each sample was poured into a roto-tap for shaking and was separated into 13 grades. The finest sieve size was 0.075 mm and the coarsest one was 10 mm. Particle sizes <0.075 mm were classified as silt and clay for this study, particle sizes of 0.075–2.0 mm as sand, and particle size >2.0 mm as gravel (Song et al. 2010).
Results and discussion
Spatial variability of K v
The K v values of the total of 59 measurements covered 4 orders of magnitude, from 0.01 to 26.9 m/d (Table 2; Fig. 4), which is within the range of K v values reported by a number of researchers (Genereux et al. 2008; Min et al. 2013) for studies conducted in sediment-laden alluvial rivers that are similar to Beiluo River.
Generally, the K v values are highest on the right erosional bank and the lowest K v values occur close to the depositional bank at the sites MB1 (Fig. 2a) and MB2 (Fig. 2g). At the SC site, the K v values are higher in the center of the channel (Fig. 2e). This result was consistent with the research results of Genereux et al. (2008) for West Bear Creek (USA), which suggested that the greatest K v generally occurs in the center of the channel. In the anabranching channels, the sand bar in the center, on its upstream end, divides the stream into two parts which leads to different patterns of K v distribution than at the other sites. The K v values are generally higher on the right side, and smaller K v values appear on the left bank (Fig. 2c).
The values for the coefficient of variation for each test site are 1.27, 0.82, 1.21 and 0.92 (Table 2), for MB1, AC, SC, and MB2 respectively. The values indicate that streambed attributes are more variable at the MB1 site than those close to the meander bend. This may be because of the more dynamic environment at MB1, which has the greatest water velocity and average channel width (Table 1) and the greatest erosion and deposition of the streambed (Fig. 2). There is more variability in streambed materials there, including more silt/clay compared to the lower coefficient of variation values at the AC site that has more sand and gravel (Table 3). Chen (2005) reported that the coefficient of variation values in sediments with more silt/clay is larger than in sediments containing mostly sand and gravels.
In the results of this study, the streambed K v distribution showed great spatial variability for each test site and that K v distribution could be linked to the differences in grain size in streambed sediments as discussed by Song et al. (2010). Sebok et al. (2014) found that streambed attributes in the meander bend were more variable than in the straight channel. Dong et al. (2012) reported that the K v values in point bars were lower than those in the streambed. Käser et al. (2009) studied the potential relationship between K and geomorphology in a riffle-step-pool sequence and showed that the mean value of hydraulic conductivity is smaller in the pool than in the riffle, which might be related to excess fine sediments settling preferentially in pools where stream velocity was lower. Other studies showed that the variability of K v values was related to the erosion and deposition of streambed sediments (Genereux et al. 2008; Levy et al. 2011) and regional variations in streambed characteristics, including sedimentary texture and sedimentary structure (Leek et al. 2009; Min et al. 2013). Therefore, streambed sediment grain size, which in turn can be related to different stream morphologies, bedforms, and erosional and depositional regimes, correlates with K v values.
Each test site has a different stream morphology. SC is located in a straight stream channel that is broader and straighter than the channel at the AC site (Table 1; Fig. 2). Among all the test sites, the water velocity and water depth are the lowest at the SC site (Table 1). In particular, there is a sand bar with a 20 m length near the bridge pier, and this structure leads to a division of the stream flow into two channels.
At the MB1 site, it is shown that the erosional process increases from the right bank to left bank in the K v measurement area (Fig. 2b). The streambed profile at the MB2 site is opposite that of the MB1 site (Fig. 2h). At the SC site, the lowest streambed elevation occurs on the right bank and towards the center of the channel, which suggests that the erosion process is mainly concentrated in the center of the channel towards the right side (Fig. 2f). The elevation on the left bank is relatively higher at the AC site. This indicates that the majority of erosional locations are on the right bank of the channel (Fig. 2d). The configuration of this stream, which is characterized by anabranching, is mainly controlled by one or two major anabranches because such structures result in the greatest transport efficiency (Huang and Nanson 2007).
The study shows that distinctive stream morphologies have resulted in bedforms that correspond to erosion and deposition of the channel at each test site. Those contrasting erosion and deposition patterns led to different sediment distributions and spatial variability for K v values at each test site (Fig. 5; Table 3), whereas the erosional side likely has greater grain size contrast because of depositional conditions. Such are the reasons for hydraulic conductivity variability and the spatial distribution patterns.
Correlation between K v and water depth
Statistical analyses of K v values (Table 2; Fig. 2) and the mean of water depth (Table 1) calculated from the mean of L/C/R (R1/R2) positions generally suggest that deeper water depth corresponds to higher K v values. Spearman Bivariate Correlation analysis was used to verify whether two non-normally distributed variables are significantly correlated at the 95 % confidence level. However, when all the data from correlation coefficients between water depth and the vertical hydraulic conductivity are taken into account for each test site, the correlation coefficients for sites MB1, AC, SC, and MB2 were 0.55, 0.44, −0.24 and 0.15, respectively. The results for MB1, SC, and MB2 revealed that the correlation is not significant at the 95 % confidence level. Although the relationship between K v and water depth was not as significant as expected and the correlation coefficient was negative in SC, a lower K v value at these study sites often occurred in the part of the channel with the shallower bank. This is consistent with what was reported in the publication by Min et al. (2013).
In general, where there is more rapid flow, there is deeper water and greater flow strength, both of which could result in coarser sediments (Min et al. 2013). However, these results show that there is insignificant correlation between K v and water depth. It must be taken into account, however, that the time interval spent at the test sites spanned only 10 days. Time and active channel reworking of sediment have great influence on the distribution of K v. In dynamic streams where sediments are constantly reworked, the hydraulic conductivity changes with time as the sediments are reworked and as the weight of overlying sediments increases or decreases the shear stress. Also, when making the measurements at the MB1 site, the water rose about 5 cm in the afternoon. There was also pumping taking place on the right bank downstream of SC and MB2. These may be the reasons for temporary changes of the water depth. The measurements of water depth represent the water flow conditions only at the time of testing. However, the sediments in the channel that were used to test streambed hydraulic conductivity were deposited over a long period of time (Chen 2005). Therefore, the hydraulic conductivity is not evidenced by a snapshot in time of the current water depth.
Grain size analysis
Erosional areas mainly occur in the central channel towards the right at site SC; the erosional bank is located on the right side of the channel at the AC site. The highest average median grain size of d 50 and lowest average value of cumulative percentage in weight of silt and clay was in the central part at SC and the right side at AC, respectively. It has been demonstrated that erosion and deposition near a meander bend would result in different grain size distributions of streambed sediments at sites MB1 and MB2. For streambed sediments (Fig. 5) from each test site along the Beiluo River, the average value of cumulative percentage in weight for particle size diameter <0.075 mm (silt and clay) increases from the erosional to depositional side at the MB1 (L/C/R1/R2) and MB2 (L/C/R) sites. Conversely, the average median grain size decreases from the erosional to depositional side at the MB1 and MB2 sites (Table 3). This evidence supports the previous view of the Beiluo River: stream morphology, bedform pattern, and contrasting erosional and depositional conditions are the driving factors impacting the distribution of riverbed sediments. This difference in sediment distribution can lead to spatial variability of K v for each test site. In particular, the grain size distribution at MB1 is significantly different from the other sites and indicates more sediment mixing, and, consequently, higher variability coefficients for K v.
Grain size is a main controlling factor for streambed hydraulic conductivity (Song et al. 2010). The average grain size distributions of streambed sediments have significant differences at each position of the channel at all tested sites (Fig. 5). Comparing the statistics and distributions of K v values (Table 2; Fig. 2) collected from permeameter tests at each position L/C/R (R1/R2) at all test sites, it is evident that a higher average median grain size of d 50, and a lower average value of cumulative percentage in weight of silt and clay (<0.075 mm) correlate with higher hydraulic conductivity. The vertical hydraulic conductivity of channel sediments has a wide range of distribution; a difference of five orders of magnitude in K v exists between silt-clay and sand-gravel sediments (Chen et al. 2008). Roque and Didier (2006) have studied the relationship between hydraulic conductivity and the weight of clay and silt contained in sediments under three different conditions. Their results show that there is a negative exponential relationship for both clay and silt. However, for site AC, the average value of cumulative percentage in weight with silt and clay at the left side was less than that at the central part, but that side had lower hydraulic conductivity. Therefore, in the Beiluo River streambed, the distribution of streambed K v is not just controlled by the change of grain size. Sedimentary structures (Leek et al. 2009), clogging sediment (Song et al. 2010), and hyporheic processes between stream water and groundwater (Nowinski et al. 2011) may also influence hydraulic conductivity there.
Generally, where the porosity is larger, the grain size is larger, the water flow channel is relatively smooth, and the hydraulic conductivity is larger. In fact, Song et al. (2009) have developed an empirical formula relating the hydraulic conductivity and grain size. For example, grain size data have been used to deduce K v values based on the Shepherd equation (K v = Cd 50 1.65 where C is a dimensionless coefficient, Shepherd 1989). This equation focuses on particle diameter at 50 % of cumulative weight of sediment, which shows that there is a positive relationship between grain size and hydraulic conductivity (Song et al. 2009). The results generated by this formula provide corroboration for the present study.
Conclusions
In this report, an in-situ permeameter test method was applied to determine the spatial variability in streambed K v in an 18.5 km stream reach in the Beiluo River. Collectively, the data from 59 measurements at 4 test sites were analyzed. There were three different stream morphologies: straight channel, anabranching channels, and two distinctive meander bends. Each test site had great spatial variability in K v and different K v distributions.
The K v distribution at four test sites could be divided into three patterns—at the two sites near meander bends, the K v values are generally highest on the erosional bank and the smallest K v values occur near the depositional bank; the K v distributions in the straight channel show that the K v values are greater in the center of the river. In the anabranching channels, the K v values are generally highest on the branch with more alluvial channel features.
Distributions of riverbed morphologies from each test site along the Beiluo River showed that the stream morphology is a significant factor influencing erosional and depositional conditions and bedforms. The erosional and depositional stream hydrologic processes winnowed the sediments and mobilized the sand and other particles contained in the streambed to form deposits of different grain size. Streambed hydraulic conductivity could be directly related to the grain size. Grain size analysis results indicate that the average grain size distributions of streambed sediments have significant differences in each part L/C/R (R1/R2) of the channel at all test sites. A higher average median grain size of d 50 is found on the erosional bank and there is a generally a lower average value of cumulative percentage in weight for silt and clay.
References
Bardini L, Boano F, Cardenas MB, Sawyer AH, Revelli R (2013) Ridolfi L (2013) Small-scale permeability heterogeneity has negligible effects on nutrient cycling in streambeds. Geophys Res Lett 40(6):1118–1122. doi:10.1002/grl.50224
Boano F, Camporeale C, Revelli R, Ridolfi L (2006) Sinuosity-driven hyporheic exchange in meandering rivers. Geophys Res Lett 33(18). doi:10.1029/2006GL027630
Cardenas MB, Wilson JL, Zlotnik VA (2004) Impact of heterogeneity, bed forms, and stream curvature on subchannel hyporheic exchange,.Water Resour Res. 40. doi:10.1029/2004WR003008
Chen XH (2004) Streambed hydraulic conductivity for rivers in south-central Nebraska. J Am Water Resour As 40(3):561–573. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2004.tb04443.x
Chen XH (2005) Statistical and geostatistical features of streambed hydraulic conductivities in the Platte River, Nebraska. Environ Geol 48(6):693–701. doi:10.1007/s00254-005-0007-1
Chen XH, Burbach M, Cheng C (2008) Electrical and hydraulic vertical variability in channel sediments and its effects on streamflow depletion due to groundwater extraction. J Hydrol 352(3-4):250–266. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.01.004
Dong QG, Zhou WB, Liu L, Shu YY, Li YP (2014) Analysis of runoff variation characteristics of Beiluohe River (in Chinese). Yellow River 36(2):20–29
Dong WH, Chen XH, Wang ZW, Ou GX, Liu C (2012) Comparison of vertical hydraulic conductivity in a streambed-point bar system of a gaining stream. J Hydrol 450:9–16. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.05.037
Edwardson KJ, Bowden WB, Dahm C, Morrice J (2003) The hydraulic characteristics and geochemistry of hyporheic and parafluvial zones in Arctic tundra streams, north slope, Alaska. Adv Water Resour 26(9):907–923. doi:10.1016/S0309-1708(03)00078-2
Genereux DP, Leahy S, Mitasova H, Kennedy CD, Corbett DR (2008) Spatial and temporal variability of streambed hydraulic conductivity in West Bear Creek, North Carolina, USA. J Hydrol 358(3–4):332–353. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.06.017
Huang HQ, Nanson GC (2007) Why some alluvial rivers develop an anabranching pattern. Water Resour Res 43(7):2007. doi:10.1029/2006WR005223
Hvorslev MJ (1951) Time lag and soil permeability in ground-water observations. Waterways Experiment Station, US Army Bull 36, US Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, MI, 50 pp
Irvine DJ, Brunner P, Franssen HJ, Simmons CT (2012) Heterogeneous or homogeneous? Implications of simplifying heterogeneous streambeds in models of losing streams. J Hydrol 424:16–23. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.11.051
Kalbus E, Reinstorf F, Schirmer M (2006) Measuring methods for groundwater–surface water interactions: a review. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 10(6):873–887. doi:10.5194/hess-10-873-2006
Käser DH, Binley A, Heathwaite AL, Krause S (2009) Spatio-temporal variations of hyporheic flow in a riffle-step-pool sequence. Hydrol Process 23(15):2138–2149. doi:10.1002/hyp.7317
Koch JC, McKnight DM, Neupauer RM (2011) Simulating unsteady flow, anabranching, and hyporheic dynamics in a glacial meltwater stream using a coupled surface water routing and groundwater flow model. Water Resour Res 47(5):2011. doi:10.1029/2010WR009508
Landon MK, Rus DL, Harvey FE (2001) Comparison of instream methods for measuring hydraulic conductivity in sandy streambeds. Groundwater 39(6):870–885. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6584.2001.tb02475.x
Larkin RG, Sharp JM (1992) On the relationship between river-basin geomorphology, aquifer hydraulics, and ground-water flow direction in alluvial aquifers. Geol Soc Am Bull 104(12):1608–1620
Lawlor SM (2004) Determination of channel-morphology characteristics, bankfull discharge, and various design-peak discharges in western Montana. US Geol Surv Sci Invest Rep 2004-5263
Leek R, Wu JQ, Wang L, Hanrahan TP, Barber ME, Qiu HX (2009) Heterogeneous characteristics of streambed saturated hydraulic conductivity of the Touchet River, south eastern Washington, USA. Hydrol Process 23(8):1236–1246. doi:10.1002/hyp.7258
Levy J, Birck MD, Mutiti S, Kilroy KC, Windeler B, Idris O, Allen LN (2011) The impact of storm events on a riverbed system and its hydraulic conductivity at a site of induced infiltration. J Environ Manag 92:1960–1971. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.03.017
Malard F, Tockner K, Dole-olivier MJ, Ward JV (2002) A landscape perspective of surface–subsurface hydrological exchanges in river corridors. Freshw Biol 47(4):621–640
Min LL, Yu JJ, Liu CM, Zhu JT, Wang P (2013) The spatial variability of streambed vertical hydraulic conductivity in an intermittent river, northwestern China. Environ Earth Sci 69:873–883. doi:10.1007/s12665-012-1973-8
Nowinski JD, Cardenas MB, Lightbody AF (2011) Evolution of hydraulic conductivity in the floodplain of a meandering river due to hyporheic transport of fine materials. Geophys Res Lett 38:2011. doi:10.1029/2010GL045819
Roque AJ, Didier G (2006) Calculating hydraulic conductivity of fine-grained soils to leachates using linear expressions. Eng Geol 85(1):147–157
Sebok E, Duque C, Engesgaard P, Bøgh E (2013) Anisotropy of streambed sediments of contrasting geomorphological environments and its relation to groundwater discharge. EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, EGU2013-4529, EGU General Assembly, Vienna, April 2013
Sebok E, Duque C, Engesgaard P, Boegh E (2014) Spatial variability in streambed hydraulic conductivity of contrasting stream morphologies: channel bend and straight channel. Hydrol Process. doi:10.1002/hyp.10170
Shepherd RG (1989) Correlations of permeability and grain size. Groundwater 27(5):633–638. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6584.1989.tb00476.x
Shi HL, Zhang L, Yue LP, Zheng GZ (2008) Petroleum hydrocarbon contamination in surface sediments of Beiluohe Basins, China. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 81(4):416–421. doi:10.1007/s00128-008-9419-4
Song JX, Chen XH, Cheng C, Wang DM, Lackey S, Xu ZX (2009) Feasibility of grain-size analysis methods for determination of vertical hydraulic conductivity of streambeds. J Hydrol 375(3–4):428–437. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.043
Song JX, Chen XH, Cheng C, Wang DM, Wang WK (2010) Variability of streambed vertical hydraulic conductivity with depth along the Elkhorn River, Nebraska, USA. Chin Sci Bull 55(10):992–999. doi:10.1007/s11434-009-0640-2
Zhang L, Shi KL, Yue LP (2007) Chemical characteristics and pollution sources of petroleum hydrocarbons and PAHs in sediments from the Beiluohe River, northern China. Environ Geol 53(2):307–315. doi:10.1007/s00254-007-0645-6
Acknowledgements
This study was jointly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51079123, 51379715 and 51309107), Program for Key Science and Technology Innovation Team in Shaanxi Province (Grant No. 2014KCT-27), Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (Grant No.NCET-11-1045), the open funds from State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, Sichuan University (SKLH-OF-1212) and Program for Graduated Student Innovation Talents Training in Northwest University (Grant No. YZZ14011). We would like to thank the editor, the associate editor, and the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jiang, W., Song, J., Zhang, J. et al. Spatial variability of streambed vertical hydraulic conductivity and its relation to distinctive stream morphologies in the Beiluo River, Shaanxi Province, China. Hydrogeol J 23, 1617–1626 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-015-1288-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-015-1288-4