Abstract
Many countries have begun to look increasingly toward the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) as one of the key tools to increase the cost effectiveness of fulfilling their compliance requirements with the Kyoto Protocol. It is believed, from a theoretical point of view, that linking emissions trading schemes to the Kyoto Protocol’s flexible mechanisms can lead to a decrease in carbon prices and so a reduction of the overall compliance costs. This study provides an analysis of the relationship between the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) and the CDM. The study considers the dynamic interactions between European allowance (EUA) prices and certified emission reduction (CER) prices, and uses time-series econometric techniques to test for the existence of long-term links and causal relations between the prices. Furthermore, the generalized impulse response analysis has been used to investigate temporal interactions among the variables. The results show that CER prices do not have a statistically significant effect on EUA prices; rather, it is the EUA prices that have driven CER prices during the period investigated. The constraint on the availability of CERs emanating from supplementarity and additionality criteria, as stipulated by the Kyoto Protocol, is one of the major factors that can be hypothesized to account for this finding.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Ahman M, Burtraw D, Kruger JA, Zetterberg L (2007) The ten-year rule-allocation of emissions allowances in the EU emissions trading system. Energy Policy 35:1718–1730
Alberola E, Chevallier J, Cheze B (2008) Price drivers and structural breaks in European carbon prices 2005–07. Energy Policy 36:787–797
Anger N (2008) Emissions trading beyond Europe: linking schemes in a post-Kyoto world. Energy Economics 30:2028–2049
Anger N, Bohringer C, Moslener U (2007) Macroeconomic impacts of the CDM: the role of investment barriers and regulations. ZEW discussion paper No. 07-026, Mannheim
Benz E, Trück S (2009) Modelling the price dynamic of CO2 emission allowances. Energy Economics 31:4–15
Betz R, Rogge K, Schleich J (2006) EU emissions trading: an early analysis of national allocation plans for 2008–2012. Climate Policy 6:361–394
Böhringer C, Hoffmann T, Manrique-De-Lara-Penate C (2006) The efficiency costs of separating carbon markets under the EU emissions trading scheme: a quantitative assessment for Germany. Energy Economics 28:44–61
Christiansen AC, Wettestad J (2003) The EU as a frontrunner on greenhouse gas emissions trading: how did it happen and will the EU succeed. Climate Policy 3:3–18
Convery FJ (2009) Reflections—the emerging literature on emissions trading in Europe. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 3:121–137
Criqui P, Kitous A (2003) Impacts of linking JI and CDM credits to the EU ETS. Kyoto Protocol Implementation, KPI. Technical Report, B4-3040/2001/330760/MAR/E1
De Sepibus J (2008) Linking the EU emissions trading scheme to JI, CDM and post-2012 international offsets. NCCR Trade Regulation, Working paper no. 2008/18
Dickey DA, Fuller WA (1979) Estimation for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74:427–431
Dolado JJ, Lütkepohl H (1996) Making Wald tests work for cointegrated VAR systems. Econometric Reviews 15:369–386
European Commission (2003) Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the council amending the directive establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the community, in respect of the Kyoto Protocol’s project mechanisms, COM (2003) 403
European Commission (2006) Communication from the commission to the council and the European Parliament on the assessment of national plans for the allocation of greenhouse gas emission allow ances in the second period of the EU ETS accompanying commission decisions of 29 November 2006 on the national allocation plans of Germany etc., COM (2006) 725
European Union (EU) (2003) Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for trading in greenhouse gas emission allowances within the community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC.
European Commission, Brussels EU (2004) Directive 2004/101/EC, amending directive 2003/87/EC establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the community, in respect to Kyoto Protocol’s project mechanisms. European Commission, Brussels. http://eur-Lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/oj/2004/1_338/1_33820041113en00180023.pdf.
Cited EU (2008) Directive 2008/101/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008.
Official Journal of the European Union EU (2009) Directive 2009/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009.
Official Journal of the European Union Johansen S (1988) Statistical analysis of cointegration vector. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 12:231–254
Johansen S (1991) Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vector in Gaussian vector autoregressive models. Econometrica 59:1551–1581
Jotzo F, Michaelowa A (2002) Estimating the CDM market under the Marrakech accords. Climate Policy 2:179–196
Klepper G, Peterson S (2006) Emissions trading, CDM, JI, and more: the climate strategy of the EU. Energy Journal 27:1–26
Kwiatkowski D, Philips PCB, Schmidt P, Shin Y (1992) Testing the null of stationary against the alternative of a unit root: how sure are we that the economic time series have a unit root? Journal of Econometrics 54:159–178
Langrock T, Sterk W (2004) The supplementarity challenge: CDM, JI and EU emissions trading. Policy Paper 1/2004. Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy, Wuppertal
Lefevere J (2005) Linking emission trading scheme: the EU ETS and the linking directive. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Lütkepohl H, Kratzig M (2004) Applied time series econometrics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Michaelowa A, Stronzik M, Eckermann F, Hunt A (2003) Transaction costs of the Kyoto mechanisms. Climate Policy 3:261–278
Pesaran H, Shin Y (1998) Generalized impulse response analysis in linear multivariate models. Economic Letters 58:17–29
Point Carbon (2009a) Carbon shrugs off gas shortage concern. Point Carbon News. Carbon Market Europe. 8(1), 9 January
Point Carbon (2009b) European commission unveils post-2012 vision. Point Carbon News. Carbon Market Europe. 8(4), 30 January
Shaw D (2007) How projects from beyond the EU will affect carbon trading. Kyoto Energy. http://www.kyotoenergy.net. Accessed 28 Aug 2008
TFS Green (2008) Clean Development Mechanism. TFS Green part of tradition. http://www.tfsgreen.com/global-markets/clean-development-mechanism/. Accessed 11 Aug 2008
Toda HY, Yamamoto T (1995) Statistical inference in vector autoregressive with possibly integrated processes. Journal of Econometrics 66:225–250
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2004) CDM information and guidebook (2nd edn). United Nations Environment Programme, Roskilde, Denmark
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (1997) Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, FCCC/CP/L.7/Add1, Kyoto
UNFCCC (2002) Report of the conference of the parties on its seventh session. 29 Oct–10 Nov, 2001, Marrakesh. http://unfcc.int/resource/docs/cop7/13.pdf. Accessed 14 Feb 2008
UNFCCC (2009) CDM statistics. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. http://ghg.unfccc.int. Cited
Weitzman M (1974) Prices vs. quantities. Review of Economic Studies 61:477–491
Weyant JP, Hill JN (1999) Introduction and overview. Energy Journal, special issue on the costs of the Kyoto Protocol: A multi-model evaluation, pp 7–44
World Bank (2007) State and trends of the carbon market 2007. World Bank Report, Washington DC
World Bank (2008) State and trends of the carbon market 2008.
World Bank Report, Washington DC World Bank (2009) State and trends of the carbon market 2009. World Bank Report, Washington DC
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Nazifi, F. The price impacts of linking the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme to the Clean Development Mechanism. Environ. Econ. Policy Stud. 12, 164–186 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-010-0168-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-010-0168-3