Abstract
In this paper first principles total energy calculations to study the adsorption of amine group (NH2) on graphene (G) and boron nitride (hBN) nanosheets are developed; the density functional theory, within the local density approximation and Perdew-Wang functional was employed. The sheets were modeled with a sufficiently proved CnHm-like cluster with armchair edge. The optimized geometry was obtained following the minimum energy criterion, searching on four positions for each nanosheet: perpendicular to the carbon atom, on the hexagon, inside the hexagon and on the bridge C–C, for the G-amine interaction; and, perpendicular to the B, perpendicular to the N, on the hexagon, and inside the hexagon, for the hBN-amine interaction. A physisorption, with amine parallel to the C–C–C bond with a distance graphene-amine of 2.56 Å, was found. For the case of BN a B–N bond, with bond length equal to 1.56 Å, was found; the amine lies perpendicular to the nanosheet. When the graphene is doped with B and Al atoms a chemisorption with B–N (1.57 Å) and Al–N (1.78 Å) bonds is observed; the bond angle in the amine group is also incremented, 5.5° and 8.1°, respectively. In the presence of point defects (monovacancies) of B in the hBN-amine and C in the G-amine, there exists chemisorption, increasing the reactivity of the sheets.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The isolation of the graphene (G) in 2004 [1] and the hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) sheet in 2005 [2], have motivated many theoretical as well as experimental studies on these kind of structures, owing to their diversity of applications on chips [3] and biosensors [4], respectively. Main research has been directed to graphene, finding spectacular applications; however, with respect to the applications on the two dimensional (2D) hBN there is scarce knowledge. The similar atomic arrangement between these two systems seems to be transcendental for the applications of the 2D hBN. At the same time, the chemical modification of these surfaces generated new two-dimensional systems [5–12], which require investigations on their functionalization in order to improve their capabilities, searching for new applications. Recently, Zettl et al. [13] have reported a convenient, highly efficient, radical-based chemical approach to functionalize boron nitrides nanotubes (BNNTs) with amine groups via an aggressive non-equilibrium ammonia glow plasma treatment. This renders BNNTs highly dispersible in the common organic solvent chloroform. The efficient polymer functionalization of BNNTs has been shown in order to develop new devices like glucose biosensor [14] and white light emitters [15]; BNNTs based composite materials are now possible [16].
Experimentally speaking, it is easier to find 2D hBN than BNNTs; then, applications for the first case would be more direct than the second one. A specific usage of a system requires the comprehension of the related properties; thinking the BN nanosheets as a biosensor, it would be necessary to know its structural parameters and properties like chemical ones. Searching insights on the former, in this work, the structural and electronic properties of the graphene and boron nitride nanosheets functionalized with the amine group (G–NH2 and hBN–NH2, respectively), are reported. The study has been done within the density functional theory using a circular CnHm-like cluster as the model; this model has been shown to be enough to study the graphene [17, 18] and boron nitride sheets [19]. The main objective of the paper is to analyze, theoretically, the adsorption process of the amine group on the graphene and hexagonal boron nitride surfaces looking for an increase on their reactivity; the intrinsic systems and with point defects (monovacancies) were considered.
Methodological aspects
The clusters we used in the calculations contain 24 carbon and 12 hydrogen atoms for graphene, and a triad of 12-12-12 of boron-nitrogen-hydrogen atoms was used for hexagonal boron nitride. The following sites for the adsorption of NH2 molecule were considered: a) on top of boron (B) in a perpendicular way (Fig. 1a), b) on top of nitrogen (N) in a perpendicular way (Fig. 1b), c) perpendicular to the sheet and inside of the central hexagon (Fig. 1c), and d) lying perpendicular to sheet and on top of central hexagon (Fig. 1d), for the adsorption on the boron nitride sheet; a) on top of carbon (C) in a perpendicular way (Fig. 2a), b) perpendicularly to the C–C bond (Fig. 2b), c) perpendicular to the sheet and inside of the central hexagon (Fig. 2c), and d) perpendicular to sheet and on top of the central hexagon (Fig. 2d), when the adsorption on graphene is treated. For the case of doping graphene with B (Fig. 2e) and Al (Fig. 2f), the amine group is perpendicular to the sheet. When the monovacancies on the hBN sheet were considered, the amine was placed 2 Å away (Fig. 6a). The initial distance G-amine and hBN-amine sheet was of 2.0 Å for all selected configurations. For each system, bond lengths and bond angles, dipole moments, and adiabatic adsorption energies were determined for the configurations of lowest energy.
The obtainment of non-complex frequencies was the criterion for the structural stability of the lowest energy states of the clusters, which were determined through a full geometric optimization process, requiring that all atoms are allowed to relax [20]. Calculations were done within the DFT formalism, using the LDA approximation [21], as implemented in the quantum chemistry DMOL3 code [22]; if the inclusion of spin does not affect the properties of the system, then it was not included in the calculations. The orbital basis set we used includes a p orbital for hydrogen atom, a d orbital for boron, carbon, nitrogen and aluminum atoms; neutral charge was required in all cases. The limit for orbitals was 0.41 nm and the convergence for the SCF cycles was 10−6 Ha. The cohesive energy for different graphene and boron nitride clusters, naphthalene and naphthalene like (B5N5H8), phirene and phirene like (B8N8H10), coronene and coronene like (B12N12H12), and C54H18 and B27N27H18 were calculated, obtaining the value of 3.82 [17] and 1.66 a.u./atom [23] for all of the systems, respectively, justifying from the energetic point of view the use of the armchair cluster as a model for these systems.
Results and discussion
Adsorption of NH2 on boron nitride
The NH2 radical on top of N provided the most stable configuration site, preserving its original orientation (perpendicular to the sheet), as confirmed by the total energy calculations (Fig. 1b). A Hirshfeld population analysis [24] shows a final positive charge for the amine, with a binding energy of −1.05 eV [25] which corresponds to a chemisorption like process; the new strong B-N bond (N of the amine group) formed has a bond length of 1.57 Å, a little bigger than that in reference [26], the B atom is attracted to the sheet inducing a protuberance which favors the adsorption. A similar value has been reported when the amine group is chemisorbed on BN nanotubes with different chiralities [27]. This originates different values on the B–N bond length on the sheet around the protuberance, 1.51, 1.51 and 1.54 Å. Something similar happens when chitosan is adsorbed on the (5,5) BN nanotubes, where a bond length of 1.69 Å was obtained [28]. The B–N bond length depends on the kind of structures which belong. The angle bond of the amine group when adsorbed on the sheet has a value of 9.54°, larger than that of the isolated molecule (102.15°, Table 1). The N–H bond length is reduced by 14 mÅ of its original value (1.04 Å); this means that the BN sheet induces a structural distortion on the amine group, larger than that observed on the adsorption of ozone and water on the same sheet [26, 27]. These changes originate a shift on the vibrational frequencies of the NH2 group, which may be experimentally determined by infra-red photodissociation (IRPD), recently implemented [29]; it is important to note that a modification on the vibrational spectrum would be useful for sensing applications [18].
The dipole moment of the BN sheet (0 D) is incremented to 2.22 D when the NH2 is adsorbed, a change from covalent to ionic character occurs; the vector is directed to the amine, something similar happens when the water molecule is adsorbed (2.47 D) [28]. The ozone molecule does not produce a significant change (0.79 D) on the hBN sheet [25]. The energy gap, defined as the difference of HOMO-LUMO, decreases from 5.17 eV to 0.58 eV, isolating system to semimetal one. The chemical reactivity, obtained with the equation μ = (HOMO + LUMO)/2, decreases from −3.8 eV for the BN to −5.6 eV when the sheet is functionalized with the amine, which may be due to the planar geometry of the sheet, the contrary happens in the case of a tubular BN structure.
Figure 3 shows the molecular orbitals of the amine, the hBN sheet, and the hBN-amine systems. In the case of the hBN sheet the isosurfaces indicate that HOMO is mainly due to the p z atomic orbitals of the nitrogen atom and to the p z for the LUMO (Fig. 3b), in opposite direction. For the hBN-amine system, the p z nitrogen orbitals of the sheet and the p y nitrogen orbital of the amine contribute to the HOMO (Fig. 3c), as in the amine. The LUMO is mainly due to the orbital of the amine with a little presence of the p z orbital of the sheet (Fig. 3a and c), which means that charge is mainly concentrated on the amine. An exothermic process occurs when a C replaces a B in the adsorption site, giving rise to an unstable system.
Adsorption of NH2 on graphene
The lowest energy site happens when the amine group (with final negative charge) is in the C–C bond, the molecule is parallel to the graphene to a distance of 2.68 Å (Fig. 2b). The adsorption energy is of −0.32 eV, which corresponds to a physisorption process (Table 1), similar to the physisorbed ozone on graphene [25]; this value is lowest than the adsorption energy on the hBN-sheet, and to the water (directed to the sheet) on the same sheet [28]. The amine preserves its planar geometry.
The electronegativity of N motivated new research in order to functionalize graphene, both, experimentally and theoretically [30–35]. Moreover, Chi et al. [36] have shown that formaldehyde can be adsorbed on intrinsic and Al-doped graphene. Binding energies in the former case are of the order of meV, while in the latter case the energies are of the order of eV. It is evident that the adsorption energy is favored by the doping of the graphene layer. It seems that the functionalization of graphene with NH2 would have better effects when it is doped with B and Al. Graphene remains planar when it is doped with a B atom on the minimum energy site, generating a little irregularity in the B–C bond lengths with values 1.56, 1.56 and 1.54 Å, on average; the B is immersed in the site where the amine is adsorbed inducing the chemisorption of this group (with positive final charge, Fig. 2c) with an adsorption energy of −2.49 eV (Table 1). The resulting B–N bond length is 1.573 Å, a little larger than that in the case when the amine is adsorbed on the hBN sheet. The doping also affects the angle formed in the amine, increased by 5.54°, with a N–H bond length of 1.04 Å. The Al atom is also chemisorbed on the optimized geometric position (the final charge of amine is negative, Fig. 2d), with an energy of −4.46 eV, generating a protuberance around the Al–N bond which has a bond length of 1.78 Å; different values for the Al–C are found, 1.94, 1.93 y 2.06 Å, similarly to the aluminum nitride sheet [37]. The angle in the amine is incremented by 8.1°.
The polarity of graphene is incremented from 0 D (covalent) to 0.56 and 0.84 D (a little ionic), when it is doped with B and Al, respectively. The dipole moment is a little augmented if the NH2 is adsorbed, 0.84 D with B and 0.92 D with Al; the vector is pointing to the center of the hexagon (Fig. 4). The chemical potential of graphene (μ = −3.92 eV) increases when it is doped with B to −3.84 eV, and when it is doped with Al increases to −3.82 eV; when the amine is adsorbed, this quantity decreases to −4.53 eV, and to −4.54 in the presence of B and Al, respectively. The reactivity is also incremented when amine is adsorbed on the hBN sheet. The energy gap of the graphene has a value of 2.92 eV and when it is doped with B and Al, decreases to 2.54 eV and 1.85 eV, respectively; the presence of amine reduces the gap to 1.10 eV and 0.93 eV for B and Al, respectively.
The isosurfaces of the molecular orbitals show that for graphene the HOMO and the LUMO are mainly due to the p z with opposite direction, forming π molecular orbitals for the HOMO (Fig. 5a); when the amine is adsorbed p y orbitals of the carbon (with π bonds) and p y of the nitrogen conform the HOMO (Fig. 5d), such as in the isolated amine. The p z of the B and C contributes to the HOMO when the graphene is doped with B and to the LUMO the p z of the carbon and nitrogen (Fig. 5e). In the case of the doping with Al and the amine included, the p y (π bonds formed) of C and the p x of the amine constitute the HOMO and the LUMO, with the charge mainly distributed around the doping site (Fig. 5f). There exists a hybridization of the p z of the B and the C (π bond) to form the HOMO (Fig. 5b) and the LUMO (Fig. 5b) is formed with p z of the C for the system graphene-B. Something similar is found when the graphene is doped with Al (Fig. 5c).
Effects of vacancies on the adsorption of the amine group
The generation of point defects is an option to enhance the functionality of a surface; this has been done on graphene [38–43] and on hBN [44, 45]. We think, a monovacancy of C on graphene and monovacancies of B and N on hBN may change the adsorption capacity of these systems, we do that in this work. With the absence of a B atom in the sheet a new N–N bond is formed in the network (Fig. 6a) with a bond length of 1.41 Å with a hybridization sp 3; the angle in the amine is incremented from 102.15° to 108.67° and the N–H bond length is reduced only 0.011 Å. The stress on the bonds originates a reconstruction on the sheet forming a nonagon and a pentagon around the monovacancy forming a N–N bond with a bond length of 1.456 Å. The B–N bond length in the sheet is in the range 1.40 (pentagon) −1.46 Å (hexagon) due to the torsion suffered by the sheet. The adsorption energy of the amine is −3.68 eV, even lower compared with the intrinsic hBN (−1.05 eV); the same tendency is observed when chitosan is adsorbed on this sheet [46]. The energy gap reduces its value to 4.13 eV and the polarity has a value of 1.85 D, which means that the system remains as a semiconductor. The chemical reactivity increases (−3.37 eV), with respect to the BN sheet. The molecular orbitals show contribution of the p x orbital of the amine and of the p z of the nitrogen of the sheet to the HOMO; the LUMO has contribution of the p z of the B and of the N of the sheet.
The vacancy generated in the graphene-amine system induces a reconstruction on the optimized geometry giving rise to a pentagon and a nonagon around the monovacancy (Fig. 6b). A new C–N bond is generated (1.33 Å) with hybridization sp 2. The C–C bond length has values from 1.36 to 1.52 Å, due to the curvature of the mesh. The bond angle in the amine (which is quimisorbed with energy −5.19 eV) is of 116.87° and the N–H bond length of 1.022 Å. The energy gap has the value 1.94 eV and the chemical reactivity is −3.29 eV, which means that the vacancy change graphene from conductor to a semiconductor and increases the reactivity. The dipole moment is 1.40 D. The atomic orbitals that mainly contribute to the HOMO are the p x of the amine and the p z of the carbon forming π bonds; the LUMO is formed with the p z of the carbon and with the p z of the amine.
Finally, when graphene is doped with N including the monovacancy, the amine is bonded to the nearest carbon with a bond length of 1.443 Å (Fig. 7) inducing a protuberance; the H–N–H angle increases by 9.32°, and the N–H bond length decreases by 0.018 Å. The dipole moment (0.74 D) is outward to the center of the hexagon and the chemical potential (−3.5 eV) indicates a reduction on the chemical reactivity.
Conclusions
The circular cluster model CnHm has permitted us to analyze the structural and electronic properties of the graphene and the two dimensional BN in the presence of the triatomic amine group; the effect of the doping with B and Al was also studied. Results show that the adsorption mechanism is similar to that of the adsorption of water and ozone molecules on these systems, and that the angle in the amine increases with respect to the isolated one. At the same time, the capacity of the graphene to adsorb molecules of biological and industrial interest is clear. It is important to mention the little change in the polarity of the graphene when it is doped, but the big increase of this property on the BN. A considerable reduction of the gap is found, from semiconductor to a semimetal one; the chemical reactivity is also reduced, contrary to the tubular structures. The vacancies on the sheets increase the chemical reactivity, which may be useful in the design of electronic devices, and those involved in catalytic reactions free of metals, as proposed for N doped nanotubes [47] and nanosheets [48].
References
Novoselov KS, Geim AK, Morozov SV, Jiang D, Zhang Y, Dubonos SV, Grigorieva IV, Firsov AA (2004) Science 306:666–669
Novoselov KS, Jiang D, Schedin F, Booth TJ, Khotkevich VV, Morozov SV, Geim AK (2005) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:10451–10453
Lin YM, Valdes Garcia A, Han SJ, Farmer DB, Meric I, Sun Y, Wu Y, Dimitrakopoulos C, Grill A, Avouris P, Jenkins KA (2010) Science 332:1294–1297
Pumera M (2011) Mater Today 14:308–315
Sofo JO, Chaudhari AS, Barber GD (2007) Phys Rev B 75:153401–153404
Wang WL, Kaxiras E (2010) New J Phys 12(125012):1–7
Nair RR, Ren WC, Jalil R, Diaz I, Kravets VG, Britnell L, Blake P, Schedin F, Mayorov AS, Yuan S, Katsnelson MI, Cheng HM, Strupinski W, Bulsheva LG, Okotrub AV, Grigoreva IV, Grigorenko AN, Novoselov KS, Geim AK (2010) Small 6(24):2877–2884
Wang Y (2010) Phys Status Solidi RRL 4:34–36
Yaya A, Ewels CP, Suarez-Martinez I, Wagner PH, Lefrant S, Okotrub A, Bulusheva L, Briddon PR (2011) Phys Rev B 83(045411):1–5
Lew Yan Voon LC, Sandberg E, Aga RS, Farajian AA (2010) App Phys Lett 97(163114):1–3
Valentini L, Cardinali M, Kenny J M, Prato M, Monticelli O (2011) arXiv:1112.3459
Li B, Zhou L, Wu D, Peng H, Yan K, Zhou Y, Liu Z (2011) ACS Nano 5:5957–5961
Ikuno T, Sainsbury T, Okawa D, Frechet JMJ, Zettl A (2007) Solid State Commun 142:643–646
Wu J, Yin L (2011) ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 3:4354–4362
Gao Z, Zhi CH, Bando Y, Golberg D, Serizawa T (2011) ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 3:627–632
Zhi CH, Bando Y, Tang CH, Kuwahara H, Golberg D (2009) Adv Mater 21:2889–2893
Hernández Rosas JJ, Ramirez Gutierrez RE, Escobedo Morales A, Chigo Anota E (2011) J Mol Model 17(5):1133–1139
Rangel NL, Seminario GM (2008) J Phys Chem A 112:13699–13705
Chigo Anota E, Salazar Villanueva M, Hernández Cocoletzi H (2011) J Nanosci Nanotechnol 11(6):5515–5518
Foresman JB, Frisch Æ (1996) Exploring chemistry with electronic structure methods, 2nd edn. Gaussian Inc, USA, p 70
Perdew JP, Wang Y (1992) Phys Rev B 45:13244–13249
Delley B (1990) J Chem Phys 92:508–517
Chigo Anota E, Ramírez Gutierrez RE, Escobedo Morales A, Hernandez Cocoletzi G (2012) J Mol Model 18(5):2175–2184
Hirshfeld FL (1977) Theor Chim Acta B 44:129–138
Aguilar GG (1985) Adsorción y catálisis, ed. Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, México, pp 1–20
Chigo Anota E, Hernández Cocoletzi H, Rubio Rosas E (2011) Eur Phys J D 63:271–273
Cao F, Ren W, Ji Y, Zhao C (2009) Nanotechnology 20(145703):1–7
Rodríguez Juárez A, Chigo Anota E, Flores Riveros A, Hernández Cocoletzi H (2012) DFT investigation of the adsorption of chitosan on BN nanotubes. J Mat Sci Eng: A (submitted)
Chigo Anota E, Salazar Villanueva M (2009) Sup y Vac 22(2):23–28
Jaegger TD, van Heinsbergen D, Klippenstein SJ, von Helden G, Meijer G, Duncan MA (2004) J Am Chem Soc 126:10981–10991
Wu T, Shen H, Sun L, Cheng B, Liu B, Shen J (2012) New J Chem 36:1385–1391
Zhao W, Höfert O, Gotterbarm K, Zhu JF, Papp C, Steinrück HP (2012) J Phys Chem C 116(8):5062–5066
Long D, Li W, Ling L, Miyawaki J, Mochida I, Yoon SH (2010) Langmuir 26(20):16096–16102
Usachov D, Vilkov O, Grüneis A, Haberer D, Fedorov A, Adamchuk VK, Preobrajenski AB, Dudin P, Barinov A, Oehzelt M, Laubschat C, Vyalikh DV (2011) Nano Lett 11(12):5401–5407
Chigo Anota E (2009) Sup y Vac 22(1):19–23
Chi M, Zhao YP (2009) Comput Mater Sci 46:1085–1090
Chigo Anota E, Salazar Villanueva M, Hernández Cocoletzi H (2010) Phys Status Solidi C 7:2252–2254
Gass MH, Bangert U, Bleloch AL, Wang P, Nair RR, Geim AK (2008) Nat Nanotechnol 3:676–681
Meyer JC, Kisielowski C, Erni R, Rossell MD, Crommie MF, Zettl A (2008) Nano Lett 8(11):3582–3586
Ugeda MM, Brihuega I, Guinea F, Gómez Rodríguez JM (2010) Phys Rev Lett 104(9)(096804):1–4
Bagri A, Mattevi C, Acik M, Chabal YJ, Chhowalla M, Shenoy VB (2010) Nat Chem 2:581–587
Banhart F, Kotakoski J, Krasheninnikov AV (2011) ACS Nano 5:26–41
Kotakoski J, Krasheninnikov AV (2011) Comput Nanosci 11:334–376
Alem N, Erni R, Kisielowski C, Rossell MD, Gannett W, Zettl A (2009) Phys Rev B 80(15)(155425):1–7
Lin Y, Williams TF, Cao W, Elsayed-Ali HE, Connell JW (2010) J Phys Chem C 114(41):17434–17439
Chigo Anota E, Escobedo Morales A, Hernández Rodríguez LD, Juárez Rodríguez A (2012) Observation of the chitosan adsorption on boron nitride nanosheets using the density functional theory. J Mat Sci Eng: A (submitted)
Van Dommels S, de Jong KP, Bitter JH (2006) Chem Commun 4859–4861
Long J, Xie X, Xu J, Gu Q, Chen L, Wang X (2012) ACS Catal 2:622–631
Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE et al. (2009) Gaussian09, Revision C.01-SMP. Gaussian Inc, Pittsburgh
Portmann S (2002) Molekel version 4.3.win32
Acknowledgments
This work was partially supported by projects: Vicerrectoria de Investigación y Estudios de Posgrado-Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla (CHAE-ING12-G), Cuerpo Académico Ingeniería en Materiales (BUAP-CA-177) and Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología-México (No. 83982).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anota, E.C., Juárez, A.R., Castro, M. et al. A density functional theory analysis for the adsorption of the amine group on graphene and boron nitride nanosheets. J Mol Model 19, 321–328 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-012-1539-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-012-1539-4