Abstract
The recent classification of renal tumors is based on genetic evidence as well as on histologic features. Malignant tumor includes clear cell renal carcinoma (RCC), multilocular cystic RCC, papillary RCC, chromophobe RCC, carcinoma of the collecting duct of Bellini, renal carcinoma associated with Xp11.2 translocations/TFE3 gene fusions and mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma. Benign tumor is subdivided into papillary adenoma, renal oncocytoma and metanephric adenoma. Recently, new disease entities such as acquired cystic disease-associated RCC, clear cell papillary RCC and renal carcinoma with t(6;11)(p21:q12) have been discovered. In this article, we briefly review and introduce the clinical, morphological and genetic features of these tumor entities.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The classification of renal tumor had been traditionally determined according to the morphological difference including the cytological appearance and architecture of tumor cells. However, the genetic characteristics in various tumors have been elucidated. Therefore, recent classification has been performed on the basis of genetic difference as well as morphological difference [1]. In addition, some new disease entities have been proposed recently. In this article, we review the overview of renal tumor classification and introduce these tumor entities briefly. Morphological, immunohistochemical and genetic features of each subtype of renal tumors are summarized in Table 1.
Clear cell renal cell carcinoma
This tumor accounts for 80 % of all renal neoplasms. Grossly, the tumor is well circumscribed, but large tumor may show the infiltrating growth. The tumor capsule is usually absent. The cut surface of the tumor show the golden-yellow in color, but hemorrhage or necrosis may be often observed. Histologically, the tumor proliferates with alveolar, solid, tubular or cystic patterns (Fig. 1). The cytoplasm exhibits the clear cell cytology reflecting abundant glycogen and fat in low grade tumors but granular cell cytology in high grade tumor. Immunohistochemically, neoplastic cells are usually positive for CA9, RCC Ma, CD10 and PAX2, but negative or focally positive for cytokeratin 7 [1, 2]. Genetically, abnormalities such as mutation or methylation of von Hippel–Lindau (VHL) gene located at the chromosome 3p25 or loss of chromosome 3p have been frequently found [1–5]. The prognosis of this tumor depends on nuclear grade [1].
Multilocular cystic renal cell carcinoma
This tumor comprises 4 % of clear cell RCC [2]. Grossly, the tumor is well circumscribed with capsular formation and multicystic appearance, but there is no expansile nodule. Microscopically, the cyst wall is lined by neoplastic cells with clear cytoplasm (Fig. 2). The Fuhrman nuclear grade usually corresponds to grade 1 [6, 7]. The deletion of chromosome 3p is observed in most tumors using LOH or FISH analysis and VHL gene mutation was identified in 25 % of MCRCC. As the majority of this tumor is incidentally discovered, patients pursue a favorable clinical course [7].
Papillary renal cell carcinoma
This tumor type comprises 10–15 % of all renal neoplasm [1, 2]. Macroscopically, the tumor form well-circumscribed mass and the pseudocapsule may be seen. The cut surface shows yellow or brown in color according to the amount of abundant foamy macrophages or hemorrhage. Microscopically, the tumor is subdivided into two categories. The first is type 1 and the tumor is composed of small neoplastic cells with scant amphophilic to basophilic cytoplasm and low nuclear grade (Fig. 3a). The second is type 2 and the tumor consists of columnar cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm and high nuclear grade. In type 2, nuclear pseudostratification is often observed (Fig. 3b) [8, 9]. Psammoma bodies or foamy macrophages may be seen in the stroma. Immunohistochemically, the positive for cytokeratin 7, AMACR, CD10 and RCC Ma is frequent. However, the positive for cytokeratin 7 is more frequent in type 1 than type 2 [1, 2]. Recently, the oncocytic variant is identified. The tumor cells show the oncocytic cytoplasm and nuclei located along the luminal sides without pseudostratification. The prognosis of type 1 tumor is more favorable than that of type 2 tumor. This difference seems to depend on the nuclear grade.
Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma
The incidence of this tumor type accounts for 5 % of all renal neoplasms. The gross picture shows well-demarcated mass without capsules. The cut surface of the tumor shows beige or pale-tan in color [1, 2]. Microscopically, the tumor is subdivided into two categories. In the typical variant, tumor cells predominantly consist of pale cells with finely reticular cytoplasm and distinct cell border (Fig. 4a). In eosinophilic variant, eosinophilic cells are predominant and account for more than 80 % (Fig. 4b). Nuclear outline is irregular and nuclei often show the shrunken pattern. Binucleation or perinuclear halo is usually seen [10–12]. At contrast, renal oncocytoma has round and centrally located nuclei and lack perinuclear halo. Immunohistochemically, tumor cells show the diffuse positivity for cytokeratin 7 with membranous accentuation, but CA9 is usually negative. CD10 is generally negative, but may be positive in tumors with aggressive clinical courses. Cytogenetically, losses of chromosomes 1, 2, 6, 10, 13, 17 and 21 are noted. The prognosis of chromophobe RCC is better than that of clear cell RCC, but tumors with sarcomatoid change and extensive necrosis may show the aggressive clinical course [1, 2].
Carcinoma of the collecting duct of Bellini
The incidence of this tumor comprises less than 1 % of all renal cancers. Grossly, the tumor is located in the medulla and form the whitish mass with irregular border [1, 2]. Microscopically, the various growth patterns such as tubular, solid, papillary, cribriform or hobnail are observed (Fig. 5). Intracytoplasmic mucin may be identified in some cases. The identification of dysplasia in the collecting duct surrounding the tumor may become the diagnostic clue for collecting duct carcinoma [13–15]. According to the previous reports, there are no consistent specific genetic abnormalities for this tumor category. The prognosis of this tumor is worse, the two-thirds of patients die of cancer within 2 years after disease discovery [1, 2].
Renal carcinoma associated with Xp11.2 translocations/TFE3 gene fusions
The tumor generally affects pediatrics and young adults, and accounts for approximately 1 % of all renal neoplasm in adults. The tumor shows the well-demarked mass without capsular formation. The cut surface of the tumor demonstrates the tan-yellow in color and hemorrhage or necrosis may be often observed. Microscopically, voluminous neoplastic cells with clear to eosinophilic cells proliferate with alveolar or papillary configuration in ASPL-TFE3 RCC. In the stroma, psammoma bodies or hyaline nodules are occasionally seen (Fig. 6). In PRCC-TFE3 RCC, tumor cells show the less abundant cytoplasm and the stroma exhibits few psammoma bodies or hyaline nodules. Immunohistochemical labeling for TFE3 in the nuclei is a useful tool for this tumor. In addition, CD10, RCC Ma and AMACR are usually positive. The genetic fusion of TFE3 to some genes including ASPL, PRCC, PSF, NonO and CLTC has been identified to date. In prognosis, adult cases may pursue more aggressive clinical course than pediatric patients [1, 2, 16, 17].
Mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma
The gross features of this tumor is generally well defined and the cut surface impart gray–white to tan or yellow color. Histologically, the tumor consists of tubules with frequent elongation and spindle cell with low cytologic atypia in the mucin deposition of the stroma (Fig. 7). Papillary configuration may be present. Immunohistochemically, tumor cells are usually positive for cytokeratin 7 and AMACR. CD10 is negative but may be focally positive. The positivity for RCC Ma varies from a case to a case. Cytogenetically, losses of chromosomes 1, 4, 6, 8, 13, 14, 15 and 22 are observed [18]. Most cases show the indolent clinical behavior, but some aggressive cases have recently been reported [1, 2, 19].
Papillary adenoma
According to the definition of the recent WHO classification, papillary adenoma is the tumor consisting of papillary or tubular architecture of low nuclear grade and 5 mm in diameter or smaller. Most tumors are incidentally found in the kidney removed by nephrectomy because of renal tumor or at autopsy. Genetically, gain of chromosomes 7 and 17 and loss of chromosome Y are observed. This tumor is considered as a precursor of papillary RCC [1, 2].
Oncocytoma
The tumor accounts for 5 % of all renal neoplasm. The gross features of this tumor show well-circumscribed, non-encapsulated mass and the cut surface shows mahogany–brown color. One-third of tumors may exhibit central scar. Histologically, the tumor with oncocytic cytoplasm proliferates with solid compact nest, acinar or organoid pattern in the edematous or hyalinized stroma (Fig. 8). Nuclei show round shape and are centrally located in the cytoplasm. Nuclear chromatin is evenly distributed. In molecular aspect, loss of chromosomes 1 and Y or chromosome 11q13 alteration may be observed. This tumor is benign [1, 2, 20–22].
Metanephric adenoma
This tumor occurs in children and adults with a female predilection. Macroscopically, the tumor is well defined but not encapsulated. Histologically, the tumor consists of small acini and tubules with scant cytoplasm. Papillary configuration or glomeruloid bodies may be focally seen (Fig. 9). In the stroma, hyalinization or psammoma bodies are often observed. Immunohistochemically, tumor cells are positive for WT1 and CD57. The clinical course is generally favorable [1, 2, 23–25].
Newly identified entities
Acquired cystic disease-associated renal cell carcinoma
This tumor exclusively occurs in patients with acquired cystic disease receiving long-term dialysis. Histologically, various growth patterns including, papillary, tubular, solid and microcystic architectures are seen. The tumor cytoplasm is generally deep eosinophilic or oncocytic (Fig. 10). The stroma contains the oxalate crystals that are highlighted by a polarized microscope. Immunohistochemically, tumor cells are positive for AMACR but negative for cytokeratin 7 [2, 26–28]. The prognosis is generally favorable because patients receiving dialysis receive a periodical medical examination. However, some cases with sarcomatoid change or rhabdoid features have been reported to date [27–30].
Clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma
This tumor occurs in both patients with end-stage kidney disease or patients without renal dysfunction or failure. Gross picture of this tumor shows well-circumscribed mass with capsule and cystic formation. Histologically, tumor cells with clear cell cytoplasm usually show the marked papillary growth (Fig. 11). Tubules or acini of tumor cells may be noted. Immunohistochemically, neoplastic cells are positive for cytokeratin 7 but negative for AMACR. Genetically, this tumor has no characteristics of clear cell or papillary RCC. The clinical behavior is generally indolent because of the frequent low stage [2, 31, 32].
Renal carcinoma with t(6;11)(p21:q12)
This tumor generally affects children and young adults but some adult cases have been reported. Macroscopically, satellite nodules are often observed around the main tumor. Microscopically, the tumor is composed of large neoplastic cells and small neoplastic cells surrounding basement membrane materials, giving rise to the rosette-like morphology (Fig. 12). Immunohistochemical expression of TFEB in nuclei is an available diagnostic tool. The fusion between TFEB gene and alpha gene is genetically found [2, 33–35].
References
Eble JN, Sauter G, Epstein JI, Sesterhenn IA (eds) (2004) World Health Organization Classification of Tumors. Pathology & Genetics. Tumours of the urinary system and male genital organ. IARC press, Lyon
Amin MB, McKenney JK, Tickoo SK, Paner GP, Shen SS, Velazquez EF, Cubilla AL, Ro JY, Reuter VE (eds) (2010) Diagnostic pathology, genitourinary. Amirsys, LWW, Canada
Shuin T, Kondo K, Torigoe S, Kishida T, Kubota Y, Hosaka M, Nagashima Y, Kitamura H, Latif F, Zbar B, Lerman MI, Yao M (1994) Frequent somatic mutations and loss of heterozygosity of the von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor gene in primary human renal cell carcinomas. Cancer Res 54:2852–2855
Nagashima Y, Inayama Y, Kato Y, Kanno H, Aoki I, Yao M (2004) Pathological and molecular biological aspects of the renal epithelial neoplasms, up-to-date. Pathol Int 54:377–386
Sükösd F, Kuroda N, Beothe T, Kaur AP, Kovacs G (2003) Deletion of chromosome 3p14.2-p25 involving in the VHL and FHIT genes in conventional renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Res 63:455–457
Williamson SR, Halat S, Eble JN, Grignon DJ, Lopez-Beltran A, Montironi R, Tan P-H, Wang M, Zhang S, MacLennan GT, Baldridge LA, Cheng L (2012) Multilocular cystic renal cell carcinoma. Similarities and difference in immunoprofile compared with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 36:1425–1433
Kuroda N, Ohe C, Mikami S, Inoue K, Nagashima Y, Cohen RJ, Pan CC, Michal M, Hes O (2012) Multilocular cystic renal cell carcinoma with focus on clinical and pathobiological aspects. Histol Histopathol 27:969–974
Delahunt B, Eble JN (1997) Papillary renal cell carcinoma: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 105 tumors. Mod Pathol 10:537–544
Kuroda N, Toi M, Hiroi M, Enzan H (2003) Review of papillary renal cell carcinoma with focus on clinical and pathobiological aspects. Histol Histopathol 18:487–494
Thoenes W, Störkel S, Rumplet H-J, Moll R, Baum HP, Werner S (1988) Chromophobe cell renal carcinoma and its variant—a report of 32 cases. J Pathol 155:277–287
Nagashima Y (2000) Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: clinical, pathological and molecular biological aspects. Pathol Int 50:872–878
Kuroda N, Toi M, Hiroi M, Enzan H (2003) Review of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma with focus on clinical and pathobiological aspects. Histol Histopathol 18:165–171
Fleming S, Lewi HJE (1986) Collecting duct carcinoma of the kidney. Histopathology 10:1131–1141
Kobayashi N, Matsuzaki O, Shirai S, Aoki I, Yao M, Nagashima Y (2008) Collecting duct carcinoma of the kidney: an immunohistochemical evaluation of the use of antibodies for differential diagnosis. Hum Pathol 39:1350–1359
Kuroda N, Toi M, Hiroi M, Enzan H (2002) Review of collecting duct carcinoma with focus on clinical and pathobiological aspects. Histol Histopathol 17:1329–1334
Armah HB, Parwani AV (2010) Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med 134:124–129
Kuroda N, Mikami S, Pan CC, Cohen RJ, Hes O, Michal M, Nagashima Y, Tanaka Y, Inoue K, Shuin T, Lee GH (2012) Review of renal carcinoma associated with Xp11.2 translocations/TFE3 gene fusions with focus on pathobiological aspect. Histol Histopathol 27:133–140
Rakozy C, Schmahl GE, Bogner S, Störkel S (2002) Low-grade tubular-mucinous renal neoplasms: morphologic, immunohistochemical, and genetic features. Mod Pathol 15:1162–1171
Kuroda N, Toi M, Hiroi M, Suin T, Enzan H (2005) Review of mucinous tubular and spindle-cell carcinoma of the kidney with focus on clinical and pathobiological aspects. Histol Histopathol 20:221–224
Amin MB, Crotty TB, Tickoo SK, Farrow GM (1997) Renal oncocytoma: a reappraisal of morphologic features with clinicopathologic findings in 80 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 21:1–12
Perez-Ordonez B, Hamed G, Campbell S, Erlandson RA, Russo P, Gaudin S, Reuter VE (1997) Renal oncocytoma: a clinicopathologic study of 70 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 21:871–883
Kuroda N, Toi M, Hiroi M, Shuin T, Enzan H (2003) Review of renal oncocytoma with focus on clinical and pathobiological aspects. Histol Histopathol 18:935–942
Grignon DV, Eble JN (1998) Papillary and metanephric adenomas of the kidney. Semin Diagn Pathol 15:41–53
Wade Strong J, Ro JY (1996) Metanephric adenoma of the kidney: a newly characterized entity. Adv Anat Pathol 3:172–178
Kuroda N, Toi M, Hiroi M, Enzan H (2003) Review of metanephric adenoma of the kidney with focus on clinical and pathobiological aspects. Histol Histopathol 18:253–257
Sule N, Yakupoglu U, Shen SS, Krishnan B, Yang G, Lerner S, Sheikh-Hamad D, Troung LD (2005) Calcium oxalate deposition in renal cell carcinoma associated with acquired cystic kidney disease: a comprehensive study. Am J Surg Pathol 29:443–451
Tickoo SK, dePeralta-Venturina MN, Harik LR, Worcester HD, Salama ME, Young AN, Moch H, Amin MB (2006) Spectrum of epithelial neoplasms in end-stage renal disease: an experience from 66 tumor-bearing kidneys with emphasis on histologic patterns distinct from those in sporadic adult renal neoplasia. Am J Surg Pathol 30:141–153
Kuroda N, Ohe C, Mikami S, Hes O, Michal M, Brunelli M, Martignoni G, Sato Y, Yoshino T, Kakehi Y, Shuin T, Lee GH (2011) Review of acquired cystic disease-associated renal cell carcinoma with focus on pathobiological aspects. Histol Histopathol 26:1215–1218
Kuroda N, Tamura M, Taguchi T, Tominaga A, Hes O, Michal M, Ohara M, Hirouchi T, Mizuno K, Hayashi Y, Shuin T, Lee GH (2008) Sarcomatoid acquired cystic disease-associated renal cell carcinoma. Histol Histopathol 23:1327–1331
Kuroda N, Tamura M, Hamaguchi N, Mikami S, Pan CC, Brunelli M, Martignoni G, Hes O, Michal M, Lee GH (2011) Acquired cystic disease-associated renal cell carcinoma with sarcomatoid change and rhabdoid features. Ann Diagn Pathol 15:462–466
Ross H, Martignoni G, Argani P (2011) Renal cell carcinoma with clear cell and papillary features. Arch Pathol Lab Med 136:391–399
Kuroda N, Shiotsu T, Kawada C, Shuin T, Hes O, Michal M, Ohe C, Mikami S, Pan CC (2011) Clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma and clear cell renal cell carcinoma arising in acquired cystic disease of the kidney: an immunohistochemical and genetic study. Ann Diagn Pathol 15:282–285
Argani P, Hawkins A, Griffin CA, Goldstein JD, Haas M, Beckwith JB, Mankinen CB, Perlman EJ (2001) A distinctive pediatric renal neoplasm characterized by epithelioid morphology, basement membrane production, focal HMB45 immunoreactivity, and t(6;11)(p21;q12) chromosome translocation. Am J Pathol 158:2089–2096
Argani P, Laé M, Hutchinson B, Reuter VE, Collins MH, Perentesis J, Tomaszewski JE, Brooks JS, Acs G, Bridge JA, Vargas SO, Davis IJ, Fisher DE, Ladanyi M (2005) Renal carcinomas with the t(6;11)(p21;q12): clinicopathologic features and demonstration of the specific alpha-TFEB gene fusion by immunohistochemistry, RT-PCR, and DNA PCR. Am J Surg Pathol 29:230–240
Petersson F, Vaněček T, Michal M, Martignoni G, Brunelli M, Halbhuber Z, Spagnolo D, Kuroda N, Yang XJ, Alvarado-Cabrero I, Hora M, Branžovský J, Trivunic S, Kacerovská D, Steiner P, Hes O (2012) A distinctive translocation of the kidney; “rosette forming”, t(6;11), HMB45-positive renal tumor: a histomorphologic, immunohistochemical, ultrastructural, and molecular genetic study of 4 cases. Hum Pathol 43:726–736
Debelenko LV, Raimondi SC, Daw N, Shivakumar BR, Huang D, Nelson M, Bridge JA (2011) Renal cell carcinoma with novel VCL-ALK fusion: new representative of ALK-associated tumor spectrum. Mod Pathol 24:430–442
Mariño-Enríquez A, Ou W-B, Weldon CB, Fletcher JA, Pérez-Atayde AR (2011) ALK rearrangement in sickle cell trait-associated renal medullary carcinoma. Genes Chromosom Cancer 5:146–153
Sugawara E, Togashi Y, Kuroda N, Sakata S, Hatano S, Asaka R, Yuasa T, Yonese J, Kitagawa M, Mano H, Ishikawa Y, Takeuchi K (2012) Identification of anaplastic lymphoma kinase fusions in renal cancer: large-scale immunohistochemical screening by the intercalated antibody-enhanced polymer method. Cancer 118:4427–4436
Sukov WR, Hodge JC, Lohse CM, Akre MK, Leibovich BC, Thompson RH, Cheville JC (2012) ALK alterations in adult renal cell carcinoma: frequency, clinicopathologic features and outcome in a large series of consecutively treated patients. Mod Pathol 25:1516–1525
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to doctors sending us some rare consultation cases.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kuroda, N., Tanaka, A. Recent classification of renal epithelial tumors. Med Mol Morphol 47, 68–75 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00795-013-0033-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00795-013-0033-0