Abstract
Winter phytoplankton communities in the shallow alkaline pans of Hungary are frequently dominated by picoeukaryotes, sometimes in particularly high abundance. In winter 2012, the ice-covered alkaline Zab-szék pan was found to be extraordinarily rich in picoeukaryotic green algae (42–82 × 106 cells ml−1) despite the simultaneous presence of multiple stressors (low temperature and light intensity with high pH and salinity). The maximum photosynthetic rate of the picoeukaryote community was 1.4 μg C μg chlorophyll a −1 h−1 at 125 μmol m−2 s−1. The assimilation rates compared with the available light intensity measured on the field show that the community was considerably light-limited. Estimated areal primary production was 180 mg C m−2 d−1. On the basis of the 18S rRNA gene analysis (cloning and DGGE), the community was phylogenetically heterogeneous with several previously undescribed chlorophyte lineages, which indicates the ability of picoeukaryotic communities to maintain high genetic diversity under extreme conditions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Algae and cyanobacteria of the pico (<2 μm) size range, commonly referred to as photoautotrophic picoplankton (PPP), are frequently occurring members of the phytoplankton (Callieri and Stockner 2002), and are often major contributors to primary production in marine and freshwater environments (Stockner and Antia 1986; Gaulke et al. 2010). Their discovery was closely related to the spreading application of epifluorescence microscopy and since that time our knowledge on these organisms has been steadily expanding. While in situ measurements and focused experimental efforts have provided a substantial amount of information on their ecology, their phylogenetic identification requires the use of molecular biological methods, since their small size mostly hinders microscopic identification on lower taxonomic levels (Callieri 2008). In several cases, the major picoplanktonic groups, picocyanobacteria and picoeukaryotes have been found to show characteristic temporal dynamics with their relative abundance highly depending on various physicochemical factors, such as light intensity, nutrient availability (Bec et al. 2011; Winder 2009) or temperature (Mózes et al. 2006).
There is an increasing amount of information on the ecology and phylogenetic community composition of autotrophic picoplankton found in the shallow lakes of Hungary (Vörös et al. 1991; Felföldi et al. 2009). Shallow alkaline pans in the central part of Hungary are particularly rich in PPP communities (Vörös et al. 2005). These turbid, hyposaline ponds with a pH of 9–10 and Na+ and HCO3 – as dominant ions are extreme habitats for algae, in terms of light conditions in particular, because the high amount of suspended solids and humic substances characteristic for these waters always result in very low Secchi-disk transparency (1–2 cm) (Vörös et al. 2006; Felföldi et al. 2009). The various groups of autotrophic picoplankton show characteristic seasonal dynamics in these lakes: while picocyanobacteria dominate in summer, winter communities exclusively consist of picoeukaryotes (Somogyi et al. 2009).
Weather conditions in winter 2012 allowed for the build-up of a 6–25 cm thick ice cover on these pans. In spite of the multiple environmental stresses of constantly low temperature, low underwater light intensity and moderately high salinity and pH, the water of Zab-szék pan was bright green as a result of a highly abundant PPP community thriving under the ice. Since the occurrence of such phenomena is rarely documented in the temperate zone, the aim of the present study was to determine the abundance of this photoautotrophic picoplankton community, to explore its phylogenetic diversity, and to assess their efficiency as primary producers through measuring their photosynthesis along a light intensity gradient at ambient temperature.
Materials and methods
Site description, sampling and in situ measurements
Zab-szék is a shallow (5–40 cm deep), turbid alkaline pan with a surface area of 100 ha situated in the Kiskunság region in the central part of Hungary (geographical map is presented in Felföldi et al. 2009). In February 2012, the pan was completely covered with 6–25 cm thick ice. On 15 February, water samples were taken at seven stations through holes cut in the ice (Fig. 1) with the simultaneous measurement of physical and chemical variables including temperature, pH, conductivity and dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration, all of which were determined with a WTW MultiLine portable field meter (P 8211). Light attenuation of the ice cover was measured with a LI-COR quantum sensor (2π).
Laboratory measurements
Freshly collected samples were immediately transported into laboratory for additional measurements. Total suspended solids (TSS) content was determined gravimetrically after sample filtration on 0.4 μm pore size cellulose acetate filters. The concentration of chromophoric dissolved organic matter (CDOM) was determined as Pt colour. In brief, water samples were filtered through GF-5 glass fibre filters, buffered with borate buffer, and subsequently absorption was measured against a blank at 440 and 750 nm (Kirk 1996) using a Shimadzu UV 160A spectrophotometer. After correcting sample absorbance at 440 nm with that of the blank at 440 nm and the sample at 750 nm, Pt unit was calculated with the formula of Cuthbert and del Giorgio (1992). Chlorophyll a concentration was determined spectrophotometrically after hot methanol extraction using the absorption coefficients determined by Wellburn (1994).
The concentration of different nitrogen and phosphorus forms was also determined as follows. Ammonium (NH4 +) concentration was measured with the indophenol blue method (Mackereth et al. 1989), nitrate (NO3 −) analysis was performed with the Cd-reduction method (Elliott and Porter 1971), while the amount of urea was determined as described by Newell et al. (1967). The amount of total phosphorus (TP) was measured according to Gales et al. (1966); briefly, all the phosphorus forms were transformed into PO4 3− by dissolving the samples in K2S2O8 for 1 h at 121 °C. After adding 5.4 % ascorbic acid and a reagent solution (14 % H2SO4, 3 % (NH4)2MoO4 and 0.34 % C4H4KO7Sb), the absorbance of the mixture was measured at 890 nm using a SHIMADZU UV–VIS spectrophotometer. Soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP) was determined according to the method of Murphy and Riley (1962).
Microscopic analysis
Photoautotrophic picoplankton was examined from freshly collected samples immediately after transport to laboratory. 0.5–1 ml subsamples were filtered onto 0.4 μm pore-sized black polycarbonate filters, which were subsequently embedded into 50 % glycerol on a microscopy slide. The slides were examined with a Nikon Optiphot 2 epifluorescence microscope at 1,000× magnification using blue–violet (BV-2A) and green (G-2A) excitation light. 20 fields (~400 cells) were photographed with a Spot RT colour camera and PPP was counted on the images to avoid fluorescence fading. Picoeukaryotes fluoresce vivid red under blue–violet excitation and show no or only weak fluorescence when excited with green light. Picocyanobacteria can be distinguished from eukaryotes owing to the presence of phycobiliproteins, which exhibit greatly enhanced red fluorescence when using the green wave band. Phycoerythrin-rich picocyanobacteria fluoresce bright yellow, while phycocyanin-rich picocyanobacteria show weak red autofluorescence in blue–violet excitation light (MacIsaac and Stockner 1993). Photoautotrophic picoplankton abundance was converted to biomass by measuring the dimensions of 200 cells with dia-illumination, calculating their biovolume and considering an average density of 1 g cm−3.
Photosynthesis measurement
Photosynthesis of the photoautotrophic picoplankton community was measured using the 14C–technique (Steemann Nielsen 1952). The sample collected at station 4 was diluted to 20 μg l−1 chlorophyll a with filtered water from the pan to reduce self-shading. 20 ml subsamples of the diluted sample were put into glass vials, preincubated for 1 h, and after adding NaH14CO3 (0.084 MBq) incubated for 3 h in triplicates in a water bath (1 °C) under cool white fluorescent illumination of 6, 10, 26, 66, 222, 390, 706 and 1363 μmol m−2 s−1. For dark carbon uptake, three vials were incubated in darkness. Samples were subsequently filtered through 0.45 μm pore size cellulose-acetate membrane filters and put into HCl vapour to remove remaining inorganic 14C. Next the filters were dissolved in 10 ml Bray scintillation mixture, after which radioactivity was measured with an LKB 1211-RACKBETA liquid scintillation counter. Photosynthesis–irradiance (P–I) curves were fitted using the model of Eilers and Peeters (1988) with the data analysis software OriginPro 7.5. Daily areal primary production was estimated using the P–I curves and the light intensity profile of the water column. Average ambient light intensity for each hour was calculated from the hourly sums of global radiation for the day of sampling provided by the Hungarian Meteorological Service, assuming that 1 W m−2 = 4.6 μmol m−2 s−1 (Wetzel and Likens 2000). Photosynthetically active radiation (PAR, 400–700 nm) was considered to be 47 % of global radiation (Wetzel and Likens 2000). Underwater light intensity was calculated for each mm of the water column using the vertical light attenuation coefficient determined by the empirical formula of V.-Balogh et al. (2009) on the basis of the chlorophyll a concentration, total suspended solids and Pt colour. Light attenuation of the ice cover was also taken into account. Areal primary production can thus be estimated for each hour, assuming that (1) photoautotrophic picoplankton is able to yield net photosynthesis at light intensities as low as 2 μmol m−2 s−1, and (2) the P–I curve is constant throughout the day.
DNA-based identification of phytoplankton community members
Extraction of total plankton genomic DNA was performed from a concentrated water sample collected at station 4 (centrifugation at 3000 g, 10 min) with the UltraClean™ Soil DNA Isolation Kit (MoBio Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA, USA) with slight modifications on the instructions given by the manufacturer as described in Borsodi et al. (2013). An approximately 1000 nt length fragment of the 18S rRNA gene was amplified by PCR using primers Euk328F and Chlo02R as described in Somogyi et al. (2013). Amplicons were examined by electrophoresis in 1 % (w/v) agarose gel stained with GR Safe DNA Stain (Innovita, Gaithersburg, MD, USA). Prior to cloning and sequence analysis, PCR products were purified with the EZ-10 Spin Column PCR Product Purification Kit (Bio Basic, Markham, Canada). Clone library construction was performed with the pGEM-T Easy Vector System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according to the instructions given by the manufacturer. Sequence analysis was performed with clones having different restriction pattern generated with the endonucleases Csp6I and Hin6I (Fermentas, Vilnius, Lithuania). A Chlorophyta-specific denaturant gradient gel electrophoresis analysis (DGGE) with a gradient of denaturants from 40 to 70 % was also carried out using a shorter fragment (approximately 400 nt length) amplified with primers Euk528F and Chlo02R as described by Keresztes et al. (2012). Sequencing reaction and capillary electrophoresis were performed by Biomi Ltd. (Gödöllő, Hungary). Trebouxiophycean clones were sequenced from both directions using primers M13F and M13R, while sequencing the DNA excised from dominant DGGE bands were performed with primer Chlo02R. Chromatograms were analysed as described in Felföldi et al. (2009). Chimeric sequences were removed using mothur (Schloss et al. 2009). Sequence alignment of clones and sequences obtained from GenBank was performed with SINA (Pruesse et al. 2012), and phylogenetic analysis including the search for the best-fit model was conducted with the MEGA 5 software (Tamura et al. 2011). Chlorophyte clone sequences obtained in this study were submitted to GenBank under the accession numbers KC879102-KC879111.
Results and discussion
Physical and chemical characteristics
Basic physical and chemical data of the stations measured on the day of the sampling are presented in Tables 1 and 2. Average water depth of the pan was 29 cm, while ice cover thickness varied between 6 and 25 cm among the sampling stations (Table 1). Little variation was observed in pH with an average of 9.63, conductivity varied between a minimum of 8260 and a maximum of 9450 μS cm−1, which is basically similar to the values measured during former studies on the lakes of this area (Felföldi et al. 2009; Somogyi et al. 2009). This high ion concentration indicated by the conductivity values allowed for water temperatures mostly below 0 °C. DO concentration showed supersaturation (129–157 %), suggesting net phytoplankton photosynthesis under the ice cover.
TSS generally exceeded 100 mg l−1, except at stations 2 and 5 with 56 and 94.5 mg l−1, respectively (Table 2). CDOM concentration, expressed as Pt units, showed little variation with an average of 240 mg l−1. Urea–N was the dominant N form, and SRP constituted a large part of the TP pool varying between 2233 and 3176 μg l−1. The amount of biologically available P was one order of magnitude higher than that of the sum of the N forms, however, both N and P concentrations show that phytoplankton is not limited by nutrients, mainly due to the substantial external loads from aquatic birds (Boros et al. 2008).
Picoeukaryote abundance and primary production
Chlorophyll a concentration reached exceedingly high levels of 743–1039 μg l−1 (Table 3), which, together with the TP concentration, implies strongly hypertrophic conditions. The phytoplankton was exclusively composed of photoautotrophic picoplankton (nano- and microplankton were not found). Chlorophyll a content varied between 0.7 and 1.0 % of total biomass. In other shallow lakes of the region average relative chlorophyll a content of the phytoplankton varied between 0.25 and 0.78 % (Vörös and Padisák 1991). Since chlorophyll a content per unit biomass is inversely related to cell volume, we may assume that the higher values found in Zab-szék pan may be associated with the smaller average cell size in the community. On the other hand, extremely low light intensity can also cause increased cellular chlorophyll a content regardless of cell size. High chlorophyll contents per biovolume were also found in the deep hypolimnion of a high mountain lake during the winter cover period associated with small cells (Felip and Catalan 2000). The abundance of PPP in Zab-szék pan showed high values ranging from 42 to 82 × 106 cells ml−1 and consisted of single-celled picoeukaryotes. Similar values were found in winter 2006–2007 (Somogyi et al. 2009), which implies that this winter picoeukaryote bloom is a regularly occurring phenomenon in this pan.
Just as in the present study, winter photoautotrophic picoplankton assemblages have generally been found to be eukaryotic in other lakes, such as in the case of the large, shallow Lake Balaton. However, the maximum abundance of that PPP community was two orders of magnitude smaller than the values presented here (Vörös et al. 2009). Other saline lakes at various locations around the globe can similarly be favourable habitats for photoautotrophic picoplankton blooms (Fanjing et al. 2009; Wu et al. 2009; Krienitz et al. 2012), although some lakes have been found to be dominated also by other taxa above the pico size range (García et al. 1997; Harper et al. 2003; Schagerl and Oduor 2008). In several East African soda lakes, picoeukaryote abundances can exceed 3 million cells ml−1 (Krienitz et al. 2012), while Fanjing et al. (2009) found a pico-sized green alga (Picocystis sp.) in a Mongolian soda lake in high abundance throughout the year, even under the ice, which interestingly resembles the situation presented here.
As seen on the photosynthesis–irradiance (P–I) curve in Fig. 2, the maximum photosynthetic rate of the picoeukaryote community was moderately low, reaching 1.4 μg C μg chlorophyll a −1 h−1 at 125 μmol m−2 s−1. The day of the sampling was overcast, which caused low light intensity values with a daily maximum of ~400 μmol m−2 s−1. The ice cover dramatically reduced ambient PAR by 96 % on average, which meant a maximum light intensity of 18.2 μmol m−2 s−1 under the ice (Fig. 3), rapidly decreasing with depth. These light intensity values clearly show that the community was extremely light-limited. Winter primary production in this alkaline pan is primarily dependent on the amount of light rather than on nutrient availability, the same way as it was found in an ice-covered humic, boreal lake (Tulonen et al. 1994). On the basis of the P–I curve (Fig. 2) and assuming that the picoeukaryotes can potentially utilize PAR intensity as low as 2 μmol m−2 s−1, estimated areal primary production shows a maximum of 30 mg C m−2 h−1 and a daily sum of 180 mg C m−2 d−1 in Zab-szék pan, although this value can vary considerably as a function of ambient light intensity and also due to temporal changes in the P–I relationship. Similar winter values of 100–140 mg C m−2 d−1 were found in the mesotrophic eastern basin of Lake Balaton (Herodek and Tamás 1976; Herodek et al. 1982), in spite of a much smaller phytoplankton biomass, since lower light attenuation resulted in higher assimilation rates (1–4 μg C μg chl a −1 h−1) along a substantially deeper water column of 3.5 m. Even higher winter assimilation rates can be found in marine photoautotrophic picoplankton, such as those reported by Han and Furuya (2000), however, both temperature and light attenuation were more moderate and favourable for photosynthesis. In comparison, the particularly low light conditions and temperature under the ice cover of the Zab-szék pan potentiated approximately 0.5 μg C μg chl a −1 h−1 at most for the picoeukaryotic community, which decreased to a negligible amount within the upper 10 cm. The ability of these picoeukaryotes to yield net primary production and reach such a high abundance under these extreme conditions within a few centimetres of water column makes this community particularly unique.
Community composition
In total, 85 clones were analysed, which formed 37 clone groups based on their different restriction pattern. After removing putative chimeric sequences (6.3 % of total number of clones), 23.8 % of clones were affiliated with green algae. Most chlorophyte sequences (94.6 %) were related to Trebouxiophycean isolates and formed three groups on the phylogenetic tree (Fig. 4). The main clone group (containing 42.1 % of green algal clones, represented by clones AV-5, AV-12, AV-23 and AV-36) formed a cluster distant from all known strains, and showed the highest pairwise similarity values, 96.7–98.0 %, to Micractinium pusillum SAG 48.93 or ‘Nannochloris’ sp. AS 2–10. Within this cluster, similarity ranged from 97.1 to 99.2 %. Although there is no general pairwise similarity value of 18S rRNA gene that defines trebouxiophycean genera, similarity values around 97–98 % were accepted as genus level divergence among isolates in taxonomic revisions or recent species descriptions (Henley et al. 2004; Krienitz et al. 2004; Somogyi et al. 2011, 2013). Therefore, this cluster may represent one or two previously unidentified genera.
Another group, represented with clones AV-17 and AV-60 showed 98.1–98.7 % nucleotide similarity values with Marvania species. The third group of Zab-szék clones, was affiliated with the recently described Chloroparva and the revised Pseudochloris genera (Somogyi et al. 2011, 2013) with relatively low pairwise similarity values, 97.3–97.9 %, and, therefore, represented additional potential new species or genera. Type strain of Chloroparva pannonica was isolated from a soda pan in the same region close to Zab-szék (Somogyi et al. 2011), an additional isolate from this genus was retrieved from Zab-szék itself (ACT 0602) and Pseudochloris isolates also originated from saline (marine) habitats (Henley et al. 2004; Somogyi et al. 2013).
The sequence of clone AV-16 showed 97.6 % pairwise nucleotide sequence similarity to the small green flagellate, Marsupiomonas pelliculata PCC 441 (Pedinophyceae). Cells of this species are slightly larger than the picoplankton size, and have an approximate length of 3.0 μm, width of 2.3 μm and maximum thickness of 1.8 μm with a single 8–10 μm long flagellum (Jones et al. 1994). Members of this genus are inhabitants of marine and brackish environments, and are able to grow up to 3.8 % salinity (Jones et al. 1994; Vaulot et al. 2008).
All other clones were distantly related to protists or invertebrates, most of these clones shared typical pairwise similarity values of 90–93 % with cercozoan sequences (data not shown). Since there are known potential biases associated with the cloning of DNA fragments having different length (i.e. due to introns that may be present in the 18S rRNA gene of green algae; Palatinszky et al. 2011; Somogyi et al. 2011), and additionally the relatively low number of phytoplankton clones did not allow proper quantitative comparison of phototrophic taxa present in the sample, a DGGE analysis was also carried out. There were two major bands observable in the gel (data not shown). The shorter sequences from the excised bands (approximately 350 nt compared to the approximate 950 nt length of clone sequences) provided limited phylogenetic information as compared to the sequence analysis of clones, but on the other hand, revealed the two major green algal genotypes of the sample. One of these two dominant DGGE bands was identical with the sequence of clone AV-16, while the other major band was identical with clone AV-5 (data not shown).
The detected various chlorophyte genotypes indicated a genetically heterogenous community of phototrophic picoeukaryotes in Zab-szék pan. Our previous study focusing on picocyanobacteria in the soda pans of the same region also found relatively diverse communities (Felföldi et al. 2009). Similarly to our results, potentially new chlorophyte taxa were also described by Luo et al. (2013) in an African soda lake (Lake Nakuru), which suggest that the biodiversity of these unique water bodies is still unrevealed.
Conclusions
Our results on the picoeukaryote community in the alkaline pan Zab-szék in winter 2012 have shown that these organisms have the potential to actively photosynthesize and reach extraordinarily high abundance under multiple environmental stress conditions. Instead of the well-known picoeukaryote inhabitants of saline lakes and ponds, such as the members of the genera Picochlorum and Picocystis (Lewin et al. 2000; Henley et al. 2004; Fanjing et al. 2009; Wu et al. 2009; Krienitz et al. 2012), Chloroparva pannonica has been found to be the only characteristic species of these alkaline pans until now. On the other hand, the present study has found a genetically diverse community with a relatively high number of previously unidentified green algal taxa.
The formation of such a winter community may be caused by the combination of various factors, e.g. high inorganic nutrient content (Boros et al. 2008) and the putative lack of efficient grazers at low temperature (simultaneous absence of bottom-up and top-down control). One could also raise the question: What enables these picoeukaryotes to gain absolute dominance in these hypertrophic water bodies? This may be the outcome of adaptation to this peculiar environment, however, this assumption cannot be confirmed on the basis of a single sampling and without more sophisticated laboratory experiments. Testing this hypothesis would require a comprehensive ecophysiological study on the isolated strains representing the community, with a focus on the effect of light, temperature and salinity on the enzyme content and/or activity of the cells. A comparison with phylogenetically related taxa from other habitats would also be desirable.
References
Bec B, Collos Y, Souchu P, Vaquer A, Lautier J, Fiandrino A, Benau L, Orsoni V, Laugier T (2011) Distribution of picophytoplankton and nanophytoplankton along an anthropogenic eutrophication gradient in French Mediterranean coastal lagoons. Aquat Microb Ecol 63:29–45
Boros E, Nagy T, Pigniczki C, Kotymán L, V-Balogh K, Vörös L (2008) The effect of aquatic birds on the nutrient load and water quality of soda pans in Hungary. Acta Zool Hung 54:207–224
Borsodi AK, Felföldi T, Máthé I, Bognár V, Knáb M, Krett G, Jurecska L, Tóth EM, Márialigeti K (2013) Phylogenetic diversity of bacterial and archaeal communities inhabiting the saline Lake Red located in Sovata, Romania. Extremophiles 17:87–98
Callieri C, Stockner G (2002) Freshwater autotrophic picoplankton: a review. J Limnol 61:1–14
Callieri C (2008) Picophytoplankton in freshwater ecosystems: the importance of small-sized phototrophs. Freshwat Rev 1:1–28
Cuthbert ID, del Giorgio P (1992) Toward a standard method of measuring color in freshwater. Limnol Oceanogr 37:1319–1326
Eilers PHC, Peeters JCH (1988) A model for the relationship between light intensity and the rate of photosynthesis in phytoplankton. Ecol Model 42:199–215
Elliott RJ, Porter AG (1971) A rapid cadmium reduction method for the determination of nitrate in bacon and curing brines. Analyst 96:522–527
Fanjing K, Qinxian J, Jia E, Mianping Z (2009) Characterization of a eukaryotic picoplankton alga, strain DGN-Z1, isolated from a soda lake in Inner Mongolia, China. Nat Resour Env Iss 15:185–189
Felföldi T, Somogyi B, Márialigeti K, Vörös L (2009) Characterization of photoautotrophic picoplankton assemblages in turbid, alkaline lakes of the Carpathian Basin (Central Europe). J Limnol 68:385–395
Felip M, Catalan J (2000) The relationship between phytoplankton biovolume and chlorophyll in a deep oligotrophic lake: decoupling in their spatial and temporal maxima. J Plankton Res 22:91–105
Gales MEJR, Julian EC, Kroner RC (1966) Method for quantitative determination of total phosphorus in water. J Amer Water Works Assoc 58:1363–1368
García CM, García-Ruiz R, Rendón M, Niell FX, Lucena J (1997) Hydrological cycle and interannual variability of the aquatic community in a temporary saline lake (Fuente de Piedra, Southern Spain). Hydrobiologia 345:131–141
Gaulke AK, Wetz MS, Paerl HW (2010) Picophytoplankton: a major contributor to planktonic biomass and primary production in a eutrophic, river-dominated estuary. Estuar Coast Shelf S 90:45–54
Han M-S, Furuya K (2000) Size and species-specific primary production and community structure of phytoplankton in Tokyo Bay. J Plankton Res 22:1221–1235
Harper DM, Childress RB, Harper MM, Boar RR, Hickley PH, Mills SC, Otieno N, Drane T, Vareschi E, Nasirwa O, Mwatha WE, Darlington JPEC, Escuté-Gasulla X (2003) Aquatic biodiversity and saline lakes: Lake Bogoria National Reserve, Kenya. Hydrobiologia 500:259–276
Henley WJ, Hironaka JL, Guillou L, Buchheim MA, Buchheim JA, Fawley MW, Fawley KP (2004) Phylogenetic analysis of the ‘Nannochloris-like’ algae and diagnoses of Picochlorum oklahomensis gen. et sp. nov (Trebouxiophyceae, Chlorophyta). Phycologia 43:641–652
Herodek S, Tamás G (1976) A fitoplankton tömege, termelése és a Balaton eutrofizálódása. Hidrológiai Közlöny 56(5):219–228
Herodek S, Vörös L, Tóth F (1982) The mass and production of phytoplankton and the eutrophication of Lake Balaton. Hidrológiai Közlöny 62(5):220–229 (in Hungarian with English summary)
Jones HLJ, Leadbeater BSC, Green JC (1994) An ultrastructural study of Marsupiomonas pelliculata gen. et sp. nov., a new member of the Pedinophyceae. Eur J Phycol 29:171–181
Keresztes ZG, Felföldi T, Somogyi B, Székely G, Dragoş N, Márialigeti K, Bartha C, Vörös L (2012) First record of picophytoplankton diversity in Central European hypersaline lakes. Extremophiles 16:759–769
Kirk JTO (1996) Light and photosynthesis in aquatic ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Krienitz L, Hegewald EH, Hepperle D, Huss VAR, Rohr T, Wolf M (2004) Phylogenetic relationship of Chlorella and Parachlorella gen. nov. (Chlorophyta, Trebouxiophyceae). Phycologia 43:529–542
Krienitz L, Bock C, Kotut K, Luo W (2012) Picocystis salinarum (Chlorophyta) in saline lakes and hot springs of East Africa. Phycologia 51:22–32
Lewin RA, Krienitz L, Goericke R, Takeda H, Hepperle D (2000) Picocystis salinarum gen. et sp. nov. (Chlorophyta)—a new picoplanktonic green alga. Phycologia 39:560–565
Luo W, Kotut K, Krienitz L (2013) Hidden diversity of eukaryotic plankton in the soda lake Nakuru, Kenya, during a phase of low salinity revealed by a SSU rRNA gene clone library. Hydrobiologia 702:95–103
MacIsaac EA, Stockner JG (1993) Enumeration of phototrophic picoplankton by autofluorescence microscopy. In: Kemp PF, Sherr BF, Sherr EB, Cole JJ (eds) Handbook of methods in aquatic microbial ecology. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, pp 187–197
Mackereth FJH, Heron J, Talling JF (1989) Water analysis: some revised methods for limnologists. Freshwater Biological Association Scientific Publications, Ambleside
Mózes A, Présing M, Vörös L (2006) Seasonal dynamics of picocyanobacteria and picoeukaryotes in a large shallow lake (Lake Balaton, Hungary). Int Rev Hydrobiol 91:38–50
Murphy J, Riley JP (1962) A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal Chim Acta 27:31–36
Newell BS, Morgan B, Candy J (1967) The determination of urea in seawater. J Mar Res 25:201–202
Palatinszky M, Nikolausz M, Sváb D, Márialigeti K (2011) Preferential ligation during TA-cloning of multitemplate PCR products: a factor causing bias in microbial community structure analysis. J Microbiol Meth 85:131–136
Pruesse E, Peplies J, Glöckner FO (2012) SINA: accurate high throughput multiple sequence alignment of ribosomal RNA genes. Bioinformatics 28:1823–1829
Schagerl M, Oduor SO (2008) Phytoplankton community relationship to environmental variables in three Kenyan Rift Valley saline-alkaline lakes. Mar Freshwater Res 47:189–197
Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB, Lesniewski RA, Oakley BB, Parks DH, Robinson CJ, Sahl JW, Stres B, Thallinger GG, Van Horn DJ, Weber CF (2009) Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:7537–7541
Somogyi B, Felföldi T, Vanyovszki J, Ágyi Á, Márialigeti K, Vörös L (2009) Winter bloom of picoeukaryotes in Hungarian shallow turbid soda pans and the role of light and temperature. Aquat Ecol 43:735–744
Somogyi B, Felföldi T, Solymosi K, Makk J, Homonnay ZG, Horváth G, Turcsi E, Böddi B, Márialigeti K, Vörös L (2011) Chloroparva pannonica gen. et sp. nov. (Trebouxiophyceae, Chlorophyta): a new picoplanktonic green alga from a turbid, shallow soda pan. Phycologia 50:1–10
Somogyi B, Felföldi T, Solymosi K, Flieger K, Márialigeti K, Böddi B, Vörös L (2013) One step closer to eliminating nomenclatural problems of minute coccoid green algae: Pseudochloris wilhelmii gen. et sp. nov. (Trebouxiophyceae, Chlorophyta) Eur J Phycol 48:427–436
Steemann Nielsen E (1952) The use of radioactive carbon (C-14) for measuring organic production in the sea. J Conseil Perm Int Pour L’Explor De La Mer 18:117–140
Stockner JG, Antia NJ (1986) Algal picoplankton from marine and freshwater: a multidisciplinary perspective. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 43:2472–2503
Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28:2731–2739
Tulonen T, Kankaala P, Ojala A, Arvola L (1994) Factors controlling production of phytoplankton and bacteria under ice in a humic, boreal lake. J Plankton Res 16:1411–1432
V.-Balogh K, Németh B, Vörös L (2009) Specific attenuation coefficients of optically active substances and their contribution to the underwater ultraviolet and visible light climate in shallow lakes and ponds. Hydrobiologia 632:91–105
Vaulot D, Eikrem W, Viprey M, Moreau H (2008) The diversity of small eukaryotic phytoplankton (≤3 μm) in marine ecosystems. FEMS Microbiol Rev 32:795–820
Vörös L, Gulyás P, Németh J (1991) Occurrence, dynamics and production of picoplankton in Hungarian shallow lakes. Int Rev Hydrobiol 76:617–629
Vörös L, Padisák J (1991) Phytoplankton biomass and chlorophyll-a in some shallow lakes in central Europe. Hydrobiologia 215:111–119
Vörös L, V-Balogh K, Boros E (2005) Picoplankton predominance in soda lakes. Hidrológiai Közlöny 85(6):166–168 (in Hungarian with English summary)
Vörös L, Boros E, Schmidt A, V.-Balogh K, Németh B, Somogyi B, Mózes A (2006) Physical and chemical environment of phytoplankton in soda pans having white coloured water. Hidrológiai Közlöny 86(6):139–141 (in Hungarian with English summary)
Vörös L, Mózes A, Somogyi B (2009) A five-year study of autotrophic winter pikoplankton in Lake Balaton, Hungary. Aquat Ecol 43:727–734
Winder M (2009) Photosynthetic picoplankton dynamics in Lake Tahoe: temporal and spatial niche partitioning among prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. J Plankton Res 31:1307–1320
Wellburn AR (1994) The spectral determination of chlorophylls a and b, as well as total carotenoids, using various solvents with spectrophotometers of different resolution. J Plant Physiol 144:307–313
Wetzel RG, Likens GE (2000) Limnological analyses. Springer, New York
Wu QL, Chatzinotas A, Wang J, Boenigk J (2009) Genetic diversity of eukaryotic plankton assemblages in Eastern Tibetan lakes differing by their salinity and Altitude. Microb Ecol 58:569–581
Acknowledgments
The authors are gratefully indebted to Balázs Németh, Zsolt Gyula Keresztes, Tamás Sápi and Éva Koltai for technical assistance. This work was financially supported by the NKTH-OTKA CNK 80140 and the EnvEurope Life Environment LIFE08ENV/IT/000339 projects. B.S. and T.F. were supported by the Bolyai János Research Grant (Hungarian Academy of Sciences).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by M. da Costa.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pálffy, K., Felföldi, T., Mentes, A. et al. Unique picoeukaryotic algal community under multiple environmental stress conditions in a shallow, alkaline pan. Extremophiles 18, 111–119 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00792-013-0602-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00792-013-0602-0