Abstract
Background
There are several surgical techniques currently employed to treat thoracolumbar burst fractures, including anterior fixation, posterior fixation, or combined anterior-posterior fixation. Biomechanical analysis of the various types of surgical techniques is therefore critical to enable selection of the appropriate surgical method for successful spinal fusion. However, the effects of the various spinal fusion techniques on spinal stiffness have not been clearly defined, and the strengths and weaknesses of each fusion technique are still controversial.
Methods
The biomechanical effects of increasing the number of anterior rods and removing the mid-column in anterior fixation, posterior fixation, and combined anterior-posterior fixation on spinal stiffness in thoracolumbar burst fractures was investigated. Finite element analysis was used to investigate the effects of the three fusion methods on spine biomechanics because of its ability to control for variables related to the material and experimental environment.
Results
The stiffness of the fused spinal junction highly correlates with the selection of an additional posterior fixation. The mid-column decompression showed a significant change in stiffness, although the effect of decompression was much less than that with the application of posterior fixation and the anterior rod number. In addition, two-rod anterior fixation without additional posterior fixation is able to provide enough spinal stability; and one-rod anterior fixation with posterior fixation yields better results in regard to preventing excessive motion and ensuring spinal stability.
Conclusions
The present study shows that careful consideration is necessary when choosing the anterior rod number and applying posterior fixation and mid-column decompression during surgical treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Wood KB, Bohn D, Mehbod A. Anterior versus posterior treatment of stable thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurologic deficit. J Spinal Disord Tech 2005;18:S15–S23.
Dai LY, Jiang SD, Wang XY, Jiang LS. A review of the management of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Surg Neurol 2007;67:221–231.
Goto K, Tajima N, Chosa E, Totoribe K, Kubo S, Kuroki H, et al. Effects of lumbar spinal fusion on the other lumbar intervertebral levels (three-dimensional finite element analysis). J Orthop Sci 2003;8:577–584.
Natarajan RN, Garretson RB 3rd, Biyani A, Lim TH, Andersson GB, An HS. Effects of slip severity and loading directions on the stability of isthmic spondylolisthesis: a finite element model study. Spine 2003;28:1103–1112.
Natarajan RN, Andersson GB. The influence of lumbar disc height and cross-sectional area on the mechanical response of the disc to physiologic loading. Spine 1999;24:1873–1881.
Argoubi M, Shirazi-Adl A. Poroelastic creep response analysis of a lumbar motion segment in compression. J Biomech 1996;29:1331–1339.
Lu YM, Hutton WC, Gharpuray VM. Do bending, twisting, and diurnal fluid changes in the disc affect the propensity to prolapse? A viscoelastic finite element model. Spine 1996;21:2570–2579.
Campbell-Kyureghyan N, Jorgensen M, Burr D, Marras W. The prediction of lumbar spine geometry: method development and validation. Clin Biomech 2005;20:455–464.
Polikeit A, Ferguson SJ, Nolte LP, Orr TE. Factors influencing stresses in the lumbar spine after the insertion of intervertebral cages: finite element analysis. Eur Spine J 2003;12:413–420.
Zhong ZC, Wei SH, Wang JP, Feng CK, Chen CS, Yu CH. Finite element analysis of the lumbar spine with a new cage using a topology optimization method. Med Eng Phys 2006;28:90–98.
Goel VK, Ramirez SA, Kong W, Gilbertson LG. Cancellous bone young’s modulus variation within the vertebral body of a ligamentous lumbar spine: application of bone adaptive remodeling concepts. J Biomech Eng 1995;117:266–271.
White AA, Panjabi MM. Clinical biomechanics of the spine, 2nd edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1990.
Panjabi MM, Oxland TR, Yamamoto I, Crisco JJ. Mechanical behavior of the human lumbar and lumbosacral spine as shown by three-dimensional load-displacement curves. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1994;76:413–424.
Wang JL, Parnianpour M, Shirazi-Adl A, Engin AE, Li S, Patwardhan A. Development and validation of a viscoelastic finite element model of an L2/L3 motion segment. Theor Appl Fract Mec 1997;28:81–93.
Knop C, Lange U, Bastian L, Blauth M. Three-dimensional motion analysis with Synex: comparative biomechanical test series with a new vertebral body replacement for the thoracolumbar spine. Eur Spine J 2000;9:472–485.
Kanayama M, Ng JT, Cunningham BW, Abumi K, Kaneda K, McAfee PC. Biomechanical analysis of anterior versus circumferential spinal reconstruction for various anatomic stages of tumor lesions. Spine 1999;24:445–450.
Carl AL, Tranmer BI, Sachs BL. Anterolateral dynamized instrumentation and fusion for unstable thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures. Spine 1997;22:686–690.
McDonough PW, Davis R, Tribus C, Zdeblick TA. The management of acute thoracolumbar burst fractures with anterior corpectomy and Z-plate fixation. Spine 2004;29:1901–1909.
Schreiber U, Bence T, Grupp T, Steinhauser E, Mückley T, Mittelmeier W, et al. Is a single anterolateral screw-plate fixation sufficient for the treatment of spinal fractures in the thoracolumbar junction? A biomechanical in vitro investigation. Eur Spine J 2005;14:197–204.
Payer M. Unstable burst fractures of the thoraco-lumbar junction, treatment by posterior bisegmental correction/fixation and staged anterior corpectomy and titanium cage implantation. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2006;148:299–306.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Park, W.M., Park, YS., Kim, K. et al. Biomechanical comparison of instrumentation techniques in treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures: a finite element analysis. J Orthop Sci 14, 443–449 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-009-1341-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-009-1341-z