Abstract
Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) inhibit myogenesis and induce osteoblastic differentiation in myoblasts. They also induce the transcription of several common genes, such as Id1, Id2 and Id3, in various cell types. We have reported that a GC-rich element in the Id1 gene functions as a BMP-responsive element (BRE) that is regulated by Smads. In this study, we analyzed and identified BREs in the 5′-flanking regions of the mouse Id2 and Id3 genes. The core GGCGCC sequence was conserved among the BREs in the Id1, Id2 and Id3 genes and was essential for the response to BMP signaling via Smads. We found a novel BRE on mouse chromosome 13 at position 47,723,740–47,723,768 by searching for conserved sequences containing the Id1 BRE. This potential BRE was found in the 5′-flanking region of a novel gene that produces a non-coding transcript, termed BMP-inducible transcript-1 (BIT-1), and this element regulated the expression of this gene in response to BMP signaling. We found that BIT-1 is expressed in BMP target tissues such as the testis, brain, kidney and cartilage. These findings suggest that the transcriptional induction of the Ids, BIT-1 and additional novel genes containing the conserved BRE sequence may play an important role in the regulation of the differentiation and/or function of target cells in response to BMPs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are multifunctional growth factors that are members of the transforming growth factor-β family [1]. They exhibit unique activity in bone matrix that is characterized by ectopic bone formation in muscle tissues in vivo [2]. BMPs inhibit the myogenic differentiation of myoblasts and induce osteogenic differentiation into osteoblastic lineage cells in vitro [3]. They physiologically regulate not only bone formation but also the development and regeneration of various tissues in vertebrates and lower animals [4].
BMP signaling is transduced by two different transmembrane serine/threonine kinase receptors—the type I and type II receptors [5, 6]. The BMP-bound type II receptor kinase phosphorylates the type I receptor. The activated BMP type I receptor kinase subsequently phosphorylates a serine–valine–serine motif at the C-termini of Smad1, Smad5 and Smad8, which are BMP receptor-regulated Smads (R-Smads). The phosphorylated R-Smads form heteromeric complexes with Smad4 and translocate into the nucleus to directly regulate the transcription of target genes.
The Id family members are negative regulators of myogenesis that have a common helix–loop–helix structure, and their genes have been shown to be typical early response genes of BMP signaling in various cell types [7–9]. A GC-rich 29-bp element in the 5′ enhancer region of the Id1 gene was identified as the BMP-responsive element (BRE), which is recognized by a complex of Smad1/5 and Smad4 in response to the activation of the BMP type I receptor [7]. Mad, a Drosophila homolog of mammalian Smad1, also binds to a GC-rich sequence in target genes [10, 11]. Additional GC-rich elements have been found in the target genes of BMPs [10–14].
In the present study, we analyzed functional BREs in the mouse Id2 and Id3 genes. We identified the conserved GGCGCC sequence in the BREs of the Id1-Id3 genes, which are recognized by Smad1 and Smad4 in response to BMP-4. Moreover, we found a novel BRE by searching the mouse genome for a region homologous to the Id1 BRE. This novel BRE regulates the transcription of a novel non-coding BMP-inducible transcript, termed BIT-1, that is mainly expressed in the testis, brain, kidney and cartilage in mice.
Materials and methods
Plasmid constructs
To construct the luciferase reporter plasmids, 3.1-, 5.7- and 0.8-kb fragments from the 5′ regions of the mouse Id2 and Id3 genes and BIT-1, respectively, were inserted between the KpnI and EcoRV sites of pGL4.14 (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) by a standard polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method using PrimeStar HS DNA polymerase (TaKaRa, Shiga, Japan) with mouse genomic DNA as a template. The primer sequences were as follows: 5′-atggtaccCTTCTGCCAAGGAAGAGTTC-3′ (mId2-5KpnI), 5′-atgatatcACCAGGCTCGGTTCAGAATG-3′ (mId2-3EcoRV), 5′-atggtaccGAGTGCTGAGACTGTTAAGTAT-3′ (mId3-5KpnI), 5′-atgatatcCCTAAAGCAAACAGTGC-3′ (mId3-3EcoRV), 5′-atggtaccGCACAAGTAGTTATGGAGAC-3′ (BIT-1-5KpnI) and 5′-atgatatcACAGAACCTCGGAGACTGAC-3′ (BIT-1-3EcoRV) (lowercase letters indicate the flanking sequence). Deletion mutants were generated by PCR using each specific upper primer and the mId2-3EcoRV and mId3-3EcoRV primers with Id2(3.1)-luc and Id3(5.7)-luc as templates, respectively. To generate Id2WT4F-luc, Id3WT4F-luc, Id2WT4R-luc, Id3WT4R-luc, Id2MUT4F-luc, Id3MUT4F-luc and the novel BREWT4F-luc, four tandem repeats of the specific wild-type or mutant DNA sequences of the 34-bp Id2 BRE, 35-bp Id3 BRE or 29-bp novel BRE were synthesized (TaKaRa). These repeat sequences were then subcloned into the HindIII recognition site of pGL4.26 (Promega). The sequences of the BREs are as follows: 5′-TTGCTATGGCAGCCGCCTGAGCGGCGCCGCGAGG-3′ (Id2WT), 5′-TTGCTATGGCAGCCGCCTGAGCTTTGCCGCGAGG-3′ (Id2MUT), 5′-ATGACGTCCCACCCTGGCGCCAGGCTGTCTGGGGC-3′ (Id3WT), 5′-ATGACGTCCCACCCTTTTGCCAGGCTGTCTGGGGC-3′ (Id3MUT) and 5′-CAGAGCGACCGCCCGGCCGGCGCCAGCAG-3′ (novel BRE) (the underlined regions indicate mutations). Id2-2867MUT-luc and Id3-3304MUT-luc were constructed via a standard PCR technique using the following primers: 5′-CAGCCGCCTGAGCTTTGCCGCGAGGACAAG-3′ (Id2-2867MUT-luc sense), 5′-CTTGTCCTCGCGGCAAAGCTCAGGCGGCTG-3′ (Id2-2867MUT-luc anti-sense), 5′-CGTCCCACCCTTTTGCCAGGCTGTCTGGGG-3′ (Id3-3303MUT-luc sense) and 5′-CCCCAGACAGCCTGGCAAAAGGGTGGGACG-3′ (Id3-3303MUT-luc anti-sense). Mouse Smad1 and Smad4 expression vectors have been described previously [7]. Mouse Rp58 (GenBank ID 30928) was obtained using standard reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR techniques with PrimeStar HS DNA polymerase (TaKaRa) and cloned into the pcDEF3 expression vector [15]. The DNA sequence of each construct was confirmed by DNA sequencing using an ABI3500 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA).
Cell culture, transfection and luciferase assay
C2C12 mouse myoblasts were maintained as previously described [3]. Primary osteoblasts were prepared from newborn mouse calvaria as described previously [16]. Cells in a 96-well plate were transfected with 200 ng/well of plasmid DNA using 0.5 μl/well of Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) as described previously [7]. The luciferase reporter assay was performed using the Dual-Glo Luciferase Assay system (Promega), luciferase reporter plasmids and phRL-SV40 (Promega) in the presence and absence of 10 ng/ml BMP-4 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) with or without 100 nM LDN193189 (Stemgent, San Diego, CA, USA) for 24 h as previously described [7].
Electrophoretic mobility shift assay
Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) were performed as previously described [7, 17]. Oligonucleotides were labeled with the Biotin 3′ End DNA Labeling Kit (Thermo, Rockford, IL, USA). The DNA binding reaction was performed for 20 min at room temperature in 20 μl of binding buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5; 50 mM KCl; 5 mM MgCl2; 1 mM dithiothreitol; 0.05 % Nonidet P-40; 2.5 % glycerol), 1 μg of poly(dI-dC), 100 fmol of biotin-labeled DNA and 10 μg of nuclear extract proteins. For supershift experiments, antibodies were added prior to the addition of the probe and incubated for 1 h at 4 °C. Antibodies against Smad1 (Invitrogen) and Smad4 (B-8; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) were used. For the competition experiments, the unlabeled double-stranded oligonucleotides were added to the mixtures at room temperature 30 min prior to the addition of the labeled probe. The sequences of the oligonucleotides used are as follows: 5′-CATGGCGACCGCCCGCGCGGCGCCAGCCT-3′ (Id1 wild-type BRE), 5′-CATGGCGACCGCCCGCGCTTTGCCAGCCT-3′ (Id1 mutant BRE), 5′-TTGCTATGGCAGCCGCCTGAGCGGCGCCGCGAGG-3′ (Id2 wild-type BRE), 5′-TTGCTATGGCAGCCGCCTGAGCTTTGCCGCGAGG-3′ (Id2 mutant BRE), 5′-ATGACGTCCCACCCTGGCGCCAGGCTGTCTGGGGC-3′ (Id3 wild-type BRE), 5′-ATGACGTCCCACCCTTTTGCCAGGCTGTCTGGGGC-3′ (Id3 mutant BRE) and 5′-CAGAGCGACCGCCCGGCCGGCGCCAGCAG-3′ (wild-type novel BRE) (the underlined regions indicate mutations). The samples were subjected to electrophoresis on a native 5 % acrylamide/0.5 × Tris-borate/EDTA gel and transferred to a nylon membrane. The biotin-labeled DNA was detected with the LightShift Chemiluminescent EMSA kit (Thermo).
Rapid amplification of cDNA ends
Rapid amplification of cDNA ends (3′ RACE) was performed using the 3′-Full RACE Core Set (TaKaRa). A library of adapter-ligated double-stranded cDNA was constructed from 1 μg of total RNA isolated from BMP-4-treated C2C12 cells according to the manufacturer’s instructions. To isolate the 3′-end of the BIT-1 cDNA, primer 1 (5′-GCTGGGGGGTCAGTCTCCGA-3′) and primer 2 (5′-CTTCAAGACTCCTCCTGAGG-3′) were designed from the sequence of the 3′-region of BIT-1. PCR reactions were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions using AMV Reverse Transcriptase XL (TaKaRa). The PCR product was subcloned into T-Vector pMD20 (TaKaRa) and sequenced using an ABI3500 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems).
RT-PCR analysis
Total RNA was prepared using TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen) and then reverse transcribed with SuperScript III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. PCR reactions were performed with GoTaq (Promega). The primer sets used are as follows: 5′-GGGTGTTGCTGGACAGTGCC-3′ (BIT-1 sense), 5′-CACTACCCTGAGCACCACCC-3′ (BIT-1 anti-sense), 5′-TCCTGCAGCATGTAATCGAC-3′ (mouse Id1 sense), 5′-GAGAGGGTGAGGCTCTGTTG-3′ (mouse Id1 anti-sense), 5′-CTCCAAGCTCAAGGAACTGG-3′ (mouse Id2 sense), 5′-CGCAACCCACACAGAACTTA-3′ (mouse Id2 anti-sense), 5′-CTCTTGGACGACATGAACCAC-3′ (mouse Id3 sense), 5′-AGTGAGCTCAGCTGTCTGGAT-3′ (mouse Id3 anti-sense), 5′-GAGAGGGAAATCGTGCGTGA-3′ (mouse β-actin sense) and 5′-ACATCTGCTGGAAGGTGGAC-3′ (mouse β-actin anti-sense).
Chromatin immunoprecipitation
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) was performed with a ChIP assay kit (Cell Signaling, Beverly, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions using antibodies against Smad1 (D59D7; Cell Signaling) and Smad4 (Cell Signaling). The purified DNA was analyzed by PCR using the following primers that detect sequences in the indicated promoter: 5′-TTCGCGCCCTAAGTCTGCAGGTG-3′ (Id1 promoter sense), 5′-AGGCCCGTGACGTCACCCATTC-3′ (Id1 promoter anti-sense), 5′-CCTTGCAGGCATTGATCAGCTG-3′ (Id2 promoter sense), 5′-GAGCCCCGGAGCAGACTCTCT-3′ (Id2 promoter anti-sense), 5′-GCTATTCACAAGCCGCTCGCCG-3′ (Id3 promoter sense), 5′-GCCCAGCTGTGGGTCCGGGTCC-3′ (Id3 promoter anti-sense), 5′-CCAAGCCTTGTTGCCTGTGAACG-3′ (BIT-1 promoter sense), and 5′-ACAGCTGATTCATTGGCTCGGC-3′ (BIT-1 promoter anti-sense).
Statistical analysis
Comparisons were made using an unpaired Student’s t test; the results are shown as the means ± SD. Statistical significance is indicated as *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01.
Results
Identification of functional BREs in the mouse Id2 and Id3 genes
To examine the transcriptional mechanism of BMP early response genes, we analyzed the BREs in the mouse Id2 gene using a series of luciferase reporters harboring fragments of the 5′-flanking region of the mouse Id2 gene. For Id2(3.1)-luc, but not Id2(2.7)- or Id2(2.0)-luc, luciferase was induced in response to BMP-4 in C2C12 cells (Fig. 1a). The response to BMP-4 was dependent on the 34-bp region between positions −2867 and −2821 in the Id2 gene (5′-TTGCTATGGCAGCCGCCTGAGCGGCGCCGCGAGG-3′), which contains the GGCGCC sequence identified in the BRE of the Id1 gene (Fig. 1b) [7–9]. In both the forward and reverse orientations, the 34-bp region of the Id2 gene was sufficient to respond to BMP-4 (Fig. 1c). Moreover, mutation of GGCGCC to TTTGCC in the 34-bp region reduced the response to BMP-4 (Fig. 1d), suggesting that the 34-bp region functions as the BRE in the Id2 gene.
Using the same strategy, we analyzed a BRE within a 5.7-kb 5′ -flanking region of the mouse Id3 gene (Fig. 2). The response of the Id3 gene to BMP-4 was highly dependent on the 35-bp region between positions −3299 and −3265 (5′-ATGACGTCCCACCCTGGCGCCAGGCTGTCTGGGGC-3′), which also contains the GGCGCC sequence (Fig. 2a, b). Similar to the Id1 and Id2 genes, the GGCGCC sequence in the Id3 gene was both necessary and sufficient to mediate the response to BMP-4 (Fig. 2c, d), suggesting that this 35-bp region is the BRE in the Id3 gene.
Smad1 and Smad4 cooperatively induce the transcription of the Id2 and Id3 genes
Next, we analyzed the roles of Smad1 and Smad4 in the transcription of the Id2 and Id3 genes. Using EMSAs, we demonstrated that BMP-4 treatment induced the formation of a DNA–protein complex with both the Id2 and Id3 BREs (Fig. 3a, b). The DNA–protein complexes that formed with the BREs were supershifted upon the addition of antibodies against Smad1 and/or Smad4 (Fig. 3a, b). The DNA–protein complex that formed with the Id1 BRE was competed away by the addition of excess unlabeled DNA of not only the wild-type Id1 BRE but also the wild-type Id2 and Id3 BREs; however, the BREs with mutated GGCGCC sequences failed to compete (Fig. 3c). A ChIP assay demonstrated the binding of endogenous Smad1 and Smad4 to the BREs in the Id2 and Id3 genes in response to BMP-4 (Fig. 3d). The overexpression of Smad1 stimulated the expression of luciferase from both the Id2WT4F-luc reporter and the Id3WT4F-luc reporter (Fig. 3e, f). Co-transfection with Smad4 and Smad1 expression vectors enhanced luciferase expression in C2C12 cells (Fig. 3e, f).
Effects of Rp58 on the transcription of Id1, Id2 and Id3
Recently, Rp58 (Zfp238) was identified as a transcriptional repressor of Id2 and Id3 during myogenesis [18]. We examined the effect of the relationship between the Smads and Rp58 on the transcription of BMP-responsive genes, including Id1, Id2 and Id3, using luciferase reporter constructs driven by each native promoter/enhancer region [Id1(2.1)-luc, Id2(3.1)-luc and Id3(5.7)-luc, respectively]. As reported previously, the overexpression of Rp58 suppressed BMP-4-induced luciferase expression from Id2(3.1)-luc and Id3(5.7)-luc, but Rp58 did not suppress expression from Id1(2.1)-luc (Fig. 4a–c). The consensus sequences for Rp58 were located at positions +174 and +16 of the Id2 and Id3 BREs, respectively, but there was no Rp58 site in proximity to the Id1 BRE (Fig. 4d). An unexpected stimulation, rather than inhibition, of the Id1(2.1)-luc luciferase reporter by Rp58 was also observed with empty pGL4.26 vector (2.0-fold, data not shown).
Identification of a novel BMP-responsive gene containing the conserved BRE
Due to the high level of conservation of the GC-rich BRE sequences among the Id1, Id2 and Id3 genes, we performed a BLAST (http://blast.ncbi.nim.njh.gov/Blast.cgi) search on the mouse genome to identify novel genes that have potential BREs. Using the Id1 BRE as the query sequence, we found a highly conserved sequence (23 of 29 bases identical) on chromosome 13 at position 47,723,740-47,723,768, which showed 79.3, 62 and 45 % homology with the BREs of Id1, Id2 and Id3, respectively (Fig. 5a). We generated a luciferase reporter construct containing four tandem copies of this potential novel BRE upstream of the minimal promoter (Fig. 5b). This reporter was activated in response to BMP-4, and this activation was suppressed by a chemical inhibitor of BMP receptors (Fig. 5b). Using EMSAs and ChIP assays, we demonstrated that this novel BRE was recognized by Smad1 and Smad4 in response to BMP-4 (Fig. 5c, d). Moreover, the overexpression of Smad1 in the presence of Smad4 induced luciferase expression in C2C12 cells (Fig. 5e).
A novel BMP-inducible transcript
Our findings suggest that the novel BRE regulates the transcription of an unidentified gene in response to BMP signaling. However, there were no genes that mapped within 10 kb of the novel BRE in the RefSeq database. We found that the novel BRE was located 255 bp upstream from a single cap analysis gene expression (CAGE) tag in the FANTOM database (TC ID T13F02D835DB; TU ID 83506 forward strand) (Fig. 6a, c). BMP-4 significantly stimulated luciferase expression from a reporter construct containing the genomic sequence from positions −805 to +49 relative to the CAGE tag, a region that includes the novel BRE, and this stimulation was suppressed by the BMP receptor inhibitor LDN-193189 (Fig. 6a). Furthermore, the corresponding endogenous transcript containing the CAGE tag, termed BIT-1, was induced in C2C12 cells within 30 min after treatment with BMP-4 (Fig. 6b). We determined the sequence of full-length BIT-1 from the CAGE tag in C2C12 cells cultured in the presence of BMP-4 using 3′ RACE (Fig. 6c). RT-PCR with a primer set that included the CAGE tag and the 3′ end sequence yielded the expected 1.0-kb single band, which was confirmed by direct DNA sequencing (Fig. 6d). The sequence data for BIT-1 have been deposited in the DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank databases under accession number AB679283. BIT-1 appears to be a non-coding RNA because the first open reading frame from the CAGE tag only encodes 6 amino acids and ATG codons do not correspond to the Kozak consensus sequence (Fig. 6c). Among the mouse tissues, BIT-1 was detected in the testis = brain > cartilage = kidney > and lung, in this order, and this expression pattern was quite different from that of other BMP-responsive genes, such as Id1, Id2 and Id3 (Fig. 6e). Treatment with BMP-4 induced the expression of BIT-1 mRNA and the luciferase reporter not only in C2C12 cells but also in primary osteoblasts (Supplemental Fig. 1). We did not detect any changes in the induction of ALP activity, Id1WT4F-luc expression or the inhibition of myogenesis by BMP signaling with a transient transfection of C2C12 cells with BIT-1 cDNA (data not shown).
Discussion
In the present study, we analyzed the functional BREs in the mouse Id2 and Id3 genes, which are typical early response genes in BMP signaling. Both BREs were found in the 5′-flanking region of each gene; the Id2 BRE was located between positions −2854 and −2820, and the Id3 BRE was located between positions −3299 and −3625. Both mouse BREs were conserved at the corresponding positions in the human Id2 (97 %) and Id3 (100 %) genes (data not shown), suggesting that these regions are important for transcriptional regulation. The BREs in the Id1, Id2 and Id3 genes possess a highly conserved GGCGCC core sequence, and this sequence was recognized by a complex containing Smad1 and Smad4. We previously reported that mutation of the Id1 BRE from GGCGCC to TTTGCC destroys the response to BMP signaling by interrupting the binding of Smads to DNA [7].
Recently, other groups have also identified regions similar to the BREs in the mouse Id2 and human Id3 genes [19, 20]. ChIP-seq analysis using an antibody against Smad1/5 also identified two GC-rich Smad-binding elements in human endothelial cells, the GGCGCC sequence and a GGAGCC sequence [21]. Taken together, all of these findings indicate the importance of the GGCGCC sequence in the BMP response in mammalian cells. Interestingly, although two GGCGCC sequences were identified within a 60-bp region in the mouse Id2 gene, deleting only the region distal to the native promoter/enhancer abrogated the response to BMP-4. These results suggest that the GGCGCC sequence is essential, but not sufficient, for the BMP response. Additional sequences surrounding this core sequence may modify the binding affinity of Smads and/or other co-activators. Although a role for the CAGA (or complement GTCT) box in the BMP response has been suggested, our artificial BRE reporters, Id1WT4F-luc and Id2WT4F-luc, respond to BMP-4 although they lack the CAGA/GTCT box, suggesting that this element may not be essential for the response to BMP signaling. Additional studies are required to clarify the synergism between these sequences in BMP-regulated transcription.
We found a novel BMP-inducible transcript, BIT-1, by searching a genome database using the 29-bp Id1 BRE; the sequence was chosen because not only the core GGCGCC sequence but also the surrounding sequence may be required for the BMP response. The BIT-1 BRE exhibited the highest degree of homology with the Id1 BRE (79.3 %). BIT-1 seems to be one of the BMP-induced non-coding RNAs that include BMP/OP-resposive gene [22]. BIT-1 may have physiological roles in tissue development that are regulated by BMPs, as suggested by the fact that BIT-1 was found to be expressed in the target organs of BMPs, such as the testis, brain, kidney and cartilage. However, transient overexpression of the BIT-1 cDNA in C2C12 cells did not change the typical responses induced by BMPs, including alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, Id-luc expression or myogenesis (data not shown). Cell specificity may be involved in the functions of BIT-1. Gain-of-function and/or loss-of-function analyses in vivo will be required to elucidate the physiological roles of BIT-1. We have searched for novel BREs and BIT-1 in other species. Interestingly, whereas the novel BRE, including the GC-core sequence, is highly conserved not only in mouse but also in human, rat, orangutan, dog, horse and chicken, the conserved BIT-1 sequence is found in mouse and rat, but not in other species. This finding suggests that BIT-1 may function in rodents and that the conserved BRE in other species may regulate the expression of other transcripts in response to BMP signaling.
Recently, Rp58 has been identified as a transcriptional repressor of Id2 and Id3, which are negative regulators of the MyoD family of transcription factors [18]. The expression of Rp58 increased during myogenesis in C2C12 cells [18]. We confirmed the finding that Rp58 suppressed the transcription of the Id2 and Id3 genes via the consensus sites in the 5′-flanking region of each gene. We observed that these Rp58 sites were located close to the BREs in both the Id2 and Id3 genes. The luciferase reporters lacking the Rp58 sites were not suppressed by the overexpression of Rp58, suggesting that Rp58 inhibits the transcription of Id2 and Id3 induced by BMP signaling by binding to the target promoter/enhancer regions. The molecular mechanism of this inhibition will be elucidated by analyzing the components that are recruited to the consensus site by Rp58.
In conclusion, we identified functional BREs in BMP early response genes containing the core GGCGCC sequence. A novel BMP-inducible transcript, BIT-1, may play a role in BMP-regulated tissue development.
References
Attisano L, Wrana JL (2002) Signal transduction by the TGF-beta superfamily. Science 296:1646–1647
Urist MR (1965) Bone: formation by autoinduction. Science 150:893–899
Katagiri T, Yamaguchi A, Komaki M, Abe E, Takahashi N, Ikeda T, Rosen V, Wozney JM, Fujisawa-Sehara A, Suda T (1994) Bone morphogenetic protein-2 converts the differentiation pathway of C2C12 myoblasts into the osteoblast lineage. J Cell Biol 127:1755–1766
Katagiri T, Suda T, Miyazono K (2008) The bone morphogenetic proteins. In: Derynck R, Miyazono K (eds) TGF-β family. Cold Spring Harbor Press, New York, pp 121–149
Wan M, Cao X (2005) BMP signaling in skeletal development. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 328:651–657
Miyazono K, Maeda S, Imamura T (2005) BMP receptor signaling: transcriptional targets, regulation of signals, and signaling cross-talk. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 16:251–263
Katagiri T, Imada M, Yanai T, Suda T, Takahashi N, Kamijo R (2002) Identification of a BMP-responsive element in Id1, the gene for inhibition of myogenesis. Genes Cells 7:949–960
Lopez-Rovira T, Chalaux E, Massague J, Rosa JL, Ventura F (2002) Direct binding of Smad1 and Smad4 to two distinct motifs mediates bone morphogenetic protein-specific transcriptional activation of Id1 gene. J Biol Chem 277:3176–3185
Korchynskyi O, ten Dijke P (2002) Identification and functional characterization of distinct critically important bone morphogenetic protein-specific response elements in the Id1 promoter. J Biol Chem 277:4883–4891
Kim J, Johnson K, Chen HJ, Carroll S, Laughon A (1997) Drosophila Mad binds to DNA and directly mediates activation of vestigial by Decapentaplegic. Nature 388:304–308
Xu X, Yin Z, Hudson JB, Ferguson EL, Frasch M (1998) Smad proteins act in combination with synergistic and antagonistic regulators to target Dpp responses to the Drosophila mesoderm. Genes Dev 12:2354–2370
Ishida W, Hamamoto T, Kusanagi K, Yagi K, Kawabata M, Takehara K, Sampath TK, Kato M, Miyazono K (2000) Smad6 is a Smad1/5-induced smad inhibitor. Characterization of bone morphogenetic protein-responsive element in the mouse Smad6 promoter. J Biol Chem 275:6075–6079
Kusanagi K, Inoue H, Ishidou Y, Mishima HK, Kawabata M, Miyazono K (2000) Characterization of a bone morphogenetic protein-responsive Smad-binding element. Mol Biol Cell 11:555–565
Karaulanov E, Knochel W, Niehrs C (2004) Transcriptional regulation of BMP4 synexpression in transgenic Xenopus. EMBO J 23:844–856
Goldman LA, Cutrone EC, Kotenko SV, Krause CD, Langer JA (1996) Modifications of vectors pEF-BOS, pcDNA1 and pcDNA3 result in improved convenience and expression. Biotechniques 21:1013–1015
Komaki M, Katagiri T, Suda T (1996) Bone morphogenetic protein-2 does not alter the differentiation pathway of committed progenitors of osteoblasts and chondroblasts. Cell Tissue Res 284:9–17
Shin M, Matsuo K, Tada T, Fukushima H, Furuta H, Ozeki S, Kadowaki T, Yamamoto K, Okamoto M, Jimi E (2011) The inhibition of RANKL/RANK signaling by osteoprotegerin suppresses bone invasion by oral squamous cell carcinoma cells. Carcinogenesis 32:1634–1640
Yokoyama S, Ito Y, Ueno-Kudoh H, Shimizu H, Uchibe K, Albini S, Mitsuoka K, Miyaki S, Kiso M, Nagai A, Hikata T, Osada T, Fukuda N, Yamashita S, Harada D, Mezzano V, Kasai M, Puri PL, Hayashizaki Y, Okado H, Hashimoto M, Asahara H (2009) A systems approach reveals that the myogenesis genome network is regulated by the transcriptional repressor RP58. Dev Cell 17:836–848
Nakahiro T, Kurooka H, Mori K, Sano K, Yokota Y (2011) Identification of BMP-responsive elements in the mouse Id2 gene. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 399:416–421
Shepherd TG, Theriault BL, Nachtigal MW (2008) Autocrine BMP4 signalling regulates ID3 proto-oncogene expression in human ovarian cancer cells. Gene 414:95–105
Morikawa M, Koinuma D, Tsutsumi S, Vasilaki E, Kanki Y, Heldin CH, Aburatani H, Miyazono K (2011) ChIP-seq reveals cell type-specific binding patterns of BMP-specific Smads and a novel binding motif. Nucleic Acids Res 39:8712–8727
Takeda K, Ichijo H, Fujii M, Mochida Y, Saitoh M, Nishitoh H, Sampath TK, Miyazono K (1998) Identification of a novel bone morphogenetic protein-responsive gene that may function as a noncoding RNA. J Biol Chem 273:17079–17085
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by Health and Labour Sciences Research Grants for Research on Measures for Intractable Research from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan, grants-in-aid from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan, a grant-in-aid for the Supported Program for the Strategic Research Foundation at Private Universities from the MEXT (S0801004) and a grant-in-aid from the Takeda Science Foundation.
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
Shin, M., Ohte, S., Fukuda, T. et al. Identification of a novel bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-inducible transcript, BMP-inducible transcript-1, by utilizing the conserved BMP-responsive elements in the Id genes. J Bone Miner Metab 31, 34–43 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-012-0381-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-012-0381-1