Abstract
A simple and easy synthesis of ten arylamidoximes from arylnitriles and hydroxylamine is described. The formation of the arylamides has been observed to a much lesser extent in the present work. A new mechanism for the formation of arylamidoximes, as well as arylamides, from arylnitriles and hydroxylamine is suggested. Quantum mechanical calculations have been carried out to support this mechanism. The enthalpy of formation in conjunction with atomic charges of the reactants and intermediates helped to understand more about the generation of the products.
Graphical Abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Amidoximes are an interesting class of compounds. They can serve as starting materials for the synthesis of valuable heterocyclic and other useful compounds [1–7]. Besides their chemical usefulness, this class of compounds possesses pronounced biological activities. Two reviews treating this subject provide the details of such activities [1, 2]. In fact, amidoximes are mainly used as NO generators in vivo, having neuromodulatory and neurotransmittory actions [8]. Another interesting feature concerning amidoximes is that they can be used as prodrugs for amidines, once endogenous cellular reductases reduce amidoximes to amidines [9–11]. Amidoximes are less basic than amidines and are not protonated under physiological conditions, enhancing intestinal absorption by diffusion [12]. In addition, two antithrombotic drugs, sibrafibran and ximelagatran, were developed using this principle of latentiation [13].
For a long time, our group has been involved in synthesizing 1,2,4-oxadiazole derivatives from arylamidoximes [6, 14]. Their synthesis always produced varying quantities of arylamides as well. However, the quantity of amide increases when there is an electron-withdrawing group at the phenyl ring. We therefore decided to investigate the reaction of arylnitriles and hydroxylamine with a view to clarify the mechanism of formation of the principal product as well as to reduce the formation of the undesired amide. Although all amidoximes described in this paper are known, we have developed a simpler procedure for synthesizing arylamidoximes, using hydroxylamine hydrochloride and arylnitriles at room temperature in the presence of sodium bicarbonate. Therefore, we describe herein the synthesis of ten benzamidoximes 6a-6j (Scheme 1) under relatively mild conditions that we have standardized in our laboratory. A more appropriate mechanism of formation of arylamidoximes and arylamides is suggested. In order to support this mechanism, quantum mechanical calculations were performed, which indeed gave some insight about the reaction mechanism.
Results and discussion
Stephenson et al. [15] found that treatment of 4-cyanopyridine or nitriles of the type X-C6H4CN (X = o-NO2, p-CN, p-Cl, or p-CF3) with excess of hydroxylamine in methanol yielded amidoximes (III), but contaminated with varying amounts (17–55%) of the corresponding amides (VI) as shown in Scheme 2. The above authors also proposed the mechanism of amide (VI) formation as given in Scheme 3.
Our suggestion concerning the mechanism is the following: The hard and soft acid base principle (the HSAB principle) [16–18] can be applied in the reaction between arylnitriles and hydroxylamine. Hydroxylamine is an ambident nucleophile, so either the oxygen or nitrogen atom of this molecule may attack the carbon atom of the nitrile, which behaves as a moderately hard acid. Since a strong base would prefer to bind a strong acid, we convincingly feel that the oxygen atom attacks the carbon atom of the nitrile group preferentially and this reaction is kinetically controlled. There are examples where O-acylhydroxylamine derivatives have been isolated as major initial products from the reaction of hydroxylamine with a number of acylating agents at neutral pH [19]. Ambident nucleophilic behavior of hydroxylamine has been demonstrated earlier [20]. Alkyloxylation of α, β-unsaturated esters and nitriles at β-carbon has also been reported [21]. Once the oxygen atom of hydroxylamine attacks the carbon atom of the nitrile, the carbon atom of the intermediate 3 becomes still a harder acid, and now the nitrogen atom of the –O–NH2 moiety can attach to this carbon, forming an oxaziridine ring 4 as an unstable intermediate. Once a three-membered ring is formed, its opening in a normal way should occur through O1–C3 bond cleavage, which will have thermodynamic control. At higher temperature, ring opening may take place either through O1–C3 or N2–C3 bond cleavage, thus providing more amide. Scheme 4 provides a complete picture of the mechanism of formation of the products.
Also, it is important to comment on the mechanism of formation of the amides. Stephenson and colleagues [15] considered the attack of the nitrogen atom of hydroxylamine on the nitrogen atom of (IV) with the formation of (VI) and (VII) (see Scheme 3). Compound (VII) further reacts with a molecule of hydroxylamine to afford a molecule of nitrogen, two molecules of water and a molecule of ammonia. We feel that the initial attack of the hydroxylamine nitrogen at the nitrogen atom of (IV) in a SN2 manner is very difficult because both nitrogen atoms involved in the reaction are electron deficient. Therefore, this kind of reaction is less favorable. Alternatively, the imine part of the nitrogen atom, which has higher electron density, picks up a proton from the –OH of NH2OH and leaves the oxygen atom of hydroxylamine negatively charged, which would easily attack the NH2 group of 7 to provide 8 (Scheme 4).
In Fig. 1 the optimized geometries and the atomic charges for the most important atoms involved in the reaction mechanism are shown. We performed geometry optimization calculations to analyze which of the hydroxylamine atoms (nitrogen or oxygen) would first attack the nitrile carbon. This way, we analyzed a cluster containing one molecule of each reactant, arylnitrile, and hydroxylamine. Only one stable geometry was found, which is shown in Fig. 1a. In this cluster, the binding energy of the molecules is 21.4 kJ mol−1, and they form a hydrogen bond between the hydroxyl group of hydroxylamine and the nitrile nitrogen. It can also be seen that the hydroxylamine oxygen atom (Q O = −0.563) plays a stronger role as a base than the nitrogen atom (Q N = −0.331). This supports our idea that the oxygen atom attacks the nitrile carbon.
In addition to these findings, it can also be noticed that:
-
The atomic charges obtained from quantum mechanical calculations show that the oxygen atom of hydroxylamine has a higher charge compared with the nitrogen atom (see Fig. 1a). This clearly indicates that the electronic charges, as well as electron density, are higher either at the neutral or negatively charged (H2NO−) oxygen atom of hydroxylamine.
-
Since there is a lot of water in the reaction medium, the following equilibrium is also expected:
-
Two molecules of hydroxylamine should give the equilibrium given below:
-
Protonation of the oxygen atom from the second molecule of hydroxylamine should also take place to provide the following:
Once the hydroxylamine oxygen atom attacks the nitrile carbon, the intermediate 3 is formed (see Fig. 1b), and it is 23.4 kJ mol−1 more stable than the reagents cluster (see Fig. 1a). Analyzing the calculated atomic charges at the imine carbon atom (Q C = 0.721) and the hydroxylamine nitrogen atom in intermediate 3 (Q N = −0.654), we can see that there is a strong and attractive electrostatic interaction between the amine nitrogen atom and imine carbon atom. This favors the formation of the oxaziridine ring 4. The optimized geometry for intermediate 4 is shown in Fig. 1c. In this three-membered ring, the calculated atomic charges show a stronger bonding between the carbon (Q C = 0.662) and the nitrogen (Q N = −0.510), rather than between the carbon and the oxygen (Q O = −0.241) atoms. Although the oxaziridine ring is of high energy, this attraction justifies the formation of a three-membered ring. Thus, the C–O bond cleavage should be favored, and intermediate 5 (see Fig. 1d) can be formed. Next, the tautomerization process may occur easily, and product 6 (see Fig. 1e) is generated.
The enthalpy of formation calculations for 3, 4, 5, and 6 were performed in order to analyze their energies (Fig. 2). These energies were calculated as a function of the hydrogen-bonded cluster formed by the reagents (1 and 2). These calculations indicate that 6 is more stable than 3 by 38.1 kJ mol−1. Our calculations also disclose that tautomer 5 is 47.7 kJ mol−1 less stable than 6.
Also, our efforts to calculate the transition state between 8 and 7 did not work out, but the mechanism of amide formation, as depicted in Scheme 4, seems reasonable. Once this happens, the negatively charged oxygen atom of hydroxylamine 8 should attack the nitrogen atom of 7, giving arylamide 9 and an unstable O-aminohydroxylamine 10. This latter product must rearrange to 11, which disproportionates to diimide 12 and water. It is this diimide that is the source of hydrogen and should cause the hydrogenolysis of hydroxylamine to give H2O, N2, and NH3.
In conclusion, we achieved an easy synthesis of ten arylamidoximes under relatively mild conditions. The formation of unwanted arylamides under these conditions is very little. Geometry optimizations and charge densities obtained by quantum mechanical calculations employing the B3LYP/6-311 + G(d) method helped us to propose new mechanisms for the formation of arylamidoximes and arylamides. These calculations also furnished the enthalpy of formation of compounds 3, 4, 5, and 6, which gave more information about the mechanism of formation of the products.
Experimental
Synthesis of arylamidoximes
Hydroxylamine hydrochloride (2.0 g, 29.1 mmol), 2.4 g sodium bicarbonate (29.1 mmol) and 25.0 cm3 water were stirred for about 10 min at room temperature followed by the addition of 3.0 g benzonitrile (29.1 mmol) in 25.0 cm3 ethanol, and the stirring was continued at 25°C for 20 h. More hydroxylamine hydrochloride (1.0 g, 14.5 mmol) was added at room temperature, and the agitation was maintained for an additional 50 h. Filtration and solvent removal left crude amidoxime, which was dissolved in dichloromethane, dried (Na2SO4), filtered, and the solvent removed under reduced pressure. The crude product was recrystallized from chloroform–cyclohexane to give pure benzamidoxime. Other nitriles were transformed to arylamidoximes in a similar manner. Although we generally let the reaction run for 3 days, it is possible to complete the reaction in 20–24 h, except for compounds 6b and 6c, which require 3 days. The yields ranged between 72 and 93% of the pure material, except for 6b, which yielded only 31%. The melting points of arylamidoximes 6a-6e, 6 g, 6 h [14], 6f [22], 6i [23], and 6j [24] agreed with the literature data. We tried to determine the percentage of amide formed in each reaction by 1H NMR spectra of the crude material. In general, the percentage of amide in the crude mixture was ≤5.0%, except in 6b, where it was 8.3%.
Computational methods
Ab initio quantum mechanical calculations were performed to determine geometries, energy and atomic charges for reagents 1 and 2, intermediates 3, 4, and 5, and product 6. The atomic charges were obtained from an electrostatic fit using the CHELPG procedure [25, 26]. All calculations were performed using the Gaussian 03 program [26, 27] and the density-functional method, with the hybrid functional B3LYP [28] and the 6-311 + G(d) basis set. The solvent effects were included in the calculations using the continuum approach with a polarizable continuum model (PCM) [29–31], where all geometries were re-optimized. Atomic charges and enthalpy of formation of the intermediates were also calculated.
References
Eloy F, Lenaers R (1962) Chem Rev 62:155
Nicolaides DN, Varella EA (1992). In: Patai S (ed) The chemistry of acid derivatives. Interscience, New York
Trofimov BA, Schmidt EY, Vasil’tsov AM, Mikhaleva AI, Zaitsev AB, Morozava LV, Gorshkov AG, Henkelmann J, Arndt JD (2001) Synthesis 2427
Miakar B, Stefane B, Kocevar M, Polanc S (1998) Tetrahedron 54:4387
Anbazhagan M, Stephens CE, Boykin DW (2002) Tetrahedron Lett 43:4221 and references cited therein
Srivastava RM, de Almeida Lima A, Viana OS, da Costa Silva MJ, Catanho MTJA, de Morais JOF (2003) Bioorg Med Chem 11:1821
Moustafa AH (2003) Synthesis 837
Jousserandot A, Boucher JL, Henry Y, Niklaus B, Clement B, Mansuy D (1998) Biochemistry 37:17179
Boykin DW, Kumar A, Hall JE, Bender BC, Tidwell RR (1996) Bioorg Med Chem Lett 6:3017
Hall JE, Kerrigan JE, Ramachandran K, Bender BC, Stanko JP, Jones SK, Patrick DA, Tidwell RR (1998) Antimicrob Agents Chemother 42:666
Clement B, Lopian K (2003) Drug Metab Dispos 31:645
Havemeyer A, Bittner F, Wollers S, Mendel R, Kunze T, Clement B (2006) J Biol Chem 281:34796
Ettmayer P, Amidon GL, Clement B, Testa B (2004) J Med Chem 47:2393
Srivastava RM, Brinn IM, Machuca-Herrera JO, Faria HB, Carpenter GB, Andrade D, Venkatesh CG, de Morais LPF (1997) J Mol Struct 406:159
Stephenson L, Warburton WK, Wilson MJ (1969) J Chem Soc (C) 861
Chattaraj PK, Lee H, Parr RG (1991) J Am Chem Soc 113:1855
Méndez F, Gásquez JL (1994) J Am Chem Soc 116:9298
Smith MB, March J (2001) March’s advanced organic chemistry: reactions, mechanism, and structure, 5th edn. Wiley, New York
Jencks WP (1958) J Am Chem Soc 80:4581
Brince CT, Fedor R (1964) J Am Chem Soc 86:738
Zinner G (1959) Angew Chem 71:311
Kaboudin B, Navaee K (2003) Heterocycles 60:2287
dos Anjos JV, Sinou D, de Melo SJ, Srivastava RM (2007) Carbohydr Res 342:2440
Rehse K, Brehme F (1998) Arch Pharm 331:375
Breneman CM, Wiberg KB (1990) J Comput Chem 11:361
Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Gill PMW, Johnson BG, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, Keith T, Petersson GA, Montgomery JA, Raghavachari K, Al-Laham MA, Zakrzewski VG, Ortiz JV, Foresman JB, Cioslowski J, Stefanov BB, Nanayakkara A, Challacombe M, Peng CY, Ayala PY, Chen W, Wong MW, Andres JL, Replogle ES, Gomperts R, Martin RL, Fox DJ, Binkley JS, Defrees DJ, Baker J, Stewart JP, Head-Gordon M, Gonzalez C, Pople JA (1995) Gaussian 94, Revision E.3. Gaussian, Inc, USA
Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, Montgomery JA Jr, Vreven T, Kudin KN, Burant JC, Millam JM, Iyengar SS, Tomasi J, Barone V, Mennucci B, Cossi M, Scalmani G, Rega N, Petersson GA, Nakatsuji H, Hada M, Ehara M, Toyota K, Fukuda R, Hasegawa J, Ishida M, Nakajima T, Honda Y, Kitao O, Nakai H, Klene M, Li X, Knox JE, Hratchian HP, Cross JB, Bakken V, Adamo C, Jaramillo J, Gomperts R, Stratmann RE, Yazyev O, Austin AJ, Cammi R, Pomelli J, Ochterski W, Ayala PY, Morokuma K, Voth GA, Salvador P, Dannenberg JJ, Zakrzewski VGC, Dapprich S, Daniels AD, Strain MC, Farkas O, Malick DK, Rabuck AD, Raghavachari K, Foresman JB, Ortiz JV, Cui Q, Baboul AG, Clifford S, Cioslowski J, Stefanov BB, Liu G, Liashenko A, Piskorz P, Komaromi I, Martin RL, Fox DJ, Keith T, Al-Laham MA, Peng CY, Nanayakkara A, Challacombe M, Gill PMW, Johnson B, Chen W, Wong MW, Gonzalez C, Pople JA (2004) Gaussian 03, Revision D.01. Gaussian, Inc, USA
Becke AD (1993) J Chem Phys 98:5648
Lee C, Yang W, Parr RG (1988) Phys Rev B 37:785
Cossi M, Barone V, Cammi R, Tomasi J (1996) Chem Phys Lett 255:327
Miertus S, Scrocco E, Tomasi J (1981) Chem Phys 55:117
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge the financial assistance of the Brazilian National Research Council (CNPq) to R.M.S, J.V. d. A., and K.C.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Srivastava, R.M., Pereira, M.C., Faustino, W.W.M. et al. Synthesis, mechanism of formation, and molecular orbital calculations of arylamidoximes. Monatsh Chem 140, 1319–1324 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00706-009-0186-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00706-009-0186-7