Summary
The Fifth Generation Mesoscale Model (MM5) is used to study the effect of assimilated satellite and conventional data on the prediction of three monsoon depressions over India using analysis nudging. The satellite data comprised the vertical profiles of temperature and humidity (NOAA-TOVS: – National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration-TIROS Operational Vertical Sounder; MODIS: – MODerate resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) and the surface wind vector over the sea (QuikSCAT: – Quick Scatterometer); the conventional meteorological data included the upper-air and surface data from the India Meteorological Department (IMD). Two sets of numerical experiments are performed for each case: the first set, NOFDDA (no nudging), utilizes NCEP reanalysis (for the initial conditions and lateral boundary conditions) in the simulation, the second set, FDDA, employs the satellite and conventional meteorological data for an improved analysis through analysis nudging. Two additional experiments are performed to study the effect of increased vertical and horizontal resolution as well as convective parameterization for one of the depressions for which special fields observations were available. The results from the simulation are compared with each other and with the analysis and observations. The results show that the predicted sea level pressure (SLP), the lower tropospheric cyclonic circulation, and the precipitation of the FDDA simulation reproduced the large-scale structure of the depression as manifested in the NCEP reanalysis. The simulation of SLP using no assimilation high-resolution runs (HRSKF10KM, HRSKF3.3KM) with the Kain-Fritsch cumulus parameterization scheme appeared poor in comparison with the FDDA run, while the no assimilation high-resolution runs (HRSGR10KM, HRSGR3.3KM) with the Grell cumulus scheme provided better results. However, the space correlation and the root mean square (rms) error of SLP for the HRSKF10KM was better than the FDDA; the largest and smallest space correlation for HRSKF10KM, FDDA, and HRSGR10KM were 0.894 and 0.623, 0.663 and 0.195, and 0.733 and 0.338 respectively; the smallest and largest rms error for HRSKF10KM, FDDA and HRSGR10KM were 1.879 and 5.245, 2.308 and 4.242, and 2.055 and 4.909 respectively. The precipitation simulations with the 3.3 km high-resolution, no assimilation runs performed no better than the precipitation simulation with the FDDA run. Thus, a significant finding of this study is that over the Indian monsoon region, the improvements in the simulation using nudging in the FDDA run are of similar magnitude (or better) than the improvements in the simulation due to high-resolution and to cumulus parameterization sensitivity. The improvements in the FDDA run due to analysis nudging were also verified in two more depression cases. The current operational regional models in India do not incorporate the data assimilation of NOAA-TOVS/MODIS and QuikSCAT satellite data, and hence the results of this study are relevant to operational forecasters in India and their ongoing efforts to improve weather forecasting using satellite data sets.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Alapaty K, Niyogi D, Alapaty M (2001) An inverse technique for assimilating/adjusting soil moisture in the MM5. The 11th Penn State/NCAR MM5 User’s Workshop, NCAR, Boulder, CO
GS Bhat S Ameenulla (2000) ArticleTitleSurface meteorological instrumentation for BOBMEX P Indian A S-Earth 109 221–228
RL Buckley AH Weber JH Weber (2004) ArticleTitleStatistical comparison of regional atmospheric modeling system forecasts with observations Meteorol Appl 11 67–82 Occurrence Handle10.1017/S1350482703001142
R Cox BL Bauer T Smith (1998) ArticleTitleA mesoscale model intercomparison Bull Amer Meteor Soc 79 265–283 Occurrence Handle10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079<0265:AMMI>2.0.CO;2
Das S, Dudhia J, Barker DM, Moncrieff M (2003) Simulation of a heavy rainfall episode over the west coast of India using analysis nudging in MM5. 13th PSU/NCAR Mesoscale Model Users Workshop, NCAR, Boulder, CO
M Das Gupta S Basu RK Paliwal UC Mohanty NV Sam (2003) ArticleTitleAssimilation of special observations taken during the INDOEX and its impact on the global analysis-forecast system Atmosfera 16 103–118
JD Doyle TT Warner (1988) ArticleTitleVerification of mesoscale objective analysis of VAS and rawinsonde data using the March 1982 AVE/VAS Special Network Data Mon Wea Rev 116 358–367 Occurrence Handle10.1175/1520-0493(1988)116<0358:VOMOAO>2.0.CO;2
T Gal-Chen BD Schmidt LW Uccellini (1986) ArticleTitleSimulation experiments for testing the assimilation of geostationary satellite temperature retrievals into a numerical prediction model Mon Wea Rev 114 1213–1230 Occurrence Handle10.1175/1520-0493(1986)114<1213:SEFTTA>2.0.CO;2
Grell GA, Dudhia J, Stauffer DR (1994) A description of the fifth generation Penn State/NCAR mesoscale model (MM5). NCAR Technical Note TN-398+STR National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO
YH Kuo YR Guo (1989) ArticleTitleDynamic initialization using observations from a hypothetical network of profiles Mon Wea Rev 117 1975–1998 Occurrence Handle10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117<1975:DIUOFA>2.0.CO;2
AE Lipton TH Vonder Haar (1990) ArticleTitleMesoscale analysis by numerical modeling coupled with sounding retrieval from satellites Mon Wea Rev 118 1308–1329 Occurrence Handle10.1175/1520-0493(1990)118<1308:MABNMC>2.0.CO;2
AE Lipton GD Modica ST Heckman AJ Jackson (1995) ArticleTitleSatellite model coupled analysis of convective potential in Florida with VAS water vapor and surface temperature data Mon Wea Rev 123 3292–3304 Occurrence Handle10.1175/1520-0493(1995)123<3292:SMCAOC>2.0.CO;2
CF Mass D Ovens K Westrick BA Colle (2002) ArticleTitleDoes increasing horizontal resolution produce more skillful forecasts? Bull Amer Met Soc 83 407–430 Occurrence Handle10.1175/1520-0477(2002)083<0407:DIHRPM>2.3.CO;2
P Mukhopadhyay J Sanjay WR Cotton SS Singh (2004) ArticleTitleImpact of surface meteorological observations on RAMS forecast of monsoon weather systems over the Indian region Meteorol Atmos Phys 90 77–108 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00703-004-0090-y
G Nageswara Rao (2001) ArticleTitleOccurrence of heavy rainfall around the confluence line in monsoon disturbances and its importance in causing floods P Indian A S-Earth 110 87–94
Nielson-Gammon J (2004) Performance evaluation of profiler nudging in the MM5 meteorological model. Report to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, 26 pp. http://216.239.59.104/search?q-cache:iKuJQdrn01AJ:www.met.tamu.edu/temp/profnudg2.pdf
Pielke RASR (2002) Mesoscale meteorological modeling. Elsevier Publications, Academic Press, 676 p
KVJ Potty UC Mohanty S Raman (2000) ArticleTitleNumerical simulation of monsoon depression over India with a high resolution nested regional model Meteor Appl 7 45–60 Occurrence Handle10.1017/S1350482700001432
D Rajan AK Mitra SRH Rizvi RK Paliwal AK Bohra VB Bhatia (2001) ArticleTitleImpact of satellite derived moisture in a global numerical weather prediction model Atmosfera 14 203–209
D Rajan B Simon PC Joshi VB Bhatia AK Mitra RK Paliwal (2002) ArticleTitleImpact of NOAA/TOVS derived moisture profile over the ocean on global data assimilation and medium range weather forecasting Atmosfera 15 223–236
SK Roy Bhowmik (2003) ArticleTitlePrediction of monsoon rainfall with a nested grid mesoscale limited area model P Indian A S-Earth 112 499–519
SK Roy Bhowmik K Prasad (2001) ArticleTitleSome characteristics of limited area model precipitation forecast of Indian monsoon and evaluation of associated flow features Meteorol Atmos Phys 76 223–236 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s007030170031
FH Ruggiero KD Sashegyi AE Lipton RV Madala S Raman (1999) ArticleTitleCoupled assimilation of geostationary satellite sounder data into a mesoscale model using the Bratseth analysis approach Mon Wea Rev 127 802–820 Occurrence Handle10.1175/1520-0493(1999)127<0802:CAOGSS>2.0.CO;2
S Sandeep A Chandrasekar D Singh (2006) ArticleTitleThe Impact of AMSU data for the prediction of a tropical cyclone over India using a mesoscale model Int J Rem Sens 27 4621–4653 Occurrence Handle10.1080/01431160600857410
DR Sikka P Sanjeeva Rao (2000) ArticleTitleBay of Bengal Monsoon Experiment (BOBMEX) – a component of the Indian Climate Research Programme (ICRP) P Indian A S-Earth 109 207–209
R Singh PK Pal (2003) ArticleTitleImpact of QuikSCAT derived wind fields on a mesoscale non-hydrostatic model Mausam 54 183–188
DR Stauffer NL Seaman (1990) ArticleTitleUse of four-dimensional data assimilation in a limited-area mesoscale model. Part I: Experiments with synoptic-scale data Mon Wea Rev 118 1250–1277 Occurrence Handle10.1175/1520-0493(1990)118<1250:UOFDDA>2.0.CO;2
SS Vaidya P Mukhopadhyay DK Trivedi J Sanjay SS Singh (2003) ArticleTitlePrediction of tropical systems over Indian region using a mesoscale model Meteorol Atmos Phys 86 63–72 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00703-003-0019-x
J Venkata Ratnam EA Cox (2006) ArticleTitleSimulation of monsoon depression using MM5: sensitivity to cumulus parameterization schemes Meteorol Atmos Phys 93 53–58 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00703-005-0160-9
VF Xavier A Chandrasekar R Singh B Simon (2006) ArticleTitleThe impact of assimilation of MODIS data for the prediction of a tropical low pressure system over India using a mesoscale model Int J Rem Sens 27 4655–4676 Occurrence Handle10.1080/01431160500207302
DL Zhang XX Wang (2003) ArticleTitleDependence of hurricane intensity and structure on vertical resolution and time-size Adv Atmos Sci 20 711–725 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02915397
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Correspondence: Anatharaman Chandrasekar, Department of Physics and Meteorology, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur 721302, India
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xavier, V., Chandrasekar, A., Rahman, H. et al. The effect of satellite and conventional meteorological data assimilation on the mesoscale modeling of monsoon depressions over India. Meteorol Atmos Phys 101, 65–92 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-008-0314-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-008-0314-7