Introduction

Sepsis is characterized by a systemic inflammatory response to an insult (Vandijck et al. 2006) and is considered one of the most frequent causes of morbidity and mortality in intensive care units (ICU) (Sands et al. 1997). There are approximately 750,000 cases per year with 10–50% of deaths in North America (Angus et al. 2001) and around 400,000 new cases each year in Brazil (Marshall et al. 2005).

An essential feature of sepsis is the rapid production of cytokines, chemokines, prostaglandins and nitric oxide (Chao et al. 1995; Rietschel et al. 1996; Hu et al. 1997). At a macroscopic level, the systemic inflammatory response of sepsis causes significant hematological, hemodynamical and constitutional instability. At a microscopic level, there is impairment in the relationship between oxygen delivery and consumption, mainly related to defects in microcirculatory perfusion and disturbances in cellular metabolic pathways (Nelson et al. 1988; Cain and Curtis 1991). These changes, together with disruption of the brain blood barrier (BBB), may result in oxidative stress (Barichello et al. 2006; Comim et al. 2011), impairment of energetic metabolism (Comim et al. 2008, 2011) and apoptosis (Messaris et al. 2004; Semmler et al. 2005; Kafa et al. 2010) in the central nervous system (CNS), associated with depressive-like parameters (Comim et al. 2010) and cognitive damage (Barichello et al. 2005; Tuon et al. 2008). Thus, brain dysfunction caused by sepsis is known as septic encephalopathy (SE) and has been reported to occur in 8–70% of septic patients, depending on the inclusion criteria employed, and may be a poor outcome predictor (Sprung et al. 1990; Young et al. 1990).

Erythropoietin (EPO) is a 31-kDa glycoprotein that stimulates the proliferation, differentiation and survival of erythroid progenitor cells through an antiapoptotic mechanism (Jelkmann 1992). Recent studies have shown that, in addition to its hematological activity, EPO has cytoprotective effects on various cells and tissues. Although EPO is mainly produced by the fetal liver and adult kidneys, its receptors are also expressed in the brain, heart, lung, liver, kidneys, vascular endothelium and lymphoid tissues, and are even more pronounced in situations of hypoxia (Digicaylioglu et al. 1995; Westenfelder et al. 1999; Farrell and Lee 2004). Studies showed that the administration of exogenous EPO in animal models attenuated cerebral ischemia, spinal cord injury (Maiese et al. 2004), acute renal failure (Sharples and Yaqoob 2006) and myocardial ischemia (Abdelrahman et al. 2004). Paradoxically, it may induce lung injury by ischemia–reperfusion (Wu et al. 2006). In addition to its innumerous mechanisms of action, EPO has shown inhibitory effects on the activity of nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) (Squadrito et al. 1999; Akimoto et al. 1999), which produces large amounts of nitric oxide (NO), an important cause of hypotension, hypoperfusion and cell damage during sepsis (Chandra et al. 2006). Nitric oxide has direct deleterious effect on cells and becomes potentially pro-inflammatory and cytotoxic when it reacts with the hydroxyl radical (O2 ) to form peroxynitrite (ONOO), a powerful free radical (Chandra et al. 2006).

Considering that there is a lack of information in the literature regarding the use of EPO in sepsis, even more in SE, the present study proposed to evaluate the effects of EPO on oxidative stress and energetic metabolism in the brain as well as cognitive deficits in septic rats submitted to sepsis by cecal ligation and perforation (CLP).

Materials and methods

Animals

Male Wistar rats (3–4 months old, 220–310 g) were obtained from our breeding colony (UNESC). The animals were housed five to a cage with food and water available ad libitum and maintained on a 12-h light/dark cycle (lights on at 7:00 a.m.). All experimental procedures involving animals were performed in accordance with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and the Brazilian Society for Neuroscience and Behavior (SBNeC) recommendations for animal care. All protocols performed were approved by the ethics committee at UNESC (protocol number 88/2011).

Experimental procedures

Under general anesthesia (ketamine at 80 mg kg−1 and xylazine at 10 mg kg−1), 24 and 15 male Wistar rats underwent CLP (sepsis group, single 14-G perforation) and sham operation (control group), respectively, as previously described. After surgery, the sepsis group received basic support (saline at 50 mL kg−1 immediately and 12 h after CLP plus ceftriaxone at 30 mg kg−1 and clindamycin at 25 mg kg−1 every 6 h for a total of 3 days). The sham-operated group received only saline at 50 mL kg−1, immediately and 12 h after surgery (volume of saline corresponded to antibiotic volume administered). The animals were divided into five groups: acute treatment: sham = 10 animals; CLP 6 h = 5 animals; CLP 24 h = 5 animals; chronic treatment: sham 10 days = 10 animals and CLP 10 days = 10 animals. All animals presented signs of encephalopathy 6 h after sepsis (lethargy, mild ataxia, lack of spontaneous movement and loss of righting reflex) and gradually returned to their normal awakened status 24–36 h after CLP. To minimize the possibility that the animals did not truly develop sepsis, the CLP procedure was performed by the same investigators at all times. In addition, all animals were observed after CLP to determine signs of infection (piloerection, lethargy, tachypnea and weight loss), and the number of animals that survived was in accordance with our previous reports (Barichello et al. 2005, 2006; Tuon et al. 2008; Comim et al. 2008, 2010, 2011).

Regarding the acute treatment, the animals received either a single systemic injection of EPO at 1,200 UI kg−1 administered subcutaneously, or saline solution immediately after the induction. The animals were killed after 6 h (oxidative stress evaluation) (Barichello et al. 2006) and 24 h (energetic metabolism evaluation) (Comim et al. 2008) of sepsis induction and had the hippocampus removed and immediately stored at −80°C for posterior analyses. With regard to chronic treatment, the animals received four doses (immediately, and 24, 48 and 72 h after surgery) of EPO at 300 UI kg−1—the final dose was the same as for acute treatment. The animals were then submitted to the step-down inhibitory avoidance task 10 days after surgery. Mortality was also evaluated during chronic treatment.

Behavior test

The step-down inhibitory avoidance test evaluates aversive memory. Briefly, the training apparatus was a 50 × 25 × 25-cm acrylic box (Albarsch, Porto Alegre, Brazil) with a floor consisting of parallel caliber stainless steel bars (1-mm diameter) spaced 1-cm apart. A 7-cm wide, 2.5-cm high platform was placed on the floor of the box against the left wall. During the training trial, the animals were placed on the platform and their latency to step down on the grid with all four paws was measured with an automatic device. Immediately after stepping down on the grid, the animals received a 0.4-mA, 2.0-s foot shock and were returned to their home cage. A retention test trial was performed 24 h after training. The retention test trial was procedurally identical to training, except that no foot shock was performed. The retention test step-down latency (maximum, 180 s) was used as a measure of inhibitory avoidance retention (Quevedo et al. 1999).

Biochemical analyses

Mitochondrial respiratory chain enzyme activities

Brain structures were homogenized (1:10, w/v) in SETH buffer (250 mM sucrose, 2 mM EDTA, 10 mM Trizma base, 50 IU mL−1 heparin, pH 7.4) for determination of mitochondrial respiratory chain enzyme activities (complexes I, II, II–III and IV). NADH dehydrogenase (complex I) was evaluated according to the method described by Cassina and Radi (1996) by the rate of NADH-dependent ferricyanide reduction at 420 nm (Cassina and Radi 1996). The activities of succinate–DCIP oxidoreductase (complex II) and succinate–cytochrome c oxidoreductase (complex II–III) were determined according to the method of Fischer et al. (1985). Complex II activity was measured by following the decrease in absorbance due to the reduction of 2,6-DCIP at 600 nm. Complex II–III activity was measured by cytochrome c reduction from succinate. The activity of cytochrome c oxidase (complex IV) was assayed by following the decrease in absorbance due to the oxidation of previously reduced cytochrome c at 550 nm (Miro et al. 1998). The activities of the mitochondrial respiratory chain complexes were expressed as nmol/min mg protein (Miro et al. 1998).

Creatine kinase activity

Creatine kinase (CK) activity was measured in brain homogenates pre-treated with 0.625 mM lauryl maltoside. The reaction mixture consisted of 60 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5, containing 7 mM phosphocreatine, 9 mM MgSO4 and approximately 0.4–1.2 lg protein in a final volume of 100 lL. After 15 min of pre-incubation at 37°C, the reaction was started by the addition of 0.3 lmol of ADP plus 0.08 lmol of reduced glutathione. The reaction was stopped after 10 min by the addition of 1 lmol of p-hydroxymercuribenzoic acid. The creatine formed was estimated according to the colorimetric method of Hughes (1962). The color was developed by the addition of 100 lL 2% α-naphthol and 100 lL 0.05% diacetyl in a final volume of 1 mL and read spectrophotometrically after 20 min at 540 nm. Results were expressed as U/min mg protein.

Citrate synthase activity

The method of citrate synthase (CS) activity has been described by Srere (1969). The reaction mix contained 100 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 0.1 mM acetyl-CoA, 0.1 mM 5,5′-ditiobis-(2 nitrobenzoic acid), 0.1% Triton X-100, 2–4 μg supernatant protein and initial oxaloacetate of 0.2 mM that was monitored with 412 nm for 3 min at 25°C.

Oxidative stress

In order to assess oxidative damage, the formation of thiobarbituric acid reactive species (TBARS) was measured during an acid-heating reaction, as previously described (Esterbauer and Cheeseman 1990). The samples were mixed with 1 mL of 10% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) and 1 mL of 0.67% thiobarbituric acid and were then heated in a boiling water bath for 15 min. Thiobarbituric acid reactive species was determined by the absorbance at 535 nm. Oxidative damage to proteins was measured by the quantification of carbonyl groups based on the reaction with dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH), as previously described (Levine et al. 1994). Proteins were precipitated by the addition of 20% TCA and redissolved in DNPH; the absorbance was read at 370 nm. To determine catalase (CAT) activity, the brain tissue was sonicated in 50 mmol/L phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), and the resulting suspension was centrifuged at 3,000g for 10 min. The supernatant was used for enzyme assay. Catalase activity was measured by the rate of decrease in hydrogen peroxide absorbance at 240 nm (Aebi 1984). Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity was assayed by measuring the inhibition of adrenaline auto-oxidation, as previously described (Bannister and Calabrese 1987). All biochemical measures were normalized to the protein content, with bovine albumin as standard (Lowry et al. 1951).

Statistical analysis

Data from biochemical analyses are presented as mean ± SD. Data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple comparisons were performed by Tukey test. Data from inhibitory avoidance are presented as the median (interquartile range) of retention test latencies. Differences between training and test session latencies within each group were determined using the Wilcoxon test. Comparisons among groups were performed using Mann–Whitney U test. Mortality was assessed by Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and log rank test. Values of p < 0.05 were considered to be significant.

Results

The mortality rates are shown in Fig. 1. There were statistical differences in the mortality rates between CLP and sham groups 24 h after induction. The use of EPO prevented mortality during the first 4 days after CLP (time of treatment). Then, mortality rates were higher when compared with sham group and similar to the CLP group.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The effects of EPO on mortality rates. Bars represent percentages of mortality after Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and log rank test

Figure 2 shows the oxidative and antioxidant activity in the hippocampus after acute treatment with EPO (6 h after surgery). We observed that there was an increase in lipid peroxidation in the CLP group when compared with the sham group. A decrease in TBARS levels was observed after acute treatment with EPO when compared with the sham and CLP groups (a). Regarding protein peroxidation, no differences between groups were observed (b). Regarding antioxidant activity, there was an increase in both CAT (c) and SOD (d) activities in the CLP group when compared with the sham group. Such increases were attenuated by acute treatment with EPO when compared with the CLP group.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The effects of acute treatment with EPO on oxidative and antioxidant activity in the hippocampus after 6 h of induction. Bars represent means and SD of five rats. *p < 0.05 versus sham group and **p < 0.05 versus CLP group after one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey test

Figure 3 demonstrates the effect of the acute treatment of EPO on energetic metabolism (24 h after surgery) in the hippocampus. No statistical differences were observed between groups regarding Complex I (a), Complex II (b), Complex III (c) and Complex IV (d). We believe that the significance was not possible in Fig. 1a due to the high standard deviation. The CK activity was decreased in comparison with the sham; the acute treatment with EPO also decreased CK activity when compared with the CLP and sham groups (e). Finally, there were no alterations in the CS activity between groups (f).

Fig. 3
figure 3

The effects of acute treatment with EPO on energetic metabolism in the hippocampus after 24 h of induction. Bars represent means and SD of five rats. *p < 0.05 versus sham group and **p < 0.05 versus CLP group after one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey test

The results of the behavior test are shown in Fig. 4. The aversive memory was evaluated 10 days after surgery. Sepsis induction by CLP caused cognitive damage in the aversive memory; the chronic treatment with EPO was able to reverse the cognitive impairment observed in the CLP group.

Fig. 4
figure 4

The effects of chronic treatment with EPO in the cognitive damage in the hippocampus after 10 days of induction. Bars represent means and median (interquartile ranges) of ten rats. *p < 0.05 versus training after Wilcoxon test and Mann–Whitney U test

Discussion

In this study, we observed that (1) the acute treatment with EPO (a single dose) did not attenuate oxidative stress or the energetic metabolism 6 and 24 h, respectively, after induction by CLP; (2) the chronic treatment (four doses) reversed the cognitive damage 10 days after sepsis induction by CLP; and (3) the use of EPO prevented mortality only in the first 4 days (during the EPO treatment) after induction.

Erythropoietin has been used in the treatment of certain types of anemia inhibiting apoptosis of erythrocyte progenitor cells and increasing formation of new red blood cells. Recently, EPO has also been recognized as a multifunctional cytokine with anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidative, and anti-apoptotic properties (Sharples et al. 2004; Ates et al. 2005; Cuzzocrea et al. 2006). Additionally, some reports have demonstrated the beneficial effects of EPO in animal models of acute inflammation (Cuzzocrea et al. 2006; Mitra et al. 2007; Aoshiba et al. 2009). The protective effects have been extensively investigated in animal models of ischemia–reperfusion injury as well. In these models, EPO effectively attenuated acute renal dysfunction by anti-apoptotic, anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative mechanisms (Vesey et al. 2004; Sharples et al. 2004; Ates et al. 2005; Cuzzocrea et al. 2006). However, the issue of EPO transport across the BBB in vivo is complicated by the fact that endothelial cells synthesize a soluble EPO receptor (which is readily detected in humans) that would sequester EPO, neutralizing its biological activity (Yamaji et al. 1996; Harris and Winkelmann 1996).

In this regard, a great number of studies failed to demonstrate the beneficial effects of treatment using EPO. In a recent study, it was observed that acute treatment with EPO did not attenuate renal dysfunction or inflammation in a porcine model of endotoxemia (Sølling et al. 2011a). This same group showed in this study that the protective effect of EPO was against ischemia–reperfusion injury, but not against endotoxemia. In a randomized, double-masked, single-center trial study with preterm infants in Switzerland, it was observed that there were no significant effects of early high-dose EPO treatment in preterm infants on blood pressure, cerebral oxygenation, hemoglobin, leukocyte and platelet count (Fauchère et al. 2008). A previous report using pigs showed that the endotoxemia increased the number of apoptotic cell in the blood and the spleen, and EPO did not modify this alteration (Sølling et al. 2011b). This study does not support that EPO confers protection against lymphocyte apoptosis. The lymphocyte apoptosis may be crucial to the development of sepsis-induced immunosuppression. In vivo, microdialysis of hippocampal neurons reveals that NO production is elevated after EPO (Yamamoto et al. 2004). International guidelines do not recommend the use of EPO as a specific treatment for anemia associated with severe sepsis, although no specific information regarding its use in septic shock patients is currently available (Dellinger et al. 2008). The fact is that there are not many data in the literature regarding the benefits of the use of EPO in the septic brain, and there is still no consensus on the benefits of its use in many diseases.

The brain is particularly sensitive to oxidative damage due to its relative high content of peroxidizable fatty acids and limited antioxidant capacity (Floyd 1999). In our study, the use of EPO decreased the TBARS levels and also the levels of CAT and SOD. Similarly, Calapai et al. (2000) have demonstrated in a brain ischemic injury that EPO causes a decrease in malondialdehyde (MDA) levels during brain ischemia. Malondialdehyde is the end product of major reactions leading to significant oxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids in cellular membranes and thus serves as a reliable marker of oxidative stress. The major intracellular antioxidant enzyme, SOD, rapidly and specifically reduces superoxide radicals (O2−) to hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). As the level of oxidative stress progresses, the level of SOD activity decreases (Floyd 1999). The decomposition of H2O2 to form water and oxygen is accomplished in the cell by CAT. One reason for the increase in MDA is the H2O2 in the medium (Floyd 1999). Both CAT and SOD enzymes break down the H2O2 formed in the tissues. However, the activities of these enzymes were increased by sepsis and decreased by EPO in our study. Therefore, we suggest that EPO may be acting by preventing oxidative damage before 6 h and, as oxidative stress progresses, the levels of SOD and CAT activity decrease.

With regard to mortality rates after treatment with EPO, this study observed that the administration of EPO prevented mortality only during chronic treatment—the first 4 days after surgery. Recent studies have raised important issues about the safety of EPO administration: (1) the treatment with EPO resulted in increased mortality in patients with acute stroke (Ehrenreich et al. 2009); (2) recent meta-analyses demonstrated that correcting anemia with EPO in patients with cancer may worsen survival (Tonelli et al. 2009; Bohlius et al. 2009); and (3) EPO increases the risk of thrombosis; so, caution should be taken when used in patients who are already at an increased risk of thrombosis, such as in critically ill patients.

Cognitive deficits are one of the alterations described in both humans (Iwashyna et al. 2010) and rats (Barichello et al. 2005a, b; Tuon et al. 2008) that survive sepsis. In this study, we showed that the use of EPO (divided into four doses) reversed the cognitive damage 10 days after induction. Although sufficient studies have not been done to assess a possible role for EPO in learning and memory, some authors have shown that the administration of EPO in healthy mice markedly increases conditioned taste aversion (Ehrenreich et al. 2004). We believe that EPO had effect on cognition by different pathways, because EPO did not increase CK activity and decreased the antioxidant activity in the hippocampus. Apparently, the beneficial effect observed with EPO administration was with regard to the level of lipid peroxidation and cognitive damage. The neurobiology of cognitive impairment in sepsis is still not entirely clear, but a number of studies have shown that oxidative stress may be involved in this complex process (for review see: Streck et al. 2008; Comim et al. 2009). We believe that the effects of EPO on learning and memory are likely to be an especially new area for future investigation, since no clear mechanism can be elucidated at this point.

In conclusion, this study observed that the acute use of EPO (a single dose) did not attenuate oxidative stress or energetic metabolism, but the chronic use (4 days) reversed the cognitive impairment in sepsis animal model. Also, mortality rate was decreased only during the first 4 days after induction (chronic treatment). Thus, further investigations are necessary to assess the effects of EPO treatment on CNS, memory, and learning to provide a solid mechanistic explanation for the beneficial effect of EPO in the animal model of sepsis.