Abstract
Synaptic loss, particularly related to the forebrain cholinergic system, is considered to be an early event that leads to Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and has led to the development of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChE-Is) as the mainstay of treatment for several degenerative disorders that culminate in dementia. The primary dose-limiting toxicities of all clinically available AChE-Is are, similar to useful actions on cognition, cholinergically mediated and they ultimately limit the value of this drug class in achieving anything but symptomatic improvements. In addition, AChE levels in brain areas associated with AD decline with disease progression, which likely ultimately limits the therapeutic utility of this drug class. New research indicates that selective inhibition of butyrylcholinesterase (BuChE), a closely related enzyme that is markedly elevated in AD brain, increases acetylcholine (ACh) and augments cognition in rodents free of the characteristic undesirable actions of AChE-Is. BuChE inhibition hence represents an innovative treatment approach for AD, and agents are currently being synthesized to optimally achieve this. The novel compound, tetrahydrofurobenzofuran cymserine (THFBFC), is derived from our effort to produce a potent and BuChE-selective inhibitor as a candidate to test the hypothesis that BuChE-Is would be efficacious and better tolerated than AChE-Is in AD. Herein, we applied innovative enzyme kinetic analyses to characterize the quantitative interaction of THFBFC with human BuChE. These provided values for the agent’s IC50, together with specific new kinetic constants, such as K T50, K T1/2, R I, o K RT, o P max, K PT and PT1/2, to aid define target concentrations for clinical translation. Additional classical kinetic parameters, including K i, K m or K s, k cat or V max and V mi were also determined. THFBFC proved to be a potent competitive inhibitor of human BuChE and, like its isomer dihydrobenzodioxepine cymserine, is a potentially interesting AD drug candidate.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Alzheimer’s disease (AD), a progressive degenerative disorder that is the most common cause of dementia in the elderly, is typified by an increasing impairment of memory that is associated with behavioural problems (Cummings 2004; Farlow and Cummings 2007). These psychiatric disturbances largely arise from dysfunction and death of neurons in critical brain regions important in cognition and mood, including the basal forebrain, hippocampus and frontal, parietal and entorhinal cortex. From a neuropathological standpoint, AD is epitomize by the presence of amyloid plaques that primarily comprise of amyloid-β peptide (Aβ), neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) and a loss of both synaptic processes and presynaptic markers of the cholinergic system in the noted brain areas (Sambamurti et al. 2002; Selkoe 2005). Most AD is sporadic in aetiology, evolving from unknown causes, with age and apolipoprotein E status predominating incidence (Sambamurti et al. 2002, 2006; Hardy 2006). A far smaller fraction of AD, particularly early onset, is familial AD (FAD). Mutations in one of several genes, exemplified by presenilins (PS1, PS2) and amyloid-β precursor protein (APP), result in FAD (Sisodia and St George-Hyslop 2002; Selkoe 2005). A shared result of many of these mutations is that they raise Aβ, particularly the hydrophobic Aβ42 (Sambamurti et al. 2002; Selkoe 2005), aggregates of which target synapses and impair memory (Lacor 2004; Lesne et al. 2006).
Up to now, acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChE-Is) represent the principal strategy to treat mild to moderate AD, to which the NMDA antagonist, memantine, is occasionally added (Cummings 2004; Farlow and Cummings 2007). Approaches are, however, being developed to lower Aβ, by lowering its production through inhibition of the secretase activities (β and γ) that cleave it from APP and by increasing its clearance, as well as to reduce tau phosphorylation, oxidative stress and neuroinflammation (Lahiri et al. 2004; Doraiswamy and Xiong 2006). Recent studies suggest that current clinically available AChE-Is (donepezil, rivastigmine and galantamine), which primarily act by reducing the rate of hydrolysis of ACh in brain to amplify its cholinergic activity, may secondarily impact these targets (Standridge 2004; Small 2005). Although this may, indeed, be true in cell culture and animal models, whether or not this is achieved clinically remains unknown (Small 2005). They, regrettably, appear to have little impact on the underlying pathological process that leads to AD to offset disease progression. Their symptomatic actions are generally modest and recent clinical trials have triggered debate as to the true benefit of this drug class (Courtney 2004; Lopez 2005). Current AChE-Is are dose-limited by their own primary actions that result in the common cholinergically-mediated adverse effects of nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea and dizziness (Farlow and Cummings 2007), which likely occur prior to initiating any potentially favourable secondary activities. Recent research indicates, however, that centrally mediated inhibition of a homologous cholinesterase (ChE) form, butyrylcholinesterase (BuChE), may achieve the cognitive improvements associated with current AChE-Is without the classic dose-limiting actions (Greig et al. 2005c).
Butyrylcholinesterase efficiently catalyses the hydrolysis of numerous endogenous substances, including choline esters (Silver 1974; Soreq and Zakut 1993; Darvesh et al. 2003; Giacobini 2003) and, although predominantly associated with glial cells in human brain, it is additionally expressed in neuronal somata and their proximal dendrites in brain areas affected by AD, such as in amygdala, hippocampus and thalamus (Darvesh et al. 1998, 2003; Darvesh and Hopkins 2003). The survival and ‘normality’ of the brain of AChE knockout (AChE−/−) versus normal (AChE+/+) mice, together with the distinct and overlapping distribution patterns of AChE- and BuChE-positive neurons, supports the opinion that BuChE is involved in neural function (Mesulam et al. 2002; Rice et al. 2007), for example co-regulation of cholinergic and non-cholinergic neurotransmission (Greig et al. 2002; Giacobini 2003; Darvesh et al. 2003). This viewpoint is fortified by animal studies indicating that selective BuChE-Is, cymserine analogues, elevate brain levels of ACh in AChE+/+ and −/− animals, augment LTP in brain slice preparations and improve cognitive performance of aged rodents without adverse actions (Greig et al. 2005c; Hartmann et al. 2007). As a secondary action, these same compounds reduced Aβ levels in the brain of transgenic mice expressing mutant human APP and PS1 (Greig et al. 2005c).
Whether or not these actions would translate to humans and, in particular to AD, remains to be determined. To assess this, our studies have focused on the design and development of novel ‘drug-like’ compounds based on the pharmacophore of the classic short-acting anticholinesterase, (−)-physostigmine, from which we originally derived long-acting (−)-cymserine and its BuChE selective analogues (Greig et al. 1995, 2005b; Yu et al. 1999) (Fig. 1). Our previous efforts culminated in the synthesis of the novel compound, tetrahydrofurobenzofuran cymserine (THFBFC) (Luo et al. 2005a, b, 2006), which was loosely based on the backbone of the short-acting anticholinesterase, (−)-physovenine (Fig. 1), a congener of (−)-physostigmine that similarly is a natural alkaloid deriving from the Calabar bean, Physostigma venenosum (Greig et al. 1995). Herein, we characterized the mode and kinetic binding constants of THFBFC through innovative enzyme interaction analyses to assess its suitability as a drug candidate to elucidate the therapeutic potential of BuChE inhibition in AD, as well as to define target concentrations in humans to aid clinical translation.
Materials and methods
Materials
Butyrylthiocholine iodide (BuSCh, was used as a substrate), 5,5′-dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB as a colouring reagent), and 1,5-bis(4-allyldimethyl-ammoniumphenyl) pentan-3one dibromide (BW284C51) were obtained from Sigma (St Louis, MO, USA) while human serum BuChE was obtained from a local blood bank (unit no 8599114; ARCBS Sydney ORhD positive). THFBFC was synthesized as reported earlier (Luo et al. 2005b), and was prepared as a racemate [(±)-THFBC] (Fig. 1).
Assay of BuChE activity
Quantification of BuChE activity was assessed by the Ellman technique (1961). The assay mixture contained BuSCh, 0.25 mM DTNB, 0.05 mM BW284C51 (a classic selective, potent and irreversible inhibitor of AChE) and 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.2. The rate of substrate hydrolysis by BuChE was determined by measuring the absorbance of the reaction-product at 405 nm λ. Concentrations of substrate and THFBFC were determined from preliminary studies to insure optimal correlations.
Vmax and Vmi determinations
Apparent maximal activity (V max) and V mi represent two different subtypes of maximum activity. The former is based on calculation of the apparent maximum activity of BuChE at a particular concentration of THFBFC along with varied concentrations of the substrate. The latter expresses the apparent maximum activity at a particular concentration of BuSCh along with varied concentrations of THFBFC.
Protein estimation
Total protein concentration of human serum was estimated by Bradford method (Bradford 1976) using Coomassie G-250 Dye. An optical density of reaction product was measured at 595 nm λ.
Graphics
Graphs were plotted using GOSA (Bio-Log, Toulouse, France) and Prism (version 4, GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA) software and values of the correlation coefficients and specific kinetic constants were obtained by the regression analysis (linear and several different non-linear forms) computed within these packages.
Results
The reflective binding activity index of THFBFC for human serum BuChE at 0.6 mM BuSCh (substrate) concentration (Fig. 2a) demonstrated the interaction of THFBFC with the passing of reaction time (RT). The time required to achieve half V max (K T1/2) increased smoothly over all tested concentrations of THFBFC, while the pseudo maximum product (P max) remained largely unaltered by the same conditions (Fig. 2b). New kinetic constants (NKCs) defining the interaction of the inhibitor and enzyme are presented in Table 1, and are derived from secondary replots of the primary main plot of Fig. 2a. Figure 2c illustrates the relationship between the percentage activity of BuChE versus the THFBFC concentration to allow calculation of an IC50 value (the concentration required to inhibit 50% of enzymatic activity). Its secondary plot expresses the relationship of IC50 versus reaction time in this study (Fig. 2d). Determined from the analysis depicted in this figure, the IC50 value of THFBFC for BuChE was calculated as 25.0 ± 2.2 nM.
The inhibition style of human serum BuChE by THFBFC at dual concentration of BuSCh before (Fig. 3a) and after completion of the reaction (Fig. 3b) demonstrates recovery of inhibition over passing time. Figure 4 allows characterization of the physiological nature of the binding of THFBFC to enzyme. Specific NKCs of physiological relevance, o K RT (the overall rate of inhibition constant) and o P max (the overall maximum product concentration), were determined at dual substrate concentrations (0.05 and 0.40 mM BuSCh), at various preincubation (0–60 min) and reaction times (6–180 min; Fig. 4a, b). The values of o K RT were determined as 27 and 46 min, and o P max as 14 ± 0.2 and 110 ± 1.2 at 0.05 and 0.40 mM BuSCh, respectively (inset of Fig. 4a, b). The plot (Fig. 4c) for activity of BuChE versus preincubation time (PT) demonstrates a slow binding pattern of the affect of THFBFC over BuChE along with range of preincubation times, and allowed the determination of two further new constants: (1) K PT (the preincubation time constant) with a value of 0.079 and 0.097, and (2) the PT1/2 (preincubation time required for half ν) with a value of 8.78 and 7.14 min, for 0.05 and 0.40 mM BuSCh, respectively (Fig. 4c). A plot of percent activity and percent inhibition of BuChE by THFBFC versus preincubation time is shown in Fig. 4d.
The classical kinetic parameters of K i (inhibition constant), K s (substrate constant), K m (Michaelis–Menten constant), k cat (catalytic constant), V max (apparent maximal activity) and V mi (V maxi apparent) were, additionally, evaluated (Figs. 5, 6). The values of these were determined from appropriate equations related to different potential types of inhibition by use of GOSA, and are shown in Table 2. The difference between the general equation and competitive inhibition model is not statistically significant but the latter model is superior (with a higher number of degrees of freedom), so this analysis depicts a competitive inhibition system for BuChE inhibition by THFBFC. Overall, this kinetic study of BuChE inhibition by THFBFC is illustrated in Scheme 1. Secondary replots of the primary plot of Dixon (Fig. 6a) and the Lineweaver–Burk plot (Fig. 6b) of BuChE inhibition by THFBFC were constructed to differentiate between the most plausible modes of inhibitions.
Discussion
An increasing body of evidence supports a role for BuChE as a co-regulator of the brain cholinergic system. The recent development of AChE−/− mice that readily survive with normal levels and localization of BuChE (Mesulam et al. 2002) and no neuronal, dendritic, astrocytic, synaptic, microglial or endothelial differences (Rice et al. 2007), together with the development of entirely selective BuChE-Is, such as (−)-N1-phenethylcymserine (PEC) (Yu et al. 1999), that elevate brain ACh levels in normal and AChE−/− mice (Greig et al. 2005c; Hartmann et al. 2007), indicates that brain BuChE has a physiological function. The relevance of this can be assessed from recent studies by Cerbai et al. (2007), where donepezil (AChE selective), rivastigmine (AChE/BuChE unselective) and PEC (BuChE selective) were administered systemically to normal healthy rats to achieve similar twofold to threefold elevations in brain extracellular ACh levels, as determined by in vivo microdialysis and HPLC. To achieve this, donepezil induced a 27% AChE inhibition, rivastigmine a 40% AChE and 25% BuChE inhibition and PEC a 39% BuChE inhibition in the brain of rats, in which total ChE levels comprise >90% AChE and <10% BuChE (Cerbai et al. 2007). By corollary, the super-sensitivity of BuChE−/− mice to selective AChE-Is, at concentrations that are well tolerated in BuChE+/+ animals (Duysen et al. 2007), reiterates the physiological relevance of BuChE in neurotransmission.
Within the human nervous system AChE, likewise, predominates over BuChE (Giacobini 2003; Darvesh et al. 2003). In the temporal cortex of normal human brain, for example AChE accounts for some 90% of ChE activity, with BuChE accounting for the remainder (Perry et al. 1978). However, whereas AChE is localized mainly to neurons, BuChE is associated primarily with glial cells as well as neurons and, in specific brain areas, nuclei of BuChE-rich neurons and neural tracts that utilize BuChE alone appear to exist (Darvesh and Hopkins 2003; Darvesh et al. 2003). The normal relationship between AChE and BuChE changes during disease. In AD, AChE activity can routinely decline by some 45% in specific brain areas during disease progression, accompanying the archetypal loss of presynaptic ACh. By contrast, BuChE activity concurrently is elevated by up to twofold (Perry 1986; Arendt et al. 1984, 1992), likely consequent to the increased number of glial cells found in AD brain, and some of this co-localizes with the hallmark cortical and neocortical amyloid-rich neuritic plaques and NFTs (Guillozet et al. 1997). A disparity, thereby, develops between reduced ACh synthesis/availability and one of its main hydrolysing enzymes—an elevated BuChE.
Selective BuChE inhibition, that appears to be unassociated with classic AChE-I adverse actions in animal models (Greig et al. 2005c), may therefore be useful in ameliorating a cholinergic deficit, which likely worsens in AD due to increased activity of BuChE (Greig et al. 2002; Giacobini 2003; Darvesh et al. 2003). Our recent synthesis of novel carbamate ChEIs, such as on the skeletons of tetrahydrofurobenzofurans and dihydromethanobenzodioxepines, was undertaken to test this hypothesis (Luo et al. 2005a, b, 2006). The assessment of the apparent binding activity index of THFBFC for human serum BuChE at 0.6 mM BuSCh concentration provides a measure of enzyme–inhibitor interaction in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 2). The foundation of the Ellman assay (Ellman et al. 1961) that underlies our study is that units of active BuChE with an open active site are able to bind with substrate, BuSCh, to catalyse it into butyrate and thiocholine. Released thiocholine then reacts with DTNB to generate a colored reaction-product in a concentration- and time-dependent manner. The time required to achieve half V max (K T1/2) was increased smoothly by increasing the concentration of THFBFC, while the pseudo maximum product (P max) remained unaltered (Fig. 2b). By contrast, in our previous study of the isomer, dihydrobenzodioxepine cymserine (Fig. 1), K T1/2 and P max were both increased dramatically around 20 nM (Kamal et al. 2007), which indicates a different enzyme binding interaction pattern of these two closely related compounds. The major difference in the values of K T50 and P PC, reflected in Table 1, also supports this conclusion.
For our initial description of the synthesis of novel anticholinesterases based on tetrahydrofurobenzofuran (Luo et al. 2005a), we performed a preliminary enzyme kinetic analysis by characterizing the inhibitor–enzyme interaction at half-log inhibitor concentrations increments between 0.3 nM and 10 μM utilizing a single substrate concentration (0.5 mM) and reaction time (30 min). This permitted calculation of simple comparative IC50 values of human BuChE by the synthesized compounds. THFBFC, compound 12 with an IC50 of 27 ± 4 nM (Luo et al. 2005a), was chosen for further study, herein, due to a combination of its potency for BuChE versus AChE (IC50 2,650 ± 400 nM) and selectivity (∼100-fold), together with the knowledge that cymserine analogues are long acting (Greig et al. 1995, 2005c). Our more in depth analysis over a concentration range (6–50 nM) that precisely skirts the original IC50 estimate provides a slightly lower value (Fig. 2c). In addition, a non-significant relationship between IC50 versus reaction time (Fig. 2d) predicts a complex nature of reversible inhibition of BuChE by THFBFC, as compared to a significant relationship found in our prior analysis of inhibition of BuChE by the isomer, dihydrobenzodioxepine cymserine (Kamal et al. 2007). Clearly, whereas these two isomers have closely related structures (Fig. 2) and both bind within and potently inhibit BuChE, the three-dimensional change of their conformity in their tricyclic rings (Luo et al. 2005a, 2006) provides them slightly different enzyme binding kinetic characteristics.
Assessment of the inhibition of human BuChE by THFBFC at dual concentrations of BuSCh (0.05 and 0.40 mM) before (Fig. 3a) and after completion of reaction (Fig. 3b) demonstrates initial slow binding of the inhibitor in the absence of the substrate, comparable to a pseudo-irreversible type of inhibition. With the addition of and corresponding competition of BuSCh, THFBFC interaction with BuChE appears to be more of a reversible nature with the passage of reaction time, and is clearer in Fig. 3b. Analysis of the data presented in Fig. 4 allowed calculation of new binding constants for human BuChE inhibition, focused to aid clinical translation and that may prove of wide applicability. These can be compared to other closely related cymserine analogues that we have recently studied as AD drug candidates.
Specifically, the K iapp and a predicted K i values for the selective BuChE-I, (−)-bisnorcymserine, have recently been reported as 0.7 and 0.131 nM, respectively (Kamal et al. 2006b), which compares favourably with those of our initial BuChE-I, (−)-cymserine, with values of 115 and 38 nM, respectively (Kamal et al. 2006a). By contrast, the calculated K i value of dihydrobenzodioxepine cymserine was reported as 2.22 nM, according to a competitive inhibition equation, or 3.24 and 7.91 nM for K i1 and K i2, respectively, in line with a partial mixed type of competitive inhibition equation (Kamal et al. 2007). Then again, the estimated K i value for THFBFC, studied herein, is 3.91 nM according to the competitive inhibition equation, or 5.28 and 40 nM for K i1 and K i2, respectively, in line with the partial competitive as well as mixed type of inhibition equation (Table 2). The interaction of THFBFC with BuChE can be understood through Scheme 1. In either case, the closely related isomers, THFBFC and dihydrobenzodioxepine cymserine, synthesized to block potential metabolic interactions with the indole moieties of the tricyclic backbone of cymserine analogues, are less potent than (−)-bisnorcymserine but more than (−)-cymserine. All the same, it is likely that the estimated K i values for THFBFC and dihydrobenzodioxepine cymserine fall within a clinically achievable range, as plasma levels of the close analogues, (−)-phenserine and (+)-phenserine (Fig. 1), reached 5.79 nM and in excess of 300 nM at a well tolerated doses of 10 and 80 mg in humans, respectively (Greig et al. 2005a, b).
To more fully characterize the nature of inhibition by THFBFC, secondary slope replots were generated of the primary plot of Dixon in Fig. 6a. This bears close resemblance to a traditional plot for competitive inhibition in which the replot line goes approximately through the origin (0.055 and −0.0006 X- and Y-axes, respectively). To further identify the potential mode of action, secondary replots [slope, reciprocal K mapp (1/K ma) and V maxapp (1/V max) of the primary Lineweaver–Burk plot of BuChE inhibition by THFBFC] were undertaken (Fig. 6b) to differentiate between competitive inhibition and a mixed type of inhibition. The parameter, 1/V max, should significantly increase in the latter case; however, it was found to be close to flat (slope value: 0.001), again reflecting that inhibition was more of a competitive type in the current study. However, the described slight divergence regarding the 1/V mi plot (slope value: −0.022 ± 0.0011; Fig. 6a) suggests the potential of a minor mixed component. Hence, as illustrated in Scheme 1, the portion that belongs to a mixed type of competitive inhibition is, accordingly, shaded.
In summary, THFBFC, similar to dihydrobenzodioxepine cymserine (Kamal et al. 2007), represents an interesting and potent BuChE-I that possesses IC50 and K i values, together with associated kinetic parameters, that are likely attainable in AD subjects. Of note, the replacement of both indole nitrogen groups (the N1 and N8 groups shown in Fig. 1) in the tricyclic backbone common to (−)-physostigmine and the AD experimental AD drugs, (−)-phenserine, (+)-phenserine (Lahiri et al. 2007) and (−)-bisnorcymserine, by oxygen moieties provides drug-like, potent BuChE-Is that are competitive rather than non-competitive oriented types of inhibitors (Kamal et al. 2006a, b, 2007). For THFBFC, this additionally results in a potentially interesting slow onset of inhibition (Fig. 3), as the rapid elevation of brain ACh levels has been suggested to underpin the centrally mediated nausea common to AChE-Is. Up to now, a selective BuChE-I has yet to reach the clinic. Hence, whether or not their potential translates to AD and related dementias to impact symptoms and/or disease progression remains to be determined. Insight may derive from BuChE mutations in humans, that are not uncommon (Souza et al. 2005), and several result in a loss of BuChE activity (akin to a steady-state level of inhibition). The BuChE-K variant (Ala539Thr) is present in some 33% of Caucasian and Asian individuals, and those possessing two alleles for BuChE-K (homozygous) show an approximate 30% reduced BuChE activity (Bartels et al. 1992; Ballard et al. 2005). In an increasing number of studies where AD subjects were genotyped for BuChE genetic variants and their disease progression measured (O’Brien et al. 2003; Holmes et al. 2005; Ballard et al. 2005; Déniz-Naranjo et al. 2007), those with BuChE deficiency had a delayed onset of AD and a slower cognitive decline compared to patients with wild-type BuChE levels. The choice of which cymserine analogue to finally translate to clinical assessment will ultimately depend on the cost of bulk synthesis and tolerability in cellular and animal models.
Abbreviations
- ACh:
-
Acetylcholine
- AChE:
-
Acetylcholinesterase
- AChE-Is:
-
Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors
- AD:
-
Alzheimer’s disease
- APP:
-
Amyloid-β precursor protein
- Aβ:
-
Amyloid-β peptide
- BuChE:
-
Butyrylcholinesterase
- BuSCh:
-
Butyrylthiocholine iodide
- BuChE-Is:
-
Butyrylcholinesterase inhibitors
- ChEs:
-
Cholinesterases
- ChE-Is:
-
Cholinesterase inhibitors
- CNS:
-
Central nervous system
- FAD:
-
Familial Alzheimer’s disease
- THFBFC:
-
Tetrahydrofurobenzofuran cymserine
- K PT :
-
Preincubation time constant
- K T50 :
-
Concentration of inhibitor doubles K T1/2
- o K RT :
-
Overall rate of inhibition constant
- P PC :
-
Concentration of inhibitor doubles pseudo P max
- o P max :
-
Overall maximum product concentration
- K T1/2 :
-
Time required for half V max;
- PT1/2 :
-
Preincubation time required for half ν;
- R I :
-
Rate of IC50
- RβA:
-
Reflective binding activity
- K i :
-
Inhibition constant
- K s :
-
Substrate constant
- K m :
-
Michaelis-Menten constant
- k cat :
-
Catalytic constant
- V max :
-
Apparent maximal activity
- V mi :
-
V maxi
References
Arendt T, Bigl V, Walther F, Sonntag M (1984) Decreased ratio of CSF acetylcholinesterase to butyrylcholinesterase activity in Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet 1:173
Arendt T, Bruckner MK, Lange M, Bigl V (1992) Changes in acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase in Alzheimer’s disease resemble embryonic development—a study of molecular forms. Neurochem Int 21:381–396
Ballard CG, Greig NH, Guillozet-Bongaarts AL, Enz A, Darvesh S (2005) Cholinesterases: roles in the brain during health and disease. Curr Alzheimer Res 2:307–318
Bartels CF, Jensen FS, Lockridge O (1992) DNA mutation associated with the human butyrylcholinesterase K-variant and its linkage to the atypical variant mutation and other polymorphic sites. Am J Hum Genet 50:1086–1103
Bradford M (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254
Cerbai F, Giovannini MG, Melani C, Enz A, Pepeu G (2007) N1phenethyl-norcymserine, a selective butyrylcholinesterase inhibitor, increases acetylcholine release in rat cerebral cortex: a comparison with donepezil and rivastigmine. Eur J Pharmacol 572:142–150
Courtney C (2004) AD2000 collaborative group. Long-term donepezil treatment in 565 patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD2000): randomised double-blind trial. Lancet 363(9427):2105–2115
Cummings JL (2004) Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med 351:56–67
Darvesh S, Hopkins DA (2003) Differential distribution of butyrylcholinesterase and acetylcholinesterase in the human thalamus. J Comp Neurol 463:25–43
Darvesh S, Grantham DL, Hopkins DA (1998) Butyrylcholinesterase in normal human amygdala and hippocampal formation. J Comp Neurol 393:374–390
Darvesh S, Hopkins DA, Geula C (2003) Neurobiology of butyrylcholinesterase. Nat Rev Neurosci 4:131–138
Déniz-Naranjo MC, Muñoz-Fernández C, Alemany-Rodríguez MJ, Pérez-Vieitez Mdel C, Aladro-Benito Y, Irurita-Latasa J, Sánchez-García F (2007) Butyrylcholinesterase, ApoE and Alzheimer’s disease in a population from the Canary Islands (Spain). Neurosci Lett 427:34–38
Doraiswamy PM, Xiong GL (2006) Pharmacological strategies for the prevention of Alzheimer’s disease. Expert Opin Pharmacother 7:1–10
Duysen EG, Li B, Darvesh S, Lockridge O (2007) Sensitivity of butyrylcholinesterase knockout mice to (−)-huperzine A and donepezil suggests humans with butyrylcholinesterase deficiency may not tolerate these Alzheimer’s disease drugs and indicates butyrylcholinesterase function in neurotransmission. Toxicology 233:60–69
Ellman GL, Courtney KD, Andres V Jr, Featherstone RM (1961) A new and rapid colorimetric determination of acetylcholinesterase activity. Biochem Pharmacol 7:88–95
Farlow MR, Cummings JL (2007) Effective pharmacologic management of Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Med 120:388–97
Giacobini E (2003) Butyrlcholinesterase: its function and inhibitors. Martin Dunitz, London and New York
Greig NH, Pei X-F, Soncrant T, Ingram DK, Brossi A (1995) Phenserine and ring-C hetero-analogues: drug candidates for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Med Chem Rev 15:3–31
Greig NH, Lahiri DK, Sambamurti K (2002) Butyrylcholinesterase: an important new target in Alzheimer’s disease therapy. Int Psychogeriatr 14:77–91
Greig NH, Ruckle J, Comer P, Brownell L, Holloway HK, Flanagan DR Jr, Canfield CJ, Burford RG (2005a) Anticholinesterase and pharmacokinetic profile of phenserine in healthy elderly human subjects. Curr Alzheimer Res 2:483–492
Greig NH, Sambamurti K, Yu Q-S, Brossi A, Bruinsma G, Lahiri DK (2005b) An overview of phenserine tartrate, a novel acetylcholinesterase inhibitor for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Alzheimer Res 2:281–291
Greig NH, Utsuki T, Ingram DK, Wang Y, Pepeu G, Scali C, Yu QS, Mamczarz J, Holloway HW, Giordano T, Chen D, Furukawa K Sambamurti K, Brossi A, Lahiri DK (2005c) Selective butyrylcholinesterase inhibition elevates brain acetylcholine, augments learning and lowers Alzheimer β-amyloid peptide in rodent. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:17213–17218
Guillozet AL, Smiley JF, Mash DC, Mesulam M (1997) Butyrylcholinesterase in the life cycle of amyloid plaques. Ann Neurol 42:909–18
Hardy J (2006) Has the amyloid cascade hypothesis for Alzheimer’s disease been proved? Curr Alzheimer Res 3:71–73
Hartmann J, Kiewert C, Duysen EG, Lockridge O, Greig NH, Klein J (2007) Excessive levels of hippocampal acetylcholine in acetylcholinesterase-knockout mice are moderated by butyrylcholinesterase activity. J Neurochem 100:1421–1428
Holmes C, Ballard CG, Lehmann D, David Smith A, Beaumont H, Day IN, Nadeem Khan M, Lovestone S, McCulley M, Morris CM, Munzo DG, Russ C, Del Ser T, Warden D (2005) Rate of progression of cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease: effect of butyrylcholinesterase K gene variation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 76:640–643
Kamal MA, Al-Jafari AA, Yu Q-S, Greig NH (2006a) Kinetic analysis of the inhibition of human butyrylcholinesterase with cymserine. Biochim Biophys Acta 1760:200–206
Kamal MA, Yu Q-S, Holloway HW, Tweedie D, Klein P, Greig NH (2006b) Kinetics of human serum butyrylcholinesterase and its inhibition by a novel experimental Alzheimer therapeutic, bisnorcymserine. J Alzheimers Dis 10:43–51
Kamal MA, Klein P, Yu Q-S, Holloway HW, Tweedie D, Greig NH (2007) Kinetics of human serum butyrylcholinesterase inhibition by a novel experimental Alzheimer therapeutic, dihydrobenzodioxepine cymserine. Neurochem Res. doi:10.1007/s11064-007-9490-y
Lacor PN (2004) Synaptic targeting by Alzheimer’s-related amyloid beta oligomers. J Neurosci 24:10191–10200
Lahiri DK, Rogers JT, Greig NH, Sambamurti K (2004) Rationale for the development of cholinesterase inhibitors as anti-Alzheimer agents. Curr Pharm Des 10:3111–3119
Lahiri DK, Chen D, Maloney B, Holloway HW, Yu QS, Utsuki T, Giordano T, Sambamurti K, Greig NH (2007) The experimental Alzheimer’s disease drug posiphen [(+)-phenserine] lowers amyloid-beta peptide levels in cell culture and mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 320:386–396
Lesne S, Koh MT, Kotilinek L, Kayed R, Glabe CG, Yang A, Gallagher M, Ashe KH (2006) A specific amyloid-beta protein assembly in the brain impairs memory. Nature 440:352–357
Lopez OL (2005) Alteration of a clinically meaningful outcome in the natural history of Alzheimer’s disease by cholinesterase inhibition. J Am Geriatr Soc 53:83–87
Luo W, Yu QS, Holloway HW, Greig NH, Brossi A (2005a) Syntheses of tetrahydrofurobenzofurans and dihydro-methanobenzodioxepines from 5-hydroxy-3-methyl-3H-benzofuran-2-one. Re-arrangement and ring expansion under reductive conditions on treatment with hydrides. J Org Chem 70:6171–6176
Luo X, Yu QS, Zhan M, Parrish D, Deschamps JR, Kulkarni SS, Holloway HW, Alley GM, Lahiri DK, Brossi A, Greig NH (2005b) Novel anticholinesterases based on the molecular skeletons of furobenzofuran and benzodioxepine. J Med Chem 48:986–994
Luo W, Yu QS, Kulkarni SS, Holloway HW, Parrish D, Tweedie D, Lahiri DK, Brossi A, Greig NH (2006) (−) And (+)-o-carbamoyl phenols of pyrroloindole, furoindole, furobenzofuran and benzodioxepine: enantiomeric syntheses and structure/activity relationship for human acetyl- and butyrylcholinesterase inhibitory action. J Med Chem 49:2174–2185
Mesulam M-M, Guillozet A, Shaw P, Levey A, Duysen EG, Lockridge O (2002) Acetylcholinesterase knockouts establish central cholinergic pathways and can use butyrylcholinesterase to hydrolyze acetylcholine. Neuroscience 110:627–639
O’Brien KK, Saxby BK, Ballard CG, Grace J, Harrington F, Ford GA, O’Brien GT, Swan AG, Fairbairn AF, Wesnes W, Del Ser T, Edwardson JA, Morris CM, McKeith IG (2003) Regulation of attention and response to therapy in dementia by butyrylcholinesterase. Pharmacogenetics 13:231–239
Perry EK (1986) The cholinergic hypothesis—ten years on. Br Med Bull 42:63–69
Perry EK, Perry RH, Blessed G, Tomlinson BE (1978) Changes in brain cholinesterase in senile dementia of Alzheimer’s type. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 4:273–277
Rice SG, Nowak L, Duysen EG, Lockridge O, Lahiri DK, Reyes PF (2007) Neuropathological and immunochemical studies of brain parenchyma in acetylcholinesterase knockout mice: implications in Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis 11:481–489
Sambamurti K, Greig NH, Lahiri DK (2002) Advances in the cellular and molecular biology of the beta-amyloid protein in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuromolecular Med 1:1–31
Sambamurti K, Anitha S, Venugopal C, Prakasam A, Zhou Y, Lahiri DK, Greig NH (2006) A partial failure of membrane protein turnover may cause Alzheimer’s disease: a new hypothesis. Curr Alzheimer Res 3:81–90
Selkoe DJ (2005) Defining molecular targets to prevent Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol 62:192–195
Silver A (1974) The biology of cholinesterases. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Sisodia SS, St George-Hyslop PH (2002) gGamma-secretase, notch, Abeta and Alzheimer’s disease: where do the presenilins fit in? Nat Rev Neurosci 3:281–290
Small DH (2005) Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors for the treatment of dementia in Alzheimer’s disease: do we need new inhibitors? Expert Opin Emerg Drugs 10:817–825
Soreq H, Zakut H (1993) Human cholinesterases and anticholinesterases. Academic, New York
Souza RL, Mikami LR, Maegawa RO, Chautard-Freire-Maia EI (2005) Four new mutations in the BCHE gene of human butyrylcholinesterase in a Brazilian blood donor sample. Mol Genet Metab 84:349–353
Standridge JB (2004) Pharmacotherapeutic approaches to the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Clin Ther 26:615–630
Yu QS, Holloway HW, Utsuki T, Brossi A, Greig NH (1999) Phenserine-based synthesis of novel selective inhibitors of butyrylcholinesterase for Alzheimer’s disease. J Med Chem 42:1855–1861
Acknowledgments
This research was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kamal, M.A., Qu, X., Yu, Qs. et al. Tetrahydrofurobenzofuran cymserine, a potent butyrylcholinesterase inhibitor and experimental Alzheimer drug candidate, enzyme kinetic analysis. J Neural Transm 115, 889–898 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-008-0022-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-008-0022-y