Abstract
Background
Chronic subdural haematomas (cSDHs) have shown an increasing incidence in an ageing population over the last 20 years, while unacceptable recurrence rates of up to 30 % persist. The recurrence rate of cSDH seems to be related to the excessive neoangiogenesis in the parietal membrane, which is mediated via vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). This is found to be elevated in the haematoma fluid and is dependent on eicosanoid/prostaglandin and thromboxane synthesis via cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2). With this investigator-initiated trial (IIT) it was thought to diminish the recurrence rate of operated-on cSDHs by administering a selective COX-2 inhibitor (Celecoxib) over 4 weeks’ time postoperatively in comparison to a control group.
Method
The thesis of risk reduction of cSDH recurrence in COX-2-inhibited patients was to be determined in a prospective, randomised, two-armed, open phase-II/III study with inclusion of 180 patients over a 2-year time period in four German university hospitals. The treated- and untreated-patient data were to be analysed by Fisher’s exact test (significance level of alpha, 0.05 [two-sided]).
Results
After screening of 246 patients from January 2009 to April 2010, the study had to be terminated prematurely as only 23 patients (9.3 %) could be enrolled because of on-going non-steroid anti-rheumatic (NSAR) drug treatment or contraindication to Celecoxib medication. In the study population, 13 patients were treated in the control group (six women, seven men; average age 66.8 years; one adverse event (AE)/serious adverse event (SAE) needing one re-operation because of progressive cSDH (7.7 %); ten patients were treated in the treatment group (one woman, nine men; average age 64.7 years; five AEs/SAEs needing two re-operations because of one progressive cSDH and one wound infection [20 %]). Significance levels are obsolete because of insufficient patient numbers.
Conclusions
The theoretical advantage of COX-2 inhibition in the recurrent cSDH could not be transferred into the treatment of German cSDH patients as 66.6 % of the patients showed strict contraindications for Celecoxib. Furthermore, 55 % of the patients were already treated with some kind of COX-2 inhibition and, nevertheless, developed cSDH. Thus, although conceptually appealing, an anti-angiogenic therapy with COX-2 inhibitors for cSDH could not be realised in this patient population due to the high prevalence of comorbidities excluding the administration of COX2 inhibitors.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Chronic subdural haematoma (cSDH) is a challenging neurosurgical disease that gains more and more importance, especially in an ageing and extensive medically treated population (dialysis, anticoagulation, antiplatelet medication) [25, 26, 29]. In general, symptomatic or large cSDHs have to be treated surgically [11] as spontaneous resorption is rare. Despite optimised surgical procedure a recurrence rate of up to 20–30 % is stated [27]. With the COXIBRAIN study we aimed at clarifying the influence of selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibition on the recurrence rate of cSDH in postoperative patients.
Study background
The incidence of cSDH varies between 2 and 13 in 100,000 individuals and rises with the average age of the population. Three-quarters of the patients are older than 50 years; the peak of incidence is at 65 years of age, with 60 % men and 40 % women patients. In the lifespan of 80–89 years of age, the incidence is even fourfold higher [1, 5, 15]. The recurrence rate is stated to be up to 20–30 %, with a mortality which is estimated to be between 1 and 13 % [21, 27, 32]. Thus, cSDH exhibits an important role in morbidity and mortality of the elderly.
In order to diminish the recurrence rate, various operative procedures were devised; an extended burr-hole trephination with drainage and irrigation, as well as the use of a Jackson-Pratt drainage is the actual preferred surgical procedure [14, 32, 33]. However, so far the pathogenesis of the subdural haematoma (SDH) and its recurrence has not been fully understood.
Inflammatory processes, osmotic gradients and a local disturbance of the haemostasis are discussed to play an important role in the development and recurrence of the SDH [7, 22, 34, 35]. The neomembranes of the SDH can be distinguished into a visceral and a highly vascularised, parietal membrane. Very thin-walled and fragile vessels can be found with numerous morphological anomalies like missing basal membranes and pericytes, cytoplasmatic protrusions and endothelial fenestrations with gap junctions of more than 8 μm in diameter. These anomalies are responsible for a higher fragility and permeability of the newly formed vessels, which probably leads to a continuous progression of the cSDH [8, 17, 18, 22, 34]. A higher concentration of growth factors, especially vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) can be found in the haematoma fluid in comparison to the blood serum [24, 28, 31]. VEGF is secreted by macrophages and endothelial cells in the parietal membrane [24, 30]. The excessive production of VEGF results in a precipitous neovascularisation with an increased permeability of the newly developed vessels. This might probably cause at least a persistence or even an enlargement of the SDH.
That led to the hypothesis that an inhibition of the secretion of proangiogenic mediators might be beneficial in the treatment of SDH patients [12]. The synthesis of VEGF and other proangiogenic growth factors is dependent on the COX-2-mediated eicosanoids, like prostaglandins and thromboxanes. The inhibition of the COX-2 shows anti-angiogenic and antiproliferative effects in vitro and in vivo [13, 16]. Based on this, we set out to prospectively study whether selective COX-2 inhibition might reduce the recurrence rate of cSDH.
Study design
The aim of this prospective randomised, two-arm, open, phase-II/III clinical trial in parallel group design was to verify the hypothesis of reduction of recurrence rate in cSDH by selective COX-2 inhibition for 28 days post surgical treatment. The approval of the relevant ethics committee in each study centre was obtained prior to the start of the study; each patient had to give written informed consent before being enrolled into the study.
After stratification according to gender, age and pre-existing anticoagulation, patients were block-randomised in the two study treatment arms. Four study centres (university hospitals of Berlin, Mannheim, München and Greifswald) were initiated to treat 180 patients within 2 years (Fisher’s exact test, power 80 % and significance level of alpha = 0.05, including a drop-out rate of 10 %).
Exclusion criteria were determined according to the contraindications of Celecoxib (Table 1). The primary target was the recurrence rate of the cSDH within 8 weeks post surgical treatment. Secondary targets comprised the time to recurrence, number of revision operations and the toxicity of treatment. One inclusion and four follow-up visits were planned postoperatively within 48 h up to the 56th postoperative day (Fig. 1).
Study execution
After the standardised surgical procedure (burr-hole trephination, haematoma drainage with a Jackson-Pratt drainage) the treatment group (B) was given 200 mg Celebrex twice daily for the first 3 postoperative days. The Celebrex dose was reduced then to 200 mg Celebrex daily for another 25 days, then discontinuation of the medication. The control group (A) did not receive any study medication and were abstained from further selective or unselective COX inhibition. The patients were followed-up for 8 weeks to evaluate the recurrence rate, the medication’s side effects and the quality of life (EORTC SF 36). Because of special patient security measurements in the selective COX-2 inhibition the medication’s side effects were monitored using the CTCAE version 3.0 in the five study visits. The results were prospectively monitored with the use of the Bayesian toxicity assessment and discussed in the external Data Safety Monitoring Board.
Patient characteristics
Twenty-three patients were enrolled before the trial was discontinued because of an insufficient study inclusion rate. Out of 23 patients, 13 were randomly assigned to the control group (A) and 10 patients to the treatment group (B). The control group (A) consisted of seven men (53.8 %) and six women (46.2 %) patients with the mean age of 71 years, whereas treatment group (B) consisted of nine men (90 %) and one woman patient (10 %) with the mean age of 65 years. The overall the study population consisted of 16 men (69.5 %) and seven women (30.5 %) patients with the mean age of 68 years.
Study discontinuation
The COXIBRAIN study was initiated on 1 January 2009 and closed prematurely on 28 April 2010 because of insufficient patient inclusion rates. Two hundred and forty-six (178 male [72 %] and 68 [28 %]) female patients were screened but only 23 were suitable to be enrolled into the study mainly because of contraindications to selective COX-2 inhibition (163 patients [67 %]) or pre-existing therapy with antiplatelet medication (pre-existing COX inhibition in 135 patients [55 %]). Forty patients refused to participate in this study. This added up to a patient inclusion rate of just 9.4 % to the trial.
Nearly two-thirds of the screened patients (163 patients) showed a contraindication for treatment with Celebrex (e.g. cardiopulmonary contraindication like NYHA II-IV or coronary diseases). This is equal to a 2.3-fold increase in contraindications for COX-2 inhibition in comparison to the total patient collective at the Charité hospital of 28.4 % in 2009/2010. A pre-existing medication with (non-)selective cyclo-oxygenase inhibitors was determined in 55.5 % of the screened patients (135 patients) (Fig. 2).
Results
No patient showed a recurrence of the cSDH with the need of reoperation within the follow-up time of 8 weeks. After a prolonged follow-up time of 2 years, one patient with recurring cSDH (7.7 %, occurrence 9 months postoperatively) had to be operated on in the control group (A), as well as one patient with cSDH in the treatment group (B) (10 %, occurrence 6 months postoperatively).
In the control group (A), one serious adverse event (SAE) was noted. One patient suffered from prolonged nausea and vomiting; which led to a prolonged hospital stay; a definite discrimination to postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) could not be achieved.
In the treatment group (B), five events (four AEs and one SAE) occurred. Of the four AEs, one patient showed a persisting cSDH albeit with regression of the midline shift. One patient complained about self-limiting tinnitus after 7 days. Two patients experienced self-limiting dyshidrosis in the night-time for 5-7 days without elevation of the body temperature. The SAE was a superficial wound infection including one surgical procedure, followed by 10 days of antibiotic therapy, with full recovery of the patient.
Because of the low numbers of patients significance concerning the primary or secondary endpoints could not be retrieved.
Discussion
The COXIBRAIN study was closed early because of the insufficient study inclusion rate of patients. In the pre-study, the elevated number of contraindications in cSDH patients and the number of patients under antiplatelet therapy in the patient collective were, unfortunately, not obvious.
In cSDH patients, the probability of anticoagulation with unselective cyclo-oxygenase is highly increased. This is most likely related to an elevated odds ratio (OR) of 1.4 for development of a cSDH in patients with antiplatelet therapy (OR 4.3 for spontaneous cSDH development under antiplatelet therapy, whereas OR 1.7 for the development of cSDH in trauma patients under antiplatelet therapy) [4]. Additionally, a relevant group of patients was not eligible for the study because of the strict contraindications to Celecoxib (e.g. coronary heart disease, heart insufficiency, peripheral arterial occlusion, cerebrovascular diseases and neurological/psychiatric diseases). Patients with a cSDH show a high percentage of at least one of the above-mentioned contraindications.
In several neoplastic diseases (like mamma carcinoma, chondrosarcoma and glioblastoma multiforme), increased COX-2 expression was demonstrated [3, 20, 23]. Several clinical trials showed a decrease in tumour progression via an inhibition of the angiogenesis [9, 10, 16].
So COX-2 inhibition might lead in cSDH patients to a decelerated and thus reduced angiogenesis. Therefore, it may be an appropriate treatment in selected patients as the treatment group did not show an increased morbidity or mortality (as long as the low numbers of patients are representative).
Conclusions
Although conceptually appealing, an anti-angiogenic therapy of COX-2 inhibitors for cSDH could not be realised in this patient population due to the high prevalence of comorbidities excluding the administration of COX-2 inhibitors or the pre-existence of selective or unselective COX inhibition.
In the literature, alternative treatment approaches to diminish the recurrence rate of cSDH dominate now. Trials with intraoperatively applied tissue plasminogen activator (TPA) [19], perioperative application of corticoids [2] or an altered regiment of postoperative anticoagulation [6] show promising results but have to be executed on a larger scale.
References
Adhiyaman V, Asghar M, Ganeshram KN, Bhowmick BK (2002) Chronic subdural haematoma in the elderly. Postgrad Med J 78:71–75
Berghauser Pont LM, Dammers R, Schouten JW, Lingsma HF, Dirven CM (2012) Clinical factors associated with outcome in chronic subdural hematoma: a retrospective cohort study of patients on preoperative corticosteroid therapy. Neurosurgery 70:873–880, discussion 880
Bocca C, Ievolella M, Autelli R, Motta M, Mosso L, Torchio B, Bozzo F, Cannito S, Paternostro C, Colombatto S, Parola M, Miglietta A (2014) Expression of Cox-2 in human breast cancer cells as a critical determinant of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and invasiveness. Expert Opin Ther Targets 18:121–135
De Bonis P, Trevisi G, de Waure C, Sferrazza A, Volpe M, Pompucci A, Anile C, Mangiola A (2013) Antiplatelet/anticoagulant agents and chronic subdural hematoma in the elderly. PLoS One 8:e68732
Foelholm R, Waltimo O (1975) Epidemiology of chronic subdural haematoma. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 32:247–250
Forster MT, Mathé AK, Senft C, Scharrer I, Seifert V, Gerlach R (2010) The influence of preoperative anticoagulation on outcome and quality of life after surgical treatment of chronic subdural hematoma. J Clin Neurosci 17:975–979
Friede RL, Schachenmayr W (1978) The origin ofsubdural neomembranes. II. Fine structural of neomembranes. Am J Pathol 92:69–84
Fujisawa H, Nomura S, Tsuchida E, Ito H (1998) Serum protein exudation in chronic subdural haematomas: a mechanism for haematoma enlargement? Acta Neurochir (Wien) 140:161–165, discussion 165–166
Gately S, Kerbel R (2003) Therapeutic potential of selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors in the management of tumor angiogenesis. Prog Exp Tumor Res 37:179–192
Gately S, Li WW (2004) Multiple roles of COX-2 in tumor angiogenesis: a target for antiangiogenic therapy. Semin Oncol 31:2–11
Gjerris F, Schmidt K (1974) Chronic subdural hematoma. Surgery or mannitol treatment. J Neurosurg 40:639–642
Hohenstein A, Erber R, Schilling L, Weigel R (2005) Increased mRNA expression of VEGF within the hematoma and imbalance of angiopoietin-1 and −2 mRNA within the neomembranes of chronic subdural hematoma. J Neurotrauma 22:518–528
Iñiguez MA, Rodríguez A, Volpert OV, Fresno M, Redondo JM (2003) Cyclooxygenase-2: a therapeutic target in angiogenesis. Trends Mol Med 9:73–78
Kim JH, Kang DS, Kong MH, Song KY (2011) Chronic subdural hematoma treated by small or large craniotomy with membranectomy as the initial treatment. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 50:103–108
Kudo H, Kuwamura K, Izawa I, Sawa H, Tamaki N (1992) Chronic subdural hematoma in elderly people: present status on Awaji Island and epidemiological prospect. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 32:207–209
Masferrer JL, Koki A, Seibert K (1999) COX-2 inhibitors. A new class of antiangiogenic agents. Ann N Y Acad Sci 889:84–86
Mori K, Mitsuoka H, Cho K, Tajima A, Maeda M (1996) Rate constant of gadolinium (Gd)-DTPA transfer into chronic subdural hematomas. Neurol Res 18:126–134
Moskala M, Goscinski I, Kaluza J, Polak J, Krupa M, Adamek D, Pitynski K, Miodonski AJ (2007) Morphological aspects of the traumatic chronic subdural hematoma capsule: SEM studies. Microsc Microanal 13:211–219
Neils DM, Singanallur PS, Wang H, Tracy P, Klopfenstein J, Dinh D, Elwood PW, Fassett D, McCall T, Lin J, Tsung A (2012) Recurrence-free chronic subdural hematomas: a retrospective analysis of the instillation of tissue plasminogen activator in addition to twist drill or burr hole drainage in the treatment of chronic subdural hematomas. World Neurosurg 78:145–149
Prayson RA, Castilla EA, Vogelbaum MA, Barnett GH (2002) Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression by immunohistochemistry in glioblastoma multiforme. Ann Diagn Pathol 6:148–153
Rohde V, Graf G, Hassler W (2002) Complications of burr-hole craniostomy and closed-system drainage for chronic subdural hematomas: a retrospective analysis of 376 patients. Neurosurg Rev 25:89–94
Sato S, Suzuki J (1975) Ultrastructural observations of the capsule of chronic subdural hematoma in various clinical stages. J Neurosurg 43:569–578
Schrage YM, Machado I, Meijer D, Briaire-de Bruijn I, van den Akker BE, Taminiau AH, Kalinski T, Llombart-Bosch A, Bovée JV (2010) COX-2 expression in chondrosarcoma: a role for celecoxib treatment? Eur J Cancer 46(616–624):2010
Shono T, Inamura T, Morioka T, Matsumoto K, Suzuki SO, Ikezaki K, Iwaki T, Fukui M (2001) Vascular endothelial growth factor in chronic subdural haematomas. J Clin Neurosci 8:411–415
Sim YW, Min KS, Lee MS, Kim YG, Kim DH (2012) Recent changes in risk factors of chronic subdural hematoma. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 52:234–239
Stippler M, Ramirez P, Berti A, Macindoe C, Villalobos N, Murray-Krezan C (2013) Chronic subdural hematoma patients aged 90 years and older. Neurol Res 35:243–246
Stroobandt G, Fransen P, Thauvoy C, Menard E (1995) Pathogenetic factors in chronic subdural haematoma and causes of recurrence after drainage. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 137:6–14
Suzuki K, Takano S, Nose T, Doi M, Ohashi N (1999) Increased concentration of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in chronic subdural hematoma. J Trauma 46:532–533
Tabuchi S, Kadowaki M (2014) Chronic subdural hematoma in patients over 90 years old in a super-aged society. J Clin Med Res 6:379–383
Vaquero J, Zurita M, Cincu R (2002) Vascular endothelial growth-permeability factor in granulation tissue of chronic subdural haematomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 144:343–346, discussion 347
Weigel R, Schilling L, Schmiedek P (2001) Specific pattern of growth factor distribution in chronic subdural hematoma (CSH): evidence for an angiogenic disease. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 143:811–818, discussion 819
Weigel R, Schmiedek P, Krauss JK (2003) Outcome of contemporary surgery for chronic subdural haematoma: evidence based review. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 74:937–943
Williams GR, Baskaya MK, Menendez J, Polin R, Willis B, Nanda A (2001) Burr-hole versus twist-drill drainage for the evacuation of chronic subdural haematoma: a comparison of clinical results. J Clin Neurosci 8:551–554
Yamashima T, Yamamoto S (1984) Clinicopathological study of acute subdural haematoma in the chronic healing stage. Clinical, histological and ultrastructural comparisons with chronic subdural haematoma. Neurochirurgia (Stuttg) 27:98–105
Yamashima T, Yamamoto S, Friede RL (1983) The role of endothelial gap junctions in the enlargement of chronic subdural hematomas. J Neurosurg 59:298–303
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the participating study staff in the study centres at Greifswald, Mannheim, München and Berlin for their contribution to the study and the treatment of the patients. We would also like to thank the KKS Charité for supporting the set-up of the study protocol and handling of the regulatory affairs.
Financial support
This study was funded by the NeuroCure excellence centre at the Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
The NeuroCure Cluster of Excellence at the Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin provided financial support in the form of general funding for the set-up of the study protocol as well as the study’s execution (e.g. biostatistical consultancy, block randomisation, monitoring, handling of regulatory affairs). There was no specific funding for an individual author. The sponsor had no role in the design or conduct of this research.
Conflict of interest
All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organisation or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in this study.
Disclosure
The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.
Additional information
The study was registered in the European Clinical Trials Database under the Eudra-CT number 2008-000247-34
An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-016-3016-9.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schaumann, A., Klene, W., Rosenstengel, C. et al. COXIBRAIN: results of the prospective, randomised, phase II/III study for the selective COX-2 inhibition in chronic subdural haematoma patients. Acta Neurochir 158, 2039–2044 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-016-2949-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-016-2949-3