Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
It is acknowledged that Table 1 in the technical note contains equations with mistakes. This table, properly checked, shows that all the equations, except Yagiz’s equation, are correct. Yagiz’s equation was written as UCS = 0.26 VP3.453. It should have been written as UCS = 0.258 VP3.543.
With reference to the comments about the comparison of the results obtained by Jamshidi et al. (2018) with those available in the literature (Table 2 and Figs. 1–3 in Discussion), attention needs to be paid to the estimated UCS values obtained with the equations proposed in Jamshidi et al. (2018) and those reported by different researchers.
Table 1 shows the correlations between UCS and VP given by different researchers as reported in the available literature. The equation given in Jamshidi et al. (2018) is compared with the equations proposed by the authors who have correlated UCS and VP. It is noted that in our study a good relation in logarithmic terms is found between UCS and VP with a determination coefficient (R2) equal to 0.82 (Eq. 1).
The difference in the (R2) value obtained in our study and given by other researchers in Table 1 is thought to be due to the difference in the range of physical and mechanical properties of the tested rock types.
The results of a simple regression analysis show R2 to be 0.82 between UCS and VP (Eq. 1). On the other hand, R2 based on a multivariate regression analysis indicates that ρ and n have important influence on the correlation between UCS and VP (Eqs. 2 and 3, respectively).
As a result, the values of R2 show that the performance of the multivariate regression equations is higher than that derived from the simple regression equation:
where UCS is the estimated value of the uniaxial compressive strength, ρ and n are the density and porosity, respectively, and VP is the P-wave velocity.
It is noted that, when VP, ρ and n are taken into consideration for estimating UCS (Eq. 4), no change in R2 is obtained.
References
Azimian A, Ajalloeian R (2015) Empirical correlation of physical and mechanical properties of marly rocks with P wave velocity. Arab J Geosci 8:2069–2079
Cobanoglu I, Celik SB (2008) Estimation of uniaxial compressive strength from point load strength, Schmidt hardness and P-wave velocity. Bull Eng Geol Environ 67:491–498
Diamantis K, Bellas S, Migiros G, Gartzos E (2011) Correlating wave velocities with physical, mechanical properties and petrographic characteristics of peridotites from the central Greece. Geotech Geol Eng 29:1049–1062
Jamshidi A, Nikudel MR, Khamehchiyan M, Zarei Sahamieh R (2016) The effect of specimen diameter size on uniaxial compressive strength, P-wave velocity and the correlation between them. Geomech Geoeng Int J 11(1):13–19
Jamshidi A, Zamanian H, Zarei Sahamieh R (2018) The effect of density and porosity on the correlation between uniaxial compressive strength and P-wave velocity. Rock Mech Rock Eng 51(4):1279–1286
Kahraman S (2001) Evaluation of simple methods for assessing the uniaxial compressive strength of rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 38:981–994
Khandelwal M (2013) Correlating P-wave velocity with the physicomechanical properties of different rocks. Pure Appl Geophys 170:507–514
Kilic A, Teymen A (2008) Determination of mechanical properties of rocks using simple methods. Bull Eng Geol Environ 67:237–244
Sarkar K, Vishal V, Singh TN (2012) An empirical correlation of index geomechanical parameters with the compressional wave velocity. Geotech Geol Eng 30:469–479
Sharma PK, Singh TN (2008) A correlation between P-wave velocity, impact strength index, slake durability index and uniaxial compressive strength. Bull Eng Geol Environ 67:17–22
Turgrul A, Zarif IH (1999) Correlation of mineralogical and textural characteristics with engineering properties of selected granitic rocks from Turkey. Eng Geol 51:303–317
Yagiz S (2011) P-wave velocity test for the assessment of some geotechnical properties of rock materials. Bull Mater Sci 34:943–957
Yagiz S (2018) Comments on; The effects of density and porosity on the correlation between uniaxial compressive strength and P-wave velocity by Jamshidi, Zamanian, Zarei Sahamieh. Rock Mech Rock Eng 51:1279–1286
Yasar E, Erdogan Y (2004) Correlating sound velocity with the density, compressive strength and Young’s modulus of carbonate rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41:871–875
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jamshidi, A. Reply to the Discussion by Saffet Yagiz on “The Effect of Density and Porosity on the Correlation Between Uniaxial Compressive Strength and P-Wave Velocity”. Rock Mech Rock Eng 52, 639–640 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-018-1701-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-018-1701-0