Abstract
This article reviews the extent of blood loss in spine surgery for scoliosis corrections in the pediatric age group. An extensive literature review presents blood loss values in surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, cerebral palsy, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, spinal muscular atrophy, and myelomeningocoele. The underlying disorder plays a major role in determining the extent of blood loss. Blood loss is considerably higher in those patients with a neuromuscular scoliosis compared with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Within the neuromuscular group those with Duchenne muscular dystrophy demonstrate the highest mean levels of blood loss. Blood loss is also shown to be progressively greater with increasing numbers of vertebral levels incorporated into the fusion, with posterior fusions compared to anterior fusions, and in those patients having both anterior and posterior fusions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Blood loss is an important concern in performance of spinal surgery. This article will review the extent of blood loss in spine surgery for scoliosis and kyphoscoliosis corrections in the pediatric age group since these are the procedures which are most extensive and subject to the greatest amounts of loss.
The pediatric age group refers to the first two decades of life, with the majority of spinal surgical procedures done in the second decade. Distinction must be made between studies in pediatric and adult patients, since blood loss in the adult patient can be proportionately greater than in the pediatric age group for the same procedure. The modern era of scoliosis surgery will be reviewed involving procedures performed from the early 1960s onward using spinal instrumentation and spine fusion for correction and stabilization of deformity.
The underlying disorder plays a major role in determining the extent of blood loss. Blood loss is considerably higher in those patients whose scoliosis is associated with a neuromuscular disease compared with those in the idiopathic category. Blood loss is also shown to be progressively greater with increasing numbers of vertebral levels incorporated into the fusion and with posterior fusions compared to anterior fusions.
Considerations regarding literature reports of blood loss in scoliosis surgery
Blood loss determinations
Limitations must be recognized in the accuracy of intra-operative blood loss determinations and, therefore, in the value of comparing studies from one center to another. Blood loss is reported as “estimated blood loss” (EBL) since this represents the only practical way that operating room determinations can be made. Since these are estimates they are not rigidly accurate or reproducible as they are dependent on a combination of numbers including: volume of blood suctioned from the operative field (from which irrigating fluid must be subtracted), determination of blood loss collected on sponges (as determined by weighing by the operating room nurses), and estimates of blood loss on drapes, gowns, and floor (which is educated guesswork at best). To a great extent the value determined is dependent on the degree of rigor used by the operating room team in making the determination.
Measurement values used to present information
Different ways of presenting blood loss information are used in different papers reporting on scoliosis surgery. In almost all studies the extent of blood loss is reported in total milliliters (mL or ml) or cubic centimeters (cc). A second way is by determination of blood loss per vertebral level included in the fusion (total blood loss divided by number of vertebral levels in the fusion). A third way calculates the blood loss as a percentage in relation to the patient’s estimated blood volume (EBV). The EBV is generally calculated to be 70 ml/kg (weight) [21]. For a 50 kg patient the EBV is 70×50=3,500 ml. A blood loss of 1,000 ml in that patient would represent a 28.6% loss. Wider presentation of blood loss as percent EBV would be helpful since this value provides the most physiologic indicator by taking patient size into account.
Diagnostic category of scoliosis
Awareness of the disorder associated with the scoliosis is essential since distinction must be made between idiopathic scoliosis and secondary scoliosis, which usually refers to neuromuscular disorders causing the scoliosis. Some reviews lump all types of neuromuscular deformity together but in many reports they are subdivided into the common variants of neuromuscular scoliosis which are cerebral palsy, myelomenigocoele, and Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Each of these disorders has differing responses regarding blood loss during surgery as well as differing needs for spinal correction and stabilization.
Types of surgical procedure
Distinction is made regarding blood loss in surgery between solitary posterior spinal fusions, solitary anterior spinal fusions, and combined anterior and posterior spinal fusions (including consideration of whether the anterior-posterior procedures are done as a single operation or separately with 1–2 weeks between stages).
Primary reason for the report from which blood loss information is abstracted
A few papers in this review were directed specifically to determining blood loss, usually comparing one anesthetic method to another or the use of a particular blood loss reducing agent. Since this article provides an overview of the problem of blood loss in pediatric spine fusion surgery, we have used the control group values from such studies but have usually also presented findings with the particular modification used.
Since limiting intra-operative blood loss is universally recognized as highly important, essentially all procedures done since the 1970s have incorporated several control mechanisms without necessarily indicating so in reports. These include: minimizing abdominal pressure with positioning, some form of hypotensive anesthesia, blood transfusion at pre-determined levels of hemoglobin, early replacement of platelets and fibrinogen, and surgical techniques stressing rigorous mechanical wound hemostasis [21, 26, 47, 57, 67]. For these reasons, most comparative studies relating to methods diminishing intra-operative blood loss are not scientifically controlled.
The large majority of papers in this review addressed problems relating to surgical technique, stabilization systems, and concerns specific to particular disorders and types of scoliosis. We have abstracted blood loss data as presented in each paper and derived EBL/vertebral segment and percent EBV numbers if sufficient information was provided.
The paper is designed to review intra-operative blood loss data. Some reports also assess post-operative blood loss but usually as separate determinations. In the few instances where combined data only were provided we have indicated that fact, and have used such studies only if the author indicated that post-operative loss was negligible.
Review of blood loss data from the literature
Blood loss data from the literature are presented in Tables 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. In each table we have listed the study (article) with year of publication and year(s) when surgery was performed, estimated mean blood loss (ml or cc) with ranges and/or standard deviations, the number of operative procedures in the study, surgical technique with bone graft information, mean EBL per individual vertebral level in fusion, mean EBL as a percentage of total EBV, and additional comments. In each table the studies are listed in order of mean EBL, beginning with those with the least loss reported to those with the highest amounts.
Table 1 reviews posterior spinal fusions for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), Table 2 reviews anterior spinal fusions for AIS, Table 3 reviews spinal fusions for cerebral palsy, Table 4 reviews posterior spinal fusions for DMD, Table 5 reviews spinal fusions for pooled neuromuscular disorders (both anterior and posterior approaches), and Table 6 reviews spinal fusions for other neuromuscular disorders including spinal muscular atrophy and myelomeningocoele.
Blood loss in scoliosis surgery assessed by underlying disorder
Awareness of potential blood loss problem with any spinal fusion surgery
The operating team must have a high degree of preparation for blood loss in any spinal surgery for scoliosis in the pediatric age group, regardless of etiology and surgical approach to correction. Although AIS treated by spinal fusion has the lowest mean values for blood loss in scoliosis procedures, the ranges of blood loss measurements in all studies are wide, and amounts necessitating blood transfusion are often noted for both anterior and posterior approaches (Tables 1 and 2).
Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
AIS patients have the lowest amount of mean blood loss per procedure of all operative scoliosis groups. In the group treated by posterior spinal fusion (Table 1) in several studies the mean EBL ranges between 600 and 1,000 ml, and most studies document mean ranges between 750 and 1,500 ml. Treatment of AIS by anterior spinal fusion (Table 2) yields even lower mean EBL values, with most studies ranging between 350 and 650 ml and almost all less than 1,000 ml.
While the ranges of EBL per vertebral level included in the fusion in AIS are similar for posterior approaches (65–150 ml) and anterior approaches (60–135 ml), the overall blood loss is considerably less in the anterior group because fewer levels need to be fused to gain acceptable correction. The number of levels fused in the anterior surgery group is usually between 4 and 7 while the posterior group involves 9 to 12 (Tables 1 and 2).
Cerebral palsy
Blood loss is considerably higher in cerebral palsy patients undergoing scoliosis correction compared to patients with AIS (Table 3). The mean blood loss ranges in posterior approaches are concentrated between 1,300 and 2,200 ml, while many in the anterior group range from 900 to 1,800 ml. Blood loss per vertebral level fused is approximately similar for anterior and posterior approaches, although greater than AIS amounts, with most studies reporting losses between 100 and 190 ml per level. Blood loss amounts are much greater in posterior approaches primarily because of the larger number of vertebral levels involved; 13–15 with posterior procedures and 5–7 with anterior procedures.
Duchenne muscular dystrophy
Blood loss in DMD patients is even higher in most series than amounts reported for cerebral palsy patients. Several large studies have reported mean blood loss amounts from 2,500 ml to 4,000 ml+ (Table 4). Other studies have reported lower mean values of 930–1,680 ml but even these reports show some patients at the 3,000, 4,000 ml levels. The blood loss amounts are further magnified in effect since many DMD patients are small in stature with low body weight. Fusion is invariably performed from the upper thoracic region to the sacrum encompassing 13–16 levels. Mean values of EBL per vertebral level are in the 200–280 ml range, although more recent studies with less blood loss are being reported.
Studies on pooled neuromuscular disorders
Many studies on scoliosis surgery pool data from patients with neuromuscular disorders and do not distinguish between cerebral palsy, DMD, etc. Much valuable information is still provided, especially concerning blood loss with varying approaches. Most of these papers involve complex, severe deformities in which individual patients are treated by both anterior and posterior approaches. Mean EBL levels for anterior procedures are around 1,000 ml but posterior approaches range from 2,000 to 3,500 ml. The EBL per individual vertebral level in the fusion is correspondingly high as well.
Information concerning entities such as spinal muscular atrophy, myelomeningocoele, and anterior approaches alone for selected neuromuscular disorders
Table 6 provides information from smaller numbers of studies. Blood loss in spinal muscular atrophy surgery is considerable but distinctly less than in DMD. In one group of 26 the mean EBL was 1,437 ml with EBL/vertebral level 103 ml. Most reports on spinal fusion in myelomeningocoele have been pooled with other neuromuscular disorders and reported in the studies listed in Table 5. One study on this entity showed mean EBL levels of 1,960 ml for posterior fusion without instrumentation, 1,729 ml for posterior fusion with Harrington rod stabilization, and 1,841 and 2,134 ml for combined anterior fusion and posterior fusion with instrumentation. The use of improved anterior instrumentation for myelomenigocoele is shown by two studies using the Cotrel-Dubousset-Hopf instrumentation with a mean EBL of 800 ml in 16 cases in one report and a value of only 539 ml in 21 neuromuscular patients, 12 of whom had myelomeningocoele, in another.
Key factors determining amount of blood loss during scoliosis surgery
The material presented above clearly documents the extent of intra-operative blood loss during scoliosis surgery in both AIS and secondary scoliosis in patients with an underlying neuromuscular disorder. It is evident that blood loss is increased in patients with a neuromuscular diagnosis and an increasingly large number of vertebral levels included in the fusion. Studies assessing patients by the specific neuromuscular disorder demonstrate increasing losses as one moves from the cerebral palsy group, to spinal muscular atrophy and myelomenigocoele, and then to DMD which has the highest mean blood loss values. Posterior spine fusion procedures tend to lose more blood than anterior procedures, although most of this loss is due to the considerably larger number of vertebral levels fused in posterior approaches.
Several detailed papers have quantified the blood loss differences with statistical validation in relation to these matters. In one study neuromuscular patients had an almost seven times higher risk of losing greater than 50% of their estimated total blood volume during scoliosis surgery compared to idiopathic scoliosis patients when the extent of surgery (number of segments fused), age, weight, and pre-operative coagulation profile were controlled for statistically [19]. Another study showed that an underlying neuromuscular disease, lower body weight, and a higher number of vertebrae fused independently predicted a greater number of allogeneic red blood cell transfusions [47].
A large study of 319 patients operated between 1984 and 1993 clearly correlated the amount of bleeding with the disorder causing the scoliosis. The mean peri-operative bleeding was 9.8 ml/kg for idiopathic scoliosis (159 patients), 14.1 ml/kg for secondary scoliosis [including cerebral palsy (22 patients), myelomeningocoele (spina bifida) (18 patients) and vertebral malformations (18 patients)], and 29.3 ml/kg for muscular dystrophy and spinal muscular atrophy (31 patients) [23].
Other factors increasing blood loss are the length of time for the surgery to be done and the extra loss associated with harvesting autogenous iliac crest blood. In one study involving 145 patients undergoing Cotrel-Dubousset posterior fusions mean blood loss was 500 ml at 2 h, 1,500 ml at 3 h, and 2,400 ml at 4.5 h. The same study documented 1,828 ml blood loss with autogenous iliac crest grafts and 1,120 ml when autogenous bone was not used [57].
There are several reasons why blood loss is greater in the neuromuscular patients. Some are easy to understand and include: a larger number of vertebral levels fused, more frequent resort to both anterior and posterior procedures and the fact that the patients are often younger and of less weight than patients with idiopathic scoliosis. A recent study also documented a prolonged prothrombin time and decrease in factor VII activity greater than seen in idiopathic patients intra-operatively. The authors suggested that consumption of clotting factors during spinal surgery along with dilution of clotting factors further enhanced blood loss [38]. In addition, many neuromuscular patients are poorly nourished and have been on seizure medications, some of which can affect coagulation.
Awareness of the extent of blood loss with scoliosis surgery helps with pre-operative preparation and intra-operative management and should enhance the study and development of methods to decrease its occurrence.
References
Albers HW, Hresko T, Carlson J, Hall JE (2000) Comparison of single- and dual-rod techniques for posterior spinal instrumentation in the treatments of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 25:1944–1949
Allen BL, Ferguson RL (1982) L-rod instrumentation for scoliosis in cerebral palsy. J Pediatr Orthop 2:87–90
Barr SJ, Schuette AM, Emans JB (1997) Lumbar pedicle screws versus hooks: results in double major curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 22:1369–1379
Basobas L, Mardjetko S, Hammerberg K, Lubicky J (2003) Selective anterior fusion and instrumentation for the treatment of neuromuscular scoliosis. Spine 28(20S):S245–248
Bell DF, Moseley CF, Koreska J (1989) Unit rod segmental spinal instrumentation in the management of patients with progressive neuromuscular spinal deformity. Spine 14:1301–1307
Bellen P, Hody JL, Clairbois J, Denis N, Soudon PH (1993) The surgical treatment of spinal deformities in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J Orthop Surg 7:48–57
Benson ER, Thomson JD, Smith BG, Banta JV (1998) Results and morbidity in a consecutive series of patients undergoing spinal fusion for neuromuscular scoliosis. Spine 23:2308–2318
Bentley G, Haddad F, Bull TM, Seingry D (2001) The treatment of scoliosis in muscular dystrophy using modified Luque and Harrington-Luque instrumentation. J Bone Joint Surg 83B:22–28
Bernstein RM, Hall JE (1998) Solid rod short segment anterior fusion in thoracolumbar scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop B7:124–131
Betz RR, Harms J, Clements DH, Lenke LG, Lowe TG, Shufflebarger HL, Jeszenzsky S, Beele B (1999) Comparison of anterior and posterior instrumentation for correction of adolescent thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 24:225–239
Bitan FD, Neuwirth MG, Kuflik PL, Casden A, Bloom N, Siddiqui S (2002) The use of short and rigid anterior instrumentation in the treatment of idiopathic thoracolumbar scoliosis. Spine 27:1553–1557
Boachie-Adjei O, Lonstein JE, Winter RB, Koop S, Brink KV, Denis F (1989) Management of neuromuscular spinal deformities with Luque segmental instrumentation. J Bone Joint Surg 71A:548–562
Bonnett C, Brown JC, Grow T (1976) Thoracolumbar scoliosis in cerebral palsy. J Bone Joint Surg 58A:328–336
Bullman V, Halm HF, Nieyemer T, Hackenberg L, Liljenqvist U (2003) Dual-rod correction and instrumentation of idiopathic scoliosis with the Halm-Zielke instrumentation. Spine 28:1306–1313
Bulman WA, Dormans JP, Ecker ML, Drummond DS (1996) Posterior spinal fusion for scoliosis in patients with cerebral palsy: a comparison of Luque rod and unit rod instrumentation. J Pediatr Orthop 16:314–323
Copley LAB, Richards S, Safavi FZ, Newton PO (1999) Hemodilution as a method to reduce transfusion requirements in adolescent spine fusion surgery. Spine 24:219–224
Dias RD, Miller F, Dabney K, Lipton G, Temple T (1996) Surgical correction of spinal deformity using a rod in children with cerebral palsy. J Pediatr Orthop 16:734–740
Du Toit G, Relton JES, Gillespie R (1978) Acute haemodilutional autotransfusion in the surgical management of scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg 60B:178–180
Edler A, Murray DJ, Forbes RB (2003) Blood loss during posterior spinal fusion surgery in patients with neuromuscular disease: is there an increased risk? Paediatr Anaesth 13:818–822
Erwin WD, Dickson JH, Harrington PR (1976) The postoperative management of scoliosis patients treated with Harrington instrumentation and fusion. J Bone Joint Surg 58A:479–782
Feldman JM, Roth JV, Bjoraker DG (1995) Maximum blood savings by acute normovolemic hemodilution. Anesth Analg 80:108–113
Ferguson RL, Hansen MM, Nicholas DA, Allen BL (1996) Same-day versus staged anterior-posterior spinal surgery in a neuromuscular scoliosis population: the evaluation of medical complications. J Pediatr Orthop 16:193–303
Fievez E, Schultze-Balin C, Herbaux B, Dalmas S, Scherpereel P (1995) Etude du saignement dans la chirurgie de la scoliose. Interventions par voie posterieure chez 319 adolescents. Cah Anesthesiol 43:425–433
Floman Y, Micheli LJ, Penny JN, Riseborough EJ, Hall JE (1982) Combined anterior and posterior fusion in seventy-three spinally deformed patients: indications, results, and complications. Clin Orthop 164:110–121
Florentino-Pineda I, Blakemore LC, Thompson GH, Poe-Kochert C, Adler P, Tripi P (2001) The effect of ε-aminocaproic acid on perioperative blood loss in patients with idiopathic scoliosis undergoing posterior spinal fusion: a preliminary study. Spine 26:1147–1151
Florentino-Pineda I, Thompson GH, Poe-Kochert C, Huang RP, Haber LL, Blakemore LC (2004) The effect of amicar on perioperative blood loss in idiopathic scoliosis: the results of a prospective, randomized double blind study. Spine 29:233–238
Fox HJ, Thomas CH, Thompson AG (1997) Spinal instrumentation for Duchenne’s muscular dystrophy: experience of hypotensive anaethesia to minimize blood loss. J Pediatr Orthop 17:750–753
Gersoff WK, Renshaw TS (1988) The treatment of scoliosis in cerebral palsy by posterior spinal fusion with Luque-rod segmental instrumentation. J Bone Joint Surg 70A:41–44
Gibson DA, Koreska J, Robertson D, Kahn III A, Albisser AM (1978) The management of spinal deformity in Duchenne’s muscular dystrophy. Orthop Clin North Am 9:437–450
Guadagni J, Drummond D, Breed A (1984) Improved postoperative course following modified segmental instrumentation and posterior spinal fusion for idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 4:405:408
Guay J, Haig M, Lortie L, Guertin MC, Poitras B (1994) Predicting blood loss in surgery for idiopathic scoliosis. Can J Anaesth 41:775–781
Guidera KJ, Hooten J, Weatherly W, Highhouse M, Castellvi A, Ogden JA, Pugh L, Cook S (1993) Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation: results in 52 patients. Spine 18:427–431
Harrington PR, Dickson JH (1973) An eleven-year clinical investigation of Harrington instrumentation. Clin Orthop 93:113–130
Heller KD, Wirtz DC, Siebert CH, Forst R (2001) Spinal stabilization in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: principles of treatment and record of 31 operative treated cases. J Pediatr Orthop 10:18–24
Hopf CG, Eysel P, Dubousset J (1997) Operative treatment of scoliosis with Cotrel-Dubousset-Hopf instrumentation. Spine 22:617–628
Hsu LCS, Sucherman J, Tang SC, Leong JCY (1982) Dwyer instrumentation in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg 64B:536–541
Kaneda K, Shono Y, Satoh S, Abumi K (1997) Anterior correction of thoracic scoliosis with Kaneda anterior spinal system: a preliminary report. Spine 22:1358–1368
Kannan S, Meert KL, Mooney JF, Hillman-Wiseman C, Warrier I (2002) Bleeding and coagulation changes during spinal fusion surgery: a comparison of neuromuscular and idiopathic scoliosis patients. Pediatr Crit Care Med 3:364–369
Lawhon SM, Kahn A, Crawford AH, Brinker MS (1984) Controlled hypotensive anesthesia during spinal surgery: a retrospective study. Spine 9:450–453
Lenke LG, Bridwell K, Baldus C, Blanke K, Schoenecker PL (1992) Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg 74A:1056–1067
Lonstein JE, Akbarnia BA (1983) Operative treatment of spinal deformities in patients with cerebral palsy or mental retardation. J Bone Joint Surg 65A:43–55
Lovallo JL, Banta JV, Renshaw TS (1986) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated by Harrington-rod distraction and fusion. J Bone Joint Surg 68A:1326–1330
Lowe TG, Peters JD (1993) Anterior spinal fusion with Zielke instrumentation for idiopathic scoliosis: a frontal and sagittal curve analysis in 36 patients. Spine 18:423–426
Majad ME, Castro FP, Holt RT (2000) Anterior fusion for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 25:696–702
Marchesi D, Arlet V, Stricker U, Aebi M (1997) Modification of the original Luque technique in the treatment of Duchenne’s neuromuscular scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 17:743–749
McMaster M (1991) Luque rod instrumentation in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparative study with Harrington instrumentation. J Bone Joint Surg 73B:982–989
Meert KL, Kannan S, Mooney JF (2002) Predictors of red cell transfusion in children and adolescents undergoing spinal fusion surgery. Spine 27:2137–2142
Moran MM, Kroon D, Tredwell SJ, Wadsworth LD (1995) The role of autologous blood transfusion in adolescents undergoing spinal surgery. Spine 20:532–536
Moskowitz A, Trommanhauser S (1993) Surgical and clinical results of scoliosis surgery using Zielke instrumentation. Spine 18:2444–2451
Mubarak SJ, Morin WD, Leach J (1993) Spinal fusion in Duchenne muscular dystrophy—fixation and fusion to the sacropelvis? J Pediatr Orthop 13:752–757
Neustadt JB, Shufflebarger Hl, Cammisa FP (1992) Spinal fusion to the pelvis augmented by Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation for neuromuscular scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 12:465–469
Newton PO, Marks M, Faro F, Betz R, Clements D, Haher T, Lenke L, Lowe T, Merola A, Wenger D (2003) Use of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery to reduce perioperative morbidity in scoliosis surgery. Spine 28:249–254
Newton PO, Wenger DR, Mubarak SJ, Meyer RS (1997) Anterior release and fusion in pediatric spinal deformity: a comparison of early outcome and cost of thoracoscopic and open thoracotomy approaches. Spine 22:1398–1406
Noordeen MHH, Haddad FS, Muntoni F, Gobbi P, Hollyer JS, Bentley G (1999) Blood loss in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: vascular smooth muscle dysfunction? J Pediatr Orthop B8:212–215
Osebold WR, Mayfield JK, Winter RB, Moe JH (1982) Surgical treatment of paralytic scoliosis associated with myelomeningocele. J Bone Joint Surg 64A:841–856
Patel NJ, Patel BS, Paskin S, Laufer S, Branch L (1985) Induced moderate hypotensive anesthesia for spinal fusion and Harrington-rod instrumentation. J Bone Joint Surg 67A:1384–1387
Pouliquen JC, Jean N, Noat M, Boyer J-M, Yannoutsos H (1990) Les economies de sang en orthopedie pediatrique. Etude a propos de 145 arthrodeses vertebrales posterieures. Chirurgie 116:303–311
Ramirez N, Richards BS, Warren PD, Williams GR (1997) Complications after posterior spinal fusion in Duchenne’s muscular dystrophy. J Pediatr Orthop 17:109–114
Richards BS, Herring JA, Johnston CE, Birch JG, Roach JW (1993) Treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using Texas Scottish Rite Hospital instrumentation. Spine 19:1598–1605
Sakai DN, Hsu JD, Bonnett CA, Brown JC (1977) Stabilization of the collapsing spine in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Clin Orthop 128:256–260
Shapiro F, Sethna N, Colan S, Wohl ME, Specht L (1992) Spinal fusion in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a multidisciplinary approach. Muscle Nerve 15:604–614
Shufflebarger HL, Geck MJ, Clark CE (2004) The posterior approach for lumbar and thoracolumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: posterior shortening and pedicle screws. Spine 29:269–276
Siller TA, Dickson JH, Erwin WD (1996) Efficacy and cost considerations of intraoperative autologous transfusion in spinal fusion for idiopathic scoliosis with predeposited blood. Spine 21:848–852
Sponseller PD, Whiffen JR, Drummond DS (1986) Interspinous process segmental spinal instrumentation for scoliosis in cerebral palsy. J Pediatr Orthop 6:559–563
Swank SM, Brown JC, Perry RE (1982) Spinal fusion in Duchenne’s muscular dystrophy. Spine 7:484–491
Swank SM, Cohen DS, Brown JC (1989) Spine fusion in cerebral palsy with l-rod segmental spinal instrumentation: a comparison of single and two-stage combined approach with Zielke instrumentation. Spine 14:750–758
Tate DE, Friedman RJ (1992) Blood conservation in spinal surgery. Review of current techniques. Spine 17:1450–1456
Theroux MC, Corddry DH, Tietz AE, Miller F, Peoples JD, Kettrick RG (1997) A study of desmopressin and blood loss during spinal fusion for neuromuscular scoliosis. Anesthesiology 87:260–267
Turi M, Johnston CE, Richards BS (1993) Anterior correction of idiopathic scoliosis using TSRH instrumentation. Spine 18:417–422
Weimann RL, Gibson DA, Moseley CF, Jones DC (1983) Surgical stabilization of the spine in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Spine 8:776–780
Youngman PME, Edgar MA (1985) Posterior spinal fusion and instrumentation in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 67:313–317
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shapiro, F., Sethna, N. Blood loss in pediatric spine surgery. Eur Spine J 13 (Suppl 1), S6–S17 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0760-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0760-y