Abstract
A significant proportion of cancer survivors will experience some form of mental health compromise across domains including mood, anxiety, psychosis, eating disorders, and substance use. This psychopathology within cancer survivors is related to a range of negative outcomes and can also have a substantial negative impact on quality of life. Along with psychopathology, cognitive impairments are also commonly experienced, resulting in deficits in memory, reasoning, decision-making, speed of processing, and concentration, collectively referred to as cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI). Within the non-oncology literature, cognitive deficits are consistently demonstrated to be a key transdiagnostic aetiological feature of psychopathology, functionally contributing to the development and perpetuation of symptoms. Whilst there is an acknowledgement of the role mental health concerns might play in the development of and perception of CRCI, there has been limited acknowledgement and research exploring the potential for CRCI to functionally contribute toward the development of transdiagnostic psychopathology in cancer survivors beyond simply psychosocial distress. Given the theoretical and empirical evidence suggesting cognitive deficits to be an aetiological factor in psychopathology, we provide a rationale for the potential for CRCI to be a factor in the development and perpetuation of transdiagnostic psychopathology in cancer survivors. This potential functional association has significant implications for risk identification, prevention, treatment, and supportive cancer care approaches regarding psychopathology in cancer survivorship. We conclude by providing directions for future research in this area.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Mental health in cancer survivorship
Cancer survivors (i.e. individuals with a history of cancer, from diagnosis through to the end-of-life, including all types, stages, and trajectories) are at a significantly greater risk of experiencing mental ill-health when compared to the general population [1]. It is commonly reported that cancer survivors often experience heightened psychological distress, depression, anxiety [1], and symptoms relating to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD; [2]). However, cancer survivors frequently exhibit a wider spectrum of psychopathology, with for example significantly heightened rates of symptoms related to psychotic disorders, substance use disorders, personality disorders [1], eating disorders [3], and obsessive–compulsive disorder [4]. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis found a notably high, 1.46) hazard ratio for developing mental illness after cancer [5]. Further, many cancer survivors experience a co-occurrence of psychopathologies [1, 6]. For example, estimates indicate that almost half of cancer survivors who have received a diagnosis of a mental disorder, will also have met the criteria for a second, and almost half of those cancer survivors will have met a diagnosis for a third mental disorder [e.g. 6]. Psychopathology within cancer survivors is related to a range of negative outcomes and can also have a substantial negative impact on quality of life [1, 7, 8].
The co-occurrence of psychopathologies within cancer survivorship and the general population is well established [9, 10]. In general, the transdiagnostic hypothesis postulates that there may be underlying common mechanisms to psychological symptoms and taxonomies, contributing to the onset, maintenance, clinical management, and recovery from mental health concerns [11]. Decades of data-driven research support the more accurate viewpoint of understanding mental health as existing dimensionally along spectrums rather than as distinct categories [11, 12]. For example, the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) model conceptualizes psychopathology as dimensional and consisting of higher (e.g. Subfactors, Spectra, and Superspectra) and lower-level (Symptoms, and Homogeneous Symptom Components and Maladaptive Traits) domains that capture the more shared or unique characteristics of psychopathology [12].
Defining mechanisms that actively contribute to the emergence and persistence of the diverse array of psychopathology in cancer survivors has significant implications for improvements to psychopathology risk identification, mitigation, and treatment approaches. So far, hypothesized contributing factors in cancer survivorship have been primarily focused on factors including fear of cancer recurrence or progression, financial toxicity, and guilt [13, 14]. While establishing plausible etiological mechanisms that account for the broader spectrum of psychopathology encountered by cancer survivors has been challenging, our article argues for the consideration of cognitive deficits as a particular etiological feature of psychopathology.
Cognitive deficits as an etiological feature of psychopathology
The NIMH Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework is an epistemic framework that breaks down mental health complexity into six overarching domains: positive valence systems, negative valence systems, cognitive systems, systems for social process, arousal/modulatory systems, and sensorimotor systems [15]. These domains can reflect themselves in genes, molecules, cells, circuits, physiology, behaviour, self-report, and/or paradigms. Considering the high levels of distress in patients with cancer, the potential for chronic stress persisting into survivorship, and the effects of treatments, one may postulate an enhancement and interinfluence of higher-level domains of psychopathology.
Cognitive functioning is thus one domain that may functionally contribute to the development and perpetuation of a wide range of psychopathology for cancer survivors. Within the non-oncology literature, there is robust support from psychological, cognitive, neurological, immunological, and genetic theories, along with empirical evidence, that consistently underpins the proposition that cognitive deficits play a substantial role in the development and perpetuation of transdiagnostic psychopathology see [11, 16]. This is thought to occur through two pathways: Pathway 1; individuals with cognitive deficits may face some challenges in confronting, interpreting, and reinterpreting negative or irrelevant thoughts, events, and perceptual stimuli in daily life [11, 17]. Pathway 2; individuals with cognitive deficits may be more susceptible to negative life events across educational, occupational, and social domains due to their cognitive challenges, indirectly contributing to the development and perpetuation of psychopathology [11, 17]. The emerging evidence suggests that multiple cognitive functions may interact and functionally contribute toward psychopathology [18, 19]; however, deficits in speed of information processing may be especially functionally related to mental health challenges [11, 20,21,22,23]. Across both adult and youth samples, speed of information processing has been found to account for unique variance in transdiagnostic psychopathology over and above that accounted for by general cognitive functioning [21, 24].
Cancer-related cognitive impairment and psychopathology
Up to 75% of cancer survivors report experiencing cognitive impairment, known as cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI). These impairments affect diverse cognitive domains, including memory, reasoning, decision-making, speed of processing, and concentration [25, 26]. The onset of these impairments can occur during cancer development, or become noticeable during the treatment or the post-treatment phase, and can last up to 20 years post-treatment and following cancer elimination [26,27,28]. Various psychosocial and biological accounts exist regarding the development of CRCI, and a range of supportive and treatment options have been, and continue to be, developed. However, ultimately CRCI has been shown to have significant effects on an individual’s daily life, relationships, occupational functioning, and social functioning [27, 28].
Although a potential functional association between CRCI and psychosocial distress, as well as mood disorder symptoms, has been recognized, particularly in the development of CRCI, there has been limited acknowledgement of the broader potential etiological contribution that CRCI may make to the development and maintenance of the extensive range of psychopathology commonly observed in cancer survivors. Predominantly, existing literature on CRCI and psychopathology centers on two key areas: (1) the potential functional role that psychological distress, depression, and anxiety may play in the development of CRCI, and (2) the consequences of CRCI on quality of life and psychosocial distress. These explanatory mechanisms of action are fundamental to the development and provision of optimal prevention, treatment and supportive care approaches. However, we call for the increased acknowledgement and a concerted research effort into the potential bidirectional and transdiagnostic functional processes and association between CRCI and psychopathology in cancer survivors. In Fig. 1, we provide a high-level graphical depiction of our proposed functional associations between cancer (including the encompassing of the related established psychosocial stressors), cancer treatments, and psychopathology over the cancer continuum. Our proposition is not that CRCI singularly, or primarily, determines the development and perpetuation of psychopathology in cancer survivors. Instead, we suggest that CRCI may be one among several key factors that interact, contributing to the development and persistence of mental ill-health. A greater understanding of the potential functional association between CRCI and psychopathology and its intersectionality with other common systems has implications for risk identification, prevention, treatment, and supportive care approaches. For example, knowing the main pathways at play in cognitive processes (e.g. selective attention, memory, and repetitive negative thinking), and how they intersect with negative valence systems (e.g. exposure to threatening stimuli), social processes (e.g. affiliation and attachment), and arousal and regulatory systems (e.g. circadian rhythm) could lead to targeted early personalized approaches aimed at circumventing or attenuating risk for psychopathology.
The model is purposefully developed without an explicit time course to reflect that CRCI may develop at any point across the cancer trajectory [29]. This model therefore facilitates the proposition that CRCI may functionally contribute toward the development of psychopathology, and psychopathology may functionally contribute toward the development of CRCI, at any point in the cancer trajectory. Reflecting this proposition, assessment of cognition and mental health in cancer survivors should be ongoing, from initial diagnosis onward.
Conclusion and research directions
Drawing upon non-oncology theoretical and empirical evidence concerning the functional association between cognition and psychopathology, we posit that individuals experiencing CRCI are likely at an elevated risk for the development and persistence of a broad spectrum of psychopathology. We call for future research to examine bidirectional functional relationships between psychopathology and CRCI, calling upon such frameworks such the RDoC. Further, in accordance with contemporary conceptualisations of psychopathology [21], specifically the HiTOP model [12], these examinations should include hierarchical dimensional approaches to assessing psychopathology. This includes the consideration of higher and lower-level domains, moving beyond a sole reliance on a traditional diagnostic approach. To develop the body of literature in this area approaches used can include more practical cross-sectional research, but also importantly longitudinal research using existing national and international datasets, as well as methods such as ecological momentary assessment, and mobile assessments. Experimental data may also be used to further strengthen our understanding. An additional area of consideration is the objective versus subjective assessment of cognition within cancer survivors. As there is not a strong relationship between subjective and objective assessments of cognition [29, 30], it is possible that these proposed relationships between cognition and psychopathology might be established using one assessment approach, but not the other. While cross-sectional research suggests that both objective and subjective measures of cognition show significant relationships with mental health in cancer survivors [28, 29], future research should use both subjective and objective measures when testing this proposed model, as this may inform future risk identification methodologies. Should a functional bidirectional relationship be established, it is imperative to develop an understanding of the specific domains and levels within cognition and psychopathology that are implicated, as well as how the cognitive processes intersect with other transdiagnostic domains. For example, while within non-cancer populations speed of processing seems especially related to transdiagnostic psychopathology across levels of analysis [11], whether this phenomenon is reflected within cancer survivors is unknown. Furthermore, an understanding of the associated time course is crucial. Subsequently, this knowledge can be used to inform risk identification, prevention, treatment, and supportive care approaches. Finally, these theoretical associations may underscore the imperative of the assessment of CRCI-related needs and the provision of optimal supportive care, which may reduce the risk of psychopathology development and persistence in cancer survivors [27, 28].
Data availability
Not applicable.
Code availability
Not Applicable.
References
Chang WH, Lai AG (2022) Cumulative burden of psychiatric disorders and self-harm across 26 adult cancers. Nat Med 28(4):860–870
Abbey G et al (2015) A meta-analysis of prevalence rates and moderating factors for cancer-related post-traumatic stress disorder. Psychooncology 24(4):371–381
Rakusin D, O’Brien K, Murphy M (2021) Case reports of new-onset eating disorders in older adult cancer survivors. J Eat Disord 9(1):166
Hsu T-W et al (2023) Risk of major psychiatric disorders among children and adolescents surviving malignancies: A nationwide longitudinal study. J Clin Oncol 41(11):2054–2066
Kim H, Kim K, Kim YH (2022) Associations between mental illness and cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 26(14)
Dausch BM et al (2004) Rates and correlates of DSM-IV diagnoses in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 11:159–169
Lloyd S et al (2019) Mental health disorders are more common in colorectal cancer survivors and associated with decreased overall survival. Am J Clin Oncol 42(4):355–362
Maass SWMC et al (2015) The prevalence of long-term symptoms of depression and anxiety after breast cancer treatment: a systematic review. Maturitas 82(1):100–108
Haywood D et al (2024) Reconceptualizing Mental Health in Cancer Survivorship. Trends in Cancer
Haywood D et al (2024) Is it time to discard the diagnostic and Statistical Manual of mental disorders (DSM) in psycho-oncology? Cancer Lett 216818–216818
Haywood D et al (2021) Psychopathology and Neurocognition in the Era of the p-Factor: The Current Landscape and the Road Forward. Psychiatry Int 2(3):233–249
Kotov R et al (2021) The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A Quantitative Nosology Based on Consensus of Evidence. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 17
Chan RJ et al (2019) Relationships between financial toxicity and symptom burden in cancer survivors: a systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manage 57(3):646–660
Hall DL et al (2019) Fear of cancer recurrence: a model examination of physical symptoms, emotional distress, and health behavior change. J Oncol Practice 15(9):e787–e797
Cuthbert BN (2022) Research domain criteria (RDoC): progress and potential. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 31(2):107–114
Romer AL, Pizzagalli DA (2021) Is executive dysfunction a risk marker or consequence of psychopathology? A test of executive function as a prospective predictor and outcome of general psychopathology in the adolescent brain cognitive development study®. Dev Cogn Neurosci 51:100994
Beck AT, Rector NA (2005) Cognitive approaches to schizophrenia: theory and therapy. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 1:577–606
Haywood D et al (2022) Neurocognitive Artificial Neural Network Models Are Superior to Linear Models at Accounting for Dimensional Psychopathology. Brain Sci 12(8):1060
Haywood D, Baughman FD (2021) Multidimensionality in Executive Function Profiles in Schizophrenia: A Computational Approach Using the Wisconsin Card Sorting Task. Comput Brain Behav 1–14
John AP, Mya T, Haywood D (2024) Cognitive deficits among people with schizophrenia and prediabetes or diabetes. Acta Psychiatr Scand 149(1):65–76
Haywood D et al (2022) What Accounts for the Factors of Psychopathology? an Investigation of the Neurocognitive Correlates of Internalising, Externalising, and the P-factor. Brain Sci 12(4):421
Haywood D et al (2021) Going “Up” to Move Forward: S-1 Bifactor Models and the Study of Neurocognitive Abilities in Psychopathology. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(14):7413
Haywood D et al (2021) One p-Factor for All? Exploring the Applicability of Structural Models of Psychopathology within Subgroups of a Population. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(13):7108
Kramer E et al (2023) Processing speed is related to the general psychopathology factor in youth. Res Child Adolescent Psychopathol 51(8):1179–1193
Small BJ, Jim HSL (2020) Understanding the time course of cancer-associated cognitive decline: does impairment precede diagnosis? Oxford University Press. p. 431–432
van der Willik KD et al (2018) Inflammation markers and cognitive performance in breast cancer survivors 20 years after completion of chemotherapy: a cohort study. Breast Cancer Res 20(1):1–10
Haywood D et al (2023) Oncology healthcare professionals' perceptions and experiences of'chemobrain'in cancer survivors and persons undergoing cancer treatment. Gen Hosp Psychiatry S0163–8343
Haywood D et al (2023) “Is My Brain Ever Going to Work Fully Again?”: Challenges and Needs of Cancer Survivors with Persistent Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairment. Cancers 15(22):5331
Mayo SJ et al (2021) Cancer-related cognitive impairment in patients with non-central nervous system malignancies: an overview for oncology providers from the MASCC Neurological Complications Study Group. Support Care Cancer 29:2821–2840
Henneghan AM et al (2021) Measuring self-reported cancer-related cognitive impairment: recommendations from the cancer neuroscience initiative working group. J Natl Cancer Inst 113(12)1625–1633
Acknowledgements
NHH is the senior author. NHH holds a position on the editorial board of Supportive Care in Cancer. NHH is Chair of MASCC Fatigue and MASCC Exercise Oncology; DH is a MASCC Cognition Fellowship Recipient. NHH is a MASCC Terry Langbaum Survivorship Fellow.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions No funding was received for the completion of this work. NHH receives salary support from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) as an Investigator Fellow (APP2018070). SLR is supported by an NHMRC Senior Research Fellowship (GNT1154651). SLR is supported by an NHMRC Senior Research Fellowship (GNT1154651). AMH is supported by the National Institutes of Health (1R21NR020497).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the manuscript’s conception and design. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Darren Haywood and Evan Dauer, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
NHH holds a position on the editorial board of Supportive Care in Cancer. NHH is Chair of MASCC Fatigue and MASCC Exercise Oncology; DH is a MASCC Cognition Fellow. NHH is a MASCC Terry Langbaum Survivorship Fellow. DH is a member of the HiTOP Consortium.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Haywood, D., Henry, M., Dauer, E. et al. Cancer-related cognitive impairment as a key contributor to psychopathology in cancer survivors: implications for prevention, treatment and supportive care. Support Care Cancer 32, 480 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-08696-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-08696-9