Abstract
Purpose
Survivors of pediatric cancer are prone to late effects which require ongoing medical care. Young adult survivors often transition from specialist pediatric care to adult-oriented or community-based healthcare. This study aims to describe the attitudes and experiences of survivors and their parents towards transition barriers and enablers.
Methods
Long-term survivors and parents (of survivors < 16 years) were recruited from 11 hospitals in Australia and New Zealand to participate in a semi-structured telephone interview regarding their transition experiences. Transcribed interviews were coded and content analysis was used to number participants within themes.
Results
Thirty-three participants were interviewed, of which 18 were survivors (mean age 26 years, SD = 6.3; mean time since treatment completion 13.3 years, SD = 6.1) and 15 were parents (mean survivor age 15 years, SD = 1.9; mean time since treatment completion 8.4 years, SD = 2.8). Participants described their transition attitudes as positive (55%), neutral (15%), or negative (30%). Key barriers to transition included dependence on pediatric healthcare providers, less confidence in primary care physicians (PCPs), inadequate communication, and cognitive difficulty. Enablers included confidence in and proximity to physicians, good communication, information, independence, and age.
Conclusions
Many survivors face barriers to their transition out of pediatric care. Early introduction to transition, greater collaboration between healthcare professionals, and better information provision to survivors may improve the transition process. Future research of survivors’ experience of barriers/enablers to transition is needed. Development of interventions, such as those that address self-management skills, is required to facilitate transition and encourage long-term engagement.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
With survival rates for many common childhood cancer diagnoses exceeding 80%, it is estimated that one in every 750 individuals in the USA is a childhood cancer survivor [1]. However, survivors are at risk of developing late-effects, adverse long-term health outcomes after treatment [2]. One study placed the cumulative prevalence of late effects by the age of 35 years at 93.5% for survivors [3], including adverse organ health (e.g., cardiomyopathy), psychosocial sequelae (e.g., mental health and cognitive difficulties), and increased risk of recurrent primary or secondary malignancy [1, 2, 4].
Late effects increase survivors’ risk of early mortality and morbidity compared to the general population [5]. Consequently, this vulnerable population requires ongoing anticipatory surveillance and active management through long-term follow-up (LTFU) [6, 7]. Models of LTFU recommend stratifying survivor care by risk of developing late effects, based on a survivor’s diagnosis, treatment(s) received and other risk factors [8]. Low-risk survivors may be managed by primary care physicians (PCPs) [9, 10]. Moderate-risk survivors are recommended to receive shared follow-up care (i.e., between PCPs and oncology teams), whilst high-risk survivors are primarily managed by their oncology team, with regular PCP interaction [9, 10].
Moving from pediatric to adult services is commonly referred to as “transition.” During transition, care shifts from family-centered pediatric to independent patient-centered healthcare as survivors enter adulthood [6]. Transition to adult or community-based care ideally entails an early and sustained collaborative effort between survivors, their physicians, and the healthcare system [7, 11]. The goals of best practice transition are to (1) provide survivors with versatile and developmentally appropriate education regarding their cancer(s), late effects, and required surveillance [6]; (2) increase survivors’ understanding of potential lifestyle changes [6]; and (3) initiate an ongoing relationship between survivors and their follow-up care to encourage lifelong engagement [6]. Ultimately, this helps survivors independently manage their ongoing healthcare needs [12, 13].
There are, however, many barriers to transition which can cause some survivors to become disengaged from follow-up [14]. Up to 75% of survivors have reported not receiving the recommended survivorship-focused care [15,16,17,18,19]. Healthcare system barriers include insufficient medical insurance, inadequate PCP training regarding transition, inaccessibility of care due to distance [7, 12], and in Australia and New Zealand (ANZ) particularly, varying transition practices and pathways [20]. Physician-level barriers include pediatric oncologist reluctance to transition long-term patients into adult care because of their long-standing relationship with them [7], or PCPs poor awareness of LTFU guidelines and risk-based screening [7, 21]. Healthcare professionals (HCPs) also highlight lack of collaboration between HCPs, and unstable social context as potential barriers to transition [21,22,23]. A survivor’s over-reliance on their oncologist and family, or fear of previous relationships with PCPs, can be a barrier at the survivor level [7, 24], as well as limited knowledge of future health risks and poor self-management skills [13, 25, 26]. Cognitive late effects from cancer or its treatment may also impede transition [7, 12]. Impaired cognition increases a survivor’s dependency on their family and physician, hindering successful transition [4, 7, 27], as does younger age [13].
Survivors and parents identify enablers to transition including insurance availability, counselling, providers knowledgeable in survivor care, flexible scheduling with a single identified coordinator, and comprehensive care and access to subspecialists [28,29,30]. Stakeholders recommend transition readiness be assessed in the context of a survivor’s illness experience, rather than by indicators such as age [31]. However, there has been limited exploration of transition experiences from survivor and parent perspectives, across countries and health contexts [31]. Therefore, this study aims to describe the barriers and attitudes towards transition from the perspective of survivors and their families when transitioning out of pediatric services and into adult healthcare across ANZ.
Methods
Participants
We selected eligible survivors and their families using electronic medical records of all 11 pediatric ANZ hospitals as part of the ongoing Australia and New Zealand Children’s Hematology/Oncology Group (ANZCHOG) Survivorship Study [19]. We mailed questionnaires to potential eligible participants, including an option to participate in a semi-structured telephone interview conducted by a trained researcher. We invited survivors over 16 years of age to participate. For survivors under 16 years of age, we invited their parents/guardian to complete a parent-modified version of the questionnaire/interview. Eligible survivors included those who (1) were diagnosed with some form of cancer before the age of 16 years and at least 5 years prior to participation in this study, (2) had completed active cancer treatment at a participating hospital, (3) were fluent in English, and (4) were alive and in remission. No further limits were placed to capture a broad range of perspectives/experiences. Ethics approval was obtained from all participating hospitals, and informed consent was obtained from all participants before proceeding with the study.
Data collection
Participants self-reported demographic and clinical details in the questionnaire, which included diagnosis, treatment received, time since treatment, and whether they had experienced memory or learning difficulties since completing their treatment. The interview included questions about whether they had visited their PCP for cancer-specific care since completing treatment, who they perceived to be the person primarily responsible for their care, and questions regarding their transition or future transition (Table 1). We conducted interviews March–October 2016.
Data analysis
We conducted descriptive statistics using SPSS software version 23.0 to analyze the demographic information obtained from the questionnaire. For the interview data, we chose qualitative analysis to promote an understanding of the meaning of survivors’ experiences [32]. Interviews were transcribed verbatim. Three researchers (BN, JF, CS) reviewed participant responses from interviews for commonly arising themes and categories, resulting in a descriptive coding scheme informed by research aims [32, 33]. Interviews were initially coded line by line using NVivo 11 by one researcher (BN). Two researchers (JF, CS) then independently coded 10% of the final sample (n = 33) to ensure the reliability of initial coding (95% agreement). Disagreements were resolved through discussion. Categories of responses were then analyzed and interpreted, resulting in over-arching themes. Transition status was determined by self-reported responses. Survivors’ transition attitudes were classified as either positive, neutral, or negative according to the overall perspective of the survivor expressed during the interview. Final coding was double checked by another researcher (JF) on 20% of the final sample, with 86% (1 disagreement out of 7) agreement on categorization of transition attitudes. We used content analysis to identify the number of participant responses to a particular theme [32]. As interviews were semi-structured, not all participants responded to every theme. The proportion of participants who responded to each question is reported as n/33 and variations noted in cases where all participants did not respond.
Results
Of survey respondents (n = 485; response rate 59%) [19], 83 survivors/parents opted in for interviews. We purposely sampled 33 participants to discuss their transition, the results of which are presented here. Adult survivors (n = 18) were on average 26 years old (SD = 6.3), and parents (n = 15) reported on their children who were on average 15 years old (SD = 1.9; Table 2). Survivors were commonly diagnosed with ALL (13/33, 39%) and were interviewed 13.3 years after treatment completion (SD = 6.1). Survivors whose parents were interviewed had completed treatment on average 8.4 years ago (SD = 2.8). Many participants described their overall transition attitude as positive (18/33, 55%), with under one third of participants reporting overall negative transition attitudes (10/33, 30%). Participants who reported that they had transitioned (15/33, 45%) described it as an overall positive experience as they had greater independence, were with other patients their age, and were able to access medical care closer to home. Identified barriers (dependence on oncology, cognitive difficulties, inadequate communication, and low PCP rapport) and enablers (independence, information, older age, communication, and PCP confidence) appeared to shape participant’s transition attitudes.
Enablers to transition
Independence
Participants expressed positive transition attitudes when discussing how independence, in the form of self-management skills, could combat attachment to previous HCPs (7/33, 21%). Some participants interpreted self-management skills as being beneficial to the transition process, such that only when the survivor was “ready to go on [their] own…[would they] get transferred to all adult doctors” (female survivor, 20 years). Other participants perceived transitioning as a way of limiting a survivor’s “reliance on doctors” (mother of female survivor, 18 years), which would help develop a survivor’s self-management skills so it was “not [the parents] taking any responsibility for [the survivor’s] care.”
Information
Participants identified that adequate and appropriately delivered information was an enabler of transition (6/33, 18%). Information that enabled transition was seen to provide context “about some of the long-term effects” (female survivor, 22 years) and “the role that [the survivor] needed to play with the PCP.” Participants suggested that this information should be delivered early “if [survivors] had questions at say 16-17 as a teen” (female survivor, 27 years), and through an appropriate medium “like a website or…a booklet.”
Age
Participants identified older age as enabling transition, relating to positive transition attitudes (9/33, 27%). With older age, participants predicted they “might decide [they don’t] want to do [pediatric care] anymore” (parent of female survivor, 18 years), expressing that “adults are a bit different to kids…adult doctors would have a bit of a broader understanding” (female survivor, 36 years). Participants also reported that the younger age of other survivors in clinic enabled transition, as it encouraged them to transition to adult-oriented care. Older survivors who “saw kids that might have been two or three” (female survivor, 19 years) years old felt that they were “not going through the same sorts of things”, which encouraged them to transition and be “with people [their] age group.”
Good communication
Good communication was perceived to enable successful transition (8/33, 24%) and was associated with positive transition attitudes. Participants expressed that if there was effective communication between past and future HCPs, they would not “have to educate or retell [their medical history] every time [they] went in” (female survivor, 36 years). Communication also provided comfort during transition. Whilst some identified communication with parents as a source of information and security, others suggested that a link to their past HCP could give them comfort during the transition process, such as “a phone call…just to say ‘how’s it going? Do you have any questions?’” (mother of male survivor, 15 years).
Confidence in and proximity to physicians
Confidence in physicians was an enabler of transition and related to positive transition attitudes (4/33, 12%). Confidence was fostered by familiarity with new specialists.
“They started talking to me about [transition] since I’ve been eighteen and I was still seeing [my oncologist] when I was twenty…I’ve known my new hematologist oncologist already…it’s not scary like someone new” (female survivor, 23 years). Participants expressed confidence in their PCP when they perceived them as specialized in cancer treatment and understanding of the burden of late effects. These PCPs were described by participants as the central coordinator in their care, setting them “up with the skin specialist and…the physio[therapist]” (mother of male survivor, 12 years). Compared with previous pediatric clinics, participants expressed living in close proximity to PCPs as an enabler of transition (3/33, 9%) as “it meant not having to drive” (male survivor, 20 years).
Barriers to transition
Dependence on pediatric healthcare providers
Dependency on pediatric HCPs was the most commonly reported barrier amongst participants (11/33, 33%). Participants described an attachment to their previous healthcare provider, which appeared to be related to negative transition attitudes. Participants cited two main reasons for this. The first was that “having cancer as a kid [made] you a part of a club” (female survivor, 27 years) where they were treated “like a superstar” (6/11, 55%). Being “transitioned out of that” familiar and nurturing environment gave survivors a sense of loss, as it would “be like…ending something” (female survivor, 27 years). The second reason was the level of understanding past HCPs had about participants (7/11, 64%). This was expressed as “really beneficial, because [the survivor] might not notice a change but [their original HCPs] might” (female survivor, 26 years).
Cognitive difficulty
Twenty-four percent of participants reported experiencing cognitive difficulties (i.e., problems with learning and memory) after cancer treatment (8/33, 24%). Half of participants with cognitive difficulty viewed it as a barrier, reporting negative transition attitudes (4/8, 50%). Cognitive difficulty was expressed as an “intellectual disability” (male survivor, 20 years) that acted as a barrier to transition, keeping the survivor “quite young in a lot of ways.” Participants expressed reservations and suggested making transition “a slow process” (mother of female survivor, 16 years) that would help the survivor “understand what [they] had” because their cognitive impairment made communication difficult. This participant also expressed a lack of confidence in PCPs, stressing the need for them to understand “that late effects are a real thing.” Another participant’s reservation was their over-dependence on pediatric HCPs to provide “a little safety net” (mother of female survivor, 15 years) due to the survivor’s lack of self-management skills. Amongst participants with cognitive difficulties who expressed positive transition attitudes (3/8, 37.5%), only one parent did so without reservation: “I’m happy with her PCP, I’m happy with the system” (mother of female survivor, 16 years).
Inadequate communication
Seven participants (7/33, 21%) identified inadequate communication between themselves and their pediatric and future adult HCPs as a barrier to transition, which contributed to participants’ negative transition attitudes. Inadequate communication between HCPs led to one participant’s PCP only having “the summary letter [given during] transfer…to go by” (male survivor, 20 years). Participants also reported feeling isolated from HCPs due to poor communication, with one participant realizing post-transition “okay, we are actually on our own now” (mother of male survivor, 15 years).
Lack of confidence in primary care physicians
A common barrier to transition was the perception that PCPs did not have sufficient cancer-specific knowledge to provide the level of care that pediatric HCPs could (10/33, 30%). This was associated with negative attitudes towards transitioning to PCPs, with one participant commenting that transition “would be alright if it wasn’t a discharge to the PCP…if it was a transition to an adult hospital that would be fine” (female survivor, 36 years). In these cases, participants relied on either their family to take an “extremely central role in [the survivor’s] care” (female survivor, 27 years), or themselves to be “the only person who really understood [their] medical history” (male survivor, 31 years).
Discussion
Eighteen survivors and 15 parents of survivors participated in interviews regarding their attitudes towards transition. Barriers included dependence on pediatric HCPs, less confidence in PCPs, inadequate communication, and cognitive difficulty. Enablers included confidence in and proximity to physicians, good communication, information, independence, and older age. A participant’s perception of the barriers and enablers of transition appeared to shape their overall attitude towards transition.
A survivor’s ability to independently manage their health appeared related to positive attitudes towards transition in our study. Less independent participants were reluctant to transition, fearing losing the familiarity of past HCPs, consistent with lower transition readiness [12]. Some participants expressed that self-management skills could foster independent control of healthcare and transition readiness, consistent with the literature [12, 13]. Other participants proposed that entering the transition process could itself foster self-management skills, suggesting a mutual relationship may exist, where self-management skills aid transition readiness, and transition experience aids the development of self-management skills.
Participants who received sufficient information about their ongoing healthcare reported more positive attitudes towards transition, yet 76% of parents report unmet information needs [34]. Consistent with other studies, many survivors (80%) and parents (71%) report needing further personalized information [35, 36]. Participants suggested earlier provision of information (e.g., at diagnosis) could overcome unmet information needs, consistent with previous research [35]. Whilst our participants suggested the Internet as an appropriate medium for information dissemination, a Swiss study of 319 survivors found this to be the least popular method [36]. Written information and a personal manner were preferred by Swiss survivors possibly owing to their less dispersed nature and access to specialized care compared with Australians [36].
Age was a survivor-level factor which was reported as influencing transition attitudes. Similar to the views of pediatric oncologists [22], participants used age to gauge their developmental maturity and indicate transition readiness. A participant’s older age signified greater maturity and willingness for specialized adult-focused care, leading to more positive attitudes towards transition. Previous research suggests 87% of survivors over 16 years of age are willing to transition, and 58% of them rate comprehensive adult care as very important to promoting transition readiness [29, 37].
Our results show that cognitive difficulty may be a barrier to transition at the survivor level, reflected in pediatric oncologists’ opinions [22]. Consistent with past research [7, 12, 38], participants suggested that cognitive difficulty hindered the development of self-management skills, which could lead to over-dependence on parents or past physicians. Participants also indicated that cognitive difficulties could limit survivors’ ability to process information relevant to transition, making self-management skills (e.g., remembering/retelling their medical history) difficult [11]. Past research with survivors with cognitive difficulties found common areas of deficit included poor executive function and attention and concentration [39]. Our participants recommended a slower transition process to combat this, where the concept of transition was introduced early and discussed often to facilitate leaving pediatric-focused survivor care.
At the healthcare system level, inadequate communication between HCPs resulted in participants having to repeatedly retell their medical history and depend on past HCPs for support. Sub-optimal communication between past and future HCPs has been shown to impede transition [40]. Participants suggested meetings between those involved in the transition process to combat this, which was echoed in a recent study of LTFU experts [23]. This suggests that a community-based shared-care model, where the PCP coordinates with different sub-specialties, may be an effective solution to the barrier of communication [23, 41]. Review of Survivorship Care Plans to ensure transfer of data and recommendations for future surveillance could overcome some communication issues.
Engaging with PCPs was a barrier to transition when survivors lacked confidence in their ability to provide survivorship care, influencing negative transition attitudes. Suh et al. [21] and Lawrence et al. [42] have shown PCPs exhibit reduced awareness of survivor-related healthcare issues. Interventions such as transitional education of PCPs, early introduction of co-management of survivors by PCPs and oncologists, and web-based information dissemination may foster familiarity and confidence in PCPs [21]. Engaging with PCPs who were located closer to survivors than distant previous HCPs was an enabler of transition, appearing to influence positive transition attitudes. Transportation and time are barriers that commonly burden survivors and their caregivers [43, 44].
A potential limitation of this study was that transition status was determined from participants’ self-report, limiting a valid assessment of the appropriateness of such transition. Although the sample size was small, we reached thematic saturation (assessed alongside data collection) to ensure a broad sample of perspectives achieved by recruiting survivors/parents across ANZ. Our findings may be applicable beyond ANZ, as barriers/enablers identified in our study are modifiable in any context to ensure optimal care. This study’s qualitative approach allowed for a nuanced experiential perspective of an understudied area. However, its cross-sectional design limits causal relationships being drawn from inferred themes. Current interventions target the development of easily modifiable self-management skills before transition [12, 13, 45]. However, further research is required to clarify our finding that entry into transition could promote the development of self-management skills. Future research into the information needs of survivors should determine whether survivors with cognitive difficulties have higher rates of unmet information needs than survivors without cognitive difficulties.
Over a half of participants expressed overall positive attitudes towards transition, whilst under a third reported negative attitudes. Barriers to transition included dependence on pediatric HCPs, low confidence in PCPs, inadequate communication, and cognitive difficulty. Addressing these barriers may improve satisfaction with care and engagement in follow-up. This includes introducing transition earlier to families, encouraging HCP collaboration/communication, and better information provision. Future studies that appreciate the experiential perspective of survivors and their families as they transition from pediatric to adult healthcare are required to fully understand the barriers of transition.
Abbreviations
- LTFU:
-
Long-term follow-up
- PCP:
-
Primary care physician
- HCP:
-
Healthcare professionals
- ANZ:
-
Australia and New Zealand
- CNS:
-
Central nervous system
- ALL:
-
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia
References
Robison LL, Hudson MM (2014) Survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer: life-long risks and responsibilities. Nat Rev Cancer 14(1):61–70. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3634
Mulhern RK, Merchant TE, Gajjar A, Reddick WE, Kun LE (2004) Late neurocognitive sequelae in survivors of brain tumours in childhood. Lancet Oncol 5(7):399–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(04)01507-4
Hudson MM, Ness KK, Gurney JG, Mulrooney DA, Chemaitilly W, Krull KR, Green DM, Armstrong GT, Nottage KA, Jones KE, Sklar CA, Srivastava DK, Robison LL (2013) Clinical ascertainment of health outcomes among adults treated for childhood cancer. JAMA 309(22):2371–2381. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.6296
Urbach SL, Guger S, Nathan PC (2012) Long-term survivors of cancer in childhood and adolescence. Curr Pediatr Rev 8(2):166–178. https://doi.org/10.2174/157339612800681271
Mertens AC, Liu Q, Neglia JP, Wasilewski K, Leisenring W, Armstrong GT, Robison LL, Yasui Y (2008) Cause-specific late mortality among 5-year survivors of childhood cancer: the childhood cancer survivor study. J Natl Cancer Inst 100(19):1368–1379. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djn310
Freyer DR (2010) Transition of care for young adult survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer: rationale and approaches. J Clin Oncol 28(32):4810–4818. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.4278
Henderson TO, Friedman DL, Meadows AT (2010) Childhood cancer survivors: transition to adult-focused risk-based care. Pediatrics 126(1):129–136. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-2802
Wallace WH, Blacklay A, Eiser C, Davies H, Hawkins M, Levitt GA, Jenney ME, Late Effects Committee of the United Kingdom Children’s Cancer Study Group (UKCCSG) (2001) Developing strategies for long term follow up of survivors of childhood cancer. BMJ 323(7307):271–274. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7307.271
McCabe MS, Partridge AH, Grunfeld E, Hudson MM (2013) Risk-based health care, the cancer survivor, the oncologist and the primary care physician. Semin Oncol 40(6):804–812. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.seminoncol.2013.09.004
Oeffinger KC, McCabe MS (2006) Models for delivering survivorship care. J Clin Oncol 24(32):5117–5124. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2006.07.0474
Klassen AF, Rosenberg-Yunger ZRS, D’Agostino NM, Cano SJ, Barr R, Syed I, Granek L, Greenberg ML, Dix D, Nathan PC (2015) The development of scales to measure childhood cancer survivors’ readiness for transition to long-term follow-up care as adults. Health Expect 18(6):1941–1955. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12241
Schwartz LA et al (2011) A social-ecological model of readiness for transition to adult-oriented care for adolescents and young adults with chronic health conditions. Child Care Health Dev 37(6):883–895
Syed IA, Nathan PC, Barr R, Rosenberg-Yunger ZRS, D’Agostino NM, Klassen AF (2016) Examining factors associated with self-management skills in teenage survivors of cancer. J Cancer Surviv 10(4):686–691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-016-0514-y
Nathan PC, Greenberg ML, Ness KK, Hudson MM, Mertens AC, Mahoney MC, Gurney JG, Donaldson SS, Leisenring WM, Robison LL, Oeffinger KC (2008) Medical care in long-term survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the childhood cancer survivor study. J Clin Oncol 26(27):4401–4409. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.16.9607
Lupatsch JE, Wengenroth L, Rueegg CS, Teuffel O, Gumy-Pause F, Kuehni CE, Michel G, for the Swiss Paediatric Oncology Group (SPOG) (2016) Follow-up care of adolescent survivors of childhood cancer: the role of health beliefs. Pediatr Blood Cancer 63(2):318–325. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.25755
Miller KA et al (2016) Supporting long-term follow-up of young adult survivors of childhood cancer: correlates of healthcare self-efficacy. Pediatr Blood Cancer 64(2):358–363
Nathan PC, Agha M, Pole JD, Hodgson D, Guttmann A, Sutradhar R, Greenberg ML (2016) Predictors of attendance at specialized survivor clinics in a population-based cohort of adult survivors of childhood cancer. J Cancer Surviv 10(4):611–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-016-0522-y
Signorelli C, McLoone JK, Wakefield CE, Cohn RJ (2015) Dental hygiene in childhood cancer survivors: the importance of tertiary long term follow-up care. Pediatr Blood Cancer 62(5):921. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.25421
Vetsch J et al (2016) “Forewarned and forearmed”: long-term childhood cancer survivors’ and parents’ information needs and implications for survivorship models of care. Patient Educ Couns 100(2):355–363
Signorelli C, Wakefield CE, McLoone JK, Fardell JE, Lawrence RA, Osborn M, Truscott J, Tapp H, Cohn RJ, the ANZCHOG Survivorship Study Group (2017) Models of childhood cancer survivorship care in Australia and New Zealand: strengths and challenges. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 13(6):407–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.12700
Suh E, Daugherty CK, Wroblewski K, Lee H, Kigin ML, Rasinski KA, Ford JS, Tonorezos ES, Nathan PC, Oeffinger KC, Henderson TO (2014) General internists’ preferences and knowledge about the care of adult survivors of childhood cancer: a cross-sectional survey. Ann Intern Med 160(1):11–17. https://doi.org/10.7326/M13-1941
Kenney LB et al (2016) Transition and transfer of childhood cancer survivors to adult care: a national survey of pediatric oncologists. Pediatr Blood Cancer 64(2):346–352
Mouw MS et al (2016) Care transitions in childhood cancer survivorship: providers’ perspectives. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 6(1):111–119
Cheung WY, Neville BA, Cameron DB, Cook EF, Earle CC (2009) Comparisons of patient and physician expectations for cancer survivorship care. J Clin Oncol 27(15):2489–2495. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.3232
Kadan-Lottick NS, Robison LL, Gurney JG, Neglia JP, Yasui Y, Hayashi R, Hudson M, Greenberg M, Mertens AC (2002) Childhood cancer survivors’ knowledge about their past diagnosis and treatment: Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. JAMA 287(14):1832–1839. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.14.1832
Wilkins KL, D’Agostino N, Penney AM, Barr RD, Nathan PC (2014) Supporting adolescents and young adults with cancer through transitions: position statement from the Canadian Task Force on Adolescents and Young Adults with cancer. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 36(7):545–551. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPH.0000000000000103
Rey-Casserly C, Meadows ME (2008) Developmental perspectives on optimizing educational and vocational outcomes in child and adult survivors of cancer. Dev Disabil Res Rev 14(3):243–250. https://doi.org/10.1002/ddrr.31
DiNofia A et al (2017) Parent-perceived facilitators in the transition of care for young adult survivors of childhood cancer. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 39(7):e377–e380
Sadak KT, Dinofia A, Reaman G (2013) Patient-perceived facilitators in the transition of care for young adult survivors of childhood cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer 60(8):1365–1368. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.24494
Quillen J, Bradley H, Calamaro C (2017) Identifying barriers among childhood cancer survivors transitioning to adult health care. J Ped Onc Nurs 34(1): 20–27
McCann L, Kearney N, Wengstrom Y (2014) “It’s just going to a new hospital ... that’s it.” Or is it? An experiential perspective on moving from pediatric to adult cancer services. Cancer Nurs 37(5):E23–E31. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0b013e3182a40f99
Miles MB, Huberman AM (1984) Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods. SAGE publications Inc, California
Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3(2):77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Vetsch J, Rueegg CS, Gianinazzi ME, Bergsträsser E, von der Weid NX, Michel G, for the Swiss Paediatric Oncology Group (SPOG) (2015) Information needs in parents of long-term childhood cancer survivors. Pediatr Blood Cancer 62(5):859–866. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.25418
Boyajian RN et al (2014) Desired elements and timing of cancer survivorship care: one approach may not fit all. J Oncol Pract 10(5):e293–e298
Gianinazzi ME, Essig S, Rueegg CS, von der Weid NX, Brazzola P, Kuehni CE, Michel G, for the Swiss Paediatric Oncology Group (SPOG) (2014) Information provision and information needs in adult survivors of childhood cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer 61(2):312–318. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.24762
Fardell JE, Wakefield CE, Signorelli C, Hill, R, Skeen J, Maguire AM, Cohn RJ (2017) Transition of childhood cancer survivors to adult care: the survivor perspective. Pediatr Blood Cancer 64(6)
Schwartz LA, Daniel LC, Brumley LD, Barakat LP, Wesley KM, Tuchman LK (2014) Measures of readiness to transition to adult health care for youth with chronic physical health conditions: a systematic review and recommendations for measurement testing and development. J Pediatr Psychol 39(6):588–601. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsu028
Ki Moore IM, Hockenberry MJ, Krull KR (2013) Cancer-related cognitive changes in children, adolescents and adult survivors of childhood cancers. Semin Oncol Nurs 29(4):248–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2013.08.005
Hewitt, M.G. S.; Stovall, E. (2006) From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. Institute of Medicine and National Research Council (2006) From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor: Lost in Transition. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/11468
Oeffinger KC, Mertens AC, Sklar CA, Kawashima T, Hudson MM, Meadows AT, Friedman DL, Marina N, Hobbie W, Kadan-Lottick NS, Schwartz CL, Leisenring W, Robison LL, Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (2006) Chronic health conditions in adult survivors of childhood cancer. N Engl J Med 355(15):1572–1582. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa060185
Lawrence RA, McLoone JK, Wakefield CE, Cohn RJ (2016) Primary care physicians’ perspectives of their role in cancer care: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med 31(10):1222–1236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-016-3746-7
Berg CJ, Stratton E, Esiashvili N, Mertens A (2016) Young adult cancer survivors’ experience with cancer treatment and follow-up care and perceptions of barriers to engaging in recommended care. J Cancer Educ 31(3):430–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-015-0853-9
Fluchel MN, Kirchhoff AC, Bodson J, Sweeney C, Edwards SL, Ding Q, Stoddard GJ, Kinney AY (2014) Geography and the burden of care in pediatric cancers. Pediatr Blood Cancer 61(11):1918–1924. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.25170
McCorkle R, Ercolano E, Lazenby M, Schulman-Green D, Schilling LS, Lorig K, Wagner EH (2011) Self-management: enabling and empowering patients living with cancer as a chronic illness. CA Cancer J Clin 61(1):50–62. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.20093
Acknowledgements
ANZCHOG Survivorship Study Group: The members of the ANZCHOG Survivorship Study Group in alphabetical order: Dr. Frank Alvaro, Prof Richard Cohn, Dr. Rob Corbett, Dr. Peter Downie, Ms Karen Egan, Prof Jon Emery, Ms Sarah Ellis, Prof Jon Emery, Dr Joanna Fardell, Ms Tali Foreman, Dr Melissa Gabriel, Prof Afaf Girgis, Ms Kerrie Graham, Ms Karen Johnston, Dr Janelle Jones, Dr Liane Lockwood, Dr Ann Maguire, Dr Maria McCarthy, Dr Jordana McLoone, Ms Sinead Molloy, Dr Michael Osborn, Ms Christina Signorelli, Dr Jane Skeen, Dr Heather Tapp, Ms Tracy Till, Ms Jo Truscott, Ms Kate Turpin, Prof Claire Wakefield, Dr Thomas Walwyn, and Ms Kathy Yallop.
Funding
This project received financial support from The Kids Cancer Alliance. The Behavioral Sciences Unit is proudly supported by the Kids with Cancer Foundation. Joanna Fardell and Christina Signorelli are supported by The Kids’ Cancer Project. Claire Wakefield is supported by a Career Development Fellowship from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (APP1067501). The BSU’s survivorship research program is funded by The Kids’ Cancer Project and a Cancer Council NSW Program Grant PG16-02 with the support of the Estate of the Late Harry McPaul.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval was obtained from all participating hospitals, and informed consent was obtained from all participants before proceeding with the study.
Conflicts of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nandakumar, B.S., Fardell, J.E., Wakefield, C.E. et al. Attitudes and experiences of childhood cancer survivors transitioning from pediatric care to adult care. Support Care Cancer 26, 2743–2750 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4077-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4077-5