Abstract
Purpose
Little is known about how caring for someone affects the caregiver's health behaviours. We explore behaviour changes and their determinants in caregivers of women with ovarian cancer.
Methods
Caregivers of 101 women with ovarian cancer completed a questionnaire 1.5–6 years after their family member's cancer diagnosis, providing information about their current health behaviours, height, weight and changes in these compared with pre-diagnosis. Information about the impact of ovarian cancer, other stressful events and distress was also collected for patients and caregivers. Logistic regression was used to determine characteristics associated with negative changes.
Results
Half (54%) of caregivers did not meet Australian physical activity guidelines, 71% were overweight/obese, 40% ate <2 serves of fruit and 80% <5 serves of vegetables/day, 37% consumed >2 alcoholic drinks/occasion and 10% were smokers. Overall, 56% reported ≥1 negative change since their family member’s diagnosis, with many decreasing their physical activity (42%) and/or gaining weight (35%). Caregivers were more likely to report negative changes if they had only school-level education (OR 3.0, 95%CI 1.1–8.4), they were unable to carry out usual daily activities due to caregiving (OR 2.0, 95%CI 0.7–5.4), they were clinically distressed (OR 3.4, 95%CI 1.1–10.1) or caring for a woman whose disease impacted on her usual daily activities (OR 4.3, 95%CI 1.4–13.2).
Conclusions
Many caregivers of women with ovarian cancer do not meet Australian health guidelines and more than half describe negative changes after becoming a caregiver. More attention should be given to cancer caregivers with high physical and emotional demands.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Behavioural factors such as insufficient physical activity, poor diet, obesity, excessive alcohol consumption and smoking increase an individual’s risk of diabetes, cancer and heart disease [1]. The prevalence of these health risk factors in family caregivers of cancer patients is unknown, however it is hypothesised that cancer caregivers may neglect their own health when they take on this often daunting and burdensome support role. Moreover a caregiver may be grappling with their own intense emotions [2] at the same time as providing support with acute illness episodes, administering treatments, navigating the health care system and in some circumstances providing hands on care with activities of daily living [3]. This role may extend for years and involve a considerable number of hours per week [3]. In the context of cancer, no studies have considered the potential effects of caring for someone else on a caregiver’s own lifestyle behaviour.
Existing research indicates that caring for a family member with chronic disease is associated with significant levels of distress, with some caregivers reporting higher levels of distress than the patients themselves [4–6]. Family caregivers have also been found to have impaired immune function [7], greater incidence of coronary heart disease [8] and, when overburdened, increased cardiovascular reactivity [9] and mortality [10], compared to non-caregiving controls. For these reasons, caregivers have been described as ‘second order patients' [11] and targeted attention to their health needs is becoming a priority for cancer service providers. With an aging population, increasing incidence of cancer, and therefore increasing numbers of family caregivers, the indirect impact on caregivers health while providing care for patients, needs to be considered.
Existing health behaviour research has focused on elderly caregivers in general [12] or caregivers of a family member with functional [13] or cognitive impairment [14]. Results show that compared to matched non-caregivers, these caregiving subgroups are less likely to engage in regular physical activity [13, 14] but no more likely to have worse nutrition [14] smoke, drink excessively or be overweight [12]. However, it is important to recognise that the level of caregiving and opportunity for self-care behaviours is likely to differ depending on the diagnosis, treatment, symptoms and prognosis of the person being cared for, and that it is important to consider the caregiver’s health behaviours in relation to specific caregiving roles.
Caregivers of women with ovarian cancer may have a particularly difficult and prolonged support role to play. Most women with ovarian cancer are diagnosed with late stage disease and are typically treated initially with surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. Approximately 80% of ovarian cancer patients experience disease recurrence [15] and receive multiple lines of chemotherapy over several years, before succumbing to their disease. Given the dearth of information about cancer caregivers health behaviours and the importance of maintaining caregivers' health, we used data from a national ovarian cancer study to document absolute levels of, and changes in, health behaviours (including physical activity, fruit, vegetable and alcohol intake, smoking) and body mass after becoming a caregiver of a family member with ovarian cancer. We also looked at the determinants of negative changes.
Methods
Participants and recruitment
Women with invasive ovarian cancer who participated in a case-control known as the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study (AOCS) [16–18] were invited to participate in a quality of life sub-study (AOCS-QoL) and asked to invite their caregiver into the study. The definition of caregiver was deliberately left for the patient to interpret however, when clarity was sought, a caregiver was described as someone who provided the patient with physical or emotional support. Paid caregivers were excluded. Caregivers were contacted separately and mailed the caregiver version of study documents. Participating patients and caregivers completed QoL questionnaires at 3–6 monthly intervals for a period of 2 years, beginning 3–55 months after diagnosis (median 19 months). The staggered recruitment time after diagnosis enabled comprehensive longitudinal assessment of health-related outcomes covering a large range of the disease trajectory within a shorter research study time frame. A self-report lifestyle questionnaire was mailed along with the caregiver QoL questionnaire in late 2007 and the data presented here pertain to this single time-point. The components of these studies were approved by the Human Research Ethics Committees of The University of Sydney, the Queensland Institute of Medical Research and all participating hospital sites.
Predictor variables measured
Socio-demographics: Age, education, and marital status were accessed via AOCS for patients and via QoL questionnaires for caregivers. Relationship to patient was collected via the QoL questionnaire.
Patient disease treatment and symptom burden:
Date of diagnosis and surgical stage (FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) at diagnosis were accessed through AOCS. Current treatment was collected via the patient QoL questionnaire. Symptom burden was assessed by the 12-item additional concerns subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy—Ovarian (FACT-O) [19].
Caregiver and patient psychological distress impact of cancer, other stress:
Both caregiver and patient QoL questionnaires assessed these outcomes. Anxiety and depression were assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) [20]. Two sub-scales distinguish between ‘normal’ (0–7), ‘sub-clinical’ (8–10), and ‘clinical’ (11–21) anxiety and depression. Impact of ovarian cancer was estimated by a single item asking ‘With respect to ovarian cancer, how many days during the last month were you unable to carry out your usual daily activities fully?’. Other stressful life events was assessed by asking ‘Do you have any other problems, e.g. medical conditions or other stressful life events, which you feel have affected your answers?’
Primary outcomes measured
Caregiver health behaviour and body mass variables were collected via the lifestyle questionnaire.
Physical activity:
The Active Australia Survey [21] was used to classify caregivers as sufficiently active (150 min per week using the sum of walking, moderate activity and vigorous activity (weighted by two)), insufficiently active (1–149 min per week), and sedentary (no physical activity), as per the National Physical Activity Guidelines for Australians [22].
Body Mass Index (BMI, kg/m2):
This was derived from self-reported weight and height, and grouped according to guidelines into underweight (BMI < 18.5), normal weight (18.5–24.9), overweight (25.0–29.9), and obese (≥30) [23]. Participants were also provided with a tape measure and asked to measure their waist circumference. As per the guidelines, a waist circumference above 80 cm in women or 94 cm in men was classified as overweight and a waist circumference above 88 cm in women or 102 cm in men was classified as obese [23].
Diet:
Respondents were asked to report how many servings of fruits or vegetables they usually ate each day [24] and categorised as to whether they met the Australian recommendations of two servings of fruit or five servings of vegetables per day [25].
Smoking:
Caregivers were asked if they were currently smoking, had given up smoking and, if so, when, or had smoked less than 100 cigarettes in their life.
Alcohol intake:
Alcohol items were first prefaced with a definition of a standard drink of beer, wine, port/sherry and spirits, as per the Australian Guidelines [26]. Caregivers were then asked a) if they drank alcohol in the past 12 months and b) how many standard drinks they usually had on a day when they drank. They were then categorised into whether they met the guideline for reducing the risk of alcohol-related harm over a lifetime (i.e. usually had ≤2 standard drinks per occasion) [26].
Behaviour changes:
Caregivers were also asked if their current level of each behaviour/weight was more than, less than, or the same as just before their family member’s ovarian cancer diagnosis.
Statistical methods
Caregivers were classified as having at least one negative change over the pre- to post-cancer period if they reported decreasing physical activity or fruit or vegetable intake, increasing their smoking or drinking to above recommended limits, or gaining/losing weight to remain or become outside the healthy BMI range. We used stepwise logistic regression models to determine the characteristics associated with having at least one negative change in behaviour. We grouped predictor variables into three blocks reflecting the biopsychosocial conceptual model: Block 1 caregiver’s core demographic characteristics; Block 2 caregiver's personal characteristics at the time of the lifestyle questionnaire and; Block 3 patient's characteristics. Using forward selection, we entered the blocks one by one and, with the exception of age and years of caregiving, excluded non-significant variables from subsequent block entries to limit over-specification of the model. Multicollinearity checks of suspected highly correlated independent variables were performed before modeling. As gender and relationship to patient were multicollinear we ran two separate block 1 models, one with each of these variables.
While conventional p values are reported, due to our small sample size we focused on meaningful group differences, (odds ratios above 1.8 or below 0.56) for evaluating the significance of independent variables worthy of future study. Where final adjusted point estimates did not differ appreciable from unadjusted point estimates we report unadjusted point estimates and their 95% confidence intervals.
Results
Participants
Seven-hundred and 98 (66%) eligible AOCS patients and 373 caregivers (88% of those nominated) participated in the QoL study. One-hundred and 24 caregivers were still participating in the QoL study by the time the lifestyle questionnaire was sent and, of these, 101 completed the lifestyle questionnaire.
Caregivers who completed the lifestyle questionnaire had a mean age of 58 years (range 22–84) and 75% were male, 72% were spouses and approximately half (56%) were college or university educated (Table 1). The patients they were caring for had a mean age of 59 years (range 26–78), were diagnosed on average 3.2 years earlier (range 1.5–6.0) with advanced stage disease (72%) and 21% were currently undergoing chemotherapy treatment. At the time of the lifestyle questionnaire, over one-fifth of caregivers (22%) reported being unable to fully carry out their usual daily activities on one or more days over the past month due to their caregiving role and 22% had clinical levels of anxiety and/or depression.
Prevalence of health behaviours, and body mass index
Compared to Australian guidelines, we found that 54% of ovarian cancer caregivers reported not meeting the physical activity recommendation for adults, 40% reported consuming less than adequate servings of fruit, 80% reported consuming less than adequate servings of vegetables and 37% reported usually drinking alcohol above the recommended level (≤2 standard drinks/day) for reduced lifetime risk of alcohol-related harm (Table 2). Furthermore, 71% of caregivers were overweight or obese under the BMI (kg/m2) classification, 66% had an increased waist circumference and 10% were current smokers. Older caregivers were less likely to participate in sufficient physical activity and more likely to meet vegetable recommendations than younger caregivers (data not shown).
Changes in health behaviours, and weight
Forty-two percent of caregivers reported having decreased their physical activity since their family member was diagnosed with cancer and 35% reported gaining weight (Fig. 1), although only 27% of caregivers gained weight to a level that was above the healthy BMI range. Most caregivers (>80%) reported no change in their fruit and vegetable consumption (Fig. 1). Twelve percent reported increasing their alcohol intake (Fig. 1), although only 8% of caregivers increased to above the guidelines of two standard drinks on any day. As 87% of caregivers were non-smokers at the time of their family member’s diagnosis, few changes were reported in smoking behaviour. Out of the 13 smokers at diagnosis, one reported increasing their daily cigarette intake.
Overall, 56% of ovarian cancer caregivers reported at least one out of the six negative changes in their heath behaviours or weight. The majority of these had one (32%) or two (16%) negative changes and 8% had greater than two.
Some positive changes were also reported by caregivers (Fig. 1): 14% reported increasing their physical activity, 20% reported losing weight without being underweight, 7% reported increasing their fruit and 13% reported increasing their vegetable consumption, 13% reported decreasing their alcohol intake without ceasing altogether and three out of the 13 smokers reported quitting smoking since their family member was diagnosed with cancer.
Correlates of negative health behaviour or body mass changes
The odds of caregivers reporting at least one negative change after their family member’s diagnosis were higher for those caregivers whose education was limited to school compared to further education (OR 3.0, 95%CI 1.1–8.4), those caregivers experiencing clinical levels of anxiety or depression (OR 3.4, 95%CI 1.1–10.1) or those caregivers who were unable to fully carry out their usual daily activities due to caregiving responsibilities (OR 2.0, 95%CI 0.7–5.4) (Table 3). Higher odds of reporting at least one negative change were also observed for caregivers who were caring for a woman whose disease was currently impacting on her ability to fully carry out her usual daily activities (OR 4.3, 95%CI 1.4–13.2). Caregiver’s gender and relationship to patient had clinically meaningful adjusted odds ratios with wide confidence intervals crossing 1.0 (Table 3). No other potential predictor variables described in the methods were associated with reporting at least one negative change.
Discussion
Ours is the first study to explore cancer caregivers’ health behaviours and changes after a family member’s cancer diagnosis. We found that while a proportion of caregivers maintained or improved their health behaviours and/or weight, more than half of caregivers described negative changes after becoming a caregiver. For caregivers whose behaviour improved, there may have been a teachable moment [27] where, along with cancer patients, they were persuaded to adopt healthy lifestyle changes. However, the inability of many ovarian cancer caregivers to sustain healthy habits is likely due to the emotional and physical demands placed on them during inevitable disease recurrences and disruptions to their routine. Our risk-factor analysis supports this theory as it indicated that when caregiving was reported to interfere with usual daily activities it was associated with negative lifestyle and weight changes.
In addition we identified that caregivers from low educational backgrounds, who experienced distress or who cared for a woman whose disease impacted on her usual daily activities, were high-risk groups for deteriorating self-care habits and/or excessive weight gain. Cancer caregivers who fit this profile may benefit from preventative strategies or interventions. A targeted approach directed at these subgroups would facilitate the delivery of limited health care resources [28] as well as avoid the need for publicly funded formal care for cancer patients by maintaining caregivers health [29]. Furthermore, as approximately one-quarter of ovarian cancer caregivers reported adopting more than one negative behaviour change and almost all the caregivers did not meet all Australian health guidelines, individually tailored interventions that have the capacity to target a range of health behaviours, where applicable, may be valuable in this caregiving group.
This was an opportunistic sub-study conducted to explore health behaviours among cancer caregivers. As such there are a number of limitations to acknowledge when considering our results. Our study design restricted recruitment to caregivers who remained in our overarching studies after several years. This meant we had a relatively small sample size and confidence intervals in our regression models are wide. As such emphasis is placed on clinically significant correlates rather than statistical significance. Also, Participants in the lifestyle sub-study tended to be longer-term caregivers and thus our results may not be generalisable to caregiving in the earlier time-phase after diagnosis.
There is also likely to be some recall bias related to asking patients to remember their health behaviours from several years ago and whether these have increased, decreased or stayed the same. While misclassification within these three broad categories is possible, it is unlikely that caregivers would selectively over-report negative changes, which are the main focus of our analyses. Caregivers may have felt pressure to report a healthier lifestyle so might have over-estimated positive behaviours. If this were the case the results reported here would only underestimate the magnitude of the problem.
Furthermore, from these data we were unable to tell if negative changes were directly related to caregiving or just reflective of ageing or other factors that occur within the general population. At face value, the proportion of ovarian cancer caregivers meeting Australian health guidelines for health behaviours and weight appears similar to the general population. The Australian Bureau of Statistics 2007–2008 National Health Survey indicated that 35% of Australian males aged 55–66 years were sedentary, 75% were overweight or obese, 47% ate inadequate serves of fruit, 93% ate inadequate serves of vegetables and 16% smoked [30]. However, the Australian Bureau of Statistics only records cross-sectional prevalences and there is no comparable published data on longitudinal changes in the general population over a similar timeframe. The fact that caregivers' changes occurred to a greater extent in subgroups with elevated emotional and physical demands suggests that it is less likely to be a simple consequence of aging. Our age-stratified analyses confirmed cross-sectional general population study findings [30] that older generations are less likely to participate in physical activity yet our multivariable modelling indicated that caregivers age was not associated with negative lifestyle changes over time. While it is probable that irrespective of the caregiving role some negative changes would have occurred, further research is needed to determine the proportion of behaviour change attributable directly to caring for a women with ovarian cancer.
Despite these limitations, findings from this current study suggest that more attention should be given to the health of cancer caregivers and that they may benefit from health promotion programs aimed at adopting and maintaining healthy lifestyles. Future studies are needed to document prospective levels and reasons for changes in cancer caregivers health behaviours after their family member’s diagnosis. If a program is required it may be economical to targeted high-risk groups and tailor the intervention to address each individual's range of unhealthy behaviours.
References
Dixon H, Chapman K, Hodge A, Slevin T (2005) Body weight, nutrition, alcohol and physical activity: key messages for The Cancer Council Australia. The Cancer Council Australia, Sydney
Girgis A, Lambert S (2009) Caregivers of cancer survivors: the state of the field. Cancer Forum 33
Kim Y, Schulz R (2008) Family caregivers’ strains: comparative analysis of cancer caregiving with dementia, diabetes, and frail elderly caregiving. J Aging Health 20:483–503
Baumgarten M, Hanley JA, Infante-Rivard C, Battista RN, Becker R, Gauthier S (1994) Health of family members caring for elderly persons with dementia. A longitudinal study. Ann Intern Med 120:126–132
Ergh TC, Hanks RA, Rapport LJ, Coleman RD (2003) Social support moderates caregiver life satisfaction following traumatic brain injury. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 25:1090–1101
Janda M, Steginga S, Dunn J, Langbecker D, Walker D, Eakin E (2008) Unmet supportive care needs and interest in services among patients with a brain tumour and their carers. Patient Educ Couns 71:251–258
Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Dura JR, Speicher CE, Trask OJ, Glaser R (1991) Spousal caregivers of dementia victims: longitudinal changes in immunity and health. Psychosom Med 53:345–362
Lee S, Colditz GA, Berkman LF, Kawachi I (2003) Caregiving and risk of coronary heart disease in U.S. women: a prospective study. Am J Prev Med 24:113–119
King AC, Oka RK, Young DR (1994) Ambulatory blood pressure and heart rate responses to the stress of work and caregiving in older women. J Gerontol 49:M239–M245
Schulz R, Beach SR (1999) Caregiving as a risk factor for mortality: the Caregiver Health Effects Study. JAMA 282:2215–2219
Lederberg M (1998) The family of the cancer patient. In: Holland J (ed) Psychooncology. Oxford University Press, New York
Scharlach AE, Midanik LT, Runkle MC, Soghikian K (1997) Health practices of adults with elder care responsibilities. Prev Med 26:155–161
Burton LC, Newsom JT, Schulz R, Hirsch CH, German PS (1997) Preventive health behaviors among spousal caregivers. Prev Med 26:162–169
Acton GJ (2002) Health-promoting self-care in family caregivers. West J Nurs Res 24:73–86
Lockwood-Rayermann S (2006) Survivorship issues in ovarian cancer: a review. Oncol Nurs Forum 33:553–562
Merritt MA, Green ALC, Nagle CM, Webb PM (2008) Talcum powder, chronic pelvic inflammation and NSAIDs in relation to risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Cancer 122:170–176
Tothill RW, Tinker AV, George J, Brown R, Fox SB, Lade S, Johnson DS, Trivett MK, Etemadmoghadam D, Locandro B, Traficante N, Fereday S, Hung JA, Chiew Y-E, Haviv I, Gertig D, DeFazio A, Bowtell DDL (2008) Novel molecular subtypes of serous and endometrioid ovarian cancer linked to clinical outcome. Clin Cancer Res 14:5198–5208
Jordan SJ, Green ALC, Whiteman DC, Moore SP, Bain CJ, Gertig DM, Webb PM (2008) Serous ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancers: a comparative epidemiological analysis. Int J Cancer 122:1598–1603
Basen-Engquist K, Bodurka-Bevers D, Fitzgerald M, Webster K, Cella D, Hu S, Gershenson D (2001) Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian. J Clin Oncol 19:1809–1817
Zigmond AS, Snaith RP (1983) The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 67:361–370
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2003) The active Australia survey: a guide and manual for implementation, analysis and reporting. AIHW, Canberra
Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care (1999) National physical activity guidelines for australians. Australian Government, Canberra
National Health and Medical Research Council (2004) Clinical practice guidelines for the management of overweight and obesity in adults. Australian Government, Canberra
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2006) National Health Survey: Summary of Results. ABS, City
Cashel K, Jeffreson S (1995) The core food groups. Australian Government, Canberra
National Health and Medical Research Council (2009) Australian guidelines to reduce health risks from drinking alcohol. Australian Government, Canberra
Demark-Wahnefried W, Aziz NM, Rowland JH, Pinto BM (2005) Riding the crest of the teachable moment: promoting long-term health after the diagnosis of cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:5814–5830
Foot G, Sanson-Fisher R (1995) Measuring the unmet needs of people living with cancer. Cancer Forum 19:131–135
Colerick E, George L (1986) Predictors of institutionalization among caregivers of patients with Alzheimer’s disease. J Am Geriatr Soc 34:493–498
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2009) 2007–2008 National health survey: summary of results. Australian Government, Canberra
Acknowledgements
AOCS-QoL was funded by the Cancer Councils of New South Wales and Queensland. Vanessa Beesley was funded by an NHMRC post-doctoral award, Penelope Webb by an NHMRC Research Fellowship and Melanie Price by a Research Fellowship from the School of Psychology at The University of Sydney. We thank Lynley Aldridge, Diana Grivas, Naomi McGowan and Rebekah Cicero for their help with the data tracking and management within the concurrent studies and all the women and their caregivers who gave their time to participate. We also acknowledge the US Army Medical Research and Materiel Command, the Cancer Council Tasmania, the Cancer Foundation of Western Australia and the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia for their AOCS funding as well as support from the Australian state-based Cancer Registries, collaborating institutions and investigators represented within the AOCS group listed at www.aocstudy.org.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beesley, V.L., Price, M.A., Webb, P.M. et al. Loss of lifestyle: health behaviour and weight changes after becoming a caregiver of a family member diagnosed with ovarian cancer. Support Care Cancer 19, 1949–1956 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-010-1035-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-010-1035-2