Abstract
Sand movement is a common stress for plants in dune ecosystems. Seedlings in such an environment often experience various degrees of denudation or burial. A field experiment was conducted with Artemisia ordosica, a dominant semi-shrub species in Mu Us sandland, China, to test seedling survival and growth under different degrees of denudation and burial. Seedlings from two cohorts with height of 5.0 ± 0.02 cm (S1) and 9.3 ± 0.09 cm (S2) were selected and randomly subjected to three denudation treatments (2.5, 5, and 10 cm), five burial treatments (2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, and 15 cm), or a control. S2 seedlings had a higher survivorship than S1 seedlings, especially under severe denudation (10 cm) and complete burial (5 cm in S1; 10 cm in S2). Seedling survivorship was unaffected by moderate burial (<5 cm in S1; <10 cm in S2) or denudation (<10 cm), but it was significantly reduced under complete burial or severe denudation. Seedling growth in leaf area, height, and biomass only declined in severe denudation or complete burial. Seedling burial led to higher biomass investment in shoots, while the reverse was the case in denudation. The results indicate A. ordosica is highly tolerant to moderate burial and denudation, showing adaptive responses that likely increase survival. Differences in responses between seedling cohorts suggest that large seedling size is beneficial for successful establishment in sandy environments and measures to prevent severe denudation and burial of recently germinated seedlings are necessary in attempts to restore steppe vegetations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Sand movement by wind is a common event in coastal and inland dune ecosystems (Moreno-Casasola 1986; Maun 1994; Danin 1996; Brown 1997; Yu et al. 2002, 2004, 2008). As a result, plants growing on the windward slopes of dunes may experience various degrees of denudation and those on the leeward slopes often suffer from partial or complete burial, while on the crest both denudation and burial may occur (Maun 1998; Yu et al. 2004, 2008). Small seedlings are most vulnerable to burial and denudation, as a few centimetres of removed or added sand may result in full exposure of the root system or complete coverage of the aboveground plant parts. Thus, the ability of seedlings to withstand denudation and burial is crucial for successful establishment and population maintenance of dune species.
The most important stresses caused by wind denudation include water loss and elevated temperature in the root system after exposure (Fryrear et al. 1973; Maun 1998; Yu et al. 2008). Long-term deep burial may strongly suppress seedling growth as it creates a physical barrier for vertical growth, reduces the photosynthetic area, and limits oxygen availability to roots (Harris and Davy 1988; Maun 1994). When burial is short-term and relatively shallow, it may promote plant growth in terms of vertical elongation (Disraeli 1984; Shi et al. 2004; Dech and Maun 2006; Zhao et al. 2007), number of leaves (Shi et al. 2004), and biomass (Brown 1997; Shi et al. 2004; Dech and Maun 2006; Zhao et al. 2007; Liu et al. 2008).
Tolerance of seedlings to various degrees of burial has been widely studied in herbaceous (Maun and Lapierre 1984; Zhang 1996) and woody species (Brown 1997; Shi et al. 2004; Dech and Maun 2006), but denudation responses are less clear (Fryrear et al. 1973; Yu et al. 2008). Moreover, no study has tested the effects of both denudation and burial on the same plant species. Such comparative studies are relevant as adaptation to these opposing stresses may involve completely different strategies.
Here we report effects of both burial and denudation on seedlings of the desert woody species Artemisia ordosica, a semi-shrub that is thriving in inland dune harsh conditions of strong sand denudation and burial. A. ordosica is a dominant species in the Mu Us sandland, a semi-arid area with highly mobile sand located in the Ordos Plateau, Inner Mongolia, China (Zhang 1994; Kobayashi et al. 1995). Vegetation restoration is currently a major issue in Mu Us sandland with A. ordosica being one of the main plants used (Zhang 1994; Kobayashi et al. 1995; Huang and Gutterman 2000). A. ordosica is distributed in fixed, semi-fixed as well as semi-mobile sand dunes (Zhang 1994; Kobayashi et al. 1995; Huang and Gutterman 2000). The wind-dispersed seeds of A. ordosica reach both windward and leeward sites of dunes and germinate continuously during the main growing season (from May to September). Thus, at every moment there are seedlings belonging to various cohorts that differ in size (Huang and Gutterman 2000; Zhu et al. 2004; Zheng et al. 2006). These cohorts likely vary in survival rates and in response to denudation and burial. Here we investigate the tolerance of different-sized seedlings of A. ordosica to denudation and burial in terms of survivorship, growth, and biomass allocation in a field experiment.
Materials and methods
Study site
This study was conducted at Ordos Sandland Ecological Station (OSES, 39°29′37.6″ N, 110°11′29.4″ E) of the Institute of Botany of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, located in the southeastern Ordos Plateau in Inner Mongolia, China. This is a semi-arid area, with the mean annual temperature of 7.5–9.0°C, maximum of 20–24°C in July and minimum of −12 to −8°C in January. The mean annual precipitation is 260–450 mm, which is concentrated in summer, following a prolonged spring drought (Zhang 1994). Formerly, highly productive grassland was present in the region (Zhang 1994). However, due to serious desertification caused by overgrazing, mining, and inappropriate agricultural management practices, it has been degraded to a steppe or desert vegetation dominated by shrubs and herbs, in which sand movements are frequent (Zhang 1994; Ohte et al. 2003; Yu et al. 2004, 2008).
The mean annual wind speed in 2007 was 2.06 ± 0.13 m s−1 (mean ± SE), with strong wind (≥17 m s−1) for 23 days and mainly occurring in spring and early summer (recorded at the Weather Station at OSES). An ongoing study on natural sand movement at OSES showed that sand removal caused denudation of 2.63 ± 0.36 cm within 15 days with the maximum of 4.98 cm, while sand addition led to 3.3 ± 0.63 cm burials within 15 days with the maximum of 10.47 cm (16 intervals of 15 days; 57 measurement sticks; OSES, unpublished data).
Study species
Artemisia ordosica Krasch (Asteraceae) is a shrub of approximately 0.5–1.0 m tall consisting of short-lived shoots which bear plumose, linearly lobate leaves. It is endemic to the Ordos-Alashan region, but overwhelmingly dominant in the Mu Us sand district on semi-fixed or fixed dunes, and sometimes occurs on active sand dunes. Shrubland dominated by A. ordosica covers 31% of the whole Mu Us district (Kobayashi et al. 1995). A. ordosica plays an important role in combating desertification and rehabilitating desertified dunes. Natural regeneration is generally realized by seeds, although plants may occasionally split into clonal fragments. Small seedlings often experience various depths of denudation or burial (Kobayashi et al. 1995; Yu et al. 2002; Zhang et al. 2002; Li et al. 2005).
Experimental design
The experiment was carried out in an area of about 1,000 m2 close to the OSES station, in flat terrain with vegetation dominated by A. ordosica (70% of cover), and presence of Hedysarum laeve, Bassia dasyphylla and Incarvillea sinensis (summed cover < 5%). On 16 May, 2007, 423 naturally regenerated seedlings from two cohorts were selected at this lowland area, with 270 small seedlings of 5.0 ± 0.02 cm high (S1), and 153 large seedlings of 9.3 ± 0.09 cm high (S2). All seedlings were at least 1 m away from adult A. ordosica shrubs and 30 cm away from each other. An additional number of 20 seedlings per cohort (S1 and S2) were excavated and harvested at the onset of the study to obtain starting values of biomass. The roots of small seedlings and large seedlings penetrated 19.5 ± 0.75 cm and 22.5 ± 0.72 cm into the soil, respectively.
Experimental seedlings were randomly assigned to 1 of the following 9 treatments: denudation by removal of 2.5, 5 or 10 cm, sand burial by 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10 or 15 cm, or control (no burial or denudation). To sustain new soil levels in the treatments and limit influx and efflux of sand, we placed white plastic drainage tubes (13.3 cm in diameter) around all seedlings (including the control treatment). Seedlings were kept vertical while being buried or kept vertical by sticks after denudation. After applying the treatment, we marked the new soil level on the tubes for later reference. Changes in the actual soil level were monitored on a weekly basis, and sand was added or removed whenever actual soil level was lower or higher than the treatment level. Each of the nine treatments comprised 30 replicates in S1 and 17 replicates in S2. The study was carried out within a fenced area without grazing. The experiment terminated after 126 days, on 19 September 2007. It was conducted entirely within the growing season.
Measurements
At the end of the experiment, seedling survival was recorded. For all surviving seedlings height relative to the original soil level was measured, as well as diameter at that level. Then, all plants were carefully excavated, and each plant was separated into leaf, stem, and root. Leaf images were obtained by a scanner and leaf area was then measured by analyzing the leaf images (ImageJ, National Institute of Health, USA). Leaf, stem, and root biomass of these seedlings, as well as those initially harvested were determined after drying at 80°C for 48 h. Relative growth rates of height and total biomass during the experimental period were calculated using data obtained during initial and end harvests (Padilla et al. 2007). To calculate relative height growth, we used the initial height measurements of all individuals at the onset of the experiment. To calculate relative biomass growth rate, we used average values obtained from destructive harvests of 20 individuals per size class (S1 and S2) at the start of the experiment.
Statistical analysis
Binary logistic regression was used to test the effects of treatments and cohort on seedling survival. When the test showed significant differences, multiple comparisons among treatments within each cohort were carried out through simple binary logistic regression, with each P value corrected according to Bonferroni criteria, by multiplying the original P value with the numbers of pairwise comparisons made between treatments.
The effects of treatment and cohort on final seedling height, stem diameter, leaf area, biomass, relative growth rates, and root to shoot ratio were analyzed using two-way ANOVA. If ANOVA showed significant differences, multiple comparisons among treatments within each cohort were conducted using Scheffe tests. Heteroscedastic variables were log-transformed to meet ANOVA assumptions. The burial treatments deeper than 5 cm in S1 and 10 cm in S2 were not included in these analyses, as no seedlings survived these treatments. All analyses were conducted with SPSS ver.15.0 (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, USA) and differences were considered significant at P < 0.05. Data are presented as means ± 1 SE.
Results
Survivorship
Survivorship of A. ordosica was significantly affected by both treatment (Wald statistic = 53.46, df = 1, P < 0.001) and cohort (Wald statistic = 29.04, df = 1, P < 0.001). S2 generally showed higher survival rate than S1 (Fig. 1). In S1, seedling survival was not significantly affected by partial burial or by denuding the plants up to 5 cm, and survivorship in these treatments was 50% or more. However, the survival rate was significantly reduced to 27% when the denudation depth was increased to 10 cm, and it declined sharply to 20% in complete burial. No seedlings survived complete burial, i.e. burial depth >5 cm for S1 and >10 cm for S2 (Fig. 1). Almost complete burial (5 cm for S1 and 10 cm for S2) significantly decreased survival, but moderate burial did not lead to increased mortality (Fig. 1).
Plant size and biomass allocation
Burial/denudation treatment and cohort significantly influenced final height, stem diameter, leaf area, and biomass (Table 1). Final size generally was larger for S2 compared to S1. In small seedlings (S1), final height, stem diameter, leaf area, and biomass were not significantly affected by any of the denudation or burial treatments (all multiple comparisons P > 0.05, Fig. 2a, c, e, g). Similarly, we found no effect of treatments on final height or leaf area in large seedlings (S2, Fig. 2b, f). Only final stem diameter and biomass in S2 were significantly reduced in 10 cm denudation and/or 10 cm burial treatments (Fig. 2d, h).
Leaf area ratio remained similar to control in all treatments and both cohorts (Table 1). Root to shoot ratio was significantly affected by the treatment of denudation and burial, but not by size (Table 1). In S1, root to shoot ratio was higher for denudation treatments and lower for burial treatments (Fig. 2i). In S2, it was also increased in 10 cm denudation treatments (Fig. 2j).
Relative growth rates
Relative growth rates (RGRs) of height and biomass were significantly affected by both cohort and depths of denudation and burial (Table 1), with higher values for S1. In S1, RGR of height or biomass was not significantly affected by any of the burial and denudation treatments (Fig. 3a, c). In S2, there was no effect of denudation or burial on RGR of height, but RGR of biomass was significantly reduced in the 10 cm burial treatment with respect to the control (Fig. 3b, d).
Discussion
Effects on seedling survival
In our experiment, larger seedlings showed generally higher survival rates than smaller ones and the deep burial and denudation were more detrimental to smaller seedlings. This may help to explain the considerably lower abundance of larger seedlings (>10 cm height) compared to smaller ones, which was also observed in a demographic census in the study area (S.-L. Li unpublished data). This result indicates that gaining sufficient size before substantial sand denudation or accumulation happens is beneficial for seedlings to increase chances for survival and successful establishment in moving dune environments.
We found high mortality after complete burial of A. ordosica seedlings. Similar results were reported for various coastal and riverine dune species (Zhang and Maun 1990; Maun 1996). Our results contrast those for some Inner Mongolia species, e.g. Hedysarum laeve and Ulmus pumila of which seedlings succeeded to emerge from complete burial, although with strongly reduced vigour and incapable of surviving renewed burial (Zhang et al. 2002; Shi et al. 2004).
Moderate denudation did not affect seedling survivorship of A. ordosica in our experiment. This species has deeper roots and this trait may help the seedlings to survive water stress as a result of denudation, which is usually a main cause of death of many other dune species (Maun 1998).
Effects on seedling growth and biomass allocation
Small A. ordosica seedlings realized higher relative growth rates in terms of height and biomass compared to large seedlings. In spite of their higher growth rates, the young-seedling cohort was still smaller than the older cohort at the end of experiment. Thus, early size differences due to variation in seedling emergence likely will have a long-term effect on seedling performance.
The growth of the A. ordosica seedlings that had survived burial was not affected, as long as their burial was not complete. Similar results were reported in some other dune species (McLeod and Murphy 1983; Brown 1997; Maun 1998). The continued growth after moderate burial was probably possible as seedlings were able to rapidly recover lost leaf area. Maintenance of photosynthetic tissue was considered to be an adaptive trait to burial (Wagner 1964; Shi et al. 2004; Perumal and Maun 2006).
Only severe denudation treatments reduced the growth of the large A. ordosica seedlings, probably because of root exposure to the air and reduced capacity to take up water and nutrients (Fryrear et al. 1973; Eldred and Maun 1982; Yu et al. 2002, 2008). However, as long as denudation did not exceed 10 cm, seedling growth remained remarkably constant. The deeper root of A. ordosica seedling is likely an important trait that allowed resisting denudation.
Seedlings of A. ordosica showed different biomass allocation patterns in response to burial and denudation. Proportionally more biomass was allocated to shoots in burial treatments and to roots in denudation treatments. More investment in shoots after burial was also reported for many other specialized dune species (McLeod and Murphy 1983; Maun and Lapierre 1984; Brown 1997, Liu et al. 2008). Shifting resources from roots to aboveground components supports the vertical elongation of stems, facilitates emergence from a deep location and compensates the loss of photosynthetic tissues buried in sand and thus restore the photosynthetic capacity of the plants (Harris and Davy 1988; Zhang and Maun 1992; Brown 1997; Dech and Maun 2006). However, contrasting results have also been reported in several other species such as Hedysarum laeve, and another two Artemisia species of A. wudanica and A. halodendron, which showed unchanged biomass allocation under burial (Zhang et al. 2002; Liu et al. 2008). Allocation changes after denudation were also adaptive, as A. ordosica increased biomass allocation to roots, thus restoring the capacity for uptake of water and nutrients (Callaway et al. 1994; Wang 2005; Zheng et al. 2006).
Conclusions
We showed that A. ordosica seedlings resisted moderate levels of sand denudation and burial. The rates of survival and growth under denudation and burial showed remarkably similar to control as long as the plants were not extremely denudated or completely buried. A. ordosica seedlings are able to change biomass allocation under denudation and burial, indicating high adaptation to the moving dune environment. Differences in survival responses between seedlings of different cohorts show that gaining sufficient size before substantial sand denudation or accumulation happens is beneficial for successful seedling establishment in sandy environments. This also suggests that artificial sand binding measures are necessary in steppe restoration projects to prevent that extreme denudation and sand addition lead to large-scale mortality of recently germinated seedlings.
References
Brown JF (1997) Effects of experimental burial on survival, growth, and resource allocation of three species of dune plants. J Ecol 85:151–158
Callaway RM, Delucia EH, Schlesinger WH (1994) Biomass allocation of montane and desert ponderosa pine: an analog for response to climate change. Ecology 75:1474–1481
Danin A (1996) Adaptations of Stipagrostis species to desert dunes. J Arid Environ 34:297–311
Dech JP, Maun MA (2006) Adventitious root production and plastic resource allocation to biomass determine burial tolerance in woody plants from central Canadian coastal dunes. Ann Bot 98:1095–1105
Disraeli DJ (1984) The effect of sand deposits on the growth and morphology of Ammophila breviligulata. J Eco 72:145–154
Eldred RA, Maun MA (1982) A multivariate approach to the problem of decline in vigour of Ammophila. Can J Bot 60:1371–1380
Fryrear DW, Stubbendieck J, McCully WG (1973) Grass seedling response to wind and windblown sand. Crop Sci 13:622–625
Harris D, Davy AJ (1988) Carbon and nutrient allocation in Elymus farctus seedlings after burial with sand. Ann Bot 61:147–157
Huang ZY, Gutterman Y (2000) Comparison of germination strategies of Artemisia ordosica with its two congeners from deserts of China and Israel. Acta Bot Sin 42:71–80
Kobayashi T, Liao RT, Li SQ (1995) Ecophysiological behavior of Artemisia ordosica on the process of sand dune fixation. Ecol Res 10:339–349
Li FR, Zhang AS, Duan SS, Kang LF (2005) Patterns of reproductive allocation in Artemisia halodendron inhabiting two contrasting habitats. Acta Oecol 28:57–64
Liu B, Liu ZM, Guan DX (2008) Seedling growth variation in response to sand burial in four Artemisia species from different habitats in the semi-arid dune field. Trees Struct Funct 22:41–47
Maun MA (1994) Adaptations enhancing survival and establishment of seedlings on coastal dune systems. Vegetatio 111:59–70
Maun MA (1996) The effects of burial by sand on survival and growth of Calamovilfa longifolia. Ecoscience 3:93–100
Maun MA (1998) Adaptations of plants to burial in coastal sand dunes. Can J Bot 76:713–738
Maun MA, Lapierre J (1984) The effects of burial by sand on Ammophila breviligulata. J Ecol 72:827–839
McLeod KW, Murphy PG (1983) Factors affecting growth of Ptelea trifoliata seedlings. Can J Bot 61:2410–2415
Moreno-Casasola P (1986) Sand movement as a factor in the distribution of plant communities in a coastal dune system. Vegetatio 65:67–76
Ohte N, Koba K, Yoshikawa K, Sugimoto A, Matsuo N, Kabeya N, Wang LH (2003) Water utilization of natural and planted trees in the semiarid desert of Inner Mongolia, China. Ecol Appl 13:337–351
Padilla FM, Miranda JD, Pugnaire FI (2007) Early root growth plasticity in seedlings of three Mediterranean woody species. Plant Soil 296:103–113
Perumal VJ, Maun MA (2006) Ecophysiological response of dune species to experimental burial under field and controlled conditions. Plant Ecol 184:89–104
Shi L, Zhang ZJ, Zhang CY, Zhang JZ (2004) Effects of sand burial on survival, growth, gas exchange and biomass allocation of Ulmus pumila seedlings in the Hunshandak Sandland, China. Ann Bot 94:553–560
Wagner RH (1964) The ecology of Uniola paniculata in the dune-strand habitat of North Carolina. Ecol Monogr 34:79–96
Wang RZ (2005) Demographic variation and biomass allocation of Agropyron cristatum grown on steppe and dune sites in the Hunshandake Desert, North China. Grass Forage Sci 60:99–102
Yu FH, Chen YF, Dong M (2002) Clonal integration enhances survival and performance of Potentilla anserina, suffering from partial sand burial on Ordos plateau, China. Evol Ecol 15:303–318
Yu FH, Dong M, Krusi B (2004) Clonal integration helps Psammochloa villosa survive sand burial in an inland dune. New Phytol 162:697–704
Yu FH, Wang N, He WM, Chu Y, Dong M (2008) Adaptation of rhizome connections in drylands: Increasing tolerance of clones to wind erosion. Ann Bot 102:571–577
Zhang XS (1994) Principles and optimal models for development of Maowusu sandy grassland. Acta Phytoecol Sin 18:1–16 (in Chinese, with English abstract)
Zhang JH (1996) Interactive effects of soil nutrients, moisture and sand burial on the development, physiology, biomass and fitness of Cakile edentula. Ann Bot 78:591–598
Zhang JH, Maun MA (1990) Effects of sand burial on seed germination, seedling emergence, survival, and growth of Agropyron psammophilum. Can J Bot 68:304–310
Zhang JH, Maun MA (1992) Effects of burial in sand on the growth and reproduction of Cakile edentula. Ecography 15:296–302
Zhang CY, Yu FH, Dong M (2002) Effects of sand burial on the survival, growth, and biomass allocation in semi-shrub Hedysarum laeve seedlings. Acta Bot Sin 44:337–343
Zhao WZ, Li QY, Fang HY (2007) Effects of sand burial disturbance on seedling growth of Nitraria sphaerocarpa. Plant Soil 295:95–102
Zheng YR, Xie ZX, Jiang LH, Shimizu H, Rimmington GM, Zhou GS (2006) Vegetation responses along environmental gradients on the Ordos plateau, China. Ecol Res 21:396–404
Zhu XW, Huang ZY, Chu Y, Zhang SM, Liu HD, Dong M (2004) Effects of burial in sand and seed size on seed germination and seedling emergence in two leguminous shrubs in the Otindag Sandland, China. Israel J Plant Sci 52:133–142
Acknowledgments
We thank Paul Westers and Heinjo During for help with statistical analysis and Chang-Yuan Li, Jian-Jiang Qiao, Guo-Fang Liu, Bin Jiang and Jun-Qing Yang for assistance with field work. This research was supported by NSFC (30770357), the National Key Basic Research Program of China (2007CB106802) and a CAS-KNAW joint PhD Training Program.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Communicated by B. Engelbrecht.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, SL., Werger, M.J.A., Zuidema, P.A. et al. Seedlings of the semi-shrub Artemisia ordosica are resistant to moderate wind denudation and sand burial in Mu Us sandland, China. Trees 24, 515–521 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-010-0422-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-010-0422-0