Abstract
Background: The laparoscopic ultrasound (US) probe provides a new modality for evaluating biliary anatomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).
Methods: We performed a laparoscopic US examination in 65 patients without suspected common bile duct (CBD) stones prior to the performance of a laparoscopic cholangiogram (IOC). We then compared the cost, time required, surgeon's assessment of difficulty, and interpretations of findings.
Results: There was a significant difference in the cost of US versus the cost of IOC ($362 ± 12 versus $665 ± 12; p < 0.05). Surgeons who had performed >10 US (EXP) were compared with those who had performed ≤10 (NOV). There were significant differences between the EXP and NOV groups in ease of examination, visualization of biliary anatomy, and accuracy of measurement of the CBD.
Conclusions: The use of laparoscopic US for the accurate evaluation of the CBD and biliary anatomy requires that the surgeon has surpassed the learning curve, which we have defined as having performed >10 US exams.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received: 1 May 1998/Accepted: 21 October 1998
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Falcone, Jr., R., Fegelman, E., Nussbaum, M. et al. A prospective comparison of laparoscopic ultrasound vs intraoperative cholangiogram during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 13, 784–788 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649901099
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649901099