Abstract
Background
In this study, the clinical results and cost-effectiveness of open vs laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis were compared
Methods
Over a 5-year period (1994–98), 894 cholecystectomies were performed, 545 (60.96%) of them laparoscopically and 349 (39.04%) by the open method. The study included 209 patients with a clinical diagnosis of acute cholecystitis; 115 (55.02%) of them were operated on by the open method and 94 (44.98%) by the laparoscopic method.
Results
A comparison analysis revealed that the mean postoperative treatment period was 8.40 days after open and 4.38 days after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In the group operated on by the open method, 106 patients received an antibiotic, a mean of 5.09 ampules and 3.2 tablets or suppositories of an analgesic, and 2.91 dressings per patient; whereas in the group submitted to the laparoscopic method, the comparable figures were 43, 3.13, 2.1, and 1.47, respectively. In 31 (26.96%) employed patients operated on by the open method, the mean absenteeism from work was 42 days; whereas in 31 (32.98%) of those operated on by the laparoscopic method, it was 17 days. The mean operating times for the procedures were 89 and 115 min for the open and laparoscopic methods, respectively. Two patients submitted to open cholecystectomy died within 30 days post-operatively. Wound infection was recorded in 10 (8.7%), prolonged biliary secretion in two, and cicatricial hernia in five (4.35%) patients. In the group submitted to laparoscopic cholecystectomy, there were no deaths; nine (9.57%) conversions were required; four patients had to be reoperated on, two of them for bile lobe hemorrhage and two for massive biliary secretion from the open cystic duct; herniation at the site of supraumbilical incision developed in three patients, and infection developed at the same site in two (2.13%) patients. The hospital cost was significantly higher in laparoscopic patients ($1181 vs $873) USD), as was the total cost of treatment for acute cholecystitis ($1430 vs $1316). However, the cost for sick leave and rehabilitation was significantly lower in laparoscopically treated patients ($486 vs $1199).
Conclusions
Our comparison analysis of the results and cost-effectiveness of the surgical treatment of acute cholecystitis clearly pointed to the advantages of laparoscopic over open cholecystectomy —i.e., better clinical outcome and a more rapid resumption of daily activities. Hospital and total costs of treatment were on average higher in laparoscopic patients, except for the employed ones, where the lower sick leave cost translated into a significant reduction in total costs.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Čala Z (1996) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an original three-trocar technique. World J Surg 20: 117–118
Čala Z, Velnič, D, Cvitanovič B, Rašič Ž, Perko Z (1996) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results after 1000 procedures. Acta Med Croatica 50: 147–149
Cox MR, Wilson TG, Luck AJ, Jeans PL, Padbury RT, Toouli J (1993) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute inflammation of the gallbladder. Ann Surg 218: 630–634
Cuschieri A (1993) Cost effectiveness of endoscopic surgery. Health Econ 2: 367–369
Cuschieri A, Dubois F, Mouiel J, Mouret P, Becker H, Buess G, Trede M, Troidl H (1991) The European experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 161: 385–387
Deziel DJ, Milikan KW, Economou SG, Doolas A, Ko ST, Airan MC (1993) Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survery of 4,292 hospitals and an analysis of 77,604 cases. Am J Surg 165: 9–14
Grace PA, Quereshi A, Coleman J, Keane R, McEntee G, Broe P, Osborne H, Bouchier-Hayes D (1991) Reduced postoperative hospitalization after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 78: 160–162
Hawasli A, Lloyd LR (1991) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The learning curve: report of 50 patients. Am Surg 57: 542–545
Kum CK, Goh PM, Isaac JR, Tekant Y, Ngoi SS (1994) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treatment of acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg 81: 1651–1654
Lo CM, Fan ST, Liu CL, Lai ECS, Wong J (1997) Early decision for conversion of laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy for treatment of acute cholecystitis. Am J Surg 173: 513–517
Lo CM, Liu CL, Lai EC, Fan ST, Wong J (1996) Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treatment of acute cholecystitis. Ann Surg 223: 37–42
McSherry CK (1989) Cholecystectomy: the gold standard. Am J Surg 158: 174–178
Morgenstern L, Wond L, Berci G (1992) Twelve hundred open cholecystectomies before the laparoscopic era: a standard for comparison. Arch Surg 127: 400–403
Perissat J (1993) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the European experience. Am J Surg 165: 444–449
Peters JH, Krailadsiri W, Incarbone R, Bremner CG, Froes E, Ireland AP, Crookes P, Ortega AE, Anthone GA, Stain SA (1994) Reason for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy in a urban teaching hospital. Am J Surg 168: 555–559
Rettner DW, Ferguson C, Warshaw AL (1993) Factors associated with successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Ann Surg 217: 233–236
Roslyn JJ, Binns GS, Hughes EFX, Saunders-Kirkwood K, Zinner MJ, Cates JA (1993) Open cholecystectomy: a contemporary analysis of 42,747 patients. Ann Surg 218: 129–137
Shea JA, Healey MJ, Berlin JA, Clarke JR, Malet PF, Staroscik RN, Schwartz JS, Williams SV (1996) Mortality and complications associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 224: 609–620
Soper NJ, Stockmann PT, Dunegan DL, Ashley SW (1992) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the new “gold standard”. Arch Surg 127: 917–923
Southern Surgeons Club, Moore MJ, Bennett CL (1995) The learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 170: 55–59
Traverso LW, Hargrave K (1995) A prospective cost analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 169: 503–506
Unger SW, Rosenbaum G, Unger HM, Edelman DS (1993) A comparison of laparoscopic and open treatment of acute cholecystitis. Surg Endosc 7: 408–411
Wenner J, Graffner H, Lindell G (1995) A financial analysis of laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 9: 702–705
Zucker KA, Flowers JL, Bailey RW, Graham SM, Buell J, Imbembo AL (1993) Laparoscopic management of acute cholecystitis. Am J Surg 165: 508–514
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Online publication: 12 December 2000
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Glavić, Ž., Begić, L., Šimleša, D. et al. Treatment of acute cholecystitis. Surg Endosc 15, 398–401 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640000333
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640000333