Abstract
Background
We set out to investigate the potential benefits of routine diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) in cases of acute abdomen.
Methods
A prospective study of 120 DL in acute abdominal cases was performed in comparison with 310 similar acute abdominal cases treated without DL. The diagnostic accuracy, hospital stay, therapeutic delay, and convalescence time were then evaluated.
Results
DL established the indications for intervention in 96% of cases, yielded a diagnosis in 90%, and changed the treatment in 14%. The sensitivity achieved was 99.3%, specificity was 83.3%, and accuracy was 88.6%. There were two false positives, one false negative, and three results insufficient to make a diagnosis. Morbidity was one (0.8%), and mortality was one (0.8%). Seventy-nine patients (66%) were managed by laparoscopy and 24 by open interventions. The hospital stay in DL groups was shorter (median, 5 days vs 6 days in controls, p<0.0003), as was the effective treatment time (median, 5 days vs 6 days, p<0.0012). The convalescence time was also shorter in DL groups (median, 14 days vs 14 days, p<0.04). Therapeutic delay occurred in 16% of the control group cases, doubling the morbidity rate, increasing mortality by 50%, and prolonging hospital stay (median, 9 days vs 6 days, p>0.3 (NS).
Conclusions
DL in the acute abdomen is a safe and accurate procedure that enables laparoscopic interventions and helps avoid nontherapeutic surgery. DL and appropriate treatment reduces hospital stay, therapeutic delay, and convalescence time.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Brandt CP, Priebe PP, Eckhauser ML (1993) Diagnostic laparoscopy in the intensive care patient, avoiding the non-therapeutic laparotomy. Surg Endosc 7: 168–172
Box JC, Duncan T, Ramshaw B, Tucker JG, Mason EM, Wilson JP, Melton D, Lucas GW (1997) Laparoscopy in the evaluation and treatment of patients with AIDS and acute abdominal complaints. Surg Endosc 11: 1026–1028
Chia-Ming C, Shi-Ming L, Shyn-Ming P, Cheng-Shyong W, Yun-Fan L (1994) The role of laparoscopy in the evaluation of ascites of unknown origin. Gastrointest Endosc. 40: 285–289
Chung RS, Diaz JJ, Chiari V (1998) Efficacy of routine laparoscopy for the acute abdomen. Surg Endosc 12: 219–222
Cuesta MA, Eijsbouts OAJ, Gordijn RV, Borgstein PJ, DeJong D (1998) Diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with an acute abdomen of uncertain etiology. Surg Endosc 12: 915–917
Cueto J, Diaz O, Garteiz D, Rodriguez M, Weber A (1997) The efficacy of laparoscopic surgery in the diagnosis and treatment of peritonitis. Surg Endosc 11: 366–370
Ditmars ML, Bongard F (1996) Laparoscopy for triage of penetrating trauma: the decision to explore. J Laparosc Endosc 6: 285–291
Easter DW, Cuschieri A, Nathanson LK, Lavelle-Jones M (1992) The utility of diagnostic laparoscopy for abdominal disorders. Arch Surg 27: 379–383
Geiss WP, Kim HC (1995) Use of laparoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with surgical abdominal sepsis. Surg Endosc 9: 178–182
Halverson A (1998) Evaluation of mechanism of increased intracranial pressure with insufflation. Surg Endosc 12: 266–266
Hauser CJ, Poole GV, Thomae KR (1996) Laparoscopic surgery and the management of traumatic hemoperitoneum in stable patients [Letter]. Surg Endosc 10: 694
Lepaniemi AK, Eliot DC (1996) The role of laparoscopy in blunt abdominal trauma. Ann Med 28: 483–489
Livingston DH, Tortella BJ, Blackwood J, Machiedo GW, Rush BF (1992) The role of laparoscopy in abdominal trauma. J Trauma 33: 471–475
Lujan-Mompean JA (1995) Laparoscopic surgery in the management of traumatic hemoperitoneum in stable patients. Surg Endosc 9: 879
Marks JM, Youngelmann D, Teri Berk F (1997) Cost analysis of diagnostic laparoscopy versus laparotomy in the evaluation of penetrating abdominal trauma. Surg Endosc 11: 272–276
Nagy AG, James D (1989) Diagnostic laparoscopy. Am J Surg 157: 490–493
Ogbonna BC, Obekpa PO, Momoh JT, Obafunwa JO, Nwana EJ (1992) Laparoscopy in developing countries, in the management of patients with an acute abdomen. Br J Surg 79: 964–966
Orlando III R, Crowell KL (1997) Laparoscopy in the critically ill. Surg Endosc 11: 1072–1074
Paterson-Brown S (1993) Emergency laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 80: 279–283
Rossi P, Mulins D, Thal E (1993) Role of laparoscopy in the evaluation of abdominal trauma. Am J Surg 166: 707–711
Salky BA, Edye MB (1998) The role of laparoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of abdominal pain syndromes. Surg Endosc 12: 911–914
Schrenk P, Woisetschlager R, Wayand WU, Rieger R, Sulzbacher H (1994) Diagnostic laparoscopy: a survey of 92 patients. Am J Surg 168: 348–351
Van der Velpen GC, Shimi SM, Cushieri A (1994) Diagnostic yield and management benefit of laparoscopy: a prospective audit. Gut 35: 1617–1621
Zantut LF (1997) Diagnostic and therapeutic laparoscopy for a penetrating abdominal trauma. J Trauma 42: 825–177
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Online publication: 22 August 2000
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Majewski, W. Diagnostic laparoscopy for the acute abdomen and trauma. Surg Endosc 14, 930–937 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640000197
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640000197