Abstract
Background
Seroma is the most common early minor complication of inguinal hernia repair. Seromas generally resolve spontaneously within a few weeks, but can sometimes cause other complications. The optimal ways to repair inguinal hernia and handle the hernial sac are still debatable. Large scale, prospective, randomized, controlled studies focusing on the correlation between transection of the hernial sac and seroma formation are scarce.
Methods
A total of 159 adult male patients with primary indirect inguinal hernia who underwent laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair were recruited. The patients were randomized to undergo either complete dissection or transection of the hernial sacs. Patients were followed up at postoperative 7 days, 1 and 3 months, looking specifically for seroma. Seroma was diagnosed via physical examination, and a prestructured form was used to evaluate patient recovery and define the type of seroma present at each follow-up visit.
Results
There were 83 patients in the completely dissected group and 76 in the transected group. The overall incidence of postoperative seroma was 12.6% (n = 20). The χ2 test demonstrated that significantly more patients developed seroma in the transected group than in the completely dissected group (18.4% vs. 7.2%, p = 0.034); there were also significant differences between the two groups in the incidences of seroma at postoperative 7 days (18.4% vs. 6.0%, p = 0.016) and 1 month (14.5% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.037). Seroma formation was correlated with age, body mass index, use of anticoagulants, hernia type, hernia size, sac size, and operative time. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the degree of postoperative pain and time taken for the resumption of outdoor activities.
Conclusions
When using the laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal technique for indirect inguinal hernia repair, the risk of postoperative seroma formation is greater after transection compared with complete dissection of the hernial sac.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
A seroma is a sterile accumulation of serum in a circumscribed location in the tissue, and is the most common early minor complication after inguinal hernia repair [1]. Seromas usually resolve within a few weeks; however, this condition can sometimes lead to many other complications. An infected seroma is one of the most challenging complications, and can even result in mesh removal [2] and hernia recurrence [3]. Furthermore, patients can misperceive a seroma as a persistent or recurrent hernia.
The optimal ways to repair inguinal hernias and handle the hernial sacs are still debatable, with only few reports on this issue in the literature. For indirect hernias that are difficult to treat, it is suggested that the hernial sacs are transected to prevent spermatic cord injuries and lower the chance of scrotal hematoma; in contrast, complete dissection of large indirect sacs reportedly carries a risk of harming the cord structures or disturbing the blood circulation to the testis [4]. Failure to dispose of the distal sacs may result in large and potentially cumbersome hematomas, seromas, or pseudohydroceles [4, 5]. The clinical factors reportedly associated with seroma formation include old age, large hernial defects, extension of the hernia into the scrotum, and the presence of a residual distal indirect sac. For inguinoscrotal hernias, it has been recommended that the indirect sac is transected near the deep ring, leaving the open distal sac in situ, as removing the whole indirect sac may increase the risks of bleeding, damaging spermatic cord structures, and prolonging the operation [6]. However, Leibl et al. [7] reported that transecting the indirect sac near the deep ring, leaving the open distal sac in situ, is also a risk factor for seroma formation, and that completely dissecting the hernial sac helps to expose the small end of the sac, enabling safe identification of the spermatic cord structures. No previous randomized controlled trial has compared complete dissection versus transection of the inguinal hernial sac, and reported the exact repercussions on postoperative seroma formation. The aim of the present study was to determine whether there was a correlation between transection of the hernial sac and seroma formation after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, and to compare the incidence of postoperative seroma formation after transection with complete dissection of the hernial sac.
Materials and methods
The present prospective, randomized, controlled study was conducted in a single surgical unit of the Department of General Surgery at the Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan. From May 2015 to September 2017, 159 consecutive adult male patients with primary indirect inguinal hernia who underwent laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair performed by an experienced surgeon were registered and randomly assigned to either the completely dissected group or the transected group. Randomization was achieved via random numbers generated using Excel software. The inclusion and exclusion criteria are listed in Table 1.
Demographic characteristics
The demographic characteristics of the patients were defined by the following variables: age, body mass index (BMI), hospital stay, comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, chronic constipation, and hypertension, use of anticoagulants, nicotine abuse, ASA classification, and hernia-related details including type, duration, and size measured during physical examination.
Preoperative management
Standard preoperative work-up for laparoscopic procedures was done, including chest radiography, electrocardiogram, routine blood tests, indicated pulmonary function testing, and nutritional instruction. Prophylactic antibiotics and urinary catheters were not used unless specifically indicated.
Operative technique
The whole procedure was a standardized transabdominal preperitoneal technique similar to that described by Krishna et al. [8]. Pneumoperitoneum up to 12 mmHg was created with CO2 using a Veress needle through a 10 mm cambered incision precisely located at the upper edge of the umbilicus, and a standard 10 mm trocar was placed 1 cm below the umbilicus for insertion of the 10 mm 30° laparoscope. Two extra 5 mm trocars were placed approximately horizontal on either side of the umbilicus at the lateral borders of the rectus abdominis muscle to form a triangulation. After the standardized and precise dissection, the size of the hernial sac and internal ring were measured with a rod under the laparoscope. The hernial sac was then either completely dissected from the spermatic cord and testicular vessels after parietalization (completely dissected group) or partially dissected and then transected (transected group). If a contralateral hernial sac was found, it was treated in the same way. After gentle blunt dissection, an appropriately sized space was created to accommodate a self-adhesive large-sized (10.3 cm × 15.7 cm) lightweight polypropylene mesh (Bard® 3D Max, no. 0117311 and 0117321) that had been preshaped to fit the defect perfectly; the mesh was rolled and introduced via the 10 mm umbilical port into the created space, and then unrolled to cover the entire myopectineal orifice on the hernia side(s) without fixation. The peritoneal flap was closed using 2–0 prolene in a continuous suture pattern (covering the mesh completely).
Postoperative assessment
Patients were given regular postoperative instructions on discharge, including using a compressive dressing for 10 days, resuming normal activity when able, and temporary abstinence from physical labor for 3 months.
The primary outcome of the present trial was the occurrence of seroma within 3 months after hernia repair. We prospectively followed up the patients at postoperative 7 days, 1 and 3 months, looking for signs or symptoms of seroma. Regular physical examination to diagnose seroma was performed at each follow-up visit by the same surgeon; ultrasound and CT scan were not used for seroma diagnosis. The duration of follow-up was extended to 6 months only when a seroma was still present at the 3 month postoperative follow-up examination. A prestructured form was designed to record seroma-related complications, treatments, seroma classification [9], and postoperative pain based on a visual analog scale where 0 indicated no pain and 10 indicated the worst pain imaginable; the time taken for the resumption of outdoor activity was also included. Univariate logarithmic regression analysis was carried out using SAS® (version 3.5.0), while the Statistical Package for Social Sciences software (SPSS®, version 24.0) was used for the rest of the statistical analyses.
Ethics approval
This registered clinical trial was approved by the local ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients for the whole procedure and for later publication of their personal data.
Results
After excluding 32 patients due to inadequate follow-up visits and missed appointments, a final total of 159 qualified patients were ultimately included. Patients who were not diagnosed with seroma at the first or second follow-up visits (at postoperative 7 days and 1 month) were not required to attend the third follow-up visit (at postoperative 3 months), and the clinical visits after 6 months were not included in the statistical analysis. Hence, the follow-up duration ranged from 1 to 6 months, and the average follow-up duration was 3.1 ± 0.7 months. There were 83 patients in the completely dissected group and 76 in the transected group. The classification system of Gilbert [10] was applied to describe the complexity of hernias in the present study, and the unpaired Students’ t-test showed that there were no significant differences between the two groups in any assessed parameter (Table 2).
The numbers of patients who developed postoperative seroma in the total group (including all 159 study participants), the completely dissected group, and the transected group were 20 (12.6%), 6 (7.2%), and 14 (18.4%), respectively; the χ2 test showed that there was a significant difference between the groups in the incidence of postoperative seroma formation (p = 0.034). The seroma occurrence, postoperative pain at each follow-up visit, and time taken for the resumption of outdoor activity in the two groups were analyzed using the Students’ t-test (Table 3). Of the 20 patients with seroma (Table 4), 17 (85.0%) were asymptomatic, and the seroma absorbed spontaneously within 3 months in 13 (65%). In the four asymptomatic patients with a seroma still present at 3 months postoperatively, aspiration was not used due to concerns regarding contamination; aspiration was needed for 2 patients in the completely dissected group because the bulges on the abdomen were unaltered in size, and for 1 patient in the transected group for whom the seroma caused substantial discomfort. In total, the seroma resolved within 6 months in 19 of 20 patients (95%), while 1 patient with obesity (BMI 35.3 kg/m2) in the completely dissected group had a persistent seroma at 6 months postoperatively that eventually resolved after several more aspirations (Fig. 1). No drainage was used in any patient. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the overall comparison of follow-up data from patients with seroma (Table 5). As most seromas did not cause further problems, the impact of seroma was analyzed by comparing the time taken for the resumption of outdoor activity and the postoperative pain of patients with seroma versus those without seroma; this analysis revealed that those with seroma reported a significantly greater degree of pain at postoperative 1 and 3 months than those without seroma (Table 6).
A univariate logarithmic regression analysis was performed to identify whether the development of seroma was correlated with factors such as age, BMI, hospital stay, comorbidities, ASA classification, hernia duration, hernia type, hernia size, hernial sac size, and operative time by comparing patients who developed postoperative seroma with those who did not. Significant correlations were found between seroma formation and age, BMI, use of anticoagulants, hernia type, hernia size, hernial sac size, and operative time (Table 7).
The mortality in the present series was 0%. No other seroma-related complications like hernia recurrence, infection, or mesh rejection occurred during the study period.
Discussion
There is currently no consensus on the best way of handling the inguinal hernial sacs, and even the exact cause of seroma is not yet completely understood; therefore, we decided to perform the present study. The overall occurrence of seroma in our research was 12.6% using diagnosis only via physical examination to identify a suspected bulge in the abdomen and/or fluid wave, especially when patients reported abdominal discomfort or tension on the skin. Susmallian et al. [11] suggested that when ultrasound instead of physical examination is used for diagnosis, seroma is detected in 100% of laparoscopic hernia repairs. The main reason that imaging techniques were not routinely used for seroma diagnosis in the present study was the concern that extra fees or tests would probably result in patients’ unwillingness to continue follow-up visits, leading to the eventual reduction of participants. Moreover, asymptomatic seroma found on ultrasound or CT scan does not have clinical significance. Despite the possibility that some seromas were undetected, having the same surgeon performing all of the physical examinations is a good way of minimizing variations in seroma diagnoses; hence, we consider that the present results are trustworthy.
In our trial, most seromas did not cause any further problems except for more pain, which is not what we usually consider a serious concern; however, the short duration of follow-up makes it impossible to assess the differences between the two groups in long-term outcomes. Due to the potential risk of unexpected consequences from seroma, many surgeons have created methods to decrease seroma formation. Daes [12] suggested that reduction and fixation of the distal sac high and laterally to the posterior inguinal wall would benefit patients with large inguinoscrotal hernias and sacs extending deep into the scrotum. Reddy et al. [13] reported that inverting the lax transversalis fascia by tacking it to the pubic ramus lowers the incidence of postoperative seroma formation in direct hernia repairs. Some other controversial ways suggested to reduce the incidence of seroma, such as placing suction drains or performing evacuating punctures, have been shown to be ineffective, because they failed to avoid the appearance of seroma and enhanced the risk of potential contamination [14]. No hernia repair performed in the present study involved the use of drainage or other therapeutic methods as measures to prevent seroma formation; the only factor that played a role in reducing seroma formation was the complete dissection of hernial sacs, which proved to be effective. When a hernial sac is transected and left in situ, increased exudation is more likely to happen, which accounts for the seroma formation.
Anticoagulants are reportedly one of the risk factors for seroma formation, as leakage of plasma fluid (serum) can be caused by anticoagulants [15]. The correlations that we found between seroma formation and age and BMI were similar to previous studies [8, 16]. In patients with obesity, the wound cavity is disproportionately enlarged, promoting seroma formation [17]. We also found correlations between seroma formation and hernia size, hernial sac size, and operative time. Hernias that are larger-sized or with the hernial sacs extending into the scrotum are more likely to result in seroma formation [8]. Furthermore, larger hernial sacs require a longer operative time and more extensive and substantial tissue disruption, increasing the risk of creating a space in which serum can accumulate. In agreement with our findings, Reddy et al. [18] suggested that the best way of preventing seroma formation was to handle the tissues as gently as possible, and to avoid creating any dead space in which a seroma could form. However, even before this, apart from performing complete dissection of the hernial sacs when the spermatic cord and other structures are secured, we would like to emphasize the importance of precise and blunt dissection, careful and clear identification of blood vessels, and minimizing the use of electrocoagulation, which contributes to less exudation, reducing seroma formation. Patients in the transected group with bilateral indirect hernias had both hernial sacs transected, and there was a significantly greater incidence of seroma formation in patients with bilateral versus unilateral hernia (p < 0.01); transection on both sides at least doubled the chance of seroma development after the hernia repair, which provides a simple explanation for the correlation between hernia type and seroma, indicating that transection does increase the risk of postoperative seroma formation.
Conclusion
Although seromas are generally considered acceptable and are thought to have no substantial impact on recovery [19], seroma can lead to unexpected complications such as infection, mesh removal, and even hernia recurrence in some cases. Hence, surgeons should still apply proper attention and effort to reducing seroma formation. Compared with complete dissection of the hernial sacs, transection leaves an open distal sac, carrying a greater risk of postoperative seroma formation, despite no clinically significant differences being detected in our study. To reduce seroma formation, indirect hernial sacs need to be dissected as completely as possible, while protecting the important structures from injury.
References
Cihan A, Ozdemir H, Ucan BH, Acun Z, Comert M, Tascilar O, Cesur A, Cakmak GK, Gundogdu S (2006) Fade or fate. Seroma in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 20:325–328
Edwards C, Angstadt J, Whipple O, Grau R (2005) Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: postoperative antibiotics decrease incidence of seroma related cellulites. Am Surg 71:931–935
Sodergren MH, Swift I (2010) Seroma formation, method of mesh fixation in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair—highlights of a case series. Scand J Surg 99:24–27
Bittner R, Arregui ME, Bisgaard T, Dudai M, Ferzli GS, Fitzgibbons RJ, Fortelny RH, Klinge U, Kockerling F, Kuhry E, Kukleta J, Lomanto D, Misra MC, Montgomery A, Morales-Conde S, Reinpold W, Rosenberg J, Sauerland S, Schug-Paß C, Singh K, Timoney M, Weyhe D, Chowbey P (2011) Guidelines for laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal Hernia [International Endohernia Society (IEHS)]. Surg Endosc 25:2773–2843
Simons MP, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nilsen M, Boullot L, Campanelli G, Conze J, Lange D, Fortelny R, Heikkinen T, Kingsnorth A, Kukleta J, Morales-Conde S, Nordin P, Schumpelick V, Smedberg S, Smietansky M, Weber G, Miserez M (2009) European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia 13:343–403
Lau H, Lee F (2003) Seroma following endoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty incidence and risk factors. Surg Endosc 17:1773–1777
Leibl BJ, Schmedt CG, Kraft K, Ulrich M, Bittner R (2000) Scrotal hernias: a contraindication for an endoscopic procedure? Results of a single-institution experience in transabdominal preperitoneal repair. Surg Endosc 14:289–292
Asuri Krishna MC, Misra VK, Bansal S, Kumar S, Rajeshwari Chabra A (2012) Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) approach: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 26:639–649
Morales-Conde S (2012) A new classification for seroma after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Hernia 16(3):261–267
Gilbert AI (1989) An anatomic and functional classification for diagnosis and treatment of inguinal hernia. Am J Surg 157(3):331
Susmallian S, Gewurtz G, Ezri T, Charuzi I (2001) Seroma alter laparoscopic repair of hernia with PFE match: is it really a complication? Hernia 5:139–141
Daes J (2014) Endoscopic repair of large inguinoscrotal hernias: management of the distal sac to avoid seroma formation. Hernia 18:119–122
Reddy VM, Sutton CD, Bloxham L, Garcea G, Ubhi SS, Robertson GS (2007) Laparoscopic repair of direct inguinal hernia: a new technique that reduces the development of postoperative seroma. Hernia 11:393–396
Suarez-Artacho G, Morales-Conde S, Socas M, Barranco A (2013) Influence of fibrin sealant in preventing postoperative seroma and normalizing the abdominal wall after laparoscopic repair of ventral hernia. Surg Endosc 27:3214–3219
Kadakol AK, Nypaver TJ, Lin JC, Weaver MR, Karam JL, Reddy DJ, Haddad GK, Shepard AD (2011) Frequency, risk factors, and management of perigraft seroma after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 54(3):637–643
Tomita K, Yano K, Masuoka T, Matsuda K, Takada A, Hosokawa K (2007) Postoperative seroma formation in breast reconstruction with latissimus dorsi flaps: a retrospective study of 174 consecutive cases. Ann Plast Surg 59:149–151
Klink CD, Binnebösel M, Lucas AH, Schachtrupp A, Grommes J, Conze J, Klinge U, Neumann U, Junge K (2011) Serum analyses for protein, albumin and IL-1-RA serve as reliable predictors for seroma formation after incisional hernia repair. Hernia 15:69–73
Reddy HK, Ujwala J, Swetha M, Ramya SB (2014) Seroma: an interesting case report. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 3:254–257
Aravind B, Cook A (2015) Intra-abdominal giant infected seroma following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 19:795–797
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Ph.D. student Alim Dayim for performing logarithmic regression analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosures
Rexiati Ruze, Zhibo Yan, Qunzheng Wu, Hanxiang Zhan, and Guangyong Zhang all have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ruze, R., Yan, Z., Wu, Q. et al. Correlation between laparoscopic transection of an indirect inguinal hernial sac and postoperative seroma formation: a prospective randomized controlled study. Surg Endosc 33, 1147–1154 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6374-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6374-y