Choledocholithiasis has been reported in up to 18 % of patients undergoing cholecystectomy [1]. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogram and endoscopic sphincterotomy (ERCP-ES) are widely performed in most hospitals as first-line treatment [2]. In contrast, as stated in current national and international guidelines [3, 4], LBDE (preferably by the transcystic route) is the gold-standard technique for the management of choledocholithiasis with gallbladder in situ (if the expertise is available) over ERCP-ES followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy due to its lesser morbidity, hospital stay and cost [511]. Cystic duct (CD) size, stone size and the presence of impacted stones are factors favouring choledochotomy over the transcystic approach, and impacted stones are the main reason of failure of the technique. Holmium laser lithotripsy use has been already reported, with good results, for impacted CBD stone fragmentation in short series [1214]. In this study, we describe our experience in the laparoscopic management of impacted and large biliary stones using holmium laser. To our knowledge, this is the largest reported series of laparoscopic holmium laser lithotripsy for choledocholithiasis.

Materials and methods

Patient selection

All patients admitted to our institution under the senior author (AI) with choledocholithiasis, gallstone pancreatitis or symptomatic cholelithiasis, and the suspicion of CBD stones are considered for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC). LBDE is performed if choledocholithiasis is present. Since February 2014, laparoscopic holmium laser lithotripsy has been considered if routine basket retrieval was not possible because of impacted stones or when the size was too large for routine transcystic extraction.

Six patients were referred after failed ERCP with biliary stent insertion. One had a previous cholecystectomy. Twelve patients were admitted from the emergency department and referred to our unit for specialised single-stage surgical management on diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. One patient required cholecystostomy before laparoscopic holmium laser lithotripsy for severe acute cholecystitis.

Surgical technique

All patients underwent the formal informed consent process in line with our institution and National Medical Council guidelines. Additionally, all laser techniques were performed in a laser suitable theatre by experts officially trained in using the holmium laser in the operative field. All laser technology had undergone safety checks and been approved for use in human procedures. All precautionary steps were applied for the use of lasers in the operative environment.

All cases were performed in accordance with our previously described technique [14]. Our preferred technique is a transcystic approach to the bile duct, currently used in more than 75 % of our cases. Three main factors influenced our decision to perform choledochotomy in 5 patients in this series: (1) the diameter of the CD, (2) the stone size and (3) the presence of a CBD stricture.

Inclusion criteria for the use of laser lithotripsy were the presence of impacted CBD stones after unsuccessful retrieval attempts with Dormia basket, or a large non-impacted stone found through a transcystic approach unable to be extracted through the CD.

For the lithotripsy, a 200- to 365-µm holmium laser fibre (Optical Integrity ScopeSafe™) was introduced through the choledochoscope. After security measurements, the generator is initially set at 0.5 J and 5 Hz, and its frequency may then be increased according to the consistency of the stone. The coloured diode targets the point of the stone where the laser should be activated (Fig. 1). The stone is then fragmented (Fig. 2) until it can be extracted from the bile duct or through the cystic duct using a Dormia basket, or is small enough to be flashed down to the duodenum with the help of the water irrigation. In addition, the choledochoscope can be passed through the ampulla obtaining the view of the duodenum to reassure the surgeon that good drainage has been achieved. Once clearance of the biliary tree has been accomplished, if the transcystic route is not used, we favour primary closure of the choledochotomy with a 5/0 polyglactin running suture. A drain is left in place, and it is removed in 24 h. When the transcystic approach is performed, the cystic duct is tied using an endoloop or transfixed using a 3/0 polyglactin suture without the need of a drain.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Red diode targeting intrahepatic impacted stone (Color figure online)

Fig. 2
figure 2

Holmium laser CBD stone fragmentation

Patients are routinely kept in hospital overnight and discharged the following day.

Results

Over a period of 26 months, between February 2014 and June 2016, eighteen patients [10 males; mean age 53 (21–84)] underwent LABEL procedure (Table 1). Over the same period, a total of 87 LBDE were performed in our institution. The diameter of the CBD varied from 8 to 24 mm (mean 13.3 mm). The number of stones ranged from 1 to 5 with a median diameter of 10.3 mm (5–20 mm). All procedures were accomplished laparoscopically. A transcystic approach was performed in 14 patients, whereas 5 patients underwent choledochotomy. Both approaches were used in one patient (the only unsuccessful laser lithotripsy stone retrieval) due to the choledocholithiasis being beyond an inflammatory CBD stricture unable to be passed by the scope. Closure over a T-tube was decided in this case to alleviate biliary obstruction, and the procedure was completed with a postoperative ERCP confirming the stricture. Sphincterotomy was performed, the three stones retrieved and a biliary stent placed. The T-tube was uneventfully removed after normal T-tube cholangiogram (Fig. 3) 1 month after the procedure and, at this time, the stricture had settled.

Table 1 Patient characteristics
Fig. 3
figure 3

A Pre-ERCP T-tube cholangiogram. Arrow shows CBD stricture. B Post-ERCP T-tube cholangiogram. Stricture settled

In one case (patient 14), four large stones were found within the CBD, and the Dormia basket became lodged during a standard transcystic basket removal. This was managed by removing the Dormia handle and then the basket from the scope followed by a transcystic laser fragmentation of the impacted stone within the basket, allowing the release of the Dormia basket. The remaining 3 stones were also fragmented to allow completion of the transcystic removal.

In another case (patient 11), the patient had undergone a previous cholecystectomy. In this case, we were unable to pass the papilla after successfully completing the laser lithotripsy of a large CBD stone. Due to the patient’s age (84 years) and the size of CBD (20 mm), a laparoscopic choledochoduodenostomy was decided to ensure adequate biliary drainage. The remaining 3 patients requiring choledochotomy underwent an uncomplicated primary closure without complications.

Five patients underwent preoperative placement of a biliary stent, 3 of whom had the stent removed during surgery. The remaining 2 patients underwent endoscopic removal of the stent postoperatively.

There was no mortality, and no reoperations were required. No patients had retained stones, and there have been no recurrences to date. Postoperative complications were observed in 2 patients. The first was a 71-year-old patient with hypertension and atrial fibrillation who developed pulmonary oedema that resolved with diuretics (Clavien–Dindo I). The second was an 84-year-old patient who underwent choledochoduodenostomy. This was complicated with an episode of maelena that was treated conservatively (Clavien–Dindo II); his overall length of stay was 30 days.

The mean postoperative stay was 5.3 days (1–30). Patients undergoing surgery via a transcystic approach were discharged earlier (mean length of stay (LOS) was 2.3 days) than those undergoing choledochotomy (mean LOS was 13 days) (p = 0.0025).

Discussion

Laser lithotripsy has been widely used for ureteric stones with high success and a low complication rate [16, 17]. Different lasers are currently used for stone fragmentation: KTP:YAG, LBO:YAG, diode lasers, holmium:YAG and thulium:YAG lasers [18], but holmium laser lithotripsy has the advantage of increased flexibility, which improves the access to previously unreachable areas, and its visible diode facilitates targeting stones with minimal collateral damage [19, 20]. The good outcomes achieved with the use of lasers in urological procedures prompted their adoption in the treatment of biliary stones. First described by Orii et al. [21], laser lithotripsy was initially used to fragment intrahepatic and choledochal stones using a choledochoscope through a T-tube or percutaneous transhepatic fistula.

In the present era, treatment of choledocholithiasis classically includes ERCP, which forms the standard technique in most hospitals [2]. In our institution, we favour single-stage laparoscopic management of choledocholithiasis and gallstone pancreatitis in the case of concomitant biliary stones [22], in accordance with the current National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines for gallstone disease [3]. After its introduction in 1998, our management of access and closure of the CBD evolved from choledochotomy and closure over a T-Tube into a choledochorraphy over an anterograde biliary endoprosthesis. This technique was later abandoned due to a high incidence of stent-related pancreatitis [15, 23, 24]. Currently, our preferred technique for CBD closure when choledochotomy is performed is primary choledochorraphy using a running 5/0 polyglactin suture [15]. In recent years, we are increasingly favouring the transcystic route (>75 % of cases) due to its excellent safety profile and the availability of 3-mm choledochoscopes. Furthermore, the advantages of single-stage management and the use of a transcystic approach in terms of lower hospital stay, need of fewer procedures, reduced bile leak, lower overall complication rate and a decrease in hospital costs have now been reported by a number of groups [511].

Despite technical improvements over our 326 case experience of LBDE, impacted stones (both intrahepatic and in the distal bile duct) had remained the main cause of procedural failure before the introduction of the laser [25]. Similar to reports from other groups [26, 27], we have also found the presence of large-sized stones to be the main reason for choledochotomy after failure of the transcystic approach. The LABEL procedure now allows impacted CBD stones to be fragmented into smaller pieces, which may then either be grabbed by the Dormia basket or passed through the ampulla, with the help of water irrigation. As a consequence, we are now able to perform transcystic extraction in the majority of cases.

Holmium laser lithotripsy can be used for the management of impacted CBD stones either endoscopically, percutaneously or surgically [1214, 2831]. It may also be applied to facilitate complicated mechanical stone extraction. The advantage of laparoscopic holmium laser lithotripsy is that it reduces the number of the choledochotomies required by fragmenting CBD stones into small pieces that may be mechanically retrieved transcystically. The availability of 3-mm choledochoscopes has facilitated increased uptake of this technique as these may more easily be passed through the cystic duct.

The only technical limitation of the holmium laser lithotripsy encountered in our series was the presence of a CBD inflammatory stricture, where we were unable to pass the choledochoscope to reach the impacted distal CBD stone. This was not seen in the preoperative MRCP; otherwise, intraoperative balloon dilatation would have been planned preoperatively. Finally, after choledochotomy and closure over a T-tube, choledocholithiasis was removed by ERCP and the inflammatory stricture settled.

Conclusions

To our knowledge, this is the largest reported series of laparoscopic holmium laser lithotripsy for biliary calculi. These results demonstrate the feasibility and reproducibility of the technique once experience for LBDE is gained. Holmium laser lithotripsy increases facilitates a transcystic approach, reduces failure related to impacted biliary stones and may also be used in cases of complicated mechanical extraction. As such, we believe that there is now a role for a more widespread uptake of LABEL procedure in the first-line management of impacted CBD stones.