Abstract
Background: Previous studies have shown that surgical repair of paraesophageal hernias is associated with a high recurrence rate, especially when a laparoscopic approach is used. Anatomic recurrence due to crura breakdown is a primary etiology, which has led us to employ prosthetic mesh reinforcement of large hiatal defects (> 5 cm) since 1996. We discuss the evolution of this approach and describe our current technique with limited outcomes in 52 consecutive patients during a 5-year period. Methods: There were 31 males and 21 females, with a mean age of 57 years (range, 32–77 years) with symptomatic reflux and endoscopic or radiologic evidence of a large paraesophageal hernia. Utilizing a laparoscopic approach, the contents of the sac were reduced and the crura approximated with permanent interrupted sutures and a prosthetic mesh was secured over the repair as an on-lay reinforcement buttress. A Nissen (42) or Tilley (9) fundoplication was performed in all but 1 patient, and 18 patients (34%) required a wedge collis gastroplasty. Fifteen patients (28%) had a previous unsuccessful antireflux operation. Results: There was no perioperative morbidity or mortality. Follow-up averaged 25 months (range, 7–60 months). Postoperative gastroscopy or barium swallow have been performed in 27 patients to date, with 11 experiencing foregut symptoms. There has been 1 recurrence (1.9%) and no prosthetic erosion. Conclusion: Early results suggest that prosthetic mesh cruroplasty may be effective in reducing recurrence after laparoscopic repair of large paraesophageal hernias, but long-term follow-up is required in all patients to determine the true incidence of anatomic recurrence and prosthetic erosion.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Champion, J., Rock, D. Laparoscopic mesh cruroplasty for large paraesophageal hernias. Surg Endosc 17, 551–553 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-8817-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-8817-7