Abstract
Neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChR) are ligand-gated ion channels that consist of various subunits. During ontogeny, muscular and neuronal nAChR undergo changes in the distribution and subunit composition in skeletal muscle and brain, respectively. Here, we have investigated the occurrence of the ligand-binding α-subunits of neuronal nAChR by means of reverse transcription/polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry in the rat heart during prenatal and postnatal development and after capsaicin-induced sensory denervation. mRNAs coding for the α4, α5, α7 and α10 subunits were detected throughout all developmental stages. Messenger coding for the α2 subunit was first detectable at developmental stage E20; α3 subunit mRNA was expressed throughout all prenatal developmental stages, whereas it was restricted postnatally to the atria. mRNA for α6 was observed at E14-P8 but was absent thereafter. At no developmental stage could an unequivocal signal for α9 nAChR subunit mRNA be obtained. The expression pattern was unchanged by capsaicin treatment. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated α7 subunits on cardiac neurons, fibroblasts and cardiomyocytes and α2/4 subunits on cardiomyocytes with a postnatal redistribution to intercalated discs, as shown by cryo-immunoelectron microscopy. Our results indicate an additional non-neuronal expression of nAChR subunits in the rat heart that, as in skeletal muscle, precedes functional innervation and then undergoes changes in its distribution on the surface of cells.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChR) are ligand-gated ion channels with a pentameric structure and a central pore with a cation gate. They consist of various subunits. To date, 17 nAChR subunit genes that encode both neuronal and skeletal muscle nAChRs have been cloned from vertebrates (Sargent 1993; Lukas et al. 1999; Elgohyen et al. 2001). In skeletal muscle, this receptor is classified into two types, a junctional type consisting of four different subunits, i.e. α1, β1, δ and ε, in adult muscle, and an extrajunctional type in embryonic and adult denervated muscle, in which an γ subunit replaces the ε subunit (Mishina et al. 1986; Brehm and Henderson 1988; Karlin 1993; Duclert and Changeux 1995). By contrast, the neuronal types of nAChR consist of different arrangements of α2–α10 and β2–β4 subunits (Lukas et al. 1999; Elgohyen et al. 2001), among which the α8 subunit has been described only in chick (Schoepfer at al. 1990). These receptors have been detected in neurons of the central and peripheral nervous system and, additionally, in several non-neuronal cell types including skeletal muscle fibres (Chini et al. 1992; Sargent 1993; Corriveau et al. 1995; Grando et al. 1995; Elgohyen et al. 2001; Brüggmann et al. 2003). During ontogeny, nAChRs as a population undergo changes in their distribution, subunit composition, and function in the nervous system (Margiotta and Gurantz 1989; Zoli et al. 1995; Winzer-Serhan and Leslie 1997; Charpantier et al. 1999) and in skeletal muscle (Corriveau et al. 1995; Brehm and Henderson 1988; Fischer et al. 1999).
To date, limited data are available concerning the expression of these genes in the various cell types of rat heart. Cultured rat intracardiac neurons express α2–α9 and β2–β4 subunits (Poth et al. 1997) and electrophysiological and pharmacological data indicate that functional α7 nAChRs also operate in these neurons in situ (Cuevas and Berg 1998; Ji et al. 2002). In the present study, we have investigated the expression of nAChR α-subunits in rat heart during prenatal and postnatal development by reverse transcription/polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and immunohistochemistry. Our results indicate an additional non-neuronal expression of nAChR subunits, with particular expression of subunits α2, α4 and α7 in ventricles; immunohistochemistry has revealed their occurrence on cardiomyocytes.
The distribution of nAChRs in skeletal muscle development undergoes changes that are linked with innervation (Frank and Fischbach 1979) and that have been suggested to be at least partially governed by agrin, an extracellular matrix protein, and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP; Fontaine et al. 1987; Nitkin et al. 1987; Daniels 1997). Moreover, CGRP-receptors are present on cardiomyocytes (Dvorakova et al. 2003). We have therefore asked whether similar mechanisms may also operate in the heart. To this end, we have treated animals with capsaicin to deplete hearts of sensory nerve fibres that are the only known source of agrin and CGRP in the rat heart (Stone and Nikolics 1995; Wharton et al. 1986).
Materials and methods
Animals
All animals used in this study were cared for in accordance with the guidelines published in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals by the National Institutes of Health. Timed pregnant Wistar rats, with the day of mating defined as embryonic day 0 (E0), were killed by chloroform inhalation and the embryos removed at E14, E16, E18 and E20. The hearts from the embryos were frozen in liquid nitrogen (for RNA isolation) and in isopentane (for immunofluorescence). Rats at postnatal day (P) 1, P3, P8 and P30 and adult rats (body weight higher than 250 g) were killed by chloroform inhalation and their hearts were excised. Atria and ventricles were processed separately and frozen in liquid nitrogen. Seven to nine animals were used for each developmental stage. For cryo-immunoelectron microscopy, three adult rats were killed by inhalation of halothane and transcardially perfused with rinsing solution (Forssmann et al. 1977) followed by 4% paraformaldehyde/0.1% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphated buffer, pH 7.4. Segments of heart ventricle were dissected, incubated for 4 h in fixative, washed in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer and cryoprotected in 1.9 M sucrose in 0.1 M phosphate buffer for 16 h and in 2.3 M sucrose for 24–48 h. Specimens were frozen in liquid nitrogen.
Additionally, rats were treated with capsaicin (Sigma, Deisenhofen, Germany) in two doses at P1 and P2 (total dose: 100 mg/kg) and controls were injected with the vehicle (10% ethanol and 10% Tween 80 diluted in physiological saline solution (0.9% NaCl; all reagents Sigma) alone (Nagy et al. 1983). Rats at P3, P8 and P10 and adult rats (body weight >250 g) were killed by decapitation and their hearts were quickly removed. Atria and ventricles were separated and the ventricles were treated as described above. Eight animals were investigated at each time point.
RT-PCR procedure
Total RNA was isolated from four to five hearts per developmental stage by using RNazol (WAK-Chemie, Bad-Homburg, Germany) following the protocol of the manufacturer. Total RNA was then treated with DNase I (Life Technologies, Karlsruhe, Germany) in the presence of 20 mM TRIS–HCl (pH 8.4), 2 mM MgCl2 and 50 mM KCl for 15 min at 25°C. Single-stranded cDNA was synthesised from 1 μg total RNA in 20 μl superscript synthesis buffer containing 3 mM MgCl2, 75 mM KCl, 50 mM TRIS–HCl (pH 8.3), 10 mM dithiothreitol, 2.5 mM each of dNTP (Life Technologies), 0.5 μg oligo(dT) primer (MWG Biotech, Ebersberg, Germany) and 200 U of Superscript RNase H- reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies) for 50 min at 42°C. PCR amplification was conducted in 25 μl PCR buffer II containing 1 μl or 2 μl cDNA, 2 μl MgCl2, 0.625 μl dNTPs (6.25 mM each), 0.25 μl AmpliTaq Gold polymerase (all reagents from Applied Biosystems, Überlingen, Germany) and 0.625 μl each primer (12.5 pM). The primers were designed to amplify the sequence corresponding to the published rat cDNA sequence for the α2–α7, α9 and α10 nAChR subunits (Table 1). The efficiency of RNA isolation and PCR was tested with primers for glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH; (Table 1). RNA isolated from rat brain was used as a positive control. Reactions without template were included as negative controls. The PCR amplification products were separated by 2.0% agarose gel electrophoresis.
Immunofluorescence
Three to four hearts per developmental stage were cut on a cryostat (Jung Frigocut 1900E, Leica, Bensheim, Germany). Sections (8 μm thick) were placed onto gelatinised slides, fixed for 10 min in acetone and air-dried. Sections were covered for 1 h with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 10% normal porcine serum, 0.1% bovine serum albumin and 0.5% Tween 20 to saturate unspecific binding sites. Immunofluorescence was performed with a goat antiserum raised against the α2/4 nAChR subunit (1:20, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, Calif., USA) and a mouse monoclonal antibody against the α7 nAChR subunit (1:400, clone mAb 306, Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany). Primary antibodies were applied overnight at 4°C, followed by washing steps (2×10 min in PBS) and a subsequent 1-h incubation with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labelled donkey anti-mouse-IgG (1:80, Dianova, Hamburg, Germany) or mouse anti-goat-IgG conjugated to FITC (1:80, Sigma). Thereafter, slides were washed in PBS and coverslipped in carbonate-buffered glycerol at pH 8.6. To establish the specificity of α2/4 nAChR immunolabelling, the antibody was preabsorbed overnight with its corresponding antigen (20 μg/ml diluted serum; antigen from Santa Cruz Biotechnology) prior to immunolabelling. Application of non-related isotype (IgG1)-matched mouse immunoglobulin served as a specificity control for the mouse monoclonal α7 subunit antibody. Immunolabelling was evaluated on an epifluorescence microscope (BX 60F, Olympus, Hamburg, Germany) equipped with appropriate filter combinations.
Cryo-electron microscopy
Ultrathin cryosections were cut at 100 nm (Reichert Ultracut S equipped with a Reichert FC R cryo chamber; Leica, Mannheim, Germany) and transferred to 100-mesh nickel grids (Plano, Wetzlar, Germany). Sections were washed (4×5 min) in 0.05 M PBS and then incubated for 20 min with 100% normal porcine serum and for 90 min with goat-anti-α2/4 antibody (1:20, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). After being washed in PBS, sections were incubated with colloidal gold-conjugated (5 nm, Sigma) rabbit anti-goat-Ig in 10% normal porcine serum and washed again in PBS. The sections were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M PBS for 5 min, counterstained, embedded with 0.3% uranyl acetate in 2% methylcellulose (10 min at 4°C) and viewed with a EM 902 transmission electron microscope (Zeiss, Jena, Germany). The specificity of the secondary antiserum was validated by incubation without the primary antiserum.
Results
RT-PCR procedure
Nicotinic AChR α-subunit expression was studied in the rat heart during prenatal and postnatal development. Additionally, postnatal stages from rats neonatally treated with capsaicin to cause sensory denervation were investigated. The developmental expression profile of neuronal α-subunits of nAChRs in the rat heart is presented in Fig. 1. Messenger RNA coding for the α2 nAChR subunit was first detectable at developmental stage E20; α3 nAChR subunit mRNA was present in the hearts of all prenatal developmental stages investigated, whereas postnatally it was demonstrated solely in the atria. The mRNAs coding for α4, α5, α7 and α10 nAChR subunits were detected throughout all developmental stages. The mRNA for α6 nAChR was observed at developmental stages E14-P3. At P8, α6 nAChR subunit mRNA was still detectable in atria but not in ventricles and was absent in atria and ventricles of developmental stage P30 and older. At no developmental stages could an unequivocal signal for α9 nAChR subunit mRNA be obtained. No obvious difference in α-subunit nAChR composition was found between hearts from vehicle-treated animals and those treated with capsaicin to induce sensory denervation (Fig. 2).
Immunohistochemistry
In view of the prominent expression of subunits α2, α4 and α7 in ventricles that lacked neuronal cell bodies, antisera recognising these subunits were employed for immunohistochemistry to unravel their tissue distribution.
Immunoreactivity for the α2/4 nAChR subunit
Cardiomyocytes displayed immunoreactivity at all developmental stages with no obvious differences between the individual chambers of the heart (Fig. 3). In the prenatal and early postnatal stages (E14-P8), α2/4-nAChR-immunoreactive spots formed clusters arranged in cross-striations (Fig. 3e). These clusters were less prominent in later postnatal stages (P30, adult rat) in which immunolabelling was redistributed to the intercalated discs (Fig. 3f, g). This localisation was confirmed at the electron-microscopical level (Fig. 4). In addition to labelling of cardiomyocytes, α2/4 nAChR staining of smooth muscle cells of the coronary arteries was observed (Fig. 3f, g), whereas, consistent with a previous report (Brüggmann et al. 2003), smooth muscle cells of large elastic arteries (aorta, truncus pulmonalis) remained unlabelled (data not shown). No specific labelling of cardiac ganglionic neurons and nerve fibre bundles was observed (Fig. 5a).
Differences in the tissue distribution of immunoreactivity for the α2/4 nAChR subunit after capsaicin treatment were not noticed (data not shown).
Immunoreactivity for the α7 nAChR subunit
Cardiomyocytes exhibited immunoreactivity for subunit α7 at all developmental stages, although an age-related decline in the intensity of the immunostaining was noted postnatally (Fig. 6). Smooth muscle cells of coronary arteries also showed immunolabelling (Fig. 6f) as did cardiac ganglionic neurons (Fig. 5b). Throughout the heart, additional cells were labelled that probably represented fibroblasts (Fig. 6c).
Differences in the tissue distribution of immunoreactivity for the α7 nAChR subunit after capsaicin treatment were not noticed (data not shown).
Discussion
The present study establishes the expression of multiple nAChR subunits in various tissue components of the developing rat heart. Previous studies have focused on the parasympathetic cardiac ganglia in which fast synaptic transmission is mediated via acetylcholine and nAChRs, demonstrating the α-subunits 2, 3, 4, 5 and 7 by means of RT-PCR with respect to neurons cultured from these ganglia of 2- to 7-day-old rats (Poth et al. 1997) and immunoreactivity to α-subunit 3 and 7 in canine cardiac neurons (Bibevski et al. 2000). These data and electrophysiological findings have revealed the heterogeneous expression pattern of nAChR subunits among individual neurons (Poth et al. 1997; Bibevski et al. 2000). Similarly, we have not observed α2/4 immunoreactivity in nerve cell bodies, whereas each neuron is immunolabelled by the α7 antibody. The main new aspect of the present study is that, in addition to these ganglionic receptors, multiple nAChR α-subunits also occur on non-neuronal cells of the heart. At all postnatal stages, the atria and ventricles have been separately processed for RT-PCR and, from this time point on, subunit α3 has been detected in atria only, while subunits α2, α4, α5 and α7 appear to be expressed both in atria and in ventricles. This suggests an exclusive expression of α3 in cardiac neurons, which are overwhelmingly located in the atria of the rat heart (Pardini et al. 1987; Richardson et al. 2003), and both expression studies and electrophysiological data have pointed to a predominant role of α3-containing nAChRs in ganglionic transmission (Poth et al. 1997; Bibevski et al. 2000). Moreover, α6 mRNA has been detected only in atria at P8. This subunit forms heteropentamers together with α3-subunits and β2-subunits (Gerzanich et al. 1997; Fucile et al. 1998; Kuryatov et al. 2000) and, thus, may be an assembly partner of α3 in prenatal and early postnatal ganglia. Since α3α6β2 heteropentamers exhibit a reduced potency to acetylcholine compared with α3β2 heteropentamers (Fucile et al. 1998; Kuryatov et al. 2000), the cessation of α6 expression after the first postnatal week may be the cause of the facilitation of ganglionic cholinergic transmission at this time point (Slavikova and Tucek 1982). On the other hand, the sustained ventricular presence of α2, α4, α5, α7 and α10 indicates a non-neuronal expression of these subunits; this could be verified by immunohistochemistry, in that immunoreactivity for both the α2/4-subunit and the α7-subunit has been detected on vascular smooth muscle cells and cardiomyocytes. Cardiac muscle labelling is most prominent, especially at early developmental stages, and hence the following discussion will focus on nAChRs on cardiomyocytes.
Developing cardiac muscle cells express multiple nAChR α-subunits before a functional innervation is established. As early as E14, mRNAs coding for the α-subunits 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 10 have been detected by RT-PCR and cardiomyocytes are immunoreactive for subunits α2/4 and α7. This developmental stage is the youngest age at which the first ganglia appear in the right atrial wall, whereas the first nerve endings near myocardial cells are not detected earlier than E15 by light microscopy (Gomez 1958). Immunohistochemically, cholinergic parasympathetic and sensory CGRP-immunoreactive nerve terminals are first detected in the myocardium at E15 and E19, respectively (Franco et al. 1997; Shoba and Tay 2000) and the first electrophysiological evidence for a functional cholinergic innervation can be found at P3 (Quigley et al. 1996). Hence, the onset of nAChR gene expression in the developing rat heart is neither triggered by cholinergic innervation nor by neurally released CGRP. In this aspect, the heart parallels skeletal muscle in which myotubes start to express nAChR subunit genes before the first neurites arrive (for a review, see Sanes and Lichtman 2001). Subsequently, however, functional innervation resulting in electrical activity and the release of agrin and CGRP increases the synthesis of nAChR subunits in skeletal muscle cells and leads to a clustering of α1-subunit containing nAChRs in the postjunctional membrane (Sanes and Lichtman 2001). At first sight, a striking resemblance can be seen to the situation found in the heart, since we have observed a redistribution of immunoreactive α2/4-subunits at the surface of cardiomyocytes after the first postnatal week, i.e. the period in which maturation of the cholinergic innervation occurs (Quigley et al. 1996). Some notable differences are however present in the redistribution mechanisms between skeletal and cardiac muscle. (1) In skeletal muscle, a direct contact of the motor nerve terminal with the basal lamina of the myotube has to be formed to induce these changes (Sanes and Lichtman 2001), whereas this is certainly not the case in the rat heart, at least not in the ventricles, which are sparsely innervated by cholinergic fibres (Schäfer et al. 1998). (2) Induced clustering of nAChRs is strictly localised to the postjunctional membrane in skeletal muscle fibres (Sanes and Lichtman 2001), whereas cardiac α2/4-subunits are redistributed from spots and striations at the surface of the cardiomyocytes to the intercalated discs.
Furthermore, we could not find any evidence for a significant involvement of the neuropeptide CGRP in the regulation of cardiac nAChRs, in that chemical destruction of CGRP-containing nerve fibres by capsaicin application altered neither the α-subunit composition determined by RT-PCR nor the postnatal redistribution of α2/4-subunits to intercalated discs. Moreover, by destroying CGRP-containing sensory neurons, capsaicin also depletes the only known source of the heparan sulphate proteoglycan agrin in the heart (Stone and Nikolics 1995); this is essential for the maintenance of postjunctional nAChR aggregation in skeletal muscle (Gautam et al. 1996; Lin et al. 2001).
In conclusion, the non-neuronal expression of nAChR in the rat heart, like that in skeletal muscle, precedes functional innervation and then undergoes changes in its distribution on the surface of cells.
References
Bibevski S, Zhou Y, McIntosh JM, Zigmond RE, Dunlap ME (2000) Functional nicotinic acetylcholine receptors that mediate ganglionic transmission in cardiac parasympathetic neurons. J Neurosci 20:5076–5082
Brehm P, Henderson LP (1988) Regulation of acetylcholine receptor channel function during development of skeletal muscle. Dev Biol 129:1–11
Brüggmann D, Lips KS, Pfeil U, Haberberger RV, Kummer W (2003) Rat arteries contain multiple nicotinic acetylcholine receptor α-subunits. Life Sci 72:2095–2099
Charpantier E, Besnard F, Graham D, Sgard F (1999) Diminution of nicotinic receptor alpha 3 subunit mRNA expression in aged rat brain. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 118:153–158
Chini B, Clementi F, Hukovic N, Sher E (1992) Neuronal-type alpha-bungarotoxin receptors and the alpha 5-nicotinic receptor subunit gene are expressed in neuronal and nonneuronal human cell lines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:1572–1576
Corriveau RA, Romano SJ, Conroy WG, Oliva L, Berg DK (1995) Expression of neuronal acetylcholine receptor genes in vertebrate skeletal muscle during development. J Neurosci 15:1372–1383
Cuevas J, Berg D (1998) Mammalian nicotinic receptors with α7 subunits that slowly desensitize and rapidly recover from a-bungarotoxin blockade. J Neurosci 18:10335–10344
Daniels MP (1997) Intracellular communication that mediates formation of the neuromuscular junction. Mol Neurobiol 14:143–170
Duclert A, Changeux JP (1995) Acetylcholine receptor gene expression at the developing neuromuscular junction. Physiol Rev 75:339–368
Dvorakova M, Haberberger RV, Hagner S, McGregor GP, Slavikova J, Kummer W (2003) Expression and distribution of the calcitonin receptor-like receptor in the developing rat heart. Anat Embryol 207:307–315
Elgohyen AB, Vetter DE, Katz E, Rothlin CV, Heinemann SF, Boulter J (2001) Alpha10: a determinant of nicotinic cholinergic receptor function in mammalian vestibular and cochlear mechanosensory hair cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:3501–3506
Fischer U, Reinhardt S, Albuquerque EX, Maelicke A (1999) Expression of functional alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor during mammalian muscle development and denervation.Eur J Neurosci 11:2856-2864
Fontaine B, Klarsfeld A, Changeux JP (1987) Calcitonin gene-related peptide and muscle activity regulate acetylcholine receptor alpha-subunit mRNA levels by distinct intracellular pathways. J Cell Biol 105:1337–1342
Forssmann WG, Ito S, Weihe E, Aoki A, Dym M, Fawcett DW (1977) An improved perfusion fixation method for the testis. Anat Rec 188:307–314
Franco D, Moorman AF, Lamers WH (1997) Expression of the cholinergic signal-transduction pathway components during embryonic rat heart development. Anat Rec 248:110–120
Frank E, Fischbach GD (1979) Early events in neuromuscular junction formation in vitro: induction of acetylcholine receptor clusters in the postsynaptic membrane and morphology of newly formed synapses. J Cell Biol 83:143–158
Fucile S, Matter JM, Erkman L, Ragozzino D, Barabino B, Grassi F, Alema S, Ballivet M, Eusebi F (1998) The neuronal alpha6 subunit forms functional heteromeric acetylcholine receptors in human transfected cells. Eur J Neurosci 10:172–178
Gautam M, Noakes PG, Moscoso L, Rupp F, Scheller RH, Merlie JP, Sanes JR (1996) Defective neuromuscular synaptogenesis in agrin-deficient mutant mice. Cell 85:525–535
Gerzanich V, Kuryatov A, Anand R, Lindstrom J (1997) “Orphan” alpha6 nicotinic AChR subunit can form a functional heteromeric acetylcholine receptor. Mol Pharmacol 51:320–327
Gomez H (1958) The development of the innervation of the heart in the rat embryo. Anat Rec 130:53–71
Grando S, Horton R, Pereira E, Diethelm B, Okita P, George PM, Albuquerque EX, Conti-Fine B (1995) A nicotinic acetylcholine receptor regulating cell adhesion and motility is expressed in human keratocytes. J Invest Dermatol 105:774–781
Ji S, Tosaka T, Whitfield BH, Katchman AN, Kandil A, Knollmann BC, Ebert SN (2002) Differential rate responses to nicotine in rat heart: evidence for two classes of nicotinic receptors. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 301:893–899
Karlin A (1993) Structure of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Curr Opin Neurobiol 3:299–309
Kuryatov A, Olale F, Cooper J, Choi C, Lindstrom J (2000) Human α6 AchR subtypes: subunit composition, assembly, and pharmacological responses. Neuropharmacology 39:2570–2590
Lin W, Burgess RW, Dominguez B, Pfaff SL, Sanes JR, Lee KF (2001) Distinct roles of nerve and muscle in postsynaptic differentiation of the neuromuscular synapse. Nature 410:1057–1064
Lukas RJ, Changeux JP, Le Novere N, Albuquerque EX, Balfour DJK, Berg DK, Bertrand D, Chiappinelli VA, Clarke PBS, Collins AC, Dani JA, Grady SR, Kellar KJ, Lindstrom JM, Marks MJ, Quik M, Taylor PW, Wonnacott S (1999) International Union of Pharmacology. XX. Current status of the nomenclature for nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and their subunits. Pharmacol Rev 51:397–401
Margiotta JF, Gurantz D (1989) Changes in the number, function, and regulation of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors during neuronal development. Dev Biol 135:326–339
Mishina M, Takai T, Imoto K, Noda M, Takahashi T, Numa S, Methfessel C, Sakmann B (1986) Molecular distinction between fetal and adult forms of muscle acetylcholine receptor. Nature 321:406–411
Nagy JI, Iversen LL, Goedert M, Chapman D, Hunt SP (1983) Dose-dependent effects of capsaicin on primary sensory neurons in the neonatal rat. J Neurosci 3:399–406
Nitkin RM, Smith MA, Magill C, Fallon JR, Yao YM, Wallace BG, McMahan UJ (1987) Identification of agrin, a synaptic organizing protein from Torpedo electric organ. J Cell Biol 105:2471–2478
Pardini BJ, Patel KP, Schmid PG, Lund DD (1987) Location, distribution and projections of intracardiac ganglion cells in the rat. J Auton Nerv Syst 20:91–101
Poth K, Nutter TJ, Cuveas J, Parker MJ, Adams DJ, Luetje CW (1997) Heterogeneity of nicotinic class and subunit mRNA expression among individual parasympathetic neurons from rat intracardiac ganglia. J Neurosci 17:586–596
Richardson RJ, Grkovic I, Anderson CR (2003) Immunohistochemical analysis of intracardiac ganglia of the rat heart. Cell Tissue Res 314:337–350
Quigley KS, Shair HN, Myers MM (1996) Parasympathetic control of heart period during early postnatal development in the rat. J Auton Nerv Syst 56:75–82
Sanes JR, Lichtman JW (2001) Induction, assembly, maturation and maintenance of a postsynaptic apparatus. Nat Rev Neurosci 2:791–805
Sargent PB (1993) The diversity of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Annu Rev Neurosci 16:403–443
Schäfer MK, Eiden LE, Weihe E (1998) Cholinergic neurons and terminal fields revealed by immunohistochemistry for the vesicular acetylcholine transporter. II. The peripheral nervous system. Neuroscience 84:361–376
Schoepfer R, Conroy WG, Whiting P, Gore M, Lindstrom J (1990) Brain alpha-bungarotoxin binding protein cDNAs and Mabs reveal subtypes of this branch of the ligand-gated ion channel gene superfamily. Neuron 5:35–48
Shoba T, Tay SS (2000) Nitrergic and peptidergic innervation in the developing rat heart. Anat Embryol 201:491–500
Slavikova J, Tucek S (1982) Postnatal changes of the tonic influence of the vagus nerves on the heart rate, and of the activity of choline acetyltransferase in the heart atria of rats. Physiol Bohemoslov 31:113–120
Stone DM, Nikolics K (1995) Tissue- and age-specific expression patterns of alternatively spliced agrin mRNA transcripts in embryonic rat suggest novel developmental roles. J Neurosci 15:6767–6778
Wharton J, Gulbenkian S, Mulderry PK, Ghatei MA, McGregor GP, Bloom SR, Polak JM (1986) Capsaicin induces a depletion of calcitonin gene-related protein (CGRP)-immunoreactive nerves in the cardiovascular system of the guinea pig and rat. J Auton Nerv Syst 16:289–309
Winzer-Serhan UH, Leslie FM (1997) Codistribution of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit alpha 3 and beta 4 mRNAs during rat brain development. J Comp Neurol 386:540–554
Zoli M, LeNovere N, Hill JA Jr, Changeux JP (1995) Developmental regulation of nicotinic ACh receptor subunit mRNAs in the rat central and peripheral nervous systems. J Neurosci 15:1912–1939
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Mr. M. Bodenbenner, Ms. T. Papadakis, Ms. S. Pfreimer and Ms. K. Michael for skilful technical assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by the DFG (LI 1051/1-1 to K.S.L. and GK 543 to W.K.), the Czech Science Foundation (GACR 305/03/D180 to M.D.) and the Erwin-Stein-Stiftung (to M.D.)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dvorakova, M., Lips, K.S., Brüggmann, D. et al. Developmental changes in the expression of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor α-subunits in the rat heart. Cell Tissue Res 319, 201–209 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-004-1008-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-004-1008-1