Abstract
To understand the mechanisms of aluminum (Al) tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), suppression subtractive hybridization (SSH) libraries were constructed from Al-stressed roots of two near-isogenic lines (NILs). A total of 1,065 putative genes from the SSH libraries was printed in a cDNA array. Relative expression levels of those genes were compared between two NILs at seven time points of Al stress from 15 min to 7 days. Fifty-seven genes were differentially expressed for at least one time point of Al treatment. Among them, 28 genes including genes for aluminum-activated malate transporter-1, ent-kaurenoic acid oxidase-1, β-glucosidase, lectin, histidine kinase, and phospoenolpyruvate carboxylase showed more abundant transcripts in Chisholm-T and therefore may facilitate Al tolerance. In addition, a set of genes related to senescence and starvation of nitrogen, iron, and sulfur, such as copper chaperone homolog, nitrogen regulatory gene-2, yellow stripe-1, and methylthioribose kinase, was highly expressed in Chisholm-S under Al stress. The results suggest that Al tolerance may be co-regulated by multiple genes with diverse functions, and those genes abundantly expressed in Chisholm-T may play important roles in enhancing Al tolerance. The down-regulated genes in Chisholm-S may repress root growth and restrict uptake of essential nutrient elements, and lead to root senescence.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Aluminum (Al) toxicity is the major limiting factor for crop productivity in acid soils, which comprise about 40% of world arable lands (Conner and Meredith 1985). Fortunately, plants with different levels of tolerance to Al toxicity have been found in several species, which provides a useful base for crop improvement and for exploring mechanisms of Al tolerance in plant species (Anoop et al. 2003; Garvin and Carver 2003). Two major mechanisms were previously established for plant tolerance to Al toxicity: internal and exclusion mechanisms (Taylor 1991; Delhaize et al. 1993). The internal mechanism reduces Al toxicity by immobilization, compartmentalization, or detoxification of Al ions that have penetrated into plant cells, whereas the exclusion mechanism enhances plant tolerance to Al stress by preventing Al ions from entering the root apex cells. Central to the exclusion mechanism is that root tips secrete organic acids such as malate, citrate, or oxalate to chelate Al3+ in the rhizosphere (Ryan et al. 2001; Kochian et al. 2004).
A number of over-expressed genes under Al stress were reported from different plant species, including those regulating the organic acid pathway featuring citrate synthase gene (de la Fuente et al. 1997; Anoop et al. 2003; Garvin and Carver 2003), or the anti-oxidant pathway with genes for superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase (Richands et al. 1998; Milla et al. 2002), pathogen defense such as genes for β-1,3-glucanase and phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (Snowden and Gardner 1993; Cruz-Ortega et al. 1997), signal transduction such as cell wall-associated receptor kinase 1 (WAK1) gene (Sivaguru et al. 2003), and the general stress-responsive pathway such as blue copper-binding protein gene (Richards et al. 1998; Milla et al. 2002). However, most of these genes can also be induced by other biotic and abiotic stresses. Furthermore, identification of these genes was based on comparison of gene expression levels of a single genotype under Al-stressed versus non-stressed conditions, or between two genotypes with different genetic backgrounds under Al-stressed conditions.
More recently, a gene encoding a wheat Al-activated malate transporter (ALMT1) has been isolated using the suppression subtractive hybridization (SSH) approach (Sasaki et al. 2004). Transgenic barley plants with this gene conferred Al-activated efflux of malate and showed a high level of Al tolerance (Delhaize et al. 2004). Mapping analysis indicated that ALMT1 was located on chromosome 4DL (Ma et al. 2005; Raman et al. 2005). However, Al tolerance can assume different forms of resistance, as would be expected for what is considered a complex trait (Pellet et al. 1996). For example, in the well-studied wheat cultivar, Atlas 66, Al permeates the plasma membrane and accumulates in the root tips (Samuels et al. 1997). Beside one major QTL on chromosome 4DL, three additional QTLs located on 5AS, 2DL, and 7AS were identified to contribute to Al-tolerance in Chinese Spring (Ma et al. 2006). Therefore, that malate release may not be the only mechanism for Al tolerance in wheat leaves open the prospect for identifying candidate genes other than ALMT1. The objectives of this study were to identify genes that are differentially expressed between two wheat near-isogenic lines (NILs) contrasting in Al tolerance under Al stress by using SSH and microarray techniques. Based on putative function of the identified genes, we elucidated possible mechanisms of Al tolerance in wheat.
Materials and methods
Growth conditions and Al-tolerance evaluation
Wheat cultivar Atlas 66 (Al-tolerant) and two near isogenic-lines (NILs, Chisholm-S, and Chisholm-T) were used in this study. Chisholm-T (Al-tolerant) and Chisholm-S (Al-sensitive) were developed from selected BC3-derived NILs of Chisholm (Al-sensitive), with Al tolerance from Atlas 66 (Carver et al. 1993). Wheat seeds were sterilized with 0.5% NaOCl for 10 min, rinsed extensively with deionized water for 10 min, and germinated on wet filter paper in petri dishes at 23°C for 1 day, before they were transferred to polyethylene cups lined with nylon net on the bottom. Seedlings were grown in an aerated hydroponics nutrient-culture system for seedling growth. The cups were allowed to float on the surface of the nutrient solution in a 12-liter plastic container in a controlled growth chamber with a 16/8 h photoperiod regime at 24°C (day) and 20°C (night). The nutrient solution contained 5 mM CaCl2, 6.5 mM KNO3, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM (NH4)2SO4, and 0.4 mM NH4NO3 (Polle et al. 1978) and was replaced with fresh solution daily. Four-day-old seedlings were treated with 0–15 mg/l Al3+ by adding AlK(SO4)2 into the culture solution. The pH of the culture solution was adjusted to 4.2 with 0.1 N HCl after addition of AlK(SO4)2.
Ten representative seedlings of Atlas 66, Chisholm-S, and Chisholm-T were selected daily to measure the elongation rate of the primary root under different Al treatments during a 7-day period. Relative root growth (RRG) was calculated as the ratio of mean root length in the Al treatment to mean root length in the control (0 mM Al) treatment.
RNA isolation and SSH cDNA library construction
Total RNA and mRNA were isolated and purified from wheat root tips by using Trizol reagent and the MessageMaker kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), respectively. The SSH cDNA libraries were constructed from root tips of Chisholm-T and Chisholm-S, receiving the 10 mg/l Al3+ treatment for 6 h and for 1 day using the PCR-select cDNA subtraction kit (Clontech Laboratories Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Forward subtraction was conducted by using the tester (the mRNA of Chisholm-T) subtracted against the driver (mRNA of Chisholm-S) and vice versa for the reverse subtraction. Subtracted cDNAs were subjected to two rounds of PCR to normalize cDNA populations. The PCR products were ligated into pGEM-T Easy Vector (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and transferred into Escherichia coli DH5α competent cells. The positive clones were regrown and stored at a -80°C freezer. The analysis of unigenes and function categories for all sequences were carried out through PipeOnline 2.0 (Ayoubi et al. 2002).
cDNA microarray preparation
Universal M13 primers were used to amplify the inserts of selected clones by using bacterial cultures as templates with a PCR profile of 40 cycles of 45 s at 94°C, 45 s at 53°C, and 1 min at 72°C. The PCR products were examined in an agarose gel, and clones with only a single band were selected. PCR products from selected clones were purified by ethanol precipitation and dissolved in 3× SSC buffer for printing. A total of 1,628 cDNAs from the SSH libraries were arrayed onto Corning GAPS II slides coated with amino-silane (Corning Inc. Corning, NY, USA) using the Generation III Array Spotter (Amersham Biosciences Corp., Piscataway, NJ, USA). Wheat actin gene and pGEM-T easy vector (Promega) were also printed onto slides as an internal quality control. Actin gene was amplified with forward primer (5′-CTGGACTCACACCTTCTACAACGAGCTCCGTGT-3′) and reverse primer (5′-ATCCAGACACTGTACTTCCTT-3′) according to Xu et al. (2002). After printing, the slides were baked at 80°C for 3 h and stored in a desiccator at room temperature.
Microarray analysis
RNA was isolated from the root tips of Chisholm-S and Chisholm-T at 0, 15 min, 1, 3, 6 h, 1, 3, and 7 days after 10 mg/l of Al3+ exposure by using Trizol reagent (Invitogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The 3DNA Array 50™ Expression Array Detection Kit (Genisphere, Hatfield, PA, USA) was used to detect differentially expressed genes between Chisholm-S and Chisholm-T after Al stress according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Microarray probes were synthesized from equal amounts of total RNA isolated from the roots of Chisholm-S and Chisholm-T at different time points. Biological replications were made for all time points, and dye swap analysis was applied between two repeated samples to avoid bias in dye intensity detection. cDNA hybridizations were conducted at 48°C overnight in a Corning hybridization chamber (Corning Inc.). After washing, 3DNA hybridization was performed at 48°C for 3 h to incorporate Cy5 or Cy3 fluorochrome. The slide was washed for 12 min with pre-warmed buffer containing 2× SSC and 0.1% SDS, followed by 10 min with 2× SSC and 10 min with 0.2× SSC at room temperature. The slide was dried by low-speed centrifuge and stored in a light proof box until scanned. The fluorescent signals of Cy5 and Cy3 were captured through ScanArray™ Express scanner (PerkinElmer Inc., Boston, MA, USA) at a resolution of 10 μm per pixel. Scanning parameters were adjusted to obtain balanced signal intensities in both channels using the line-scan function. Signal intensity data were quantified using GenePix Pro 4.0 (Axon Instrument, Union city, CA, USA), and were normalized with Loess within-print-tip-group intensity-dependent normalization using R-project statistical environment (http://www.r-project.org) and Bioconductor (http://www.bioconductor.org). Any spot with poor quality data and signal intensity less than 200 in both channels was filtered out. After normalization, the signal ratios of log2-fold changes for the actin gene and pGEM-T vector were around zero or not detectable, indicating that the results from the microarray experiment were reliable. However, a stronger signal for Cy5 was found tightly associated with several genes in this study as shown in the self-versus-self and dye swap hybridizations (Supplemental Table 2). This phenomenon could result from specific sequences bound by 3DNA dendrimer (http://www.genisphere.com); thus, those genes were excluded from further analysis.
Differential fold-cutoff was determined by self-versus-self hybridization, in which the same RNA was labeled with both Cy3 and Cy5 and hybridized to the same cDNA array. After normalization, the ratios of log2-fold changes ranged from -0.595 to 0.595 (Supplemental Fig. 1). Thus, differential expression was considered to be significant if an average ratio of log2-fold was greater than 0.595 or less than -0.595. Selected differentially expressed genes were subjected to KMC clustering analysis using Genesis 1.5 (Graz University of Technology, http://www.genome.tugraz.at).
Quantitative real-time PCR
To validate the results from the microarray experiment, specific primers (Supplemental Table 3) for selected differentially expressed genes were designed for a 100 bp amplicon with T m at 58–59°C. First-strand cDNA was synthesized from 2.0 μg of total RNA using SuperScript II RNase H- Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Real-time RT PCR was performed in an ABI Prism 7700 DNA analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster, CA, USA) using the QuantiTect SYBR green PCR kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) for signal detection. To normalize the total amount of cDNAs present in each reaction, a housekeeping gene of 40S ribosomal protein S8 was co-amplified. Its expression between Chisholm-T and Chisholm-S was similar during various time courses of Al stress. The RT-PCR primers designed for all genes used in this study were evaluated for PCR amplification efficiencies by performing real-time PCR using a series dilution of each cDNA at rates of 1/2, 1/5, 1/10, 1/20, 1/50, and 1/100 as described in Applied Biosystems User Bulletin No. 2 (http://www.docs.appliedbiosystems.com/pebiodocs/04303859.pdf). The efficiency test showed that all the primers amplified the genes with approximately the same efficiency as that of the normalizer 40S ribosomal protein S8. The ΔΔCT method of relative gene quantification recommended by Applied Biosystems was used to calculate the expression level of Chisholm-T relative to Chisholm-S.
Results
Effect of Al on root growth
Inhibition of root growth is a major symptom of Al toxicity. The two NILs, Chisholm-S and Chisholm-T, and Atlas 66, the donor of Al tolerance in these lines, showed significant differences in root growth across Al concentrations (Fig. 1). In general, inhibition of root growth, as a proportion of the control, gradually increased with increasing Al3+ concentrations in the growth medium. RRG was lowest in Chisholm-S (Fig. 1a), equaling 15, 9, and 4% at 5, 10, and 15 mg/l of Al3+, respectively. Chisholm-T showed slightly lower RRG than Atlas 66 at the highest Al concentration but substantially higher than Chisholm-S at all Al concentrations.
For all genotypes, root elongation dramatically decreased on the first day of exposure to 10 mg/l Al3+ (Fig. 1b). Root elongation of Atlas 66 and Chisholm-T was about 50% of the control on the first day of Al exposure, and then about 40% on the second day. Root elongation remained constant in Atlas 66 with subsequent exposure, but Chisholm-T was not able to maintain the same growth as Atlas 66, decreasing to 30% RRG on day 4 of Al exposure and thereafter. On the other hand, root elongation of Chisholm-S was only about 10% of the control at 1 day of Al3+ exposure, decreasing to about 5% of the control by day 4 of Al3+ exposure (Fig. 1b). High-Al concentration and extended exposure significantly limited root growth of both NILs compared with Atlas 66, but the growth-rate reduction was different between the NILs.
Identification of differentially expressed genes
After subtractive hybridization of root cDNAs between the NILs at 6 and 24 h of Al exposure, a total of 1,628 cDNA clones (788 from Chisholm-T and 840 from Chisholm-S) were isolated with an average fragment size of 587 bp ranging from 400 to 700 bp. After contig analysis for all the ESTs using PipeOnline 2.0 (Ayoubi et al. 2002), 1,065 putatively unique genes were identified. Their sequences were compared with the NCBI database using Blastx, then grouped based on putative function using PipeOnline 2.0.
Approximately 63% of the genes were either unclassified or had no match (“no hit”) in the database (Table 1). The largest group (17%) of genes with known function was involved with intermediate metabolism and bioenergetics (e.g., carbohydrate, lipid, protein, and nucleic acids metabolism), and the second most abundant group (8%) of genes was involved in information pathways crucial to DNA replication, mRNA transcription, protein biosynthesis, and stress response. A small proportion of genes was involved in transmembrane transport, signal transduction, electron transport, cell structure, and cell function.
Of the 1,065 genes, microarray analysis identified 57 genes that were differentially expressed between the NILs for at least one of seven time points of Al exposure (Table 2). Among them, 28 genes each showed a higher expression level in either of the two NILs and only one gene (non-symbiotic hemoglobin) showed differential expression alternately in the NILs. The difference in relative gene expression level between the two NILs varied from -2.31 to 2.34 of log2-fold among time points (Supplemental Table 1). Interestingly, abundant transcripts of ALMT1 and jasmonate-responsive gene (JRG1) were detected in Chisholm-T and Chisholm-S, respectively, before Al stress; therefore (Table 2, Supplemental Table 1), ALMT1 and JRG1 were most likely expressed constitutively.
To validate the microarray results, ten differentially expressed genes were selected for real-time RT PCR analysis. Although the microarray log2-fold values were lower than the corresponding values from the real-time RT PCR values, their high concordance (r 2 = 0.95) indicated that cDNA microarray analysis effectively identified differentially expressed transcripts with sufficient sensitivity (Fig. 2).
Differentially expressed genes in response to Al stress
The 57 differentially expressed genes identified from microarray analysis were grouped into six clusters according to their NIL × Al time course expression patterns (Table 2; Fig. 3). Clusters A, B, and C represented groups of genes that were highly expressed in Chisholm-T for at least one time point of Al exposure. Genes in clusters D, E, and F were abundantly expressed in Chisholm-S. Hence, genes in clusters A, B, and C may serve to enhance Al tolerance, whereas genes in cluster D, E, and F may associate with sensitive reactions to Al toxicity.
Genes in cluster A, which encode ALMT1, putative lectin (HL2), β-glucosidase aggregating factor (BGAF), ent-kaurenoic acid oxidase 1 (KAO1), and β-glucosidase, were abundantly expressed in Chisholm-T at most time points of Al exposure. These five genes appear to have a predominant and consistent presence in enhancing Al tolerance in Chisholm-T. Most of the 15 genes in cluster B showed abundant transcripts in Chisholm-T after 1–3 h Al exposure. Genes with known function in this cluster are related to signal transduction, H+-efflux/influx of membrane, defense response, and organic acid metabolism. Differential expression of genes in cluster C occurred with prolonged Al exposure (1–7 days). These genes encode several proteins such as lipid transfer protein-like proteins, δ-tonoplast intrinsic protein (δ-TIP), cytochrome P450-like protein, and sucrose synthase 1 (SuSy 1).
Genes in cluster D mainly showed abundant transcripts in Chisholm-S at 6 h or 7 days of Al stress. Half of those genes had no match in the NCBI and TIGR databases (The Institute for Genomic Research), and the others encode NADP-specific isocitrate dehydrogenase, isovaleryl-CoA dehydrogenase (IVD), putative transporter and formin homology protein interacting protein 1. Most of the genes in cluster E again were abundantly expressed in Chisholm-S, but during early time points (from 15 min to 6 h) of Al exposure. Genes in cluster F showed more abundant transcripts in Chisholm-S at most time points. Genes in the last two clusters mainly encode several ABC transporters, acyl-CoA oxidase (ACX1), subtilisin-chymotrypsin inhibitor 2, β-amylase, or they relate to uptake and metabolism of nitrogen, sulfur, iron, and copper.
Discussion
Genes related to organic acid exudation
The exudation of organic acids from root apexes to chelate Al3+ is one means for plants to protect themselves against Al damage (Ryan et al. 2001; Kochian et al. 2004). ABC transporters were suggested as an anion channel for organic acid exudation (Ryan et al. 2001). In this study, several ion transporter genes were identified. Among them, ALMT1 was expressed more abundantly in both Al-stressed and unstressed root tips of Chisholm-T than Chisholm-S (Table 2, Supplemental Table 1), suggesting that it most likely expresses constitutively. These results are in good agreement with the finding of Sasaki et al. (2004) and add further support that some wheat cultivars might gain their Al tolerance by activating a pre-existing specific Al-dependant transporter to initiate rapid malate efflux (Ma et al. 2001). However, the level of ALMT1 expression was also significantly enhanced at 3 and 6 h of Al exposure in comparison with the non-stressed controls (data not shown). This result is in agreement with Li et al. (2000) that malate efflux significantly increased in Atlas 66 from 2 to 6 h of Al exposure, indicating that Al could activate even higher levels of ALMT1 expression.
Unlike ALMT1, several different transporter genes, especially ABC transporter genes identified in cluster E, were abundantly expressed in Chisholm-S under Al stress (Fig. 3, Table 2 and Supplemental Table 1). It was previously reported that ABC transporters were regulated by stress conditions and mediated ion channel activity, detoxification, stomatal movement, and plant development (Alvarado et al. 2004). They are also involved in pathogen defense (Stukkens et al. 2005). However, the ABC transporter genes highly expressed in this study were unique in the susceptible NIL. Thus, they appear not to mediate tolerance but instead to indicate sensitivity to Al stimulation. Their role in transporting other substrates besides malate remains to be investigated.
Precisely how wheat regulates organic acid efflux from root apexes in response to Al stress remains a mystery. Takita et al. (1999) reported that organic acid exudation was associated with changes in enzyme activities for organic acid metabolism; however, Li et al. (2000) concluded that activities of phospoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC), malate dehydrogenase, citrate synthase, and NADP-dependant isocitrate dehydrogenase (NADP-ICDH) did not associate with malate efflux of root apexes under Al stress. Ma et al. (2001) suggested that enzyme activity for malate biosythesis might not be the limiting factor; malic acid might be replenished by activating pre-existing enzymes. In this study, PEPC transcripts were more abundant in Chisholm-T than in Chisholm-S at 3 h of Al exposure. In contrast, NADP-ICDH was highly expressed in Chisholm-S at 6 h of Al stress. Takita et al. (1999) also observed the down-regulation of this gene. These results indicate that Al stress may affect malate biosynthesis through regulating enzyme activities in the organic acid metabolic pathway in wheat, and could be further assumed that the malate level in Chisholm-T might be adjusted by PEPC in biosynthetic pathway.
The exudation of organic acids from root apexes should be accompanied by the release of cations or uptake of other anions to balance membrane potential. Citrate secretion in soybean under Al stress was associated with H+-ATPase activity, and proton efflux via H+-ATPase was suggested to play a role in balancing anion release (Shen et al. 2005). A high level of expression of vacuolar ATPase (V-ATPase) was also associated with Al tolerance in wheat cultivar “PT741”, and a homeostatic mechanism was suggested for V-ATPase to maintain the cytoplasmic pH-value during Al stress (Hamilton et al. 2001). In this study, a gene encoding plasma membrane H+-ATPase was highly expressed in Chisholm-T 3 h after Al stress, and ATP6V1G2 encoding a component of V-ATPase was more abundant in Chisholm-T at 1, 3 h, and 3 days after Al stress. Therefore, H+-ATPase and V-ATPase may equilibrate membrane potential during peak periods of malate efflux in Chisholm-T under Al stress.
Genes involved in root growth
Cytochrome P450s may serve as monooxygenases in the biosynthetic pathways for lignin, defense compounds, hormones, pigments, fatty acids, and signaling molecules, and in the detoxification pathway to catalyze numerous endogenous and exogenous toxic compounds encountered in the environment (Schuler and Werck-Reichhart 2003). In this study, transcripts for two P450s, KAO1 and cytochrome P450-like protein gene, were more abundantly expressed in Chisholm-T throughout Al exposure (Fig. 3 and Supplemental Table 1). KAO1 is a cytochrome P450 monooxygenase from the subfamily CYP88A, and it catalyzes the biosynthesis of gibberellin (GA) from ent-kaurenoic acid to GA12 (Davidson et al. 2003). In pea, mutant plants without KAO1 had dwarfed stature with reduced taproot length, and the reduction in growth corresponded with a decrease in GA levels in the shoot and root (Yaxley et al. 2001; Davidson et al. 2003). Similarly, KAO1 could facilitate root elongation of Chisholm-T under Al stress. The gene encoding cytochrome P450-like protein was also highly expressed in Chisholm-T at 6 h, 3, and 7 days of Al stress, but its function is still unknown.
Genes for β-glucosidase and BGAF were abundantly expressed in Chisholm-T with almost the same expression pattern throughout Al exposure. β-glucosidase (β-D-glucoside glucohydrolase, EC 3.2.1.21) catalyzes the hydrolysis of aryl and alkyl β-D-glucosides as well as glucosides with a carbohydrate moiety (Brzobohatý et al. 1993). It appears abundant in primordial tissues, affects cell wall catabolism, and influences phytohormone activation and root elongation by releasing active cytokinins, gibberellins, and indole acetic acid from their inert precursors of glucoconjugates (Nagahashi et al. 1990; Brzobohatý et al. 1993). Therefore, a high-expression level of β-glucosidase may help maintain a high rate of root growth in Chisholm-T under Al stress. In addition, many phenolic compounds appear as β-D-glucosyl conjugates in plants. These glucosides belong to several chemical families such as benzonic or hydroxycinnamic acids, and flavonoids (Duroux et al. 1998). The hydrolysis of these glycosides catalyzed by the glucosidase may release physiologically active phenolic compounds (Brzobohatý et al. 1993), which may detoxify Al3+ in plants by forming a strong complex with Al3+ intracellularly at near-neutral pH (Kochian et al. 2004). Active flavonoid-type phenolics released from their inactive form could be exuded from root apexes to the rhizosphere for Al3+ chelation (Kidd et al. 2001). Thus, β-glucosidase could play a protective role by releasing active phenolics to chelate toxic Al3+ in both the symplast and apoplast of roots. The protein BGAF binds directly to β-glucosidase, but its physiological function in plants is still unknown (Esen and Blanchard 2000). However, co-expression of BGAF and β-glucosidase suggests that BGAF may ameliorate physiological activity of β-glucosidase to maintain root growth and detoxify Al toxicity in Chisholm-T.
The gene δ-TIP2:1, encoding a TIP, was highly expressed in Chisholm-T at 1 day of Al stress. In rye, Al stress repressed TIP expression, which led to a reduction in root growth rate under Al stress by generating a lower turgor pressure in the cell elongation zone (Milla et al. 2002). Therefore, a high level of expression of δ-TIP2:1 in Chisholm-T may facilitate more rapid root elongation in Chisholm-T than in Chisholm-S after Al stress.
Defense responsive genes
Lectins are a group of carbohydrate-binding proteins abundant in plants. They bind glycans of glycoproteins, glycolipids, or polysaccharides with high affinity (Etzler 1985), and serve in plant defense, carbohydrate metabolism, and packaging of storage proteins (Peumans and Van Damme 1995). In this study, a high-light-induced gene (HL2) in barley, putatively encoding lectin, showed abundant transcripts in Chisholm-T at 1 h, 1, 3, and 7 days (Fig. 3). This result may suggest that this lectin functions as a passive-defense protein and its high expression in Chisholm-T may enable adaptation to Al-stressed environments.
Lipid transfer proteins (LTPs) facilitate transportation of lipids to the cell wall for biosynthesis of cutin layers and surface waxes of leaves as a defense mechanism in response to pathogen attack (Kader 1997). They can be induced by various abiotic stresses (Kader 1997; Trevino and O’Connell 1998) to increase cuticle thickness and prevent water loss of cells under stress (Trevino and O’Connell 1998). In this study, two genes encoding LTP-like proteins were highly expressed in Chisholm-T from 3 to 7 days of Al exposure. Increased expression of LTPs in Chisholm-T may increase cutin layer thickness and thereby protect root cells from Al damage.
Pathogen attack and wounding can induce Prx7, a barley stress-related peroxidase gene. This gene, which leads to the production of hordatines that in turn may have a role in cell wall biosynthesis (Kristensen et al. 1999), generated abundant transcripts in Chisholm-T after 1 h of Al exposure. The same expression pattern was observed for Prx63, another peroxidase gene that functions in disease resistance and wound response by lignification (Sottomayor et al. 2004). In addition, a gene encoding O-methyltransferase also had more transcripts in Chisholm-T after 1 h of Al exposure. This enzyme facilitates modulation under stress (NDong et al. 2003). SuSy is believed to function in channeling UDP-glucose from sucrose to various β-glucan synthases for cellulose biosynthesis. Its activity was positively correlated with cell wall biosynthesis (Klinge et al. 1997) and with cell wall thickening by cellulose deposition in roots in response to stress (Albrecht and Mustroph 2003). In this study, SuSy 1 was identified with high expression in Chisholm-T after 3 h and 7 days of Al exposure. These genes, combined, appear to offer protection to root cells against Al toxicity in Chisholm-T.
Genes for signal transduction
Although Sivaguru et al. (2003) reported that a cell WAK1 was rapidly induced by Al3+ stress and enhanced root growth, evidence to demonstrate that this gene is involved in Al tolerance is still limited (Kochian et al. 2004). Histidine kinase was reported to be involved in the perception and signal transduction of phosphate starvation, nickel toxicity, and high osmotic and salt stresses (Marin et al. 2003; Motoyama et al. 2005). In Chisholm-T, a spike in histidine kinase expression was detected at 1 h of Al exposure, but sharply declined thereafter (Fig. 3 and supplemental Table 1). Expression of this gene in Chisholm-T fits a typical “on-off” pattern; therefore, it may play an important role in perceiving Al3+ and switching on expression of other Al-tolerance related genes in Chisholm-T.
The ASR1 is an ABA- and stress-inducible gene that encodes a small plant-specific protein with a zinc-dependent DNA-binding activity (Kalifa et al. 2004). A high level of expression of this gene was reported when tomato plants were subjected to water and salt stresses (Kalifa et al. 2004). In this study, ASR1 was highly expressed in Chisholm-T only at 3 h of Al exposure, and may serve a signaling function in response to Al stress in Chisholm-T.
Al-responsive genes in Chisholm-S
The CYP72A26 belongs to the P450 family and its expression pattern was different from the other two P450 genes discussed previously. Abundant transcripts were instantaneously detected with Al exposure and maintained over various time points in Chisholm-S, indicating that it may be a sensitive-response gene to Al toxicity.
Genes encoding ACX1 and β-amylase were highly expressed in Chisholm-S across almost all time points of Al exposure (Fig. 3, Supplemental Table 1). ACX1 is an essential enzyme for fatty acid degradation in plants (Grossi et al. 2003). β-amylases are believed to be involved in starch degradation through hydrolysis of α-1,4-glucosidic linkages from the reducing ends of starch molecules (Beck and Ziegler 1989; Taiz and Zeiger 2002). In addition, more transcripts of a putative IVD were detected in Chisholm-S at 6 h of Al exposure. This enzyme catalyzes degradation of leucine and valine for energy metabolism following carbohydrate depletion, and it can be induced in carbohydrate-starved maize root (Faivre-Nitschke et al. 2001). These results imply that Al stress may set off a cascade of degradation reactions of fatty acids, amino acids, and starch in an Al-sensitive genotype.
A high level of expression of alternative oxidase 1 gene (AOX1) was detected in Chisholm-S at 1 and 6 h of Al stress. AOX is a quinol-oxygen oxidoreductase that can transfer electrons from ubiquinone to oxygen without proton translocation. The activity and content of AOX increased in aged roots of pea, or in plants under various stresses that inhibit mitochondrial respiration (Millar et al. 1998; Taiz and Zeiger 2002). This finding indicates that Al may inhibit the phosphorylating pathway of electron transport in roots of an Al-sensitive genotype.
High-expression levels of iron deficient induced gene 1 (IDI 1) and yellow stripe 1 gene were observed in Chisholm-S at 15 min and 1 h after Al exposure (Fig. 3 and Supplemental Table 1). IDI 1 is an enzyme involved in the Met cycle and is induced by Fe deficiency in barley roots (Negishi et al. 2002). Yellow stripe 1 is a transporter of an iron-phytosiderophore for iron uptake, and its transcripts were increased in roots under iron deficit (Schaaf et al. 2004). In rye, Milla et al. (2002) reported that Al caused rapid inhibition of Fe uptake and induced high levels of expression of iron deficiency-specific genes, Ids1, Ids3a, and Ids3b, which are responsible for phytosiderophore synthesis and iron uptake.
Similar effects of Al on metabolism of nitrogen, sulfur, and copper was also observed in this study. A nitrogen regulatory gene (nit-2) and a methylthioribose kinase gene (MTK1) were highly expressed in Chisholm-S during early exposure (15 min to 3 h) to Al (Fig. 3, Supplemental Table 1). MTK1 is involved in recycling of Met via the MTA cycle and is linked specifically to sulfur metabolism and strongly induced in roots and shoots under sulfur deficit (Sauter et al. 2004); nit-2 can elicit expression of various unlinked specific structure genes related to enzymes for nitrogen catabolism under nitrogen deficiency (Fu and Marzluf 1990). A copper chaperone homolog (CCH) gene was also detected with more abundant transcripts in Chisholm-S than in Chisholm-T at 15 min, 1, 6 h, and 1 d of Al stress (Fig. 3, Supplemental Table 1). CCH is a copper-dependant protein and may mediate intracellular copper homeostasis and mobilize copper from decaying tissues toward reproductive structures (Mira et al. 2001; Lee et al. 2005). It is induced under copper deprivation or during organ senescence (Lee et al. 2005). Combining these results, we can postulate that Al stress on Al-sensitive Chisholm-S may lead to deprivation of essential nutrient elements such as Fe, N, S, and Cu by inhibiting their uptake and utilization, leading to root senescence and inhibition.
References
Albrecht G, Mustroph A (2003) Localization of sucrose synthase in wheat roots: increased in situ activity of sucrose synthase correlates with cell wall thickening by cellulose deposition under hypoxia. Planta 217:252–260
Alvarado MC, Zsigmond LM, Kovacs I, Cseplo A, Koncz C, Szabados LM (2004) Gene trapping with firefly luciferase in Arabidopsis. Tagging of stress-responsive genes. Plant Physiol 134:18–27
Anoop VM, Basu U, McCammon MT, McAlister-Henn L, Taylor GJ (2003) Modulation of citrate metabolism alters aluminum tolerance in yeast and transgenic canola overexpressing a mitochondrial citrate synthase. Plant Physiol 132:2205–2217
Ayoubi P, Jin X, Leite S, Liu X, Martajada J, Abduraham A, Wan Q, Yan W, Misawa E, Prade RA (2002) PipeOnline 2.0: automated EST processing and functional data sorting. Nucleic Acids Res 30:4761–4769
Beck E, Ziegler P (1989) Biosynthesis and degradation of starch in higher plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 40:95–117
Brzobohatý B, Moore I, Kristoffersen P, Bako L, Campos N, Schell J, Palme K (1993) Release of active cytokinin by a beta-glucosidase localized to the maize root meristem. Science 262:1051–1054
Carver BF, Whitmore WE, Smith EL, Bona L (1993) Registration of four aluminum-tolerant winter wheat germplasms and two susceptible near-isolines. Crop Sci 33:1113–1114
Conner AJ, Meredith CP (1985) Strategies for the selection and characterization of aluminum-resitant variants from cell cultures of Nicotiana plumbaginifolia. Planta 166:466–473
Cruz-Ortega R, Cushman JC, Ownby J (1997) cDNA clones encoding 1,3-β-glucanase and a fimbrin-like cytoskeletal protein are induced by Al toxicity in wheat roots. Plant Physiol 114:1453–1460
Davidson SE, Elliott RC, Helliwell CA, Poole AT, Reid JB (2003) The pea gene NA encodes ent-kaurenoic acid oxidase. Plant Physiol 131:335–344
de la Fuente JM, Ramírez-Rodríguez V, Cabrera-Ponce JL, Herrera-Estrella L (1997) Aluminum tolerance in transgenic plants by alteration of citrate synthesis. Science 276:1566–1568
Delhaize E, Ryan PR, Hebb DM, Yamamoto Y, Sasaki T, Matsumoto H (2004) Engineering high-level aluminum tolerance in barley with the ALMT1 gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:15249–15254
Delhaize E, Ryan PR, Randall PJ (1993) Aluminum tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). II. Aluminum-stimulated excretion of malic acid from root apices. Plant Physiol 103:695–702
Duroux D, Delmotte FM, Lancelin JM, Keravis G, Jay-Allemand C (1998) Insight into naphthoquinone metabolism: β-glucosidase-catalysed hydrolysis of hydrojuglone β-D-glucopyranoside. Biochem J 333:275–283
Esen A, Blanchard J (2000) A specific β-glucosidase-aggregating factor is responsible for the β-glucosidase null phenotype in Maize. Plant Physiol 122:1–10
Etzler ME (1985) Plant lectins: molecular and biological aspects. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 36:209–234
Faivre-Nitschke SE, Couee I, Vermel M, Grienenberger JM, Gualberto JM (2001) Purification, characterization and cloning of isovaleryl-CoA dehydrogenase from higher plant mitochondria. Eur J Biochem 268:1332–1339
Fu Y, Marzluf GA (1990) nit-2, the major positive-acting nitrogen regulatory gene of Neurospora crassa, encodes a sequence-specific DNA-binding protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:5331–5335
Garvin DF, Carver BF (2003) Role of genotypes tolerant of acidity and aluminum toxicity. In: Rengel Z (ed) Handbook of soil acidity. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, pp 387–406
Grossi M, Giuntini P, Mazzucotelli E, Crosatti C, Pistelli L, De Bellis L, Alpi A, Stanca AM, Cattivelli L (2003) Cloning and characterization of barley long chain acyl-CoA oxidase and its possible regulation by glucose. Physiol Plant 117:22–32
Hamilton CA, Good AG, Taylor GJ (2001) Induction of vacuolar ATPase and mitochondrial ATP synthase by aluminum in an aluminum-resistant cultivar of wheat. Plant Physiol 125:2068–2077
Kader JC (1997) Lipid-transfer proteins: a puzzling family of plant proteins. Trends Plant Sci 2:66–70
Kalifa Y, Gilad A, Konrad Z, Zaccai M, Scolnik PA, Bar-Zvi D (2004) The water- and salt-stress-regulated Asr1 (abscisic acid stress ripening) gene encodes a zinc-dependent DNA-binding protein. Biochem J 381:373–378
Kidd PS, Llugany M, Poschenrieder C, Gunse B, Barcelo J (2001) The role of root exudates in aluminium resistance and silicon-induced amelioration of aluminium toxicity in three varieties of maize (Zea mays L.). J Exp Bot 52:1339–1352
Klinge B, Lange T, Werr W (1997) The IBP genes of maize are expressed in non-meristematic, elongating cells of the seedling and in abortive floral organs. Mol Gen Genet 255:248–257
Kochian LV, Hoekenga OA, Piñeros MA (2004) How do crop plants tolerate acid soils? Mechanisms of aluminum tolerance and phosphorous efficiency. Annu Rev Plant Biol 55:459–493
Kristensen BK, Bloch H, Rasmussen SK (1999) Barley coleoptile peroxidases, molecular cloning, purification and induction by pathogens. Plant Physiol 120:501–512
Lee H, Lee JS, Bae EK, Choi YI, Noh EW (2005) Differential expression of a poplar copper chaperone gene in response to various abiotic stresses. Tree Physiol 25:395–401
Li XF, Ma JF, Matsumoto H (2000) Pattern of aluminum-induced secretion of organic acids differs between rye and wheat. Plant Physiol 123:1537–1544
Ma H, Bai G, Zhou L, Carver B (2005) Molecular mapping of a quantitative trait locus for aluminum tolerance in wheat cultivar atlas 66. Theor Appl Genet 112:51–57
Ma H, Bai G, Lu W (2006) QTLs for aluminum tolerance in wheat cultivar Chinese spring. Plant Soil 283:239–249
Ma JF, Ryan PR, Delhaize E (2001) Aluminum tolerance in plants and the complexing role of organic acids. Trends Plant Sci 6:273–278
Marin K, Suzuki I, Yamaguchi K, Ribbeck K, Yamamoto H, Kanesaki Y, Hagemann M, Murata N (2003) Identification of histidine kinases that act as sensors in the perception of salt stress in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:9061–9066
Milla MAR, Butler E, Huete AR, Wilson CF, Anderson O, Gustafson JP (2002) Expression sequence tag-based gene expression analysis under aluminum stress in rye. Plant Physiol 130:1706–1716
Millar AH, Atkin OK, Menz RI, Henry B, Farquhar G, Day DA (1998) Analysis of respiratory chain regulation in roots of soybean seedlings. Plant Physiol 117:1083–1093
Mira H, Martinez-Garcia F, Penarrubia L (2001) Evidence for the plant-specific intercellular transport of the Arabidopsis copper chaperone CCH. Plant J 25:521–528
Motoyama T, Kadokura K, Ohira T, Ichiishi A, Fujimura M, Yamaguchi I, Kudo T (2005) A two-component histidine kinase of the rice blast fungus is involved in osmotic stress response and fungicide action. Fungal Genet Biol 42:200–212
Nagahashi G, Tu SI, Fleet G, Namgoong SN (1990) Inhibition of cell-wall associated enzymes in vitro and in vivo with sugar. Plant Physiol 92:413–418
NDong C, Anzellotti D, Ibrahim RK, Huner NP, Sarhan F (2003) Daphnetin methylation by a novel O-methyltransferase is associated with cold acclimation and photosystem II excitation pressure in rye. J Biol Chem 278:6854–6861
Negishi T, Nakanishi H, Yazaki J, Kishimoto N, Fujii F, Shimbo K, Yamamoto K, Sakata K, Sasaki T, Kikuchi S, Mori S, Nishizawa NK (2002) cDNA microarray analysis of gene expression during Fe-deficiency stress in barley suggests that polar transport of vesicles is implicated in phytosiderophore secretion in Fe-deficient barley roots. Plant J 30:83–94
Pellet DM, Papernik LA, Kochian LV (1996) Multiple aluminum-resistance mechanisms in wheat (roles of root apical phosphate and malate exudation). Plant Physiol 112:591–597
Peumans WJ, Van Damme EJM (1995) Lectins as plant defense proteins. Plant Physiol 109:347–352
Polle E, Konzak CF, Kittrick JA (1978) Visual detection of aluminum tolerance levels in wheat by hematoxylin staining of seedling roots. Crop Sci 18:823–827
Raman H, Zhang K, Cakir M, Appels R, Garvin DF, Maron LG, Kochian LV, Moroni JS, Raman R, Imtiaz M, Drake-Brockman F, Waters I, Martin P, Sasaki T, Yamamoto Y, Matsumoto H, Hebb DM, Delhaize E, Ryan PR (2005) Molecular characterization and mapping of ALMT1, the aluminium-tolerance gene of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Genome 48:781–791
Richards KD, Schott EJ, Sharma YK, Davis KR, Gardner RC (1998) Aluminum induces oxidative stress genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol 116:409–418
Ryan PR, Delhaize E, Jones DL (2001) Function and mechanism of organic anion exudation from plant roots. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 52:527–560
Samuels TD, Kucukakyuz K, Rincon-Zachary M (1997) Al partitioning patterns and root growth as related to Al sensitivity and Al tolerance in wheat. Plant Physiol 113:527–534
Sasaki T, Yamamoto Y, Ezaki B, Katsuhara M, Ahn SJ, Ryan PR, Delhaize E, Matsumoto H (2004) A wheat gene encoding an aluminum-activated malate transporter. Plant J 37:645–653
Sauter M, Cornell KA, Beszteri S, Rzewuski G (2004) Functional analysis of methylthioribose kinase genes in plants. Plant Physiol 136:4061–4071
Schaaf G, Ludewig U, Erenoglu BE, Mori S, Kitahara T, von Wiren N (2004) ZmYS1 Functions as a Proton-coupled Symporter for Phytosiderophore- and Nicotianamine-chelated Metals. J Biol Chem 279:9091–9096
Schuler MA, Werck-Reichhart D (2003) Functional genomics of P450s. Annu Rev Plant Biol 54:629–667
Shen H, He LF, Sasaki T, Yamamoto Y, Zheng SJ, Ligaba A, Yan XL, Ahn SJ, Yamaguchi M, Hideo S, Matsumoto H (2005) Citrate secretion coupled with the modulation of soybean root tip under aluminum stress. Up-regulation of transcription, translation, and threonine-oriented phosphorylation of plasma membrane H-ATPase. Plant Physiol 138:287–296
Sivaguru M, Ezaki B, He ZH, Tong H, Osawa H, Baluska F, Volkmann D, Matsumoto H (2003) Aluminum-induced gene expression and protein localization of a cell wall-associated receptor kinase in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 132:2256–2266
Snowden KC, Gardner RC (1993) Five genes induced by aluminum in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) roots. Plant Physiol 103:855–861
Sottomayor M, Lopes Cardoso I, Pereira LG, Ros Barceló A (2004) Peroxidase and the biosynthesis of terpenoid indole alkaloids in the medicinal plant Catharanthus roseus (L.) G. Don. Phytochem Rev 3:159–171
Stukkens Y, Bultreys A, Grec S, Trombik T, Vanham D, Boutry M (2005) NpPDR1, a pleiotropic drug resistance-type ATP-binding cassette transporter from Nicotiana plumbaginifolia, play a major role in plant pathogen defense. Plant Physiol 139:341–352
Taiz L, Zeiger E (2002) Plant Physiology, 3rd edn. Sinauer Associates Publishers, Sunderland, MA
Takita E, Koyama H, Hara T (1999) Organic acid metabolism in aluminum-phosphate utilizing cells of carrot (Daucus carota L.). Plant Cell Physiol 40:489–495
Taylor GJ (1991) Current views of the aluminum stress response; the physiological basis of tolerance. Curr Top Plant Biochem Physiol 10:57–93
Trevino MB, O’Connell MA (1998) Three drought-responsive members of the non-specific lipid-transfer protein gene family in Lycopersicon pennellii show different developmental patterns of expression. Plant Physiol 116:1461–1468
Xu F, Lagudah ES, Moose SP, Riechers DE (2002) Tandemly duplicated Safener-induced glutathione S-transferase genes from Triticum tauschii contribute to genome- and organ-specific expression in hexaploid wheat. Plant Physiol 130:362–373
Yaxley JR, Ross JJ, Sherriff LJ, Reid JB (2001) Gibberellin biosynthesis mutations and root development in pea. Plant Physiol 125:627–633
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge Drs. Patricia Ayoubi and Hua Wen for the technical assistance in array printing and data analysis. This paper reports the results of research only. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this article is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the US Department of Agriculture.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by J.-K. Zhu.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guo, P., Bai, G., Carver, B. et al. Transcriptional analysis between two wheat near-isogenic lines contrasting in aluminum tolerance under aluminum stress. Mol Genet Genomics 277, 1–12 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-006-0169-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-006-0169-x