Abstract
At the era of post-genomics, gene expression analysis constitutes an important step for understanding the biological functions of genes. For this, reverse transcription and real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is one of the most accurate techniques available to date. Normalization with a proper internal control is critical for the generation of reliable results with biological significance. This is particularly true for pathogens, like Leishmania (L.) parasites, that alternate between different stages during their life cycle. In this study, we evaluate six different sequences for their potential as suitable internal control for the study of gene expression in three different developmental stages (procyclic and metacyclic promastigotes and amastigotes) of the parasite Leishmania major. Experiments were performed on RNA purified from three L. major isolates using the RT-PCR technique. Data analysis was performed using GeNorm and NormFinder programs. We could determine that a sequence encoding rRNA45 is the most stable in the three developmental stages of the parasite and can thus be used as a reference gene in gene expression studies in L. major.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
The Leishmaniases are widespread parasitic diseases, with about 360 million people at risk (Desjeux 1996). Unfortunately, anti-leishmanial drugs, mainly based on antimonial therapy, are toxic, and vaccines, recently developed and tried, showed a relatively low protection under field conditions (Kubar and Fragaki 2005).
The Leishmania are digenetic life cycle parasites that alternate between two stages: flagellated promastigotes, which develop in the midgut of the insect vector, and amastigotes, which multiply in the host macrophage (Alexander and Russell 1992; Handman 1999). At this latter stage, Leishmania parasites are sequestered within the phagolysosomal vacuoles, which result from the fusion of phagosomes with lysosomes (Amer and Swanson 2002; Cunningham 2002; Sacks 2001; Duclos and Desjardins 2000; Handman 1999). The two developmental stages display distinct morphologic and metabolic characteristics consistent with a tightly regulated differential expression of parasitic proteins. The identification of stage-specific genes would constitute an important step for understanding the biology of the parasite and for the development of new drugs or vaccines targeting the product of these genes (Stober 2004).
The recent publication of the whole genome sequence of Leishmania major has led to several studies aiming at the identification of stage-regulated genes. Several methods were used that target either the messenger RNA (mRNA) or the protein levels. Studies, mainly using the DNA microarray technique (Holzer et al. 2006; Akopyants et al. 2004; Almeida et al. 2004; Saxena et al. 2003; Almeida et al. 2002), indicate that hundreds of genes are likely to be developmentally regulated. However, the confirmation of their stage-specific expression requires a more precise technique. Relative quantification of mRNA using real-time reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is one of the most accurate techniques available to date for the analysis of gene expression (Ding and Cantor 2004). Usually, expression of a target gene is related to the stable expression of a housekeeping gene simultaneously determined in the same sample (Huggett et al. 2005). As Leishmania alternate between different developmental stages, a stably expressed reference gene is needed for the identification of stage-regulated genes. The aim of this study is to select from a panel of L. major potential reference genes, those that are the most stably expressed during the various parasite developmental stages, to use them as reference in real time RT-PCR studies.
Six sequences were selected (Table 1). One of them, N-myristoyltransferase (NMT), was reported as constitutively expressed at all stages of L. major parasites (Price et al. 2003). The five other sequences [pteridine transporter (PT), rRNA45, rRNA46, NH39, and NH78] were selected because they were shown to be stably expressed using microarray analysis (Akopyants et al. 2004). Small hydrophilic endoplasmic reticulum associated protein (SHERP), a gene previously reported as metacyclic specific, was used as a control stage-specific sequence (Knuepfer et al. 2001).
Three L. major strains were used: two isolates (Zymodeme MON25, MHOM/TN/94/GLC94 and MHOM/TN/94/GLC32), obtained from human zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis lesions (Louzir et al. 1998; Kebaier et al. 2001) and a clone derived from GLC94 (cGLC94). For each strain, three parasite stages were compared for gene expression analysis: procyclics, metacyclics, and amastigotes. Procyclic promastigotes were collected at the logarithmic-growth phase culture in complete medium consisting on RPMI-1640 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) containing 2 mM l-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin, and 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum. For differentiation into metacyclics, a fresh sub-culture was grown, and a growth curve was plotted to ascertain when the cells entered stationary phase (between days 6 and 7). Metacyclics were then purified from stationary phase cultures using Ficoll density gradient centrifugation as previously described (Spath and Beverley 2001). Amastigotes were isolated from L. major-harboring skin lesions of BALB/c mice as described previously (Barral et al. 1983), then purified over a discontinuous gradient centrifugation (Jaffe and Rachamim 1989). For each L. major strain and parasite stage (procyclic and metacyclic promastigotes and amastigote), at least three RNA extractions were performed from different parasite culture. Total RNA was extracted by homogenization in 1 ml TRIzol reagent (Gibco-BRL Life Technologies, Cergy Pontoise, France) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Any possible genomic DNA contamination was eliminated by treatment with deoxyribonuclease I (Dnase I, Boehring Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany). RNA was quantitated using a spectrophotometer. Examination of purified total RNA by gel electrophoresis revealed prominent 18S, 24Sα, and 24Sβ ribosomal bands, indicating that the RNA was not degraded. To minimize the eventual RNA variability, RNA preparations from the same strain and parasite stage were pooled, and 2 μg of the pooled RNA were reverse transcribed as previously described (Chenik et al. 2005) and used for real-time PCR experiments.
Primers, two forward and two reverse, were designed for each sequence using Primer express software (version 1.5, PE Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The optimal upstream and downstream primer sequences for the different genes are shown in Table 1. The experiments were performed using SYBR green I Universal PCR MasterMix (PE Applied Biosystems), and PCR reactions were performed using the ABI Prism 7700 sequence detection system (with version 1.9.1 software, PE Applied Biosystems) in a standard program of 40 cycles (Chenik et al. 2005). For each PCR reaction, the efficiency value (Eff) was calculated from the standard curve based on tenfold serial dilutions of parasite genomic DNA (Table 1). The PCR efficiency ranges from 86 to 98%. All experiments were performed twice using two different pools of parasite RNA preparations.
For all selected reference genes and for each determination, experiments were performed in triplicate. The mean Ct-values were then used for the analysis of gene expression stability using two programs: GeNorm version 3.4 (Vandesompele et al. 2002) and NormFinder (Andersen et al. 2004).
GeNorm relies on the principle that the expression ratio of two perfect reference genes should be identical regardless of the experimental condition or cell type (Vandesompele et al. 2002).
The Ct values for each strain are first transformed into relative quantities using PCR efficiencies as follows: Q = E (min Ct−sample Ct) in which min Ct corresponds to the lowest Ct value between the three developmental stages and sample Ct corresponds to the Ct in the considered stage of the parasite. For each reference gene, the stability measure (M) is estimated by calculating the average pair-wise variation for one gene against all the other tested genes. Those with the lowest M values have the most stable expression among the three strains and the three developmental stages of the parasite. Hence, by a stepwise exclusion of the gene with the highest M value and recalculation of the M values, the combination of the most stable expressed genes is selected. Finally, a normalization factor (NF) is generated over the most stable genes by calculating the geometric mean of their relative quantities.
In addition, pair-wise variations (Vn/n + 1) are calculated for every series of NFn and NFn + 1 to determine the effect of adding a (n + 1) gene in normalization. A large pair-wise variation means that the added gene has a significant effect on normalization and, thus, should preferably be included for calculation of a reliable normalization factor (Vandesompele et al. 2002).
Hence, to study the possible inter-strain variations not considered in GeNorm, we performed additional analyses using Normfinder. In this program, the stability value is based on the combined estimate of intra- and inter-group expression variations of the studied genes. A low gene stability value indicating a low combined intra- and inter-group variation proves high expression stability of this gene (Andersen et al. 2004).
The ranking of the six tested genes according to their M value (GenNorm) was (from the least stable to the most stable): NMT, rRNA46, PT, NH78, NH39, and rRNA45 (Fig. 1a). It is interesting to note that a similar order, in terms of expression stability, was obtained when using Normfinder program (Fig. 1a). Indeed, using the two programs, rRNA45 emerged as the most stable gene in the three developmental stages of the parasite and, thus, can be used as a reference gene in gene expression studies in L. major.
Although most studies used only one single gene as an internal control for normalization, it has been suggested that the use of more than one gene might generate more reliable results (Vandesompele et al. 2002). We therefore evaluated the optimal number of genes required for accurate normalization using the GeNorm program.
To estimate the benefit of using additional (n + 1) control gene, pair-wise variation (Vn/n + 1) was calculated between consecutively ranked normalization factors. As a significant increase between V2/3 (0.108) and V3/4 (0.120) is obtained (Fig. 1b), we consider that use of the four most stable genes (rRNA45, NH39, NH78, and PT) for normalization should allow a more accurate normalization.
To validate the reference genes identified in this study, we compared the gene expression profiles of a stage-specific gene (SHERP) in the three L. major strains using either rRNA45 alone as reference gene or the combination of the four most stable reference genes (Fig. 2).
Relative expression of SHERP in the different developmental stages of the parasite shows the same general trend in the three strains using either rRNA 45 or the four reference genes for normalization. Indeed, SHERP is overexpressed in the metacyclic stage of the parasite compared to the procyclic and the amastigote stages. The most important differences in terms of expression were found between the metacyclic and amastigote stage, in agreement with previous works (Almeida et al. 2004; Knuepfer et al. 2001). However, the use of four reference genes seems to slightly reduce the ratio of relative expression.
In conclusion, the proper selection of a reference gene in gene expression studies targeting the different developmental stages of L. major is crucial to generate data with biological significance. In this study, the analysis of a panel of different potential candidate reference genes allowed us to identify a suitable reference gene (rRNA45), characterized by a stable expression through the various developmental stages of L. major. In addition, we demonstrate that normalization with a single reference gene could generate results comparable to those normalized against a combination of the four most stable genes (rRNA45, NH39, NH78, and PT). These results may provide a guideline for future works on gene expression in the different Leishmania stages using real-time PCR.
References
Akopyants NS, Matlib RS, Bukanova EN, Smeds MR, Brownstein BH, Stormo GD, Beverley SM (2004) Expression profiling using random genomic DNA microarrays identifies differentially expressed genes associated with three major developmental stages of the protozoan parasite Leishmania major. Mol Biochem Parasitol 136:71–86
Alexander J, Russell DG (1992) The interaction of Leishmania species with macrophages. Adv Parasitol 31:175–254
Almeida R, Norrish A, Levick M, Vetrie D, Freeman T, Vilo J, Ivens A, Lange U, Stober C, McCann S, Blackwell JM (2002) From genomes to vaccines: Leishmania as a model. Philos Trans R Soc Lond, B Biol Sci 357:5–11
Almeida R, Gilmartin BJ, McCann SH, Norrish A, Ivens AC, Lawson D, Levick MP, Smith DF, Dyall SD, Vetrie D, Freeman TC, Coulson RM, Sampaio I, Schneider H, Blackwell JM (2004) Expression profiling of the Leishmania life cycle: cDNA arrays identify developmentally regulated genes present but not annotated in the genome. Mol Biochem Parasitol 136:87–100
Amer AO, Swanson MS (2002) A phagosome of one’s own: a microbial guide to life in the macrophage. Curr Opin Microbiol 5:56–61
Andersen CL, Jensen JL, Orntoft TF (2004) Normalization of real-time quantitative reverse transcription–PCR data: a model-based variance estimation approach to identify genes suited for normalization, applied to bladder and colon cancer data sets. Cancer Res 64:5245–5250
Barral A, Petersen EA, Sacks DL, Neva FA (1983) Late metastatic Leishmaniasis in the mouse. A model for mucocutaneous disease. Am J Trop Med Hyg 32:277–285
Chenik M, Douagi F, Achour YB, Khalef NB, Ouakad M, Louzir H, Dellagi K (2005) Characterization of two different mucolipin-like genes from Leishmania major. Parasitol Res 98:5–13
Cunningham AC (2002) Parasitic adaptive mechanisms in infection by leishmania. Exp Mol Pathol 72:132–141
Desjeux P (1996) Leishmaniasis Public health aspects and control. Clin Dermatol 14:417–423
Ding C, Cantor CR (2004) Quantitative analysis of nucleic acids—the last few years of progress. J Biochem Mol Biol 37:1–10
Duclos S, Desjardins M (2000) Subversion of a young phagosome: the survival strategies of intracellular pathogens. Cell Microbiol 2:365–377
Handman E (1999) Cell biology of Leishmania. Adv Parasitol 44:1–39
Holzer TR, McMaster WR, Forney JD (2006) Expression profiling by whole-genome interspecies microarray hybridization reveals differential gene expression in procyclic promastigotes, lesion-derived amastigotes, and axenic amastigotes in Leishmania mexicana. Mol Biochem Parasitol 146:198–218
Huggett J, Dheda K, Bustin S, Zumla A (2005) Real-time RT-PCR normalisation; strategies and considerations. Genes Immun 6:279–284
Jaffe CL, Rachamim N (1989) Amastigote stage-specific monoclonal antibodies against Leishmania major. Infect Immun 57:3770–3777
Kebaier C, Louzir H, Chenik M, Ben Salah A, Dellagi K (2001) Heterogeneity of wild Leishmania major isolates in experimental murine pathogenicity and specific immune response. Infect Immun 69:4906–4915
Knuepfer E, Stierhof YD, McKean PG, Smith DF (2001) Characterization of a differentially expressed protein that shows an unusual localization to intracellular membranes in Leishmania major. Biochem J 356:335–344
Kubar J, Fragaki K (2005) Recombinant DNA-derived Leishmania proteins: from the laboratory to the field. Lancet Infect Dis 5:107–114
Louzir H, Melby PC, Ben Salah A, Marrakchi H, Aoun K, Ben Ismail R, Dellagi K (1998) Immunologic determinants of disease evolution in localized cutaneous leishmaniasis due to Leishmania major. J Infect Dis 177:1687–1695
Price HP, Menon MR, Panethymitaki C, Goulding D, McKean PG, Smith DF (2003) Myristoyl-CoA:protein N-myristoyltransferase, an essential enzyme and potential drug target in kinetoplastid parasites. J Biol Chem 278:7206–7214
Sacks DL (2001) Leishmania-sand fly interactions controlling species-specific vector competence. Cell Microbiol 3:189–196
Saxena A, Worthey EA, Yan S, Leland A, Stuart KD, Myler PJ (2003) Evaluation of differential gene expression in Leishmania major Friedlin procyclics and metacyclics using DNA microarray analysis. Mol Biochem Parasitol 129:103–114
Spath GF, Beverley SM (2001) A lipophosphoglycan-independent method for isolation of infective Leishmania metacyclic promastigotes by density gradient centrifugation. Exp Parasitol 99:97–103
Stober CB (2004) From genomes to vaccines for leishmaniasis. Methods Mol Biol 270:423–438
Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, Poppe B, Van Roy N, De Paepe A, Speleman F (2002) Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol 3:RESEARCH0034
Acknowledgment
We gratefully acknowledge Dr. Yosser Ben Achour-Chenik for manuscript reading and helpful discussions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ouakad, M., Bahi-Jaber, N., Chenik, M. et al. Selection of endogenous reference genes for gene expression analysis in Leishmania major developmental stages. Parasitol Res 101, 473–477 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-007-0491-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-007-0491-1