Abstract
Anopheles beklemishevi specimens from Russia were analysed by their ITS2 ribosomal DNA sequence to amend and to specify the phylogenetic tree of the Anopheles maculipennis species complex. Surprisingly, with 638 base pairs, the ITS2 regions of all the 34 An beklemishevi specimens examined were considerably longer than those of all their sibling species. Sequence alignment with GenBank derived sequences of the other siblings was only possible in the beginning (for approx. 335 bp) and at the end (for approx. 150 bp) of the PCR-amplified DNA fragment, whereas in the middle, the An beklemishevi DNA sequence found no counterpart in sequences of the other siblings. Closer analysis of this intermediate part suggests a duplicated insertion of about 140 bp that has undergone subsequent mutational changes. Due to this large putative insertion, computerized phylogenetic analysis by the Bayesian inference method locates An beklemishevi in a closer relationship to the nearctic than to the palaearctic sibling species. However, when only ITS2 regions are compared, that have corresponding sequences in the other siblings, An beklemishevi forms a lineage with the palaearctic species although it is still most remotely related. It is hypothesized that during the evolution An beklemishevi separated first from the common ancestor of the palaearctic species, which had presumably made its way from the Nearctic to the Palaearctic.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The Anopheles maculipennis complex, containing the former and the present Eurasian and North American malaria vectors, was first described in 1927 by van Thiel. According to White (1978) and Barr and Guptavanij (1988), it consists of 11 palaearctic and five nearctic sibling species (Table 1). Seven of the palaearctic species are indigenous in Europe and two in Middle Asia and North Africa, respectively (Jetten and Takken 1994). Among the first, An messeae has the largest distribution covering the whole of Central Europe and considerable areas of the former Soviet Union. An maculipennis s.s. and An atroparvus occur, partly sympatrically, in most of Europe, whereas An labranchiae, An sacharovi and An melanoon are mainly restricted to the coastal regions of the Mediterranean and the Black Sea (Coluzzi 1970). The distribution of An beklemishevi ranges from Scandinavia via East Europe to Russia (Lokki et al. 1979; Stegniy 1982; Jaenson et al. 1986), and An martinius and An sicaulti are non-European species to be found in Middle Asia and North Africa, respectively.
While there is hardly any doubt on the species status of eight of the palaearctic An maculipennis sibling species, An sicaulti is not unrestrictedly considered a sibling. In fact, evidence predominates that it is rather a local variant of An atroparvus than a good species (e.g. de Zulueta et al. 1983). Also, the species status of An subalpinus, which is sometimes listed as a further palaearctic member of the An maculipennis complex is uncertain. In contrast to various cytogenetic studies (White 1978), it can locally be distinguished from other complex species by allozymes (Cianchi et al. 1987). However, recent data based on nucleotide sequence analysis suggests synonymity of An subalpinus with An melanoon (Linton et al. 2002, Boccolini et al. 2003; Kampen, unpublished).
At times of endemic malaria in Europe, An labranchiae and An sacharovi used to be the most dangerous vectors (Jetten and Takken 1994), and even nowadays An sacharovi plays an important role in the transmission of endemic malaria in southeast Turkey (Çağlar and Alten 2000).
The nearctic species of the An maculipennis complex are mainly found in the west of North America and only little overlap in their distributions (White 1978; Barr 1988). An earlei occurs in the south of Canada and in the North of USA transcontinentally from the Atlantic to the Pacific Ocean, whereas the other nearctic siblings are restricted to the west of the Rocky Mountains. Except for the close Pacific coast, An freeborni populates nearly the whole western North America (Aitken 1945). In contrast, An occidentalis can be found only in coastal areas of western North America beginning from the middle of the USA and reaching as far as Alaska. An aztecus occurs in the highlands of central Mexico, and An hermsi, recognized as a separate sibling species not before 1987 (Barr and Guptavanij 1988), so far has been demonstrated only for California (Cope et al. 1988). Both An freeborni und An hermsi are considered efficient malaria vectors (Service 2000).
Except for An freeborni and An hermsi (cf. Fritz et al. 1991), the nearctic maculipennis-siblings can be identified by slight but consistent morphological differences in all developmental stages (Pratt 1952) suggesting that evolution has likely been acting for a longer time or more quickly on the nearctic than on the palaearctic mosquitoes. This hypothesis is backed by the fact that the distributions of the various nearctic sibling species hardly overlap (Kitzmiller et al. 1967). Due to their apparently shorter evolution, the palaearctic sibling species are isomorphic or only present minor morphological variations in some developmental stages. Nevertheless, as well as the nearctic species, they may exhibit different behaviour, ecologies and even vector competences for one pathogen or the other (Jetten and Takken, 1994). Hence, reliable species differentiation is essential.
Classically, the palaearctic An maculipennis complex species are differentiated by the egg shell morphology (Hackett et al. 1932; Bates and Hackett 1939; Korvenkontio et al. 1979) but various other identification techniques have been employed: larval chaetotaxy (Bates 1939; Suzzoni-Blatger and Sevin 1982; Deruaz et al. 1991), cytotaxonomy (Frizzi 1953; Kitzmiller et al. 1967; Stegnii 1987), isoenzyme analysis (Bullini and Coluzzi 1978; Korvenkontio et al. 1979; Stegniy 1982) and cuticular hydrocarbon chromatography (Phillips et al. 1990). Owing to a lack of reliability and/or other disadvantages of the forementioned techniques in practical routine application, alternate identification methodologies have been searched for.
A few years ago, a PCR based diagnostic assay was established for six of the palaearctic An maculipennis sibling species that makes use of interspecific sequence differences in the ITS2 ribosomal mosquito DNA (Proft et al. 1999). Using this test, the sibling species can be distinguished unambiguously by means of the species-specific lengths of their PCR products.
When the assay was developed, however, no An beklemishevi specimens were available to comparatively investigate their ITS2 region. As we could get hold of specimens from several Russian An beklemishevi populations in the meantime, we were able to analyse the ITS2 region and, based on its nucleotide sequence, the phylogenetic relationships of this species in relation to the other An maculipennis siblings.
Materials and methods
Mosquito origin
An beklemishevi specimens from five collections at three different geographical sites in Russia were included. They were identified by egg morphology, larval cytotaxonomy or taxonprinting (Novikov and Shevchenko 2001) by experienced Russian scientists:
-
1.
Krivosheino, Tomsk oblast, Siberia (57N, 83E): seven specimens, collected 1999, identified by egg morphology.
-
2.
Krivosheino, Tomsk oblast, Siberia (57N, 83E): four specimens, collected 2001, identified by egg morphology.
-
3.
Krivosheino, Tomsk oblast, Siberia (57N, 83E): ten specimens, collected 2002, identified by egg morphology.
-
4.
Sredniy Vasyugan, Tomsk oblast, Siberia (59N, 78E): ten specimens, collected 1982, identified by cytotaxonomy.
-
5.
Cherga, Gorno Altay Republic, Siberia (51N, 85E): three specimens, collected 1998, identified by taxonprinting.
Individuals from collections one to four were larvae fixed in ethanol. From the Cherga specimens (collection 5) extracted DNA was provided for further analysis.
DNA extraction
DNA was extracted from two to three abdominal segments or, in some cases, from whole individuals using short protocols described by Walsh et al. (1991) and Guy and Stanek (1991). The first includes homogenization of mosquito tissue in Chelex resin and the second boiling of homogenized tissue in ammonia.
DNA amplification
The ITS2 ribosomal DNA was amplified using primers 5.8S and 28S that hybridize to conserved flanking regions (Collins and Paskewitz 1996):
5.8S: 5′-TGTGAACTGCAGGACACATG-3′
28S: 5′-ATGCTTAAATTTAGGGGGTA-3′
1–3 μl of DNA solution was added to a PCR mixture (50 μl total volume) composed of 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.3, 50 mM KCl, 200 μM dNTPs, 200 nM of each primer, 1 mM MgCl2, and 1.25 units of Taq DNA-polymerase (Invitrogen). Thermoconditions were 4 min initially at 94°C, followed by 35 cycles of 1 min at 94°C, 1 min at 50°C and 1 min at 72°C, and finally 10 additional minutes at 72°C.
DNA sequencing
PCR products were seperated by electrophoresis on 1.5% agarose gels, and bands were excised with a scalpel. DNA was recovered using the ‘DNA Gel Extraction Kit’ (Qiagen) and prepared for DNA sequencing. Sequencing was done by cycle sequencing on an ABI Prism 310 DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems) using primers 5.8S and 28S as sequencing primers. All PCR products were sequenced in duplicate in both directions.
Phylogenetic analysis
ITS2 sequences to be analysed in relation to the An beklemishevi sequences were derived from the GenBank. 421 ITS2 sequence entries for the palaearctic and nearctic sibling species of the An maculipennis complex were found. They were aligned according to species in order to obtain species-specific consensus sequences. Such consensus sequences, based on 129 An maculipennis s.s., 96 An sacharovi, 47 An messeae, 41 An atroparvus, 12 An labranchiae and 3 An martinius entries as well as one entry each for An hermsi (GenBank accession no. M64482), An freeborni (M64483) and An occidentalis (M64484), were further analysed together with the newly obtained An beklemishevi data. Phylogenetic trees were rooted using the ITS2 sequences of An quadrimaculatus species A (U32503) and of An dirus species A (U60410), respectively, as outgroups. An dirus was selected as one outgroup because its ITS2 region is of similar length as the An beklemishevi one turned out to be, whereas the An quadrimaculatus ITS2 region is comparable in length with those of the other palaearctic sibling species.
Sequences were aligned using ClustalX software (Thompson et al. 1997), and phylogenetic trees were built by means of PAUP 4.0 beta 10 (Swofford 1999). Maximum likelihood models were fitted using the Modeltest 3.0 (Posada and Crandall 1998), and relationships between DNA sequences were tested with the Bayesian inference method (MrBayes V3 b4 v2win software; Huelsenbeck 2001). For employing the optimal model complexity, simulations were run with four chains for 2,000,000 steps with a 2,000-step burn-in period, consensus 95% cumulative probability and sampling every 100 steps.
Results
Gel electrophoresis of the amplified DNA-fragments already indicated a considerably larger length of the An beklemishevi ITS2 region compared to the other palaearctic An maculipennis sibling species (Fig. 1). DNA sequencing showed the amplicons to be invariant for all populations and all individuals examined (Fig. 2). The PCR product of An beklemishevi consisted of 782 base pairs (bp), 638 of which represent the presumptive ITS2 region (cf. Porter and Collins 1991; Marinucci et al. 1999). The GC content amounts to 46.6%.
The alignment of the An beklemishevi consensus sequence with GenBank derived ITS2 sequences of the other An maculipennis complex species displays nucleotide concordance to a large extent in the beginning (for approx. 335 bp) and at the end (for approx. 150 bp) of the amplified DNA fragment (Fig. 3). However, in the middle of the An beklemishevi sequence there is a region of more than 300 nucleotides finding no counterpart in the other siblings. Closer analysis of this intermediate region suggests that an insertion comprising about 140 nucleotides has duplicated and later on underwent further mutational changes (Fig. 2). Interestingly, an 18mer sequence can be found within the hypothesized duplication that is nearly identical to the 28S primer whereby absolute identity exists for the first seven 3′-end nucleotides (Fig. 2).
Surprisingly, according to the Bayesian analysis, An beklemishevi is predicted to build a phylogenetic lineage with the nearctic maculipennis sibling species (Fig. 4) among which An freeborni and An hermsi are most closely related. In the same cladogram, An atroparvus and An messeae seem to be more closely related than the other palaearctic species while An sacharovi has an isolated position. However, this phylogenetic tree is generally very weakly supported, most probably due to the An beklemishevi putative insertion that cannot phylogenetically be compared with corresponding sequences in the other species. When this insertion is deleted from the An beklemishevi ITS2 sequence for comparative purposes, leaving more or less equally long ITS2 sections for all sibling species, the Bayesian analysis results in the expected closer relationship of An beklemishevi with the palaearctic siblings (Fig. 5) although it still appears to be phylogenetically most isolated. Moreover, in the case of this second approach much higher posterior probability values are given.
Discussion
An beklemishevi is a true cytospecies of the An maculipennis complex and was first described in 1975 (Stegnii and Kabanova 1978). It only occurs in Scandinavia and parts of Russia (Stegniy et al. 1978; Korvenkontio et al. 1979; Jaenson et al. 1986). So far, no published work exists on it being examined on a DNA basis, probably due to a lack of collection material. Except for one GenBank entry (accession no. AJ511867), this is the first time that sequence data for An beklemishevi are presented. According to the sequence already deposited in the GenBank, the An beklemishevi ITS2 region is 335 nucleotides long, but acceptable concordance with the other siblings can only be found for several short sections (data not shown). However, when this An beklemishevi GenBank entry is aligned with the sequence obtained within this study, there is a very high sequence similarity beginning from some 30 to 40 nucleotides after the 5.8S-end of the two sequences (Fig. 3). The GenBank sequence ends after approximately 410 nucleotides of the sequence presented here, still matching it very well but at the same time lacking the 28S-end both of this sequence and of that of the other An maculipennis sibling species sequences. Unfortunately, there is no information on how the An beklemishevi GenBank entry sequence was obtained.
The ITS2 sequence presented here is nearly twice as long. Compared to other anopheline species, it is so far actually identified at the maximum length (Beebe and Cooper 2000). Typical ITS2 lengths are between 350 bp and 500 bp, however, for An punctulatus and An dirus complex species more than 600 bp and 700 bp, respectively, have been determined (Xu and Qu, 1997; Beebe et al. 1999). Quite unusual is a significant discrepancy in length within the same complex as found between An beklemishevi and the other palaearctic An maculipennis sibling species whose ITS2 regions are between 290 bp and 312 bp (Proft et al. 1999). Sequence characteristics indicating that the putative insertion responsible for the considerable length of the An beklemishevi sequence is the result of a former integration of a mobile element could not be recognized when checked by BLAST search.
Beginning with nucleotides 427 and 579 of the An beklemishevi PCR product, respectively, there is a repeated motif of 18 nucleotides that finds complementary bases in the 28S primer and exactly matches within the first seven nucleotides. Given a hybridization of the 28S primer to these regions, a 444- and a 596-bp amplicon ought to be expected. However, respective DNA bands were never observed after gel electrophoresis. Furthermore, alignments with sequences corresponding to such hypothetical PCR products would not be possible since considerable parts matching the ITS2 regions of the other siblings follow only past these sites.
Marinucci et al. (1999) were the first to infer phylogenetic trees for the whole An maculipennis complex from DNA sequence data. Their results generally correspond with the data presented here, however, their trees do not include An beklemishevi and are based on a quite limited number of mosquitoes resulting in weak posterior probabilities. Their ITS2 sequence data and many more are involved in the phylogenetic study presented here. Correspondingly, in both analyses, An freeborni and An hermsi are more closely related to each other than to An occidentalis. Within the palaearctic branch, An sacharovi is in both studies somewhat isolated from the other siblings.
With regard to An beklemishevi, the computer analysis locates this species closer to the nearctic than to the palaearctic maculipennis species although both groups have ITS2 sequences of only around 300 bp. It is to be taken into account that only one ITS2 sequence each was available for the nearctic species, whereas considerable numbers of sequences were used for the palaearctic species.
The hypothesis, that the nearctic and palaearctic An maculipennis species build distinct lineages, was already expressed decades ago (Kitzmiller et al. 1967). Contrasting former tacit assumptions that the nearctic maculipennis species have been derived from a Bering-connexion immigrant, genetic and cytogenetic as well as morphological, distributional and taxonomic data highly support a descent of the palaearctic from the nearctic species. Therefore, An beklemishevi must be expected to be more closely related to the palaearctic sibling species and in fact cannot be distinguished from them by morphological features. Based on the cytogenetic and biochemical features, Stegnii (1981, 1991) has constructed a scheme of speciation for the palaearctic An maculipennis complex, according to which the ancestral species developed to An labranchiae which in its turn was the ancestor of the other palaearctic species except for An beklemishevi. An beklemishevi is said to have originated from the nearctic evolutionary branch and is not directly related to the other palaearctic species. Later on, when investigating interspecific differences in pericentromeric heterochromatin, Sharakhova et al. (1997) concluded that An labranchiae and An beklemishevi have a common ancestor originating from the nearctic complex. Only recently, Harbach (2004) presented a revised classification of the genus Anopheles including the formal and informal taxa and preliminary hypothetical phylogenetic relationships. He added two more sibling species to the palaearctic branch of An maculipennis group found in Iran and in Romania: An persiensis (Sedaghat et al. 2003) and An daciae (Nicolescu et al. 2004). Moreover, An beklemishevi is not grouped together with the other palaearctic siblings in the ‘maculipennis subgroup’ but in the ‘quadrimaculatus subgroup’.
The data presented here demonstrate the exceptional position of An beklemishevi and support the theory of an early split of An beklemishevi from the ancestor of the other palaearctic species of the An maculipennis complex. The differences in the ITS2 nucleotide sequence have been exploited to integrate An beklemishevi in a multiplex PCR assay diagnostic for the palaearctic An maculipennis sibling species in order to facilitate species identification (Kampen 2005).
References
Aitken THG (1945) Studies on the anopheline complex of western North America. Univ Calif Publ Entomol 7:273–364
Barr AR (1988) The Anopheles maculipennis complex (Diptera: Culicidae) in western North America. In: Service MW (ed) Biosystematics of haematophagous insects, Systematics Association Special Volume No. 37. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 37:19–24
Barr AR, Guptavanij P (1988) Anopheles hermsi, n. sp., an unrecognized American species of the Anopheles maculipennis group (Diptera: Culicidae). Mosq Syst 20:352–356
Bates M (1939) Variation in the antepalmate hairs of larvae of the Anopheles maculipennis complex. Riv Malariol 18:299–312
Bates M, Hackett LW (1939) The distinguishing characteristics of the populations of Anopheles maculipennis found in southern Europe. Proc Int Congr Entomol 3:1555–1569
Beebe NW, Cooper RD (2000) Systematics of malaria vectors with particular reference to the Anopheles punctulatus group. Int J Parasitol 30:1–17
Beebe NW, Ellis JT, Cooper RD, Saul A (1999) DNA sequence analysis of the ribosomal DNA ITS2 region for the Anopheles punctulatus group of mosquitoes. Insect Mol Biol 8:381–390
Boccolini D, di Luca M, Marinucci M, Romi R (2003) Further molecular and morphological support for the formal synonymy of Anopheles subalpinus Hackett and Lewis with An melanoon Hackett. Eur Mosq Bull 16:1–5
Bullini L, Coluzzi M (1978) Applied and theoretical significance of electrophoretic studies in mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). Parassitologia 20:7–21
Çağlar SS, Alten B (2000) Malaria situation and its vectors in Turkey. In: Çağlar SS, Alten B, Özer N (eds) Proceedings of the 13th european society for vector ecology meeting, Antalya, Turkey, Ankara, DTP, pp 234–245
Cianchi R, Sabatini A, Boccolini B, Bullini L, Coluzzi M (1987) Electrophoretic evidence of reproductive isolation between sympatric populations of Anopheles melanoon and An subalpinus. In: 3rd international congress on Malaria and Babesiosis, September 7–11, Annecy, France, Abstracts p 1560
Collins FH, Paskewitz SM (1996) A review of the use of ribosomal DNA (rDNA) to differentiate among cryptic Anopheles species. Insect Mol Biol 5:1–9
Coluzzi M (1970) Sibling species in Anopheles and their importance in malariology. Misc Publ Entomol Soc Am 7:63–77
Cope SE, Stoddard RJ, Barr AR (1988) The distribution of an undescribed member of the Anopheles maculipennis complex in California. Proc Calif Mosq Vector Contr Assoc 56:130–134
Deruaz D, Deruaz J, Pichot J (1991) Correspondence analysis of larval chaetotaxy in the “Anopheles maculipennis complex“ (Diptera: Culicidae). Ann Parasitol Hum Comp 66:166–172
Fritz GN, Narang SK, Kline DL, Seawright JS, Washino RK, Porter CH, Collins FH (1991) Diagnostic characterization of Anopheles freeborni and An hermsi by hybrid crosses, frequences of polytene X chromosomes and rDNA restriction enzyme fragments. J Am Mosq Contr Assoc 7:198–206
Frizzi G (1953) Etude cytogénétique d’Anopheles maculipennis en Italie. Bull WHO 9:335–344
Guy EC, Stanek G (1991) Detection of Borrelia burgdorferi in patients with Lyme disease by the polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Pathol 44:610–611
Hackett LW, Martini E, Missiroli A (1932) The races of A maculipennis. Am J Hyg 16: 137–162
Harbach RE (2004) The classification of the genus Anopheles (Diptera: Culicidae): a working hypothesis of phylogenetic relationships. Bull Ent Res 94:537–553
Huelsenbeck JP (2001) MrBayes V3 b4 v2win: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. University California-San Diego, La Jolla
Jaenson TGT, Lokki J, Saura A (1986) Anopheles (Diptera: Culicidae) and malaria in northern Europe, with special reference to Sweden. J Med Entomol 23:68–75
Jetten TH, Takken W (1994) Anophelism without malaria in Europe—a review of the ecology and distribution of the genus Anopheles in Europe. Wageningen Agric Univ Papers 94–5
Kampen H (2005) Integration of Anopheles beklemishevi (Diptera: Culicidae) in a PCR assay diagnostic for palaearctic Anopheles maculipennis sibling species. Parasitol Res (in press). DOI 10.1007/s00436-005-1392-9
Kitzmiller JB, Frizzi G, Baker RH (1967) Evolution and speciation in the maculipennis complex of the genus Anopheles. In: Pal R, Wright JW (eds) Genetics of insect vectors of disease. Elsevier, Amsterdam London New York, pp 151–209
Korvenkontio P, Lokki J, Saura A, Ulmanen I (1979) Anopheles maculipennis complex (Diptera: Culicidae) in northern Europe: species diagnosis by egg structure and enzyme polymorphism. J Med Entomol 16:169–170
Linton Y-M, Smith L, Harbach RE (2002) Observations on the taxonomic status of Anopheles subalpinus Hackett & Lewis and An melanoon Hackett. Eur Mosq Bull 13:1–7
Lokki J, Saura A, Korvenkontio P, Ulmanen I (1979) Diagnosing adult Anopheles mosquitoes. Aquilo Ser Zool 20:5–12
Marinucci M, Romi R, Mancini P, di Luca M, Severini C (1999) Phylogenetic relationships of seven palearctic members of the maculipennis complex inferred from ITS2 sequence analysis. Insect Mol Biol 8:469–480
Nicolescu G, Linton Y-M, Vladimirescu A, Howard TM, Harbach RE (2004) Mosquitoes of the Anopheles maculipennis group (Diptera: Culicidae) in Romania, with the discovery and formal recognition of a new species based on molecular and morphological evidence. Bull Ent Res 94:525–535
Novikov YM, Shevchenko AI (2001) Inversion polymorphism and divergence of two cryptic forms of Anopheles messeae (Diptera, Culicidae) at the level of genomic DNA repeats. Russ J Genet 37:754–763
Phillips A, Sabatini A, Milligan PJM, Boccolini D, Broomfeld G, Molyneux DH (1990) The Anopheles maculipennis complex (Diptera: Culicidae): comparison of the cuticuar hydrocarbon profiles determined in adults of five Palaearctic species. Bull Ent Res 80:459–464
Porter CH, Collins FH (1991) Species-diagnostic differences in a ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer from the sibling species Anopheles freeborni and Anopheles hermsi (Diptera: Culicidae). Am J Trop Med Hyg 45:271–279
Posada D, Crandall KA (1998) Model test: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817–818
Pratt HD (1952) Notes on Anopheles earlei and other American species of the Anopheles maculipennis complex. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1:484–493
Proft J, Maier WA, Kampen H (1999) Identification of six sibling species of the Anopheles maculipennis complex (Diptera: Culicidae) by a polymerase chain reaction assay. Parasitol Res 85:837–843
Sedaghat MM, Linton Y-M, Oshagi MA, Vatandoost H, Harbach RE (2003) The Anopheles maculipennis complex (Diptera: Culicidae) in Iran: molecular characterization and recognition of a new species. Bull Ent Res 93:527–535
Service MW (2000) Anopheline mosquitoes (Anophelinae). In: Service MW (ed) Medical entomology for students, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 33–51
Sharakhova MV, Stegnii VN, Braginets OP (1997) Interspecific differences in structure of pericentromeric heterochromatin in ovarian trophocytes and evolution of malaria mosquitoes of the Anopheles maculipennis species complex. Russ J Genet 33:1400–1407
Stegnii VN (1981) Genetic bases of evolution of malaria mosquitoes Anopheles from the maculipennis species complex (Diptera, Culicidae): I. Chromosome phylogenetic relations. Zool Zh 60:69–77
Stegnii VN (1987) Systematic reorganization of the architectonics of polytene chromosomes during ontogeny and phylogeny of malarial mosquitoes. I. Differences in the nuclear structure of the somatic and generative tissues. Genetika 23:821–826
Stegnii VN (1991) Populyatsionnaya genetika i evolyutsiya malyariinykh komarov (Population genetics and evolution of malaria mosquitoes) [in Russian]. Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russia
Stegnii VN, Kabanova VM (1978) Cytoecological study of indigenous populations of the malaria mosquito in the territory of the U S S R: I. Identification of a new species of Anopheles in the maculipennis complex by the cytodiagnostic method. Mosq Syst 10:1–12
Stegniy VN (1982) Genetic adaptation and speciation in sibling species of the Eurasian maculipennis complex. In: Steiner WWM, Tabachnik WJ, Rai KS, Narang NS (eds) Recent developments in the genetics of insect disease vectors. Stipes Publ Co., Champaign Illinois, pp 454–464
Stegniy VN, Novikov YM, Kabanova VM (1978) Cytogenetic analysis and distribution of Anopheles beklemishevi. Zool Zh 57:873–876
Suzzoni-Blattger J, Sevin A (1982) Etude de la chétotaxie larvaire du “complexe maculipennis” (Diptera – Culicidae) dans la région toulousaine. Ann Parasitol 57:649–654
Swofford DL (1999) Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony version 4. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts
van Thiel PH (1927) Sur l’origine des variations de taille de l’Anopheles maculipennis dans les Pays-Bas. Bull Soc Path Exot 20:366–390
Thompson JD, Gibson DF, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG (1997) The ClustalX-Windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucl Acids Res 25:4876–4882
Walsh PS, Metzger DA, Higuchi R (1991) Chelex 100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR-based typing from forensic material. BioTechniques 10:506–513
White GB (1978) Systematic reappraisal of the Anopheles maculipennis complex. Mosq Syst 10:13–44
Xu JN, Qu FY (1997) Ribosomal RNA differences between species A and D of the Anopheles dirus complex of mosquitoes in China. Med Vet Entomol 11:134–138
de Zulueta J, Ramsdale C, Cianchi R, Bullini L, Coluzzi M (1983) Observations on the taxonomic status of Anopheles sicaulti. Parassitologia 25:73–92
Acknowledgments
I heartily thank all the Russian scientists for promptly and unselfishly providing An beklemishevi mosquito specimens involved in the study: Dr. Alexey V. Katokhin (Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Russian Academy of Science, Novosibirsk, Russia), Dr. Yuriy M. Novikov (Research Institute for Biology and Biophysics, Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russia), Dr. Olga P. Braginets (presently Department of Biological Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA), and particularly Dr. Maria V. Sharakhova (presently Center for Tropical Disease Research and Training, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, USA) who organized mosquitoes herself and arranged all the other contacts. Furthermore, I am indebted to Carolin Wiersch (Institute for Medical Parasitology, University of Bonn, Germany) and Dr. Bernhard Misof (Zoological Research Institute and Museum Alexander Koenig, Bonn, Germany) for their introduction into the Bayesian analysis and their assistance in generating the phylogenetic trees.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kampen, H. The ITS2 ribosomal DNA of Anopheles beklemishevi and further remarks on the phylogenetic relationships within the Anopheles maculipennis group of species (Diptera: Culicidae). Parasitol Res 97, 118–128 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-005-1393-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-005-1393-8