Abstract
Background and aims: The usefulness of histological diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is limited by poor specificity or sensitivity of available diagnostic tools. Recently, ultrastructural morphometry showed interstitial space dilation (ISD) to be a reliable sign of reflux disease. Aims of this study were to (a) search for a light microscopy equivalent of ISD, (b) test its diagnostic value, and (c) look for a possible role of intercellular glycoconjugates in its genesis. Methods: Esophageal grasp biopsies were taken during endoscopy, 2–3 cm and 6–7 cm above the squamo- columnar junction, from patients under investigation for GERD symptoms. The biopsies were fixed in aldehyde solutions and embedded in resin for electron microscopy or in paraffin for routine histology, and the glycoconjugates underwent immunohistochemistry using 3-fucosyl-N-acetylactosamine antibodies. Results: Irregular intercellular space dilation was detected in the basal and prickle layers using both light and electron microscopy. Hematoxylin–eosin preparations showed ISD in 20 of 22 (90%) erosive esophagitis cases, 30 of 44 (68%) endoscopy negative GERD cases, and 1 of 12 (8%) controls, with good interobserver (K=0.75) and bioptic site reproducibility. ISD correlated with loss or rearrangement of intercellular glycoconjugates of the overlying layers and with granulocyte (eosinophil and/or neutrophil) infiltration. Conclusions: Light microscopy ISD is a suitable index of GERD. Alterations of intercellular glycoconjugates are likely to have a role in the genesis of ISD and GERD.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received: 31 August 1999 / Accepted: 19 October 1999
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Solcia, E., Villani, L., Luinetti, O. et al. Altered intercellular glycoconjugates and dilated intercellular spaces of esophageal epithelium in reflux disease. Virchows Archiv 436, 207–216 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004280050032
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004280050032