Abstract
We present two malignant cases of Sertoli–Leydig cell tumours (SLCT) of the testis and one ovarian SLCT with benign behaviour. The DNA copy number changes affected chromosome 1, 8, 9p, 10, 11, 12, 16, 19, 22 and X. The present study is the first molecular–cytogenetic analysis of Sertoli–Leydig cell tumours of the testis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The Sertoli–Leydig cell tumours (SLCT) are exceptionally rare sex-cord stromal tumours of the testis [10, 18]. There are, however, some few cytogenetic studies of SLCT of the ovary, which revealed genetic aberrations affecting the sex chromosome [1, 3, 4]. Trisomy 8 was detected in a metastasizing ovarian SLCT as sole karyotypic aberration [7]. A case of virilising ovarian SLCT in a 14-year old black girl showed chromosomal rearrangements of chromosome 5, 18, trisomy 6 and 12 [15]. Cytogenetic studies of such tumours located in the testis have never been reported. We analysed therefore the chromosomal aberrations of two testicular and one ovarian SLCT.
Materials and methods
Tumour specimens and immunohistochemistry
Three SLCT, retrieved from the files of the Institute of Pathology Innsbruck (Medical University Innsbruck, Austria) were examined. Tissue sections were stained with haematoxylin and eosin, profiled immunohistochemically and classified according to the WHO classification of testicular tumours [12].
Comparative genomic hybridisation
Comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH) analysis was performed as previously described [17]. Briefly, tumour DNA and reference DNA were labelled with biotin-16-dUTP and digoxigenin-11-dUTP, respectively, by nick translation using a commercially available nick translation kit (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). The probe mixture of 500 ng tumour DNA, 500 ng reference DNA, 20 μg human Cot-1 DNA (Gibco BRL, Life Technologies, Germany) and 10 μg salmon sperm DNA (Eppendorf, Germany) was denatured for 5 min at 75°C and pre-annealed for 20 min at 37°C. The probe mixture was hybridised on a normal, denatured lymphocyte metaphase slide and hybridised 3 days in a humidified chamber. For detection, the slides were stained with avidin–fluorescein isothiocyanate (Vector Labs, Burlingame, CA, USA) and with anti-digoxigenin–rhodamin (Roche, Mannheim, Germany), followed by counter-staining with 4,6-diamino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Serva, Germany). The slides were evaluated using a fluorescence microscope (Zeiss Axioplan) equipped with a CCD camera (JAI M300), specific filter sets and CGH software (ISIS, MetaSystems, Germany).
Gains or losses were calculated as significant by the evaluation software if fluorescence ratio showed borderline values of 0.8 and 1.25, respectively. Pericentromeric, heterochromatic regions, telomeric regions and chromosome Y were excluded from the evaluation.
Fluorescence in situ hybridisation
To evaluate the CGH results, fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) on paraffin-embedded sections was performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Tissue sections (5 μm) were mounted on adhesion slides and dried at 70°C for 30 min. The inter-phase preparation and hybridisation were performed according to the protocol of the manufacturer (Abbott/Vysis, Downers Grove, IL, USA). DNA probes for the centromeric region for chromosome X/Y, 8, two LSI probes for 9p21 and 22q11.2 (Abbott/Vysis) and a locus specific probe on 12q14-15 (YAC probe 745a10, kindly provided by Dr. Kalscheuer, Max Planck Institute, Berlin) were used. At least 100 nuclei in each case were examined.
Results
Pathologic and immunohistochemical findings
Microscopically case 1 (lung metastasis lung metastasis from a 66-year-old male patient) showed uniform cells, arranged in nested tumour formations, with eosinophilic cytoplasm, oval to spindle-shaped cells with not overtly prominent nuclei and an increased mitotic rate (26 mitotic figures/10 HPF). Only the Leydig cell component showed formation of metastases (Fig. 1a, right). The second malignant tumour of the testis from a 75-year-old patient (case 2) showed morphologies of lipid-rich Sertoli-cell components (Fig. 1b, left) and a nested Leydig-cell component (Fig. 1b, right). The tumour showed vascular invasion and an increased mitotic rate (33 mitotic figures/10 HPF).
The cells of case 3 (ovarian SLCT from a 74-year-old woman) appeared bland and uniform; the benign tumour showed Sertoli cells in a trabecular arrangement and islands of Leydig cells. Immunohistochemical analysis showed positivity of the Leydig-cell component of the benign tumour (case 3) for α-inhibin and calretinin whilst both components stained negative for Melan A (A 103). Both malignant tumours (case 1 and 2) were completely negative for these markers (Table 1).
CGH and FISH analysis
All analysed cases showed chromosomal imbalances. Case 1 showed gains and losses involving 10 chromosomes or chromosomal regions. The second case showed gain on the entire chromosome X as sole aberration. The third case was with loss of the entire chromosome 8 and gain of chromosome 19 and 22. CGH profiles and histomorphological features of the tumours are shown in Fig. 1. The FISH results were in agreement with the CGH data. Results of CGH and FISH data are given in Table 2.
Discussion
Sertoli–Leydig tumours of the ovary and the testis are scarce neoplasm [9] exceptionally rare in the testis [10, 18]. Only few cytogenetic studies of ovarian sex-cord stromal tumours and no chromosomal analysis in SLCT of the testis are reported in the literature. The present CGH analysis in two male patients with SLCT is the first study of genetic aberrations in these tumours, affecting entire chromosomes (or chromosome regions) on 1p, 8, 9p, 11q, 12, 16q, 19, 22 X.
Trisomy 8 has been described in fibrosarcomas of the ovary as one of several aberrations [16]. Manegold et al. [7] found trisomy 8 as sole karyotypic aberration in an ovarian metastasizing SLCT. These findings are in contrast to our CGH data. One of the three analysed tumours showed loss and no gain of chromosome 8 (Fig. 1c, left) as part of other chromosomal imbalances.
Simple numeric changes, patriculary trisomy 12 and monosomy 22, have been described as recurrent findings in ovarian sex-cord stromal tumours [13], including granulosa-stromal cell tumours [14], fibrothecomas [16], in sclerosing stromal tumours [5] and ovarian tumours [6, 11]. Also, the CGH and interphase FISH study by Mayr et al. [8] on ovarian granulosa cell tumours corroborate these previous reports of the prevalence of trisomy and monosomy 22. Truss et al. [15] found trisomy 12 in a virilizing ovarian SLCT as part of a number of other aberrations, including an overexpression of the BCL-2 gene, caused by rearrangement of chromosome 18 with a clonal karyotype 48XX,der(5)t(5;18)(p13;q12),+6,+12,der(18)r(5;18)(p15.3p13;p11.3q12).
We found gain of entire chromosome 12 and monosomy 22 in case 1 by CGH. However, a discrepant result regarding chromosome 22 was seen in case 3: not monosomy 22 but gain of chromosome 22 was detected. The FISH analysis confirmed this, showing three to four signals for 22q11.2 in 30% of the analysed nuclei (Table 2). De Giorgi et al. [1] presented a case of ovarian SLCT with endometrioid-like yolk sac tumour in a 26-year-old patient with a 46,XX karyotype with Y-chromosomal material insertion into chromosome 1. A well-differentiated SLCT of the ovary in a 48-old-year Japanese woman with symptoms of virilisation and a 45,X/46XX/47XXX karyotype is reported by Hitosugi et al. [3]. Another Sertoli–Leydig cell tumour in a woman with XO/XX/XXX-mosaicism is reported by Glaser et al. [2]. We provide the first molecular-cytogenetic analysis of testicular SLCT, identifying gain of chromosome X in both analysed cases (case 1 and 2) by CGH. FISH analysis showed two to three copies of chromosome X in both cases; in one of them, loss of chromosome Y was observed in 80% of the analysed nuclei.
In conclusion, aberrations on chromosome 12 and on sex chromosomes suggest associations with oncogenetic mechanisms in these groups of neoplasms. However, the characterisation of SLCT in this study represents an additional contribution to the poorly explored SLCT of the ovary and testis.
References
De Giorgi U, Turci D, Crisanti E, Cantù MG, Cappellini A, Marangolo M (2003) Ovarian Sertoli–Leydig cell tumor, endometrioid-like yolk sac tumor, and Y-chromosomal material. Oncology 64:370–373
Glaser D, Nienhaus H, Kohler R, Walther G, Pawlowitzki IH (1988) A sex cord stromal tumour in a woman with X0/XX/XXX-mosaicism. Arch Gynecol Obstet 243:115–118
Hitosugi M, Matsuoka Y, Irimajiri S, Fukuda J (1997) Sertoli–Leydig cell tumour complicated by X chromosomal mosaicisms. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 47:619–622
Hittmair A, Zelger BG, Obrist P, Dirnhofer S (1997) Ovarian Sertoli–Leydig cell tumor: a SRY gene-independent pathway of pseudomale gonadal differentiation. Hum Pathol 28:1206–1210
Kawauchi S, Tsuji T, Kaku T, Kamura T, Nakano H, Tsuneyoshi M (1998) Sclerosing stromal tumor of the ovary: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, ultrastructural, and cytogenetic analysis with special reference to its vasculature. Am J Surg Pathol 22:83–92
Lindgren V, Waggoner S, Rotmensch J (1996) Monosomy 22 in two ovarian granulosa cell tumors. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 89:93–97
Manegold E, Tietze L, Günther K, Fleischer A, Amo-Takyi BK, Schröder W, Handt S (2001) Trisomy 8 as sole karyotypic aberration in an ovarian metastasizing Sertoli–Leydig cell tumor. Human Pathol 32:559–562
Mayr D, Kaltz-Wittmer C, Arbogast S, Amann G, Aust DE, Diebold J (2002) Characteristic pattern of genetic aberrations in ovarian granulosa cell tumors. Mod Path 15:951–957
Panagiotou JP, Polychronopoulou S, Sofou K, Vanvliet-Constantinidou C, Papandreou E, Haidas S (2006) Second and third malignant solid tumor in a girl with ovarian Sertoli–Leydig tumor. Pediatr Blood Cancer 46:654–656
Perito PE, Ciancio G, Civantos F, Politano VA (1992) Sertoli–Leydig cell testicular tumor: case report and review of sex cord/gonadal stromal tumor histogenesis. J Urol 148:883–885
Persons DL, Hartmann LC, Herath JF, Keeney GL, Jenkins RB (1994) Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of trisomy 12 in ovarian tumors. Am J Clin Pathol 102:775–779
Sesterhenn IA, Cheville J, Wooward PJ, Damjanov I, Jacobsen GK, Nistal M, Paniagua R, Renshaw AA (2004) Germ cell tumours. In: Eble JN, Sauter G, Epstein JI, Sesterhenn IA (eds) Pathology and genetics: tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs. IARC Press, Lyon, pp 251–258
Shashi V, Golden WL, von Kap-Herr C, Andersen WA, Gaffey MJ (1994) Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization for trisomy 12 on archival ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors. Gynecol Oncol 55:349–354
Taruscio D, Carcangiu ML, Ward DC (1993) Detection of trisomy 12 on ovarian sex cord stromal tumors by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Diagn Mol Pathol 2:94–98
Truss L, Dobin SM, Rao A, Donner LR (2004) Overexpression of the BCL2 gene in a Sertoli–Leydig cell tumor of the ovary: a pathologic and cytogenetic study. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 148:118–122
Tsuji T, Kawauchi S, Utsunomija T, Nagata Y, Tsuneyoshi M (1997) Fibrosarcoma versus cellular fibroma of the ovary: a comparative study of their proliferative activity and chromosome aberrations using MIB-1 immunostaining, DNA flow cytometry, and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Am J Surg Pathol 21:52–59
Wolff E, Girod S, Liehr T, Vorderwulbecke U, Ries J, Steininger H, Gebhart E (1998) Oral squamous cell carcinomas are characterized by a rather uniform pattern of genomic imbalances detected by comparative genomic hybridisation. Oral Oncol 34:186–190
Young RH (1993) Sertoli–Leydig cell tumors of the ovary: review with emphasis on historical aspects and unusual variants. Int J Gynecol Pathol 12:141–147
Acknowledgements
The present case report is part of a study of Leydig cell tumours, supported by the Austrian Cancer Society/Tyrol.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Verdorfer, I., Horst, D., Höllrigl, A. et al. Sertoli–Leydig cell tumours of the ovary and testis: a CGH and FISH study. Virchows Arch 450, 267–271 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-006-0344-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-006-0344-9