Abstract
Main conclusion
A lncRNA MtCIR1 negatively regulates the response to salt stress in Medicago truncatula seed germination by modulating seedling growth and ABA metabolism and signaling by enhancing Na+ accumulation.
Abstract
Increasing evidence suggests that long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are involved in the regulation of plant tolerance to varying abiotic stresses. A large number of lncRNAs that are responsive to abiotic stress have been identified in plants; however, the mechanisms underlying the regulation of plant responses to abiotic stress by lncRNAs are largely unclear. Here, we functionally characterized a salt stress-responsive lncRNA derived from the leguminous model plant M. truncatula, referred to as MtCIR1, by expressing MtCIR1 in Arabidopsis thaliana in which no such homologous sequence was observed. Expression of MtCIR1 rendered seed germination more sensitive to salt stress by enhanced accumulation of abscisic acid (ABA) due to suppressing the expression of the ABA catabolic enzyme CYP707A2. Expression of MtCIR1 also suppressed the expression of genes associated with ABA receptors and signaling. The ABA-responsive gene AtPGIP2 that was involved in degradation of cell wall during seed germination was up-regulated by expressing MtCIR1. On the other hand, expression of MtCIR1 in Arabidopsis thaliana enhanced foliar Na+ accumulation by down-regulating genes encoding Na+ transporters, thus rendering the transgenic plants more sensitive to salt stress. These results demonstrate that the M. truncatula lncRNA MtCIR1 negatively regulates salt stress response by targeting ABA metabolism and signaling during seed germination and foliar Na+ accumulation by affecting Na+ transport under salt stress during seedling growth. These novel findings would advance our knowledge on the regulatory roles of lncRNAs in response of plants to salt stress.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Non-coding RNAs with a length greater than 200 nucleotides are defined as long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), which have little or no capacity of protein-coding potential (Ponting et al. 2009; Ariel et al. 2015). LncRNAs can be classified into intronic non-coding RNAs, intergenic non-coding RNAs, and natural antisense non-coding RNAs (NATs) according to their genomic localization (Ponting et al. 2009; Wang et al. 2014a, b; Ariel et al. 2015). Numerous lncRNAs in plants have been identified by high-throughput sequencing technology (Zhu et al. 2013; Li et al. 2014; Deng et al. 2018; Huanca-Mamani et al. 2018; Zhao et al. 2018). Plant lncRNAs regulate gene expression via a series of complex mechanisms (Kornienko et al. 2013; Liu et al. 2015). The involvement of lncRNAs in regulation of physiological processes in response of plants to abiotic stress is emerging. For example, cabbage lncRNA BoNR8 negatively regulates Arabidopsis tolerance to salt stress by affecting seed germination, primary root, and silique growth (Wu et al. 2019). Salt stress-related LncRNA973 is reported to enhance tolerance of cotton to salt stress by modulating the expression of a series of genes involved in response to salt stress (Zhang et al. 2019). Nonetheless, the molecular mechanisms underlying the gene regulation by lncRNAs remain largely unknown. Several lncRNAs have been identified to be responsive to cold, salt, and osmotic stresses in M. truncatula (Wang et al. 2015a, b; Zhao et al. 2020). However, the functional characterization of M. truncatula lncRNAs involved in salt stress is still in its infancy.
Salt stress adversely affects seed germination, root growth, and seedling development (Zhu 2002, 2016; Ketehouli et al. 2019). Compared with other developmental stages of plants, seed germination is more sensitive to salt stress (Manz et al. 2005; Finch-Savage and Leubner-Metzger 2006; Nonogaki et al. 2010; Rajjou et al. 2012). Seed germination starts with the uptake of water by the mature dry seeds, and ends with the radicle protruding the endosperm and seed coat. This process is regulated by both environmental and hormonal cues (Alboresi et al. 2005; Cheng et al. 2016; Liu et al. 2016). Plants can quickly sense and respond to external cues by complex mechanisms, resulting in a set of changes in metabolism, physiology and development (Yamaguchi-Shinozaki and Shinozaki 2006; Shinozaki and Yamaguchi-Shinozaki 2007). The biosynthesis and accumulation of ABA are the most common phenomenon in response to abiotic stress including salt, drought and cold stress (Wilkinson and Davies 2002; Xu et al. 2013). ABA plays a pivotal role in the regulation of response and adaption of plants to abiotic stress by sensing and transducing stress signals, as well as modulating numerous gene expressions (Cutler et al. 2010). Many developmental processes, such as seed germination, early seedlings growth, lateral root formation, leaf senescence, and stomatal closure, are regulated by ABA (Wang et al. 2020). In addition, ABA is also involved in the control of plant water status by regulating stomata under abiotic stress, e.g., salt stress (Vishwakarma et al. 2017). Recent studies have reported that the lncRNA DRIR regulates ABA-mediated drought and salt stress responses (Qin et al. 2017).
ABA metabolism is sensitive to salt stress, such that ABA concentration is enhanced under salt stress (Wang et al. 2015a, b). Seed germination is inhibited under salt stress by suppressing water uptake and endosperm rupture (Koornneef et al. 2002; Yuan et al. 2011). ABA concentration is a key regulator in the control of seed germination and dormancy. For example, in Arabidopsis, the catabolic enzyme CYP707A2 is involved in down-regulation of ABA levels during seed imbibition (Kushiro et al. 2004). Moreover, genes involved in ABA biosynthesis are often up-regulated, thereby leading to an increase in planta ABA level, which in turn activates the ABA-responsive target genes through ABA-responsive elements (ABREs) in their promoters (Guo et al. 2011). ABA signaling is perceived by a group of receptors that belong to the PYR/ PYL/RCAR family and ABA co-receptors of the PP2C family (Miyazono et al. 2009; Park et al. 2009). ABA binding to the receptors activates the subsequent kinase activity of SnRKs. SnRKs phosphorylate downstream components, such as ABA-responsive element-binding factors (AREBs/ABFs), to regulate the expression of ABA-responsive genes (Miyazono et al. 2009). ABI1 and ABI2, which encode protein phosphatases, have been reported to negatively regulate ABA signaling during seed dormancy and germination (Nakashima and Yamaguchi-Shinozaki 2013). ABI3, ABI4, and ABI5 genes encode transcription factors that regulate ABA responses during seed germination and vegetative growth (Lopez-Molina et al. 2002; Finkelstein et al. 2005; Zhang et al. 2005; Khandelwal et al. 2010).
Arabidopsis polygalacturonase inhibitors of PGIP1 and PGIP2 are associated with seed germination (Kanai et al. 2010). Pectin is a main mucilage in seed coat (Ferrari et al. 2002). Breakdown of the seed pectin can soften seed coat and promote seed coat rupture, thus facilitating seed germination (Kanai et al. 2010). Overexpression of PGIP1 and PGIP2 prevents mucilage degradation due to disruption of pectin degradation (Kanai et al. 2010). Given that PGIP1 and PGIP2 are direct targets of ABI5 (Kumar et al. 2019), it is likely that ABI5 acts as a master regulator of seed germination through the ABA signaling pathway. However, there have been no studies linking lncRNAs to ABA-dependent, PGIPs-mediated seed germination under salt stress.
The excessive accumulation of Na+ by plants is a key factor to adversely affect cell division, photosynthesis and development (Horie and Schroeder 2004; Julkowska and Testerink 2015). Therefore, maintaining a low Na+ concentration in the cytoplasm is critical to improve tolerance to salt stress. Plants have evolved mechanisms to maintain the low cytoplasmic Na+ under salt stress. Among them, salt overly sensitive genes (SOSs) pathways play important roles in excluding excess Na+ out of the cell via Na+/H+ antiporters in the plasma membrane (Zhu et al. 1998). Under salt stress, excessive Na+ in the cytoplasm initiates a calcium signal that activates the SOS3–SOS2 protein kinase complex, which in turn stimulates the Na+/H+ activity of SOS1, leading to export of Na+ from the plant cells (Ishitani et al. 2000; Liu et al. 2000; Shi et al. 2000; Zhu 2001; Qiu et al. 2002). SOS3–SOS2 complex may also positively regulate the activities of vacuolar Na+/H+ exchangers NHX to maintain a low cytoplasmic Na+ by sequestrating Na+ into the vacuoles (Blumwald 2000; Batelli et al. 2007). In Arabidopsis, NHX is a potential Na+/H+ exchanger, which transports Na+ from the cytoplasm to the vacuole (Yu et al. 2008). Overexpression of AtNHX1 enhances the tolerance of Arabidopsis plants to salt stress (Apse et al. 1999). In addition, HKT1 is another membrane transport protein mediating Na+ influx into plant cells. The first member of HKT family was cloned in wheat (Rus et al. 2001; Laurie et al. 2002). AtHKT1 plays a key role in plant tolerance to salt stress by regulating Na+ entry from xylem vessels to xylem parenchyma cells, leading to a decrease of Na+ in xylem vessels and leaves (Sunarpi et al. 2005).
A cold-responsive lncRNA MtCIR1 in the legume model plant M. truncatula was identified in our previous studies (Zhao et al. 2020). The MtCIR1 target genes were predicted to be involved in varying biological processes including defense response and regulation of transcription under abiotic stress (Zhao et al. 2020). However, the physiological functions of MtCIR1 remain to be characterized. In the present study, we further investigated the roles of MtCIR1 in regulation of response to salt stress by expressing the MtCIR1 in A. thaliana, and functionally characterized its role in response to salt stress during seed germination and seedling growth. We found that expression of MtCIR1 in Arabidopsis rendered the transgenic plants sensitive to salt stress during seed germination and seedlings growth, and explored the mechanisms by which MtCIR1 negatively regulates responses to salt stress.
Materials and methods
Plasmid construction and transgenic plant generation of A. thaliana
The full-length cDNA sequence of MtCIR1 was amplified using primers as follows:
5′-TCGGCGCGCCGGTGTAGCTAAACCCTATGA-3′ (AscI site underlined) and 5′-GTTAATTAATGTCCTCTTTTATTGCTATCA-3′ (PacI site underlined). The sequencing confirmed that PCR fragments were directionally cloned into a pMDC32 vector driven by the two constitutive cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoters to create the pMDC32-MtCIR1 construct (Supplementary Fig. S1) (Zhang et al. 2016). These vectors were introduced into the Agrobacterium tumefaciens EHA105 strain for transformation of A. thaliana (ecotype Columbia 0) using the Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated floral dip method (Clough and Bent 1998). MtCIR1 transgenic lines were identified by DNA-PCR using primers designed on both side sequences of MtCIR1 insertion point in pMDC32. pMDC32-up: 5′-AGGACCTCGACTCTAGAGGATC-3′. pMDC32-Down: 5′-TTGCCAAATGT TTGAAGCATCG-3′. Two independent homozygous lines (L-2 and L-4) of the T3 generation were randomly selected and were used for subsequent salt-stress tolerance tests (Supplementary Fig. S2).
Plant growth and stress treatments
Seeds of A. thaliana WT and MtCIR1 transgenic lines were surface-sterilized in 75% (v/v) ethanol for 0.5 min and 10% (v/v) sodium hypochlorite for 15 min in sequence. After rinsing several times with sterilized distilled water, the seeds were grown on 1/2 Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium (1% sucrose, 0.7% agar, pH 5.8) in the green house with a 14 h light, 22 °C/10 h, 20 °C dark cycle, light intensity is 120 μmol m−2 s−1. Seed germination was defined as the emergence of the radicle break through the seed coat. The seed germination rate was continuously counted for a week. Approximately 100 seeds per sample in each treatment were tested for the determination of seed germination rate and each treatment had at least five replicates.
For the analysis of root growth responding to salt stress and ABA treatment, seeds of A. thaliana WT and MtCIR1 transgenic lines were surface-sterilized in 75% (v/v) ethanol and 10% (v/v) sodium hypochlorite in sequence. After rinsing several times with sterilized distilled water, the seeds were grown on 1/2 MS medium (1% sucrose, 0.7% agar, pH 5.8) with or without 100 mM NaCl. The primary root length was monitored after the seedlings vertically grown for 10 days in the green house with a 14 h light, 120 μmol m−2 s−1, 22 °C/10 h, 20 °C dark cycle.
To analyze stress responses in seedling development stage, we examined salt stress and ABA treatment on seedlings, respectively. For the NaCl treatment, surface-sterilized seeds were sown onto 1/2MS medium (1% sucrose, 0.7% agar, pH 5.8) and were stratified at 4 °C for 2 d. After growth in the green house for 5 days, Arabidopsis seedlings were transferred to 1/2 MS medium (1% sucrose, 0.7% agar, pH 5.8) with or without 75 mM NaCl for an additional 4 days. The growth conditions are 14 h light, 22 °C/10 h, 20 °C dark cycle, and light intensity of 120 μmol m−2 s−1. Survival seedling was referred to that with one green leaf at least. For NaCl treatment of soil-grown seedlings, 4-week-old seedlings were irrigated with 100 mM NaCl for every two weeks and total of 4 times. After 2 months of treatment, they were watered with 1/2 MS solution. Plants were considered dead if all leaves were yellow and did not restore growth after recovery for 7 days.
To evaluate the effect of ABA on seedling growth, surface-sterilized seeds were sown onto 1/2MS medium (1% sucrose, 0.7% agar, pH 5.8) and were placed at 4 °C for 2 d.
After that, the plates were move to the green house with a 14 h light, 22 °C/10 h, 20 °C dark cycle, and light intensity of 120 μmol m−2 s−1. Five-d-old seedlings grown on 1/2 MS medium (1% sucrose, 0.7% agar, pH 5.8) were transferred to 1/2 MS medium (1% sucrose, 0.7% agar, pH 5.8) supplemented with different concentrations of ABA. Green leaves were scored from third to sixth day, and seedling survival rates were scored after treatment for 6 days.
Analysis of GUS activity
The MtCIR1 promoter fragment (1.76 kb, − 1760 to − 1 upstream of MtCIR1 sequence) was amplified and cloned into pEASY-T3 vector, after sequencing verification, the MtCIR1 promoter on the pEASY-T3 vector was transferred to pENTR4 through the EcoRI site. Finally, MtCIR1 recombined with pHGWFS7.0 (Supplemental Fig. S3). After sequence confirmation, the terminal construct pMtCIR1-GUS was transformed into Arabidopsis using Agrobacterium tumefaciens (strain EHA105)-mediated floral dip method (Clough and Bent 1998). For analysis of the β-glucuronidase (GUS), plant samples were first fixed in 90% acetone for 10 min, then washed thoroughly with GUS staining buffer and vacuumed for 20 min. After that, plant materials were stained in GUS staining buffer at 37 °C overnight followed by decoloring with 30%, 50%, 70%, 85% ethanol for 30 min, respectively. Finally, 95% ethanol was used to decolorize until the chlorophyll was completely removed. Samples were observed and photographed using Leica Smart 3D Digital Microscope.
Analysis of gene expression during seed imbibition
Seeds of A. thaliana WT and MtCIR1 transgenic lines were surface-sterilized in 75% (v/v) ethanol for 0.5 min and 10% (v/v) sodium hypochlorite for 15 min in sequence. After rinsing several times with sterilized distilled water, about one-hundred seeds were placed on filter paper soaked with different treatment solutions. After the imbibition for 0, 3, 6, and 12 h, seeds were collected and stored in – 80 °C after quick freezing in liquid nitrogen. RNA was extracted and quantitative real-time PCR was used to detect the expression level of genes under different treatments.
Determination of the endogenous ABA level
For estimation of endogenous ABA levels of germinating seeds, Arabidopsis WT and transgenic L-2 and L-4 seeds were surface-sterilized and spread on sterilized filter paper, soaked with 1/2 MS medium (1% sucrose, pH 5.8) with or without 150 mM NaCl. The germinated seeds treated with or without 150 mM NaCl were collected on the 5th and 2nd day after imbibition, respectively. Approximately 200 mg fresh weight (FW) germinating seeds were homogenized under liquid nitrogen, weighted and extracted for 24 h with methanol and 2H6-ABA. Endogenous ABA was purified and measured as previously described (Fu et al. 2012) with some modifications in detection conditions. Briefly, LC–MS/MS analysis was performed on a UPLC system (Waters) coupled to the 6500 Qtrap system (AB SCIEX). LC separation used a BEH C18 column (1.7 μm, 100 × 2.1 mm; Waters) with mobile phase A, 0.05% (v/v) acetic acid in water and B, 0.05% (v/v) acetic acid in acetonitrile. The gradient was set with initial 20% B and increased to 70% B within 6 min. ABA was detected in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode with transition. The MRM transitions for ABA and [2H6]-ABA are 263.0 > 153.1 and 269.2 > 159.2. Three biological replicates were analyzed for each treatment.
RNA isolation and quantitative real-time PCR analysis
For gene expression analysis, total RNA was isolated using Omini Plant RNA Kit (with DNase I) (CW2598S). About 1 μg RNA was reverse-transcribed into first-strand cDNA with Evo M-MLV RT kit (AG11711). Real-time quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed using ABI Stepone Plus Instrument. We reverse-transcribed 30 μL cDNA, diluted 10 times with ddH2O, and took 4.2 μL of the diluted cDNA for Q-PCR. Each reaction contained 5.0 μL of SYBR Green Master Mix reagent (AG11701), 4.2 μL cDNA samples, 0.2 μL ROX Reference Dye, and 0.6 μL of 10 μM gene-specific primers in a final volume of 10.0 μL. The reaction was performed using a two-step method. The first step was 95 °C for 1 min as the initial denaturation, the second step was 40 cycles of 95 °C for 20 s, 56 °C for 20 s and 72 °C for 25 s for amplification. The relative expression level was analyzed by normalized with Arabidopsis AtACTIN7 gene. For each sample, the mean value from three qRT-PCR data was adapted to calculate the transcript abundance. Gene-specific primers required for the experiment are shown in Supplementary Table S1. All the primers are specific and have no extra products in the melting curve.
Measurement of Na+ and K+ concentrations
Four-week-old seedlings of WT and transgenic lines were irrigated with 1/2 MS solution with or without 300 mM NaCl for 7 days. The leaves were harvested, and washed with ddH2O for several times, dried and weighed. Fifty milligrams of dry materials were placed in a digestion tube, and suspended in 5 mL of premium pure concentrated nitric acid for overnight. One milliliter of 30% hydrogen peroxide was added to the digested tissue powder, and microwave system (MARS, CEM) was used to completely digest for 1.5 h. The digested solution was diluted with double distilled water to 50 mL. The K+ and Na+ contents were detected by ICP-AES (Thermo). The expressions of AtSOS1, AtSOS2, AtSOS3, AtNHX1, and AtHKT1 in leaves were detected after four-week-old seedlings of WT, and transgenic lines were irrigated with 1/2 MS solution with or without 300 mM NaCl for 7 days.
Statistical analysis
All experiments in this study were repeated independently at least three times. The results are given means ± SE. The statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics software.
Results
Expression patterns of MtCIR1 in Arabidopsis transgenic lines
MtCIR1 was identified as a cold-responsive long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) in our previous study (Zhao et al. 2020). Based on the low conservation characteristics of lncRNAs, MtCIR1 gene sequence was analyzed by NCBI BLAST, and no homologous sequence was found in A. thaliana. To functionally characterize MtCIR1, we expressed the MtCIR1 in Arabidopsis under the control of two CaMV35S promoters. Genome PCR analysis results showed that the MtCIR1 gene was integrated into the Arabidopsis genome. A number of transgenic lines were obtained, and two independent transgenic lines (L-2 and L-4) were randomly selected for further research (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. S2). Real-time RT-PCR of RNA extracted from transgenic L-2 and L-4 showed that MtCIR1 gene was expressed in all of the organs examined, with the highest expression in roots and lowest in leaves, inflorescence and silique, respectively (Fig. 1b). To confirm these results, PMtCIR1: GUS Arabidopsis transgenic lines were obtained, in which the GUS reporter gene was placed under the control of a 1761 bp MtCIR1 promoter.
During seed germination, MtCIR1 was first expressed in cotyledon vascular tissues, and gradually expanded to cotyledon mesophyll and radicle vascular tissues (Fig. 1c). In 3- to 7-day-old seedlings, GUS activity was strong in all organs except root tips (Fig. 1d). In 14-day-old seedling, GUS staining signal was also strong in the root and cotyledon, but only weak GUS signal was detected at the apical point of leaf (Fig. 1d). Consistent with the real-time RT-PCR results, the strongest GUS signals were detected in primary roots of 7-d old seedlings (Fig. 1d). While GUS signal was strong in stamens of adult plants, none GUS signal was detected in pedicel, calyx, and silique (Fig. 1d). These results suggest that the expression and tissue localization of MtCIR1 in Arabidopsis are closely related to the developmental stage.
Expression of MtCIR1 was suppressed by salt stress and ABA treatment
To functionally characterize MtCIR1 in response to salt stress, we first determined its transcriptome profiles under salt stress. A reduction in the MtCIR1 transcript was observed in the two transgenic lines when treated with NaCl for 2 h and 5 h (Fig. 2a, b). Moreover, we examined the effects of several plant hormones on the transcript level of MtCIR1. Exogenous application of plant hormones to the Arabidopsis seedlings led to a down-regulation of MtCIR1 expression to varying degrees. Among the plant hormones, ABA suppressed expression of MtCIR1, and the ABA-induced down-regulation of MtCIR1 exhibited similar patterns to that of NaCl treatment (Fig. 2c, d). The identical sensitivity of MtCIR1 to ABA and NaCl treatment may imply that ABA is involved in the regulation of responses to salt stress by MtCIR1.
MtCIR1 negatively regulates salt tolerance
The function of MtCIR1 in responses to salt stress was characterized by measuring seed germination, primary root elongation and seedling growth. Seed germination rates of the transgenic line L-2 were significantly lower than WT after imbibition for 2 days in the absence of NaCl (Fig. 3a). Treatment with NaCl suppressed germination rates for both WT and two transgenic lines, and the NaCl-induced reduction in seed germination rate in the transgenic lines was significantly higher than WT (Fig. 3b). The suppression of seed germination rate by NaCl was specific to Na+ as the identical concentration of KCl did not affect seed germination for both WT and transgenic lines (Fig. 3c).
In addition to seed germination, we also evaluated the effects of salt stress on root elongation. Root length of WT and the two transgenic lines was comparable under control conditions, and treatment with NaCl equally suppressed root elongation for WT and transgenic plants (Fig. 3e, f). We further monitored the effects of NaCl on survival of seedling growth, and found that the two transgenic lines were more sensitive to NaCl treatment in terms of survival rate (Fig. 3g–j).
MtCIR1-mediated seed germination under salt stress occurred in an ABA-dependent manner
To test whether ABA is involved in the MtCIR1-mediated seed germination to salt stress, the effects of ABA on seed germination rates of the two transgenic lines and WT were examined. No differences in seed germination rates between MtCIR1 transgenic lines and WT were detected in the absence of ABA during 7 days except the second day, which the germination rate of transgenic line L-2 was significantly lower than that of the WT (Fig. 4a). Seed germination of the WT and MtCIR1 transgenic lines was delayed significantly upon exposure to ABA, and seed germination in the transgenic lines was more sensitive to ABA than that of WT (Fig. 4b). Furthermore, we determined ABA concentrations in seeds of WT and MtCIR1 transgenic lines treated with or without NaCl. ABA concentrations in seeds of MtCIR1 transgenic line L-4 were higher than in seeds of WT and L-2 line after imbibition in the control condition without NaCl treatment. Exposure to NaCl led to significant increases in ABA concentrations in seeds of both WT and transgenic lines, with ABA concentrations in seeds of the transgenic lines higher than that in WT (Fig. 4d). The ABA concentrations were negatively correlated with seed germination rates (Fig. 4c). In addition, we analyzed the expression of several genes involved in ABA catabolism, including CYP707A1, CYP707A2, CYP707A3, and CYP707A4. Expression of AtCYP707A2 was the highest, followed by AtCYP707A1 and AtCYP707A3, and the expression of AtCYP707A4 was not detected during Arabidopsis seed germination (Fig. 4e, Supplementary Fig. S4). Expression of AtCYP707A2 in Arabidopsis WT seeds rapidly increased and peaked after 3 h imbibed on medium without NaCl, exposure to NaCl led to greater up-regulation of AtCYP707A2. The NaCl-induced up-regulation of AtCYP707A2 was almost abolished in the two transgenic lines (Fig. 4e).
To clarify whether the MtCIR1 may also affect ABA signaling in response to salt stress during seed germination, we compared expression of 14 AtRCARs and 5 AtABIs genes associated with ABA signal transduction between WT and the transgenic lines in the absence and presence of NaCl in the medium (Figs. 5 and 6, Supplementary Figs. S5, S6, and S7). During seed germination, the expressions of five AtRCARs, such as RCAR1, RCAR5, RCAR8, RCAR9, and RCAR10 (Fig. 5a–f), five ABIs including ABI1, ABI2, ABI3, ABI4, and ABI5 (Fig. 6a–e) in WT seeds were induced after 6 h imbibition under ABA and salt stress, while the expression of these genes in MtCIR1 transgenic lines was little changed in response to ABA and salt stress.
The accumulation of PGIPs may lead to impaired germination by the inhibition of pectin degradation (Ferrari et al. 2002; Kanai et al. 2010). The expression of two PGIPs was monitored in response to ABA and salt stress (Fig. 7, Supplementary Fig. S8). Both the expressions of AtPGIP1 and AtPGIP2 in WT seeds were decreased by these two treatments during imbibition. By contrast, transcripts of AtPGIP1 and AtPGIP2 in seeds of transgenic lines were up-regulated when treated by NaCl and ABA (Fig. 7a, b). These results suggest that suppression of seed germination by MtCIR1 may occur by positively modulating the expressions of AtPGIPs during salt stress and ABA treatment.
MtCIR1-mediated response to salt stress involves Na+ and K+ accumulation by plants
To further unveil the mechanisms by which MtCIR1 transgenic plants became more sensitive to salt stress than WT, effects of salt stress on Na+ and K+ concentrations as well as Na+/K+ ratios in leaves of WT and transgenic plants were investigated. There were marked increases in Na+ concentrations both in WT and transgenic plants upon exposure to NaCl, but the magnitude of increase was greater in transgenic plant than in WT plants, thus leading to a higher Na+ concentration in transgenic plants than in WT plants (Fig. 8a). In contrast to Na+, K+ concentrations in leaves of transgenic lines were lower than WT plants when treated with NaCl (Fig. 8b). The higher Na+ and lower K+ concentrations in the transgenic lines led to higher Na+/K+ ratio in transgenic lines than in WT plants under salt stress (Fig. 8c).
We further monitored the effects of salt stress on expression patterns of AtSOS1, AtSOS2, AtSOS3, AtNHX1 and AtHKT1 that are key components involved in Na+ accumulation in Arabidopsis plants. Expression of MtCIR1 in Arabidopsis led to down-regulation of AtSOS1 and AtSOS2 in transgenic plants under salt stress (Fig. 9a, b). However, AtSOS3 expression in transgenic plants was significantly lower than in WT plants under both control and salt stress (Fig. 9c). In addition, salt stress significantly increased AtNHX1 expression in both WT and transgenic plants, with the AtNHX1 expression in transgenic plant being lower than that of WT plants, indicating that MtCIR1 may suppress Na+ flux into the vacuole by regulating NHX transporter (Fig. 9d). On the contrary, expression of AtHKT1 in both WT and transgenic plants was equally suppressed upon exposure to NaCl (Fig. 9e), suggesting that the HKT may not be involved in regulation of MtCIR1-depedent Na+ acquisition.
Discussion
We identified a cold-responsive lncRNA, MtCIR1, in M. truncatula previously (Zhao et al. 2020). In the present study, we functionally characterized MtCIR1 by expressing this gene in Arabidopsis that does not contain the homologous sequence, and compared the response of the transgenic plants to salt stress with that of WT plants. One important finding is that the MtCIR1 negatively regulates the response of Arabidopsis to salt stress during seed germination and seedling growth (cf. Fig. 3). We further explored the physiological mechanisms underlying the negative regulation of salt stress response by MtCIR1. Our results revealed that the effect of MtCIR1 on seed germination under salt stress was achieved in an ABA-dependent manner (Figs. 4, 5, and 6), while the effect of MtCIR1 on seedling growth under salt stress was mainly accounted for by excessive accumulation of Na+ due to down-regulation of SOS systems (Figs. 8 and 9). These findings provide experimental evidence in support of the involvement of lncRNAs in the regulation of response to salt stress.
Despite identification of numerous abiotic stress-related lncRNAs in higher plants, only a small number of lncRNAs have been functionally characterized in response to abiotic stresses (Wang et al. 2015a, b; Chen et al. 2016). For example, the lncRNA At5NC056820 improves drought tolerance in Arabidopsis by enhancing accumulation of free proline (Wu et al. 2017). A nuclear-located lncRNA973 was found to act as a positive regulator in response to salt stress in cotton (Zhang et al. 2019). Inconsistent with the function of MtCIR1, lncRNA354 and BoNR8 have been reported to act as negative factors to regulate responses to salt stress. Overexpression of lncRNA354 inhibited plant growth and reduced tolerance to salt stress in cotton (Zhang et al. 2021). Overexpression of cabbage lncRNA BoNR8 in Arabidopsis made seed germination more sensitive to salt stress (Wu et al. 2019). Our results that the lncRNA MtCIR1 negatively regulated seed germination under salt stress would extend our knowledge on the physiological function of lncRNAs in the regulation of salt response in plants. In addition, we found that ABA was involved in the regulation of seed germination by MtCIR1 under salt stress.
The plant hormone ABA plays a critical role in regulating responses of plants to abiotic stress (Holbrook et al. 2002; Verslues and Zhu 2007; Luo et al. 2013). The endogenous ABA content was significantly increased upon exposure to drought and salt stress (Yamaguchi-Shinozaki and Shinozaki 2006; Cutler et al. 2010; Kim et al. 2010). ABA has also been reported to regulate stomatal closure, ion accumulation, and ROS scavenging under abiotic stress (Nakashima and Yamaguchi-Shinozaki 2013; Munemasa et al. 2015; Sah et al. 2016). Similar to our results, recent studies also showed the involvement of lncRNAs in phytohormone-mediated responses to the environmental stress. For example, some lncRNAs positively responded to salt stress by targeting ABA signaling cascades in tomato (Li et al. 2022). A lncRNA DRIR in Arabidopsis was reported to regulate plant tolerance to salt and drought stress in an ABA-dependent manner (Qin et al. 2017).
In the present study, we demonstrated that MtCIR1 regulated ABA-mediated salt stress response. The expression of MtCIR1 was suppressed by salt stress and exogenous application of ABA (Fig. 2). Further analysis revealed that expression of MtCIR1 in Arabidopsis led to greater ABA accumulation under salt stress by negatively regulating expression of ABA catabolic gene CYP707A2 (Fig. 4). These findings provide experimental evidence in support of involvement of ABA in the lncRNA MtCIR1-mediated seed germination under salt stress. We further dissected the mechanisms underlying the ABA-dependent seed germination under salt stress. We found that expression of genes associated with ABA receptors and signal transduction was suppressed in response to salt stress and ABA treatment in MtCIR1 transgenic Arabidopsis (Figs. 5 and 6), suggesting that MtCIR1 may inhibit seed germination and post-germination plant growth by negatively regulating ABA signaling. These results are supported by a large number of studies that the ABA receptors PYR/PYL/RCAR and many ABA signal transduction genes affect seed germination and early seedling growth in Arabidopsis (Park et al. 2009; Huang et al. 2016; Miao et al. 2018). In addition to ABA signal transduction-related genes, the expression of polygalacturonase inhibitory protein-encoding genes PGIPs was investigated in this study. PGIPs are polygalacturonase inhibitor involved in the cell wall pectin-depolymerizing (Kalunke et al. 2015; Rathinam et al. 2020). Kanai et al. (2010) reported that PED3, a peroxisomal ABC transporter, promoted seed germination by suppressing PGIPs via an ABI5-dependent manner. Our results showed that MtCIR1 up-regulated AtPGIPs expression under salt stress, implying that pectin degradation may also be involved in the suppression of seed germination by MtCIR1 under salt stress (Fig. 7 and Supplementary Fig. S8).
ABA has been reported to enhance Na+ exclusion from the cytosol and sequestration into the vacuoles via modifying the plasma membrane ATPase and vacuolar ATPase, thereby alleviating Na+ toxicity to plants (Mansour et al. 2003). Na+ sequestration into the vacuoles by the vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporter NHX1 is an effective cellular mechanism to reduce Na+ toxicity of under salt stress (Yokoi et al. 2002). In this study, we found that salt stress significantly increased AtNHX1 expression in both WT and transgenic plants with the AtNHX1 expression in transgenic plant being lower than that of WT plants, indicating that MtCIR1 may suppress Na+ flux into the vacuole by regulating NHX transporter (Fig. 9d). Expression of MtCIR1 did not alter the sensitivity of root elongation, chlorosis and survival rate to ABA (Supplementary Fig. S9 and Supplementary Fig. S10). The regulation of MtCIR1 on salt sensitivity at seedling stage appears to be independent of the ABA pathway. The MOCA1 gene encodes an inositol phosphorylceramide glucuronosyltransferase (IPUT1), an enzyme catalyzing the biosynthesis of the sphingolipid glycosyl inositol phosphorylceramide (GIPC) (Jiang et al. 2019). Like the MtCIR1 transgenic plants, mutation of MOCA1 led to increased sensitivity of moca1 mutant seedlings to treatment with NaCl, but the mutation did not affect the response of moca1 mutant seedlings to ABA, indicating that the MOCA1 functions specifically in mediating Na+ signaling. The similar response to salt stress and ABA treatment between MtCIR1 transgenic plants and moca1 mutant suggests that MtCIR1 and MOCA1 may have some correlations in response to salt stress, which warrants further investigation.
In summary, we functionally characterized an lncRNA MtCIR1 from legume M. truncatula by expressing it in Arabidopsis. We demonstrated that expression of MtCIR1 rendered the transgenic lines more sensitive to NaCl treatments during seed germination and seedlings development. We further discovered that the MtCIR1-mediated seed germination under salt stress was dependent on ABA metabolism and signaling, while expression of MtCIR1 resulted in greater foliar accumulation of Na+ via SOS-dependent manners, thus making the transgenic lines more sensitive to salt stress. These novel findings could shed new light on the regulatory roles of lncRNAs in response to salt stress, they may also contribute to development of crops tolerant to salt stress by manipulating the expression of lncRNAs.
Author contribution statement
The authors have made the following declarations about their contributions: MZ and WZ designed the experiments. MZ, RT and XS, CL and JC performed the experiments and analyzed data. MZ, RT and WZ wrote the manuscript.
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed Science and Technology Department of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (grant number 2021ZD004502; 2021GG0372) during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.
References
Alboresi A, Gestin C, Leydecker MT, Bedu M, Meyer C, Truong HN (2005) Nitrate, a signal relieving seed dormancy in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Environ 28:500–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01292.x
Apse MP, Aharon GS, Snedden WA, Blumwald E (1999) Salt tolerance conferred by overexpression of a vacuolar Na+/H+ antiport in Arabidopsis. Science 285:1256–1258. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.285.5431.1256
Ariel F, Romero-Barrios N, Jégu T, Benhamed M, Crespi M (2015) Battles and hijacks: noncoding transcription in plants. Trends Plant Sci 20:362–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2015.03.003
Batelli G, Verslues PE, Agius F, Qiu Q, Fujii H, Pan S, Schumaker KS, Grillo S, Zhu JK (2007) SOS2 promotes salt tolerance in part by interacting with the vaculoar H+-ATPase and upregulating its transport activity. Mol Cell Biol 27:7781–7790. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00430-07
Blumwald E (2000) Sodium transport and salt tolerance in plants. Curr Opin Cell Biol 12:431–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-0674(00)00112-5
Chen M, Wang CL, Bao H, Chen H, Wang YW (2016) Genome-wide identification and characterization of novel lncRNAs in Populus under nitrogen deficiency. Mol Genet Genomics 291:1663–1680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-016-1210-3
Cheng Y, Tian QY, Zhang WH (2016) Glutamate receptors are involved in mitigating effects of amino acids on seed germination of Arabidopsis thaliana under salt stress. Environ Exp Bot 130:68–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2016.05.004
Clough SJ, Bent AF (1998) Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 16:735–743. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00343.x
Cutler SR, Rodriguez PL, Finkelstein RR, Abrams SR (2010) Abscisic acid: emergence of a core signaling network. Annu Rev Plant Biol 61:651–679. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112122
Deng F, Zhang X, Wang W, Yuan R, Shen F (2018) Identification of Gossypium hirsutum long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) under salt stress. BMC Plant Biol 18:23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-018-1238-0
Ferrari S, Vairo D, Ausubel FM, Cervone F, De Lorenzo G (2002) Tandemly duplicated Arabidopsis genes that encode polygalacturonase inhibiting proteins are regulated coordinately by different signal transduction pathways in response to fungal infection. Plant Cell 15:93–106. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.005165
Finch-Savage WE, Leubner-Metzger G (2006) Seed dormancy and the control of germination. New Phytol 171:501–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01787.x
Finkelstein R, Gampala SSL, Lynch TJ, Thomas TL, Rock CD (2005) Redundant and distinct functions of the ABA response loci ABA-INSENSITIVE(ABI)5 and ABRE-BINDING FACTOR (ABF)3. Plant Mol Biol 59:253–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-005-8767-2
Fu JH, Chu JF, Sun XH, Wang JD, Yan CY (2012) Simple, rapid, and simultaneous assay of multiple carboxyl containing phytohormones in wounded tomatoes by UPLC-MS/MS using single SPE purification and isotope dilution. Anal Sci 28:1081–1087. https://doi.org/10.2116/analsci.28.1081
Guo JJ, Yang XH, Weston DJ, Chen JG (2011) Abscisic acid receptors: past, present and future. J Integr Plant Biol 53:469–479. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7909.2011.01044.x
Holbrook NM, Shashidhar V, James RA, Rana M (2002) Stomatal control in tomato with ABA-deficient roots: response of grafted plants to soil drying. J Exp Bot 373:1503–1514. https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/53.373.1503
Horie T, Schroeder JI (2004) Sodium transporters in plants. Diverse genes and physiological functions. Plant Physiol 136:2457–2462. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.104.046664
Huanca-Mamani W, Arias-Carrasco R, Cardena-Ninasivincha S, Rojas-Herrera M, Sepulveda-Hermosilla G, Caris-Maldonado JS, Bastias E, Maracaja-Coutinho V (2018) Long non-coding RNAs responsive to salt and boron stress in the hyper-arid Lluteno maize from Atacama Desert. Genes 9(170):170. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes9030170
Huang Y, Feng CZ, Ye Q, Wu WH, Chen YF (2016) Arabidopsis WRKY6 transcription factor acts as a positive regulator of abscisic acid signaling during seed germination and early seedling development. PLoS Genet 12:e1005833. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005833
Ishitani M, Liu JP, Halfter U, Kim CS, Shi WM, Zhu JK (2000) SOS3 function in plant salt tolerance requires N-myristoylation and calcium binding. Plant Cell 12:1667–1678. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.12.9.1667
Jiang ZH, Zhou XP, Tao M et al (2019) Plant cell-surface GIPC sphingolipids sense salt to trigger Ca2+ influx. Nature 572:341–346. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1449-z
Julkowska MM, Testerink C (2015) Tuning plant signaling and growth to survive salt. Trends Plant Sci 20:586–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2015.06.008
Kalunke RM, Tundo S, Benedetti M, Cervone F, De Lorenzo G, D’Ovidio R (2015) An update on polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein (PGIP), a leucine-rich repeat protein that protects crop plants against pathogens. Front Plant Sci 6:146. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00146
Kanai M, Nishimura M, Hayashi M (2010) A peroxisomal ABC transporter promotes seed germination by inducing pectin degradation under the control of ABI5. Plant J 62:936–947. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04205.x
Ketehouli T, Carther KFI, Noman M, Wang FW, Li XW, Li HY (2019) Adaptation of plants to salt stress: characterization of Na+ and K+ transporters and role of CBL gene family in regulating salt stress response. Agronomy 9:687. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9110687
Khandelwal A, Cho SH, Marella H, Sakata Y, Perroud PF, Pan A, Quatrano RS (2010) Role of ABA and ABI3 in desiccation tolerance. Science 327:546–548. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1183672
Kim TH, Böhmer M, Hu H, Nishimura N, Schroeder JI (2010) Guard cell signal transduction network: advances in understanding abscisic acid, CO2, and Ca2+ signaling. Annu Rev Plant Biol 61:561–591. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112226
Koornneef M, Bentsink L, Hilhorst H (2002) Seed dormancy and germination. Curr Opin Plant Biol 5:33–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-5266(01)00219-9
Kornienko AE, Guenzl PM, Barlow DP, Pauler FM (2013) Gene regulation by the act of long non-coding RNA transcription. BMC Biol 11:59. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-11-59
Kumar M, Kesawat MS, Ali A, Lee SC, Gill SS, Kim HU (2019) Integration of abscisic acid signaling with other signaling pathways in plant stress responses and development. Plants 8:592. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8120592
Kushiro T, Okamoto M, Nakabayashi K, Yamagishi K, Kitamura S, Asami T, Hirai N, Koshiba T, Kamiya Y, Nambara E (2004) The Arabidopsis cytochrome P450 CYP707A encodes ABA 8-hydroxylases: key enzymes in ABA catabolism. EMBO J 23:1647–1656. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600121
Laurie S, Feeney KA, Maathuis FJM, Heard PJ, Brown SJ, Leigh RA (2002) A role for HKT1 in sodium uptake by wheat roots. Plant J 32:139–149. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01410.x
Li L, Eichten SR, Shimizu R et al (2014) Genome-wide discovery and characterization of maize long non-coding RNAs. Genome Biol 15:R40. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2014-15-2-r40
Li N, Wang ZY, Wang BK, Wang J, Xu RQ, Yang T, Huang SY, Wang H, Yu QH (2022) Identification and characterization of long non-coding RNA in tomato roots under salt stress. Front Plant Sci 13:834027. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.834027
Liu JP, Ishitani M, Halfter U, Kim CS, Zhu JK (2000) The Arabidopsis thaliana SOS2 gene encodes a protein kinase that is required for salt tolerance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:3730–3734. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.7.3730
Liu J, Wang H, Chua NH (2015) Long noncoding RNA transcriptome of plants. Plant Biotech J 13:319–328
Liu X, Hu PW, Huang MK, Tang Y, Li Y, Li L, Hou XL (2016) The NF-YC–RGL2 module integrates GA and ABA signaling to regulate seed germination in Arabidopsis. Nature Comm 7:12768–12782. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12768
Lopez-Molina L, Mongrand S, McLachlin DT, Chait BT, Chua NH (2002) ABI5 acts downstream of ABI3 to execute an ABA-dependent growth arrest during germination. Plant J 32:317–328. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2002.01430.x
Luo X, Bai X, Sun XL, Zhu D, Liu BH, Ji W, Cai H, Cao L, Wu J, Hu MR, Liu X, Tang LL, Zhu YM (2013) Expression of wild soybean WRKY20 in Arabidopsis enhances drought tolerance and regulates ABA signalling. J Exp Bot 64:2155–2169. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ert073
Mansour MMF, Salama KHA, Al-Mutawa MM (2003) Transport proteins and salt tolerance in plants. Plant Sci 164:891–900. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(03)00109-2
Manz B, Müller K, Kucera B, Volke F, Leubner-Metzger G (2005) Water uptake and distribution in germinating tobacco seeds investigated in vivo by nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. Plant Physiol 138:1538–1551. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.105.061663
Miao C, Xiao L, Hua K, Zou C, Zhao Y, Bressan RA, Zhu JK (2018) Mutations in a subfamily of abscisic acid receptor genes promote rice growth and productivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115:6058–6063. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1804774115
Miyazono KI, Miyakawa T, Sawano Y, Kubota K, Kang HJ, Asano A, Miyauchi Y, Takahashi M, Zhi Y, Fujita Y, Yoshida T, Kodaira KS, Kazuko Yamaguchi-Shinozaki Y, Tanokura M (2009) Structural basis of abscisic acid signalling. Nature 462:609–614. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08583
Munemasa S, Hauser F, Park J, Waadt R, Brandt B, Schroeder JI (2015) Mechanisms of abscisic acid-mediated control of stomatal aperture. Curr Opin Plant Biol 28:154–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2015.10.010
Nakashima K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (2013) ABA signaling in stress-response and seed development. Plant Cell Rep 232:959–970. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-013-1418-1
Nonogaki H, Bassel GW, Bewley JD (2010) Germination-still a mystery. Plant Sci 179:574–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.02.010
Park SY, Fung P, Nishimura N et al (2009) Abscisic acid inhibits type 2C protein phosphatases via the PYR/ PYL family of START proteins. Science 324:1068–1071. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1173041
Ponting CP, Oliver PL, Reik W (2009) Evolution and functions of long noncoding RNAs. Cell 136:629–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.02.006
Qin T, Zhao H, Cui P, Albesher N, Xiong LM (2017) A nucleus-localized long non-coding RNA enhances drought and salt stress tolerance. Plant Physiol 75:1321–1336. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.17.00574
Qiu QS, Guo Y, Dietrich MA, Schumaker KS, Zhu JK (2002) Regulation of SOS1, a plasma membrane Na+/H+ exchanger in Arabidopsis thaliana, by SOS2 and SOS3. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:8436–8441. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.122224699
Rajjou L, Duval M, Gallardo K, Catusse J, Bally J, Job C, Job D (2012) Seed germination and vigor. Annu Rev Plant Biol 63:507–533. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042811-105550
Rathinam M, Rao U, Sreevathsa R (2020) Novel biotechnological strategies to combat biotic stresses: polygalacturonase inhibitor (PGIP) proteins as a promising comprehensive option. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 104:2333–2342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-020-10396-3
Rus A, Yokoi S, Sharkhuu A, Reddy M, Lee BH, Matsumoto TK, Koiwa H, Zhu JK, Bressan RA, Hasegawa PM (2001) AtHKT1 is a salt tolerance determinant that controls Na+ entry into plant roots. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:14150–14155. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.241501798
Sah SK, Reddy KR, Li JX (2016) Abscisic acid and abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Front Plant Sci 7:571. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00571
Shi HZ, Ishitani M, Kim C, Zhu JK (2000) The Arabidopsis thaliana salt tolerance gene SOS1 encodes a putative Na+/H+ antiporter. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:6896–6901. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.120170197
Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (2007) Gene networks involved in drought stress response and tolerance. J Exp Bot 58:221–227. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erl164
Sunarpi HT, Motoda J et al (2005) Enhanced salt tolerance mediated by AtHKT1 transporter-induced Na unloading from xylem vessels to xylem parenchyma cells. Plant J 44:928–938. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02595.x
Verslues PE, Zhu JK (2007) New developments in abscisic acid perception metabolism. Curr Opin Plant Biol 10:447–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2007.08.004
Vishwakarma K, Upadhyay N, Kumar N, Yadav G, Singh J, Mishra RK, Kumar V, Verma R, Upadhyayet RG, Pandeyal M, Sharma S (2017) Abscisic acid signaling and abiotic stress tolerance in plants: a review on current knowledge and future prospects. Front Plant Sci 20:161. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00161
Wang H, Chung PJ, Liu J, Jang IC, Kean MJ, Xu J, Chua NH (2014a) Genome-wide identification of long noncoding natural antisense transcripts and their responses to light in Arabidopsis. Genome Res 24:444–453. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.165555.113
Wang Y, Fan X, Lin F, He G, Terzaghi W, Zhu D, Deng XW (2014b) Arabidopsis noncoding RNA mediates control of photomorphogenesis by red light. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:10359–10364. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1409457111
Wang T, Tohge T, Ivakov A, Mueller-Roeber B, Fernie AR, Mutwil M, Schippers JHM, Persson S (2015a) Salt-related MYB1 coordinates abscisic acid biosynthesis and signaling during salt stress in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 169:1027–1041. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.00962
Wang TZ, Liu M, Zhao MG, Chen RJ, Zhang WH (2015b) Identification and characterization of long non-coding RNAs involved in osmotic and salt stress in Medicago truncatula using genome-wide high-throughput sequencing. BMC Plant Biol 15:131. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-015-0530-5
Wang ZJ, Ren ZY, Cheng CH et al (2020) Counteraction of ABA-mediated inhibition of seed germination and seedling establishment by ABA signaling terminator in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant 13:1284–1297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2020.06.011
Wilkinson S, Davies WJ (2002) ABA-based chemical signalling: the co-ordination of responses to stress in plants. Plant Cell Environ 25:195–210. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00824.x
Wu RN, Wang H, Yang CC, Wang ZY, Wu YJ (2017) Construction of lncRNA At5NC056820 overexpression vector in Arabidopsis thaliana and study on drought resistance of transgenic plants. Acta Bot Boreali-Occidentalia Sin 37:1904–1909
Wu J, Liu CX, Liu ZG, Li S, Li DD, Liu SY, Huang XQ, Liu SK, Yukawa YS (2019) Pol III-dependent cabbage BoNR8 long ncRNA affects seed germination and growth in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol 60:421–435. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcy220
Xu ZY, Kim DH, Hwang I (2013) ABA homeostasis and signaling involving multiple subcellular compartments and multiple receptors. Plant Cell Rep 32:807–813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-013-1396-3
Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K (2006) Transcriptional regulatory networks in cellular responses and tolerance to dehydration and cold stresses. Annu Rev Plant Biol 57:781–803. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105444
Yokoi S, Quintero FJ, Cubero B, Ruiz MT, Bressan RA, Hasegawa PM, Pardo JM (2002) Differential expression and function of Arabidopsis thaliana NHX Na+/H+ antiporters in the salt stress response. Plant J 30:529–539. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01309.x
Yu JN, Huang J, Wang ZN, Zhang JS, Chen SY (2008) A Na+/H+ antiporter gene from wheat plays an important role in stress tolerance. J Biosci 32:1153–1161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12038-007-0117-x
Yuan K, Rashotte AM, Wysocka-Diller JW (2011) ABA and GA signaling pathways interact and regulate seed germination and seedling development under salt stress. Acta Physiol Plant 33:261–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-010-0542-6
Zhang X, Garreton V, Chua NH (2005) The AIP2 E3 ligase acts as a novel negative regulator of ABA signaling by promoting ABI3 degradation. Genes Develop 19:1532–1543. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1318705
Zhang Z, Hu X, Zhang Y, Miao Z, Xie C, Meng X, Deng J, Wen J, Mysore KS, Frugier F, Wang T, Dong J (2016) Opposing control by transcription factors MYB61 and MYB3 increases freezing tolerance by relieving C-Repeat binding factor suppression. Plant Physiol 172:1306–1323. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.16.00051
Zhang XP, Dong J, Deng FN, Wang W, Cheng YY, Song LR, Hu MJ, Shen J, Xu QJ, Shen FF (2019) The long non-coding RNA lncRNA973 is involved in cotton response to salt stress. BMC Plant Biol 19:459. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-019-2088-0
Zhang XP, Shen J, Xu QJ, Dong J, Song LR, Wang W, Shen FF (2021) Long noncoding RNA lncRNA354 functions as a competing endogenous RNA of miR160b to regulate ARF genes in response to salt stress in upland cotton. Plant Cell Environ 44:3302–3321. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.14133
Zhao X, Li J, Lian B, Gu H, Li Y, Qi Y (2018) Global identification of Arabidopsis lncRNAs reveals the regulation of MAF4 by a natural antisense RNA. Nature Commu 9:5056. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07500-7
Zhao MG, Wang TZ, Sun TY, Yu XX, Tian R, Zhang WH (2020) Identification of tissue-specific and cold-responsive lncRNAs in Medicago truncatula by high-throughput RNA sequencing. BMC Plant Biol 20:99. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-020-2301-1
Zhu JK (2001) Plant salt tolerance. Trends Plant Sci 6:66–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1360-1385(00)01838-0
Zhu JK (2002) Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 53:247–273. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.53.091401.143329
Zhu JK (2016) Abiotic stress signaling and responses in plants. Cell 167:313–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.029
Zhu JK, Liu J, Xiong L (1998) Genetic analysis of salt tolerance in Arabidopsis. Evidence for a critical role of potassium nutrition. Plant Cell 10:1181–1191. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.10.7.1181
Zhu QH, Stephen S, Taylor J, Helliwell CA, Wang MB (2013) Long noncoding RNAs responsive to Fusarium oxysporum infection in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol 201:574–584. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12537
Acknowledgements
We thank the technical support from the Test Centre of State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change.
Funding
Science and Technology Program of Inner Mongolia, China (2021ZD004502; 2021GG0372), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31671270).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Communicated by Dorothea Bartels.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Tian, R., Sun, X., Liu, C. et al. A Medicago truncatula lncRNA MtCIR1 negatively regulates response to salt stress. Planta 257, 32 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-022-04064-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-022-04064-1