Abstract
Bisphenol A (BPA), a synthetic additive used to harden polycarbonate plastics and epoxy resin, is ubiquitous in our everyday environment. Many studies have indicated detrimental effects of BPA on the mammalian reproductive abilities. This study is aimed to test the potential effects of BPA on methylation of imprinted genes during oocyte growth and meiotic maturation in CD-1 mice. Our results demonstrated that BPA exposure resulted in hypomethylation of imprinted gene Igf2r and Peg3 during oocyte growth, and enhanced estrogen receptor (ER) expression at the levels of mRNA and protein. The relationship between ER expression and imprinted gene hypomethylation was substantiated using an ER inhibitor, ICI182780. In addition, BPA promoted the primordial to primary follicle transition, thereby speeding up the depletion of the primordial follicle pool, and suppressed the meiotic maturation of oocytes because of abnormal spindle assembling in meiosis I. In conclusion, neonatal exposure to BPA inhibits methylation of imprinted genes during oogenesis via the ER signaling pathway in CD-1 mice.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
In recent years, there has been a growing concern about the effects of bisphenol A (BPA) on human health. BPA is a synthetic additive used to harden polycarbonate plastics and epoxy resin present in many consumer products; furthermore, it can be released from industrial products by various physical or chemical processes and be absorbed through the human skin or inhaled as dust (Brotons et al. 1995; Calafat et al. 2005; Ikezuki et al. 2002; Schonfelder et al. 2002; Vandenberg et al. 2007; Yamamoto et al. 2001). However, exposure to BPA-contaminated food and water is the common route in humans. BPA exposure results in many adverse reproductive effects such as decreased epididymal weight, increased prostate size and androgen receptor binding activity in laboratory rodents (Nagel et al. 1997). Some studies suggest that BPA, as an endocrine disruptor, can cause germ cell malfunction. Prenatal exposure to low doses of BPA (20 μg/kg daily) from embryonic day 0.5 has been shown to perturb neocortical histogenesis and thalamocortical pathway formation (Nakamura et al. 2007; Nakamura et al. 2006). Meiosis is an important process for germ cell development and previous studies have shown prenatal exposure to BPA causes remarkable aberrations in the meiotic prophase, including synaptic defects and increased levels of recombination in the early stage of development, and these aberrations are translated into an increase in aneuploid eggs and embryos (Hunt et al. 2003; Susiarjo et al. 2007).
Genomic imprinting, a specific epigenetic mechanism in mammals, plays a crucial role in the process of germ cell growth, development and function (Song et al. 2009). DNA methylation is an epigenetic regulator of gene expression and it acts as an important molecular marker for parental-specific expression of genes subjected to genomic imprinting (Reik and Walter 2001). In mice, the sex-specific epigenetic modifications are imposed during gametogenesis whereas it act as markers to distinguish the maternal and paternal alleles (Surani 1998). Insulin like growth factor II receptor (Igf2r) and paternally expressed 3 (Peg3) are imprinted postnatally from postnatal days (PND) 5 to 25 in the mouse, which is consistent with oocyte and follicle development. Previous studies suggested that there was a close relation between oocyte growth and the establishment of Igf2r and Peg3’s imprinting (Hiura et al. 2006; Song et al. 2009).
Oocyte growth and maturation are key processes of female gamete development. Many steroids, genes and related proteins are involved in the biological reactions of oogenesis and the maturation process. These factors are easily influenced by exogenous elements (Lutz et al. 2001; Smith and Ecker 1971). Moreover, during the fetal development period, the non-fully developed body, especially the genital system, is susceptible to improper exogenous elements. Whether such influencing factors cause heritable variation to germ cells is currently drawing more attention and many studies have focused on the epigenetic alterations induced by BPA exposure (Bromer et al. 2010; Dolinoy et al. 2007; Ho et al. 2006; Yaoi et al. 2008). We investigated the effects of BPA on DNA methylation on imprinted genes and its potential influence on oocyte development and several associated phenotype alterations. In addition, we preliminarily elucidated the mechanism of BPA action.
Materials and methods
Animals and experimental design
All procedures described in the study were reviewed and approved by the Ethical Committee of Qingdao Agricultural University. 110 CD-1 mice were used in Experiment 1, and 73 mice were used in Experiment 2.
On the basis of previous data from our laboratory, during postnatal days (PND) 7–14, imprinted gene Igf2r and Peg3 were methylated from 52.67 to 81.33% and 33.33 to 76.67% respectively, and nearly fully methylated on PND 21 (Song et al. 2009). To assess the effect of BPA exposure on imprinted gene methylation, in Experiment 1, PND 7 to 14 female mice were given a weight-dependent hypodermical injection [lower than the “safe” dosage according to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)] daily and were killed on PND 15. Mice in Experiment 1 were also used to detect DNA methyltransferase expression, as it was approximate the midpoint of Igf2r and Peg3 gene full methylation. For the purpose of imitating the mode of human exposure to BPA (long-term and low dosage), a lower BPA exposure concentration was used in Experiment 2, in which mice were given a weight-dependent injection in a method similar to that of the mice in Experiment 1 from PND 5 to 20 every 5 days (PND5, PND10, PND15 and PND20 respectively). The mice in Experiment 2 were killed on PND 21, and most of the mouse oocytes were prepared for fertilization. For each experiment, three different treatment groups were treated with three different concentrations of BPA (0, 20 and 40 μg/kg dissolved into physiological saline with 0.1% DMSO).
Sample collection and oocyte diameter measuring
The mouse ovaries were collected from Experiment 1 (PND 15) or Experiment 2 (PND 21) mice, and the oocytes were obtained by digested ovary suspension for genome DNA and total RNA extraction. Briefly, the ovaries were firstly rended into as small as possible with eye forceps in the parenzyme and collagenase mixture (10:1) and then incubated the mixture at 37°C in an incubator for 10 min. At last, 300–500 oocytes per sample were randomly selected using elongated straw under the Olympus stereoscope.
All the oocytes from each group were imaged by an Olympus CKX41 inverted microscope with an Image-Pro® Plus 6.2 system for diameter measuring. The oocyte diameter (after the stage of the primary follicles) was defined as the length of a line that goes through the center of the oocyte sphere from the two sides of the zona pellucid edge. The diameter of oocytes in the primordial follicles was measure without zona pellucida. At least 1,500 oocytes were calculated in each group.
Sodium bisulfite genomic DNA sequencing
DNA was isolated from about 400 oocytes (comes from 10 to 12 ovaries) using a micro DNA isolation kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, the cell lysate containing nucleic acid released from the oocytes was absorbed by pellosil absorption column with a supplied centrifugal force supplied at 12,000 rpm. After several times of column washing, the DNA was dissolved into eluant. The isolated DNA was treated with sodium bisulfite with a Methylamp™ DNA modification kit (Epigentek, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The bisulfite-treated DNA was amplified by PCR for Igf2r (insulin like growth factor 2 receptor), Peg3 (paternal expressed gene 3) and H19 genes with primers (Supplemental Table 1) and the PCR conditions previously described (Li et al. 1993, 1999), and the amplification region was shown in Fig. 1a. The PCR products were separated by electrophoresis in 1% agarose gel, and the correct sized bands were isolated from the gel and purified with Wizard SV Gel and a PCR Clean-Up System (Promega, USA). The purified DNA was cloned into a pMD18-T vector (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The positive clones were obtained by aminobenzylpenicillin selection and the insert was sequenced at GeneScript (Nanjing, China).
RNA extraction and real-time PCR
Total RNA was extracted from about 400 oocytes (from 10 to 12 ovaries) using an RNAprep pure Micro Kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Oocytes were cracked and total RNA was absorbed by special silicone jelly material in the adsorption column. After several times operation of proteins and DNA elution, the RNA was resuspended into 11 μl nuclease-free water. For isolating the total RNA from the mouse ovaries, the ovaries were cracked by use of an RNAiso reagent (Takara, Dalian, China). After the chloroform extraction and isopropanol precipitation, the total ovarian RNA was dissolved in 22 μl RNase-free water. The oocyte and ovarian cDNA was synthesized using a PrimeScript™ RT Reagent Kit (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Reaction conditions: 25 pmol Oligo dT Primer, 50 pmol random primers, and 300 ng RNA, 5×PrimerScript™ Buffer up to a 20 μl final volume. Experiments in this part were carried out to quantify gene expression with SYBR Premix Ex Taq™ kit (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) in an ABI 7300 real-time PCR instrument (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA), and using the standard curve method with β-actin as the reference gene. The primers used to amplify ERα, ERβ, Dnmt1, Dnmt3a, Dnmt3b, Dnmt3l and β-actin have been previously described (Kipp et al. 2007; La Salle et al. 2004; Tanikawa et al. 1998) (Supplemental Table 2). Amplification was performed in 20 μl reaction volume according to the manufacturer’s instructions, containing 10 μl SYBR Premix Ex Taq™, 0.4 μl ROX Reference Dye II, 0.8 μl (0.4 μM) forward primer and reverse primer, 2 μl cDNA and 6 μl ddH2O.
Western blot
The proteins were released from the ovaries (from 6 to 8 different treated mice) with an RIPA lysis solution (Beyotime, Jiangsu, China). Western blotting analysis was performed according to standard methods (Zhang et al. 2010). Briefly, after 10% SDS-PAGE electrophoresis, proteins were transferred onto a polyvinylidene fluoride membrane, blocked with TBST containing 10% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and incubated with specific primary antibodies: anti-actin (Abcam ab8226, Hong Kong) at the concentration of 1.0 μg/ml and anti-ERα (Abcam ab2746) at the concentration of 0.5 μg/ml. After exposure to secondary antibodies (Beyotime), the blots were developed by enhanced chemiluminescence (Beyotime). The band intensity was quantified using actin as an internal quantitative control and IPWIN software was used for intensity measuring.
Ovarian culture in vitro
To investigate the relationship between estrogen receptor expression and imprinted gene DNA hypomethylation, an in vitro culture system was employed (an in vitro study compared to Experiment 1). Briefly, ovaries were separated mechanically from PND 7 mice and cultured in basic medium [α-MEM + DMEM/F12 (1:1) (Hyclone), 1% penicillin–streptomycin, 1% sodium pyruvate, 0.3% BSA (Roche)] for 8 days. All of the ovaries were cultured at 37°C, 5% CO2 and saturated humidity condition. The medium was half-changed every 2 days. At the end of the culture, ovaries were sorted out of the medium and digested with trypsin and collagenase mixture for 10 min. The control group contained basic medium, the BPA group contained basic medium with 4.34 μM BPA (1.25 μg/ml), and the BPA + ICI182780 (ER inhibitor, Santa Cruz, USA) group contained basic medium with 4.34 μM BPA and 0.434 μM (0.26 μg/ml) ICI182780.
Maturation of oocytes in vitro
PND 21 mouse ovaries from the 0 (control), 20 and 40 μg/kg groups were collected. Antral follicle oocytes were released by puncturing the ovaries and washed three times in semi-maturation medium (maturation medium without FSH and EGF) before culturing in maturation medium [α-MEM, 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), 1% penicillin–streptomycin, 1% sodium pyruvate (Hyclone), 100 mIU/ml FSH, 1 ng/ml EGF (Sigma)]. The maturation medium droplets in mineral oil were pre-incubated at 37°C, 5% CO2 and saturated humidity conditions for 12 h before use. The oocytes were cultured in the maturation medium for 16–18 h before the oocytes and their oocyte maturation status was scored. Oocyte maturation status was scored as germinal vesicle (GV) when the germinal vesicle was present, as germinal vesicle breakdown (GVBD) when the germinal vesicle had broken down, and as metaphase II (MII) when the first polar body had been extruded. The percentage of GVBD is the percentage of oocytes that progressed to GVBD in the total number of mature GV stage oocytes, while the percentage of MII is that of progressed polar body extrusion oocytes in the total number of GVBD oocytes.
Spindle assembling analysis
Antral follicle oocytes were released by puncturing PND 21 mouse ovaries and then sorted out using an elongated straw and matured for 16–18 h in vitro. The GVBD and MII stage oocytes were incubated in 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min at room temperature (RT). The zona pellucida (ZP) was then removed with acidic M2 (Millipor MR-015-D, USA, adjust to pH = 2.5 before use) and incubated with α-tublin antibody (Sigma F2168, USA) in cassette for 2 h at RT and stained with propidium iodide (PI) for 15 min. Finally, slices were covered by coverslip supplied with DABCO antifade (Li et al. 2009). The oocytes were examined with a confocal laser-scanning microscope (Zeiss LSM 510 META, Germany).
Statistical methods
For each set of results, independent experiments were repeated at least three times, with data representing the mean ± SD of all repeats within an individual experiment. Data were analyzed by t test or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Tukey test for multiple comparisons to determine statistical differences between groups (denoted by a star or different letters) using GraphPad Prism analysis software. Results were considered significant at p < 0.05.
Results
BPA affects the establishment of imprinted gene methylation
To evaluate the effects of BPA on the reprogramming of imprinted genes during the postnatal development of oocytes, the DNA methylation status of Igf2r, Peg3 and H19 was analyzed (Supplemental Fig. 1; Fig. 1). The results showed that the increased concentration of BPA remarkably decreased the methylation pattern of two maternal imprinted genes in both Experiment 1 and 2. In Experiment 1, mice were given weight-dependent hypodermic injections daily from PND 7 to 14 and were killed on PND 15. The percentages of methylated CpG sites in Igf2r DMRs were 94.33, 66 and 25% in the 0, 20 and 40 μg/kg groups, respectively. The percentages of methylated CpG sites in Peg3 DMRs were 83.33, 67.78 and 12.22% in 0, 20 and 40 μg/kg groups, respectively (Fig. 1a, b). In Experiment 2, mice were given a weight-dependent injection in a method similar to that of Experiment 1 from PND 5 to 20 every 5 days (PND5, PND10, PND15 and PND20 respectively) and were killed on PND 21. The percentages of methylated CpG sites in Igf2r DMRs were 89.67, 79.33 and 39.67% in the 0, 20 and 40 μg/kg groups, respectively. The percentages of methylated CpG sites in Peg3 DMRs were 91.67, 87.78 and 66.11% in the 0, 20 and 40 μg/kg groups, respectively (p < 0.01) (Fig. 1c, d). Under the same BPA concentration exposure (20 μg/kg), the DNA methylation status in the earlier developmental stage of oocytes in Experiment 1 was lower than that of the later ones in Experiment 2, as the establishment of imprinted gene methylation was development dependent. H19, a paternal imprinted gene, was also analyzed to assure the purity of the germ cell genomic DNA. Our results demonstrated that the percentages of methylated CpG sites in H19 DMRs were 1.88, 0 and 4.38% in the 0, 20 and 40 μg/kg groups in Experiment 1, respectively, and 10, 3.13 and 5% in the 0, 20 and 40 μg/kg groups in Experiment 2, respectively. These results showed that BPA affected the methylation establishment of these two maternal imprinted genes.
DNA methylation transferases (Dnmts) is a family of enzymes indispensable during the process of gene methylation modification (Robertson 2001). As the establishment and maintenance of DNA methylation pattern are ongoing during oogenesis, we examined the expression dynamics of Dnmt1, Dnmt3a, Dnmt3b and Dnmt3L during oogenesis under exposure to BPA using quantitative RT-PCR. As shown in Fig. 2, after BPA exposure in Experiment 1, the expressions of four types of Dnmts were all suppressed with the increase of the BPA treatment concentration: Dnmt1 (0.7864 ± 0.0853), Dnmt3a (0.4313 ± 0.1127), Dnmt3b (0.459 ± 0.0414) and Dnmt3l (0.5129 ± 0.0792) in the 20 μg/kg group and Dnmt1 (0.3368 ± 0.0316), Dnmt3a (0.2655 ± 0.0612), Dnmt3b (0.2852 ± 0.057) and Dnmt3l (0.2987 ± 0.037) in the 40 μg/kg group.
BPA promotes the expression of estrogen receptors
The estrogen receptor (ER) is regarded as a ligand-dependent transcription factor and recruits co-activator complexes with histone acetyltransferase or methyltransferase activities to activate downstream target genes (Hall and McDonnell 2005). Here, we tried to elucidate whether BPA, an environmental xenoestrogen, exerts its biological function via ER signaling pathways. In Experiment 1, there was a significant difference in ERα expression between the treatment group (40 μg/kg) and control group (p < 0.05) (Fig. 3a). BPA exposure significantly up-regulated the mRNA expression of ERα approximately 3.85-fold in comparison to the control. The same dosage of BPA exposure increased ERα expression 1.92-fold versus the control group in Experiment 2 (p < 0.05). However, there was no statistical difference between the control and treatment group in the mRNA expression of the ERβ gene. Western blot was used to detect the protein expression of ERα. As shown in Fig. 3b, our results revealed a positive correlation between BPA exposure concentration and ERα protein expression. With the exposure to BPA, the ERα protein was 1.6 ± 0.23 and 1.8 ± 0.19 times overexpressed in the treatment groups of 20 and 40 μg/kg than in the treatment group of 0 μg/kg (control) in Experiment 1, and 1.5 ± 0.11 and 1.6 ± 0.09 times overexpressed in the treatment group of 20 and 40 μg/kg than in the treatment group of 0 μg/kg (control) in Experiment 2.
BPA suppresses imprinted gene methylation by affecting the ER expression
To substantiate whether the ER signal pathway was involved in BPA-induced hypomethylation, an in vitro ovarian culture system was employed (Fig. 4a). As shown in Fig. 4b, c, the methylation process of the imprinted gene and the mRNA expression of Dnmts were recovered with the use of an ER inhibitor, ICI182780. There was a significant difference between the BPA (44.67% methylation in Igf2r DMR2, 0.0854, 0.1593, 0.2711 and 0.4195 for Dnmt1, Dnmt3a, Dnmt3b and Dnmt3l, respectively) and the BPA + ICI182780 (93.33% methylation in Igf2r DMR2, 1.112, 0.9482, 0.9352 and 0.7919 for Dnmt1, Dnmt3a, Dnmt3b and Dnmt3l, respectively) group (p < 0.05), but no statistical difference between the control and the BPA + ICI182780 group.
To get to know the connection between the DNA methylation of ER-α promoter region and ER regulation, DNA methylation in the ER-α promoter region was analyzed and results showed that bisphenol A did not affect the DNA methylation in the ER-α promoter region (data no shown).
BPA speeds up depletion of the primordial follicle pool
To uncover whether BPA exposure influences follicular development, we analyzed the progress of folliculogenesis in ovaries treated with BPA. Compared with the 0 (control) group, the ovaries exposed to BPA had significantly decreased primordial follicles but increased primary, secondary and antral follicles (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01), while there was no statistical difference between the treatment and control groups in the total oocyte number per slice (p > 0.05) (Fig. 5a, b; Supplemental Fig. 2).
Oocyte diameter is one of the most important indicators of oocyte development. Our results demonstrated that the diameters of the oocytes treated with BPA were significantly bigger than those of the control group (p < 0.01) (Fig. 5c–f). In Experiment 1 (15 days), the diameters of oocytes with BPA exposure were 72.88, 74.25 and 75.39 μm in the 0, 20 and 40 μg/kg groups, respectively. In Experiment 2 (21 days), the diameters of oocytes with BPA exposure were 77.15, 79.30 and 81.03 μm in the 0, 20 and 40 μg/kg groups, respectively (Fig. 5e, f).
BPA inhibits oocyte maturation via affecting spindle assembling
To examine whether BPA exposure interfered with oocyte maturation, we analyzed the ratio of GVBD and MII stage of oocytes in Experiment 2 mice by using an in vitro maturation system. Figure 6a, b illustrates that a high concentration of BPA exposure inhibits the oocyte GVBD. Of 587 oocytes, 398 (67.80%) progressed into GVBD in the BPA exposure group (40 μg/kg), which was significantly lower than the control (536/666, 80.48%) and the 20 μg/kg group (612/748, 81.82%). However, there was no difference in the MII stage.
To investigate the developmental quality of oocytes under BPA exposure, the spindle assembling of oocytes in Experiment 2 mice were analyzed to detect whether oocyte maturation failure induced by BPA exposure was due to abnormality of spindle assembling (Fig. 6c). The ratio of oocytes with abnormal spindle assembling in MI or MII was calculated. As indicated in Fig. 6d, the ratio in MI were 6.5% (8/123), 22.14% (31/140) and 21.23% (38/179) in the 0, 20 and 40 μg/kg groups, respectively, whereas the abnormal ratio in MII were 15.46% (15/97), 18.18% (16/88) and 23.68% (27/114) in the 0, 20 and 40 μg/kg groups, respectively. Together, our results demonstrated that BPA exposure significantly raised the abnormal ratio of spindle assembling in meiosis I (p < 0.05), and that there was no statistical difference between the control and treatment groups in meiosis II (Fig. 6d).
Discussion
In recent years, studies have revealed that BPA could function as an endocrine disruptor, meiotic resumption inhibitor and cell cycle alteration factor (Can et al. 2005; Eichenlaub-Ritter et al. 2008; George et al. 2008; Hunt et al. 2003; Maffini et al. 2006; Pfeiffer et al. 1997; Uzumcu and Zachow 2007) and that it was involved in different biological activities during the development of mammal histogenesis. The aim of this study was to assess the extent of BPA-induced alteration of the imprinted gene methylation during oogenesis and folliculogenesis, and oocyte meiotic maturation. Our results demonstrated that BPA exposure resulted in hypomethylation of imprinted gene Igf2r and Peg3 during oocyte growth and enhanced estrogen receptor (ER) expression. In addition, BPA promoted primordial follicular development and suppressed the meiotic maturation of oocytes because of abnormal spindle assembling in meiosis I.
With the establishment of maternal imprinted genes, such as Igf2R, Peg3 and Snrpn, the oocyte develops until fertilizing ability is accessed. Previous research demonstrated that Igf2r and Peg3 were nearly fully methylated at PND 21 (95.33% for Igf2r and 88.98% for Peg3) (Song et al. 2009). Our data indicated that BPA exposure markedly reduced these indexes (Fig. 1), suggesting a confirmed effect of BPA on the DNA methylation processing of these maternal imprinted genes. Consistently, Dolinoy et al. (2007) also demonstrated that BPA exposure induced the methylation modification alteration of an intracisternal A particle retrotransposon upstream of the Agouti gene and CDK5 activator-binding protein (CabpIAP), which provides a clue that BPA may affect oocyte maturation via direct or indirect epigenetic modification of related genes. In addition, we detected the expression of DNA methylation transferase, which has an intimate relationship with gene methylation modification and found a suppressive effect of BPA on the expression of Dnmts (Fig. 2). In view of the different roles played by thw four types of employed Dnmts (Dnmt1, Dnmt3a, Dnmt3b and Dnmt3l) in the process of gene methylation, they induced gene methylation maintenance (Dnmt1), de-novo (Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b) and the establishment of maternal methylation imprints in the female germ line (Dnmt3l) (Bourc’his et al. 2001; Hata et al. 2002; Lees-Murdock et al. 2005; Okano et al. 1999; Shovlin et al. 2007). We tested the mRNA expression of these four types of Dnmts and found that their expression was inhibited under exposure to BPA, indicating that BPA has vast effects on the process of gene methylation in oocytes, but the study by Bromer et al. (2010) showed that the hypomethylation of Hoxa10 induced by BPA was not due to persistent repression of DNA methyltransferases in utero; therefore, BPA-induced Dnmts low expression may be tissue-specific. In addition, researchers found that other endocrine disrupting chemicals such as methoxychlor (an estrogenic compound) and vinclozolin (an antiandrogenic compound) also altered DNA methylation patterns in the germ line and induced some reproductive defects in the subsequent generations (Anway et al. 2005; Stouder and Paoloni-Giacobino 2010).
As BPA is an estrogen-like chemical, the estrogen receptor must be the most probable target of BPA. Krishnan et al. (1993) substantiated that BPA exerted its biological activities via estrogen receptors. Several previous studies also showed that BPA had weak estrogenic activity (Roy et al. 1997). In addition, Bouskine et al. reported that after binding to a membrane receptor G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), BPA transfers the extracellular signal by the PKA and PKG pathway to induce a remarkable proliferation of JKT-1 cells (Bouskine et al. 2009). In the present study, we found an increased expression of estrogen receptors in mouse ovaries treated with BPA. The mammalian development after birth is accompanied by a continuous increase in estrogen, and the reproductive system is intensively influenced by estrogen. Our data suggest that BPA promotes oocyte growth and follicular development, which results in the acceleration of the transformation of the primordial to primary follicle. As it mimics estrogen, we speculate that BPA may play a role in the process of mammalian reproductive activities to some extent. ER overexpression and DNA methylation modification of maternal imprinted genes regulate the related gene expression, but little is known about whether the ER exerts its action via regulating DNA methylation. In this study, BPA-induced imprinted gene hypomethylation was eliminated by ER inhibitor ICI182780 (Fig. 4), suggesting that ER was the mediator in the process of BPA-induced hypomethylation. In conclusion, BPA induced imprinted genes hypomethylation via the ER signaling pathway during the imprint establishment.
The meiotic process of oocytes is arrested in the diplotene stage of the meiosis I prophase around the time of birth until proper stimulation is given. Therefore, meiotic resumption is a key point of female gamete development (Roy et al. 1997). Spindle assembling is one of the momentous subcellular structure activities during oocyte meiotic resumption. Previous studies suggest that BPA induces cell cycle delay and spindle microtubular organization failure during oocyte meiosis (Can et al. 2005). In the present study, we also observed a remarkable increase in spindle assembling abnormality in meiosis I. The conversion of germinal vesicle breakdown (GVBD) to the first polar body extrusion is a successive course in the process of oocyte meiotic resumption; thus, GVBD is termed the key process of oocyte maturation. Here, our results show that BPA inhibits GVBD, presenting adverse effects on oocyte postnatal development, especially oocyte maturation.
References
Anway MD, Cupp AS, Uzumcu M, Skinner MK (2005) Epigenetic transgenerational actions of endocrine disruptors and male fertility. Science 308:1466–1469
Bourc’his D, Xu GL, Lin CS, Bollman B, Bestor TH (2001) Dnmt3L and the establishment of maternal genomic imprints. Science 294:2536–2539
Bouskine A, Nebout M, Brucker-Davis F, Benahmed M, Fenichel P (2009) Low doses of bisphenol A promote human seminoma cell proliferation by activating PKA and PKG via a membrane G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor. Environ Health Perspect 117:1053–1058
Bromer JG, Zhou Y, Taylor MB, Doherty L, Taylor HS (2010) Bisphenol-A exposure in utero leads to epigenetic alterations in the developmental programming of uterine estrogen response. FASEB J 24:2273–2280
Brotons JA, Olea-Serrano MF, Villalobos M, Pedraza V, Olea N (1995) Xenoestrogens released from lacquer coatings in food cans. Environ Health Perspect 103:608–612
Calafat AM, Kuklenyik Z, Reidy JA, Caudill SP, Ekong J, Needham LL (2005) Urinary concentrations of bisphenol A and 4-nonylphenol in a human reference population. Environ Health Perspect 113:391–395
Can A, Semiz O, Cinar O (2005) Bisphenol-A induces cell cycle delay and alters centrosome and spindle microtubular organization in oocytes during meiosis. Mol Hum Reprod 11:389–396
Dolinoy DC, Huang D, Jirtle RL (2007) Maternal nutrient supplementation counteracts bisphenol A-induced DNA hypomethylation in early development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:13056–13061
Eichenlaub-Ritter U, Vogt E, Cukurcam S, Sun F, Pacchierotti F, Parry J (2008) Exposure of mouse oocytes to bisphenol A causes meiotic arrest but not aneuploidy. Mutat Res 651:82–92
George O, Bryant BK, Chinnasamy R, Corona C, Arterburn JB, Shuster CB (2008) Bisphenol A directly targets tubulin to disrupt spindle organization in embryonic and somatic cells. ACS Chem Biol 3:167–179
Hall JM, McDonnell DP (2005) Coregulators in nuclear estrogen receptor action: from concept to therapeutic targeting. Mol Interv 5:343–357
Hata K, Okano M, Lei H, Li E (2002) Dnmt3L cooperates with the Dnmt3 family of de novo DNA methyltransferases to establish maternal imprints in mice. Development 129:1983–1993
Hiura H, Obata Y, Komiyama J, Shirai M, Kono T (2006) Oocyte growth-dependent progression of maternal imprinting in mice. Genes Cells 11:353–361
Ho SM, Tang WY, Belmonte de Frausto J, Prins GS (2006) Developmental exposure to estradiol and bisphenol A increases susceptibility to prostate carcinogenesis and epigenetically regulates phosphodiesterase type 4 variant 4. Cancer Res 66:5624–5632
Hunt PA, Koehler KE, Susiarjo M, Hodges CA, Ilagan A, Voigt RC, Thomas S, Thomas BF, Hassold TJ (2003) Bisphenol A exposure causes meiotic aneuploidy in the female mouse. Curr Biol 13:546–553
Ikezuki Y, Tsutsumi O, Takai Y, Kamei Y, Taketani Y (2002) Determination of bisphenol A concentrations in human biological fluids reveals significant early prenatal exposure. Hum Reprod 17:2839–2841
Kipp JL, Kilen SM, Woodruff TK, Mayo KE (2007) Activin regulates estrogen receptor gene expression in the mouse ovary. J Biol Chem 282:36755–36765
Krishnan AV, Stathis P, Permuth SF, Tokes L, Feldman D (1993) Bisphenol-A: an estrogenic substance is released from polycarbonate flasks during autoclaving. Endocrinology 132:2279–2286
La Salle S, Mertineit C, Taketo T, Moens PB, Bestor TH, Trasler JM (2004) Windows for sex-specific methylation marked by DNA methyltransferase expression profiles in mouse germ cells. Dev Biol 268:403–415
Lees-Murdock DJ, Shovlin TC, Gardiner T, De Felici M, Walsh CP (2005) DNA methyltransferase expression in the mouse germ line during periods of de novo methylation. Dev Dyn 232:992–1002
Li E, Beard C, Jaenisch R (1993) Role for DNA methylation in genomic imprinting. Nature 366:362–365
Li L, Keverne EB, Aparicio SA, Ishino F, Barton SC, Surani MA (1999) Regulation of maternal behavior and offspring growth by paternally expressed Peg3. Science 284:330–333
Li M, Li S, Yuan J, Wang ZB, Sun SC, Schatten H, Sun QY (2009) Bub3 is a spindle assembly checkpoint protein regulating chromosome segregation during mouse oocyte meiosis. PLoS ONE 4:e7701
Lutz LB, Cole LM, Gupta MK, Kwist KW, Auchus RJ, Hammes SR (2001) Evidence that androgens are the primary steroids produced by Xenopus laevis ovaries and may signal through the classical androgen receptor to promote oocyte maturation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:13728–13733
Maffini MV, Rubin BS, Sonnenschein C, Soto AM (2006) Endocrine disruptors and reproductive health: the case of bisphenol-A. Mol Cell Endocrinol 254–255:179–186
Nagel SC, vom Saal FS, Thayer KA, Dhar MG, Boechler M, Welshons WV (1997) Relative binding affinity-serum modified access (RBA-SMA) assay predicts the relative in vivo bioactivity of the xenoestrogens bisphenol A and octylphenol. Environ Health Perspect 105:70–76
Nakamura K, Itoh K, Yaoi T, Fujiwara Y, Sugimoto T, Fushiki S (2006) Murine neocortical histogenesis is perturbed by prenatal exposure to low doses of Bisphenol A. J Neurosci Res 84:1197–1205
Nakamura K, Itoh K, Sugimoto T, Fushiki S (2007) Prenatal exposure to bisphenol A affects adult murine neocortical structure. Neurosci Lett 420:100–105
Okano M, Bell DW, Haber DA, Li E (1999) DNA methyltransferases Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b are essential for de novo methylation and mammalian development. Cell 99:247–257
Pfeiffer E, Rosenberg B, Deuschel S, Metzler M (1997) Interference with microtubules and induction of micronuclei in vitro by various bisphenols. Mutat Res 390:21–31
Reik W, Walter J (2001) Genomic imprinting: parental influence on the genome. Nat Rev Genet 2:21–32
Robertson KD (2001) DNA methylation, methyltransferases, and cancer. Oncogene 20:3139–3155
Roy D, Palangat M, Chen CW, Thomas RD, Colerangle J, Atkinson A, Yan ZJ (1997) Biochemical and molecular changes at the cellular level in response to exposure to environmental estrogen-like chemicals. J Toxicol Environ Health 50:1–29
Schonfelder G, Wittfoht W, Hopp H, Talsness CE, Paul M, Chahoud I (2002) Parent bisphenol A accumulation in the human maternal–fetal–placental unit. Environ Health Perspect 110:A703–A707
Shovlin TC, Bourc’his D, La Salle S, O’Doherty A, Trasler JM, Bestor TH, Walsh CP (2007) Sex-specific promoters regulate Dnmt3L expression in mouse germ cells. Hum Reprod 22:457–467
Smith LD, Ecker RE (1971) The interaction of steroids with Rana pipiens oocytes in the induction of maturation. Dev Biol 25:232–247
Song Z, Min L, Pan Q, Shi Q, Shen W (2009) Maternal imprinting during mouse oocyte growth in vivo and in vitro. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 387:800–805
Stouder C, Paoloni-Giacobino A (2010) Transgenerational effects of the endocrine disruptor vinclozolin on the methylation pattern of imprinted genes in the mouse sperm. Reproduction 139:373–379
Surani MA (1998) Imprinting and the initiation of gene silencing in the germ line. Cell 93:309–312
Susiarjo M, Hassold TJ, Freeman E, Hunt PA (2007) Bisphenol A exposure in utero disrupts early oogenesis in the mouse. PLoS Genet 3:e5
Tanikawa M, Harada T, Mitsunari M, Onohara Y, Iwabe T, Terakawa N (1998) Expression of c-kit messenger ribonucleic acid in human oocyte and presence of soluble c-kit in follicular fluid. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:1239–1242
Uzumcu M, Zachow R (2007) Developmental exposure to environmental endocrine disruptors: consequences within the ovary and on female reproductive function. Reprod Toxicol 23:337–352
Vandenberg LN, Hauser R, Marcus M, Olea N, Welshons WV (2007) Human exposure to bisphenol A (BPA). Reprod Toxicol 24:139–177
Yamamoto T, Yasuhara A, Shiraishi H, Nakasugi O (2001) Bisphenol A in hazardous waste landfill leachates. Chemosphere 42:415–418
Yaoi T, Itoh K, Nakamura K, Ogi H, Fujiwara Y, Fushiki S (2008) Genome-wide analysis of epigenomic alterations in fetal mouse forebrain after exposure to low doses of bisphenol A. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 376:563–567
Zhang P, Chao H, Sun X, Li L, Shi Q, Shen W (2010) Murine folliculogenesis in vitro is stage-specifically regulated by insulin via the Akt signaling pathway. Histochem Cell Biol 134:75–82
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by grants from the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program, 2012CB944401, 2011CB944501 and 2007CB947401), National Nature Science Foundation (31001010, 31171376 and 31101716), Foundation of Shandong Provincial Education Department (J11LC20), Foundation of Distinguished Young Scholars (JQ201109) and Foundation of Taishan Scholar of Shandong Province.
Conflict of interest
These authors fully declare any financial or other potential conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Materials and methods
The ovaries collected from Experiment 1 and Experiment 2 mice were fixed in 10% neutral formalin. Whole ovary slices were immunostained as previously described (Zhang et al., 2010). Immunohistochemistry was performed on the paraffin section of ovaries of PND 15 and PND 21 using an antibody against STAT3 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-482, La Jolla, CA, USA) at a dilution of 1:200, and the nucleus was stained with hematoxylin. Slices were imaged under a Nikon inversion microscope. Different stages of follicles were counted. Oocytes with single-layer flat somatic cells were regarded as primordial follicles; oocytes with single-layer cubical somatic cells were regarded as primary follicles; and oocytes with multi-layer somatic cells were regarded as secondary follicles. The secondary follicles with follicular cavity were regarded as antral follicles, and the single follicle with multiple oocytes were regarded as multiple oocyte follicle (MOF).
DNA was isolated from ovarian granulose cells of 15 d or 21 d mice using a micro-DNA isolation kit (Tiangen). The isolated DNA was treated with sodium bisulfite with a MethylampTM DNA modification kit (Epigentek). The bisulfite-treated DNA was amplified by PCR for ER-α with primers: left, 5’-AAG ATG TT ATG GAG AGG GTT TTG-3’; right, 5’-AAA CCC CCA AAC TAT TAA CAC TAA AA-3’. The PCR products were separated by electrophoresis in 1% agarose gel, and the correct sized bands were isolated from the gel and purified with Wizard SV Gel and a PCR Clean-Up System (Promega). The purified DNA was cloned into a pMD18-T vector (TaKaRa). The positive clones were obtained by aminobenzylpenicillin selection and the insert was sequenced at GeneScript (Nanjing).
418_2011_894_MOESM2_ESM.ppt
Supplemental Figure 2. The immunohistochemistry analysis of the ovaries from BPA-treated mice (oocyte cytoplasm was labeled by a STAT3 antibody, and nuclei were stained by hematoxylin). Scale bar, 100 μm (PPT 612 kb)
418_2011_894_MOESM3_ESM.ppt
Supplemental Figure 3. BPA did not affect the DNA methylation of estrogen receptor gene promoter region. Circles: CpG sites within the regions analyzed; filled circles: methylated cytosines; open circles: unmethylated cytosines (PPT 200 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chao, HH., Zhang, XF., Chen, B. et al. Bisphenol A exposure modifies methylation of imprinted genes in mouse oocytes via the estrogen receptor signaling pathway. Histochem Cell Biol 137, 249–259 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00418-011-0894-z
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00418-011-0894-z