Introduction

The pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease (PD) is influenced by genetic and/or environmental factors. Iron is increased in the substantia nigra (SN) in PD and is stored as ferritin or neuromelanin in neurons and glia [1, 2]. Release of iron could facilitate oxidative reactions, thereby leading to oxidative stress and subsequent neurodegeneration [3, 4]. It remains to be determined if iron deposition is affected by heavy metal environmental exposure, varying dietary metal intake, polymorphisms, or mutations in metal regulatory proteins or PD causative genes, or if it is a result of the disease process and not necessarily causative [5]. Also, recent post-mortem work has demonstrated increased expression of a divalent metal transporter (DMT1/Nramp2/Slc11a2) isoform in the SN of PD brains, which suggests that this may enhance iron’s entry into nigral neurons and hasten or facilitate PD pathogenesis [6].

Meanwhile, several research groups, including our own, have utilized iron sensitive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) methods to separate individuals with PD from healthy controls [79]. Some techniques have also shown a relationship with the SN and lateralized motor scores but only with the more severely affected contralateral side [10, 11]. In a different study, Gorell et al. [9] presented a correlation of asymmetry of simple reaction time with asymmetries of SN iron-related contrasts generated with R *2 and R2′.

The present study was designed to: (1) replicate that neuronal-sensitive and iron-sensitive measures, T and T, respectively, can separate PD from controls in a cross-sectional study; (2) determine if there is a correlation between clinical measures of PD and MRI relaxation times; and (3) evaluate if MRI methods could provide correlations with clinical asymmetry.

Methods

Patient and control subjects were recruited from the University of Minnesota Movement Disorders Clinic or through posted advertisements. Interested and eligible participants provided informed consent in this University of Minnesota Institutional Review Board-approved study. In addition to age- and gender-matched controls, subjects with a diagnosis of PD [12] who were taking and responding to antiparkinsonian medication were enrolled. All PD subjects were rated in their “on” motor state by the same neurologist (PT) using the complete Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), including the Hoehn and Yahr (H & Y) rating scale [13]. Individuals with dementia (as ascertained clinically and with a Mini-Mental State Examination score <24) and those unable to undergo a brain MRI were excluded from this study [14].

All scans were performed on an MRI system using a Varian Unity INOVA console (Varian Associates, CA) interfaced to a 90-cm bore 4T magnet (Oxford Magnet Technology, Oxford, UK). Transverse multislice images were obtained with a Rapid Acquisition with Relaxation Enhancement (RARE) sequence [repetition time (TR) = 4 s, echo train length = 8, echo spacing = 15 ms, echo time = 60 ms, seven slices, two averages]. Slices were positioned perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the brainstem. The image of midbrain including the center of the red nucleus (RN) and mammillary body was selected for the SN analysis [8]. T and T measurements were performed as described in prior work [15]. For T and T, TurboFLASH imaging readout (four segments) was used [16]. T and T were assessed using 0.70 mm2 in-plane resolution, FOV = 20 cm2, 2562 matrix, and slice thickness = 3 mm. Thus, the digital pixel area is 0.49 mm2, and voxel volume is 1.5 μL. T and T measurements were performed using variable numbers (m) of hyperbolic secant adiabatic full passage (AFP) HS1 pulses using pulse time duration 0.006 s and calibrated to the peak power ω max1  = 1.3 kHz [17].

For T measurements, the AFP pulse train was placed after coherence excitation by an adiabatic half passage (AHP) pulse. Magnetization was returned back to the Z′ axis using AHP pulse, and the TurboFLASH imaging readout was used. For T measurements, the AFP pulse train was placed prior to the coherence excitation by an AHP pulse.

Relaxation T and T maps were generated from pixel-by-pixel analysis using MATLAB software package (MATLAB 7.0, Mathworks, Natick, MA, USA). Region-of-interest (ROI) analyses were performed by one of the authors in a blinded manner. The process of segmenting acquired images of the SN into the pars reticularis (SNr) and pars compacta (SNc) is demanding as there is often interdigitation of tissue [10, 18]. From our images, a low signal intensity area which merges anteriorly into the cerebral peduncle corresponds to SNr and a relatively brighter crescent-shaped region located between SNr and RN may be SNc. In this study, we placed a ROI centrally in the hyperintense area of the region that we designate the SNc (Fig. 1). It was first placed in the RARE image and then copied to matching T and T maps. Statistical analyses were performed on the mean values of the relaxation time constants obtained from the ROIs. For each PD patient the degree of asymmetry of motor dysfunction [19] was determined according to the following formula:

$$ {\frac{\text{UPDRS\,right - UPDRS\,left}}{\text{UPDRS\,right + UPDRS\,left}}}x^{2} $$
Fig. 1
figure 1

RARE image showing boundaries of a representative example of the SNc in the midbrain. A region of interest (ROI) was placed centrally within the bright region that we designate the SNc

UPDRS right and UPDRS left correspond to the sum of each side’s UPDRS part III (motor UPDRS) ratings for rigidity, tremor, and bradykinesia (i.e., finger taps, hand grips, hand pronate/supinate, leg agility). The more negative scores imply more severe left-sided motor findings, and more positive scores correspond to more severe right-sided motor findings. Values of 0 represent symmetric motor impairment. The identical equation was used for calculation of T and T relaxation time constant asymmetries, respectively. A correlation between clinical and MRI asymmetry scores were calculated regarding a relation between the given SN and motor symptoms on the contralateral body side.

Statistical comparisons were based on results of the two-sided Student t test. In addition, a discriminatory ability of T and T was investigated using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves. As a measure of correlations between clinical and MRI findings, the Pearson product–moment correlation coefficient (r) was used. Only p values less than 0.05 were considered to indicate a significant difference.

Results

Nine patients with moderate PD and disease duration greater than 5 years [4 females (F) and 5 males (M)]; 59.0 ± 7.1 years [mean age ± standard deviation (SD)] and ten age- and gender-matched healthy volunteers [5 F and 5 M; 59.3 ± 5.5 years (mean age ± SD)] were included in this prospective study. The mean “ON state” UPDRS motor score was 31 ± 13 (mean age ± SD), and the mean “on” state H&Y score was 2.5. Duration of PD after diagnosis was 7.67 ± 1.9 years (mean ± SD). In Fig. 2, T versus T relaxation time constants of SNc are plotted which shows a clear separation between the PD and control groups. ROC curves revealed good-to-excellent ability to differentiate between PD patients and healthy controls. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for T is 0.989 (0.016), and for T the AUC is 0.956 (0.048). Both (T, T) together in a linear discriminant rule yields perfect classification for AUC = 1.0. Picking optimal cutoffs, the sensitivity of T was 1.00 with 95% (likelihood ratio) CI (0.81–1.00) and specificity 0.90 with 95% CI (0.63–0.99). The sensitivity of T was 0.89 (0.59–0.99) and specificity 1.00 (0.83–1.00). If both (T, T) are used together, the sensitivity and specificity reached 1.00 with 95% CI (0.81–1.00) for sensitivity and (0.83–1.00) for specificity. Figure 3 demonstrates a correlation between T-derived imaging asymmetry of the SNc and UPDRS III-based clinical asymmetry. No asymmetry was detected with T. Significant differences for both T and T relaxation time constants between PD and control subjects are shown in Table 1. In the PD group, there were no significant correlations between the H&Y stage, duration of the disease, UPDRS scores (total score or its subscores), and either contralateral T or T contrasts.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Mean T versus T relaxation time constants of PD and control groups

Fig. 3
figure 3

Correlation between SNc T relaxation time constant asymmetry coefficient and motor UPDRS asymmetry coefficient (r = 0.74, P = 0.02)

Table 1 T and T relaxation time constants in PD and control subjects

Discussion

This study showed that T and T of the “SNc” can distinguish patients with moderate PD from healthy age- and gender-matched controls, which further validates these MRI methods [8]. Compared to standard MRI techniques, utilization of adiabatic pulses at high magnetic fields enhances sensitivity of MRI to molecular motion in the local susceptibility gradients that arises from non-heme iron and tissue water–protein interactions. These methods have been shown to provide enhanced sensitivity to molecular dynamic processes over conventional T1 and T2 MRI methods as demonstrated in our prior work [8]. T provides information about diffusion and exchange of water protons in environments with different local susceptibilities, and as a result, the shortening of T is an indicator of iron content in tissue [8, 20]. Our results are in agreement with evidence of increased iron in the SN in PD [10, 11, 21]. Meanwhile, T contrast is considered to reflect differences in cell density by its specificity to water spin dynamics such as chemical exchange of protons between water associated with macromolecules and free water [8, 2224]. The linkage of T and cell integrity is assumed from animal and human MRI studies [8, 23, 24]. Marked T increase in SNc as compared to controls was revealed in Pitx3-aphakia mice [23, 25]. In Pitx3 deficient mice SNc neurons vanish during development, which models loss of nigrostriatal neurons but not the gliosis in PD [23]. Human in vivo T-weighted MRI studies have shown changes in the hippocampus of Alzheimer’s patients [24] and in the SN of PD patients [8]. Both studies showed increased T in the diseased structures in patients, which suggests this measure is reflective of cellular density. Likewise, in this study we found increased T in the SN of PD versus controls. Although we evaluated a different cohort of PD subjects with longer duration of disease, we did not find a significant correlation between T or T and duration of disease, UPDRS scores, or stage of disease. This finding is congruent with previously published cross-sectional MRI studies looking at iron in the SN [911] and with studies using transcranial sonography (TCS) of the SN [26]. As all PD subjects were scanned on medication, one cannot appreciate if there were medication effects on imaging findings, or if there would have been imaging correlates to “off” UPDRS scores. Presently it remains to be determined if these methods provide a measure of disease severity or a means for tracking progression.

Another aspect that this study focused on is the asymmetric nature of disease. With nuclear tracer imaging, the ability to demonstrate laterality of disease is well established [2729]. In the present study we demonstrated a correlation with T but not T measures of the SN with an asymmetry ratio calculated from UPDRS motor scores. Moreover and similar to the Gorel et al. paper, no relationship was found between means of lateralized motor scores and both T or T measures of respective SNcs [9]. This finding might be due to the age range and severity of subjects evaluated in this study, which was different from Martin et al. where they evaluated untreated patients and from the Wallis et al. study where they included patients with a greater range of disease duration and all H&Y stages [10, 11].

In conclusion, we have demonstrated the ability of MRI methods to separate PD from controls. T may be a useful marker of asymmetry in mild-moderate PD.