Abstract
The heterochromatin of chromosomes 2 and 3 of Drosophila melanogaster contains about 30 essential genes defined by genetic analysis. In the last decade only a few of these genes have been molecularly characterized and found to correspond to protein-coding genes involved in important cellular functions. Moreover, several predicted genes have been identified by annotation of genomic sequence that are associated with polytene chromosome divisions 40, 41 and 80 but their locations on the cytogenetic map of the heterochromatin are still uncertain. To expand our current knowledge of the genetic functions located in heterochromatin, we have performed fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) mapping to mitotic chromosomes of nine bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs) carrying several predicted genes and of 13 P element insertions assigned to the proximal regions of 2R and 3L. We found that 22 predicted genes map to the h46 region of 2R and eight map to the h47 regions of 3L. This amounts to at least 30 predicted genes located in these heterochromatic regions, whereas previous studies detected only seven vital genes. Finally, another 58 genes localize either in the euchromatin-heterochromatin transition regions or in the proximal euchromatin of 2R and 3L.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Constitutive heterochromatin is a ubiquitous component of eukaryotic genomes and exhibits similar unusual properties in animals and plants (John 1988). These properties include: (i) compact state throughout most of the cell cycle; (ii) late replication during S-phase; (iii) pericentromeric and/or peritelomeric location; (iv) low gene density; (v) low genetic recombination; (vi) enrichment in repetitive sequences.
Heterochromatin has been traditionally regarded as a genomic "wasteland", but several studies indicate that in Drosophila melanogaster this peculiar genomic component performs various important biological functions such as gene regulation, centromere and telomere function and meiotic chromosome transmission (reviewed by Gatti and Pimpinelli 1992; Wheiler and Wakimoto 1995; Zuckerkandl and Hennig 1995; Dimitri 1997; McKee 1998; Eissenberg and Hilliker 2000; Sullivan et al. 2001). In addition, detailed genetic analyses have defined about 30 essential genes required for viability that map to the heterochromatin of chromosomes 2 and 3 (Hilliker 1976; Marchant and Holm 1988; Dimitri 1991; Koryakov et al. 2002; Tulin et al. 2002). They are not uniformly distributed throughout the heterochromatin of mitotic cells (Dimitri 1991; Koryakov et al. 2002; see map in Fig. 1), most of them being located in 4′,6-diamino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)-dull fluorescent regions. For example, on chromosome 2, l(2)41Aa and rolled map to region h41; l(2)41Ad is located in h43–h44; and eight loci on the left arm [i.e., l(2)40Fa , l(2)40Fc , concertina , light , l(2)40Fd , l(2)40Fe , l(2)40Ff and l(2)40Fg] and four on the right arm [i.e., l(2)41Ae l(2)41Af , l(2)41Ah and Nipped-B] are grouped within h35 and h46, respectively. The h35 and h46 regions are the most distal portions of mitotic heterochromatin of chromosome 2, encompassing roughly 2 Mb and 1.5 Mb of DNA, respectively. In addition to genes, these regions harbor various clusters of transposable elements (TEs) and are devoid of satellite DNAs (Carmena and Gonzales 1995; Pimpinelli et al. 1995; Dimitri 1997). The early prediction that essential genes located in heterochromatin correspond to unique sequences (Hilliker 1976) has been confirmed by molecular analyses. At least light, concertina , rolled and Nipped-B, in chromosome 2, and l(3)80Fh, l(3)80Fi , l(3)80Fj and Parp, in chromosome 3, are single-copy genes (Devlin et al. 1990; Parks and Weischaus 1991; Biggs et al. 1994; Rollins et al. 1999; Schulze et al. 2001; Tulin et al. 2002). A peculiar feature of these genes is that they exhibit a high density of TE-related sequences within their intronic and flanking regions (Devlin et al. 1990; Tulin et al. 2002; Dimitri et al. 2003).
The heterochromatic genes of chromosomes 2 and 3 are involved in important cellular processes (Table 1). For example, on chromosome 2, light controls vacuole organization and biogenesis (Warner et al. 1998), concertina encodes a maternal α-like subunit of a G protein essential for gastrulation (Parks and Weischaus 1991), the rolled product is a mitogen-activated protein kinase required in the sevenless signal transduction pathway (Biggs et al. 1994), which may have a role in mediating the spindle integrity checkpoint (Inoue and Glover 1998), while the Nipped-B -encoded protein is homologous to a family of adherins that may play a role in chromosome structure (Rollins et al. 1999). Among the proximal heterochromatic genes of chromosome 2 that have not been cloned yet, l(2)41Aa has been suggested to be required for proper chromosome condensation (Cenci et al. 2003) and l(2)41Ad may be involved in leg and wing morphogenesis (Dimitri et al. 2003).
The annotation of the D. melanogaster genome sequence has predicted several protein-coding genes associated with the proximal division 20, 40, 41 and 80 of polytene chromosomes (Adams et al. 2000; Hoskins et al. 2002; Misra et al. 2002; GadFly 2003 http://www.fruitfly.org/cgi-bin/annot/query). Thus far, these gene annotations have been incorporated into FlyBase with inferred locations on the cytogenetic map of the salivary gland polytene chromosome (http://www.fruitfly.org/sequence/faq.html#seq-14) and their mapping in the mitotic heterochromatin remains uncertain. These observations raise some important questions: how many of the predicted genes are actually located in the constitutive heterochromatin of chromosomes 2 and 3? Do some of these correspond to the essential genes identified by genetic analysis? To address these questions nine bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs) from the proximal regions of 2R and 3L, which contain predicted genes, have been mapped by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to mitotic chromosomes. This analysis has been integrated by mapping 13 single P element insertions. The results show that at least 30 predicted genes are embedded in the most distal regions of constitutive heterochromatin; of these, 22 map to the h46 region of 2R and eight map to the h47 region of 3L.
Materials and methods
Drosophila strains
Genetic markers, mutations and balancer chromosomes are described in Lindsley and Zimm (1992) and FlyBase (http://fly.ebi.ac.uk:7081/). Cultures were maintained at 25°C on standard cornmeal-sucrose-yeast-agar medium.
Predicted genes associated with proximal regions of the arms
Predicted genes of the chromosome 2R and of 3L proximal regions were considered in the present study (Tables 2, 3). On 2R, the scaffolds AE002751.2 and AE002760.2 and AE003040, which contained at least 15 genes, have recently been incorporated into a larger scaffold (Release 3) designated 2R. wgs3 centromere extension (Table 2; Hoskins et al. 2002; see also http://www.fruitfly.org/cgi-bin/annot/gbrowse?name=2R_wgs3_centromere_extension); AE003788.4 carries one gene, AE003787.4 contains 13 genes, AE003786.4 carries eight genes and, finally, 21 genes are present in AE003785.4 (Table 2; see also http://www.fruitfly.org/cgi-bin/annot/basic.pl?qpage=queryresults&qtype=basic&datatype=annotation&subset=all:&sessionid=07775). More than half of these genes are distributed in various sequenced BACs assigned to polytene regions 41–42A (see Table 2; FlyBase http://flybase.bio.indiana.edu/ and GadFly 2003 http://www.fruitfly.org/cgi-bin/annot/query). On 3L, scaffolds AE003599.2, AE002786.2, AE002656.3 and AE002665.4 contain 23, three, three and one genes, respectively (Table 3; see also http://www.fruitfly.org/cgibin/annot/basic.pl?qpage=queryresults&qtype=basic&datatype=annotation&subset=all:&sessionid=07892). These genes are distributed in three sequenced BACs assigned to polytene divisions 79E–80B (Table 3).
P element insertions
19.74.3 and 47.122.1 are white + elements (Hagstrom et al. 1996). P{wAR}41A, P{lacW}l(2)k08138 , P{lacW}l(2)k07312 , P{lacW}l(2)k03002 , P{lacW}k07812 , P{lacW}k02601 ,and P{lacW}vlck01109 are lacZ +and white + elements (Bier et al. 1989). P{PZ}l(2)02047, P{PZ}CH2-6 and P{PZ}CH2-1 are marked with lacZ +and rosy + (Karpen and Spradling 1992). KG01086 is a yellow + and white + SUPor-P element insertion (Roseman et al. 1995).
Cytology
Mitotic chromosome preparations and FISH procedures were described in Gatti et al. (1994). The BAC DNA probes were labeled using a rhodamine nick-translation kit (Boehringer, Mannheim) as described in Dimitri (2003). The Car 20 and pW8 DNA clones, used as probes for PZ elements and Pw +, respectively, were labeled with a biotin nick-translation kit (Boehringer, Mannheim).
Preparation of BAC DNA
Extraction of BAC DNA was as follows: a bacterial culture was seeded in 10 ml of LB medium with antibiotic (20 μg/ml chloramphenicol). Two milliliters of the overnight culture was transferred to a 2 ml microcentrifuge tube and centrifuged for 50 s at 13,000 rpm. The supernatant was discarded and the bacterial pellet resuspended in 100 μl of 50 mM TRIS-HCl, pH 8.5, 10 mM EDTA buffer. Then 200 μl fresh 0.2 M NaOH, 1% SDS solution was added. The tubes were inverted to mix and immediately 150 μl of 7.5 M ammonium acetate solution was added. The tubes were again inverted to mix. After centrifugation at 13,000 rpm for 15 min in a microcentrifuge, the supernatant was transferred to a 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tube with 300 μl of isopropanol. After mixing by inversion, the preparation was centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 10 min in a microcentrifuge. The supernatant was removed. The pellet and the walls of the tube were washed with 300 μl of 70% ethanol; the preparation was then centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 5 min, the supernatant removed and the pellet air-dried. The pellet was resuspended in 50 μl of 10 mM TRIS-HCl, pH 8, 1 mM EDTA buffer containing 50 μg/ml RNase A. This was followed by incubation at 65°C for 10 min. The DNA was stored at 4°C for short-term use.
Microphotography
Chromosome preparations were analyzed using a computer-controlled Zeiss Axioplan epifluorescence microscope equipped with a cooled CCD camera (Photometrics). Fluorescence was visualized using the Pinkel No1 filter set combination (Chroma Technology). The fluorescent signals were recorded by IP Spectrum Lab Software and edited with Adobe PhotoShop 5.
Results
Mapping of BACs to mitotic chromosomes by FISH
We undertook FISH to mitotic chromosomes of y; cn bw sp and/or Oregon R strains of D. melanogaster to map nine BACs that originated from polytene regions 41–42A of 2R and 79E–80B of 3L. It is important to point out that most of these BACs also contain variable amounts of sequences related to TEs. A priori, the intensity and number of hybridization signals may be expected to reflect several factors including the copy number and arrangement of TE sequences within the genome, as well as their relative concentration within a given BAC. Experimentally, however, we found that each tested BAC produced a prominent fluorescent signal on 2R or 3L, the mapping of which was consistent with the BAC location on polytene chromosomes (see below). Only in a few cases did we observe additional minor hybridization sites. It is also important to emphasize that the BACs tested gave similar mapping results in both the y; cn bw sp and the Oregon R strain.
Bacterial artificial chromosomes from polytene divisions 41–42A
The results of this analysis are shown in Figs. 2, 3. We initially tested BACR11B14, BACR06P07 and BACR32F22 (Table 2). At the molecular level, BACR06P07 overlaps proximally with BACR11B14 and its distal border is very close to the proximal end of BACR32F22; together, these BACs identify 17 predicted genes and cover a DNA region of about 500 kb that extends through the scaffolds AE003788.3, AE003787.3 and AE003786.3 (Gadfly 2003 http://www.fruitfly.org/cgi-bin/annot/query). As shown in Fig. 2A, B, a strong signal given by BACR11B14 clearly maps to h46. This mapping was further investigated by FISH experiments in which both BACR11B14 and AAGAG satellite DNAs were simultaneously hybridized to mitotic chromosomes. The tandemly repeated AAGAG sequences form large DNA blocks, corresponding to h36, h38, h40, h43 and h45 n-banded regions of chromosome 2 (Dimitri 1991; Lohe et al. 1993). The fluorescent intensity of the AAGAG signal is usually quite strong in h45 and may slightly spread over the flanking regions. Thus, a putative location of BACR11B14 in the proximal portion of h46 is espected to produce a hybridization signal very close to or even partly overlapping that of AAGAG repeats in h45. On the other hand, if BACR11B14 was located in the middle-distal part of h46, a region of separation between AAGAG and BACR11B14 signals would be seen. As shown in Fig. 2C, the AAGAG hybridization signal in h45 is clearly separated from that of BACR11B14 in h46. This observation suggests that this BAC maps to the middle-distal part of h46. The location of BACR06P07 is cytologically very similar to that of BACR11B14 (Fig. 2F), although at the molecular level the former BAC extends distally about 100 Kb more than the latter (GadFly 2003 http://www.fruitfly.org/cgi-bin/annot/query). In contrast, BACR32F22 exhibits a more distal location in that it lies at the base of region h46. On polytene chromosomes, we mapped BACR11B14 (Fig. 2D) and BACR06P07 (Fig. 2F) to region 41D, while BACR32F22 was located in 41E (Fig. 2H). The polytene location of these BACs differs slightly from that determined by the BDGP (Hoskins, personal comunication; see Table 2). We also mapped BACR01012, which does not overlap with the other tested BACs of 2R and contains the genomic regions of Nipped-B and other predicted genes from Release 3 (scaffold 2R. wgs3 centromere extension; see Table 2). As shown in Fig. 2J, the BACR01012 probe gives three distinct hybridizations signals on 2Rh: a prominent site maps to the very proximal portion of h46, whereas two minor ones are located in h44 and h35. The relatively higher intensity of the signal located in h46 is consistent with our previous mapping of Nipped-B in this region (Dimitri et al. 2003). As anticipated above, the weaker signals in h44 and h35 are likely to reflect the hybridization of repetitive sequences that are known to be present in such regions (Pimpinelli et al. 1995). On polytene chromosomes we have mapped a single sharp signal of BACR01012 to division 41C–D (Fig. 2J). Fluorescence in situ hybridization on mitotic chromosomes with BACR35F09 and BACR23M07 clearly showed that these BACs are excluded from h46 and thus are likely to be located in euchromatin (Fig. 2K). This is in agreement with our polytene chromosome mapping showing that BACR35F09 and BACR23M07 lie in the euchromatic region 42A (Fig. 2K).
Further evidence supporting these results was obtained by FISH mapping of the same BACs in strains carrying two overlapping deficiencies, i.e., Df(2R)M41A10 and Df(2R)M41A4. Df(2R)M41A10 removes approximately the entire mitotic heterochromatin of 2R including h46, while Df(2R)M41A4 only lacks h46 (Dimitri 1991). On polytene chromosomes, Df(2R)M41A10 lacks regions 41A–41D of 2R, while Df(2R)M41A4 is deleted for regions 41D–41F (Koryakov et al. 1996). Genetically, both chromosomes fail to complement mutations in genes located in h46 (Fig. 1). The results show that Df(2R)M41A10 lacks the BACR11B14 (Fig. 2E), BACR06P07 (Fig. 2G) and BACR01012 (data not shown) prominent hybridization signal located in h46, while exhibiting that given by BACR32F22 (Fig. 2I), BACR23M07 (Fig. 2L) and BACR35F09 (data not shown). Df(2R)M41A4 lacks the h46 signal of BACR11B14, BACR06P07, BACR01012 and BACR32F22 while retaining those of BACR35F09 and BACR23M07 (data not shown). Together, these observations confirm that BACR11B14, BACR06P07 and BACR01012 originate from region h46, whereas BACR35F09 and BACR23M07 are euchromatic. Furthermore, the inclusion of BACR32F22 in Df(2R)M41A4, but not in Df(2R)M41A10, suggests that this BAC is not located in h46.
Bacterial artificial chromosomes from polytene divisions 79E–80B
We next analyzed three gene-carrying BACs, i.e., BACR48E05, BACR17M18 and BACR22B15, which have been mapped to divisions 79E6–80B1 of 3L by BDGP (Table 3). BACR48E05 is within scaffold AE003599, while BACR17M18 is contained in AE003599 and AE002786. These two BACs partly overlap and extend along polytene regions 79E6–80A2 and 80A1–B1, respectively. BACR48E05 carries 22 genes (from CG11226 to nrm), while BACR17M18 contains six genes, two of which (CG32457 and nmr) are also present in BACR48E05. BACR22B15, which maps to divisions 80B1–2, derives from scaffolds AE002665 and AE014189 and contains four genes. The results of FISH mapping experiments are shown in Figs. 2, 4. A prominent hybridization signal of BACR48E05 maps distally to h47, a DAPI-dull fluorescence region of 3L h. This suggests that this BAC spans a region corresponding to the euchromatin-heterochromatin junction and/or to proximal euchromatin (Fig. 2M). In contrast, the signals of BACR17M18 and BACR22B15 clearly map to h47, the most distal region of the mitotic heterochromatin of 3L (Fig. 2N, O).
Characterization of single P element insertions
Our analyses have been integrated by mapping 13 P element insertions assigned to polytene region 41 of chromosome 2 (Table 4; see also Materials and methods). Most insertions were previously mapped on polytene chromosomes only (see FlyBase 2003 http://flybase.bio.indiana.edu/), except CH2-6 and CH2-1, which were also localized on mitotic chromosomes (Zhang and Spradling 1994).
Mapping by FISH
The results of this analysis are shown in Fig. 5A–J and Table 4. It appears that four inserts (19.74.3, 47.122.1 , P{wAR}41A and CH2-6) map to the proximal heterochromatic regions of 2R, while the remaining inserts are located in distal portions of 2R heterochromatin. 19.74.3 is the most proximal insert within 2R and lies in h40–41 (Fig. 5A); 47.122.1 maps to h41 (Fig. 5B), consistent with our previous deficiency mapping and FISH localization of rolled (Dimitri 1991; Berghella and Dimitri 1996). Both CH2-6 and P{wAR}41A map to h44 (Fig. 5C,D). CH2-6 was previously mapped to h42-h44 (Zhang and Spradling 1994) and here we provide a more detailed localization. Among the distally located insertions, P{lacW}l(2)k03002 and P{lacW}l(2)k07312 map to h45–h46, while P{lacW}l(2)k07812, CH2-1 , P{PZ}l(2)02047 , P{lacW}l(2)k02601 and KG01086 are located in h46 (Fig. 5E–G, Table 4). Finally, P{lacW}l(2)k01109 and P{lacW}l(2)k08138 map at the base of h46 (Fig. 5H, I).
Genetic tests
Four of the lines examined are homozygous viable (19.74.3, P{wAR}41A , KG01086 and CH2-1), whereas the remainder are recessive lethals. In particular, l(2)02047 and l(2)02601 are lethal alleles of Nipped-B (Rollins et al. 1999); l(2)k01109 is a lethal allele of vulcan, a gene located at 41F, and l(2)k08138 is associated with the predicted gene CG12792 (http://fly.ebi.ac.uk:7081/.bin/fbidq.html?FBgn0022288), which also lies at 41F distally to vulcan (Table 2). In order to establish whether the lethality associated with the inserts was caused by the disruption of genes located in the constitutive heterochromain of 2R, lines 47.122.1, CH2-6 , l(2)k07312 , l(2)k03002 , l(2)k07812 , l(2)02047 , l(2)02601 , l(2)k01109 and l(2)k08138, were tested against Df(2R)M41A10. The results showed that 47.122.1 and, as expected, the two Nipped-B alleles, l(2)02047 and l(2)02601, failed to complement this Df(2R)M41A10, while full complementation was seen with the other tested lines. Further genetic assays using ethylmethane sulfonate-induced lethal alleles of 2R h genes revealed that 47.122.1 is a lethal allele of rolled, in agreement with previous observations (M. Muller, unpublished). The lethality of the l(2)k01109 chromosome is due to a P element inserted within the vulcan gene, which lies outside Df(2R)M41A10. Finally, the lethality of the chromosomes that complement Df(2R)M41A10, but carry a heterochromatic insert located within the h45–h46 portion may be due to other P elements present on chomosome 2. This should be the case of l(2)k07312, l(2)k03002 , and l(2)k07812 chromosomes, each carrying an additional insertion (data not shown).
Mapping of predicted genes to the heterochromatin of 2R and 3L
The FISH analysis of BACs and P elements performed in the present study enabled us to map predicted genes to the mitotic heterochromatin of chromosomes 2 and 3 (Figs. 2, 4, Tables 2, 3).
Genes of 2R h
We found that BACR01012, BACR11B14 and BACR06P07 map to h46, BACR01012 being located at the proximal end of this region (Fig. 2). We also obtained some insight into the location of BACR15A11 by FISH mapping of KG01086. This SUP or P element is inserted 2.5 kb upstream of the 5′ end of CG17486 (http://flypush.imgen.bcm.tmc.edu/pscreen/), one of the eight genes carried by BACR15A11 (Table 2). As shown in Fig. 5G and Table 4, KG01086 maps to region h46. This result indicates that BACR15A11 is also included in h46. It then follows that Nipped-B and all 22 predicted genes located in the genomic portions covered by BACR01012, BACR15A11, BACR11B14 and BACR06P07 map to region h46. In particular, our mapping of BACR01012 suggests that Nipped-B and the six predicted genes carried by this BAC have a more proximal location within h46 than the other genes of the group.
Our experiments showed that BACR32F22, which carries nine predicted genes, is located at the base of region h46, too close to the heterochromatin-euchromatin junction to allow resolution of whether it lies within or outside h46. However, this BAC can be mapped more precisely by comparison between the FISH experiments on Df(2R)M41A10 and Df(2R)M41A4 chromosomes: the former deletion lacks approximately the entire mitotic heterochromatin of 2R including h46, while the latter lacks h46 together with portions of proximal euchromatin (see also Results). We found that the prominent signal of BACR32F22 at the base of h46 is present in Df(2R)M41A10 and absent in Df(2R)M41A4. Together, these observations strongly suggest that BACR32F22 maps outside h46 and thus the nine genes carried by this BAC are likely located in the transition region between euchromatin and heterochromatin or in proximal euchromatin. Our analysis was then extended by the mapping of BACR35F09 and BACR23M07, which carry five genes located in the most distal portion of scaffold AE003785. The results clearly show that both BACs, carrying five predicted genes, map to euchromatin (Fig. 2K, L). Finally, the remaining 21 genes (from CG30438 to Or42b) found between the distal end of BACR32F22 and the proximal border of BACR35F09 are also likely to be scattered throughout the transition region and proximal euchromatin. This conclusion is also supported by the finding that P element insertions within, or close to, genes of this group [i.e., l(2)k01109 and l(2)k08138] also map outside h46 (Fig. 5, Table 4).
Genes of 3L h
The mapping of 3L h predicted genes is shown in Fig. 4. FISH experiments with BACR17M18 and BACR22B15 showed that eight predicted genes (from CG32458 to nAcRalpha-80B) are located in h47, the most distal region of 3L h (Table 3). By contrast, the mapping of BACR48E05 indicated that 23 predicted genes of scaffold AE003599 (from CG11226 to nrm) are distributed throughout the proximal euchromatin and euchromatin-heterochromatin junction.
Discussion
The results of our analyses indicate that, on chromosome 2, 22 predicted genes map to the h46 region, while, on chromosome 3, eight genes are located within h47 (Figs. 3, 4). This amounts to, at least, 30 predicted genes located in the most distal heterochromatic regions of 2R and 3L, where previous studies only detected seven vital genes [ l(2)41Ae, l(2)41Af , l(2)41Ah , Nipped-B , l(3)80Fa , l(3)80Fb and l(3)80Fc; Hilliker 1976; Rollins et al. 1999; Dimitri 1991; Dimitri et al. 2003; Koryakov et al. 2002; see Fig. 1]. How might this difference be explained? It is known that some predictions of genes may actually represent portions of the same gene, or may be spurious. This may lead to an overestimate of the actual number of genes in heterochromatin. It is also possible that classical mutagenesis methods might not allow the detection of all the genetic loci present in a given region. This is certainly true for certain regions of D. melanogaster euchromatin: for example, the X chromosome polytene band 10A1–2 and the Adh gene region were found to contain more genes than those determined by genetic analysis (Kozlova et al. 1997; Ashburner et al. 1999). A similar situation may also exist within heterochromatin; this has been thoroughly discussed by Hoskins et al. (2002).
Four additional predicted genes (CG40241, CG12552 , CG40239 and CG4024) have been detected in the 258 kb scaffold AABU01001947, which contains the large rolled gene region (Hoskins et al. 2002). It is conceivable that these genes are also located in region h41 together with rolled.
Our mapping studies may also yield an interesting outcome for further study of the relationships between mitotic and polytene chromosome heterochromatin. In particular, we found that all BACs and P element inserts located in polytene divisions 41C–41D map to region h46 on mitotic heterochromatin. It is therefore tempting to speculate that, during polytenization, sequences from h46 contribute to the formation of 41C–41D segments of salivary gland chromosomes.
The known genes located in the heterochromatin of Drosophila are on average particularly long due to the occurrence of long introns enriched in TE-related DNA sequences (Devlin et al. 1990; Kurek et al. 2000; Sinclair et al. 2000; Carvalho et al. 2002; Dimitri et al. 2003). Similarly, many of the predicted genes that we mapped to h46 and h47 also have long introns, for example, CG2905 , dd4 on 2R and alpha-catenin on 3L (Hoskins et al. 2002; GadFly 2003 http://www.fruitfly.org/cgi-bin/annot/query), but the average density of TEs does not appear to be as high as that found in introns of known heterochromatic genes (Devlin et al. 1990; Kurek et al. 2000; Dimitri et al. 2003). Both predicted and known heterochromatic genes do not seem to have molecular functions that would distinguish them from genes located in euchromatin (Table 1; Devlin et al. 1990; Parks and Weischaus 1991; Biggs et al. 1994; Rollins et al. 1999; Adams et al. 2000; Kurek et al. 2000; Schulze et al. 2001; Hoskins et al. 2002; Tulin et al. 2002). By contrast, heterochromatic genes might have regulatory requirements and expression patterns that are different from those of euchromatic genes (Wakimoto and Hearn 1990; Eberl et al. 1993). It is tempting to speculate that the occurrence of long introns might have a functional influence on the expression of genes located in heterochromatin as suggested by the finding that, in Caenorhabditis elegans and Homo sapiens, genes expressed at low levels tend to have substantially longer introns than those that are highly expressed (Castillo-Davis et al. 2002).
P element insertions in the heterochromatin of chromosome 2
Insertional mutagenesis with natural or marked P elements has accelerated genetic and molecular studies on heterochromatin (Devlin et al. 1990; Karpen and Spradling 1992; Zhang and Spradling 1994; Roseman et al. 1995; Schulze et al. 2001; Yan et al. 2002). P element insertions can be mapped to the polytenized domains of the chromocenter by in situ hybridization to salivary gland chromosomes (Devlin et al. 1990; Zhang and Spradling 1994; Roseman et al. 1995), but this approach does not provide significant information on the distribution of the insertions within the heterochromatin of diploid cells. Thus, high resolution FISH has been performed on neuroblast mitotic chromosomes of D. melanogaster (Zhang and Spradling 1994; Pimpinelli et al. 1995; Yan et al. 2002; Dimitri 2003), where heterochromatin can be subdivided into 61 cytologically distinct regions by banding techniques (Gatti et al. 1994). Here, we have performed FISH mapping of 13 P element insertions to the mitotic heterochromatin of chromosome 2 (Fig. 5, Table 4). These elements now assigned to specific bands represent useful landmarks for the physical mapping of heterochromatin (Yan et al. 2002; Dimitri 2003) and their remobilization should be useful for recovering insertional alleles or other derivatives. This approach might allow the identification of other 2Rh genes that are not yet characterized at the molecular level. For example, we have evidence suggesting that the remobilization of the 19.74.3 insert can induce novel lethal alleles of the l(2)41Aa gene (N. Corradini, F. Vernì, F. Rossi and P. Dimitri, unpublished). Experiments are in progress to clarify the molecular nature of these mutations.
References
Adams MD, Celniker SE, Holt RA, Evans CA, Gocayne JD et al (2000) The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. Science 287:2185–2195
Ashburner M, Misra S, Roote J, Lewis SE, Blazej R et al (1999) An exploration of the sequence of a 2.9-Mb region of the genome of Drosophila melanogaster: The Adh region. Genetics 153:179–219
Berghella L, Dimitri P (1996) The heterochromatic rolled gene of Drosophila melanogaster is extensively polytenized and transcriptionally active in the salivary gland chromocenter. Genetics 144:117–125
Bier E, Vaessin H, Shepherd S, Lee K, McCall K et al (1989) Searching for pattern and mutation in the Drosophila genome with a P-lacZ vector. Genes Dev 3:1273–1287
Biggs HW, Zavitz HK, Dikinson B, Van Der Straten A, Brunner D et al (1994) The Drosophila rolled locus encodes a MAP kinase required in the sevenless signal transduction pathway. EMBO J 13:1628–1635
Carmena M, Gonzalez C (1995) Transposable elements map in a conserved pattern of distribution extending from beta-heterochromatin to centromeres in Drosophila melanogaster. Chromosoma 103:676–684
Carvalho AB, Bridget AD, Vibranovsky MD, Clark AG (2002) Identification of five new genes on the Y chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:13225–13230
Castillo-Davis CI, Mekhedov SL, Hartl DL, Koonin EV, Kondrashov FA (2002) Selection for short introns in highly expressed genes. Nat Genet 31:415–418
Cenci G, Belloni G, Dimitri P (2003) l(2)41Aa, a heterochromatic gene of Drosophila melanogaster, is required for mitotic and meiotic chromosome condensation. Genet Res 81:15–24
Devlin RH, Bingham B, Wakimoto BT (1990) The organization and expression of the light gene, a heterochromatic gene of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 125:129–140
Dimitri P (1991) Cytogenetic analysis of the second chromosome heterochromatin of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 127:553–564
Dimitri P (1997) Constitutive heterochromatin and transposable elements in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetica 100:85–93
Dimitri P (2003) Fluorescent in situ hybridization with transposable element probes to mitotic chromosome heterochromatin of Drosophila. In: Capy P, Miller W (eds) Mobile genetic elements: protocols and genomic applications. Humana Press, in press
Dimitri P, Corradini N, Rossi F, Vernì F, Cenci G, Belloni G, Zhimulev IF, Koryakov DE (2003) Vital genes in the heterochromatin of chromosomes 2 and 3 of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetica 177:209–215
Eberl D, Duyf BJ, Hilliker AH (1993) The role of heterochromatin in the expression of a heterochromatic gene, the rolled gene of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 134:277–292
Eissenberg JC, Hilliker AJ (2000) Versatility of convinction: heterochromatin as both repressor and an activator of transcription. Genetica 109:19–24
Gatti M, Pimpinelli S (1992) Functional elements in Drosophila melanogaster heterochromatin. Annu Rev Genet 26:239–275
Gatti M, Bonaccorsi S, Pimpinelli S (1994) Looking at Drosophila mitotic chromosomes. Methods Cell Biol 44:371–391
Hagstrom K, Muller M, Schedl P (1996) Fab-7 functions as chromatin domain boundary to ensure proper segment specification by the Drosophila bithorax complex. Genes Dev 10:3202–3215
Hilliker AJ (1976) Genetic analysis of the centromeric heterochromatin of chromosome 2 of Drosophila melanogaster: deficiency mapping of EMS-induced lethal complementation groups. Genetics 83:765–782
Hoskins RA, Smith CD, Carlson JW, Carvalho AB, Halpern A, et al (2002) Heterochromatic sequences in a Drosophila whole-genome shotgun assembly. Genome Biol 3(12):research 0085.1–0085.16
Inoue YH, Glover DM (1998) Involvement of the rolled/MAP kinase gene in Drosophila mitosis: interaction between genes for the MAP kinase cascade and abnormal spindle. Mol Gen Genet 258:334–341
John B (1988) The biology of heterochromatin. In: Verma RS (ed) Heterochromatin: molecular and structural aspects, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 1–128
Karpen GH, Spradling AC (1992) Analysis of subtelomeric heterochromatin in the Drosophila minichromosome Dp1187 by single P element insertional mutagenesis. Genetics 132:737–753
Koryakov DE, Belyaeva ES, Alekseyenko AA, Zhimulev IF (1996) Alpha and beta heterochromatin in polytene chromosome 2 of Drosophila melanogaster. Chromosoma 105:310–319
Koryakov DE, Zhimulev IF, Dimitri P (2002) Cytogenetic analysis of the third chromosome heterochromatin of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 160:509–517
Kozlova T, Zhimulev IF, Kafatos FC (1997) Molecular organization of an individual Drosophila polytene chromomere: transcribed sequences in the 10A1–2 band. Mol Gen Genet 257:55–61
Kurek R, Reugels AM, Lammermann U, Buenemann H (2000) Molecular aspects of intron evolution in dynein encoding mega-genes on the heterochromatic Y chromosome of Drosophila sp. Genetica 109:113–123
Lindsley DL, Zimm GG (1992) The genome of Drosophila melanogaster. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif
Lohe AR, Hilliker AJ, Roberts PA (1993) Mapping simple repeated DNA sequences in heterochromatin of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 134:1149–1174
Marchant GE, Holm DG (1988) Genetic analysis of the heterochromatin of chromosome 3 in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Vital loci identified through EMS mutagenesis. Genetics 120:519–532
McKee BD (1998) Pairing sites and the role of chromosome pairing in meiosis and spermatogenesis in male Drosophila. Curr Top Dev Biol 37:77–115
Misra S, Crosby MA, Mungall CJ, Matthews BB, Campbell KS, et al (2002) Annotation of the Drosophila melanogaster euchromatic genome: a systematic review. Genome Biology 3(12):research0083.1–0083.22
Parks S, Wieschaus E (1991) The Drosophila gastrulation gene concertina encodes a Ga-like protein. Cell 64:447–458
Pimpinelli S, Berloco M, Fanti L, Dimitri P, Bonaccorsi S, et al (1995) Transposable elements are stable structural components of Drosophila melanogaster heterochromatin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92: 3804–3808
Rollins RA, Morcillo P, Dorsett D (1999) Nipped-B, a Drosophila homologue of chromosomal adherins, participates in activation by remote enhancers in the cut and Ultrabithorax genes. Genetics 152:577–593
Roseman RR, Johnson EA, Rodesh CK, Bjerke M, Nagoshi RN, Geyer PK (1995) A P element containing suppressor of Hairy-wing binding regions has novel properties for mutagenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 141:1061–1074
Schulze S, Sinclair DA, Silva E, Fitzpatrick KA, Singh M et al (2001) Essential genes in proximal 3L heterochromatin of Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Gen Genet 264:782–789
Sinclair DA, Schulze S, Silva E, Fitzpatrick KA, Honda BM (2000) Essential genes in autosomal heterochromatin of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetica 109:9–18
Sullivan BA, Blower MD, Karpen GH (2001) Determining centromere identity: cyclical stories and forking paths. Nat Rev Genet 2:584–596
Sumner AT (1990) Chromosome banding. Unwin Hyman, London
Tulin A, Stewart D, Spradling AC (2002) The Drosophila heterochromatic gene encoding poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) is required to modulate chromatin structure during development. Genes Dev 16:2108–2119
Wakimoto BT, Hearn MG (1990) The effects of chromosome rearrangements on the expression of heterochromatic genes in chromosome 2L of D. melanogaster. Genetics 125:141–154
Warner TS, Sinclair DA, Fitzpatrick KA, Singh M, Devlin RH, Honda BM (1998) The light gene of Drosophila melanogaster encodes a homologue of VPS41, a yeast gene involved in cellular-protein trafficking. Genome 41:236–243
Weiler KS, Wakimoto BT (1995) Heterochromatin and gene expression in Drosophila. Annu Rev Genet 29:577–605
Yan CM, Dobie KW, Le HD, Konev AY, Karpen GH (2002) Efficient recovery of centric heterochromatin P element insertions in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 161:217–229
Zhang P, Spradling AC (1994) Insertional mutagenesis of Drosophila heterochromatin with single P elements. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91:3539–3543
Zuckerkandl E, Hennig W (1995) Tracking heterochromatin. Chromosoma 104:75–83
Acknowledgements
We wish to thank Michael Ashburner, Nicolaj Junakovic, Roger Hoskins, Patrizia Lavia and Chris Smith for helpful comments and discussions. We are also gratefull to our friend Igor Zhimulev for his help in the interpretation of polytene chromosome images. We are indebted to Ruggiero Caizzi for the gift of BACs and Martin Muller, Hugo Bellen laboratory and BDGP for providing us with P element insertion lines. This work was supported by grants from the Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica and Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Edited by: B. McKee
N. Corradini and F. Rossi contributed equally to this work
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Corradini, N., Rossi, F., Vernì, F. et al. FISH analysis of Drosophila melanogaster heterochromatin using BACs and P elements. Chromosoma 112, 26–37 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00412-003-0241-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00412-003-0241-9