Abstract
Ototoxicity is a well-known side effect of cisplatin. Some genetic and non-genetic risk factors were described for cisplatin ototoxicity. Although there are some studies which point out a sex-related difference for cisplatin nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity, sex-related differences for cisplatin ototoxicity have not been studied. The aim of this study is to reveal whether there is any gender-related difference for susceptibility to cisplatin ototoxicity in rats. Fourteen male, 14 female Wistar albino rats were divided into four groups; a female control, a male control, a female cisplatin and a male cisplatin group. Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission and, Auditory Brainstem Response measurements were obtained. For the cisplatin groups 16 mg/kg of cisplatin was applied. On the 4th day audiological examinations were repeated. After killing, cochleae and brainstem tissues were evaluated by light and electron microscopy. The hearing of the female rat cisplatin group was found to have deteriorated more than the hearing of the male rat cisplatin group. Histopathological evaluation revealed more serious damage in the spiral ganglion and brainstem tissues of female rats. Hearing of female rats deteriorated more than the hearing of male rats upon application of cisplatin. This difference in hearing can be attributed to the more severe damage seen in neuronal tissues such as spiral ganglion cells and brainstem neurons.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Cisplatin (CDDP) is a widely used chemotherapeutic agent for the treatment of various malignancies. Unfortunately it has some dose limiting side effects like ototoxicity, nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity. Incidence of cisplatin ototoxicity has been reported as 13–96 % in different studies. It usually presents as a bilateral sensorineural hearing loss which first involves high frequencies. Apoptosis due to reactive oxygen species has been shown to be the major cause of ototoxicity. Pre-existing hearing loss, radiotherapy to the head and neck region, combined therapy with other ototoxic drugs, young age (<5), have been defined as non-genetic risk factors for CDDP ototoxicity. Apart from these factors genetic risk factors like megalin and glutathione S-transferases gene polymorphism have also been found to play a role. Although there are some studies which point out a sex-related difference for cisplatin nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity [1–3] currently there is no study which addresses the same differences for CDDP ototoxicity. While our team was conducting different in vitro studies on cisplatin ototoxicity [4, 5] we thought that there may be a sex-related difference among animals, however, none of these studies were planned to research this aspect. In this study we aimed to reveal whether there is any sex-related difference for susceptibility to CDDP ototoxicity in rats.
Materials and methods
The study was approved by the Animal Experiments Local Ethic Committee of Dokuz Eylul University Medical School. Fourteen female and 14 male Wistar albino rats weighting 250–300 g were randomly divided into four groups.
Study groups
Group I (n = 7): male control group
Group II (n = 7): female control group
Group III (n = 7): male cisplatin group
Group IV (n = 7): female cisplatin group
The rats were kept in ordinary cages with free access to food and water at a temperature of 23 ± 3 °C and a relative humidity of 50 ± 10 % with artificial lighting for a period of 12 h each day. All animals were anesthetized with intraperitoneal ketamine hydrochloride (60 mg/kg) and xylazine hydrochloride (5 mg/kg) injections prior to interventions.
On the first day of the study hearing thresholds were determined by distortion product otacoustic emissions (DPOAE) and auditory brainstem responses (ABR). On the 4th day of the study a single dose of 16 mg/kg CDDP was administrated intraperitoneally to group III and IV and the same volume of saline was given intraperitoneally to group I and II. On the 7th day of the study DPOAE and ABR tests were repeated. Immediately after tests all animals were killed and cochleae and brainstems were collected for light and electron microscopic examination.
Auditory assessment
The tympanic membranes and external auditory canals of all animals were inspected prior to the study. Animals with signs of any external or middle ear problems were excluded from the study. Rats were sedated with ketamine hydrochloride (60 mg/kg) and xylazine hydrochloride (5 mg/kg). All DPOAEs and ABR tests were performed in a quiet room on the first day of the study (baseline measurement) and repeated on the 7th day of the study (72 h following the intraperitoneal cisplatin administration).
To test the integrity of the outer hair cells, DPOAE recordings were elicited from the right and left ear of each rat using the ILO-96 cochlear emission analyzer apparatus (Otodynamic Ltd, London, UK). The baseline hearing thresholds of all rats were determined by DPgram, and the signal-to-noise ratio was recorded at 7 frequencies as previously described [4]. ABRs were recorded using ICS Medical Charter equipment via insert earphones as previously described [6.]. Wave II, the wave which had the largest amplitude was used to define hearing thresholds.
Killing and tissue sampling
All rats were killed under ether anesthesia after the final auditory assessments. Temporal bones and brainstem tissues were collected for histopathologic examination.
Histopathologic examinations
Apoptosis detection
In cochlea tissues cell death was assessed with TUNEL assay that can detect fragmented DNA in the nucleus (GenScript Tunel Apoptosis Detection Kit. L00300, for paraffin embedded tissue sections, FITC-labeled POD). The kit was applied on slides according to manufacturer’s instruction. After deparaffinization and rehydration of sections, they were incubated with Proteinase K and blocking was done by 3 % H2O2, tunel reaction mix containing Equilibration Buffer, FITC-12-dUTP and TdT was applied for 60 min at 37 °C. Assay was done with Olympus fluorescence microscope using excitation wave 450–500 nm and emission wave 515–565 nm (green). 5,000 cells per condition were evaluated and scored as % of apoptosis per all cells. All cell number was assessed by DAPI counterstain. DAPI-stained photos show nucleus of all cells in bright blue by staining DNA of the nuclei. After DAPI staining apoptotic cells are labeled by FITC by tunel method TdT. Apoptotic cells are seen in bright green.
Brainstem examination
The brainstem samples were evaluated with light microscopy using TUNEL (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labeling) and caspase-3 methods as previously described in our published studies [6].
Electron microscopic examination
For electron microscopic examination of cochlear structures, temporal bones were carefully harvested and after cochleas were opened laterally and samples were treated according to the technique described previously [6].
Statistical analyses
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 15.0 software package for Windows (Statistical Package for Social Sciences; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and p values less than 0.05 were considered as statistically significant. Results are presented as means ± standard deviation. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) post hoc Bonferroni test was used to compare the DPOAE values and ABR thresholds in each group, while Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare the apoptosis percentages of the groups. Wilcoxon test was used to test the retest variability for control groups.
Results
Audiological results
Regarding the baseline audiological examinations no statistically significant difference was found among groups (p > 0.05) (Figs. 1, 2). We did not find any significancy for retest variability between control groups (p > 0.05). The last audiological examination revealed that CDDP administration led to ototoxicity both in male and female rats. In both male and female CDDP-administered groups; click, 6 and 8 kHz ABR and 4, 6, and 8 kHZ DPOAEs values were significantly worse than those of the control groups (p < 0.05). (Figs. 3, 4).
When comparing male and female CDDP-administered groups we found that 6 and 8 kHz ABR and DPOAE values of female rats were significantly worse than those of male rats (p < 0.05). However, click ABR values showed no significant difference between these two groups.
Histopathological results
Light microscopic findings
Inner ear histopathological examination
Apoptosis: The mean percentage of apoptotic cells in the spiral ganglion were 1.1, 1.2, 10.4 and 16.7 % in Group I, Group II, Group III and Group IV, respectively. The apoptosis ratio in spiral ganglion neurons was significantly higher in Group III and IV compared with Groups I, II (p = 0.0001). Moreover, when we compare both CDDP groups; we found that in the female CDDP group (group IV) there were more apoptotic spiral ganglion neurons than in the male CDDP group (group III) (p < 0.05). But cochlea apoptotic cell ratio between group III and IV was not statistically significant (5.8 vs 6.4 %) (Fig. 5).
Brainstem histopathological findings
In both female and male CDDP groups apoptosis was seen in brainstem tissues (Figs. 6, 7). Apoptotic caspase-3 and TUNEL + cells were statistically higher than their control groups. In the comparison of the CDDP groups in females, apoptosis was clearly more severe than males (Fig. 8).
Electron microscopic findings
In male control and female control groups, the ultrastructure of hair cells and supporting cells was normal. The boundaries of the cell membrane and nucleus were regular. Mitochondria showed normal properties. In male CDDP and female CDDP groups, intracellular degenerative areas and irregularities on the boundaries of the cell membrane were observed (Fig. 9).
In male control and female control groups, the ultrastructure of ganglion cells and satellite cells was normal. The boundaries and shapes of the cells were regular. In male CDDP and female CDDP groups, irregularity at the cell membranes and cell nucleus was seen. There were cytoplasmic degenerative areas and loss of satellite cells in both groups (Fig. 10).
Discussion
Sex differentiation begins at embryonal life and it is under hormonal and genetic control. Sex-specific differences of effects of various molecules have not been widely studied in comparative studies [7, 8]. Apart from effects of sex hormones many factors can lead to different responses to toxic agents in different sexes [9]. This may be attributed to toxicogenetics-related with body size, blood volume size of the target organ, absorbtion differences and protein bindings. Toxicodynamics related with receptors, responsiveness of target organs, reached dose at the site and interactions with other molecules are also effective in different responses. For many drugs the exact mechanism of different responsiveness has not been well understood. Indeed, the effect of a given molecule may be different in various tissues of the male and female [9, 10]. Moreover, these differences may be seen before sexual maturation and may be under genetic sex control e.g. can be linked to sex chromosomes. Franconi et al. [11] concluded that pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and side effects of drugs differ between sexes.
Cisplatin is a widely used antineoplastic agent. Ototoxicity is one of the commonest side effects of CDDP which hampers application of high doses. Toxic effects of CDDP on various organs may differ among sexes. However, currently there are no studies on the sex-specific ototoxic effect of this agent.
In humans many factors such as cranial irradiation, young age, bolus and high-dose injections of cisplatin are accepted as risk factors for cisplatin ototoxicity [12–16]. But there is no consensus on whether sex is a risk factor or not for this undesirable effect. Although some studies conclude that male sex is more under threat for this side effect [13, 14] others find no relation with sex [12, 15].
The literature on sex-related CDDP toxicity reveals that results are conflicting even on the same tissues [17–19]. Lu et al. [18] compared CDDP toxicity on renal tubular epithelial cell cultures in both sexes of monkeys and rats. Although rat cells were more sensitive than monkey cells there were not any sex-related differences in either species. In another nephrotoxicity study, female rats were found to be more susceptible to CDDP than males. These differences can be attributed to the effect of estrogen [19]. Estrogen is known to have cardioprotective and nephroprotective properties. However, in a study conducted on ovariectomised rats estrogen replacement led to increased CDDP nephrotoxicity. It is thought that high estrogen levels may cause enhanced oxidative stress by nitrous oxide (NO) production [19]. Stakisaitis et al. [20] proved that CDDP can cause more severe tubular damage and increased sodium excretion in male rats. In some studies it was concluded that estrogen may increase CDDP nephrotoxicity in rats [2, 19]. Effects of protective agents such as recombinant erythropoietin against CDDP nephrotoxicity may also differ between sexes [3].
Regarding neurotoxicity there are some confusing publications. Wongtawatchai et al. [1] proved that CDDP led to more neuronal damage in male rats. However, myelinated fiber density and myelin diameter were more severely affected in females. However, Shabani et al. [21] found that although hippocampal and cerebellum functions were severely affected upon CDDP exposure in rats there were not any differences between genders.
Recently many in vitro and in vivo studies have been conducted on the effects of different molecules for the prevention of CDDP ototoxicity [4, 5, 16, 22, 23]. However, none of them took sex differences into consideration. While our team was working on the otoprotective effect of resveratrol [4], acetyl L-carnitine [5], Korean red ginseng (unpublished data) it was observed that ototoxic effects of CDDP were different among sexes. We had used female rats for acetyl L-carnitine and male rats for other molecules. For each study the decision about which gender of animal to use was random but CDDP doses and the administration route were exactly the same. Overall evaluation of these studies showed that CDDP ototoxicity was more prominent in females. Because of this we decided to conduct this comparative study.
Our findings implied that CDDP more severely damaged hearing in female rats. Otoacoustic emissions deteriorated in both sexes at 6 and 8 kHz. However, this deterioration was more severe in females. In a similar way ABR levels were also elevated in both sexes but more in females. Histopathologic analyses showed us more severely damaged spiral ganglion cells in female rats on electron microscopic examinations. Moreover, immunofluorescence images revealed many more apoptotic spiral ganglion cells in the female CDDP group than in the male CDDP group. In brainstem samples apoptosis was more evident for the female CDDP group but in hair cells CDDP-related damage was not obviously different between sexes. In the light of these findings we can say that the more severe hearing loss seen in female rats may mostly be attributable to neurotoxicity seen in spiral ganglion cells and brainstem. Since metabolism of various molecules which would be used against CDDP ototoxicity is also expected to differ among genders, any ototoxicity study on rats should take sex into consideration.
Conclusion
Our results implied that hearing of female rats deteriorated more than that of males upon application of Cisplatin. This difference can be attributed to the more severe damage seen in neuronal tissues such as spiral ganglion cells and brainstem neurons. To clarify the causes of these different damage patterns more studies are necessary. We think that in every cisplatin ototoxicity study sex of the animals should be taken into account.
References
Wongtawatchai T, Agthong S, Kaewsema A, Chentanez V (2009) Sex related differences in cisplatin- induced neuropathy in rats. J Med Assoc Thai 92:1485–1491
Aydın I, Agilli M (2014) Aydin FN gender differences influences renal injury in cisplatin- treated rats: biochemical evaluation. Biol Trace Elem Res 158:275. doi:10.1007/S12011-014-9945-3
Jazi FE, Nematbakhsh M, Pezeshkin Z et al (2013) Sex differences in protective effect of recombinant human erythropoietin against cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity in rats. Iran J Kidney Dis 7:383–389
Olgun Y, Kırkım G, Kolatan E et al (2014) Friend or foe? Effect of oral resveratrol on cisplatin ototoxicity. Laryngoscope 124:760–766
Güneş D, Kırkım G, Kolatan E et al (2011) Evaluation of the effect of acetyl L-carnitine on experimental cisplatin ototoxicity and neurotoxicity. Chemotherapy 57(3):186–194
Olgun Y, Kırkım G, Kolatan E (2013) Otoprotective effect of recombinant human erythropoietin in a model of newborn hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 77:739–746
Nicolson TJ, Mellor HR, Roberts RR (2010) Gender differences in drug toxicity. Trends Pharmacol Sci 31(3):108–114
Gochfeld M (2007) Framework for gender differences in human and animal toxicology. Environ Res 104:4–21
Beirle I, Meibohm B, Derendorf H (1999) Gender Differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 37:529–547
Wang J, Huanf Y (2007) Pharmocogenomics of Sex Difference in Chemotherapeutic Toxicity. Curr Drug Discov Technol 4:59–68
Franconi F (2007) Brunelleschi, Stardo L, Cuomo V. Gender differences in drug responses. Pharmacol Res 55:81–95
Langer T, Zehnhoff-Dinnesen A, Radtke S, Meitert J, Zolk O (2013) Understanding platinum-induced ototoxicity. Trends Pharmacol Sci 1059:1–12
Li Y, Womer RB, Silber JH (2004) Predicting cisplatin ototoxicity in children: the influence of age and the cumulative dose. Eur J of Cancer 40:2445–2451
Yancey A, Haris MS, Egbelakin A et al (2012) Risk factors for cisplatin-associated ototoxicity in pediatric oncology patients. Pediatr Blood Cancer 9:144–148
Coradini PP, Cigana L, Selistre SG, Rosito LS, Brunetto AL (2007) Ototoxicity from cisplatin therapy in childhood cancer. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 29(6):355–360
Olgun Y (2013) Cisplatin ototoxicity: where we are? Int Adv Otol 9(3):395–408
Wei Q et al (2005) Differential gender differences in ischemic and nephrotoxic acute renal failure. Am J Nephrol 25:491–499
Lu Y, Kawashima A, Horii I, Zhong L (2005) Cisplatin induced cytotoxicity in BSO-exposed renal proximal tubular epithelial cells: sex, age and species. Ren Fail 27(5):629–633
Pezeshki Z, Nematbakhsh M, Ashrafi F (2013) Evidence against protective role of sex hormone estrogen in cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity in ovarectomized rat model. Toxicol Int 20(1):43–47
Stakisaitis D, Dudeniene G, Jankūnas RJ, Grazeliene G, Didziapetriene J, Pundziene B (2010) Cisplatin increases urinary sodium excretion in rats: gender-related differences. Medicina (Kaunas) 46(1):45–50
Shabani M, Larizadeh MH, Parsania S, Hajali V, Shojaei A (2012) Evaluation of destructive effects of exposure to cisplatin during developmental stage: no profound evidence for sex differences in impaired motor and memory performance. Int J Neurosci 8:439–448
Im GJ, Chang JW, Choi J, Chae W, Ko EJ, Jung HH (2010) Protective effect of korean red gingsenf extract on cisplatin ototoxicity in HEI-OC1 auditory cells. Phytothrer Res 24:614–621
Riga MG, Chelis L, Kakolyris S et al (2004) Prevention of cisplatin ototoxicity using transtympanic N- acetylcysteine and lactate. Otol Neurootol 25:910–915
Acknowledgments
This study was financially supported by a grant from Dokuz Eylul University Research Foundation.
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kirkim, G., Olgun, Y., Aktas, S. et al. Is there a gender-related susceptibility for cisplatin ototoxicity?. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272, 2755–2763 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-3283-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-3283-0